Ben, I have been going through the same thing. I am done with non dual teachings, but still I am seeking and coming back. It has become a obsession and sometimes I feel like loosing my mind. Horrible. If u want to talk let me know.
@@thisboundlessfreedom i notice that really chill people or dead people have those chilling eyes hehe btw youre so sweet whenever i feel bad i watch you smile 🤣😁😁thanks for the smiles even if youre not doing it all the best❤️
Maybe a valid perspective from the point of view of the "boundless energy". As for the point of view of an individual self it is an irrelevant perspective. Which makes this interesting: an individual self is giving words to a perspective that is irrelevant to itself. Which is a brilliant contradiction: an individual self can be an expression of "boundless energy" and thus there are ways for this expression to occur and even to be conceptualized. But "boundless energy" can't be an expression of an individual self and so there are no tools for it and even the words about it don't make sense as what they are trying to point to is nonsensical.
All there is is boundless energy which has no perspective at all, as it is all the singular appearance being this. So any apparent self, would also be an expression of that appearance. Turns out that appearance is illusory... Which means, not actually real or happening. So, in the end, the only contradiction is in the mind of the individual seeker, which still experiences itself as something real. Edit: which is the nonsense you seem to describe as your experience.
@@NijFix I mean something different. I'll give it a go from a different angle. An actor on the screen exists, the story in which the actor is playing exists. At the same time in the movie theater they don't exist as objects. Mice that live in that movie theater (because why not have mice for this example) do exist in the theater as it's real inhabitants. Mice can perceive the screen and some action on it. Actors on the screen can't perceive the existence of mice (or the movie theater for that matter). Any constituent of a movie theater can communicate the idea that actors and everything else appearing on the screen aren't in the movie theater. Actors on the screen in no way can communicate it to the events on the screen. Now, an actor who's no longer on the screen but in his usual life as a person can walk into a theater and easily communicate that the image of themselve on the screen isn't actually present as an object in the movie theater. BUT s/he can only communicate it to other subjects that are actually present in the theater (to whom it would be completely obvious even without this communication). There is no way for such actor to communicate this information to other subjects on the screen. If this actor started a speech addressed to characters on the screen about how the screen events dont exist, how all the characters are just a story and there is a reality beyond that story, how s/he also once was wrapped up in the story on the screen and had no idea of how wonderful is the popcorn in the theater bar, etc that would be ridiculous even though it would be completely true.
All that appears to be happening, is boundless energy. Apparent deep sleep, so-called dreaming, and so-called "waking" and whatever other labels there may be. There are no divisions. No distinctions. No separate "states". Everything that appears to be happening is whole and complete. Boundlessly free.
Buongiorno 🙏🏼 Namastè
All there is beauty 😍
💝
😊👍🔥
Ben, I have been going through the same thing. I am done with non dual teachings, but still I am seeking and coming back. It has become a obsession and sometimes I feel like loosing my mind. Horrible. If u want to talk let me know.
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM 💥💥💥
❤❤
❤☺
"more netflix than non duality!" "just having a chinwag on zoom" Pure gold! Izzy Cloke, 2023😂
😂😂♥️
🙂
🥰
I know this is a funny question but what hair products do you use lol xoxox
It's like i'm listening to a talk of Tony Parsons and Jim Newman...
And thank goodness for that.
I love your hair izzyyyyy ❤ btw are you a stoner your eyes look stoned hehe ❤
Thank you! And no! 🤣🤣
@@thisboundlessfreedom i notice that really chill people or dead people have those chilling eyes hehe btw youre so sweet whenever i feel bad i watch you smile 🤣😁😁thanks for the smiles even if youre not doing it all the best❤️
Izzy is this the same thing what nikola tesla means with everything is energy vibration and frequency ?
No one knows what appears to appear but also no one knows what boundless energy is. A waist of apparent time 😂
Maybe a valid perspective from the point of view of the "boundless energy". As for the point of view of an individual self it is an irrelevant perspective. Which makes this interesting: an individual self is giving words to a perspective that is irrelevant to itself. Which is a brilliant contradiction: an individual self can be an expression of "boundless energy" and thus there are ways for this expression to occur and even to be conceptualized. But "boundless energy" can't be an expression of an individual self and so there are no tools for it and even the words about it don't make sense as what they are trying to point to is nonsensical.
All there is is boundless energy which has no perspective at all, as it is all the singular appearance being this. So any apparent self, would also be an expression of that appearance. Turns out that appearance is illusory... Which means, not actually real or happening. So, in the end, the only contradiction is in the mind of the individual seeker, which still experiences itself as something real.
Edit: which is the nonsense you seem to describe as your experience.
@@NijFix I mean something different. I'll give it a go from a different angle. An actor on the screen exists, the story in which the actor is playing exists. At the same time in the movie theater they don't exist as objects. Mice that live in that movie theater (because why not have mice for this example) do exist in the theater as it's real inhabitants. Mice can perceive the screen and some action on it. Actors on the screen can't perceive the existence of mice (or the movie theater for that matter). Any constituent of a movie theater can communicate the idea that actors and everything else appearing on the screen aren't in the movie theater. Actors on the screen in no way can communicate it to the events on the screen. Now, an actor who's no longer on the screen but in his usual life as a person can walk into a theater and easily communicate that the image of themselve on the screen isn't actually present as an object in the movie theater. BUT s/he can only communicate it to other subjects that are actually present in the theater (to whom it would be completely obvious even without this communication). There is no way for such actor to communicate this information to other subjects on the screen. If this actor started a speech addressed to characters on the screen about how the screen events dont exist, how all the characters are just a story and there is a reality beyond that story, how s/he also once was wrapped up in the story on the screen and had no idea of how wonderful is the popcorn in the theater bar, etc that would be ridiculous even though it would be completely true.
Izzy is there boundless energy in deep sleep?
I would think so,if nothing is excluded and not two
Boundless energy is all there is. Asleep or awake is within boundless energy. My opinion.
All that appears to be happening, is boundless energy. Apparent deep sleep, so-called dreaming, and so-called "waking" and whatever other labels there may be. There are no divisions. No distinctions. No separate "states". Everything that appears to be happening is whole and complete. Boundlessly free.
Plz irani
😂😂😂