Re: a6700 overheating. The results from different channels are all over the map. My copy did quite well comparatively, but if you're considering purchasing this camera, I'd err on the safe side and go with the 40-50 minute results just to be safe. I talked with Jordan from PetaPixel and we tested almost identically and I got nearly an hour longer than him. Not sure how to explain that. 🤷♂ I'll test a retail copy when I can and update you. 👍
With non stop stills/photography in climate of at least 79-85F, do you think that would cause the 6700 to overheat? We pre-ordered this camera but now doubting if it's a bad idea with the overheating that could happen if we use this for photography in locations with warmer climate/travel. The other reviews don't even mention the possibility of it overheating
I literally pre-purchased this camera after watching your review, then canceled after watching others - I wish this wasn't an issue because I would totally use this camera since it has a mechanical shutter - but for now I have to stick with the FX30
Hey Gerald, I was wondering if you could help me out with this choice..I own a Fuji X-T5 and I love it but this new Sony A6700 looks really good to me, maybe even the rumored A7CII. But which one would be the smartest option? I mostly do cinematography and some photography. I know I also have to think about lenses, accesories, ect..Let me know if you have any tips! thanks!
I was with the a6300 since a long time. Was almost ready to get the fx30 but the lack of specs for photography was bothering me ... Now we have almost everything I keed akd want with the a6700. Even if for vidéography the fx30 still a beast 😱
Just put a couple small rubber o-rings around the jangly triangles. They will pinch against the mounts and keep them from jangling. Does make them stick out sideways, but they remain flexible, so not an issue. I do it with all my Sonys.
Bubble Gum & Glue, Oh yeah, get some piano wire while u are it too, Sony likes DYI Guys & Gals: Set the Heat to High, Open the Flip Screen-way out. Oh yes, keep the battery door open-Great to Lose Batteries & Help Sony's competition with Tesla Lithium-Save the Planet Policies. One more caveat: Keep the SD Card Slot Open Too. U can buy more cheap Tough Cards if they all fall out, but don't worry, your cam will stay somewhat cooler. Yeah, great Design Tech Sony Boys. We should all rush out and get at least three of these. One for right hand shooting, One for left hand shooting & a Spare in the Backpack! 😎😎
I just prefer to remove the jangly triangles. You can do that in a similar manner to removing a key ring, and you can put them back on when it comes time to trade-in/sell the camera
Yo I just started really liking your channel and then Tom Green randomly does a cameo in the beginning of this video im already gonna watch , well, Now it's true love
Hi Gerald, Please let me know if you had the chance to test HDMI out. If you had it, are there any limitations? I'm interested for monitoring, to have "Info Display" out in photo and video mode for all resolutions. Thank you!
If you google for "dpreview video stills tool" - and you chose e.g. a6300 (4K UHD) vs a6700 (4K UHD), well, the a6300 footage is superior (at least to my eyes!) The setup claims to be on same lens/aperture etc So how can the much older a6300 produce better S35 4K video footage compared to this new a6700 is a mystery to me Both APS-C bodies claim to produce 4K from oversampled 6K However the a6300 is CMOS whilst the a6700 is BSI-CMOS. Could that be the difference? As far as pixel bining goes - I m not sure what's the case for the a6300/a6700 Or could it be the case that this DPreview video tool isn't too reliable
Plenty about the FX30 that’s superior still, like internal fan, dual card slots and full size HDMI out to name just a few. The FX30 is a workhorse, this camera simply is not.
The fact that a $1400 camera in their lineup has breathing compensation but a $5000 camera doesn’t is inane. They can no longer claim it’s because of the Cinema Line/Alpha Line divide either, since this is a photo-first camera.
This is what vloggers have been waiting for for years. Not the ev1. And the people who loved the a6000-series will be happy with the 10 bit 4:2:2, which was the weakest point of the camera. Definitely a winner.
At 1:47, that scroll wheel on the front of the grip sold it. Need no more information, well, I won't go that far. I love my a6600, was thinking of the ZV-E1, but the lack of EVF was a turn-off as I am more a still shooter, not the next George Lucas.
The original A6000 wasn't weak for me when I had it in 2015 to 2018. It was my pro gear for paid and volunteer jobs it was fantastic. It's just another tool for jobs, it's what you do with tools you have and skills you know.
@@flat-out A camera limited to 100mbps 8bit 420 will be limited to very low budget and low paying jobs. You can't use it professionally with confidence. This version is at least viable for professional use.
Still rocking the Sony 6300 to this day I remember nreally splurging on the 6600 when it launched BUT this, this is what ai had been waiting for. 10 bit color is all that sold me in this camera. Finally I can grade my Air2s and ground camera footage without much hassle.
I'm SO GLAD I just sold my 6+ year old Sony A6500 a couple weeks ago. I would have lost another couple hundred of dollars now that this monster has been released. As always great video sir!
@@erum.m I sold it at KEH for I think $450 or so in excellent plus condition. I upgraded to the Sony A7IV about 5 months ago, and had been using that Sony A6500 for over 6½ years or so.
The fact that this camera has breathing compensation and the a7 SIII still doesn't is yet another slap in the face from Sony. Let's not forget that they're pushing new cameras into consumer's hands without investing in the longevity of their older "flagship" cameras. The more new cameras that come out with features the a7 SIII should have, the more I feel forgotten and disrespected by Sony.
Of course Sony aren't interested in the longevity of your camera. Sony are in this business to make money. They won't do that by making the camera you've already bought significantly better than it was when you bought it. It's not a slap in the face. It's a business model.
@@ZeroFilmClips Not necessarily. We’re more likely to buy into the Sony ecosystem if we know our cameras will last. And you’re discounting lens sales. I haven’t bought the Sony 20mm G because my a7 SIII doesn’t have breathing comp. If they added breathing comp to all of their more expensive flagship cameras those prosumers would spend more on glass. That would be a business decision that benefits the company. But instead they insist on annoying their consumer-base and making them feel like their cameras have been forgotten.
If youre asking mainly about the video dynamic range then theres no question the a6700 is better, considering it has 10bit 4:2:2 compared to a6600 only having 8bit. You can now properly make use of the SLog3 picture profile and get a better dynamic range. When it comes to photos I think they would probably be the same with the a6600 but a6700 would slightly be better because it using a newer and better sensor with 2MP more.
@@johndc7446 yes it's certain than a 10bit slog3 codec will give you better result than the 8bit slog2. but i would a loved to see "how much" is it better. to see if it's really worth the upgrade :) how many stops of DR are we talkin about, how many stops of lattitude under/over, etc.
How does it compare to the X-S20? - 6.2k open gate, 7 stops IBIS (2 more than Sony), 4k60 webcam for external recording and power with 1 cable (no drivers needed), 10bit 4:2:2 360mbit (vs 100mbit on the Sony), raw video external recording, 13+ stops dynamic range, there's a lot to like! EDIT: Also nicer screen, joystick, 30fps stills, fuji colours, better app, cheaper.
Not to mention that the X-S20 has much better screen resolution, a joystick, can shoot 30fps stills (20 with unlimited jpegs), fuji colors, better app, and $550 cheaper where I live. The Sony wins on weather sealing, 4k 120p, slightly better viewfinder magnification, native iso and probably better af, but X-S20 is definitely better value where I live, and neither are pro level when it comes to the hardware.
@@johansphoto The 120fps 4K on the Sony is lower quality and with a 1.63x crop, it would be interesting to see side by side vs 1080p to see how good the 4K 120fps really is. But I would take 6.2k open gate and extra 2 stops of IBIS any day over 120fps 4K and just upscale my 240fps 1080p. No more explaining to my girlfriend why I refuse to film video in portrait now that I can crop the open gate footage for either landscape or her "instagram stories" 😂 - I'm sure the Sony AF is much better, but hoping Fuji's improvements make it "good enough". It is a close call though, both are great cameras. Fuji do tend to support their cameras much better though, my old X-T3 got the latest XApp where flagship A7S III cameras aren't receiving basic functionality that Sony added to their entry level cameras, shameful!
That's the camera that I was looking for back in 2020 😅 now that I have an A7SIII I'm definitely not coming back to that tiny form factor and I love the Full Frame look too much as well. Looks like a good camera though just a little bit expensive for a B cam at 1700€
I too have the a7Siii and recently bought the FF A7C as my B camera for 2 camera shoots. Better choice to match the sensor and colour science for me that the A6700. Don’t like the crop sensor and micro-hdmi.
Not sure if you could call this a B cam, since i have outperformed a lot of photographers hers with alot of gear with a 6300 just because my lenses were better and faster.
These bodies make no sense to me. Really don't understand why you wouldn't just get an older full frame? Seems kind of silly to get a $1400 crop body that will take exponentially worse photos than an a7ii at half the price?
The a7iv is full frame and this is APSC so they will have different capabilities. It takes more processing power to read out a full frame sensor than a smaller APSC sensor. It's comparing apples to oranges.
@@Hunselmann yes you are still comparing apples and oranges. Some of those have heavy crops and other have only 12mp sensors which are naturally 4k without needing to downsample or or any processing conversion versus a 33mp sensor that needs to do a lot of conversion. If you research the actual cameras, their sensors, the bit rates, the crop factors... Etc it'll be pretty obvious why they are how they are. That's not to say we won't see 4k120 in future full frame cameras but at the moment the only ones that do it are $4-5000. You won't find a single camera that doesn't sacrifice a bunch of quality to give 4k120 under that price point. But I think we will see it in cameras within the next year. Just not yet.
1 card slot? Come on man, what a waste of a nearly perfect competitor to Fuji. Really wanted a stills camera to pair with my fx30 at APS c but wanted a mechanical shutter. 1 slot rules it out for me.
Am I the only one that's a little let down by this? like the X-T4 from Fuji has two sd slots, better rated ibis, better screen, arguably worlds better firmware support. Even the X-S20 is better in those categories than the 6700. the only thing would be readout speed and autofocus. Wasn't this rumored to be the X-S20 and X-T5 killer?
Sony's recent camera designs have been very good. They look and handle like a tactical tool. The designs are very low profile and stealthy. I think the the black colored lens mounts are great.
3:56 im fucking baffled that my A7IV I bought that is $1000 more cant do 4k60 without crop but this camera can, I should've waited a few more months and bought this :(
I ordered the FX30 last night and was set into a state of panic after seeing the title of this. Thank god it has actually reconfirmed the FX30 was the right choice 😥
Same 😂 I’ve only had my FX30 a couple weeks. But no way in hell I would pay more just for AI when I would be losing dual cards, internal fan and HDMI out
If you work with documentaries/ reportage the tally lights of the FX30 are invaluable. Believe me you made the right choice if your main thing is video.
@@BenPatrikhey man, can you please give me some advice/try to sell me on the FX30 haha. I’m having such a hard time trying to decide between the a6700 and the FX30
I love the rangefinder style body, because it makes it so small and nothing stick out. It is just great for traveling and also when you want to put it on a smaller gimbal.
I'll be getting one, thanks to Tom Green. Okay because I'm an a6600 owner and this solves multiple issues, chiefly rolling shutter, lack of 10 bit video and uncompressed raw photos.
Hi Gerald, Great review as always. Have you done xyla 21 for xtrans 4? I believe not. And are you planning on reviewing x-s20? I would also like understand ISO scale differences between brand if you think that’s something worth covering someday.
I have waited 3 years for this to be released and I am honestly a little disappointed. The a6600 and the A6700 have the same EVF with 2.36 million dots. A6600 rear screen has 921,600 dot, A6700 has 1.04m dot. One card slot, again. I feel Sony could have really knocked it out of the park and could have charged us a premium and I would have paid it. If you are upgrading from an a6400 or a6500 then the A6700 is a no brainer. For me, I am more likely to jump to Fujifilm.
then buy the fx30, its a superior beast and has much more functions, options and buttons. Also it has superior and higher bitrates that you could access with the right card and a very good cpu.
@@alexhiguera8753 zero photo capabilities though. Single shot image capture. Correct me if I’m wrong but the Fuji H2S for instance uses the same 26MP Sony sensor and yet they can squeeze out 40fps and I think can do the same video quality as this A6700. Yes $1000 more expensive but shows what the sensor is capable of doing…
GH6 is better in almost every way except the body weight and auto focus,Even the price is very close,better cooling system for video,no crop high frame video ,cfe card,better inbody stabilizer....
That looks like a mighty fine improvement over the A6300s that I started working with. Those things were known to overheat quickly shooting 4k24p. It was so annoying. I’m honestly surprised that they came out with the FX30 before this guy, but I’m glad it exists to provide a workhorse option for video shooters.
the a6300 is an incredible camera, but yeah it overheats! and the low light performance isn't great. but its also like, $300! i'd be interested in seeing overheating and low light tests on this thing...
With the original sony kit lens:- Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Lens (Black) Sony E 55-210mm f/4.5-6.3 OSS Lens How good are those lens for low light ? Ofc am coming from a 1" sensor camera at 2.8 apt which kinda sux at low light... Will i see big improvement ?
@@antiseth3964 those lenses, but my concern was shooting for basketball games indoors well let and soccer matches with decent lighting at night, u think those lenses are good enough professionally shooting or no way around it I gotta invest in better ones ? Tha k you...
why on EARTH does a cheaper camera allow 4k 30 streaming, but my more expensive FX30 will only do 1080p? At this point im certain the people at Sony are smoking crack.
you gotta think about the market they’re targeting here. most people buying a 4k cinema camera aren’t using it to stream. and if you are streaming at that caliber, you are likely using an ATEM switcher. This is probably targeting streamers or smaller productions on a budget
@@williamhelena7592 the idea is my camera is the same sensor, better guts inside (or probably the same) and something as simple as a software feature they exclude from the more expensive camera, but put it in the less expensive camera. The fact of the matter is - USB streaming IS in the FX30 and FX3. These are "video" cameras. The A6700 is a "hybrid" camera. Not really meant for video, but there if you want it and takes really nice photos. They give THAT camera 4k 30fps streaming and leave us stuck at 1080. Yes, for more serious work with more than ONE camera - i would use an ATEM switcher. But what if I want one camera, one angle, plugged straight into my computer to get that stream? I only get 1080p? Its a video first camera. That makes no sense. The A6700 is not a video first camera, but when it comes to the USB Streaming option - suddenly it is now? Its about having the options. An option they can easily put into those cameras with a simple firmware update. But we all know how Sony likes to be with firmware updates to give us features thats on the camera that came out today, but not a camera that just came out 6 months ago.
Well, very impressive camera. I currently own 2 a6000s so, the lack of joystick won't be a problem for me. I'm going to enjoy the massive improvement of that video specs.
i trust your reviews more than anyone else. Sony is so cool for putting premium tech in pretty much any new body they design. The a6700 is reminiscent of the a6400 release whith a big leap in the chipset and af tech.
This is reminiscent of the a6400 release both coming out after an a7 release with much better tech. For me the real time tracking released in the a6400 was a giant leap that made sports and wildlife shooting way easier.
Why does almost every review of this camera say it uses the same "26MP" sensor as the FX30? Citation very much needed on this claim. The official specs for the FX30 say it has a 20.1MP sensor. So what exactly am I missing here?
I was excited about this camera until I found out there is only 1 card slot and no 6k. I wanted more megapixels but would have looked past that if it had more features. Sadly this may be a good camera but it's also very disappointing. Why can't Sony make an apsc camera that competes with Fujifilm. If Sony didn't have good auto focus this camera would completely lose to Fujifilm.
What about Fujifilm XS-20? It's cheaper than a6700 and have an amazing 6K in body video recording (4-2-2 10 bit) and outputs raw video via HDMI also has XT-4 sensor which is an amazing feat for photos with amazing colors. Might be a great rivalry between those two cameras
One feature that I like on the A7IV is the shutter closing when switched off to change lenses In practice I've found it really does help to keep the sensor clean. Does the A6700 have this option? I'm having trouble finding any reference to the feature.
Sony has accidentally FORGOTTEN to add 4k "30p" using HEVC on EVERY recent camera. They DO 24 frame then jump to 60 frame....forgetting 30p completely. Did Sony REMEMBER to add HEVC at 30p in this camera?
Best value of any camera to date? For the same money, I'll take the R7 all day over this. More resolution, better IBIS, better VF and LCD, 1/8000s shutter, faster electronic shutter, much faster continuous shooting, better battery life and most importantly, two card slots. Love Tom Green though 😃
I bought a fujifilm xs-20 a month ago for $1050 and a Tamron 17-70mm for $540. Photographed a wedding and photographed and filmed a colorado trip and it was great, but I just bought an A6700 on since I'm more comfortable on the Sony system
Might as well go to FF at this point...The only thing APS-C has been missing are compact quality primes like a 23mm F2 (35mm equivalent) and 18mm F2 (28mm equivalent) that can rival the size and performance of the offerings from Fuji and the Leica CL. People want compact inconspicuous bodies and lenses for everyday carry, street and travel.
Yes with Sony FF is the way to go. Especially with the A7C and the new small lenses least the Samyang Tiny series, negating any advantage the a6XXX-series had vs fullframe on Sony. For Aps-c Fuji is clearly a better choice with a much wider range of bodies and lenses, with the potential for a very small setup like the X-E4 plus 27 f2.8 or one of the f2 lenses, or a high end setup like the XH2 cameras, with high resolution screens and viewfinders, dual cardslots and great ergonomics. For midtier X-S20 holds its own against a6700, at a lower price and with a better lens selection.
Value champion? I wont be calling it that. - Same old evf - Same old LCD screen - Only 5 stop IBIS, even the older XS10 has 6 stops, Canon R7 has 7 stops - No joystick - Bad ergonomics All that for 1400$, I'm sorry but it sounds more valued if placed at 1200$ There are much better options in terms of photograhy for the same cost of a6700. You get Nikon Z6, A7III, which are FF and get awesome quality pictures.
Except for 4K 120, and unbeatable (so far) AF, the Fuji X-S20 (which I own) got you covered with overall better specs, for a much cheaper price, and noticeably more compact. As far as IBIS, Sony still didn't get the memo. The a6700 is already a has-been. End of story. If you want bigger (sensor), wait for the A7C II…only if you think it'll make you a better photographer/videographer.
I believe the price is almost the same? - but I just ordered my X-S20, the 6.2k open gate, extra 2 stops of IBIS, 360mbit and raw (Sony limited to 100mbit which is quite poor), the 4k60p USB webcam, no software needed, no overheat, ability to adjust aperture/colour profile in webcam mode is awesome - single cable for power and external recording! And the added bonus of my girlfriend will stop complaining that she can't crop my 16:9 videos for her portrait instagram stories thanks to 4:3 open gate :D
In America, yes. But in Europa no, when it comes to value champion. In America 1399 dollars... in Europa 1699 euro's! Which is almost 500 dollars more! insane
Im sorry, but you are wrong, This camera is terrible with overheating. Couldnt get more then 18 minutes in 4k 60. And on a sunny day outside even 4 24 overheated at 24 min. DONT WASTE MONEY
Somehow all Sony cameras look the same, whether from the Z-VE series, A7C or A6700. I think Sony doesn't need engineers anymore when the company runs a recycling center. And they look ugly and very uninspiring. A box with a grip - done. Mass production for the average customer.
wSolar Power My Boy, U Got It! Sony just heard u! Solar Power, Heat that Cam Up, Give it a Good Sun Tan! If you're a good DYI Fan Boy or Fan Gal, they have a full Bag of Tricks for U when u decide to Go Solar Power Test: Set the Cam Heat to High, Open the flip out screen---all the way out, open the battery door (so the lithium batteries can fall out & compete with Tesla's Plan to Save Planet Earth). Oh yeah, keep the SD Card Trap Door Open (so u can purchase many more cheap Sony Tough Cards & they can leave a trail as to where u were when you were shooting in the Alaskan wilderness & got lost for good). Solar Power, Solar Test, Forget Ambient Power, Let's Go Solar Power! We have 24 Hours of Sunlight now in the Arctic, Perfect Time to do That Solar Safari! 😎😎
The fact that it has an articulated screes and some a7r5 features I'm sooo tempted to upgrade from my a6600, I had a sony a7r5 for a couple of weeks and I loved it but dont want to switch to FF as I have to sell al my apsc lenses and FF glass its expensive. Now this camera came out❤
Sorry... Overheats like crazy. For wedding film makers, it's a NO-GO. Might be good if you don't need to shoot 4K for more than 10 minutes on a hot summer day outdoors.
@@MrFraiche good point, however when comparing zv-1 12mp ff to a6700 26mp apsc it's important to note the 4k oversampling which creates additional strain
This body will become my main travel shooting camera. I have a ZV E10 and ZV 1 (OG) already but I miss having the view finder for doing on the go photography while filming. This is an absolute must pick up for me.
You’re being very kind to this camera… If you gave it to me for free I would sell it immediately. And buy a real Camera. How about the Panasonic S5iix…. Infinitely superior!
Unfortunately it’s besmirched by the lack of the dynamic image stabilization, an anti consumer business practice, by artificially differentiating products through software. This would be fine if the firmware was purchasable separately but instead we have to buy an entirely separate camera body? Absolutely ridiculous and unsustainable by every metric!
I really hope they incorporate similar upgrades to the A7cII - i can not wait to grab that when it comes out. I've been on APS-C for years and I'm finally ready to get my first compact full frame.
If reports are correct, the 7cii is going to be far more expensive than the 6700 and might be more than the 7iv, which is crazy. All bets are off if Sony his price blunder
I am particularly interested in how the Fuji xS20 compares to the Sony a6700. Both seem like great cameras the question is which camera is better for which kind of person?
Petapixel reports a small crop at 4k60, and what is worse that it overheated in 26 minutes with oversampled 4k 24p in their test, so it might be worth checking out some more reviews. Especially from people with full production bocies but no ties to Sony.
Wow, some of these features sounded like the things that low-budget shooters would request to be implemented on cheaper bodies as well with everyone fully aware that no manufacturer would put those premium features into lower-priced cameras - until now. Very unexpected but awesome!
@@mattdebyl8806 X-S20 is also magnesium alloy and it has greatly improved AF. AF is still behind Sony, but not a big factor anymore. However, it also packs a joystick, twice as high screen resolution, 30 stills/second vs 11, much better JPEGs and colors sooc, more custom modes, a new much improved app, and not least better IBIS. Sony wins on weather sealing and native ISO, but I don't see it as a better camera, and where I live the price difference is $550 so going Fuji is a nobrainer.
@@mattdebyl8806hats not true, the X-S20 has an magnesium alloy body. LCD is 1,8 Mill pixel instead of 1,0 … AI Trackimg from the X-H2s …. to be continued…. 😂
Still wonder how this camera have the new menu layout, focus breath comp, Animal Eye AF, and ability to import LUT. Now a $1400 camera have all those feature that my $3500 A7sIII doesn't. Doesn't make any sense at all. 😮💨
a7iii is the same price, I dont understand Sony but its still better choice, but hopefully those new pointless cameras will drive down A7iii or even Iv prices
Re: a6700 overheating. The results from different channels are all over the map. My copy did quite well comparatively, but if you're considering purchasing this camera, I'd err on the safe side and go with the 40-50 minute results just to be safe. I talked with Jordan from PetaPixel and we tested almost identically and I got nearly an hour longer than him. Not sure how to explain that. 🤷♂ I'll test a retail copy when I can and update you. 👍
what other cameras would you recommend in this price range or cheaper?
With non stop stills/photography in climate of at least 79-85F, do you think that would cause the 6700 to overheat? We pre-ordered this camera but now doubting if it's a bad idea with the overheating that could happen if we use this for photography in locations with warmer climate/travel. The other reviews don't even mention the possibility of it overheating
I literally pre-purchased this camera after watching your review, then canceled after watching others - I wish this wasn't an issue because I would totally use this camera since it has a mechanical shutter - but for now I have to stick with the FX30
I’ve played it till the end, but please stop playing with the straptriangle like it is a lady part… 😮😂
Hey Gerald, I was wondering if you could help me out with this choice..I own a Fuji X-T5 and I love it but this new Sony A6700 looks really good to me, maybe even the rumored A7CII. But which one would be the smartest option? I mostly do cinematography and some photography. I know I also have to think about lenses, accesories, ect..Let me know if you have any tips! thanks!
I'm sorry .. that was simply the most random yet awesome surprise intro of any video, I have ever seen. Tom Green is a legend to put in mildly.
Agreed! This is hilarious and kind of amazing.
That was awesome.
But unfortunately no "my bum is on the table"
Speaking of random, the outro is gold
AGREED!!! hahaha
I was with the a6300 since a long time. Was almost ready to get the fx30 but the lack of specs for photography was bothering me ... Now we have almost everything I keed akd want with the a6700. Even if for vidéography the fx30 still a beast 😱
Just put a couple small rubber o-rings around the jangly triangles. They will pinch against the mounts and keep them from jangling. Does make them stick out sideways, but they remain flexible, so not an issue. I do it with all my Sonys.
Same here. Good move.
Bubble Gum & Glue, Oh yeah, get some piano wire while u are it too, Sony likes DYI Guys & Gals: Set the Heat to High, Open the Flip Screen-way out. Oh yes, keep the battery door open-Great to Lose Batteries & Help Sony's competition with Tesla Lithium-Save the Planet Policies. One more caveat: Keep the SD Card Slot Open Too. U can buy more cheap Tough Cards if they all fall out, but don't worry, your cam will stay somewhat cooler. Yeah, great Design Tech Sony Boys. We should all rush out and get at least three of these. One for right hand shooting, One for left hand shooting & a Spare in the Backpack! 😎😎
I just prefer to remove the jangly triangles. You can do that in a similar manner to removing a key ring, and you can put them back on when it comes time to trade-in/sell the camera
@@sambrumley_productions I use a camera strap occasionally, so I leave them on
Remove them and use peak design straps. Use them my self, a lot of accessories to them and removes the noise completely
This is why when new products are released your vids are the only ones I watch.
I give them 5/5 Jangly Triangles as well!😂
I refuse to move on from my A7siii. I mean, they have to give a firmware update eventually, right??
The overheating issue like on the release of A7iv all over again. Does Sony not test its cameras before releasing?!
Yo I just started really liking your channel and then Tom Green randomly does a cameo in the beginning of this video im already gonna watch , well, Now it's true love
So you would recommend an inspiring photographer starting to reach out and take clients this would be a good camera to start with?
in terms of just buying the fx30 Im not upset with them releasing a cheaper camera, i still think the fx30 hits what i wanted
Hi Gerald,
Please let me know if you had the chance to test HDMI out.
If you had it, are there any limitations?
I'm interested for monitoring, to have "Info Display" out in photo and video mode for all resolutions.
Thank you!
looks sweet, possible backup to my Sony a7iv
If you google for "dpreview video stills tool" - and you chose e.g. a6300 (4K UHD) vs a6700 (4K UHD), well, the a6300 footage is superior (at least to my eyes!)
The setup claims to be on same lens/aperture etc
So how can the much older a6300 produce better S35 4K video footage compared to this new a6700 is a mystery to me
Both APS-C bodies claim to produce 4K from oversampled 6K
However the a6300 is CMOS whilst the a6700 is BSI-CMOS. Could that be the difference?
As far as pixel bining goes - I m not sure what's the case for the a6300/a6700
Or could it be the case that this DPreview video tool isn't too reliable
So whats the Price?
Would love to see a head-to-head comparison of this vs the new Fuji X-S20!!
I'm gonna watch this first - and then I'll watch the other 100 reviews.
the proper way
first i'll watch the best.. then i'll watch the rest 😄
Mark, take your beautiful face out of here please, no looking over the fence!
Whelp, wasn’t expecting Tom Green to do a Gerald Undone intro, but here we are…😂😂😂
That was awesome!
Yea it was 😂
HOLY SH**! 😂😂😂
Don't worry Tom Cruise will be sporting one next time, actually three in the next Impossible camera missions! 😎😎
It might offer the best value compared to the FX30, but I hope they won't drop the firmware support as quickly as the A7Siii!
Best way to keep up with the best Sony technology is to stick to their cheapest cameras.
Plenty about the FX30 that’s superior still, like internal fan, dual card slots and full size HDMI out to name just a few. The FX30 is a workhorse, this camera simply is not.
@@BenPatrik True, but the FX30 is not really a hybrid either.
For video the FX30 is much better. Tally lights, full metal body, ergos, audio and cooling system.
The fact that a $1400 camera in their lineup has breathing compensation but a $5000 camera doesn’t is inane. They can no longer claim it’s because of the Cinema Line/Alpha Line divide either, since this is a photo-first camera.
This is what vloggers have been waiting for for years. Not the ev1. And the people who loved the a6000-series will be happy with the 10 bit 4:2:2, which was the weakest point of the camera. Definitely a winner.
At 1:47, that scroll wheel on the front of the grip sold it. Need no more information, well, I won't go that far. I love my a6600, was thinking of the ZV-E1, but the lack of EVF was a turn-off as I am more a still shooter, not the next George Lucas.
do people even vlog anymore? lmao
The original A6000 wasn't weak for me when I had it in 2015 to 2018. It was my pro gear for paid and volunteer jobs it was fantastic.
It's just another tool for jobs, it's what you do with tools you have and skills you know.
@@flat-out A camera limited to 100mbps 8bit 420 will be limited to very low budget and low paying jobs. You can't use it professionally with confidence. This version is at least viable for professional use.
and also the 4k 25p was the only useable option, since the 1080p was the worst hd i have ever seen in a videocamera in the last 10 years.
Still rocking the Sony 6300 to this day I remember nreally splurging on the 6600 when it launched BUT this, this is what ai had been waiting for. 10 bit color is all that sold me in this camera. Finally I can grade my Air2s and ground camera footage without much hassle.
I'm SO GLAD I just sold my 6+ year old Sony A6500 a couple weeks ago. I would have lost another couple hundred of dollars now that this monster has been released. As always great video sir!
May I ask how much did you sell it for?
@@erum.m I sold it at KEH for I think $450 or so in excellent plus condition. I upgraded to the Sony A7IV about 5 months ago, and had been using that Sony A6500 for over 6½ years or so.
@@travissmarionI still have one I’m using for real estate work. Should have sold it already! 😮
Hi Gerald, great review as usual, would you be doing a Fuji X-S20 review anytime soon? How do you think does it compare to this sony a6700?
Tom Green?!?!?
The fact that this camera has breathing compensation and the a7 SIII still doesn't is yet another slap in the face from Sony. Let's not forget that they're pushing new cameras into consumer's hands without investing in the longevity of their older "flagship" cameras. The more new cameras that come out with features the a7 SIII should have, the more I feel forgotten and disrespected by Sony.
TOTALLY !!!!!! 😡
Of course Sony aren't interested in the longevity of your camera. Sony are in this business to make money. They won't do that by making the camera you've already bought significantly better than it was when you bought it. It's not a slap in the face. It's a business model.
one of the reasons i sold my sonys.
Agreed!!!
@@ZeroFilmClips Not necessarily. We’re more likely to buy into the Sony ecosystem if we know our cameras will last. And you’re discounting lens sales. I haven’t bought the Sony 20mm G because my a7 SIII doesn’t have breathing comp.
If they added breathing comp to all of their more expensive flagship cameras those prosumers would spend more on glass. That would be a business decision that benefits the company.
But instead they insist on annoying their consumer-base and making them feel like their cameras have been forgotten.
i would really loved if you compared the dynamic range of the a6700 with the a6600
If youre asking mainly about the video dynamic range then theres no question the a6700 is better, considering it has 10bit 4:2:2 compared to a6600 only having 8bit. You can now properly make use of the SLog3 picture profile and get a better dynamic range.
When it comes to photos I think they would probably be the same with the a6600 but a6700 would slightly be better because it using a newer and better sensor with 2MP more.
Likely a pre-production model so wait for more detailed tests by DpReview, CineD, etc.
@@johndc7446 yes it's certain than a 10bit slog3 codec will give you better result than the 8bit slog2.
but i would a loved to see "how much" is it better. to see if it's really worth the upgrade :)
how many stops of DR are we talkin about, how many stops of lattitude under/over, etc.
How does it compare to the X-S20? - 6.2k open gate, 7 stops IBIS (2 more than Sony), 4k60 webcam for external recording and power with 1 cable (no drivers needed), 10bit 4:2:2 360mbit (vs 100mbit on the Sony), raw video external recording, 13+ stops dynamic range, there's a lot to like! EDIT: Also nicer screen, joystick, 30fps stills, fuji colours, better app, cheaper.
Not to mention that the X-S20 has much better screen resolution, a joystick, can shoot 30fps stills (20 with unlimited jpegs), fuji colors, better app, and $550 cheaper where I live. The Sony wins on weather sealing, 4k 120p, slightly better viewfinder magnification, native iso and probably better af, but X-S20 is definitely better value where I live, and neither are pro level when it comes to the hardware.
@@johansphotothere is only 100$ price difference. Not so much right
X-S20 is a really good package overall, but I still prefer AF of Sony than Fujifilm.
@@johansphoto The 120fps 4K on the Sony is lower quality and with a 1.63x crop, it would be interesting to see side by side vs 1080p to see how good the 4K 120fps really is. But I would take 6.2k open gate and extra 2 stops of IBIS any day over 120fps 4K and just upscale my 240fps 1080p. No more explaining to my girlfriend why I refuse to film video in portrait now that I can crop the open gate footage for either landscape or her "instagram stories" 😂 - I'm sure the Sony AF is much better, but hoping Fuji's improvements make it "good enough".
It is a close call though, both are great cameras. Fuji do tend to support their cameras much better though, my old X-T3 got the latest XApp where flagship A7S III cameras aren't receiving basic functionality that Sony added to their entry level cameras, shameful!
I don't think that comparison is going to happen since it's Sony. Even the S5II or X beats this Sony but it seems Sony has more clout.
It’s wild that a £2000 camera is considered a budget friendly option.
Right i looked up the price and was shocked this was being considered a budget camera
I agree the price is absolutely shocking! this camera should be priced around the 1,300 USD mark
@@AndiGomez-yu2dxFind another camera that can do 4k 120p 10bit at that price.
That's the camera that I was looking for back in 2020 😅 now that I have an A7SIII I'm definitely not coming back to that tiny form factor and I love the Full Frame look too much as well.
Looks like a good camera though just a little bit expensive for a B cam at 1700€
I too have the a7Siii and recently bought the FF A7C as my B camera for 2 camera shoots. Better choice to match the sensor and colour science for me that the A6700. Don’t like the crop sensor and micro-hdmi.
@@Pfagnan For now my B cam is a RX100 IV and still waiting for the RX100VIII to buy it 😂
@@unusualcomment9731 That’s a decent compromise. You can’t always get it all…
@@Pfagnan I'm waiting for a7Cii to pair with a7Siii, amazing how compact a7C is considering it's full frame
Not sure if you could call this a B cam, since i have outperformed a lot of photographers hers with alot of gear with a 6300 just because my lenses were better and faster.
These bodies make no sense to me. Really don't understand why you wouldn't just get an older full frame? Seems kind of silly to get a $1400 crop body that will take exponentially worse photos than an a7ii at half the price?
It's it right that I get 120p 4k with this little thing and with the A7 IV I get only 60p 4k ? If so... WTF?
The a7iv is full frame and this is APSC so they will have different capabilities. It takes more processing power to read out a full frame sensor than a smaller APSC sensor. It's comparing apples to oranges.
@@thisiseric Canon R5 is capable with 45 mp full frame. Sony A7 SIII and the FX 30 can do it. These are grapefruits then?
@@Hunselmann yes you are still comparing apples and oranges. Some of those have heavy crops and other have only 12mp sensors which are naturally 4k without needing to downsample or or any processing conversion versus a 33mp sensor that needs to do a lot of conversion.
If you research the actual cameras, their sensors, the bit rates, the crop factors... Etc it'll be pretty obvious why they are how they are.
That's not to say we won't see 4k120 in future full frame cameras but at the moment the only ones that do it are $4-5000. You won't find a single camera that doesn't sacrifice a bunch of quality to give 4k120 under that price point. But I think we will see it in cameras within the next year. Just not yet.
@@thisiseric hopefully
@thisiseric good explanations 👍
I'm here for the @TomGreen Cameo
1 card slot? Come on man, what a waste of a nearly perfect competitor to Fuji. Really wanted a stills camera to pair with my fx30 at APS c but wanted a mechanical shutter. 1 slot rules it out for me.
Am I the only one that's a little let down by this?
like the X-T4 from Fuji has two sd slots, better rated ibis, better screen, arguably worlds better firmware support. Even the X-S20 is better in those categories than the 6700. the only thing would be readout speed and autofocus.
Wasn't this rumored to be the X-S20 and X-T5 killer?
Sony's recent camera designs have been very good. They look and handle like a tactical tool. The designs are very low profile and stealthy. I think the the black colored lens mounts are great.
3:56 im fucking baffled that my A7IV I bought that is $1000 more cant do 4k60 without crop but this camera can, I should've waited a few more months and bought this :(
I ordered the FX30 last night and was set into a state of panic after seeing the title of this. Thank god it has actually reconfirmed the FX30 was the right choice 😥
Same 😂 I’ve only had my FX30 a couple weeks. But no way in hell I would pay more just for AI when I would be losing dual cards, internal fan and HDMI out
@@BenPatrik Indeed. Also considered the a6700 until I learned about the overheating. FX30 / FX3 are the way to go. Or the A7S3.
If you work with documentaries/ reportage the tally lights of the FX30 are invaluable. Believe me you made the right choice if your main thing is video.
Hi, can you please tell me why you would pick the FX30 over this? I’m so stuck trying to pick!
@@BenPatrikhey man, can you please give me some advice/try to sell me on the FX30 haha. I’m having such a hard time trying to decide between the a6700 and the FX30
I love the rangefinder style body, because it makes it so small and nothing stick out. It is just great for traveling and also when you want to put it on a smaller gimbal.
Nah... tired with the Sony trend.. new cameras instead of updating the current ones.
Still waiting on that A1 update
I'll be getting one, thanks to Tom Green. Okay because I'm an a6600 owner and this solves multiple issues, chiefly rolling shutter, lack of 10 bit video and uncompressed raw photos.
EVF and screen are complete garbage. Basically a camera for post processing enthusiasts only.
Great video ❤ However, I miss the rant about firmware updates for the a7siii and a1 😭
i was looking for it too!
@AlexanderHaibel maybe he got word it's on the way 🙏
Thanks for being possibly the only reviewer who tests dynamic range. Another great review.💯💯💯
Hi Gerald, Great review as always. Have you done xyla 21 for xtrans 4? I believe not. And are you planning on reviewing x-s20? I would also like understand ISO scale differences between brand if you think that’s something worth covering someday.
New camera: The first places I check is this channel, Phillip Bloom and Camera Conspiracies for the clean up.
The same channels I watch. Definitely the best I should add Armando Ferreira too!
@@evilpigskin he’s in the rotation for sure.
@@evilpigskin yea Armando is good, also Matt WhoisMatt & Tony&Chelsea
Long live Sony APS-C finally
I have waited 3 years for this to be released and I am honestly a little disappointed. The a6600 and the A6700 have the same EVF with 2.36 million dots. A6600 rear screen has 921,600 dot, A6700 has 1.04m dot. One card slot, again. I feel Sony could have really knocked it out of the park and could have charged us a premium and I would have paid it. If you are upgrading from an a6400 or a6500 then the A6700 is a no brainer. For me, I am more likely to jump to Fujifilm.
Which Fuji are you going to go with? XT series or H2S?
Yep I feel the same way
then buy the fx30, its a superior beast and has much more functions, options and buttons. Also it has superior and higher bitrates that you could access with the right card and a very good cpu.
@@alexhiguera8753 zero photo capabilities though. Single shot image capture. Correct me if I’m wrong but the Fuji H2S for instance uses the same 26MP Sony sensor and yet they can squeeze out 40fps and I think can do the same video quality as this A6700. Yes $1000 more expensive but shows what the sensor is capable of doing…
@@SouthAfricanWandererIt’s a stacked sensor with Fuji’s X trans colour filter pattern. So it’s completely different from the one in the Sony.
GH6 is better in almost every way except the body weight and auto focus,Even the price is very close,better cooling system for video,no crop high frame video ,cfe card,better inbody stabilizer....
That looks like a mighty fine improvement over the A6300s that I started working with. Those things were known to overheat quickly shooting 4k24p. It was so annoying. I’m honestly surprised that they came out with the FX30 before this guy, but I’m glad it exists to provide a workhorse option for video shooters.
the a6300 is an incredible camera, but yeah it overheats! and the low light performance isn't great. but its also like, $300! i'd be interested in seeing overheating and low light tests on this thing...
You think fx30 better than 6700?
With the original sony kit lens:-
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Lens (Black)
Sony E 55-210mm f/4.5-6.3 OSS Lens
How good are those lens for low light ?
Ofc am coming from a 1" sensor camera at 2.8 apt which kinda sux at low light...
Will i see big improvement ?
@@dronetheworld4k67 Both lenses may have a harder time with lower light environments, but Sony cameras are pretty good with noise in general.
@@antiseth3964 those lenses, but my concern was shooting for basketball games indoors well let and soccer matches with decent lighting at night, u think those lenses are good enough professionally shooting or no way around it I gotta invest in better ones ? Tha k you...
Petapixel and Gordan Laing both got under 30 mins of 4k 50 on the overheating so you must have a special unit
why on EARTH does a cheaper camera allow 4k 30 streaming, but my more expensive FX30 will only do 1080p? At this point im certain the people at Sony are smoking crack.
you gotta think about the market they’re targeting here. most people buying a 4k cinema camera aren’t using it to stream. and if you are streaming at that caliber, you are likely using an ATEM switcher.
This is probably targeting streamers or smaller productions on a budget
@@williamhelena7592 the idea is my camera is the same sensor, better guts inside (or probably the same) and something as simple as a software feature they exclude from the more expensive camera, but put it in the less expensive camera. The fact of the matter is - USB streaming IS in the FX30 and FX3. These are "video" cameras. The A6700 is a "hybrid" camera. Not really meant for video, but there if you want it and takes really nice photos. They give THAT camera 4k 30fps streaming and leave us stuck at 1080.
Yes, for more serious work with more than ONE camera - i would use an ATEM switcher. But what if I want one camera, one angle, plugged straight into my computer to get that stream? I only get 1080p? Its a video first camera. That makes no sense. The A6700 is not a video first camera, but when it comes to the USB Streaming option - suddenly it is now? Its about having the options. An option they can easily put into those cameras with a simple firmware update. But we all know how Sony likes to be with firmware updates to give us features thats on the camera that came out today, but not a camera that just came out 6 months ago.
Well, very impressive camera. I currently own 2 a6000s so, the lack of joystick won't be a problem for me. I'm going to enjoy the massive improvement of that video specs.
i trust your reviews more than anyone else. Sony is so cool for putting premium tech in pretty much any new body they design. The a6700 is reminiscent of the a6400 release whith a big leap in the chipset and af tech.
This is reminiscent of the a6400 release both coming out after an a7 release with much better tech. For me the real time tracking released in the a6400 was a giant leap that made sports and wildlife shooting way easier.
Why does almost every review of this camera say it uses the same "26MP" sensor as the FX30?
Citation very much needed on this claim.
The official specs for the FX30 say it has a 20.1MP sensor. So what exactly am I missing here?
16x9 vs 3x2. Sony told everyone that when giving them the press briefing, that's why.
I was excited about this camera until I found out there is only 1 card slot and no 6k. I wanted more megapixels but would have looked past that if it had more features. Sadly this may be a good camera but it's also very disappointing. Why can't Sony make an apsc camera that competes with Fujifilm. If Sony didn't have good auto focus this camera would completely lose to Fujifilm.
What, Tom Green? Is Gerald friends with him or something? lol
Wait Tom Green 😂😂😂
Gerald is a goat 🐐
What about Fujifilm XS-20? It's cheaper than a6700 and have an amazing 6K in body video recording (4-2-2 10 bit) and outputs raw video via HDMI also has XT-4 sensor which is an amazing feat for photos with amazing colors. Might be a great rivalry between those two cameras
One feature that I like on the A7IV is the shutter closing when switched off to change lenses
In practice I've found it really does help to keep the sensor clean.
Does the A6700 have this option? I'm having trouble finding any reference to the feature.
Sony has accidentally FORGOTTEN to add 4k "30p" using HEVC on EVERY recent camera. They DO 24 frame then jump to 60 frame....forgetting 30p completely. Did Sony REMEMBER to add HEVC at 30p in this camera?
Good point, and the only reason I’m still staying with Sony -S codec
I wonder which camera will get no updates - this or the FX30
The Sony cinema line and alpha lines are completely different departments. And as we have seen the cinema cameras get much much better support.
Best value of any camera to date? For the same money, I'll take the R7 all day over this. More resolution, better IBIS, better VF and LCD, 1/8000s shutter, faster electronic shutter, much faster continuous shooting, better battery life and most importantly, two card slots. Love Tom Green though 😃
I’ve been waiting so long for a hybrid aps-c, this was always gonna be my next camera once it came out unless fuji tempted me enough
I bought a fujifilm xs-20 a month ago for $1050 and a Tamron 17-70mm for $540. Photographed a wedding and photographed and filmed a colorado trip and it was great, but I just bought an A6700 on since I'm more comfortable on the Sony system
What a bummer they stick to this tiny body style. I wish they would have an Aps-c camera in an A7 style body
What about the Canon EOS R8?
Whoa, wha what?!?! Tom Green!
...
Oh yeah a camera review.
Might as well go to FF at this point...The only thing APS-C has been missing are compact quality primes like a 23mm F2 (35mm equivalent) and 18mm F2 (28mm equivalent) that can rival the size and performance of the offerings from Fuji and the Leica CL. People want compact inconspicuous bodies and lenses for everyday carry, street and travel.
Hello from Fujifilm ecosystem. We have plenty of those «23mm f/2» and pancake solutions and you’re welcome to join us :)
@@casualcoffeeshooter lol I might just be coming over. Waiting to see what they release.
Yes with Sony FF is the way to go. Especially with the A7C and the new small lenses least the Samyang Tiny series, negating any advantage the a6XXX-series had vs fullframe on Sony. For Aps-c Fuji is clearly a better choice with a much wider range of bodies and lenses, with the potential for a very small setup like the X-E4 plus 27 f2.8 or one of the f2 lenses, or a high end setup like the XH2 cameras, with high resolution screens and viewfinders, dual cardslots and great ergonomics. For midtier X-S20 holds its own against a6700, at a lower price and with a better lens selection.
I bought the A7C as a companion to my a7Siii. Only thing I really miss is the 10 bit video on 2 camera shoots.
@@Pfagnan Well A7C ii is already been verified coming out this year. So maybe it will have 10 bit.
Value champion? I wont be calling it that.
- Same old evf
- Same old LCD screen
- Only 5 stop IBIS, even the older XS10 has 6 stops, Canon R7 has 7 stops
- No joystick
- Bad ergonomics
All that for 1400$, I'm sorry but it sounds more valued if placed at 1200$
There are much better options in terms of photograhy for the same cost of a6700.
You get Nikon Z6, A7III, which are FF and get awesome quality pictures.
Except for 4K 120, and unbeatable (so far) AF, the Fuji X-S20 (which I own) got you covered with overall better specs, for a much cheaper price, and noticeably more compact. As far as IBIS, Sony still didn't get the memo. The a6700 is already a has-been. End of story. If you want bigger (sensor), wait for the A7C II…only if you think it'll make you a better photographer/videographer.
I believe the price is almost the same? - but I just ordered my X-S20, the 6.2k open gate, extra 2 stops of IBIS, 360mbit and raw (Sony limited to 100mbit which is quite poor), the 4k60p USB webcam, no software needed, no overheat, ability to adjust aperture/colour profile in webcam mode is awesome - single cable for power and external recording!
And the added bonus of my girlfriend will stop complaining that she can't crop my 16:9 videos for her portrait instagram stories thanks to 4:3 open gate :D
@@DigiDriftZone, In the UK, it's £1,449. Fuji is about £200 cheaper.
@@DigiDriftZone In the UK, it's £1449. Fuji is about £200 cheaper. The reasons you mentioned is enough to stay away from the A6700.
In America, yes. But in Europa no, when it comes to value champion.
In America 1399 dollars... in Europa 1699 euro's! Which is almost 500 dollars more! insane
Still no GPS. Sony thinks it's 1990s
Some cameras have GPS? What for exactly?
Im sorry, but you are wrong, This camera is terrible with overheating. Couldnt get more then 18 minutes in 4k 60. And on a sunny day outside even 4 24 overheated at 24 min. DONT WASTE MONEY
Always the first guy i go to when new cams come out👊
Somehow all Sony cameras look the same, whether from the Z-VE series, A7C or A6700. I think Sony doesn't need engineers anymore when the company runs a recycling center. And they look ugly and very uninspiring. A box with a grip - done. Mass production for the average customer.
For the overheating test, did you test with the camera in direct sunlight? I've found that matters just as much as ambient temperature.
wSolar Power My Boy, U Got It! Sony just heard u! Solar Power, Heat that Cam Up, Give it a Good Sun Tan! If you're a good DYI Fan Boy or Fan Gal, they have a full Bag of Tricks for U when u decide to Go Solar Power Test: Set the Cam Heat to High, Open the flip out screen---all the way out, open the battery door (so the lithium batteries can fall out & compete with Tesla's Plan to Save Planet Earth). Oh yeah, keep the SD Card Trap Door Open (so u can purchase many more cheap Sony Tough Cards & they can leave a trail as to where u were when you were shooting in the Alaskan wilderness & got lost for good).
Solar Power, Solar Test, Forget Ambient Power, Let's Go Solar Power! We have 24 Hours of Sunlight now in the Arctic, Perfect Time to do That Solar Safari! 😎😎
What about price?
The fact that it has an articulated screes and some a7r5 features I'm sooo tempted to upgrade from my a6600, I had a sony a7r5 for a couple of weeks and I loved it but dont want to switch to FF as I have to sell al my apsc lenses and FF glass its expensive. Now this camera came out❤
I cannot fathom why you chose this over the S5II which you crowned before Gerald nor the X20s from Fuji (albeit the APSC). Why Gerald, why?😂
great! another $55 camera to make my A1 feel bad
Sorry... Overheats like crazy. For wedding film makers, it's a NO-GO. Might be good if you don't need to shoot 4K for more than 10 minutes on a hot summer day outdoors.
Zv e1 have a massive overheating problems, how its possible that this camera have not
APS-C is less data to process.
@@MrFraiche good point, however when comparing zv-1 12mp ff to a6700 26mp apsc it's important to note the 4k oversampling which creates additional strain
Did I just see Tom Green in a Gerald Undone video? My mind requires an explanation sir.
This body will become my main travel shooting camera. I have a ZV E10 and ZV 1 (OG) already but I miss having the view finder for doing on the go photography while filming. This is an absolute must pick up for me.
You’re being very kind to this camera… If you gave it to me for free I would sell it immediately. And buy a real Camera.
How about the Panasonic S5iix…. Infinitely superior!
Looks like a great camera. I wish it had less rolling shutter.
Almost any Sony camera can be described this way
@@unn4medfeel1ng not since A7S III
@@cinematools9621 A7 IV and A7R V are pretty bad. Also some of ZV cameras, can't remember which of them.
A camera approved for cinema has almost twice as slow rolling shutter than this. The S1H. You really can't complain about 16ms.
@@unn4medfeel1ng zv-e10 has bad 4k rolling shutter because it's same 24mp sensor as in a6400 a6600, zv-e1 uses a7Siii sensor so no problems there
Unfortunately it’s besmirched by the lack of the dynamic image stabilization, an anti consumer business practice, by artificially differentiating products through software. This would be fine if the firmware was purchasable separately but instead we have to buy an entirely separate camera body? Absolutely ridiculous and unsustainable by every metric!
I really hope they incorporate similar upgrades to the A7cII - i can not wait to grab that when it comes out. I've been on APS-C for years and I'm finally ready to get my first compact full frame.
If reports are correct, the 7cii is going to be far more expensive than the 6700 and might be more than the 7iv, which is crazy. All bets are off if Sony his price blunder
How can you say it’s the best for the money when you have the XS 20 Fujifilm, with a much higher quality LCD and a better video specs for less money
Thank you for the great review! How would you compare this vs Fuji X-S20 vs Canon R7 for hybrid hikes & travels?
I am particularly interested in how the Fuji xS20 compares to the Sony a6700. Both seem like great cameras the question is which camera is better for which kind of person?
Petapixel tests on the camera reveal a significantly worse result when it comes to overheating. Around an hour of 4k24p and 30 mins of 4k 60p..
Time to upgrade my 4-year old a6500 😂
I guess my a6300 won't be alone now
$1400 is a bit high… Canon R8 can be a better choice…
Both options still high for 4k 60p when Panasonic had this for years… 🤷♂️
4k 60p apsc no crop with sony AF speed and AI under $1500 is more than enough for my production, lovely :D
Petapixel reports a small crop at 4k60, and what is worse that it overheated in 26 minutes with oversampled 4k 24p in their test, so it might be worth checking out some more reviews. Especially from people with full production bocies but no ties to Sony.
I see 6700 is 300€ more expensive than fuji xs20 😂in my home country germany and almost as expensive as a panasonic s5😜😜😜 so i will pass on this one.
Wow, some of these features sounded like the things that low-budget shooters would request to be implemented on cheaper bodies as well with everyone fully aware that no manufacturer would put those premium features into lower-priced cameras - until now. Very unexpected but awesome!
I’m mainly video, but I went with the 6700 over the fx30. Rather not have so many buttons and a bulkier camera 👍
With the Fuji X-S20, this is a very hard sale if you haven't invested into their lens system yet
@@mattdebyl8806 4K 120 on the 6700 has an additional crop...did you not even watch the review?
I’m Fuji XT2 stills shooter. Always jealous of Sony AI AF. How far apart is the XS20 vs A6700 AFC eye tracking ?
@@mattdebyl8806 X-S20 is also magnesium alloy and it has greatly improved AF. AF is still behind Sony, but not a big factor anymore. However, it also packs a joystick, twice as high screen resolution, 30 stills/second vs 11, much better JPEGs and colors sooc, more custom modes, a new much improved app, and not least better IBIS. Sony wins on weather sealing and native ISO, but I don't see it as a better camera, and where I live the price difference is $550 so going Fuji is a nobrainer.
@@mattdebyl8806hats not true, the X-S20 has an magnesium alloy body. LCD is 1,8 Mill pixel instead of 1,0 … AI Trackimg from the X-H2s …. to be continued…. 😂
Still wonder how this camera have the new menu layout, focus breath comp, Animal Eye AF, and ability to import LUT. Now a $1400 camera have all those feature that my $3500 A7sIII doesn't. Doesn't make any sense at all. 😮💨
This is ridiculous. All this could have been 10 years ago. and it's too expensive for such an offer.
a7iii is the same price, I dont understand Sony but its still better choice, but hopefully those new pointless cameras will drive down A7iii or even Iv prices
Would this be a good second camera when you already have an A7 III?
this is better lmao
dude this is going to smoke the a7iii all over..
@@TheHeartless917 i have the a7 iii and the a6700 will make it the b cam :D
@@TheHeartless917 Even in photos?
@@TheHeartless917 I agree = a6700 will smoke a7iii in videography, but when it comes to photography visual quality - a7iii is superior