How Did the Anschluss Actually Happen? | Why Austria Fell to Germany in 1938

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 247

  • @user-os2yp6ph2z
    @user-os2yp6ph2z 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +245

    It's almost like a trope throughout history. H1lter was from Austria, Napoleon from Corsica, Stalin from Georgia and so on..

    • @colindaniels945
      @colindaniels945 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      Except for one thing:
      Napoleon Bonaparte was Italian not French

    • @chiefchuck3897
      @chiefchuck3897 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@colindaniels945 and Stalin was Georgian, not Russian. And Hitler was Austrian, not (necessarily) German. Your point?

    • @Frd2004
      @Frd2004 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

      The difference is Austria is German cultural and historical, corsica and Georgia werent

    • @LookBackHistory
      @LookBackHistory  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +60

      Churchill was half- American. The founder of the current Swedish royal family was French. Catherine the Great was German.

    • @bcvetkov8534
      @bcvetkov8534 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@colindaniels945This is incorrect but okay to off I guess.

  • @colindaniels945
    @colindaniels945 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +222

    I'll quote History Matters:
    "Austria wanted to be part of Germany, just not THAT Germany."

    • @jonoc3729
      @jonoc3729 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      Most austrians supported unification, even with Hitler's Germany.

    • @colindaniels945
      @colindaniels945 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      @@jonoc3729 The fascist government prior to Anschluss didn't.
      In fact, they even allowed opposition parties,after banning them years earlier,on the condition that they oppose the Nazis.
      Even the video points that out

    • @wolfgang6517
      @wolfgang6517 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@jonoc3729 source?

    • @occam7382
      @occam7382 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I see you are a man of culture.

    • @mnd9166
      @mnd9166 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@colindaniels945 Yeah because Austrofascists were clerical, civic nationalist, anti-socialist and werent big on racism except Jews. Austrofascists werent even proper corporatists in economic manner, they practically copied things were they thought might work but never had the philosophical nor the ideological reasons behind them.

  • @mypropmp4057
    @mypropmp4057 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Bold and respectable decision for you to use the swastika despite TH-cam’s censoring spree! Please, continue the amazing work!

    • @LookBackHistory
      @LookBackHistory  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      To be fair to TH-cam, I think its mostly TH-camrs themselves imposing that sort of censoring. TH-cam's automated systems tend to flag videos like this (limiting potential income) but everything I've ever requested a manual review on has been approved swiftly.

  • @marcelbork92
    @marcelbork92 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

    How did it "happen"? Two German divisons crossed unopposed the "border" and marched straight to Vienna, being greeted and welcomed all the way through with cheers and flowers. That was it.

    • @nexxuzthenoble
      @nexxuzthenoble 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      annexion

    • @zerosuitsamus2340
      @zerosuitsamus2340 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Welcome to Black Prade

    • @SkalliDE
      @SkalliDE 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@nexxuzthenoble unification

    • @nexxuzthenoble
      @nexxuzthenoble 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SkalliDE that's how hitler called it. Are you a hitler lapdog? A foreign military marching into another independent country is an invasion country

    • @AEIOU05
      @AEIOU05 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      What you forgot was the government being couped and Brownshirts staging riots in every city. Nazi germany wanted either a pro Nazi government to take power or spin the narrative that the current Austrian government was no longer able to handle the riots and instability. In the end they got their wish and Schuschnigg resigned, however they still went ahead with the invasion anyway (probably because they wanted to test their logistics). Also it wasn’t only two divisions but the entire 8th army marching into Austria

  • @NathanS__
    @NathanS__ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +114

    Saying Austria was separate from Germany for centuries is just plain incorrect. At best you can date Austria's separation to the rest of Germany to 1866 when Prussia broke the German Confederation, which the Austrian Emperor was President.
    Protestant Prussia purposely pushed catholic Austria away so Prussia could unite Germany and then the Habsburgs tried to stay independent from the Hohenzollern Germany so the Habsburgs would remain an imperial power.
    The idea that Austrians are not German at all is a post WWII idea.

    • @inactiveaccount
      @inactiveaccount 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      austria was independent way before 1866

    • @10Tabris01
      @10Tabris01 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      @@inactiveaccount So was every other state in Germany. Doesn't change the fact that an Austria led unified Germany was a real possibility until the German Brothers War

    • @inactiveaccount
      @inactiveaccount 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@10Tabris01 no austria became independent during the habsburgs germany was still part of the hre, also austrians not being the same as germans isn’t a ww2 concept it is a fact if you look at a genetic map of europe you can see that austrians have a 25% slavic part in their genes that germans and swiss don’t have because of the austro hungarian empire, austrians are genetically more similar to hungarians than they are to germans, an austrian german unification only became possible because austrians wanted to be a part of an empire after the fall of austria hungary since austria went from being one of the richest countries to one of the poorest in europe after ww1, austria and austrians accepted the fact that their a small country and are happy to be an independent country after ww2

    • @janzjenau8400
      @janzjenau8400 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      ​@@inactiveaccountWtf are you even saying? Austria became independet, while Germany was still part of the HRE? Austria was a part of the HRE to the very last day. Nearly every HRE emporer was an austrian Habsburg, including the last Emporer. After the Vienna congress Austria was also part of the german confederation and the austian Emporer was literally the president of said german confederation. Austria was THE most important german state and if you told anyone in the 19th century that Austria wasn't as german as Prussia, Hannover or Baden they would have laughed in your face.

    • @inactiveaccount
      @inactiveaccount 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@janzjenau8400 learn history not olaf scholz (propaganda) history austria got independent because prussia didn’t want vienna to be the capital of the hre austria gained its independence in the 1000s germany was still a part of the hre there

  • @colindaniels945
    @colindaniels945 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    Yes Mussolini was against the German takeover of Austria, mainly because he had his own designs on it.
    He went along with it for 2 reasons:
    1. He had no desire to piss off Hitler.
    2. He saw Germany as the leading power in Europe at that point

    • @amogus948
      @amogus948 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No, it was because France and GB opposed his invasion and conquest of Ethiopia and sanctioned him (even though the sanctions were not really strictly enforced and were short lived)
      This opposition left Italy with no "allies" at the time and so Mussolini seeked closer cooperation with Germany given H*tler's rivalry with London and Paris
      Mussolini in 1938 (or in 1939 for what it matters) neither was scared of Germany nor it considered it the strongest power in Europe

    • @colindaniels945
      @colindaniels945 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@amogus948 Not according to the History Matters video on the world wide view of Anschluss, unless you have a source that says differently

    • @italianmapperchris3168
      @italianmapperchris3168 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@colindaniels945 Mussolini was in an alliance with Britain and France against German expansion, which included an annexation of Austria. It was called the Stresa Front. However, as it has been mentioned this quickly fell apart mostly due to the Italian invasion of Ethiopia, which ended Italy’s close relations with Britain and France, which led to Italy’s international isolation and subsequent reapprochement with Nazi Germany.
      If you want sources there is “Mussolini: A New Life by Nicholas Farrell”. It is also briefly touched upon by “Fascism in Europe 1919-1945 by Phillip Morgan”. If
      you want a primary source you can check out the personal diary of Italy’s foreign minister Galeazzo Ciano. You can see in the starting years of his diary how he slowly drifts away from seeing cooperation with Britain as viable and starts to Germany as a more fruitful ally.

    • @hansulrichboning8551
      @hansulrichboning8551 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Mussolini needed support from Hitler. Hitler offered support and granted the italian posession of south tyrol, but he demanded from Mussolini to drop austria.

  • @TheMexxodus
    @TheMexxodus 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    Amazingly Schuschnigg was arrested after the Anschluss and imprisoned in a concentration camp. And survived. He was liberated by the Americans in 1945. After the Second World War he went to the United States, became a professor of constitutional law at the University of St. Louis and acquired American nationality. In 1968 he returned to Austria, but did not enter politics again. Kurt Schuschnigg died in November 1977, four weeks before his 80th birthday.

    • @JustAPintOfMilk
      @JustAPintOfMilk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yeah i dont see him having much political support in austrian after his huge political failures and him selling off austria to the germans.

    • @shelbynamels973
      @shelbynamels973 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      that's amazing. I did not know that.

    • @valerietaylor9615
      @valerietaylor9615 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's interesting. Actually, I never even thought of what happened to him after the Anschluss. 🇦🇹

    • @christopher9727
      @christopher9727 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven
      There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today
      Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell
      Come to Jesus Christ today
      Jesus Christ is only way to heaven
      Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void
      Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today
      Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today
      Holy Spirit Can give you peace guidance and purpose and the Lord will
      John 3:16-21
      16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
      Mark 1.15
      15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
      2 Peter 3:9
      The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
      Hebrews 11:6
      6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
      Jesus

    • @aleksandarvil5718
      @aleksandarvil5718 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Just like Alexander Kerensky being Professor in Saint Louis AFTER exiling Russia coz of Red October !!!

  • @davidbraccini4770
    @davidbraccini4770 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    The reason why Mussolini approved the annexation of Austria, besides the alliance after the Ethiopian war, was because Hitler promised that he would renounce all claims to south Tyrol and even relocate all of its inhabitants who didn’t want to stay in Italy. Even after the eight of September 1943 and the subsequent german occupation of Italy Germany kept its promise and still never formally annexed South Tyrol.

    • @skthalange
      @skthalange 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yet they still speak German there with an Austrian accent!

    • @davidaxelos4678
      @davidaxelos4678 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@skthalangeYet what is Your point?🙄

    • @valerietaylor9615
      @valerietaylor9615 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Although South Tyrol in technically part of Italy, most of the inhabitants are German speakers, and not very happy about being Italian citizens.

  • @nicolasmarazuela1010
    @nicolasmarazuela1010 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Austria was forced to left the German Federation in 1866. At this point Austria wasn't even seperated a century from "Germany".

  • @shelbynamels973
    @shelbynamels973 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    There is a video on here that recounts the months of early '38 to the conclusion of the Anschluss. Hitler had von Schussnig come to the Berghof and both subtly and overtly pressured him into agreeing to it.
    Austrian politics between the wars was a bloodsport, very much unlike the laid-back, easy going stereotype most of the world has of Austrians. Contrasted with the stability during the reign of the Emperor, the years following 1918 were very tumultuous. Political leaders were assassinated, and political factions fought in the streets.
    A lot of Hitler's appeal was in the fact that the population in both Germany and Austria were fed up with the unrest and political violence and longed for a stable government.

    • @valerietaylor9615
      @valerietaylor9615 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Hitler managed to browbeat Schussnig into resigning as Chancellor of Austria, by refusing to let him smoke ( Adolf didn't let anyone smoke in his presence). After several hours, Schussnig was jonesing for a cigarette so badly, that his finally gave in and resigned. Or so Adolf claimed.

  • @dirufanboy1971
    @dirufanboy1971 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Austria: I really didn't want to, but then I saw that little moustache and I just couldn't resist.

  • @FulmenTheFinn
    @FulmenTheFinn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    0:15 Austria had NOT been separate from Germany for hundreds of years. Until 1866 the German Confederation, which included the German-speaking parts of Austria, and then some (most notably Bohemia and Moravia), was essentially synonymous with Germany. Hence why you have things like the German Civil War being another name for the Austro-Prussian War of 1866. Vienna had been the de facto capital of Germany for centuries, with the HRE becoming synonymous with the concept of Germany in the Middle Ages. To quote Wikipedia:
    "From 1250 onward, the association between "Germans" and the whole Empire became stronger. [...] At the same time, the replacement of Latin with German in official documents entrenched the German character of the empire at large. In 1474 the term "Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation" appeared, becoming more common after 1512. However, even after 1560, only 1 in 9 official documents mention "Germany", and most omitted the rest as well and simply called it "the Empire". In 1544 the Cosmographia (Sebastian Münster) was published, which used "Germany" (Teütschland) as synonymous with the empire as a whole. Johann Jacob Moser also used "German" as a synonym for "Imperial". This conflated definition of "German" even included non-German speakers.[39]"
    During the 1848 nationalist revolutions throughout the German Confederation, the German nationalists naturally wanted to make the Austrian Emperor, Franz Joseph I, the Emperor of Germany. He turned it down, only for them to then offer it to the King of Prussia, Friedrich Wilhelm IV, who also turned it down. The latter saw Austria as the leader of Germany, and did not want a Germany separate of Austria.
    "Emperor Franz Joseph I of Austria had made it clear in November 1848 that he would not accept the title of "Emperor of the Germans" from the Frankfurt National Assembly because the Frankfurt Constitution would have required German-speaking Austria to have a separate constitution, government and administration from the rest of the Empire.[59] On 28 March 1849, the Assembly elected Frederick William IV as Emperor of the Germans, but he refused the crown. In a letter to a confidant, he wrote: "I can call God to witness that I do not want it, for the simple reason that Austria will then be separated from Germany.""
    Austria being something separate from Germany only really came about as an idea c. 1866-1871, and even then it was flimsy at best for the next nearly 100 years, as witnessed by the Austrian desire to join Germany in the aftermath of WW1 and during the interbellum before WW2. I'd even make the case that the first widely spread Austrian identity separate from that of Germany only became a thing when the first post-WW2 generations began reaching adulthood in the 1960s and 1970s.

    • @ryanhassett4720
      @ryanhassett4720 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Finally someone gets it. Austria was not some distant independent German state it only stayed independent when the empire formed because of its own empire

    • @wolfgang6517
      @wolfgang6517 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Ah yes, the famous German confederation of Germans that includes…. Poles, Czechs, Dames, Belgians and Lithuanians.
      Almost as if politics doesn’t care about language

    • @FulmenTheFinn
      @FulmenTheFinn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@wolfgang6517 It seems you've somehow managed to completely miss the point of the post you're replying to.

    • @MuiltiLightRider
      @MuiltiLightRider 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I think what he means is that Germany and Austria were never unified under one centralized state since the HRE and German Confederation were very decentralized

    • @wolfgang6517
      @wolfgang6517 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@MuiltiLightRider Germany as a nation state is a completely modern invention

  • @colindaniels945
    @colindaniels945 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Also,if History Matters is right, the only country to publicly condemn Anschluss was Mexico.
    But given where Mexico was in relation to Germany and the fact that it was Mexico, it was pretty much ignored

  • @colindaniels945
    @colindaniels945 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I'm a bit surprised that you didn't mention the Stresa Front.
    For those who may not know, the Stresa Front was a treaty/agreement between Italy, France, and the UK signed in 1933/1934.
    It was an agreement between the three aforementioned countries to protect/guarantee Austrian independence as they knew Hitler had his eye on the place.
    Sadly, the Stresa Front went down the toilet in 1935 when Italy invaded Ethiopia.

  • @oliverschulte9659
    @oliverschulte9659 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Mistake right in the beginning of the video: Austria was not separate from Germany since hundreds of years. Austria was one of the various German states who first formed the Holy Roman Empire until year 1806 and then the German Confederation from 1815 to 1866. It was only in 1866 that Austria was forced by Prussia to go separate ways. The German Federation ended in a war between its states with Prussia and its Northern allies winning and forcing the others under their rule, then calling the whole new thing "Germany". But Austria was explicitly excluded. It is a bit like as if the US Union had excluded Texas from the US after the Civil War in 1865. Back to the mistake in the video: Austria got kicked out of Germany in 1866, wanted to rejoin in 1919 (after WW1) and finally was semi-voluntarily joining Nazi-Germany in 1938.

  • @Abrar.Rahman.Nafim.44
    @Abrar.Rahman.Nafim.44 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    Austria Painter Conquering His Own Country 💀

    • @dsxa918
      @dsxa918 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If i'm correct, it's not my theory but rather interperetation - it has to all even out and 'this' cursory observation is how it plays out sometimes

  • @Reichsritter
    @Reichsritter 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    what? they had been separate since 1866, that's 72 years not "hundreds of years "

  • @glitchy6449
    @glitchy6449 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Using the double headed eagle as the official coat of arms was a chad move, it's just so iconic!

  • @michaelowino228
    @michaelowino228 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Good video.

  • @semsemeini7905
    @semsemeini7905 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    My family were Austrian nationalists. Supporters of the Habsburgs. Fortunately they fled before March 12th, 1938.

  • @gtaquizmaster
    @gtaquizmaster 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thankss for making this

  • @arielest6749
    @arielest6749 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    4:48 image goes hard

  • @quedtion_marks_kirby_modding
    @quedtion_marks_kirby_modding 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great vid.
    Only small issues is that the social democratic party logo you used is the post war logo.

  • @Julian-tf5rb
    @Julian-tf5rb 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Not all Austrians wanted the Anschluß. My grandparents were just those type of Austrians. My Grandfather was more loyal to the old Austro-Hungarian union. When WW1 ended and the A-H empire ceased to be, he took his family and got out.

    • @LookBackHistory
      @LookBackHistory  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Absolutely. Cool to hear about your family history!

    • @Julian-tf5rb
      @Julian-tf5rb 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @LookBackHistory Truth be told, there's a lot more to the story then what I told you. But long story, short.... that's how my fathers sidebof the Fam ended up in America.

    • @ElfenThorne
      @ElfenThorne 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We literally have the same story, My grandfather also left after the annexation.

    • @AEIOU05
      @AEIOU05 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Modern estimates divide the approval by 3. One third was in favor of the annexation, one third against and one third was undecided. When Germany took over and promised economic growth and prosperity the undecided third got swayed. When the war started to go badly, many Austrians became disillusioned with being part of Germany, which is reflected with Austrian born soldiers being more willing to capitulate than their comrades from the „altreich“.

    • @icyplatinum1701
      @icyplatinum1701 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AEIOU05 Just reminds me of my grandparents. Both were convinced Nazis until the very end and during the war they were seen as heroes by their village. The second the war ended they were branded as traitors and were isolated and excluded from everything.
      It really shows that the vast majority of people spreading the whole „Austria was always German and a separate identity is a new concept“ just aren’t Austrians themselves and don’t know what the word nuance means.

  • @natheriver8910
    @natheriver8910 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very interesting

  • @lucianoosorio5942
    @lucianoosorio5942 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    “This enraged the Allies, who punished Germany severely.” Oversimplified
    Winston Churchill: I was saving the planet from an Axis of Darkness, while you were back home opening National Parks! Yes!

    • @ewn_edits
      @ewn_edits 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Genius reference! 👏

    • @FictionHubZA
      @FictionHubZA 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Erb and oversimplified referrences. Noice.

  • @jonnyminogue
    @jonnyminogue 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Another good video about the, as History Matters says, the “toothbrush mustache having Austrian man”

  • @hellheaven-dy2bz
    @hellheaven-dy2bz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The moustache man eanted to incoperate his country back

  • @theconqueringram5295
    @theconqueringram5295 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It was pretty strait forward.

  • @TeunisD
    @TeunisD 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looking at Dolfus of Austria in 1934 he must have been a Papal-Italian vassal.

  • @KrokLP
    @KrokLP 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Austria was part of Germany until the German Confederation was ended in 1856 and a customs union continued to exist long after. That's not "hundreds of years" before the Anschluß, but 82. And 18 years since the last loud calls for unification were forcibly suppressed by the Entente. And yeah, Hitler from even before taking power was solely focused on war and taking over the world. Seriously??

  • @sanwan7138
    @sanwan7138 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    No cell phone tv etc. Folks were hungry for sensationalism

    • @christopher9727
      @christopher9727 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ....
      Do you know Jesus Christ can set you free from sins and save you from hell today
      Jesus Christ is the only hope in this world no other gods will lead you to heaven
      There is no security or hope with out Jesus Christ in this world come and repent of all sins today
      Today is the day of salvation come to the loving savior Today repent and do not go to hell
      Come to Jesus Christ today
      Jesus Christ is only way to heaven
      Repent and follow him today seek his heart Jesus Christ can fill the emptiness he can fill the void
      Heaven and hell is real cone to the loving savior today
      Today is the day of salvation tomorrow might be to late come to the loving savior today
      Romans 6.23
      For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
      John 3:16-21
      16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
      Mark 1.15
      15 And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.
      2 Peter 3:9
      The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
      Hebrews 11:6
      6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
      Jesus

  • @edwinsparda7622
    @edwinsparda7622 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Austria has been part of Germany for centuries until 1866. It's people wanted to join a centralized unified germany (but its leaders thought otherwise). Austria rejoining germany would be like Northern ireland rejoining the republic of ireland.

    • @neversarium
      @neversarium 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @edwinsparda7622 better yet, Austria was ruling Germany for centuries.

  • @Imperium83
    @Imperium83 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why Austria "Fell" to Germany in 1938.... that's an interesting way to put it....

  • @lapizlizard65
    @lapizlizard65 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Social democrats are not socialists, even if there party name may claim it. Whil some social democratic parties expressed a wish to "reform" into socialism, none of them ever did. therefore, calling the SDAP the "Socialist Left" is midly misleading. Socialism is when the workers own the means of production. Social democracy is when a welfare state is in place, which taxes and spends according to the welfare of the people. These are not the same, and most social democrats at the time knew this, especially given the german revolution emphasised the split between the reformist SPD and the socialist OSPD and ASPD.

  • @Tympson1
    @Tympson1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I see my hometown in the first picture, I click like :D

  • @Hunter-cx6
    @Hunter-cx6 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    *Ballot paper: YES. Shot me.*

    • @LookBackHistory
      @LookBackHistory  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It definitely made clear what you were supposed to vote for...

  • @JohnParks-zc1pn
    @JohnParks-zc1pn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    11:15 The vote was not rigged. That view is part of the Victim Myth invented after the war.

  • @anillo.english
    @anillo.english 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The name Nazi doesn't come directly from Nationalsozialismus. It comes from the German name Ignaz, which comes from the Latin name Ignatius. Back in the 1920-1930s, Ignaz was a very popular name in southern Germany, especially Bavaria, and it was associated with common folks and peasants. The diminutive of Ignaz is Nazi. So, if you wanted to make fun of someone for being poor and you spoke German in the early 1900s, you would call the person Ignaz or Nazi. So when the National Socialists came to power, the German people originally started making fun of their name by shortening it to Nazi.

    • @shelbynamels973
      @shelbynamels973 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Pretty far-fetched, and not the way that I heerd it.

    • @anillo.english
      @anillo.english 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@shelbynamels973 this is taken from the Oxford English Dictionary:
      Etymology: Nazi (c1920), shortened Nationalsozialist or Nationalsozialistisch (see National Socialist adj. and n.). Compare French Nazi (1930). The spelling with z probably arose by analogy with Sozi (shortened Sozialist socialist n. and adj.).
      The term was originally used by opponents of the National Socialist German Workers' Party and was influenced by the Bavarian term Nazi, a familiar form of the proper name Ignatius or Ignaz and used to refer to or characterize a peasant or an awkward or clumsy person.

    • @shelbynamels973
      @shelbynamels973 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@anillo.english I'd go along with the explanation in your first paragraph.
      The explanation based on the vernacular seems suspect. I have never heard that before.
      I'm inclined to believe that somehow = maybe even as a joke - it made its way into an academic publication, and since subsequent edition update with new information, but don't bother with checking the veracity of existing definitions, the explanation you provide may have just continued without ever being questioned.
      It's something that happens not infrequently. Unless somebody bothers to go back to original sources, errors take on a life of their own.

    • @valerietaylor9615
      @valerietaylor9615 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      "Nazi" is indeed short for Ignaz, a name that was always popular in Austria and the South German Catholic States. Probably because of Saint Ignatius Loyola, a Catholic saint and founder of the Jesuit order.

    • @maikatideibaskapanaumrqlatupa
      @maikatideibaskapanaumrqlatupa 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@anillo.english this makes absolutely zero sense and it's the first time I've heard anything like it

  • @lythd
    @lythd 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    important to note is that support for anschluss fell after hitlers rise to power

  • @reichsritter8955
    @reichsritter8955 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Austrian are Germans. They belong mostly to the Bavarian tribe. In November 1918 the German-Austrian Parliament decide to join the Deutsches Reich which was forbidden by the Entente.

  • @AdmiralBonetoPick
    @AdmiralBonetoPick 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If I could constructively critique your delivery style, the way you draw out and emphasise the first syllable of every sentence makes it seem like you are straining to get the words out, or struggling to make up your mind over what you are about to say - as if every sentence is preceded by laboured um-ing and ah-ing.

  • @larkatmic
    @larkatmic 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ever wonder why Germany never took Switzerland?

    • @Rotebuehl1
      @Rotebuehl1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They didn't dare to even try😅

    • @larkatmic
      @larkatmic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Rotebuehl1 Exactly!

  • @incumbentvinyl9291
    @incumbentvinyl9291 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1:28 - Sure they were.
    They proved this at the end of the decade.

  • @micahistory
    @micahistory 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    interesting, never saw anyone explain the details that led up to this event before

    • @LookBackHistory
      @LookBackHistory  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nor had I, hence...

    • @micahistory
      @micahistory 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@LookBackHistory thanks, your channel is great

  • @billscannell93
    @billscannell93 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hitler should have stopped with Austria. He had brought his homeland into the new empire. He could have lived out the rest of his life as a great German hero and built amazing buildings with Speer, without a shot being fired.
    He also should have given up the insane, inexplicable hatred of Jewish people...but that was at the core of it, wasn't it.

  • @maxdautel2217
    @maxdautel2217 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ur video title is wrong, makes no sense

  • @ogerpinata1703
    @ogerpinata1703 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The unification of our Germanic lands is a must. If done the proper way.
    Last time we lost half our country to countries who have always viewed us with suspicion or hatred.
    That's where Bismarck succeeds and moustache man fails.
    Long lasting results against a world that wants us subdued or eradicated.
    The way it should have been will never come nor will it ever come again.
    At least within the United States of Europe will we be part of one nation again.
    Maybe then we all can let go of old baggage.

  • @poorfinnishpeasant911
    @poorfinnishpeasant911 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Imagine saying nazis and fascists are the same when history showed that if intrests collide, fascists are ready to wage wat against nazis.

  • @nusantaranbrony7283
    @nusantaranbrony7283 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Because they can deploy 400 thousand active troops

  • @liberalizzzm4908
    @liberalizzzm4908 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    8:16 wtf are you talking about 😭😭😭

  • @callnight1441
    @callnight1441 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    slight correction: the shortening "N*zi" comes from the German pronunciation of the word "National" (pronounced "Nah-tsio-nahl")

    • @janzjenau8400
      @janzjenau8400 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Socialist = shot form "Sozi"
      National Socialist = short form "Nazi"
      That's where it comes from.

  • @bryant-fr7sr
    @bryant-fr7sr 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    They wanted and they got what they wanted

  • @corneliussulla9963
    @corneliussulla9963 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Spam crap

  • @ernst...
    @ernst... 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ... heim in s Reich? ... nach Österreich ...

  • @kayhoorn
    @kayhoorn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Imagine calling your nation 'Eastern empire' aka Österreich. They always knew they belonged to the Germanic tribe. Vienna is an eastern outpost.

    • @fabianauer1986
      @fabianauer1986 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It means easter realm. Austria started as a small province and not as a empire

  • @kgius7434
    @kgius7434 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    because nobody helped, the Italians betrayed us

    • @janzjenau8400
      @janzjenau8400 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Help with what? The Austrians literally wanted to join the rest of Germany after ww1, even naming their country "Republic of German Austria" and the second sentence in their self choosen consitiution was "Austria is a part of the Republic of Germany. The only reason they didn't was because the Entente forced them not to. They also forced them to change their name into the "Republic of Austria". If any foreign powers intervened against the Anschluss the Austrians would have fought side by side with the other Germans against that enemy.

    • @Lockfly
      @Lockfly 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Italy only didn't want the annexation in the first place because they wanted to take Austria first lol

    • @kgius7434
      @kgius7434 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@janzjenau8400 that resulted due to the political and economic situation after loosing 90% of the Empires territory. but in general election the Austrian nationalist party which opposed the Anschluss kept on winning the elections until the 1970s.

    • @kgius7434
      @kgius7434 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Lockfly never heard of that, but would have been great to reunite with south tyrol and the Austrian coastlands .

    • @musicsayer1895
      @musicsayer1895 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@janzjenau8400But the Fatherland Front (VF) is anti-nazi! Reasonable for them to deny the reunion at that time. And to be honest there were many Austrians agreeing on the reunion in hope of economy, but not nationalism.

  • @nexxuzthenoble
    @nexxuzthenoble 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    *annexed

  • @torinjones3221
    @torinjones3221 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It happened because Austria voted to join Germany.

  • @patrickjeffers7864
    @patrickjeffers7864 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    99% of the vote 😂

  • @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714
    @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    The nazis where imperialist, not nationalist. Nationalists respect nations rights to self determination. Imperialist subjigate other nations.

    • @BritishRepublicsn
      @BritishRepublicsn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

      Nationalists respect THEIR OWN right to self determination, they generally don't care too much about other nations. Imperialism is just an extreme version of nationalism

    • @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714
      @baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@BritishRepublicsn Nationalists respect EVERY nations right to self determination within their borders.
      Imperialism is the polar opposite of nationalism. Imperialists and nationalists are arch enemies and its the most common form of right wing vs right wing war, for example right now Russijan imperialists vs Ukrainian nationalists.

    • @raressipoteanu2827
      @raressipoteanu2827 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Is bro for real

    • @bernd_das_brot6911
      @bernd_das_brot6911 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714
      They don’t tho if their nationality or national interest is being hurt by that nations internal affairs. Nationalism is just the belief that your country is the best and deserves to spread her influence, not any other bullcrap

    • @BritishRepublicsn
      @BritishRepublicsn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714 just because 2 nations are fighting, doesn't mean they're ideologically opposite. Your version of nationalists fight each other all the time

  • @ADULFGETULER
    @ADULFGETULER 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Austrian troops also marched into german cities the same way the germans did and they were greeted well