MASTERING AIKIJUJUTSU
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2024
- Interview with Master of Aikijujutsu Miguel Ibarra 10th Dan Hanshi; with his experience in Jujutsu - Aikijujutsu - Aikido - Aiki- Kempo.
DISCLAIMER: I am not claiming any rights to this or any other videos that I upload nor do I wish to profit from it/them; everything I post is for education-information purposes only.
For more info: www.yamabushiju...
filmed 34 years ago!!!!!
Sooooooo AWESOME!!! Thanks!
Excellent video i am very intrigued by Aikijutsu i wish there was a dojo near me i live in NW Indiana i'm 50 could it be difficult to learn at my age??I have studied VSK Jujitsu for a short time in my past under Shihan Lemeul Muhammad student of GM Anthony Muhammad whom both had the honor to be trained by Dr.Moses Powell
I know it's been 3 yrs but there are 2 dojo in Indianapolis that offer real Aikijujutsu. Jumonkan Dojo/Virgils Judo club and Indianapolis Martial arts center.
You do it
The Kyoto PD set up that contest, I think, between the Kodokan and the Jujutsu folks. Judo won 12/15 and tied one match... but... it should be known... that in 1886.... most of the kodokan fighters were JJ guys too!
Japanese JJ is not the same as the Brazilian bullshit. BJJ is just Jap JJ/Judo’s newaza ground techniques…that’s literally all.
This is Nina Williams style from the videogame "Tekken" series.
you also need a throwing dummy ( live and stationary) in jujutsu or any forms of wrestling. Grappling based arts really depend on interactive partner training more than striking based arts.
AikiJujitsu this style hasn't been exploited too much these days?, that is something somebody should look into?.
good move and im enteresting lern aiki
*Very* interesting, lengthy (that's good!), some bad sound, *many* martial arts terms, and could benefit from a good transcription of the interview here in replies, since there's no closed captions to help with the various terms.
There is one issue I find troubling. He says that aikijutsu was developed on the battlefield. Most of the techniques center around your arms being denied access to your sword by being grabbed either by 1 hand or 2 and either to the left arm or right. Other techniques involve you being disarmed or not pulling your sword out when met with a downward strike, horizontal strike or thrust to the abdomen region. It seems more likely that these techniques developed after the sengoku jidai period and centered around being inside daimyo headquarters where you were prohibited from wearing the katana but still having access to the wakazashi. If you were on the battlefield you were more likely to use the spear. Swords were more expensive and probably only used by higher ranking samurai. The techniques where you are unarmed and also deal with shomenuchi and yokomenuchi also seem out of place in the battlefield as you would have resorted to other weapons to deal with opponents. Again, it seems these would have been surprise attacks within restricted areas such as a daimyos palace. It's also probably myth that the daito ryu originates from the 9th century CE. I find it more likely they developed right before Sokaku's birth or were invented by Sokaku himself, notwithstanding empirical evidence such as written documents.
@@arghemm942 I'm not familiar with kanji but I suppose you are asking a question about the historical timeline?
@@arghemm942 I have no knowledge of 9th century Old Japanese but that is irrelevant. In Japan, as in China, people attach greater worth to arts and crafts who proclaim a older basis for their traditions to add more worth. It has something to do with Confucianism. A Chinese example would be how people try to say Tai Chi was invented by Zhang Feng but there is zero evidence to support this. In fact, most of the literature and/or artwork about him doesn't mention unarmed combat but rather skill with the horse and archery.
We should make conclusions based on where the evidence takes us NOT make conclusions and use evidence to support it.
@@arghemm942 That same argument can be made of anyone claiming the Daito Ryu originates from the 9th century. Where are the written documents proving that? There is none.
Well .. there are sword and other weapon wielding techniques in Aikijutsu training, but granted not involved like iaido or similar weapon specialisation training. These techniques are to help soldiers survive when they lose their sword in combat.. it can break, it can become stuck in an adversary and you need to deal with incoming attacks before you can free your weapon, or you could have been disarmed etc. Battlefields tend to be seriously hectic places and someone only trained in a specific weapon is at a huge disadvantage mid combat compared to someone able to still remain combat effective bare handed. I don't think the ethos was that you fight a battle empty handed, but more that losing a weapon doesn't mean it's game over.. you fend off attacks until you can take someone else's weapon or retrieve your own. It also of course doesn't mean soldiers didn't train specifically to be competent with weapons alongside their aikijutsu training either.
@@jimstartup2729 That's the other thing. From what I've read, Aikijutsu was known only to high ranking members of the Aizu clan who comprised an officer class. It would have not been known to regular foot soldiers. I see what you are saying about not having a weapon and using unarmed techniques as a last resort. That's why they used jujutsu although I will admit there is a blurry line between what is considered Aikijutsu and what is considered jujutsu.
Very nice I like it I learn enjoyable
how can you be aikijujutsu 10th dan hanshi at your age???
This video is at least 20 years old, if not more.
That still begs the question how can that guy be a 10th dan, back then. Even 20 years later he shouldnt be a 10th dan, In bjj it takes 45 years to become a 9th degree
AIKIJUJUTSU AND BJJ IS TWO TOTALLY DIFFERENT SYSTEMS. EVERY SYSTEM HAS THEIR OWN ADVANCEMENT TIMELINE.
Francesco G. Im sure he practice all day every day that moving up fast where some only study 2 or 3 times a day
He was not a 10th Dan when this video was made.
If you're thinking about joining aikijustsu, you should highly consider bjj instead, unless you enjoy live action role play.
Depends what you want to get out of it I guess. I wouldn't say the aikijutsu training I have done was live action role play.. it was pretty hardcore, in terms of the beatings we all took and dished out regularly, and training does also involve methods for dealing with multiple attackers armed with bladed weapons, chains, and koshes too... But to be fair most techniques are reigned in and trained softly for the safety of students hence why you may think it's role play.. it's no good losing students because they died or were incapacitated during training. You do try to look after each other while training but i still took many hard punches and kicks, that I failed to deal with along with plenty of cuts and bruises and near dislocations over the years. I also engaged in much more controlled, calm and methodical training with genuinely sharp weapons, that would look more fake to an outsider. if someone fails to block or evad such things you do have to pull it (if possible, weapons like chains are not). Allowing people to roll nicely, or breakfall out of throws, or controlling locks so you don't break arms, wrists, legs, necks etc is also to allow your fellow students to keep training, and rightly so.. it is training after all, but that doesn't mean the technique doesn't work when fully applied. Many techniques were conceived to end the altercations quick, but the training allows levels of control so people can be simply restrained or evaded. Not many people would get up again if they were dropped on their head now would they. BJJ is good for what it does, and aikijutsu also, but they are quite different on many levels. BJJ is undeniably very effective in one on one, unarmed situations. But grappling someone to submission isn't going to work if there are five other chaps able to walk up and kick you in the head or stab you while you are rolling around on the ground dealing with one guy. Sorry that went on a bit, but I just think some people don't get the lethal potential of many techniques that obviously can't be applied fully in training
Reasons not to train BJJ:
1. In a real world situation, do you really want to roll around on concrete on the ground?
2. Age. What happens once you get older, are you still able to practice it? You'll be picking up serious injuries whilst sparring.
3. There is no striking.
4. It's very much sport orientated.
BJJ= basically just Judo
you're right, except judo stops at the throw and bjj follows through to the finish in case the throw doesn't do the trick. Nothing wrong with judo except that in competition they don't let you use the good throws. So in short: judo = bjj light @@horiturk333
@@jimstartup2729 I would welcome you to apply any "deadly" techniques while you are sparring with me.
We actually have a $1000 challenge up at the moment. Anyone who is high level at any martial art other than bjj can come by the gym, if they beat one of our blue belts, you get $1000.00.
We will be waiting for you.