Watch Live: Staged Suicide Murder Trial - OH v. Matheau Moore Day 2
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ต.ค. 2024
- A man allegedly murdered his wife and made it look like a suicide. Matheau Moore, 51, stands trial in Delaware County, Ohio.
Wife Emily Noble, 52, was last seen on her birthday: May 24, 2020. She was reported missing the next day. Her body turned up in tragic and grisly fashion the following Sept. 16. She was found hanging from a tree in a wooded area near her home. There was reportedly a 20-inch USB cord around her neck. There were multiple injuries to her head and neck. Authorities determined that this was homicide.
Noble was so badly decomposed authorities had to use dental records to identify her.
Prosecutors argue Moore killed her and staged the hanging. He faces charges of murder and felonious assault.
Moore’s previous wife Lisa Pedersen told WBNS in a June 2021 report that he once choked her when she was pregnant with their first son. It was New Year’s Day 2001, she said. They had been married three months.
“He came over, and he did, for some reason, he ended up, yeah, putting his hands around my neck,” she reportedly said. “And he started to choke me.”
It was the only time he put a hand on her, and they kept in touch throughout the years, Pedersen said. Though they maintained contact, she noted that he, contrary to contemporaneous media reports, claimed to be participating in the search for Noble.
“Once the details were made clear to me, I started to lean toward his guilt,” she said.
Both of their sons are now dead, according to WBNS. One of the children reportedly died at 17 by hanging in a park the summer before Noble’s disappearance.
#StagedSuicideMurderTrial #MatheauMoore #lawandcrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on TH-camTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandC...
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.co...
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK TH-cam CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam
![⭐ฮิตในTikTok!! ( มะมะมะหมูเด้ง MooDeng ) Ver. แดนซ์ ReMix BY [ ดีเจกิต รีมิกซ์ ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4noyAoMa7bQ/mqdefault.jpg)
📌 Day Two time stamps:
0:14:43 1st witness: Sarah Johnson
0:30:40 1st witness cross examinations
0:35:09 1st witness redirect
0:36:24 2nd witness: Jessica Selfridge
0:48:20 2nd witness cross examinations
0:52:52 2nd witness answers Jury questions
0:54:06 3rd witness: Suzanne Cavanaugh (Emily's friend)
1:22:20 3rd witness cross examinations (No redirect afterwards)
1:48:48 3rd witness answers Jury questions
1:52:39 4th witness: Brandy Zink
2:14:14 4th witness cross examinations
2:20:44 4th witness answers Jury questions
2:23:18 5th witness: John Kramer
2:54:51 5th witness cross examinations
3:15:08 5th witness answers Jury questions
4:23:30 6th witness: Ltn. Justin Alloway
5:02:57 6th witness cross examinations
6:04:00 6th witness redirect
6:20:30 6th witness answers Jury questions
6:28:40 7th witness: Det. David Leighty
7:20:20 7th witness cross examinations
8:00:00 7th witness answers Jury questions
8:09:38 Legal arguments about evidence
You're a star. Thank you.
Thank you so much !
👍
Thanx!
Thank you, so much for the time stamps!
I'm impressed with the questions the jurors are asking.
They're too busy thinking up questions instead of Listening to testimony, that's more than obvious.
@@bethryan9077 lol how can they know what to ask if they don't listen to what is being said. Either they are listening or not lol. You can't have it both ways
@@Darian___ Oh, so when someone is talking to you but you're distracted thinking of something else for x seconds or how however long, you have heard everything that person said yeah? Jeez
@@bethryan9077 jeez when you're listening it's normal that a question may pop up. Ur just assuming that they aren't listening. But how can you even get a question out if you're not listening. Jeez
@@christinecartwright7636My thoughts exactly. Great Questions! I’ve served on a jury before & as soon as we deliberated, we all spat out questions we had. As instructed, during deliberations, we did send questions we had to the Judge a couple times-and each time we were basically advised to just do our job & figure it out together. Having this option to ask witnesses questions would have been very beneficial! I think Beth Ryan is just upset about the Jury’s verdict!
I can’t believe they even had probable cause to get an arrest warrant let alone get a judge to agree to proceed with a trial. Unless there’s a lot more we don’t know yet.
I agree wholeheartedly.
I can't believe day 2 of a 2 week trial and people are critical of the states case.
@@toasted_.coconut I agree, I’m kind of shocked by all the comments. I understand much is circumstantial but goodness -how wild is it that he text her that his son hung him self then avoided her calls?!! And shortly she goes “missing” found the same way, he then calls her sister “I’m sorry she’s gone” umm the same day? Gone? How do you know? Wouldn’t you say… missing at the most or worst? But “gone” is more like dead…. Then the neighbor regarding him smoking in the house was TELLING!!! Again, not enough but I’m sure that sat with the jurors. I’m sure the state is building to something more. To me this guy is sooo strange and his body language screams anger not sadness imo
@@trishah2145 yeah agreed. I’m sure there’s a lot more to come !
@@trishah2145 Tbf, "she's gone" is probably paraphrased, and even if said literally, is it really that "wrong"? Brandy Zink also used the words "she's gone missing". Isn't "gone" the right word in a context when you expect someone (or something) to be there? If someone gets a call "Hi, is X there?" and you answer "No, [I expected him/her to be here, but] he/she is gone". It feels not that weird to me. English isn't my first language, so I might be coming from a bad angle here. I agree that the guy is strange, and his body language shows more anger than sadness, but if you're accused of killing your loving wife and you're innocent, you have reasons to be angry. I'm 2 hours into day 2, and until now, there's still A LOT of reasonable doubt. So people already being "sure" he's guilty either know more than what is told in trial so far, or think they are some "body language expert", and are ignoring the fact that different people act differently in stress situations. Anyways, there sure has to be a lot more coming, I'm especially curious for his testimony...
⏰️TIME STAMPS⏰️
14:43 Sarah Johnson is the first witness. She's the manager of the dental office.
37:30 second witness is Jessica Selfridge, a bartender at Old bag of nails.
48:35 defense questions
52:55 jury questions
55:15 Suzanne Cavanugh witness, Emily's friend
1:22:40 Defense questions
Sidebar
10 minute Break
1:49:08 Jury questions
State and defense final questions
1:54:15 Brandy Zink, Emily's friend
2:14:35 defense questions
2:20:55 jury questions
2:24:50 John Kramer Witness, neighbor
2:55:00 Defense questions
3:04:05 return from Sidebar
3:15:20 Jury questions
4:24:10 Lieutenant Alloway
5:03:40 defense questions
5:46:00 leads to break
6:04:40 Returns from break State questions again
6:11:50 defense questions again
6:20:32 jury questions
6:29:15 Detective Leighty
7:20:20 defense questions
8:00:00 jury questions
Absolutely awesome 👌🏽👏🏽💜
@@KimMarshall44 🙏🏼💞🙏🏼 thanks! I just enjoy helping where I can! 🔮⚖️🔮
Thank you for the extra details!
Someone already did this 6 days before you did but it was nice
@@novascotiaskater1868 yep but those were wrong so I did it with the correct info. 🤷🏽♀️
Attorneys should pay attention to the questions asked, the jurors minds work differently that the legal minds - great questions. I like this judge!
I keep listening thinking at some point there has to be smoking gun proof he killed his wife but I haven’t heard anything conclusive so far to make me think he’s definitely guilty. I guess we will have to wait to see if prosecution can put up more damning evidence.
At this point, it's just a big shrug for me 🤷♀️ It could be that he did it. But there's a mountain of reasonable doubt so far. And the defence hasn't even started their case yet.
No doubts yet for me. Not guilty atp. The state haven't put a single piece of evidence good for them.
Plenty they introduced is good for the defence.. they have no case.
Thankfully jury seems to have gotten it right..
Anyone know how long is this trial expected to last? Getting really impatient with the state after 2 days of testimony that has done practically nothing to move the needle in terms of their burden of proof…
I think they said 2 weeks.
@@laila6093 thanks!
He’s got incredible legal representation- this male prosecutor isn’t on her level.
You are impatient. They just started.
@@YourPsychDoc he certainly does! I watched Diane Menashe during the Dr. Husel trial and was very impressed by her.
Wow! What an astute jury panel often asking better questions than any of the attorneys. Even some I, myself, was wondering why none of the attorneys asked.
Can’t believe not one person has a ring camera or any kind of camera system that would catch her on any kind of video
I've been saying this from the start.....it's unbelievable nobody in their neighborhood has a camera. Every single house on my street has a camera 👌
It's a retirement community. Not fast to incorporate tech. 🤔😔🤷♀️
Good! Ring cameras are a privacy nightmare and the company violates users civil rights by giving footage to the police without warrants.
@@cl4998 Ring cameras are great for evidence.
True!!!!!
It’s crazy how different a beard can make you look. I feel like the pictures we’re seeing of the defendant and the live version of the defendant are two different people.
@@skrem23 to throw the jury off?
@@skrem23 Watch the arrest video. He had already trimmed his beard.
@@GreezmunkyTV his beard as trimmed but he wasn’t clean-shaven as he is in court. The beard does alter his appearance.
Agreed. It's like seeing a person who you havent seen in a while who was always obese after they have lost a substantial amount of weight. They look like a completely different person.
@@skrem23 relax, everyone is just making observations. No one is questioning why it was done.
Is it a law that defense lawyers have to always sound like condescending arses?
She’s exactly the kind of defense attorney someone would want!
@@robmullin1128 agreed! She’s killing it! No pun intended
She is a condescending arse.
@@robmullin1128 she is really good.
Yes. Yes, indeed, there is such a law
Day 2;and still not one shred of evidence against the defendant.....still wondering how this made it inside of a courtroom
Exactly 💯
Agreed 👍 it seems strange. I am getting trolled for saying the same as you. Maybe its my name 🤔 😂
exactly DITTO !
@@anne-mariemoore where were you on May 24, 2020 !!!! ha
@@daniellovett4687 ha 🤣 in my home in Scotland recovering from brain surgery actually 🤣
Is the jury being allowed to
Ask questions of the witnesses?
You don't see this very often
I think this is an excellent idea
Sabrina, I think so, as is the family. Also, I think it was mentioned in opening statements, this is a two week trial..
I really like the idea! Definitely would help to clear things up and make sure they have all the info before they make such a big decision!
Some states allow it. Other states don't. It would be great if it was allowed by all states.
It’s a great indication of how many holes the state has got in its case…they are listening and the effect it’s having on the demeanour of the prosecution is palpable, even watching from Canada ✌️❤️🌎
YES! Some states do allow this! Some judges won't, some do. I think it's a great concept and jurors certainly pay MORE attention to the process.
I wonder if the tension between Matt and Suzanne was due to jealousy on Suzanne’s part - thinking she would move back from California and resume her ‘Lucy and Ethel’ relationship with Emily but now had to compete with Matt and Joey.
The prosecutor is no match for this defense attorney. We are in day 2 and she has done her homework with casting doubt to each of the State’s witnesses. The witnesses seem like lovely people who truly loved Emily but unfortunately their distaste for the defendant is not proof he committed the crime. If the State is going to try to win this case on circumstantial evidence they need to get witnesses that can show opportunity and motive. So far that has not yet been shown as his attorney is tearing apart their stories casting reasonable doubt. Should be interesting when we get to the experts like the Medical Examiner that can hopefully provide actual evidence and not conjecture and speculation.
totally agree!
Yup! We need MORE defense attorney’s like her in this country!!!!! 💪
Yea just wait for the MA! There are injuries on her face! Cracked bones and bruising
@@BlargBlather oops I meant ME…medical examiner
@@stevetrivago thank you for the kind words but I am not an attorney. Would love to go to law school just to learn more!
I'm learning that unless you can afford your own attorney, you should not commit a crime. Another class discrimination, if you can afford to be evil, you can.
Where did that come from? The State cannot prove its case.
@@marciemoore3245do you honestly think a public defender would put in this effort? Surely they might want to. Yet they're overworked and under resourced. Imo there's no way you get this level of a defence by the state. The same state trying to convict, for the record...
There’s no faster way to push someone away than to talk bad about her partner unsolicited 💯 The ex friend offered nothing to the prosecution.
So true.
Seems that is all she wanted to talk about with Emily. She wanted him out of the picture.
@@audreymai2773 I agree, think she is very bitter, and maybe was resentful of Matt being in the picture!
She offered up his controlling behavior and his drinking.
IMO defendant is very very fortunate to have such a great, intelligent, diligent, thorough, lawyer. ⚖️🧐🤔🤨😳😮🙏🕊️ RIP
He’s guilty, and she’s pulling at straws showing those pictures.
@@florenceglenn4627 well the jury disagreed and so do I. There’s no evidence to say he was even close to killing her.
Agreed! She’s a fantastic attorney! The defense’s opening was lame
@@metchacMaybe she’s good, so how come I don’t particularly like her? She’s irritating.
@@marciemoore3245jealousy?
whats up with the eye roll as jury was being seated?
His attorney is sharp as a tack! Brilliant!
When is the prosecution going to start putting some evidence on the table?
There has been a lot of evidence. Circumstantial evidence counts the same as physical evidence and every day there has been more.
@@raoul3719 I've always said circumstantial evidence is my favorite evidence. So far we have none of that.
Day 2 of a 2 week trial. Do you know how trials work?
@@Leaveit_alone I sure do, but I'm not sure you do, since it's Day 3. The jury selection day is always counted in the estimate given to the jurors for the number of days they should plan around. Additionally, it is rare that a trial takes as long as estimated. It happens, but it's rare. Glad I could help you out.
@@IzzyMariel hahaha
Beginning to wonder about the son now .....
Should have been investigated.
Am confused about the hounddogs following her scent to the house towards northwest on two separate occasions. Has anything been said about who lived there and if they were known to Emily?
At 6:21:05 two juror questions ask this information. Apparently it is a driveway shared between two houses and neither one had contact with Emily during the time period.
The jurors questions are on point and they show how...let's say unprepared the police was. "I don't know" "i don't recall" "i can't answer that". The questions were specifically asked for their duty. Like....what did you do then??????
The defense attorney is very abrasive with the witnesses.
I agree.
shes very good - direct, no messing
@@syritasdoneitgoodytwoshoes2471 I’m not sure I like how she tried to be super friendly with John.
@@syritasdoneitgoodytwoshoes2471 I can assure you that being abrasive won't be viewed in good light by the jury.
She was sarcastic with across street neighbor, ... "And your memory is so good...."
The detective has just blown this whole case. The Blood hounds finding nothing at the home shoots the whole case down. Surely the State must have more than this.
If I get arrested in Ohio , I want this defense attorney. She is sharp.
Yes, if you kill someone, she will get you off.
Hope you have an inheritance to pay her because Matt had to use his to pay for her.
After jury left for day last 10 minutes of this video very important if you are following this case watch it!
100%
You can't put a man in prison for your feelings or what you think of his peculiar behavior. The prosecutor hasn't shown one piece of evidence against this man, especially how he managed to get her through the woods and up a tree with no scratches, not even on his hands! It's impossible- the brush was so dense no one smelled or saw anything for a year, but he carried her in with no problems.
FYI; An officer testified Abt the crime scene & the limb the cord was tied to was less than 6 ft off the ground (& she was found slouch kneeling....?)
However I take your point- I'm not able to decide until I hear the medical/ scientific evidence in any murder case. Like here, in opening the state said she had fractures on face, Defense says their expert says absolutely no face fractures... so we atleast have to see that far into trial!
IMO Its a crime against humanity to convict/imprison an innocent (& grieving!!) person- :)
Windi. Born…..wasn’t she found in September of that year? Four months after Emily went missing? Am I wrong?🇦🇺
You need to watch the cop-cam footage deary, it clearly shows how he manipulated the scene in the garage in regards to - moving the esky with the cord on top & he let out more cord & he added a flashlight on the bench. He had the Audacity to call the cop into the garage & show him that cord as if the cop is a daft as people like yourself. He did this After the neighbour across the road had said he'd seen Emily in the garage that morning because he Thought he was cleared by that time, being daylight. Unfortunately for this wife murderer, John recanted what he said later that evening because he had recalled what he did that morning & day & said he knew he saw her that evening because he spoke to her. If you can't work out how he could get a person in that area without getting scratched, I suggest you stick to the one hour TV shows that tell ya the ending. Obviously you're not Listening to what he says about her phone either & how many times he has changed many aspects of his Story. BTW - the body was Not up a tree & it was September when found. Jeez.
@@catherinepalun972 Yes, it was 4 months.
Emily was found closer to the parking lot. Maybe, there was a way into the woods from that direction? Also, this is the woods Emily frequented? She got in & out. Mat could have too undetected especially since this is a senior community. Mat would have worn gloves (no scratches) & outdoor garments. Was questioning why kids didn't find her when playing in the woods. Senior Community = no kids. In reference to the smell, it should have been detected within 24 hours. Especially, within 4 months even along the perimeter of the woods along County Line Road & the bike path. Why would no one smell anything in the hot summer heat? I'm not convinced she was placed there immediately. Science will hopefully tell us. Proof & facts are needed.
True justice will always be.. we will all stand before God one day… it may not come on earth but it will come..for all the guilty who walk free and for all those innocent wrongfully convicted on this earth..
Ahhh what’s the evidence? A neighbor and two friends who didn’t like the defendant??!!
Maybe there’s a good reason not to like him. The neighbor knew she wasn’t coming back. She didn’t allow smoking in the apartment and when she was “missing” Matt was smoking. All the details are leading up to guilt.
@@Lololeeleehow did the neighbor “know” she wasn’t coming back? Is that factual?
@@Brandi_the_Baker Because she didn’t allow smoking in the apartment. Do you believe he was guilty?
This just shows that when your loved one is missing- search for them yourself. Shame on them that they didn’t go in the woods, they let a dog determine if they should and the police who ‘looked’ just checked the outer perimeter of the bike area. Have any of you been down a bike trail with woods? It can be thick. How could they not look to see if she was hurt, injured or dead along those woods thoroughly? Still no physical evidence this guy did ANYTHING. Just a tree branch and her weight held, she was there for a year, no neighbors or children playing found, smelled or saw anything. This is a terrible waste or resources and this innocent (so far) man’s life. He also lost his son and wife so imagine his grief.
The married man asked the old neighbor man to buy cigarettes and JB. He was not concerned!
His father died while he is in jail also
I believe she was found four months after her demise!🇦🇺
He doesn’t even shed a tear when they show her body hanging from a tree! I think he used her and then killed her.
@@aemlife7516 Wow, let's hope someone like you never gets a seat in the jury. Alcohol/drugs is the first thing a lot of people grab onto to forget/handle their problems, especially someone with a history of addiction to any of those substances. I'm not calling guilty or not guilty for now, like any reasonable/honest person would/should.
So do I understand this right? Emily and her husband go out to celebrate her birthday, come home and go to bed, she gets up in the morning and makes the bed, goes out for a walk but instead of taking her phone she takes a phone cord, hangs herself from a 6ft tree, same way her stepson did, and she hung there for 4 months even after many searchers and dogs had searched in that area??
This is his version.
That's what the evidence or lack of evidence says so far
This is what the physical evidence suggests so far.
I don't think that neighbor saw her in the morning and she hung herself the night before when she was drunk and popping Klonopin
A 20” usb cord. I don’t think so
Why is there so much obesity in law enforcement? How are they able to physically do what's required of officers?!! Disgusting.
I really hope Matt take’s the stand. I would like to hear what he has to say! It’s so hard to believe his wife would kill herself just like his son did 10 months before! I admit so far I would not be able to convict. We’ll see. Very interesting case. And very sad!!
I can see it easily. Some family's are crazy close and some shut down some kill themself after a family member dies.
I can't think of anything worst for me literally.
It's awful but I don't know what the rhetoric has been on this case over there in the last 2 years, from the comments I am seeing it seems, most have already decided he's guilty. Can't see why, other than, they just don't like him. So in this case, I expect his lawyer will have advised strongly against it.
Personally speaking as a mental health professional no one knows why someone ends there life the way they did. That's why i feel I'm edging to not guilty on reasonable doubt
Sadly, lots of people do it the same way as others. My MIL did it the same way one of her friends did it 2 days before. It was a strange thing to use too.
@@Jesusistheonlyway549 sorry to hear that I agree unless the forensic evidence is 100% I can't see him being found guilty
His attorney is far superior..
What type of person asks for donations to buy a new car?
I's not strange for a newly married couple to stick closely together.
Not a good a idea to put down your friend's husband. This woman didn't know Matt. She kept bringing him up - no wonder it was the end of that friendship. I think she was jealous of Matt and made assumptions.
So far the prosecution has nothing. The dental receptionist and the bartender proved nothing.
A patient for barely a year at an office of 4700 patients yet you "recognized her"?
"Did you keep in touch?"
"No."
"We simply kept in touch in 30 different ways on frequent occasions."
My main question right now would be to ask for clarification on the loss of the other son, the circs of the 17yr old, and if there are any mirrors aside from the obvious between Joey and Emily's demise.
The prosecution here is dire. Unless! He is VERY slowly creating a beautiful net. At present the defendant is winning without saying a word.
Odd that it happened the one night Emily was gone and Matheau was alone with Joey.
omg, 2 days only & you're slamming the prosecution as if the state has lost. Jeez. Go back & watch the cop-cam footage again & see if you can find out when that wife murderer Changes the scene in the garage.
@@bethryan9077 slamming the prosecution is a bit different to deciding if someone is guilty or innocent, don't you think?
@@fabulouslyfeline8238 It was You who said the prosecution was dire & that at present the defendant is winning without saying a word. Ludicrous indeed. Obviously you don't comprehend Other people's replies.
@@bethryan9077 I am just as entitled as you to give my opinion. Just because you have decided he's guilty...not my problem if you can't deal with other people having a different perspective.
In my opinion, the prosecution is dry. And like I said in my first comment, unless he is weaving a beautiful net for them to fall into, at present, HE (not the evidence) is losing the case when compared to the defence.
Have a stab at that. I'm sure you'll find a way to insert your own righteous opinion there somewhere.
This is one of the best defense lawyers I've watched since the lawyers that got the cop that shot a guy over throwing popcorn at him
How?
Curtis Reeves.
She is! There have been a lot of terrible ones streamed lately. I’m wondering how she is getting paid?
She defended Dr Husel too
Her oddly raised voice is so unnecessary tho 🙉
Anybody get a creepy feeling when Matheau wanted to take the neighbor out shooting?
Could have been three.
Yes!
That was hear say testimony. That witness never heard him say that. It was told to him( allegedly) by his 90+ year old father ( who is no longer alive ) . Also,that witness said he went 'people watching' 4 days a week. I'm pretty sure he did remember seeing Emily that morning,because he's a watcher. He called the detective every time he saw a new face or vehicle across the street. It's still innocent until proven guilty, folks.
@@GreezmunkyTV He told the cop not long after on the Same evening, that he made a mistake about seeing Emily that morning & it could have been days before. He said he knew he saw her the evening before when he came home from his sister's Memorial Day party as he spoke to Emily as she was leaving to go for a walk. He came across as a very credible witness & it was obvious he wasn't trying to lie or exaggerate.
Is the prosecution really trying to say that she couldn't have possibly killed herself because if she did she would have canceled her scheduled dentist appointment the following day??
😂yup! Ridiculous!
No, the fact that she made the appointment. There’s other clues the jury slept through.
After 2 days we know the following: she was not killed in the home or transported in their vehicles. She was seen by the neighbor at 9-10 am in the morning despite the neighbor's clearly biased testimony that he wasn't sure. So where does that leave the prosecution?
Being objective as I can and I’m usually pro prosecution but I think it’s very very safe to say that as of after day 2 not a single juror would vote guilty on what has been presented so far.
@@dennissinkovics8379 and testimony is still being presented BEYOND DAY 2.
John told the cop not long after that he made a mistake about the day he saw Emily. This my dear, happens all the time.
How do we know she was not killed in the home? If she was strangled there would be no evidence.
@@staceyb.5878 I didn't pay much attention, but did they use the cadaver dogs inside the house? Theoretically they should've sense the smell of a cadaver. I think in the case of Madeleine McCann the cadaver dogs reacted to a place next to the bed and around the car. It seems to me it doesn't need to be a decomposing body to identify the smell. So, even if she was strangled, and there wasn't any blood, the dogs would still react to traces of cells from the corpse left in the house, in the car used for transportation, on the brenches of the bushes or trees she touched with her body parts, while being carried in the woods. That's what the defense attorney asks and the policeman agrees with her.
How the shoes were tied was my FAVORITE Columbo episode. It had Robert Conrad. It was genius writing and I’ll always remember it. It’s very true. Someone else would indeed tie someone’s shoes a different direction, than if you were tying your own.
amen!
Colombo was effin great. Loved it. Best cop on tv in uk at time.
Ah yeah, just more question
Not defending or accusing but being a leftie what about the laces being tied by a left handed person?
😂my favourite episode!
These are the WORST witnesses ever.
People in the chat are talking about Matheau Moore killing her and putting her in a freezer for a while before taking her out and hanging her. There would be loads of forensic evidence both in the freezer and in the body if that had been the case. IMO.
There would 100% be evidence on her body if she was frozen before disposal.
Oh Suzanne Cavanaugh....I understand you're upset about your friend's death but your testimony comes off as you having some sort of grudge against Matt for no apparent reason.
I can't get over the difference in the defendant's appearance between the pix shown and him in person. He looks like he lost a lot of weight. I've never heard of this case, and have zero bias toward either side. I have had suicides in my family. It is always devastating and impossible to comprehend. That's why I started watching. Wanting to blame someone else for the death is so easy to understand. If he actually killed his wife and staged it, he's a particular kind of monster.
True I’ve been thinking to myself wow he looks like two totally different people
I bet he’d be able to stay on the run in a foreign country for a very long
Time or on the run anywhere
Advanced alcoholism will do that to you....
He cleaned up for court.
By leaving absolutely no evidence whatsoever he would be the smartest of those particular kind of monsters. The poor guy is innocent.
@@straightforwardprison cleaned him up and maybe sobered him up.
There was clothing by her bed on the floor, unusual for someone who is tidy and another inconsistency who apparently made her bed but not straightened her pillow.
I would not convict a man of murder because his suicidal wife didn’t straighten her pillows or pick up her clothes on the day she decided to kill herself.
Not for someone that went bar hopping the night before.
@@catherinejudd7993 Evidence that she was suicidal?
Can´t wait to hear him declare !
So far as of day 2 I have not heard any evidence saying he is guilty. Come on prosecutor. Feelings are not enough for proof. The only thing I see so far is PD botched the search.
This prosecutor has got to step it up. I don't know the story (which I am glad about) and I can tell you this prosecutor sounds like he has no confidence. I hope they can prove this beyond a shadow of reasonable doubt.
You think he's guilty? Why?
I def have doubt he's guilty which means the prosecution isn't doing their job. I'm just saying the prosecution better have something better than what they've got so far. If I was on this jury I'd already start having doubts.
@@candiceking1833 your message seems to apply he’s guilty & you’d like prosecution to prove that beyond reasonable doubt?
because if he’s innocent I hope defence can prove reasonable doubt..
No. So far according to the evidence I feel he's not guilty. Either he's not guilty or the prosecutor and law enforcement dropped the ball. Either way I think he'll be going free. Great if he's innocent, terrible if he's guilty.
You've watched 2 days of a 2 week trial & have stated below that you think he's not guilty. You clearly have Missed a whole lot for a start, like his changing the scene in the garage.
34:50 when you say something you expect to be objected to and withdraw it just to make sure the jury can't un-hear it.
Every time the prosecution try to build some context the defence objects and the judge agrees each time ….bit frustrating
That's the law, part of the constitution. Inaliable Rights and all
The prosecutor’s questions are very poorly posed and often not In proper form. Trial Attorney 101.
Because the prosecution sucks and has no case.
I did feel the judge was slightly biased towards the Defense….but not much. Barely noticeable….he’s a great Judge.
A second day that proves these prosecutors remove pieces of evidence to what, convict an innocent man?
WTH?!
He used the same term for his son's death and his wife's disappearance. "gone"
But I think they didn't show the message. Are we sure he used this word, and is not an word used by the witness? People's memory can be tricky.
the exit sign is lit
😂😂😂
OMG this defense attorney is a peach. The only thing she has is bring to the table is being loud, obnoxious & asking questions just for the sake of asking questions. I can’t listen to her anymore so I fast forward.
She defended Dr Husel too
Last time I checked everyone can have an opinion. Y’all getting so upset over a comment made by someone you don’t know, says more about you. She wasn’t the main attorney in Dr Husel trial, so don’t make it sound like she single handily saved the day. I believe Jose Biaz had a lot to do with it.
@@BlargBlather She's a friggin waste of space who loves herself way too much
Well... she was the best person for the job, because he is not guilty on all counts.
Lead defense council is SO aggressive and offputting. I do not get her strategy. She always comes off as hostile. ☹
Why did he ask the neighbor to get him smokes and Jack Daniel's? Just too impaired or needed to get rid of something?
He probably didn't want to be seen buying JD instead of helping search for his missing wife. 🤷🏼♀️
maybe he had already been drinking and didn't want to drive drunk? some people have the ability to make every move seem suspicious when it isn't. stop being a hammer making everything a nail lol
Maybe he wanted to be home in case the wife returned, she left her keys at home.
Leave the door unlocked then
Is it just me or did the prosecutor have absolutely nothing?
You are so right
They need to build and finish with the most important/best evidence so it's fresh in jurors minds.
It’s a two week trail
@@3939LA there is just something about his attitude that seems like he has no clue what to do. To be honest there doesnt seem to be any smoking gun
@@ManAcadie I would rather have a prosecutor soft spoken and sincere than a bully lawyer any day!
The medical examiner better bring some compelling evidence because so far the state has presented nothing connecting Matt to wife's death.
When the obligatory Motion to Dismiss is presented, this is the first time I think the case may actually get dismissed.
I could not convict him on what the state has presented so far. 🤷🏼♀️
omg, you've watched 2 days of a 2 Week trial & think you know it all. LOL.
@@bethryan9077 your rude ,a Bully.Everyone has a right to their openion and I think Snowcat Tish is SO correct……
@Interrogation Files wtf?
I agree
@@bethryan9077 I mean they did give their opening statement. Not saying you should only go off that, but I think it shows that at the very least the prosecution has a poor way of presenting their arguments. Compare this prosecution opening statement to the once of Chandler Halderson's case. If you have the burden of proof it helps to be clear from the start on how much proof you have
This attorney talking so bad towards the office mngr of the dentist office is a JERK!! I had to crack up..Attorney said “so your an office mngr not law enforcement right”? Like SERIOUSLY!! This Attorney is a real winner! Lol (JOKE)
Are you gonna be ok?
She is a jerk.
Who sends a text that your step son is dead? You’d think he would have reached out to a friend or LE in town to let her know. 💔
If we can’t imagine losing a child, we can’t know what someone would do.
@@anitalauer2715 Thank you
I KNOW when my son died at the age of 31 that I literally could not speak…. Hated the phone. There’s no way to know how a grieving person reacts or why.
A guy like Matt would text that, and then not communicate with her immediately after the text. So why wouldn’t he answer her?
Yes and he said to her as he told Amy about Enemy her sister is gone not is missing.
Regarding the photographic evidence collected in Emily's home : At 7:15:51 . . . the 'State' offered page 2 of some handwritten notes that need explanation - 1) "get Emily a new phone" . . . WHY? 2) "burn documents" . . . WHAT DOCUMENTS & WHY? 3) "made progress on Mom's estate (mailed letters)" . . . WHO'S MOM ? & 4) "deposit checks" . . . WHOSE CHECKS ? I noticed that when the prosecution re-read these notes she left out the "burn documents", but the "get Emily a new phone", considering this search was a mere 2 days after Emily was reported 'missing' is equally important. OTHER CONCERNS are State exhibit # 29 (the guest bathroom at 7:07:14 & the master bathroom at 7:10:07) - Did they check for razors, toothbrushes & DNA samples ? NEXT: A photo of the closet in the master bedroom at 7:09:55 . . . It appears that there are only female clothing showing. Since we saw that the guest closet was completely empty, I think some indication of Mr. Moore's actually living in the home would be appropriate. States exhibit # 34 -The State also showed a photo of shelves in the living room at 7:08:57 - I can't remember seeing the Gun, magazine & Flashlight on that table when the responding officer was first interviewing Mr. Moore (day 1) & Mr. Moore went to get Emily's purse (looking for Emily's keys). I could be mistaken, I will back track and check that out. As for the Defense exhibit photos. I cannot understand why she wasn't given copies of ALL the photos taken, long before this went to trial. I understand that the prosecution only has to offer up those items that they intend to use, but seriously. Wouldn't She be entitled to review ALL evidence acquired ? So, understandably she was unprepared. DEFENSE exhibit 'H' - at 7:28:14, She was quick to question whether 'soil samples' had been taken from the shoes in the garage. DEFENSE exhibit 'J-3' - at 7:40:38, a) the toolbox should have been opened & it's contents inspected, PROPERLY ? b) Samples of the debris on the seat should have been examined & tested. c) Were the 'spare' license plates investigated ? And Finally, DEFENSE exhibit 'J-4' - at 7:41:28, Is that a 'Rope' lying across the console ? I doubt that the answers to these last 3 entries will benefit the defense's case, but they should have been presented to her before the trial.
I checked back to when Sgt. Hollis first entered Emily Noble's house. At 5:11:00 Moore puts Emily Noble's purse onto the shelves just to the left of the fireplace.. The flashlight is clearly visible, but not the gun & magazine.
I can't believe in a nice neighborhood like that no one had a ring or security camera!
What a cluster as far as the extraction goes on the phones.. they dont remember what they found, didn't follow thru with locations, messages... Nothing! Ridiculous 😂
The nosey neighbor got destroyed on cross and the prosecution didn't even re-direct. And apparently the police didn't grid-search the area, but instead relied on dogs or walking along the path and hoping to see something. Not looking good for the state.
Many cases that are streamed on this channel are slam dunks, think back to Chandler Halderson and Joel Guy Jr. This case is intriguing. I'm surprised police were so lazy/sloppy in their search for a murder victim.
No he didn't lol
Disagree
I loved the old guy! However his memory isn't serving him well. Matt smoking in the condo right after emily went missing is disturbing to me.
I wouldn’t describe it as destroyed….she was fake friendly and he answered the questions and there was no being destroyed….the police didn’t rely on dogs , they had a miscommunication and thought they had searched the area.
Still don't understand how the two friends testimony somehow proves that he killed his wife
Such a complex case. I was so completely on one side and now I do have questions. But in the end… I do believe he did some thing… Because I don’t think she would have ever killed herself without a note of some sort and making everything very understandable and clean and tidy… Godspeed Emily😇
My Aunty hung herself in the closet while everyone was outside celebrating a national holiday.. sometimes it makes no sense..
My uncle hung himself after having dinner with his family.... No notes what so ever
my 27 year old cousin, who NO ONE KNEW was struggling at all....went out, the day before father's day, bought his dad a card(which would not have been delivered in time, but would arrive a few days later), wrote in it that he was looking forward to attending a Cardinal baseball game the next week with his dad....put that card in the mail....and that night, after an amazing night out with friends....went home to his apt, and...a little after midnight....on Father's Day....blew his brains out. No note.
His dad rec'd his card a few days later.
That note in the card confused EVERYONE. Why would he buy a card? Why would he take the time to write in it that he was looking forward to attending a baseball game the next week??
Why would be take the time to put it in the mail????
The truth is...the thoughts at the literal moment someone takes their life....can never be understood by those of us still on this side of the dirt.
Sometimes it is a split second decision...
I too, in the beggining was thinking there's a good chance he's innocent but after some of the witnesses,, I think there's a possibility he killed both his son and wife. ...but not sure there's going to be enough evidence to prove it. Yet too early to to tell I guess.
Suicides typically don't make sense. I know a guy that done it out back during a family BBQ. He had also just purchased a new boat and made plans to go out fishing w his brother. No note
I only watch the cross examinations and jury questions👍🏽 on this trial.
@4:30:40 I'm sorry, WHAT?! Are they trying to say that a person that was going to end their life would have taken their house keys and phone with them to do it?? Especially when the location they were ultimately found was within walking distance??
Since she always had her phone ~ I think he would have placed her phone with her if he was staging something. I also don't believe she would have been hung the way she was found if it was staged.
Lady at 1 hour and 20 minutes is crazy!
Ms Defense Attorney - you are a shark that knows her case! Thank you!!!!!
She is terrible
She sounds like a loud nasty witch. Her voice is biting with anger. If I was siting on this jury, I would be totally annoyed with with her. It’s like she is trying to convince the witness of what he is seeing.
@@robinbond7878 I disagree - prosecutors are usually the aggressors - it’s refreshing to see a defense attorney fight for their client imho 😊
@@BlessedFloridaMom you can fight without sounding nasty. She needs to watch the Johnny Depp trial. She needs some pointers. The things that she was pointing out were totally irrelevant. Like see he has cords in his house and they weren’t touched. And.. he probably has more than one.. what’s the point. I kept looking fir the point that she was trying to convince the detective of. She was all over the place. Like Elaine. And LOUD! If I thought that she was loud and rambling, I am sure thar some of the jurors did too.
the search dogs not finding anything in the home/cars is pretty huge. However the couple did like to go out and walk and stuff, so it coulda be done outside
Suzanne Cavanaugh seems off. We weren't close friends until she gave me $$, then we were like Thelma and Louise, yet I didn't know she lived with man she married.... and they weren't touchy feely, yet he held on to her too close... and oh yeah he was too drunk to drive but I got in the back seat.🤷♀️🤷♀️🤷♀️
I can’t stand people who use others she wasn’t friends with her for years then the money changes things greed is ugly we became best friends but she didn’t know Matt sounds to me like Emily kept her private life to herself or these people were not her real close friends
It sounds like they weren’t actually good friends.
Why did he extract information on the three women's phones all the way back to June?
I love this defense attorney soooooo much!!!!
I’m not seeing it.
Matt seems to be getting more nervous!
Hey defense attorney!! Did you ever think that she was not killed at home? Many murders are not at home.
She was killed outside home
Did Detective Lt seriously say missing kids are not that urgent because they could be run aways who don’t want to be found?
I didn't know Diane Menashe was on this case--she's really good--
y did you strike "shes really good". because ... she is very good
I didn't strike that-- I have no idea why it got lined through.
I made the mistake of looking at the comments and spoiled the ending. Now I have to find another one to watch.
Didn't this defense attorney just work with Jose baez dr husel trial?
Yes
She’s good!
@@Beetlebug781 yes as soon as I realized who she was I decided I have to watch this trial! I loved her in the husel trial
@@justbrandy8520 She was excellent in the Husel trial, unlike the judge who seemed to treat the occasion as a joke.
Aah! That's where I know her from. Thanks!
Love the arched windows in their house.x
What's the State's motivation/agenda for prosecuting...
They believe Matheau Moore killed Emily?
Who actually found the remains ? I missed that
Someone passing by I believe
I hope the ex wife testify. Sounds like Matt had a alcohol problem.
Prosecution won't call her because she's been arrested for DV.
On one hand alcohol can make you violent especially if you’re suffering emotionally/mentally inside…. But on the other hand alcohol is understandable when you have spent a lot of your life grieving over loved ones to numb the pain..
Law enforcement doing several searches and found nothing as usual, if you want these cops to find anything you would need to put it in a box of donuts
Still waiting for some ACTUAL evidence in this case. I'm still stunned that the county is actually prosecuting this case. Oh, and no, people.... "he just looks guilty to me" is not a reason to take a case to trial. Thank God some of y'all watching this case aren't serving on the jury.
You’d think differently if you were Emily Noble’s family. There’s much more evidence to come.
Thank God YOU are not a witness in the jury: it is amazing how gullible some people can be! Joey and Emily were found dead in the same fashion: hanging from a tree. Two people around Matt who were perfectly alright are found dead in the same way... and it is just a coincidence?
Agree!!! Can’t believe the prosecutor is doing this
I hope witness 2 doesn’t go into labor on the stand
Flashback to.. many years ago now myself & another woman (who I swear was same shape as the witness here) were standing at a bus stop. While waiting on the bus we began general chit chat, ie the weather, buses not being on time etc leading up to my asking when her baby was due her reply being "I'm not pregnant".! 😲
Cringe.! 😬
Awful moment for me, embarrassing or what, I mean .. impossible to un ask what id asked.!🤔
Luckily she took it well, just laughed saying she got asked that a lot. Phew... Still felt awful.😂
46:00 Always tip generously or at least not stingily because you never know when it will appear in evidence as you’re on trial for murder.
I was looking for this comment. Noticed that the defense brought up the tip amount out of nowhere… maybe trying to get brownie points in Matt’s favor.
that lawyer for the husband pretty much treats and accuses everyone else of lying even to the point of trying to say the prosecution is hiding evidence from them, which they make her look like a little witch!
Dammit! Attorney needs to coach him on his facial expressions. Lord a'mercy!
I agree especially the smirks. He comes off as cocky.
100%
Agree! So smirky!
I believe his facial expression is being uncomfortable. The pain and grief in this mans eyes are apparent. He does seem to be somewhat amused when his attorney tries her Perry Mason last word quips! Heck she’s on point💯. To see a great attorney practice with the knowledge and determination and while being straightforward and not confusing is good stuff. After watching trials for years I find it interesting that the recent Not Guilty defendants are the ones that seem very interested in the trial and not the ones that endlessly scribble on legal pads.
@@gmaheybaby1283 I completely disagree. I think he looks very irritated /put out to be there, I see zero pain, just a I’m too good for this trial. The guy is 100% a narcissist. He leeched off her, treated her like crap, drank his face off, did nothing of substance and didn’t support her emotionally.
Do the extractions include iPads?
I feel like the prosecution is trying to scrape for evidence against the defendant..first of all you have 2 friends that were jealous of Emily being married because she is not the single friend anymore..one friend was more long distant..the one that "said she seen bruises..then u have a neighbor that heard ONE fight..and a office manager that says she had an appt coming up..I feel not guilty ..Emily dealt with alot of death..and she just gave up..mental illness doesn't have time is of the essence when someone wants to end their life..sad...
It's early days for the prosecution, but I'm inclined to agree with your appraisal.
Over the last 2 months I've been struggling really bad with mental illness. A few times I've been so low and wanted to call it quits. From my experience the mental torture was unbearable, the last thing on my mind was upcoming appointments, I was using all my energy to try and get through the next 5 minutes. I know we are all different, but if she was in the middle of a mental crisis a dental appointment would be the last thing on her mind. I hope she has found peace and is with her loved ones.
@@purples7455 just wanted to say many big hugs to you 🤗🤗🤗...brighter days are ahead🙏🙌
I don't understand where the defense was going with her questioning regarding the dental appointment, I guess that she just wanted to look professional 🤔
Just beginning to listen to the defense cross. The female attorney is so condescending and snarky IMHO. She isn't helping her client.
I’m waiting for the point of looking at all these pictures of the inside of the house when there is no evidence of a crime inside the house.