The flood in the Bible? That would be the one that the people in Europe,Asia, Africa, Australia,and North & South America didn't notice. Are you aware that there are earlier stories about global floods that predate the old testament story and make no mention of Noah?
@@cnault3244 of course. But the only reliable story is in the Bible. The Bible has been shown to be credible in all historical/archeological assertions.
This specific example of these sedimentary layers being laid down simultaneously with massive earthquakes is explained in detail by Walt Brown in his free online book at www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ where he submits a viable alternative to the theory of Plate Tectonics. He calls this particular phenomenon 'liquefaction' instead of 'seismites'. Actually, I guess it would be more accurate to say that seismites are a small, specific area that falls under liquefaction. I highly recommend this book. His theory is based in physics and mathematics, due to his mechanical engineering degree from MIT. After reading it, you will wonder how we have allowed Plate Tectonics has continued to be taught with all the major problems with it! Enjoy!
Absolutely, for the earth to be off it's axis and african animal fossils found in ash falls Nebraska, I believe something happened even before the flood.
Bill Burkhalter if I’m not educated in the field of geology and geography but I wanted to learn about it I would choose to be educated by a non-religious academic. Teachers need to be unbiased so they can understand the subject truth fully.
This is the single most incredible series on evidence for Creation and a Biblical flood I've ever seen. I started out a couple months ago starting to research all of this evolution vs creationism, found this channel, and have been hooked. Seriously, these videos are so rich, and I love Dr. Kurt Wise's personality, he's just fun to listen to! Thank you for all the hard work you've put into making these videos.
My husband found a piece of fossilized coral (with clam burrows in it) in north western Colorado. I couldnt believe it until I saw it. It was in some mud hills. Thanks for posting. I really enjoy this.
Have you been to the Ark Exhibit in KY? It's just the other side of Cincinnati Ohio. Talk about mind blowing..... and then check out the Creation Museum half an hour south of there! Minimum 4 days of stuff to see and experience with both.
@@redfaux74 what was the cost of building that -idol- ark? $104,000,000.00? It hasn't saved one soul from the grips of death and hell. It's a business venture to make merchandise of the people that claim to be in the faith
Every time I see a sign in Wyoming-Montana- Colorado - that states, "These mountains and valleys show signs that they were underwater - but there was never a flood" - I just want to scream.
Not the kind of flood described in the bible. There isn't enough water in the entire world to cover the entire earth even if you melted every single glacier on the planet. That would mess with the coastlines but come nowhere near the elevations in the desert southwest or colorado.rockies, let alone the Himalayas.
Scream at plate tectonics. The sign of water is salt water of the ocean. Some mountains were at the ocean floor. They were flat surfaces until a force moved them vertically by thousands of feet. That is where shells similar to ocean shells are found at peaks.
NebTheWeb Wrong. There’s more water 3x over underground in water basins than there are in the oceans. Even the Bible says the fountains of the deep were opened up. That’s also where the waters receded. Good day to you.
@@nebtheweb8885 What about inside the earth? "On that day all the *springs of the vast watery deep* burst open and the floodgates of the heavens were opened." - Genesis 7:11.
@@nebtheweb8885 There is water underground you moron. There is also water in clouds and in the atmosphereAnd the Smokies were twice the size of the Rocky Mountains.
SungW, guy, if you only knew what you’re missing by taking these folks seriously. You don’t have to stop believing your religion to accept the idea that the “geologist” in the video is wrong about most of what he said.
Your ignorance is your downfall here, this so called geologist is a fake, most of what he says is baseless and does not correspond to evidence available, he goes against all the geological written, peer reviewed works across the centuries. We can use radiodating of several different isotopes and accurately to age these rocks, fossils etc. We can accurately age relatively new fossils with carbon 14 / 12 dating, we can use ice core samples to confirm accurately the carbon 14 in the atmosphere at the time these plants and animals die up to about 60 thousand yrs ago. We can use potassium 40 in very old rocks as it has a half life of 1.2billion yrs, we can get even more accuracy with argon 40 which is often now the prefered choice, argon 40 is created by the decay of potassium 40 and argon 40 will simply escape into the atmosphere while the rock is molten, once the rocks have solidified the argon 40 is trapped when it is created and we thus can establish when a rock was first formed with high accuracy, fossils are then aged by the rocks and sediment they are found in and not by trying to date them directly. The fact this guy wilfully ignores all this but often relies on the same science to shore up his own opinion exposes the cherry picking he does with the scientific finding we have, he only accepts things that fit his ideology and will automatically ignore the rest of it regardless of the evidence that supports it..the fact he takes this position means he is not a scientist nor a paleontologist as claimed, a true scientist would not accept the bible as been the ultimate truth that everything must agree with, any scientist worth any credibility would have to accept that anything written in the bible could be wrong and then they would gather their evidence and conclude their findings..... to date the scientific community has found no evidence for a god, has no requirement there is a god to answer its questions and does not use god as a default answer when we cannot work something out.
@@genome616 Isometric dating has some hurdles to overcome: 1. The assumption that the rate of decay has remained the same. If the flood occurred, (I only say, "if", so as to be hypothetical for your sake) then cataclysmic events would have resulted in accelerated decay. 2. Helium. Helium is found in abundance in Zircon (zirconium silicate) crystals in the granite rocks from all over the world. It has a diffusion rate of 6000 years (+or-2000), and the hotter the rock or the deeper in the earths atmosphere it comes from the faster it moves. If these rocks were billions of years old then helium should not be present in them at all and there should be much more helium in the earths atmosphere. Peer reviewed journals only act as a stronghold against creation scientists, and their evolutionary/old earth proponents, suggest that they are the source of where all true science must come through, and so naturally they won't even entertain the creationist scientific inquiries, experiments or discoveries unless they have been funneled through them. These are not the "peers" of young earth christian scientists, they don't want to see their scientific methods or their findings. it's a convenient insulator for them. It's obvious they are afraid. Christian scientists reject the idea that that extremely subjective medium is the dilemma for them to overcome, it's dishonest to the scientific method. Christian scientists have to perform all of their own experiments the good old-fashioned way. The old earth geologists got some splaining to do!
What i am thinking while i am watching this is this! This was a massively crazy destructive thing the flood was and we can't even imagine what it would have been like to live and die in this....Jesus My King said worse days then this r in the future! Think about that!
I wish I had had the opportunity to sit in his class when he first arrived at Bryan College. I was a senior and in a different line of study. This explanation is incredible. Thank you Dr. Wise!
I totally understand. I have found Petrified Pepper tree in the Blue Forest that is surrounded with algae. It must of been floating for a long time and mineralized from volcanoes.
Scientist who believe in God and creation are the only ones that show actual work and logical explanations where Atheist just want you to believe their made up drivel.
"Scientist who believe in God and creation are the only ones that show actual work and logical explanations" Kurt Wise proved he is not a scientist when he said "Although there are scientific reasons for accepting a young earth, I am a young age creationist because that is my understanding of the Scripture. As I shared with my professors years ago when I was in college, if all the evidence in the universe turns against creationism, I would be the first to admit it, but I would still be a creationist because that is what the Word of God seems to indicate." In plain English, he will reject the scientific evidence if it disproves his religious beliefs. This means he is not a scientist. " where Atheist just want you to believe their made up drivel." You're not making much sense. Atheism is a single position on a single question: does a god exist? The atheist position is that because they have seen no evidence for a god,they do not believe a god exists. It is NOT a claim that a god does not exist,it is a claim that the atheist has no belief that a god exists. That's atheism in it's entirety. What do you think atheist are making up?
I am an Atheist scientist and can confirm most of what he says is drivel and baseless and does not correspond to peer reviewed accepted geological papers, so please provide citation for any peer reviewed established and accepted theory that proves otherwise. You display a gross ignorance of real science hence your comment, this is often moulded from faith schooling where science is totally misrepresented to protect the writings of the bible, the guy in the video is actively cherry picking bits of science that fit the book but ignores wilfully the rest of it which is derived from the same scientific basis because it exposes the bible as been wrong in several areas.
The paleontologist in the video neglects to mention a timeframe when this catastrophic event occurred. The Noahitic Flood is usually attributed to have occurred approximately 2400 BC. -- That date is far too recent to explain the paleo evidence presented in this video. So while the fossil record he looks at does indeed present evidence of "a" catastrophic flood, its not "the Noahitic Flood". Keep in mind, the story of Noah's flood was probably borrowed from the much older Mesopotamian flood myth of Utnapishtim/Ziasudra/Gilgamesh -- The Judaian scribes/intelligentsia no doubt became enamored of the Gilgamesh story during their Babylonian Captivity. They borrowed that story, Judaized it, and then incorporated it into their founding myths of the nation of Israel. A far more compelling explanation for massive floods across North America than the Noah story, is the Younger Dryas Impact (YDI) theory, which posits a series of comet impacts centered across the northern hemisphere about 9,600 BC. The effects of these impacts caused sudden catastrophic events, including: melting of enormous (2 mile thick) ice-caps sitting on top of Canada and N. Europe. The melting caused a sudden rise of sea levels, likely inundating most coastal communities, permanently (the sea levels remain 400 ft higher than prior to those impacts). One such permanently inundated area: the Persian Gulf. Its likely those few individuals who escaped the permanent inundation of the Persian Gulf, rebuilt their homes in Sumer, and rebooted civilization in the Near East. --- Tales of their escape from that real flood eventually were mythologized into the Utnapishtim, Ziasudra & Gilgamesh.
@@cnault3244 - _"he will reject the scientific evidence if it disproves his religious beliefs. This means he's not a scientist."_ *It means he knows that scientists are quite often wrong, and that science itself has largely forsaken the scientific method.. leaving us with a framework in the natural sciences that is built on fallacy. If the evidence conflicts with his faith, he should choose his faith.*
Richard Dawkins was so wrong when complaining about how Dr Kurt Wise renounced evolution and deep ages. I think sir Dawkins needs to do the same. It would be a blessing for the world.
If this wasn't a river delta or formed by a large rock fall at 1:05 then it can certainly take millions of years for this after flood sediment to accumulate. I don't neccesarily know how those rocks formed After the flood either, there wouldn't be enough pressure. Like there's less moisture where I live but exposed sediment 8ft in depth is still soft enough to have worms & visible rocks you can dig out.
It's an awesome, and at the same time, slightly unsettling, reminder of just how Almighty our God, the Holy Trinity, really is. Humanity has no idea whom they are contending with. I am suddenly VERY GRATEFUL for the privilege of being on the same side as God. If only the world could understand: You really don't want God as an enemy.
Please, I hope the next installment picks up where this one left off, heading for the coal seam. I've seen some funny stuff in Pennsylvania coal, so please continue!
I have often asked people, What do you think Noah saw when he got off the Ark? The answer ,,,nothing. A barren wasteland, mountains stripped bare, valleys filled with mud and splintered trees. The stench of rot and decay. With a bit of vegetation, starting to grow here and there. I can't imagine the sorrow and grief, every thing and every one, he knew. Just flat gone. He walked the earth for 100 years telling his relatives, get on the Ark. That brings me to tears.
even crazier, he lived long enough post flood to see entire nations, forests and habitats spring forth from that barren wasteland. If you had to vote for a guy who 'saw some stuff', Noah would be a good choice.
You are forgetting something. Before he left that ark he sent out birds which came back with nothing. But finally had a bird return with a fresh olive leaf in it's beak. This shows that some trees survived and were even growing as the waters were receding. Remember is rained and flooded for only 40 days. It took several months for the water to recede. High elevations created by the weight of the water could have had living plants still on them which grew after the waters receded from them. So no, the Earth was not a total barren waist land after the flood.
While doing military training in the Middle East years ago, I found multiple fossilized shells a hundred miles away from the Mediterranean Sea. Also my gunny found a petrified piece of wood. Just there, in the middle of nowhere and surrounded by desert. To think it was all deposited by the flood is amazing.
And he admits that he will ignore all evidence that contradicts the Bible accounts. This demonstrates that despite having attained his degree,he is not a scientist. Kurt Wise: "Although there are scientific reasons for accepting a young earth, I am a young age creationist because that is my understanding of the Scripture. As I shared with my professors years ago when I was in college, if all the evidence in the universe turns against creationism, I would be the first to admit it, but I would still be a creationist because that is what the Word of God seems to indicate." The fact is, all the evidence DOES turn against creationism, but he has not admitted it. So along with not being a scientist, he is also a liar.
@@cnault3244 - So, he can't be considered a "scientist" because he would choose his faith over science.. In a world where "science" has an A priori commitment to allow *only materialistic explanations* that don't _"allow a divine foot in the door",_ regardless of the *patent absurdity* of those explanations, despite being *unsubstantiated,* no matter how *counter-intuitive,* and even *at the expense of truth...* Yeah.. being considered a "scientist" isn't what it used to be. *Most of us believed that scientists were engaged in the search for truth;* that they were trying to understand how things actually came to be, and how they actually worked. Now that we know the REALITY of the scientific AGENDA (eradication of the divine), how can we trust what scientists tell us? *Science has become PHILOSOPHY.* Simply cobbling together explanations is not good enough! The explanations must be TRUE!! And *if true explanations lead to a divine creator, then SO BE IT..!!*
@@cnault3244 - Do you trolls get paid to not watch Creation videos and just harass people in the comments? Just curious.... get a job and be a responsible citizen.
@@freemind.. - You're giving these goons too much credit. Atheism is not science, it is a religion like no other. It has the most amount of faith of them all. Just watch Richard Dawkins explain what nothing is.... Atheist completely ignore science intentionally. Don't confuse true science with their nonsense. Science is what can be tested, repeated, the same results with the same tests over and over. Let's see their evolution do any of that.
This brings up three questions in my mind. 1. Where did all of this water come from? 3. Where did the water go? 2. What was the effect of pre-flood mist instead of rain?
Thank you for your explanation of the flood. You have a way of explaining what occurred during the great flood to someone who doesn't know a lot about geology but I can easily grasp your explanations. I'm looking forward to hearing about the coal that was produced from the bark of these special type trees also your estimate when this flood occurred based on what you're seeing in the geology of the land. It would be nice if this series on Genesis History/ maybe renamed it Great Catechisms of the Recent Past was taught in all schools and to our adult population that grew up on the false science of millions of year theory taught as fact when it's actually just someone guesstimates.
This is paradigm-shifting. I never thought about the mess a flood causes. I just thought about the world like a bowl filled with water gradually and gently. Everything is still there in its place but soaked and when it drains, it looks the same with structures still in their place. But the Flood was obviously much more than just heavy rain for 40 straight days. Water-and everything else-was crashing out from everywhere! This gives you a clear picture so you can visualize the enormity of this event and how dreadful for those dying in it. (They asked for it but not the poor animals.)
You say the plants today are not the same as those trees in the rock layers. We know that the oxygen content and atmospheric pressure of the atmosphere, preflood, was higher, and that in those conditions plants grow bigger and faster. Maybe if we take the smaller plants of today and grew them in a hyperbaric chamber, would they grow as large?
But but the science is settled....mainstream science has become more of a consensus on opinions than a search for truth. Scientific breakthroughs have never been found by groups opinions, they have always been found by those who walk their own path regardless of scientific consensus. Keep up the good work!
Im in upstate SC . In my forest I have found evidence of some catastrophic event. huge sedimentary rocks flipped on their sides, huge cracks running through rock formations. Dont think it's freeze/thaw cycle as the rocks are pushed far apart and the crack edges line up like puzzle pieces. I would like this guy to come see me. Promise it's worth it. Also a huge pyramid mound on the land.
He broke up the gates of the great deep.... the waters sprang up AND fell from the sky for the first time for 40 days and 40 nights, then another what.... 150 days? Making for 190 days. I’m pretty sure it was exactly 191 days, exactly half a year, as Enoch describes. It’s just amazing.
very interesting. I was in Anchorage summer of 2017 and actually was able to view a portion of land where it suddenly dropped six feet during that earthquake!
You have to love Dr Wise - he is always so excited about flood geology. I'm glad there is at least one scientist who sees and understands the evidence contained in plain view all over the planet.
Benjamin Huygir Isn't it a pity then that science only operate by consensus. Wise's pseudo-science has (to coin a phrase) "been weighed in the balances and found wanting". BTW being a great actor isn't scientific either.
18:00 Tree with no "inner wood", essentially a plant. The world pre-flood was literally a different world. Everything was gigantic. I think of a Zucchini plant. Everything is hollow, you can make instruments out of the limbs. The pre-flood world was truly epic. A 3 foot dragonfly would land on a 9 foot leaf. We witness the same event take place today when a 3 inch dragonfly lands on a 9 inch leaf. Incredible... Absolutely incredible...
This is a pretty amazing video and I'm only 11 minutes in. Scary how this information would never be presented nowadays in the light this man is giving it.
In the Bighorn mountains on the Crow Indian reservation there are chunks of coral reef as big as a house and in some parts it looks like your walking on the bottom of the ocean it is amazing. And there are big slabs of salt in the sand where a creek called soap creek starts. It's really cool to see and on a short cut to Billings from ft Smith there are large blocks of salt in the canyon too.
And the heat hardens the sediments, to stone. Quickly.. and atmosphere changed, as well. Then man has 120 years to live, from the changed earth.. man got weaker. And smaller.. like the animals.. 👍
Well, let's try this again. I have an intense interest in this as I live in the coal fields of Southern Ohio. I've seen much of what you're showing without realizing just what I was looking at. I see trees portrayed in Sumerian wall carvings that would have formed the coal! How's that fit in with your timing for the flood? I see calamites and scaled trees. Also portrayed in some Indonesian temples.
That is pretty cool!! Can’t wait to see what awaits in Heaven. Your videos are great!! You did leave us hanging on seeing that coal bed though, maybe in your next video?
Fascinating! Great scientific observations made here. We know there was a deluge! The evidence is everywhere! I live in Mississippi. We have a peculiar geologic formation called loess soil and loess bluffs. Would live to hear his explanation for that. Seems to me that it's very fine sediment set down as the floodwaters drained down the Mississippi river.
we will appreciate if you can make an animation about this very complex and highly technical topic so we that are not geologist could appreciate and understand more about this interesting subject
Thank you for your feedback @joenettepelingon, We are currently putting the final touches on the animations for our next film, 𝘔𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴 𝘈𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘍𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘥, as we speak! The film is currently slated to be released this summer. You can keep up with our progress by signing up at the following link: mailchi.mp/isgenesishistory.com/pre-order
As a boy, on the tail end of the Appalachia mountains in Gallant, Alabama--behind my great grandmother's house--I picked up sea fossils all over the top of that mountain. I never doubted Noah's flood after that.
Persecuted Bible Believer "I picked up sea fossils all over the top of that mountain. I never doubted Noah's flood after that." Meanwhile, some of us have heard of plate tectonics. Yes, ignorance will have you believing all sorts of stupid things. Apt name.
So how much water would he estimate was over the sand? 1000, 10,000 feet? Earthquake vibrations tend to loosen things, unless there is a lot of weight upon them.
This is a fascinating series. This presents evidence and discusses openly the causes, instead of closed, authoritarian "because I said so"... I am new to this series. Is there a video(s) on this site that credits the Great Flood with breaking up Pangaea??
Though he says "rapid deposition" religiously without reason behind it. He says mountain tops eroded but that doesn't account for all the sediment or the ocean fossils attached to it. And he only comments on the size of siesmites triggered by earthquakes though that's not the only cause of siesmites (or soft sediment deformation). Sorry, I don't see the bubbles so it looks like another form of sediment deformation to me. Sorry but pangea was ages ago as well & tons of volcanoes have poured out since then which weren't all underwater. And you can date how fast the continents departed & that would mean mountains ranges & uplift was caused by plate tectonics. (All in a year, if causes by the flood)
This discussion of incredibly large lycopods is confirmation of what Genesis calls firmament (aka much higher atmospheric pressure) that existed pre-flood. Such firmament would be required to provide the necessary conditions to not only grow large lycopods and other giants, but also separate the waters above from the waters below.
That would be awesome to see a floating forest! 🌳 Unfortunately bipedal organisms such as ourselves would not be able to walk around in it since we would probably be too heavy and fall right through.
To read the account of the flood in the Bible is one thing, but to see the aftermath of it is truly incredible. Mind. Blown.
The flood in the Bible? That would be the one that the people in Europe,Asia, Africa, Australia,and North & South America didn't notice. Are you aware that there are earlier stories about global floods that predate the old testament story and make no mention of Noah?
@@cnault3244 of course. But the only reliable story is in the Bible. The Bible has been shown to be credible in all historical/archeological assertions.
@@hisnameisiam808 The bible sounds credible in some assertions. A fallacy of composition is not a way to prove the creationist flood though.
This specific example of these sedimentary layers being laid down simultaneously with massive earthquakes is explained in detail by Walt Brown in his free online book at www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ where he submits a viable alternative to the theory of Plate Tectonics. He calls this particular phenomenon 'liquefaction' instead of 'seismites'. Actually, I guess it would be more accurate to say that seismites are a small, specific area that falls under liquefaction. I highly recommend this book. His theory is based in physics and mathematics, due to his mechanical engineering degree from MIT. After reading it, you will wonder how we have allowed Plate Tectonics has continued to be taught with all the major problems with it! Enjoy!
Absolutely, for the earth to be off it's axis and african animal fossils found in ash falls Nebraska, I believe something happened even before the flood.
This is the best reason to think for yourself and allow yourself to examine real evidence. You will know the truth and the truth will set you free.
Bill Burkhalter if I’m not educated in the field of geology and geography but I wanted to learn about it I would choose to be educated by a non-religious academic. Teachers need to be unbiased so they can understand the subject truth fully.
@@rodneysettle8106 - “educated by a non-religious academic.”
- Opposed to being taught by Naturalist fundamentalist?
This is the single most incredible series on evidence for Creation and a Biblical flood I've ever seen. I started out a couple months ago starting to research all of this evolution vs creationism, found this channel, and have been hooked. Seriously, these videos are so rich, and I love Dr. Kurt Wise's personality, he's just fun to listen to! Thank you for all the hard work you've put into making these videos.
Was a pleasure to watch this man who LOVES what he has studied! Very exciting!
My husband found a piece of fossilized coral (with clam burrows in it) in north western Colorado. I couldnt believe it until I saw it. It was in some mud hills. Thanks for posting. I really enjoy this.
The most exciting lesson on "rocks" ever! I so enjoyed his enthusiasm.
Dr. Wise does a great job of painting the whole picture of what can be seen and how it got there.
This video is genius on another level. I'm at the same time humbled and in awe, seeing how God really did in the Flood what His Word said He did
Have you been to the Ark Exhibit in KY? It's just the other side of Cincinnati Ohio. Talk about mind blowing..... and then check out the Creation Museum half an hour south of there! Minimum 4 days of stuff to see and experience with both.
@@redfaux74 what was the cost of building that -idol- ark? $104,000,000.00?
It hasn't saved one soul from the grips of death and hell. It's a business venture to make merchandise of the people that claim to be in the faith
I live about a mile from Cave of the Winds. I'll never look at it the same way again!
Every time I see a sign in Wyoming-Montana- Colorado - that states, "These mountains and valleys show signs that they were underwater - but there was never a flood" - I just want to scream.
Not the kind of flood described in the bible. There isn't enough water in the entire world to cover the entire earth even if you melted every single glacier on the planet. That would mess with the coastlines but come nowhere near the elevations in the desert southwest or colorado.rockies, let alone the Himalayas.
Scream at plate tectonics. The sign of water is salt water of the ocean. Some mountains were at the ocean floor. They were flat surfaces until a force moved them vertically by thousands of feet. That is where shells similar to ocean shells are found at peaks.
NebTheWeb Wrong. There’s more water 3x over underground in water basins than there are in the oceans. Even the Bible says the fountains of the deep were opened up. That’s also where the waters receded. Good day to you.
@@nebtheweb8885 What about inside the earth?
"On that day all the *springs of the vast watery deep* burst open and the floodgates of the heavens were opened." - Genesis 7:11.
@@nebtheweb8885 There is water underground you moron. There is also water in clouds and in the atmosphereAnd the Smokies were twice the size of the Rocky Mountains.
Truth is neither right nor wrong,
it just IS.
Thank-you for your time putting this together for us.
The universe definitely has a maker
Again another wise scientist is here to tell the truth! I appreciate much for works made by saints like Dr. Kurt Wise!
SungW, guy, if you only knew what you’re missing by taking these folks seriously. You don’t have to stop believing your religion to accept the idea that the “geologist” in the video is wrong about most of what he said.
Your ignorance is your downfall here, this so called geologist is a fake, most of what he says is baseless and does not correspond to evidence available, he goes against all the geological written, peer reviewed works across the centuries.
We can use radiodating of several different isotopes and accurately to age these rocks, fossils etc. We can accurately age relatively new fossils with carbon 14 / 12 dating, we can use ice core samples to confirm accurately the carbon 14 in the atmosphere at the time these plants and animals die up to about 60 thousand yrs ago.
We can use potassium 40 in very old rocks as it has a half life of 1.2billion yrs, we can get even more accuracy with argon 40 which is often now the prefered choice, argon 40 is created by the decay of potassium 40 and argon 40 will simply escape into the atmosphere while the rock is molten, once the rocks have solidified the argon 40 is trapped when it is created and we thus can establish when a rock was first formed with high accuracy, fossils are then aged by the rocks and sediment they are found in and not by trying to date them directly.
The fact this guy wilfully ignores all this but often relies on the same science to shore up his own opinion exposes the cherry picking he does with the scientific finding we have, he only accepts things that fit his ideology and will automatically ignore the rest of it regardless of the evidence that supports it..the fact he takes this position means he is not a scientist nor a paleontologist as claimed, a true scientist would not accept the bible as been the ultimate truth that everything must agree with, any scientist worth any credibility would have to accept that anything written in the bible could be wrong and then they would gather their evidence and conclude their findings..... to date the scientific community has found no evidence for a god, has no requirement there is a god to answer its questions and does not use god as a default answer when we cannot work something out.
@@jeffreypowell1966 what is he wrong about?
@@genome616 Isometric dating has some hurdles to overcome:
1. The assumption that the rate of decay has remained the same. If the flood occurred, (I only say, "if", so as to be hypothetical for your sake) then cataclysmic events would have resulted in accelerated decay.
2. Helium. Helium is found in abundance in Zircon (zirconium silicate) crystals in the granite rocks from all over the world. It has a diffusion rate of 6000 years (+or-2000), and the hotter the rock or the deeper in the earths atmosphere it comes from the faster it moves. If these rocks were billions of years old then helium should not be present in them at all and there should be much more helium in the earths atmosphere.
Peer reviewed journals only act as a stronghold against creation scientists, and their evolutionary/old earth proponents, suggest that they are the source of where all true science must come through, and so naturally they won't even entertain the creationist scientific inquiries, experiments or discoveries unless they have been funneled through them. These are not the "peers" of young earth christian scientists, they don't want to see their scientific methods or their findings. it's a convenient insulator for them. It's obvious they are afraid. Christian scientists reject the idea that that extremely subjective medium is the dilemma for them to overcome, it's dishonest to the scientific method.
Christian scientists have to perform all of their own experiments the good old-fashioned way. The old earth geologists got some splaining to do!
@@jeffreypowell1966 name one false conclusion.
What i am thinking while i am watching this is this! This was a massively crazy destructive thing the flood was and we can't even imagine what it would have been like to live and die in this....Jesus My King said worse days then this r in the future! Think about that!
I wish I had had the opportunity to sit in his class when he first arrived at Bryan College. I was a senior and in a different line of study. This explanation is incredible. Thank you Dr. Wise!
Kurt, I love your enthusiasm for your topics - you're a great teacher!
You can hear his joy and passion as he speaks.
I’d love to have him as a professor!! So energetic. Also... super smart
I totally understand. I have found Petrified Pepper tree in the Blue Forest that is surrounded with algae. It must of been floating for a long time and mineralized from volcanoes.
Thanks for this video. It was not a simple flood it was much more. You are showing evidence and it could help those who think this flood is a myth
Scientist who believe in God and creation are the only ones that show actual work and logical explanations where Atheist just want you to believe their made up drivel.
"Scientist who believe in God and creation are the only ones that show actual work and logical explanations"
Kurt Wise proved he is not a scientist when he said "Although there are scientific reasons for accepting a young earth, I am a young age creationist because that is my understanding of the Scripture. As I shared with my professors years ago when I was in college, if all the evidence in the universe turns against creationism, I would be the first to admit it, but I would still be a creationist because that is what the Word of God seems to indicate."
In plain English, he will reject the scientific evidence if it disproves his religious beliefs. This means he is not a scientist.
" where Atheist just want you to believe their made up drivel."
You're not making much sense. Atheism is a single position on a single question: does a god exist? The atheist position is that because they have seen no evidence for a god,they do not believe a god exists. It is NOT a claim that a god does not exist,it is a claim that the atheist has no belief that a god exists. That's atheism in it's entirety.
What do you think atheist are making up?
I am an Atheist scientist and can confirm most of what he says is drivel and baseless and does not correspond to peer reviewed accepted geological papers, so please provide citation for any peer reviewed established and accepted theory that proves otherwise.
You display a gross ignorance of real science hence your comment, this is often moulded from faith schooling where science is totally misrepresented to protect the writings of the bible, the guy in the video is actively cherry picking bits of science that fit the book but ignores wilfully the rest of it which is derived from the same scientific basis because it exposes the bible as been wrong in several areas.
The paleontologist in the video neglects to mention a timeframe when this catastrophic event occurred. The Noahitic Flood is usually attributed to have occurred approximately 2400 BC. -- That date is far too recent to explain the paleo evidence presented in this video. So while the fossil record he looks at does indeed present evidence of "a" catastrophic flood, its not "the Noahitic Flood".
Keep in mind, the story of Noah's flood was probably borrowed from the much older Mesopotamian flood myth of Utnapishtim/Ziasudra/Gilgamesh -- The Judaian scribes/intelligentsia no doubt became enamored of the Gilgamesh story during their Babylonian Captivity. They borrowed that story, Judaized it, and then incorporated it into their founding myths of the nation of Israel.
A far more compelling explanation for massive floods across North America than the Noah story, is the Younger Dryas Impact (YDI) theory, which posits a series of comet impacts centered across the northern hemisphere about 9,600 BC. The effects of these impacts caused sudden catastrophic events, including: melting of enormous (2 mile thick) ice-caps sitting on top of Canada and N. Europe. The melting caused a sudden rise of sea levels, likely inundating most coastal communities, permanently (the sea levels remain 400 ft higher than prior to those impacts). One such permanently inundated area: the Persian Gulf. Its likely those few individuals who escaped the permanent inundation of the Persian Gulf, rebuilt their homes in Sumer, and rebooted civilization in the Near East. --- Tales of their escape from that real flood eventually were mythologized into the Utnapishtim, Ziasudra & Gilgamesh.
So mr atheist tell us how life began from rocks and water
@@cnault3244 - _"he will reject the scientific evidence if it disproves his religious beliefs. This means he's not a scientist."_
*It means he knows that scientists are quite often wrong, and that science itself has largely forsaken the scientific method.. leaving us with a framework in the natural sciences that is built on fallacy. If the evidence conflicts with his faith, he should choose his faith.*
Man I love how engaged this dude is when he's listening to someone speak
Richard Dawkins was so wrong when complaining about how Dr Kurt Wise renounced evolution and deep ages. I think sir Dawkins needs to do the same. It would be a blessing for the world.
If this wasn't a river delta or formed by a large rock fall at 1:05 then it can certainly take millions of years for this after flood sediment to accumulate.
I don't neccesarily know how those rocks formed After the flood either, there wouldn't be enough pressure. Like there's less moisture where I live but exposed sediment 8ft in depth is still soft enough to have worms & visible rocks you can dig out.
Richard Dawkins has shown himself to be a deceiver and not a scientist. Atheism is for the masses. Lucuferianism is the religion of the ruling class.
It's an awesome, and at the same time, slightly unsettling, reminder of just how Almighty our God, the Holy Trinity, really is. Humanity has no idea whom they are contending with. I am suddenly VERY GRATEFUL for the privilege of being on the same side as God. If only the world could understand: You really don't want God as an enemy.
Please, I hope the next installment picks up where this one left off, heading for the coal seam. I've seen some funny stuff in Pennsylvania coal, so please continue!
Please give a good example.
I have often asked people, What do you think Noah saw when he got off the Ark? The answer ,,,nothing. A barren wasteland, mountains stripped bare, valleys filled with mud and splintered trees. The stench of rot and decay. With a bit of vegetation, starting to grow here and there. I can't imagine the sorrow and grief, every thing and every one, he knew. Just flat gone. He walked the earth for 100 years telling his relatives, get on the Ark. That brings me to tears.
even crazier, he lived long enough post flood to see entire nations, forests and habitats spring forth from that barren wasteland. If you had to vote for a guy who 'saw some stuff', Noah would be a good choice.
You are forgetting something. Before he left that ark he sent out birds which came back with nothing. But finally had a bird return with a fresh olive leaf in it's beak. This shows that some trees survived and were even growing as the waters were receding. Remember is rained and flooded for only 40 days. It took several months for the water to recede. High elevations created by the weight of the water could have had living plants still on them which grew after the waters receded from them. So no, the Earth was not a total barren waist land after the flood.
@@BM-si2ei even crazier to think that his great grand children went their own way, just like the folks from before the flood..
This is a perfect example of the Younger Dryaas event and it's enormous power and influence on the land.
While doing military training in the Middle East years ago, I found multiple fossilized shells a hundred miles away from the Mediterranean Sea. Also my gunny found a petrified piece of wood. Just there, in the middle of nowhere and surrounded by desert. To think it was all deposited by the flood is amazing.
Dr. Wise looks at details many overlook. Great explanations...
And he admits that he will ignore all evidence that contradicts the Bible accounts. This demonstrates that despite having attained his degree,he is not a scientist.
Kurt Wise: "Although there are scientific reasons for accepting a young earth, I am a young age creationist because that is my understanding of the Scripture. As I shared with my professors years ago when I was in college, if all the evidence in the universe turns against creationism, I would be the first to admit it, but I would still be a creationist because that is what the Word of God seems to indicate."
The fact is, all the evidence DOES turn against creationism, but he has not admitted it. So along with not being a scientist, he is also a liar.
But obviously wrong
@@cnault3244 - So, he can't be considered a "scientist" because he would choose his faith over science.. In a world where "science" has an A priori commitment to allow *only materialistic explanations* that don't _"allow a divine foot in the door",_ regardless of the *patent absurdity* of those explanations, despite being *unsubstantiated,* no matter how *counter-intuitive,* and even *at the expense of truth...* Yeah.. being considered a "scientist" isn't what it used to be.
*Most of us believed that scientists were engaged in the search for truth;* that they were trying to understand how things actually came to be, and how they actually worked. Now that we know the REALITY of the scientific AGENDA (eradication of the divine), how can we trust what scientists tell us? *Science has become PHILOSOPHY.* Simply cobbling together explanations is not good enough! The explanations must be TRUE!! And *if true explanations lead to a divine creator, then SO BE IT..!!*
@@cnault3244 - Do you trolls get paid to not watch Creation videos and just harass people in the comments? Just curious.... get a job and be a responsible citizen.
@@freemind.. - You're giving these goons too much credit. Atheism is not science, it is a religion like no other. It has the most amount of faith of them all. Just watch Richard Dawkins explain what nothing is.... Atheist completely ignore science intentionally. Don't confuse true science with their nonsense. Science is what can be tested, repeated, the same results with the same tests over and over. Let's see their evolution do any of that.
These lectures give me an idea of what it took to form the post flood world. Very good info indeed, thanks!
This is absolutely fascinating. It changes the way I look at everything! He is so smart I am becoming addicted to learning about this!
This is fascinating! The earth's geology clearly displays evidence of incomparable natural events surrounding a global cataclysmic flood.
I love listening to smart guys!
Thank you for this gift of true science in this age of "man's intellect"!
WOW...Kurt can get VERY enthusiastic, can't he? I'll bet he's JUST as on fire for the Lord!
Fantastic work!!!!!!!!! I wish you had been my teacher when I was young
This brings up three questions in my mind. 1. Where did all of this water come from? 3. Where did the water go? 2. What was the effect of pre-flood mist instead of rain?
Man, this is just incredible to think about, can totally see (mind's eye) how this happened in the flood!
@Ganga Din Is that a problem for you?
Fascinating science and history. Thank you.
It's not science.
Thank you for your explanation of the flood. You have a way of explaining what occurred during the great flood to someone who doesn't know a lot about geology but I can easily grasp your explanations. I'm looking forward to hearing about the coal that was produced from the bark of these special type trees also your estimate when this flood occurred based on what you're seeing in the geology of the land. It would be nice if this series on Genesis History/ maybe renamed it Great Catechisms of the Recent Past was taught in all schools and to our adult population that grew up on the false science of millions of year theory taught as fact when it's actually just someone guesstimates.
This is paradigm-shifting. I never thought about the mess a flood causes. I just thought about the world like a bowl filled with water gradually and gently. Everything is still there in its place but soaked and when it drains, it looks the same with structures still in their place.
But the Flood was obviously much more than just heavy rain for 40 straight days. Water-and everything else-was crashing out from everywhere! This gives you a clear picture so you can visualize the enormity of this event and how dreadful for those dying in it. (They asked for it but not the poor animals.)
Janet Gaurie Animals but not human babies? How did THEY manage to ask for it?
Kurt is the super star of geology.
You say the plants today are not the same as those trees in the rock layers. We know that the oxygen content and atmospheric pressure of the atmosphere, preflood, was higher, and that in those conditions plants grow bigger and faster. Maybe if we take the smaller plants of today and grew them in a hyperbaric chamber, would they grow as large?
But but the science is settled....mainstream science has become more of a consensus on opinions than a search for truth. Scientific breakthroughs have never been found by groups opinions, they have always been found by those who walk their own path regardless of scientific consensus. Keep up the good work!
Im in upstate SC . In my forest I have found evidence of some catastrophic event. huge sedimentary rocks flipped on their sides, huge cracks running through rock formations. Dont think it's freeze/thaw cycle as the rocks are pushed far apart and the crack edges line up like puzzle pieces. I would like this guy to come see me. Promise it's worth it. Also a huge pyramid mound on the land.
He broke up the gates of the great deep.... the waters sprang up AND fell from the sky for the first time for 40 days and 40 nights, then another what.... 150 days? Making for 190 days. I’m pretty sure it was exactly 191 days, exactly half a year, as Enoch describes. It’s just amazing.
Just awesome. God's peace be with you all.
Just dropping by to say how simultaneously brilliant and hilarious Kurt Wise is. I could listen to him speak for days.
very interesting. I was in Anchorage summer of 2017 and actually was able to view a portion of land where it suddenly dropped six feet during that earthquake!
This is great content. Hats off to the producer.
You have to love Dr Wise - he is always so excited about flood geology. I'm glad there is at least one scientist who sees and understands the evidence contained in plain view all over the planet.
Benjamin Huygir Isn't it a pity then that science only operate by consensus. Wise's pseudo-science has (to coin a phrase) "been weighed in the balances and found wanting". BTW being a great actor isn't scientific either.
18:00 Tree with no "inner wood", essentially a plant. The world pre-flood was literally a different world. Everything was gigantic. I think of a Zucchini plant. Everything is hollow, you can make instruments out of the limbs. The pre-flood world was truly epic. A 3 foot dragonfly would land on a 9 foot leaf. We witness the same event take place today when a 3 inch dragonfly lands on a 9 inch leaf.
Incredible... Absolutely incredible...
Beautfull lacture. I wish I have been studying with such a Professor like dr Wise.
God bless Dr Kurt for this explanation.
Why didn’t I hear of this in my geography class in high school?!
Excellent evidence for a major event.
An excellent production thank you. God bless you
All I can say is wow!
another wonderful video full of awesome knowledge about the past and processes that took place on earth !
This is a pretty amazing video and I'm only 11 minutes in. Scary how this information would never be presented nowadays in the light this man is giving it.
He can publish it if he wants. Just looks like soft sediment deformation though
Love it!!! Evidence of the flood for dummies, I love it.
Thank you for doing this. May The Lord bless your efforts!
In the Bighorn mountains on the Crow Indian reservation there are chunks of coral reef as big as a house and in some parts it looks like your walking on the bottom of the ocean it is amazing. And there are big slabs of salt in the sand where a creek called soap creek starts. It's really cool to see and on a short cut to Billings from ft Smith there are large blocks of salt in the canyon too.
That's awesome. People find tons of shark teeth & such in the Midwest too from where the western interior seaway was believed to be, before uplift.
I’ve been to the big south fork. I knew that’s where you were. Great information.
And the heat hardens the sediments, to stone. Quickly.. and atmosphere changed, as well. Then man has 120 years to live, from the changed earth.. man got weaker. And smaller.. like the animals.. 👍
Well, let's try this again. I have an intense interest in this as I live in the coal fields of Southern Ohio. I've seen much of what you're showing without realizing just what I was looking at. I see trees portrayed in Sumerian wall carvings that would have formed the coal! How's that fit in with your timing for the flood? I see calamites and scaled trees. Also portrayed in some Indonesian temples.
fountains of the deep opened up
Exactly. Many folks think the flood was local and caused by only a rainstorm
Your joy and love of your pursuits are apparent, & with humour Inc
That is pretty cool!! Can’t wait to see what awaits in Heaven. Your videos are great!! You did leave us hanging on seeing that coal bed though, maybe in your next video?
We'll be studying and finding out new things into all eternity. Amen!
Will there be a part 2 for where the discussion was left off?
Absolutely loved this topic and officially fastinated 👍💖 Thank you very much for sharing this.
Yeah, I’d love to pay him for an education!
Great video! Fascinating information. Thank you!
You left me wanting more. Lol.
Very cool info! Thanks so much.
Fascinating. I could listen to these guys all day.
Our God is an awesome God!
Fascinating! Great scientific observations made here. We know there was a deluge! The evidence is everywhere! I live in Mississippi. We have a peculiar geologic formation called loess soil and loess bluffs. Would live to hear his explanation for that. Seems to me that it's very fine sediment set down as the floodwaters drained down the Mississippi river.
There were many deluges. There just wasn’t a global one.
The 1811 earthquake changed your geography immensely.
@@peteconrad2077 - Oh, but there most certainly WAS a Global Flood.
we will appreciate if you can make an animation about this very complex and highly technical topic so we that are not geologist could appreciate and understand more about this interesting subject
Thank you for your feedback @joenettepelingon,
We are currently putting the final touches on the animations for our next film, 𝘔𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴 𝘈𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘍𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘥, as we speak! The film is currently slated to be released this summer. You can keep up with our progress by signing up at the following link:
mailchi.mp/isgenesishistory.com/pre-order
As a boy, on the tail end of the Appalachia mountains in Gallant, Alabama--behind my great grandmother's house--I picked up sea fossils all over the top of that mountain. I never doubted Noah's flood after that.
Persecuted Bible Believer
"I picked up sea fossils all over the top of that mountain. I never doubted Noah's flood after that."
Meanwhile, some of us have heard of plate tectonics. Yes, ignorance will have you believing all sorts of stupid things. Apt name.
An shining example of how confirmation bias can twist the proper way to interpret evidence.
So how much water would he estimate was over the sand? 1000, 10,000 feet? Earthquake vibrations tend to loosen things, unless there is a lot of weight upon them.
This is a fascinating series. This presents evidence and discusses openly the causes, instead of closed, authoritarian "because I said so"...
I am new to this series. Is there a video(s) on this site that credits the Great Flood with breaking up Pangaea??
Though he says "rapid deposition" religiously without reason behind it.
He says mountain tops eroded but that doesn't account for all the sediment or the ocean fossils attached to it. And he only comments on the size of siesmites triggered by earthquakes though that's not the only cause of siesmites (or soft sediment deformation). Sorry, I don't see the bubbles so it looks like another form of sediment deformation to me.
Sorry but pangea was ages ago as well & tons of volcanoes have poured out since then which weren't all underwater. And you can date how fast the continents departed & that would mean mountains ranges & uplift was caused by plate tectonics. (All in a year, if causes by the flood)
Most interesting subject to say the least.
This discussion of incredibly large lycopods is confirmation of what Genesis calls firmament (aka much higher atmospheric pressure) that existed pre-flood. Such firmament would be required to provide the necessary conditions to not only grow large lycopods and other giants, but also separate the waters above from the waters below.
Why would higher atmospheric pressure create conditions for giant lycopods?
Kurt wise is captivating
What amazing intelligence it takes to see and interpret this forensic evidence of the earth.
That is absolutely amazing.
That would be awesome to see a floating forest! 🌳
Unfortunately bipedal organisms such as ourselves would not be able to walk around in it since we would probably be too heavy and fall right through.
Eye opening.
I love content like this. It helps reaffirm what I believe is truth.
creation science is the coming scientific renaissance.
I love these shows they are so interesting!
The hydroplate theory offers insight into what likely happened based on real evidence just like this. Good stuff.
Floating forests make more sense than big empty oceans from a design perspective. I never wondered about it but why we haven't done it.
That's some prime real estate; you can relocate whenever the scenery gets boring, or the climate gets too hot or cold
Absolutely GREAT video!
Interesting presentation. Given the violence of the sea and ripping up of forests and mountains etc how did the ark survive?
So amazing
Outstanding, thank you.
God bless and protect you and enlarge your ministry. +🙏
If we could only go back in time and watch these events.
from the ark, preferably.