Mike Tyson is also one of the greatest examples of counterpuncher. That style, peak-a-boo, is all about counterpunching by aggressively closing the gap while remaining elusive with great head movement and footwork
Yes you are right, but I think if you had to put in in one category only, then I think he would fit more in the swarmer category than in the counterpuncher category, what do you think?
Nicely said , I too think mike tyson is more of a swarmer because of his small height he utilized in fighting, but as always that's ny opinion😅😅@@IMUSUMI
@@IMUSUMIAgeee. He's the quintessential swarmer. He's just more successful than most...as you can't be a good swarmer without having good defence coming forward & counterpunching
I’d say Inoue is a complete fighter, crawford is fair to put there, but I’d also say that Hagler is a complete fighter too, he’d outbox you, bang with you, do whatever he had to do to win.
@@PartyCrasher04 thanks I just gave it a rewatch. Saw some super nice inside work in rounds 3/4. Mostly attacking on exit I’m tryna see how he hangs on the inside, like what we’d get from Hagler or Duran. And like how his brother fought last weekend
@@Nothing.T I saw it live bro. I remembered it as Tapales besting Inoue on the inside, esp to the body. And that Inoue’s gameplan was work @midrange like usual. Gonna rewatch it too 😂. I also think it may have been Inoue’s worst performance, or ~ his least dominant performance outside of Donaire 1.
I think everyone completely misrepresents foreman sadly. Yes his power was incredible, but he was by no means a non technical fighter. You don't get to be world champ without actual skill and thought.
You are right He was very skillful and he cant be conpared to the likes of deontay wilder. But I think there would be no better category where he would fit in. Even when you rewatch the fight with Joe Frazier, he is a technical genius. In which category would you put him in? Great comment
@SuperAFG47 in my opinion He was a mix of pressure and slugger he was able to effectively control the ring and almost never backed down. He also controlled and softened his opponents punches by framing. Slugger of course because of his overwhelming power and the ability to find knockouts unconventionally. (Walk-up uppercut, long hooks to the temple etc.)
@@IMUSUMIIn my opinion he was a inside pressure fighter,He had incredible ring cutting skills and when he reached his opponent or his opponent went at him like Joe Fraizer,he used arm manipulation tactics like the ones shown in this video but also body manipulation tactics which he used to stop punches before they came out and throw his opponent off balance and as a setup for his uppercuts and body hooks
When I first started boxing at the age of 14 I was more of a pressure fighter. Being young, carefree, not using my brain so much, maybe a little immature even, id generally go straight at my opponents, staying on them for the duration of the fight, punching and punching none stop, or at least until i had absolutely nothing left in the tank. And not really worrying, or thinking about what was coming back. Inevitably id end up taking way more punches than I needed to. This tactic is fine when you're young, strong and fresh. But you cannot fight like that indefinitely, it ends up taking its toll on you.
I don’t think Foreman was a slugger. He often used high IQ guard manipulation techniques on his opponents, not to mention his smart defense with the cross arm guard. I feel like Foreman was much more of a pressure fighter. The only time he looked like a slugger was vs Muhammad Ali
@@CatchTheMarmosets Yeah. I think Earnie Shavers is the best example. Tbh, George Foreman did throw lots of weird punches, like his kidney shots. But still, he had a plan behind it all
@@Ricardo7250 yes George has a lot of smarts people dont give him credit for, he had immense power and great strategy, if all he had was power he would have a record more in line with shavers, perhaps even lower knockout rate because Foreman has to work to knock you out unlike Shavers who just bulldozes you with every punch
I think George Foreman is more of a Boxer puncher who is between being a pressure fighter and an inside fighter depending on who he was fighting. Although of course he did not shy away of a slugfest like in his fight with Ron Lyle
@@jmgonzales7701 Yeah I always viewed it that way, they throw bombs but with great technique and timing, they aren't just going for it, they are waiting and launching a powerful strike when the time calls for it. Bob satterfield is one who I would call a boxer-puncher, whilst Saad Muhammad is a slugger, you can see the difference between the 2 despite both being known knockout artists
First of I believe Pressurefighting and Swarming are the exact same thing. Counterpunching is not style, it's an element of one that can be implemented of one of three big boxing styles out-boxing, in-fighting and slugging. I would also say that there is for sure subcategories to these three styles. Out+In Fighter=Complete Fighter/Allrounder; Out+Slugger=Boxer-Puncher; In Fighter+Slugger=Brawler. It's a huge misconception, that Sluggers are technically incompetent. George Foreman is a very skilled fighter. Other Aspects that add to these Styles and Substyles are as mentioned Counterpunching, Guard manipulating and Switch Stance Boxing. Very rarely you also got people like Emmanuel Augustus or Ben Whitaker who use basically drunken boxing, which is not seen positively by jury but still exists in boxing.
My list Outboxer - Muhammad Ali Swarmer - Joe Frazier ,Joe Louis Counter puncher - Floyd Infighter - Mike Tyson Boxer puncher - pacman Slugger - Jack Dempsey Complete Fighter - SRR .
What would you say Thomas Hearns was? I feel like he was an anomaly despite maybe being classified as an outboxer, that reach and jab speed combination are just so unique, and that chopping right cross had some pretty scary power too.
Joe Frazier is the best example of a swarmer. Roberto Duran is definitely a swarmer, but for example, on his fight against Barkley, he often refused to fight in the close range. So I think there are more sides to Duran style. Is Mike Tyson a swarmer? Maybe so but it also feels like he is a counterpuncher
George Foreman is not a good example of a Slugger He did have great abilities in addition to his power,In my opinion he was an inside pressure fighter. He used his great skills to cut the ring in the first engagements of the fight, constantly harassing his opponent in the mid-range with his Jab and when he managed to reach the inside he dismantled his opponent by manipulating his opponent's arms to open his guards like cans and also using body manipulation to take them off balance and as part of his defense to deflect punches A better example of the quintessential Slugger would be Earnie Shavers the greatest raw power that a ring had the honor of having a fight
I have a question I combine karate and boxing what style would I be since I use karate blocks and takedowns and boxing punches and both styles movements
I dont think its easy to give you a boxing style when you mix it with karate takedowns tbh, you should compare only your boxing skills with the ones in a video then just call it something like karate-slugger lmao
Hard to tell because blocking in boxing has quite some varieties depending on the guard you're using. Olympic Karate usually looks like a Out-Boxing Style since you have a kind of pendulum step. You also use Switch Stance and the Guard is fairly Standard and sometimes even Hands down. Basically with Karate in Boxing you would Count as type of Counterpunching Out-Boxer with a Standard or Hands down Guard which uses a bladed Pendulum step. This is found more often in Soviet Style Boring. That's why it boggles my mind when Mike Tyson said once that he uses Karate in Boxing because he never looked anything like a Karate Fighter.
Sugar Ray Robinson was that rare complete complete fighter and the greatest fighter p for p that ever lived, he could out box out slug and knock you out with either hand. and could probably beat any mma fighter, that's right I said it and I stand by what I say.
Sugar Ray was one of the best boxers, if not the best boxer, to do it. But making the mma claim is just ignorant and you know it. Saying shit like that doesn’t do anything to further his legacy, it just sets up an argument that need not take place. The best fighters of any given combat sport are the best within their specific ruleset. Robinson is 100% optimally trained for boxing, 0% trained for kicks, takedowns and grappling. It’s not a difficult concept.
@@fivefootfive9671, None the less I still stand by what I said. SRR was a hybrid of a fighter/boxer/ puncher / slugger, who could adapt to any style or form of fighting, in his era as well as the 80's and 90's era boxing was real fighting, unfortunately it's not like that anymore, boxing has become a boring sport to watch.
@fivefootfive9671 I practically agree with you but somewhat can't help think that the further you go back in the past, some boxers would probably put up a better fight against mma fighters than the modern ones now. This is because if I recall correctly, back then, some boxers had wrestling experience or wrestled to some extent as part of their strength training. Please give insight if you think I'm wrong. P.S. Funnily enough, Terrence Crawfard, if he learned how to check kicks, could probably challenge an mma fighter with some legitimate confidence due to his wrestling experience.
Crawford and Iron Mike. Iron Mikes shuffle step or whatever its called would have him shift to south paw to gain a better angle for lead hooks n stuff. He just did it so fast people didn't even notice the subtle shift in stance even after they got nailed.
Tyson doesn’t actually like to fight on the inside, he’s a mid-range counterpunching pressure fighter. From what I know Holyfield beat him by taking the fight there
You mean for yourself? If yes, you have to figure it out by yourself or get the help of your Coach, everyone has his individual style and attributes. For example, you can't be a slugger with no punching Power
you should compare the attributes in the video to your body, and no you dont NEED to pick one, you could be a mix, most people have a little of mix in their styles
Ain't Hagler a switch boxer? I remember Hagler trapped Hearns into rope with switch stance. I also remember Pirog KOed Jacobs with a switch step. Oh and Fury iirc. Are switch boxer really that common?
Yes hagler is one of the best switch hitters ever. There arent that many who use both stances and even the most that do, arent equally good in both stances
@@IMUSUMI Can you do a more in depth explanation here between them? Because I’ve always known swarmers and sluggers are seperate but I though both would be considered pressure fighters due to their aggression and constant movement forward
The difference between Swarmers and Pressure fighter. Pressure fighters aren't supposed to be short, they can be any height and reach. Their targets is to pressureise you and corner you. And attack you with hooks and uppercuts. They also uses jab in low quantity for inserting dominance. They need stamina because they don't backup they always will hit you and would throw more punches on score card so they can win even in decision vice. Swarmers are similar, they also need high stamina. But they are supposed to be short. Their main target is to get inside you. The don't use the same extreme pressure that Pressure fighters use. They also posses extreme head moments so they can escape jabs from taller fighters. Soon as they get inside the fighter they throw uppercut and hooks tremendously and knock you out. An example for Pressure fighter is Manny Pacquiao and Julio Chavez An example for Swarmer is not Mike Tyson, he's a Counter puncher. It's Joe Frazier and Rocky Marciano.
@@StoogesTheTwo Pressure fighters push forwards but they generally don't go on the inside, Ken Norton was a pressure fighter, yet he still kept distance. Swarmers push forwards but they DO get on the inside, they get close and like to bury their man under a barage of punches, Doug Jones is a good example. Basically, swarmers like to be inside and throw alot of punches, whilst pressure fighters like to back their man up and force a mistake to capitalise on. Is how I would put it
Yeah,my boxing style is the "be the punching bag style" 😂
Mike Tyson is also one of the greatest examples of counterpuncher. That style, peak-a-boo, is all about counterpunching by aggressively closing the gap while remaining elusive with great head movement and footwork
Yes you are right, but I think if you had to put in in one category only, then I think he would fit more in the swarmer category than in the counterpuncher category, what do you think?
Nicely said , I too think mike tyson is more of a swarmer because of his small height he utilized in fighting, but as always that's ny opinion😅😅@@IMUSUMI
@@IMUSUMIAgeee. He's the quintessential swarmer. He's just more successful than most...as you can't be a good swarmer without having good defence coming forward & counterpunching
@SuperAFG47 you can be any of the four styles while also being a counter puncher.
Tyson is a counter puncher swarmer.
I’d say Inoue is a complete fighter, crawford is fair to put there, but I’d also say that Hagler is a complete fighter too, he’d outbox you, bang with you, do whatever he had to do to win.
When have we seen Inoue on the inside or clinch fighting?
@@Chente_Bui when he fought Jason Moloney, he beat moloney at his own game which was inside work and then dismantled him so he couldn’t do anything
@@PartyCrasher04 thanks I just gave it a rewatch. Saw some super nice inside work in rounds 3/4. Mostly attacking on exit
I’m tryna see how he hangs on the inside, like what we’d get from Hagler or Duran. And like how his brother fought last weekend
@@Chente_BuiBro watch his las fight wtf 😀
@@Nothing.T I saw it live bro. I remembered it as Tapales besting Inoue on the inside, esp to the body. And that Inoue’s gameplan was work @midrange like usual. Gonna rewatch it too 😂.
I also think it may have been Inoue’s worst performance, or ~ his least dominant performance outside of Donaire 1.
I think everyone completely misrepresents foreman sadly. Yes his power was incredible, but he was by no means a non technical fighter. You don't get to be world champ without actual skill and thought.
You are right He was very skillful and he cant be conpared to the likes of deontay wilder. But I think there would be no better category where he would fit in. Even when you rewatch the fight with Joe Frazier, he is a technical genius. In which category would you put him in?
Great comment
Evander holyfield
@SuperAFG47 in my opinion He was a mix of pressure and slugger he was able to effectively control the ring and almost never backed down. He also controlled and softened his opponents punches by framing. Slugger of course because of his overwhelming power and the ability to find knockouts unconventionally. (Walk-up uppercut, long hooks to the temple etc.)
you can be a technical slugger you just dont really need to be a slugger
@@IMUSUMIIn my opinion he was a inside pressure fighter,He had incredible ring cutting skills and when he reached his opponent or his opponent went at him like Joe Fraizer,he used arm manipulation tactics like the ones shown in this video but also body manipulation tactics which he used to stop punches before they came out and throw his opponent off balance and as a setup for his uppercuts and body hooks
Sugar Ray Robinson is the prime example of a complete fighter
dudes John Boxing
delivered the important info in a timely manner & even gave examples thank you🙌🏾
When I first started boxing at the age of 14 I was more of a pressure fighter. Being young, carefree, not using my brain so much, maybe a little immature even, id generally go straight at my opponents, staying on them for the duration of the fight, punching and punching none stop, or at least until i had absolutely nothing left in the tank. And not really worrying, or thinking about what was coming back. Inevitably id end up taking way more punches than I needed to.
This tactic is fine when you're young, strong and fresh. But you cannot fight like that indefinitely, it ends up taking its toll on you.
I don’t think Foreman was a slugger. He often used high IQ guard manipulation techniques on his opponents, not to mention his smart defense with the cross arm guard. I feel like Foreman was much more of a pressure fighter. The only time he looked like a slugger was vs Muhammad Ali
Yes, Earnie Shavers is a great example of a slugger
@@CatchTheMarmosets Yeah. I think Earnie Shavers is the best example. Tbh, George Foreman did throw lots of weird punches, like his kidney shots. But still, he had a plan behind it all
@@Ricardo7250 yes George has a lot of smarts people dont give him credit for, he had immense power and great strategy, if all he had was power he would have a record more in line with shavers, perhaps even lower knockout rate because Foreman has to work to knock you out unlike Shavers who just bulldozes you with every punch
I think George Foreman is more of a Boxer puncher who is between being a pressure fighter and an inside fighter depending on who he was fighting.
Although of course he did not shy away of a slugfest like in his fight with Ron Lyle
@@BaldianOfIbelin when he came out of retirement? Yes. Beforehand he was just a brawler tho
Joe Louis is the definition of a boxer puncher and complete fighter so is Evander Holyfield
2 greats
Being a boxer puncher is the best because its technically technical slugging. Looking for the best punch but calculated risk.
@@jmgonzales7701 Yeah I always viewed it that way, they throw bombs but with great technique and timing, they aren't just going for it, they are waiting and launching a powerful strike when the time calls for it.
Bob satterfield is one who I would call a boxer-puncher, whilst Saad Muhammad is a slugger, you can see the difference between the 2 despite both being known knockout artists
@@jmgonzales7701 a pure boxer can beat a boxer puncher.
ricardo lopez is one of the most complete fighters in my opinion
First of I believe Pressurefighting and Swarming are the exact same thing. Counterpunching is not style, it's an element of one that can be implemented of one of three big boxing styles out-boxing, in-fighting and slugging. I would also say that there is for sure subcategories to these three styles. Out+In Fighter=Complete Fighter/Allrounder; Out+Slugger=Boxer-Puncher; In Fighter+Slugger=Brawler. It's a huge misconception, that Sluggers are technically incompetent. George Foreman is a very skilled fighter. Other Aspects that add to these Styles and Substyles are as mentioned Counterpunching, Guard manipulating and Switch Stance Boxing. Very rarely you also got people like Emmanuel Augustus or Ben Whitaker who use basically drunken boxing, which is not seen positively by jury but still exists in boxing.
Out fighter, counter puncher, and Philly shell is a good combo seen w/ Mayweather
My list
Outboxer - Muhammad Ali
Swarmer - Joe Frazier ,Joe Louis
Counter puncher - Floyd
Infighter - Mike Tyson
Boxer puncher - pacman
Slugger - Jack Dempsey
Complete Fighter - SRR .
What would you say Thomas Hearns was? I feel like he was an anomaly despite maybe being classified as an outboxer, that reach and jab speed combination are just so unique, and that chopping right cross had some pretty scary power too.
I would say maybe a mix of an out boxer and boxer/puncher?
He had legendary power
I was going to ask this! But yeah as the creator vid said he seems like an outboxer/boxer-puncher
Joe Frazier is the best example of a swarmer. Roberto Duran is definitely a swarmer, but for example, on his fight against Barkley, he often refused to fight in the close range. So I think there are more sides to Duran style. Is Mike Tyson a swarmer? Maybe so but it also feels like he is a counterpuncher
Boxer/puncher
Miguel Cotto
w
In my opinion, one of the best counter punchers is/was James Toney despite probably being more recognised for his great defensive abilities.
Yes, he definitely didn't get enough recognition at his time
Which is surprising considering a counter puncher thats also awesome at defending himself is a tough opponent
Awesome video
Text to speech really said “vol-no-rabble” for vulnerable lmao
Underrated
💪🏼
What would we count Salvador Sanchez as? Boxer-puncher? Seems right. Also Wilfred Benitez is another good example of counterpunchers
Lennox Lewis, is a complete Fighter
Currently I am practicing to be a switch-hitter, that way I can match my opponent's stance and its not so hard to counter
I hate it when I am VAL-NOR-ABEL when boxing.
Hahahahahah
Great explanation bro this need more views
Thank you brother appreciate it
Hey look , it’s a pwncher!
I aim to be a good Swarm/good pressure fighter. I am less capable with the other styles.
The hard hitting Edwin valero is a boxer puncher
Every one of these styles is valid, just need to find the living proof.
George Foreman is not a good example of a Slugger He did have great abilities in addition to his power,In my opinion he was an inside pressure fighter. He used his great skills to cut the ring in the first engagements of the fight, constantly harassing his opponent in the mid-range with his Jab and when he managed to reach the inside he dismantled his opponent by manipulating his opponent's arms to open his guards like cans and also using body manipulation to take them off balance and as part of his defense to deflect punches
A better example of the quintessential Slugger would be Earnie Shavers the greatest raw power that a ring had the honor of having a fight
Sugar Ray Robinson is one of the few complete fighters who could actually do everything fantastically
I have a question I combine karate and boxing what style would I be since I use karate blocks and takedowns and boxing punches and both styles movements
I dont think its easy to give you a boxing style when you mix it with karate takedowns tbh, you should compare only your boxing skills with the ones in a video then just call it something like karate-slugger lmao
Hard to tell because blocking in boxing has quite some varieties depending on the guard you're using. Olympic Karate usually looks like a Out-Boxing Style since you have a kind of pendulum step. You also use Switch Stance and the Guard is fairly Standard and sometimes even Hands down. Basically with Karate in Boxing you would Count as type of Counterpunching Out-Boxer with a Standard or Hands down Guard which uses a bladed Pendulum step. This is found more often in Soviet Style Boring. That's why it boggles my mind when Mike Tyson said once that he uses Karate in Boxing because he never looked anything like a Karate Fighter.
Sugar Ray Robinson was that rare complete complete fighter and the greatest fighter p for p that ever lived, he could out box out slug and knock you out with either hand. and could probably beat any mma fighter, that's right I said it and I stand by what I say.
Robinson just spammed kidney punches
Sugar Ray was one of the best boxers, if not the best boxer, to do it.
But making the mma claim is just ignorant and you know it. Saying shit like that doesn’t do anything to further his legacy, it just sets up an argument that need not take place.
The best fighters of any given combat sport are the best within their specific ruleset. Robinson is 100% optimally trained for boxing, 0% trained for kicks, takedowns and grappling. It’s not a difficult concept.
@@fivefootfive9671, None the less I still stand by what I said. SRR was a hybrid of a fighter/boxer/ puncher / slugger, who could adapt to any style or form of fighting, in his era as well as the 80's and 90's era boxing was real fighting, unfortunately it's not like that anymore, boxing has become a boring sport to watch.
@fivefootfive9671 I practically agree with you but somewhat can't help think that the further you go back in the past, some boxers would probably put up a better fight against mma fighters than the modern ones now. This is because if I recall correctly, back then, some boxers had wrestling experience or wrestled to some extent as part of their strength training. Please give insight if you think I'm wrong. P.S. Funnily enough, Terrence Crawfard, if he learned how to check kicks, could probably challenge an mma fighter with some legitimate confidence due to his wrestling experience.
@@clintonhouston1048You can stand by what you say and _still be wrong,_ which you are.
Any examples of successful boxers who are Switch Hitters?
Marvin Hagler, Terrence Crawford
Naseem Hamed and Jaron Ennis also
Mike tyson sort of
Crawford and Iron Mike. Iron Mikes shuffle step or whatever its called would have him shift to south paw to gain a better angle for lead hooks n stuff. He just did it so fast people didn't even notice the subtle shift in stance even after they got nailed.
Carlos Monzon is either a boxer puncher or complete fighter same with Ricardo Lopez.
Tyson doesn’t actually like to fight on the inside, he’s a mid-range counterpunching pressure fighter. From what I know Holyfield beat him by taking the fight there
I’m the slugger yup
Oscar De La Hoya is prime example of a boxer puncher
Pressure fighter is just Julio Cesar Chavez in a nutshell.
Canelo Álvarez could be a good example of a Slugger
W Video
💪🏼💪🏼
So Floyd is a boxer puncher too
Ben Whitaker is Boxer puncher
Vun er able
Hahahahaha
Everybody is the comments giving their opinion like they experts and ain’t never competed a day in they life 😂
what fighting style has the best tool set to go with in a fight
You mean for yourself? If yes, you have to figure it out by yourself or get the help of your Coach, everyone has his individual style and attributes. For example, you can't be a slugger with no punching Power
you should compare the attributes in the video to your body, and no you dont NEED to pick one, you could be a mix, most people have a little of mix in their styles
Ain't Hagler a switch boxer? I remember Hagler trapped Hearns into rope with switch stance. I also remember Pirog KOed Jacobs with a switch step. Oh and Fury iirc. Are switch boxer really that common?
Yes hagler is one of the best switch hitters ever. There arent that many who use both stances and even the most that do, arent equally good in both stances
Craw is also the last one
boxer puncher ✊
Duran complete one
Manny?
Out boxeer style
Would have enjoyed this vid if you'd narrated it yourself, rather than an AI voice.
what is pacman style here?
Pressure fighter I think
Roach let him adapt the mexican style of boxing but added the technical style in the process
LETSSS GOO CHAMP
So what is Pacquiao
Pressure fighter
What about GGG ? Brawler ?
Brawler is like sluggee
GGG is pressure
Why u did not mention manny he atleast in the list he represent boxing shame u did not give credit wat a shame
I also didnt mention Sugar Ray Robinson (probably one of, if not the best boxer p4p ever). But the video is not about greatness bro ✌🏼
@@IMUSUMI ok bro
@@levifranco3641 but if he would be in here, in which boxing style category would you put him in?
You forgot southpaw style
That’s a stance, this one explains the types of boxers fighting styles of how they wanna get into the fight.
@@Regular338Lapua
Southpaw is also a style mate
Obviously it’s a stance but they box differently
Ah yes complete figghters
These AI robot voices are getting sooooo crazy. Thought this was a real person for a minute. Hate robot voices in videos.
Kooom
Aren’t pressure fighters just swarmers???
Marvin hagler for example is someone who does a lot of pressure but I woulnd't call him a swarmer
@@IMUSUMI Can you do a more in depth explanation here between them? Because I’ve always known swarmers and sluggers are seperate but I though both would be considered pressure fighters due to their aggression and constant movement forward
The difference between Swarmers and Pressure fighter.
Pressure fighters aren't supposed to be short, they can be any height and reach. Their targets is to pressureise you and corner you. And attack you with hooks and uppercuts. They also uses jab in low quantity for inserting dominance. They need stamina because they don't backup they always will hit you and would throw more punches on score card so they can win even in decision vice.
Swarmers are similar, they also need high stamina. But they are supposed to be short. Their main target is to get inside you. The don't use the same extreme pressure that Pressure fighters use. They also posses extreme head moments so they can escape jabs from taller fighters. Soon as they get inside the fighter they throw uppercut and hooks tremendously and knock you out.
An example for Pressure fighter is Manny Pacquiao and Julio Chavez
An example for Swarmer is not Mike Tyson, he's a Counter puncher. It's Joe Frazier and Rocky Marciano.
@@StoogesTheTwo Pressure fighters push forwards but they generally don't go on the inside, Ken Norton was a pressure fighter, yet he still kept distance.
Swarmers push forwards but they DO get on the inside, they get close and like to bury their man under a barage of punches, Doug Jones is a good example.
Basically, swarmers like to be inside and throw alot of punches, whilst pressure fighters like to back their man up and force a mistake to capitalise on. Is how I would put it
@@wavethatcrashed9155thank you! I didn’t even realize you had responded to me
*Promosm*
this text to speech is real horrible. Just read it yourself
Thank You I will in the future. Watch the last minute of my recent video, I dont know if my speech is good enough
Awesome video