Whoa! $1300 for THAT?! The DPA 4018 mic Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ย. 2024
  • A comparison of the DPA d:dictate 4018 / mmp-b combo with the Sennheiser mkh 416 microphones.
    For Home studio equipment options check out kit.co/mikedelg...
    There you'll find options for home studio setups at a variety of different budgets.
    Help me make more videos by becoming a patron on Patreon
    / boothjunkie
    For my videos:
    My main camera:geni.us/bj-a6400
    My small camera: geni.us/RWNNVxO (Amazon)
    Links to amazon and kit.com may include affiliate codes in which I earn a small commission on products you purchase. . Thanks!

ความคิดเห็น • 108

  • @Kragatar
    @Kragatar 6 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    You're a mic and audio equipment guy who has both mic and audio in his name. It's like you were born to do this.

  • @carljenkins7354
    @carljenkins7354 6 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    The MHK sounds like a great microphone.
    The DPA sounds like there is no microphone.
    Morepheus was a badass.
    Neo was the One.
    There is no spoon.

    • @MrDeeb8
      @MrDeeb8 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow

    • @AdamBA380
      @AdamBA380 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The last five years of my life have all been leading to this moment… the moment where I encountered this comment

  • @ghstudios8967
    @ghstudios8967 6 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Just incase anyone cares, This is the microphone used in Stranger Things Season 2, The Young Pope, and Spiderman Homecoming

    • @NamFlow
      @NamFlow 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      and Game of Thrones.

    • @HenryTheBoilermaker3rdYear
      @HenryTheBoilermaker3rdYear 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      hOW YOU GUYS KNOW?

    • @semilumi
      @semilumi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@HenryTheBoilermaker3rdYear I would guess that perhaps G&H Studios lended the mic in question to Mike...?

    • @HenryTheBoilermaker3rdYear
      @HenryTheBoilermaker3rdYear 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@semilumi if that is the case then they would have send it to podcastage first because he's a great mic reviewer. Unless he doesn't live close to the studio.

    • @semilumi
      @semilumi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HenryTheBoilermaker3rdYear Ok. I don't know the relationships of these people, or if G&H Studios are also friends with Podcastage. I just assumed G&H Studios was the friend Mike is refering to in the video, and also sound engineer on the TV shows mentioned and not affiliated with DPA. I am also assuming the purpose of lending the gear for tests is not commercial interest but proffesional interest or "fun". :)

  • @MrDeeb8
    @MrDeeb8 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's so clear. It's just.. it's like I'm right next to you with the universe providing a slight bass boost

  • @nathanksimpson
    @nathanksimpson 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    High end boost might also be useful for if it is inside a blimp with a fuzzy cover on it. Fuzzy covers and blimps filter high frequency so it may primarily be there simply to compensate for blimps and maintain its "ruler flat" frequency response. As a VO artist you probably don't have to concern yourself with blimps since most of your work is done in a booth, but it's something sound engineers have to consider, and a high end boost could save them extra post production work.

  • @DapperDanLovesYou
    @DapperDanLovesYou 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    It still costs less than a u87. And I quite like its sound, on your voice in your booth!

  • @kirbymurdstone4925
    @kirbymurdstone4925 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    DPA got their start making test microphones (they were known as B&K back then). Ruler flat response, and very wide frequency response, and no noise, (literally, their noise floor is only a couple db above the theoretical limit). They have taken that knowledge and are now producing microphones for recording and live production. These are the most accurate mics you can buy, and you pay dearly for that. I like how they work with your voice, But honestly I'm not sure it is worth the cost over the Sennheiser.

    • @Podcastage
      @Podcastage 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Kirby Murdstone fascinating. I had never heard of DPA or B&K. I’ll have to look into this! Thanks for sharing the info.

  • @kevinkirkman9309
    @kevinkirkman9309 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That DPA is smooooth.

  • @distortingjack
    @distortingjack 7 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Pay attention to the sibilance. The Sennie sounds slightly metallic and harsh. The DPA sounds exactly like a person pronouncing an S in front of you.

    • @michaelsi6770
      @michaelsi6770 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      DPA is more boomy and muddy, 416 is much more clear. 416 is just a better mic even tho it might seem sibilant, 416 just might seem sibilant at a times but it is never sibilant.

    • @distortingjack
      @distortingjack 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The 416 has less low end because it has a high-pass cut built-in. What you describe as clarity is a lower treble boost.

    • @TechReflex
      @TechReflex 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@distortingjack Yeah that's what I noticed too, but MKH has a presence boost, so it's not necessarily a result of it being lower in quality. DPA does sound better though, it kind of sounds clearer even though it has less presence.

  • @AlexeyFilippenkoPlummet
    @AlexeyFilippenkoPlummet 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Well, DPA 4018 sounds uncomparably better than the Sennheiser one in my ears. Much more crisp and harmonics full sound.

  • @KatherinesBrain
    @KatherinesBrain 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In videography, a lot of people shoot in "Flat" settings so they can color the videos the way they like. Love that there are mic's that do the same thing.

  • @Thermolizer
    @Thermolizer 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The DPA sounds like pure gold!

  • @djs5089
    @djs5089 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The last inch usually is the most expensive...

    • @AskAW
      @AskAW 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's what she said...

  • @ronnyschmidt7641
    @ronnyschmidt7641 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Greatings from Germany! It is a MKH 416, not MHK ... I'm using a MKH 415. The only difference is the kind of Powering. My 415 is powered by 12V "Tonaderspeisung" and it sounds like in 1961 ...

  • @MichaelW.1980
    @MichaelW.1980 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I find the DPA 4018 to sound ridiculously good. This would be my end All be All microphone. That is, if I had that amount of money to spend.

  • @blazingdan
    @blazingdan 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Awesome as always, I like the sound of the DPA, though I couldn’t afford that. :) FYI, E100s is in MassDrop again today. If I wasn’t so worried about their QC issues I’d pick one up.

  • @EmilKleinGearAndBeer
    @EmilKleinGearAndBeer 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm with you , mate. Everything we change in a microphone, if it's got high pass or low pass it will be heard in the headphones not on TH-cam! It's like describing a beer or wine! Only if you taste it, right!

  • @mkho0505
    @mkho0505 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review. I'm debating between these two mics.
    The MKH 416 has the sound our ears are used to hearing. But to me the 4018 has more 'definition'.
    Would've liked to hear more comparisons between the two at a slightly further distance.
    Thanks for the useful video.

  • @Yourvideossuck247
    @Yourvideossuck247 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    great video Mike

  • @stuartcarson9378
    @stuartcarson9378 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Keep it.

  • @D.Bunker
    @D.Bunker 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Without headphones on - the DPA sounds way better than the 416. Even though it may be "flat", your voice has more low end on it.

  • @zaim_ipek
    @zaim_ipek 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The high-end on the 416 has always been unpleasant to me. I think it was ok back when we were recording to tape, and it helped vocals push forward, but with modern recording equipment, it just seems out of date.

  • @Phegmore
    @Phegmore 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I use my Audio Technica AT875R shotgun for onsite recording producing my short films. Nowadays, it's also my VO mic, because my AT2020 is out on loan. I'm liking your MHK 416.

  • @justiceartscollective7387
    @justiceartscollective7387 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Mike, love your voice and it sounds fantastic on the mkh416 and it sounds like a dream on the 4018. I'm wondering what you thought after hearing your own video. The 4018 sounds clearly more clear and I'm wondering why you're not using it regularly now.... I mean I know it's expensive but this is your profession. I might be likely to sell some of the others and buy this...

  • @effwww
    @effwww 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Yes, DPA 4018 is one of the best choices for indoor mic. When compare them, we should be comparing Schoeps CMC 461 and Sennheiser's MKH-50

    • @SoundSpeeds
      @SoundSpeeds 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      effwww You sound like someone that, like me, works in sound for motion picture. The Schoeps CMC-641 and Sennheiser MKH-50 are definitely two mics Mike should try. I only had the DPA to send him though.

    • @effwww
      @effwww 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      He should try out Schoeps CMIT5u vs 416 vs 4017 as well

    • @effwww
      @effwww 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I would like to watch the comparison between Schoeps and DPA. CMIT5u vs 4017 and CMC641 vs 4018

    • @effwww
      @effwww 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sound Speeds: I love great microphones.

    • @CzornyLisek
      @CzornyLisek 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or just buy 50cents microphone capsule that is equally "flat" ;P

  • @RezaMolavi
    @RezaMolavi 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    it sounds clear, gets out of the way and lets me hear your voice..........the difference is noticeable (I am listening with a very nice headphones)

  • @fabienleclercq4889
    @fabienleclercq4889 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for all your videos :) So useful for me even if in Korea most of that stuff is expensive as hell ^^

  • @effwww
    @effwww 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Are you going to compare Schoeps's CMIT5u vs Sennheiser's MKH-416?

  • @ActionHans
    @ActionHans 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's like the TLM 103 and the MKH had a baby. Amazing!

  • @Michael_Bialik
    @Michael_Bialik 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    d:dicate is actually spelled the same as "dedicate", not "d... dictate" :D

  • @rzeka
    @rzeka 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think it sounds great

  • @MrLucasErler
    @MrLucasErler 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    try the : Schoeps CMIT 5U ... i own it ( for my boom )
    it's velvet ... no silk for the ears. ... in my opinion.
    DPA are the first choise for LavMics. best sound out there. ... but this is just my opinion 🤔
    by the way ... i like the simple style of your presentations.
    keep going🍀

    • @annekedebruyn7797
      @annekedebruyn7797 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can confirm.
      Schoeps on the boom, DPA underneath the clothes.
      The blue color of the Schoeps has actually been a help on a few chromakey shoots.

  • @GunnarsFilmTips
    @GunnarsFilmTips 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome as always :)! I cant wait for your Rode ntg shotgun review :)

  • @simonnordberg162
    @simonnordberg162 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hmm... I recently watched a video by a production sound mixer where you got mentioned. I bet it's his microphone! ;)
    I've actually used the sibling to the DPA4018, DPA4017b short shotgun, a bit and it's really nice. It did however have some trouble with one female voice with sharp "S"s.
    Great video as always! Keep it up!

    • @SoundSpeeds
      @SoundSpeeds 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Simon Nordberg I sent him the mic and I'm a boom operator. The DPA 4017B is my favorite microphone! Amazing reach and off axis rejection for such a light mic. I use it on location work for my TH-cam channel. DPA mics are awesome!

    • @simonnordberg162
      @simonnordberg162 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I knew it was you! I thought you where mixing, sorry about that. It's great to see you guys helping each other out. Subbed to you both. :)

    • @SoundSpeeds
      @SoundSpeeds 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Mike was very helpful to me when I was researching to start my channel (that started months ago). After watching his videos for a few months, I reached out. He's a really good guy and I'm very appreciative to what he offers on his channel.

  • @kuglepen64
    @kuglepen64 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That DPA is DeLuxe. Makes my knees soft.

  • @ThickFreedom
    @ThickFreedom 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want it.

  • @scottchepko3859
    @scottchepko3859 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Like Butter...

  • @andyvarga7680
    @andyvarga7680 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i think the bass is uncomparably tighter, better and clearer for your voice - makes the Senny sound like cheap perfume! Un fortunately watching this damn video gonna cost me a small fortune - if I can find a dealer!

  • @dalesaudio
    @dalesaudio 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It would be extremely helpful to me (and others) to see you review mike stands/booms, and how to best arrange them for reading copy!
    Do you ever suspend any equipment from the ceiling?

  • @mikpineda
    @mikpineda 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    You sound like a advertisement narrator or someone in podcasts (nosleeppodcast) lol subscribing because of that. (Y) (Y)

  • @rikyriky966
    @rikyriky966 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    To be honest, there is a slight difference. Then it starts to get bigger and then it even get bigger. DPA 4018 captures sound and voice like a real hooman :)

  • @EdoDijkgraaf
    @EdoDijkgraaf 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thx!

  • @tomdeschamps5364
    @tomdeschamps5364 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you like your mkh416 you should test the sennheiser me64/me65/me66/me67 k6

  • @matthiaskrause1155
    @matthiaskrause1155 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Impressive!

  • @melodychest9020
    @melodychest9020 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's for post production.

  • @markntexas8265
    @markntexas8265 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You’re a celebrity to me Mike. Not sure that helps though

  • @xaosnox
    @xaosnox 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow. Great review! That thing is incredible. The 416 is so overrated. If I needed something tiny and couldn't afford a Sphere L22, I'd be seriously looking at the 4018. The DPA addresses everything I don't like about the 416. It has depth and detail that the 416 kills. If you can't hear a MAJOR difference, keep listening! But, since the Sphere can give me a hyper-cardioid pattern with the sound of an M49 or a Telefunken 215, I can't see scraping pennies for this one!

  • @kenedwards7625
    @kenedwards7625 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Mike: Great job as usual. I would be interested to hear what your have to say about the Mojave microphones specifically the MA 50, the MA 201 FET and the MA 200 tube.

    • @joeferreira99
      @joeferreira99 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      We hosted a DPA demo recently. I use Mojave MA 201 FETs for my drum overheads. They put two 4018s over the drums it completely blew away the Mojaves. You could almost mic the entire kit with two 4018s. The Mojaves sounded like AM Radio compared to the 4018s.

  • @scoremoore4280
    @scoremoore4280 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir amazing video again I was wondering if the mxl 990 would be good for Voice over?

  • @infinitesound8
    @infinitesound8 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its possible to use DPA 4018 for business interviews when there is 2 people talking and not to be in the middle of camera shooting but catch the quality? I love low freq but I need it into a lavalier to be more easy to manipulate....Great video and voice btw! Thanks

  • @bale2935
    @bale2935 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    that sound i believe it's from the MHK 416 not the DPA
    5:01
    i think you mess that up
    and back to DPA at 5:11

  • @DRail1990
    @DRail1990 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dpa vs neumann please please im fixing to purchase the dpa but really want it compared to the neumann. May have an re320 i would be willing to send you if you needed it for comparisons.

  • @imark7777777
    @imark7777777 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:18 so I'm watching the video and I get this time and.... yeah this was before 2020.
    I then go down to the upload date: congratulations.
    And great it sounds like I want one ;_(

  • @xenesy4472
    @xenesy4472 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I believe Schoeps cmc4 with mk41 capsule will win over the DPA.

  • @sulfurhomeo
    @sulfurhomeo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello, is this combo a good option for table recording when doing webinars? If yes, is there any table stand for this combo?

  • @Nico7780
    @Nico7780 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Did you ever come across the aston microphone's line ? I'll be curious to know how they sound on your voice

  • @tomwilson3069
    @tomwilson3069 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you review the cad e-200 microphone? I see some for sale at a decent price but I don't know much about it compared to the e-100 or e-100s.

  • @deszczak
    @deszczak 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    in the video there is MHK instead of MKH

  • @steve_seguin
    @steve_seguin 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I bet it kills you a bit inside to have a typo in your video @1:40
    it happens to the best of us

  • @EU_DHD
    @EU_DHD 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Get one.
    Please keep talking into it.
    I never understood ASMR until now.

  • @simonnordberg162
    @simonnordberg162 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Btw. If you want to check out some other hi end microphones, go to www.schoeps.de/showroom/. They've got this interactive showroom where you can listen to many of their microphones with different sound sources from different distances.

  • @Crushercorp
    @Crushercorp 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wish you could test some high end gaming headset mics, like sennheiser Gamer zero, would be interesting to hear the difference in mic quality using your voice.

  • @adri.s
    @adri.s 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    just say...wow! my care are more ceap of this mic!lol
    do you know oktava micrphone? what do you think?

  • @timjenkins8943
    @timjenkins8943 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I got the Schoeps miniCMIT recently over DPA 4017b/18. What are your thoughts on CMIT vs 4017b?

    • @JoDeluk
      @JoDeluk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm struggling with that very same decision. How would you recommand your miniCMIT?

    • @timjenkins8943
      @timjenkins8943 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@JoDeluk Love the miniCMIT for compact size and outstanding sound capture. still amazed by it almost a year later.

    • @JoDeluk
      @JoDeluk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@timjenkins8943 just placed the order ;-)

    • @timjenkins8943
      @timjenkins8943 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JoDeluk congrats. I only wish I bought it sooner. Get it close and on a boom and it's just a pleasure to listen to recordings. I am using zoom f6

  • @dragonstone6594
    @dragonstone6594 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They sound the same here.

  • @tadhgmcgrath1409
    @tadhgmcgrath1409 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    for youtube content, there is virtually no impressable difference between these two. the fidelity is not high enough

  • @ElindorBG
    @ElindorBG 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes, it does sound good, but so as most of the 200$ microphones ... does it worth the price? not even one bit ...

  • @annekedebruyn7797
    @annekedebruyn7797 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The way it sounds 1300 seems like nothing.

  • @Mikkel111
    @Mikkel111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The MHK 416 sounds dull and boring - It almost sounds like a headset-mic compared to the 4018.

  • @repalmore
    @repalmore 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Celebrity spit?? TMI! ;o)

  • @modvind
    @modvind 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There's just nothing compared to DPA mics.

  • @AskAW
    @AskAW 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I been telling my wife about that last inch for years...

  • @MrDeeb8
    @MrDeeb8 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    What

  • @danielmaier960
    @danielmaier960 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Notif squad

  • @sinkronize
    @sinkronize 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man, that name “mhk” u have used in the video makes me really wanna click the dislike button. I wont do it but come on, concentrate a bit when ur stepping in the review territory, people care about this stuff.. u even made other ppl call it mhk in the comments, haha. Its “mkh 416”. Cheers!

  • @kipling1957
    @kipling1957 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You need to study your topic (and actually look closely at the frequency response in the spec sheet) before you put up these reviews. Regarding the HF boost switch being a boost above 5kHz? The frequency response actually ramps up gradually by about 5dB from about 2KHz-8kHz where it peaks, then rolls off again. Duh! - you actually supplied us with the graph where this is self-evident. Also, a lot of what you talk about would be 101 for most people watching this kind of overview of a high-end mic. I think we know about the utility of presence boost and bass roll-off. The money, as it were, is in how good is off-axis colouration, side rejection, self-noise and the general timbre of the mic. Such things can be demonstrated, which is what one would hope for in this. Quote: "I don't have a lot of information". Well, we heard your voice through the mic, so that's a plus at least. The rest could be gleaned from inspecting the DPA spec sheet. So I must agree with your self-assessment. Thanks anyway.

  • @farpelito1287
    @farpelito1287 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got bored waiting for him to get to the point.