I also think the right-most proof is easier looking and better for this specific proof, but the left-most one is more appropriate since we're dealing with circles, especially if we try to also prove fro,m the same drawing that
A better question might be to ask "what can we learn from each proof and what are the different strategies?": so much of proof writing and problem solving is about building a toolkit of techniques that one has found to be successful when applied to previous, similar, problems. Asking which one is "better" suggests that one of them is in some way less valid than the other, and I don't think that's particularly useful. I do enjoy these geometry videos :)
Who did it better?
I also think the right-most proof is easier looking and better for this specific proof, but the left-most one is more appropriate since we're dealing with circles, especially if we try to also prove fro,m the same drawing that
How those two triangles get congruent because AAA is not a rule to congruent a triangle with another triangle
SIMILAR NOT CONGURENT !!
one reason as to why I believe Rachael's may seem better is her lines don't intersect each other and this may give it a more straight forward effect.
Absolutely. It's much more aesthetically pleasing!
Both methods are perfect and easy
You are genius 🤓
Actually, Rachael's proof felt slightly easier to me...
I definitely agree
thanks I would prefer the the right one
A better question might be to ask "what can we learn from each proof and what are the different strategies?": so much of proof writing and problem solving is about building a toolkit of techniques that one has found to be successful when applied to previous, similar, problems. Asking which one is "better" suggests that one of them is in some way less valid than the other, and I don't think that's particularly useful. I do enjoy these geometry videos :)
The word "Better" could also imply which method is easier to do in this case