You are correct, this is not a conlang. This is a relex of English. Your "translated" sentence is just a word for word replacement of the English equivalent, which effectively makes this a very insecure cipher. What motivates the complete inversion of the plosive and fricative series? Grimm's Law posits that voiceless plosives in Proto-Indo-European shifted manner of articulation to fricatives, but that occurred in early Proto-Germanic, before the West/North/East splits. The Index Diachronica has recorded exactly zero instances of a shift from /k/→ /ɹ/ (or any other rhotic, for that matter), or from /ɹ/ to /k/, or from /r/ to /ʃ/, all of which are possible explanations for your derivation of . These are sound changes that simply do not occur diachronically. If your derivation is simply reversing the order of the contemporary English word, it is slightly more understandable (if still not the most realistic derivational process). Additionally, I have never heard the term "adecib" used in an formal linguistic context, and google seems similarly confused. I am glad to see newcomers to conlanging, though, and I wish you the best in your future conlang endeavors.
I apologize for the confusion. I would also change the order of the word by arranging the vowels alphabetically and arranging the consonants reverse alphabetically, hence the name ''Adecib'' which implies this sort of order. The reason you couldn't find anything on google is because I made the whole thing up. (Obviously not that the words come from English) but I did make up the name too. Anyways, I'm glad this video grabbed your attention, because you had so much to say, but next time I make a video on this language, I will include this rule.
@@theofficeroliviersamson4498 This is a very interesting way to derive words! I think "adecib" makes a lot more sense as a name once you know your derivational rules. Good luck!
I like the design of this video! As another commenter has pointed out, you're correct that it's not a conlang - it's a cypher. I'm curious of the reasons you've made this? Is it just a play around? I do hope to see more stuff, especially if you have a shot at a real conlang at any point! :)
Well I did kinda make a conlang that I might talk about in a future video, but also in the video I forgot to mention how and “Adecib” really works, which is actually why I gave it that name, because I ordered the vowels alphabetically, and opposite order for consonants.
Well, I wanted to make a language similar to dhe way the germanik languages have evolved. I mostly made this outside of home, so I didn't really put in dhat mutc work in to it.
I would love to see this so many writing systems are fitted to the languages they reperwsent you should totally make your own interpretation of the Latin alphabet for esennwwic
You are correct, this is not a conlang. This is a relex of English. Your "translated" sentence is just a word for word replacement of the English equivalent, which effectively makes this a very insecure cipher. What motivates the complete inversion of the plosive and fricative series? Grimm's Law posits that voiceless plosives in Proto-Indo-European shifted manner of articulation to fricatives, but that occurred in early Proto-Germanic, before the West/North/East splits. The Index Diachronica has recorded exactly zero instances of a shift from /k/→ /ɹ/ (or any other rhotic, for that matter), or from /ɹ/ to /k/, or from /r/ to /ʃ/, all of which are possible explanations for your derivation of . These are sound changes that simply do not occur diachronically. If your derivation is simply reversing the order of the contemporary English word, it is slightly more understandable (if still not the most realistic derivational process). Additionally, I have never heard the term "adecib" used in an formal linguistic context, and google seems similarly confused. I am glad to see newcomers to conlanging, though, and I wish you the best in your future conlang endeavors.
I apologize for the confusion. I would also change the order of the word by arranging the vowels alphabetically and arranging the consonants reverse alphabetically, hence the name ''Adecib'' which implies this sort of order. The reason you couldn't find anything on google is because I made the whole thing up. (Obviously not that the words come from English) but I did make up the name too. Anyways, I'm glad this video grabbed your attention, because you had so much to say, but next time I make a video on this language, I will include this rule.
@@theofficeroliviersamson4498 This is a very interesting way to derive words! I think "adecib" makes a lot more sense as a name once you know your derivational rules. Good luck!
I like the design of this video! As another commenter has pointed out, you're correct that it's not a conlang - it's a cypher. I'm curious of the reasons you've made this? Is it just a play around?
I do hope to see more stuff, especially if you have a shot at a real conlang at any point! :)
Well I did kinda make a conlang that I might talk about in a future video, but also in the video I forgot to mention how and “Adecib” really works, which is actually why I gave it that name, because I ordered the vowels alphabetically, and opposite order for consonants.
Well, I wanted to make a language similar to dhe way the germanik languages have evolved. I mostly made this outside of home, so I didn't really put in dhat mutc work in to it.
tis broder hassen make his own dialect
You should do a transforming alphabet of your own language 🔥🔥🔥🗣️🗣️🗣️
thanks for subbing to the new channel!
@@theofficeroliviersamson4498 np
I would love to see this so many writing systems are fitted to the languages they reperwsent you should totally make your own interpretation of the Latin alphabet for esennwwic
@@joshjocuns4076 I do love making scripts…
BRO, So difficult 😭
the language?
@@theofficeroliviersamson4498 yes, it'd be really hard to remember all the changes
@@Negreb25 Well if you know the IPA it's really easy because the plosives just turn into fricatives. And vice versa.
@@theofficeroliviersamson4498 🤔🧐