A Masterpiece // CANON RF 24-105 F2.8

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ย. 2024
  • A Masterpiece // CANON RF 24-105 F2.8
    Canon slowly adds up their RF Lens Lineup.
    The newest addition is the RF 24-105 with an aperture of 2.8.
    This lens was designed for filmmakers and photographers and thus has some
    unique features such as declicked aperture, parfocal and many more.
    My Gear Rental:
    ▶ www.steadyrent...
    Check my LUT PACKS:
    ▶ elopage.com/s/...
    ▶ My Cameras:
    Main Camera: amzn.to/3n6I4De
    2nd Camera: amzn.to/3ozn2gQ
    old Camera: amzn.to/3mWNLUd
    ▶ Best Drone: amzn.to/33Xbdcu
    ▶ Stabilizer:
    Best Stabilizer: amzn.to/3gv3QxR
    Best Gimbal: amzn.to/3n2h3ko
    ▶ Audio Gear:
    Studio Microphone: amzn.to/3n1VnVj
    Best Run & Gun Mic: amzn.to/370fxJM
    ▶ Lights:
    Favorite Light: amzn.to/3gGQj6N
    Best Budget Option: amzn.to/2IvOixo
    ▶ Lenses:
    My favorite lens: amzn.to/39SWrr2
    Run & Gun Lens: amzn.to/33XDLCR
    My favorite wide angle: amzn.to/2VZezaG
    ▶ Favorite Music Sites:
    Get 2 Months free for Artlist: bit.ly/artlistxpp
    Get 1 Month free for Epidemic Sound: bit.ly/epdporter
    Get Audiio Lifetime Subscription: bit.ly/audiioX...
    ▶ Stock Footage
    bit.ly/artgridxpp
    **All the links above are affiliate links. If you buy an item using one of the links I'll get a reward. However the price won't change for you if you use these links.**
    Instagram: www.instagram....
    Facebook: / steadyfilmde
    Website: www.steadyfilm.de
    #rf24105

ความคิดเห็น • 77

  • @pauleporterdp
    @pauleporterdp  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I tested if and how the lens works on my RED.
    Quickly checking if the lens is parfocal and if the aperture can stepless be adjusted.
    See here in this 60 sec. short:
    th-cam.com/users/shortsoMJLISX2SUw

  • @dr.nathaliepruschenk7256
    @dr.nathaliepruschenk7256 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Wow this is really the one Lens. Thanks for the great video

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You’re welcome :)

  • @TylerEdwards
    @TylerEdwards 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great video! This lens looks amazing. Merry Christmas dude!

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks Tyler, wishing you as well:)

  • @ManuelGoicolea
    @ManuelGoicolea 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Looks really great! Thanks for the video!

  • @Chris.Wheelington
    @Chris.Wheelington หลายเดือนก่อน

    Absolutely agree with you nor other. This lens is a dream come true. Perfect for run and gun. Thank you for an another quality video.

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you Chris I’m glad that you like it ☺️

  • @adamssanchez1272
    @adamssanchez1272 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I wish you had more subscribers/views, your production value is on par or better with big photography channels

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks mate I really appreciate that. Yes at some point we will get there :)

  • @frankfeng2701
    @frankfeng2701 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This lens makes more sense on R5c, which ironically is the only RF full-frame cinema camera with autofocus.
    There is just no native RF super35 zoom lens with AF or IS, e.g. 16-55 f/2.8, like you'd find on Sony E-mount.

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes that’s true. Thanks for watching :)

  • @jonathanrice4181
    @jonathanrice4181 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Thanks for the content! I’m getting impatient, waiting for mine to ship! 😊

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Keep my fingers crossed that it arrives before Christmas :)

  • @bukococonut
    @bukococonut 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks🎉

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for watching :)

  • @whiterock1865
    @whiterock1865 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Just to clarify, it’s electronically parfocal and some people showing that show that there was a little bit of lag if you’re doing rapid, but in real world most people don’t do whip zooms where it would be an issue

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I did a quick test on my Red :
      th-cam.com/users/shortsoMJLISX2SUw?si=j00X89o-x6ZhzTa_

  • @christopherjahn8559
    @christopherjahn8559 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What a great Lens, would also love to use it :)

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching :)

  • @kennonfleisher
    @kennonfleisher หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Anyone ever tell you that you look like Ben Affleck? Hahah great review on this.

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ha ha no one ever told me this 😅 thanks

  • @sa.t.2507
    @sa.t.2507 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I can’t decide between this lens or 28-70 F2 from Canon. I have the Sigma 24-70 Art now and it is great also.

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      True this is a great lens. I think with 105 from canon you have a bit more flexibility and the 4mm on the wide end do make a difference

    • @learnphotographyskills5032
      @learnphotographyskills5032 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pauleporterdp The 24-105 doesn't impress me. It's a weird shape lens with a robotic zoom but it isn't a big enough zoom range that you'd ever really need a robotic zoom. 10x zoom with a robotic zoom ok... 4x robotic? What is the point? Most people can zoom 4x by hand. So.. my opinion, the design is bad because of the zoom and the end result is not worth it so much.

    • @sa.t.2507
      @sa.t.2507 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pauleporterdpwould you say that this lens has any character or is it neutral and clean?

    • @ER-gn8io
      @ER-gn8io หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@learnphotographyskills5032 Endlich einer der diesen Schmarrn kritisiert! Hier bietet Canon zwei Power Zoom Adapter an. Die einfache Version ohne den zusätzlichen Stecker kostet knapp 1000€ und die mit Stecker kostet dann fast 1500€. Damit kann man den Zoom mit einer Kabelfernbedienung betätigen! Wegen diesem Firlefanz ist das Objektiv so lang und schwer geworden! Die Gewindebohrungen am Objektivkörper sind nicht abgedeckt!

  • @SoundItOutFilms
    @SoundItOutFilms 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hey! Thanks for the video. According to RED, the lens corrections won't be applied in-camera the way they are by default on Canon cameras. Do you see dramatic barrel distortion on the RED at the wide end compared to the C70?

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks mate, I’ve watched a ton of your videos to the C70 😊
      I honestly tested the lens most of the time with the c70.
      I did shoot some stuff on the Red as well and haven’t noticed any barrel distortion. ☺️

    • @SoundItOutFilms
      @SoundItOutFilms 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nice. @@pauleporterdp I'm working on a video about the lens corrections right now. At 24mm in photos in Lightroom when you toggle them on and off it's DRAMATIC. You lose quite a bit of field of view with the corrections enabled, but it kills all the vignetting and distortion. The C70 doesn't seem to have a way to disable them, and ironically the Red doesn't have a way to enable them.

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ok that’s crazy.
      I only had the lens for a week and a project at the other Side of the country.
      I took the lens with me and shot the project with it.
      I would have preferred to spent more time and do more tests with it 😊 so I’m looking forward to your in depth tests 😎

  • @pauleporterdp
    @pauleporterdp  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for watching :)

  • @JeremyLevis
    @JeremyLevis 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’m tempted, but I suspect I’ll need something wider as well due to the crop.

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching and I agree on crop sensors it’s not the best for wide angles

    • @wcsdiaries
      @wcsdiaries 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@pauleporterdpcan it be used on a gimbal with c70?

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I used it on a Glidecam without any issues. I assume on a gimbal you would need a counterweight

    • @wcsdiaries
      @wcsdiaries 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@pauleporterdp which glidecam you use?

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      HD 4000

  • @Alexratson
    @Alexratson 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for the review! I am looking to pick one of these up fresh in the new year for use on my C70. Did you feel the need to use any lens support with it?

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching. At first I thought so but then I felt pretty comfortable without.

  • @_Chris390
    @_Chris390 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Do Canon mirrorless cameras still have that weird issue when shooting video that makes the footage look wobbly, especially in the corners? Like the whole image plane is shifting around. I think it must be a stabilisation issue. I noticed it in a few of the DPReview videos.

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching. Yes this an issue with the canon cameras that have a stabilised sensor

    • @_Chris390
      @_Chris390 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That is a shame as they have the most interesting first-party lenses@@pauleporterdp

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes I totally agree hopefully 🤞

  • @codythep
    @codythep 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for the video, mate! From the US. Question for you: Did you try balancing it on a gimbal? I shoot weddings primarily on a gimbal with an R6.
    Wondering why no reviews show it on gimbals, if it is not allowed pre release date. Thanks again!

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for watching.
      So I balanced it on my Glidecam easily.
      I don’t use gimbals so that’s why.
      But if you use an R6 I assume you will have to counterweight it on the back of the camera since the r6 is soo lightweight.
      On the c70 with a v Mount our oven bp 60 battery it was pretty balanced already

    • @codythep
      @codythep 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank you very much for the detailed response@@pauleporterdp

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You’re welcome

  • @mavs8888
    @mavs8888 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If I may ask... I'm most interested in the cameracage you use for your Canon C70.... würdest du es mir verraten? :) Danke!

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Gerne, ich nutze den von 8Sinn.
      Den von Tilta kann ich nicht empfehlen da ist der Cage nach 2 Wochen gebrochen.

    • @mavs8888
      @mavs8888 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@pauleporterdp danke! Ich werde mal suchen (und finden haha) Frohe Feiertage!

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Danke, wünsche ich ebenfalls

  • @baekmedier
    @baekmedier 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Its not really a 24mm on the C70…
    We need a Canon c500 mark 3 with RF Mount and 4K 120fps to sit behind the lens 😂👌

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s true it is meant for full Frame yes 🙌🏻

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching

    • @baekmedier
      @baekmedier 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      great video :D awesome lens.. filming on the C70, R5C and the R3 my self... problem is:
      - C70 needs speedbooster.. then its not RF anymore.. and without, its a crop sensor makes the 24-105 a 38 mm. - 168mm lens..
      - R5C needs ND filter adaptor behind the lens (build in) and that makes it EF s well.. Canon almost had it right..
      - R3 is full frame but not cinema menu, and nu build in ND.. and really its a photo camera for me.
      Canon PLS let 2024 be the year that they make a no compromise C500 mark 3 that has:
      4K 120
      Full frame
      RF mount
      Build in ND
      Opengate recording
      @@pauleporterdp

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes I understand the issue ☺️

  • @doug_EX
    @doug_EX 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don't understand why they didn't do a 16-70 or something similar for Super 35 sensors. Canon has only one cinema camera that is full frame and this 24-105 is definitely for a full frame camera.

  • @jdpst20
    @jdpst20 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I've been a huge fan of the 24-105 focal length for a while... I've owned both EF versions and the RF version for my R5c and while I did love it and IMO F4 was still plenty good and for it's size it was the perfect all around lens. The 2.8 version just is way over prices and massive for just 1 more stop of light IMO. I loved the F4 because even used RF version is $850-900 for such a versatile walk around lens it's the do it all. I could not even imagine walking around town with this thing, or hiking with it. It's specifically a Hybrid cinema / photo lens mainly for smaller productions. I actually just recently sold the 24-105 and replaced it with the 14-35 F4 and the 70-200 F4. They cover more focal length for not much more room in the bag.

    • @davidmorefield
      @davidmorefield 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah definitely not a hiking lens. But could be extremely useful for more production focused gigs.

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for your feedback ☺️ and I agree it can get heavy especially if you have other lenses that do mostly the same with less weight

    • @JMurph2015
      @JMurph2015 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The 24-105 F4 "L" has the worst IQ of any lens in Canon's L lineup right now though, and afaik it's not by a small margin. I'm curious if this one is sharper than the 24-70 f/2.8 or not. The 24-70 has only been "ok it's a good lens", nothing magical in my experience. If this lens brought prime-like sharpness to the 24-105 range, then that would be really killer.

  • @ianhodgsonphoto_video
    @ianhodgsonphoto_video 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The problem is Canon only has one camera that uses the full potential of this lens (R5c). Untill they bring out a pro full frame cinema camera with RF mount it is not worth the money for me.

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching.
      Yes this is true. I’m already excited what will come in canons cinema lineup.

    • @pickleydoo
      @pickleydoo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I love the R5 C 😍

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great camera for sure

  • @joliver4083
    @joliver4083 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    For me, the real masterpiece: Tamron and Samyang 35-150mm F2-2.8 ❤️

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching

    • @SneakyCaleb
      @SneakyCaleb 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, I prefer those especially at that price point

    • @joliver4083
      @joliver4083 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@SneakyCalebthe focal range is more useable for events + 1 stop brighter at wider end. With Canon 24-105 2.8 price, you can buy 1 fullframe mirrorless body + samyang 35-150.

  • @typorosz
    @typorosz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just tested this lens for about 2 days. It is not a too sharp lens, the 24-70 EF version is much much sharper than this: th-cam.com/video/It7ZYYkW42g/w-d-xo.html

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When I had the lens there was an update available for many RF Cameras which enabled them to fully support this lens did you install this?

  • @user-sh8op2ku3c
    @user-sh8op2ku3c 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Here the Russians are going to achieve movie effects with simple lenses, this lens is too expensive for me, in my city you will not see the price for it, you can hang on it and arrange a podium

    • @pauleporterdp
      @pauleporterdp  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Ha ha thanks for your feedback. And I agree I like lenses with character especially my Helios 44 😍

    • @user-sh8op2ku3c
      @user-sh8op2ku3c 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's where I started taking photos, but Russians have other priorities today