53:02 What the hell are you driving at? I know. Shut up. Blast you. I have reasons Amplius. Adhuc. Iterum. Postea. Are you condemned to do this? ...aw, buddy
To reflect how Stephen lost his way in the conversation, by focusing instead on his inner monologue; it therefore takes him a while to regain his conversational stability. It, I think, also represents (and more importantly): Stephens's attitude towards them: that they are all saying the same thing, their speech is coalesced as ineffectual intellectualism - with no poignant musings.
I like how this immense, enthralling piece of literature is summarized so briefly-yet-comprehensively by the casual description
Thank you so much for this, I would never have managed to read the novel without these wonderful voices
Very refreshing to listen to this.I find the stream of consciousness stuff much more enjoyable to hear than to read.
I waited this long to find this representation of mythical and current voices. Agenbite of inwit.
After hearing this, I realized that the whole novel is meant to be told.
53:02
What the hell are you driving at?
I know. Shut up. Blast you. I have reasons
Amplius. Adhuc. Iterum. Postea.
Are you condemned to do this?
...aw, buddy
1:02:27
Just a placeholder for myself.
38:09 - (191) Louis…
6:45
18:48
This is presented as one paragraph in the novel. Why? It's impossible to clearly distinguish the dialogue between characters.
To reflect how Stephen lost his way in the conversation, by focusing instead on his inner monologue; it therefore takes him a while to regain his conversational stability. It, I think, also represents (and more importantly): Stephens's attitude towards them: that they are all saying the same thing, their speech is coalesced as ineffectual intellectualism - with no poignant musings.
14:16
4:17
13:21
18:06
39:54
19:45
46:21
1:03:33
40:00
39:17
46:36