Lawyers Share Funny Court Arguments (Lawyer Stories r/AskReddit)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.ย. 2019
  • ▶ Want to watch more amazing Reddit stories? Check out our playlist! • Uploads from Updoot St...
    ▶ Fresh AskReddit Stories: Lawyers of reddit, whats the most ridiculous argument you've heard in court? 🔥 2nd channel with exclusive Reddit stories!
    / @updooteverything
    Join Our Discord: / discord
    --
    Music provided under Creative Commons license from Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
    creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 140

  • @Drakenborn
    @Drakenborn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +186

    I seriously had to listen to "implied consent for a certain amount of abuse/violence" about four times because my brain was having difficulty processing that amount of stupid all at once.

    • @Queenofdragons6
      @Queenofdragons6 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yeah, that...that was messed up.

    • @LJCyrus1
      @LJCyrus1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I think that actually used to be a thing not all that long ago.
      It seems insane, but people actually thought that was acceptable.

    • @markh.6687
      @markh.6687 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The stupid....it's over 9,000!!

  • @gene4438
    @gene4438 4 ปีที่แล้ว +203

    Someone bragging about driving a Prius is almost as annoying as someone bragging about being vegan.

    • @deinogreenstreet8631
      @deinogreenstreet8631 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      yeah, even if your doing a good thing for the planet, please don't rub it in other's faces
      I know someone with a Prius, and someone who's vegan, and it annoys both of them when someone shoves it into other's faces that they're vegan

    • @ReformedCatfish
      @ReformedCatfish 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      *lmao even though you asked not a single time, i am vegan and have a prius i am better than you cause i save the world by just eating plants which still doesn't help and driving some random car!*

    • @joemccusker1830
      @joemccusker1830 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@deinogreenstreet8631 The Prius is also very polluting to make because the minerals for the batteries are mined in Canada, shipped to China to be made into batteries, then the batteries are shipped to Japan to be put into the cars, and then the cars are shipped all over the world.

    • @kaydenvandeyar9963
      @kaydenvandeyar9963 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joemccusker1830 da 00

    • @MitchellTF
      @MitchellTF 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Joe! I remember an Adam ruins everything on that. Also she confused environment and personal responsibilities...

  • @riakun
    @riakun 4 ปีที่แล้ว +117

    Not sure if this counts, but I was on jury duty, and this old man (I'm taking about 85-90 years old) was suing a man for hitting his car. Fair enough. Whiplash sucks at the best of times, but especially when you're pretty old.
    But that's not the reason why. Its because the old man couldn't have sex with his wife anymore because he couldn't get it up after the accident. No real injuries. Minor damage to the car (could easily be buffed out). Just that reason.
    I nearly laughed aloud at this, and the lawyer caught my eye and knew.
    I could have very easily gotten into trouble for this, but instead, I was dismissed from jury duty. Still makes me chuckle 3 years later.

    • @zerotodona1495
      @zerotodona1495 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      riakun I mean, it’s possible if he had a spinal injury cause if nerves.

    • @benjaminwertz2379
      @benjaminwertz2379 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      So, the best way to get out of jury duty is to laugh in court

    • @recklessrex
      @recklessrex ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@benjaminwertz2379 one of the best ways. They're gonna get rid of anyone that shows any likelihood for outbursts as quickly as possible, because if that person accidentally blurts out something can affect impartiality, it could poison the entire jury pool. In addition to suddenly laughing, some other things that will get you dismissed quickly (hopefully without getting you in trouble) include
      - acting pissed off to be there (but be respectful, don't put yourself in contempt)
      - trembling and stammering when asked to speak (legit happened to me my first jury duty, I was so nervous to talk to the judge, he just told me I could go lol)
      -fidgeting constantly
      -silently glaring at defendants side of the courtroom
      - sighing/rolling eyes a lot

    • @kevinsundelin8639
      @kevinsundelin8639 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That actually sucks, if you still have a sex life at 90, that's pretty commendable

  • @tylertheultimatebadass87
    @tylertheultimatebadass87 4 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    3:35 - Funny thing is, Jesus very specifically said to pay your taxes, so that's not even a bad defense, it's just outright invalid.

    • @arianebolt1575
      @arianebolt1575 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Among other things, the hatred of paying taxes and desire to escape them transcends time and space

    • @xxxx-qo9dh
      @xxxx-qo9dh หลายเดือนก่อน

      O M G!

  • @jaycooper2812
    @jaycooper2812 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I once watched a trial where the defendant was accused of armed robbery. The bank teller was on the stand testifying that she knew that it was the defendant who robbed the bank. When asked how she knew it was him she replied that the holdup note was written on the back of paperwork he had received from his probation officer and also when he fled the bank he had crashed into her car in parking lot leaving his bumper behind with his liscence plate still attached.

  • @MitchellTF
    @MitchellTF 4 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    ...that Dred Scott decision thing is actually clever. As Dred Scott was never technically overturned...but superseded by the fourteenth amendment. Were I a judge and he didn’t listen? I would point out that he could theoretically get a WORSE punishment if he went with that.

    • @MothmanOfficialWva
      @MothmanOfficialWva 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You almost have to respect the guy for the sheer gall to use that argument.
      Keyword: almost.

  • @Jaythebamf
    @Jaythebamf 4 ปีที่แล้ว +159

    I swear half these cases sound like Ace Attorney ones

    • @subjectdelta7210
      @subjectdelta7210 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The RetroAlpaca 725 OBJECTION! They are ace attorney story’s! Probably see some of them in the next game

    • @an8strengthkobold360
      @an8strengthkobold360 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A little less ummmm...
      Nintendo approved.

    • @NeostormXLMAX
      @NeostormXLMAX 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      lmao at the yeast converting to alcohol lmao

    • @ishaankhurana8956
      @ishaankhurana8956 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@subjectdelta7210 overruled thus is inaccurate

    • @RichMcc
      @RichMcc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As per most reddit storys . Based on tv shows/films that ppl share as their own to gain Internet credits

  • @panagea2007
    @panagea2007 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    13:11 When I was a store detective, many shoplifters claimed they "didn't realize" they left without paying. I'd just say, "That's ok, I didn't realize I was going to arrest you."

    • @metarcee2483
      @metarcee2483 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Store detective is the coolest job title for anything retail related.

  • @Brievel
    @Brievel 4 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    6:43 The attitude that someone deserves to be hit because they're "running their mouth" is not an uncommon one. He probably did expect the judge to be sympathetic.

    • @akriegguardsman
      @akriegguardsman 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What does running her mouth mean ?

    • @Brievel
      @Brievel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@akriegguardsman Talking a lot. In this context, saying things he didn't want to hear.

    • @alextrill5829
      @alextrill5829 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, what was wrong in that case is man hitting a woman.
      But I definitely can sympathize to someone punch someone who can't shut up.

    • @Brievel
      @Brievel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@alextrill5829 It's a common excuse used by abusers when the victim I'd trying to stand up for themselves. Even a single sentence can be "running her mouth" if the abuser doesn't like what she's saying.

    • @alextrill5829
      @alextrill5829 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Brievel as I said, hitting woman is wrong.
      Or are we gonna say anyone who's a victim of abuse can qualify as a "man"?

  • @gurglequeen433
    @gurglequeen433 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Guy actually wanted his lawyer to ask for money that his wife got, because she was locked in a Nazi death camp. That man has balls, I'll give him that. I'd like to imagine the tongue lashing the judge would give then for that request.

    • @JoshSweetvale
      @JoshSweetvale 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I believe this is the old meaning of Chutzpah

    • @markh.6687
      @markh.6687 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That the lawyer refused to even present such an argument gives me some small hope for the legal profession.

  • @henrydickerson9776
    @henrydickerson9776 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I'm actually kinda interested in that mattress.

  • @tonyblake7569
    @tonyblake7569 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    3:20 I'm guessing the old lady figured if she successfully sued herself then her homeowner's insurance would pay and not her so really she was suing her insurance company. Main issue with that is it could easily be argued since she knew she didn't salt it she intentionally hurt herself and that's insurance fraud.

    • @Reggie2000
      @Reggie2000 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I've never seen someone sue themselves, but people quite often sue a relative who has insurance. Like mom suing son or vice versa, but only because they are insured.
      It's legally sound imo

    • @tonyblake7569
      @tonyblake7569 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Reggie2000 I remember one where this lady sued her nephew over something small but she got hurt. People called her an AH because he was like 9 and ran up to hug her, knocked her down on accident, and she broke her wrist. Turned out she didn't actually want to sue him but even if she lost that was the only way to get her own insurance to pay. Kinda like stories where a family member takes someone's car and wrecks it. And the only way their insurance will cover it is if there's a police report.

    • @Reggie2000
      @Reggie2000 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tonyblake7569 Exactly. There was an ep of Malcolm in the Middle that had this plot. And some reality star was suing their kid for a fall at their house, but they of course had insurance.
      I'll bet there are a thousand cases per year like this.

  • @taylorwiseman8078
    @taylorwiseman8078 4 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    13:06 Am I the only one who wanted to high-five that lawyer and punch the husband?

    • @katelynking4978
      @katelynking4978 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Taylor Wiseman Read that and was like “Holy F*ck, the gall.”

  • @OptimusPhillip
    @OptimusPhillip 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit!

  • @aarondavidson907
    @aarondavidson907 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    7:40 that's actually a creative one lmao

  • @icemanwild40
    @icemanwild40 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Why in the hell is there ad about mattresses on this video. I'm dead.

  • @qr6422
    @qr6422 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Everyone just saying Chewbacca defense that dose not make sense

    • @Ajehy
      @Ajehy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Q R - its a reference to a South Park episode. A “Chewbacca defense” is any time when a lawyer tries to confuse the jury instead of actually making arguments against their opponents.
      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chewbacca_defense

  • @Hfisvsuzhdkcgcgsixhdnc
    @Hfisvsuzhdkcgcgsixhdnc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dad is a judge, he had a guy argue that he didn't have to pay his rent because he had to pay his TV subscriptions first.

  • @LessaCaira
    @LessaCaira 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The one with the married couple not fricking. The lawyer was saying he was trying to stop what she was saying but she was answering the question. Never, ever ask a witness, either during deposition or on the stand, a question you don't know the answer to or that you don't want an answer to. She was asked how they could know certain things about her sex life and she told them. In great detail. Perfect! Her lawyer should have been happy because I guarantee the other side did not bring that dumb ass line of questioning up during the trial.
    You question the validity of the case, I get it cause it's your job. But I hate questions like these. That and "What were you wearing?" asked to rape/molestation victims. Just UGH!

  • @markh.6687
    @markh.6687 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've seen lawyers dig holes for themselves so deep and fast in court I wonder if they still have their law licenses.

  • @BobbySliko
    @BobbySliko 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The Chewbacca defense

  • @jeremyhancock1964
    @jeremyhancock1964 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Unverified, but I heard of a case where a man who was married to a woman tried to sue his male lover for ruining his marriage when the wife found out because 'he knows I can't resist him'

    • @markh.6687
      @markh.6687 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Reminds me of Groucho Marx's line in court: "I plead insanity; I'm crazy about her!"

  • @hillbillydeluxe27
    @hillbillydeluxe27 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Most ridiculous arguments by attorneys?? ANYTHING by alina hobbit. I mean, literally ANYTHING.

  • @amuk3
    @amuk3 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I once had to spend several minutes arguing against the assertion by opposing counsel that "and/or" was solely disjunctive.

    • @markh.6687
      @markh.6687 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The ironic part is lawyers use it all the time in documents, then want to argue about its meaning, even though they know damned well what it means.

  • @jaycooper2812
    @jaycooper2812 ปีที่แล้ว

    I once beat a ticket for running a red light in front of a cop. The judge asked me why I didn't stop and my reply was that I was trying to get my passengers arm from around my neck and didn't see the light change. The judge said seriously? I then handed him a copy of the police report for the robbery and the medical records for the 62 stitches from the 3 stab wounds I was treated for. The cop arrested the robber and as I was being treated at the hospital wrote me the ticket for a stop light violation. The cop's rationale was that I should have slammed the brakes as soon as the robber tried anything, which is hard to think about when someone has an arm around your neck and is trying to cut your throat. From then on I carried a. 357 revolver in the driver's door map pocket of my taxi. 6 years later that revolver saved my life during another robbery where the robber shot me from behind. I was able to unlatch the driver's door and reach my gun as I fell from the car. The robbery then got out of the back seat and fired 14 more bullets in my direction. I fired 1 shot which incapacitated the robber. I still have 1 of the bullets in my shoulder as it would have done more harm to remove it than it did to leave it in place. The robber tried to sue me for shooting him and the judge told him to pound sand. He is in prison until the year 2042 and is having a hard time dealing with prison as the one shot I fired defending myself paralyzed him from the waist down so he is in a wheelchair now. The last words the judge said to me was to aim 8 inches higher next time so she didn't have to waste any more time in her court room.

  • @Queenofdragons6
    @Queenofdragons6 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    12:17 That is a hilarious idea.

  • @nayeli03
    @nayeli03 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    My ex would just say "because/cuz" as a reason for an argument 🤦‍♀️✨

    • @10devongard
      @10devongard 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Sounds like my mom

    • @lunatheluma3804
      @lunatheluma3804 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That is both my mom and sister and it pisses me off to no end
      I am the type of person who needs a good reason for doing things
      I also need evidence for belief so that's why I'm an atheist :/

    • @nayeli03
      @nayeli03 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lunatheluma3804 dude I feel you!! When I have an argument, be prepared. Cuz I have evidence, reasoning, and all

  • @DiamondYoshi101
    @DiamondYoshi101 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Basically get a good lawyer.

  • @glasstumble1677
    @glasstumble1677 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0:44 - 1:09 sounds like the cobra effect

  • @jamesdawson5509
    @jamesdawson5509 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anything that comes out of the mouth of a Sovereign Citizen.

  • @PrincessNinja007
    @PrincessNinja007 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As far as the light thing, sometimes when you're heading west, the sun behind you hits stoplights at just the right angle that you can't tell which one is lit

    • @markh.6687
      @markh.6687 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The newer angled lenses make it hard to see the lights during the day, regardless of lighting. I've got a local intersection with lights like that, and you almost have to get to the signal to see what color is lit up.

  • @MadameSomnambule
    @MadameSomnambule 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So many facepalm worthy defences

  • @mannydavis7708
    @mannydavis7708 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Chewbacca is a Wookie . . .

  • @michaelmapes4119
    @michaelmapes4119 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    13: 48 - A jury trial for shoplifting ?!?

  • @wrestlerjayred
    @wrestlerjayred 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wow dred scott?!? thats wild

  • @alextrill5829
    @alextrill5829 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "Lawyer said there was a special circle of hell for lawyers who ask for something like that." - translates into "The people will hate me, so I'll refuse, but that's really the only reason."
    Implying lawyers have ethical or moral concerns, or aren't going to hell is preposterous.

    • @flyingdutchman8371
      @flyingdutchman8371 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      For the most part I agree, but you are being a little bit narrow sighted by not remembering that there are lawyers who frequently have, are currently, and will in the future, defend people from things like unlawful arrest/being framed/being extorted etc. etc. Not all lawyers are good, but not all are bad, because if they were, well, society would completely collapse as all lawyers would allow everyone to be sued for anything in order to get their paycheck, but that isn't the case entirely.

    • @HarmonyEdge
      @HarmonyEdge 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I hear it as "I'm going to hell, but I'm not going to get my eternal punishment amped up to that level."

  • @connortripp99
    @connortripp99 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Chewbacca Defense.

  • @gendawg4584
    @gendawg4584 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Surprise Party Defence 🎉

  • @InternetinaNutshellChannel
    @InternetinaNutshellChannel 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You can handle the truth!

    • @shittyname2657
      @shittyname2657 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      DON'T TELL ME WHAT I CAN HANDLE!

    • @DiamondYoshi101
      @DiamondYoshi101 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      BUT I'M WEARING OVEN MITTS

    • @markh.6687
      @markh.6687 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Reality is often disappointing."

  • @josephtaub20
    @josephtaub20 ปีที่แล้ว

    In a murder case the defense argued that the State couldn't prove the knife with the victim's blood on it was his client's because it had not been fingerprinted or tested for the client's DNA (when you DNA a sample, it shows up every marker present, so testing the blood proving it was the victim's would have shown an admixture with the client's DNA, but had't. Basically, that the State had failed to prove the murder knife was his client's. It was found in the client's pocket.

  • @michaelreilly6874
    @michaelreilly6874 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    These make the Chewbacca Defense look sane

  • @avelus5984
    @avelus5984 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Disclaimer: Not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.
    To anyone who didn't understand why the Surprise Party Defense didn't work:
    What if = "In this case where the ex-wife is there with her son and the order of protection, what happens if..."
    Therefore, by even saying those two words, he acknowledges that the order exists, which therefore means that he is guilty of stalking her, since if he weren't, he wouldn't be thinking of a scenario where the order has been granted in the first place. Innocence means that the guilty scenario is not going to happen EVER, so again, he destroyed it by creating this hypothetical situation where the order has been granted.
    But because the guy was dumb, he didn't think about the possibility of what he says having a hidden meaning, and thus thought that "what if" meant that he was creating a possible scenario where the order wouldn't be valid, which, if his logic worked, meant that it would be invalidated completely.
    However, as you can see, by even doing that, it's impossible not to acknowledge that the order exists, otherwise there would be no "what if" scenario to begin with. This took me a while to figure out.
    Lesson: Leave ALL of the talking to your lawyer unless you are asked by the judge or your lawyer to answer.
    Don't try thinking of a "brilliant idea" because said "brilliant ideas" 100% of the time have a meaning you are not aware of that is going to screw you over. Your lawyer is a professional who knows perfectly well how to avoid that trap and defend you at the same time, so RELY ON THEM!

  • @Nonya943
    @Nonya943 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I bet that dude who raped his daughter got the shit beaten out of him in jail. He probably got raped tenfold too. They don’t appreciate kiddy fiddlers in jail.

  • @SaintAbsol
    @SaintAbsol 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Not gonna lie, I’m kind of on the side of the lottery ticket guy.

    • @babyedits2004
      @babyedits2004 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Theft is theft. He stole $300 worth of tickets, even if it's not likely they'd be winners.

    • @Vertraic
      @Vertraic 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@babyedits2004 Actually might have a case if he could show that the FULL ROLL , that is 30-300 tickets, did not have a single dollar worth of prizes on it... Of course that case would be AGAINST the lottery rather than FOR himself, but...

  • @michaelbutler1619
    @michaelbutler1619 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    4:43-4:49 Dude, if you wanted to run away, all you had to do was keep it a secret! It's not that hard!

  • @GamingPigeon812
    @GamingPigeon812 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    12:06 Surprise Party Defense
    Can anyone explain how he admitted to stalking the ex wife, I can’t seem to piece it together from that one sentence.

    • @Nyanx4
      @Nyanx4 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Probably not a verbatum quote. His comment was more than likely longer, but the poster had to remember it and type it out.

    • @thehiddenninja3428
      @thehiddenninja3428 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Claiming that he's not a stalker was literally none of his defense. He's not saying the protective order doesn't have reason to exist.
      He's saying he wants the order lessened.

  • @user-ic6wh8fu8f
    @user-ic6wh8fu8f 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ima HOBO

  • @robertaylor9218
    @robertaylor9218 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The dred scott one blind sided me. Wow. Dark and funny as hell.

    • @markh.6687
      @markh.6687 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The case of citing a since-overturned precedent trying to make an argument out of a molehill.

    • @robertaylor9218
      @robertaylor9218 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@markh.6687 it has never been overturned. It just became irrelevant because of constitutional amendments and cultural shifts. That’s why I was citing it.

    • @markh.6687
      @markh.6687 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robertaylor9218 It was overturned by the Amendment, instead of by the Court. I suppose I could have said "nullified" or "overriden" under Congress's power to pass laws which nullify/override SCOTUS rulings, but that's even more complex.

  • @csnide6702
    @csnide6702 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    one I saw.... A man who was injured in a war was involved in a lawsuit with a landlord that did not have his apartments up to code for handicap accessibility yet rented to to the man with the "promise" to make the upgrades . he never did and Veteran quit paying Rent and was evicted . When asked by Judge why he didn't pay Rent he answered that the code violations had not been fixed and since he was handicapped he was on a fixed income and couldn't afford more than basic necessities. The Judge ruled they were two different things and he would have to get confirmation from SS and DoD to confirm his hadicapped status. the Lawyer came up to the man and said " grab me around the neck " the man did & lawyer picked him up and placed him on Judge's desk and said " your honor- THE MAN HAS NO LEGS" . Upon seeing this the Judge said " point taken " then ruled in the Veterans favor !

  • @damenwhelan3236
    @damenwhelan3236 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How to get out of a ticket.
    (As long as you're not an asshole)
    "Sorry officer. Here are my details"
    "Dis you know how fast you where going?"
    "No. I don't."
    "Where you drinking today"
    "No I wasnt".
    "Sir, you wjere traveling at 15 over the limit. Any reason to be going so fast?"
    (In the morning)
    I'm sorry I was distracted about my meeting later. I'm actually glad you stopped me. If I'm this distracted I should pay better attention. Thank you. (TAKE THE TICKET)
    (At night)
    Sorry I've had a long day. (Everything today is listed)
    I'm glad you stopped me if I'm that distracted I didn't notice my speed. Thank you. (TAKE THE tikcket).
    Cop won't remember you. So when you say this to the judge and the judge asked the cop (if they shpw) if that's true and the cops "i don't recall judge. Sounds about right though" the judge will moat likly dismiss it.
    Also. Book lessons/driving refresher for the court. This shows a sincere effort to improve in an area you acknowledge needs improving. Also likely to have the ticket dismissed.

  • @littlevivigaming4822
    @littlevivigaming4822 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder how many people try the Chewbacca Defense. Legal Eagle said it happens more than one would think but I’ve never heard any stories like it outside the South Park episode he was analyzing

    • @happynotredamefan3736
      @happynotredamefan3736 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      legal eagle isn’t a real lawyer just pretends to be

    • @littlevivigaming4822
      @littlevivigaming4822 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@happynotredamefan3736 do you have any evidence to back up that assertion?

  • @pauldavisjr.3284
    @pauldavisjr.3284 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Damn! I've heard people blame shit on their dog but statutory rape. WOW!

  • @wildrook
    @wildrook 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "I'm having a lot of trouble sleeping on my mattress."
    Her lawyer: (puts a bag over his head)
    Judge: ...
    Opposing Lawyer: AND IN THOSE FEET IN ANCIENT TIMES...

  • @user-hc7qb6zy5x
    @user-hc7qb6zy5x 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yea i dont Unterstand the Context but i know that it has something to do with Joe.

  • @imperiumcommentingnetwork4677
    @imperiumcommentingnetwork4677 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3:42 not all Christians are like that, only the very new ones, or some of the ones that don't read their Bibles and listen to prosperity preachers

    • @saphiriathebluedragonknight375
      @saphiriathebluedragonknight375 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      If they had read their Bibles then they'd know that Jesus said to give to man what is man's and to God what is God's. In other words, to pay your taxes and fines.

  • @blademonkey2606
    @blademonkey2606 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow

  • @whatsanenigma
    @whatsanenigma 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    ⚖️⚖️⚖️⚖️⚖️

  • @askhowiknow5527
    @askhowiknow5527 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    A country cannot be a reasonable person lol

    • @daraghokane4236
      @daraghokane4236 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Legal person doesn't mean a biological man

  • @absolboi334
    @absolboi334 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lol it’s Larry

  • @0error.389
    @0error.389 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    piss

  • @daigreatcoat44
    @daigreatcoat44 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Why is the text read by someone who clearly doesn't understand his script? Is this AI ?

  • @jamegumb7298
    @jamegumb7298 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The professors, well if she got the money during the marriage, shared property, correct?
    Women out here getting full support of lawyers and tv show hosts for wanting lottery money well after they left/divorced the guy for a sidepiece they take it to court. I bet if genders were reversed it would be a different story.
    Also the cancer patient not getting cash because dying anyway, technically true and logical but she still had more time left, and perhaps could have survived cancer (depending upon what stage and all).

  • @mlgtakeo4065
    @mlgtakeo4065 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    UwU im a idiot

  • @helpmereach10kwithoutvideo77
    @helpmereach10kwithoutvideo77 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    2nd

  • @larry548
    @larry548 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    First View

  • @larry548
    @larry548 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    First Comment

  • @davidleonard9724
    @davidleonard9724 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dog one is gonna

  • @Dcenteio
    @Dcenteio 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There is no such thing as a Jehovah’s Witness compound. He made that up.

  • @koopaking6148
    @koopaking6148 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jesus died to pay for all sins... Which is a spiritual payment for a debt we are unable to pay on our own and unfortunately does not cover physical debts, fines or taxes which we are responsible for paying for by ourselves...

  • @zestycitrus5346
    @zestycitrus5346 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    O hey larry

  • @nayeli03
    @nayeli03 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    My ex would just say "because/cuz" as a reason for an argument 🤦‍♀️✨

  • @zombiestriker5793
    @zombiestriker5793 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    2nd