Men ata yurta kalan türklerdenim. Özbek türkuyum. Kandaşlarima selam olsun Özbekistan'dan 🇺🇿 Men ota yurtda qolgan turklardanman. Ōzbek turkiman. Qondoşlarimga salom bōlsin Ōzbekistondan 🇹🇷
Greetings to all my Turkic brothers from Bashkir. We are all Turks: from the Crimea to Altai, from Sakha to Cyprus - the Turkic lands. We are all one big family, we all speak the Turkic language. I hope, I believe, I pray that the Turkic World will flourish and gain strength. The Turks of the whole world will unite in a powerful union. Glory to Allah that we are uniting and making friends, despite all the problems and provocations. As they say: water wears away a stone. Sooner or later we will be united. I believe in it. Long live our Nation! We are descendants of great people. We decorate this World. We are this World. 🇹🇷🇦🇿🇰🇿🇰🇬🇺🇿🇹🇲 + other brothers 🐺☪️
First of all, you need to get a very good education and read a lot. Then we need to get stronger economically. You also need to be mentally strong. If we do not educate ourselves, there may be well-educated and financially powerful organizations that want to use such a great power. Believe me, these are not well-intentioned. Study hard like the Israelites and read a lot of books.
@@werapeeverythingthatmove6266 That's not true. Turks did not marry other races.Their appearance has changed due to geography. I hope you understand it.
@@werapeeverythingthatmove6266 ahahaha,idiot. we did not interfere with the Arabs. Arab lands were in the hands of the Ottomans. but the Turks lived in Anatolia and the Arabs in the Middle East. In the dna tests conducted, no arabic dna was found in the Turks. Turks mixed with the Byzantine Roman peoples in Anatolia. but despite this, we have a central Asian DNA ranging from 5% to 45%. don't talk in the ass without knowing anything.
The term Turkic represents a broad ethno-linguistic group of peoples including existing societies such as Altai, Azerbaijanis, Balkars, Bashkirs, Chuvashes, Crimean Karaites, Gagauz, Karachays, Karakalpaks, Kazakhs, Khakas, Krymchaks, Kyrgyz people, Nogais, Qashqai, Tatars, Turkmens, Turkish people, Tuvans, Uyghurs, Uzbeks, and Yakuts and as well as ancient and medieval states such as Dingling, Bulgars, Alat, Basmyl, Onogurs, Shatuo, Chuban, Göktürks, Oghuz Turks, Kankalis, Khazars, Khiljis, Kipchaks, Kumans, Karluks, Bahri Mamluks, Ottoman Turks, Seljuk Turks, Tiele, Timurids, Turgeshes, Yenisei Kirghiz, and Huns, Tuoba, and Xiongnu.[24][25][26][27][28]
Tureg'in ilk kralına Buman adı verildi. Buman Moğolca bir kelimedir. Moğolcada sonsuz demektir. Tureg, diğer birçok Moğol kralı tarafından yönetildi. örneğin tulan kralı, sintine kralı, tengri kralı, baimei kralı, ijan kralı vb. İlk kral Moğol iken Türklerin hüküm sürdüğü doğru değil. Türkçe konuşan ve yazan Tatarlar Moğollarla bir arada yaşadılar ama Türklerin hepsi bir arada yaşamadı.
Tatarlar Cuman ve Kıpçaklarin birleşmiş ve Tatar dendi ve ayrıca çoğu Tatarın dili Kıpcakca Turgesh de adından belli Türk sen ve diğer Türk karşıtı kişilikler Geberin kabul etmeyip bizi dünyaya yeterince küçük gösteren ındo-european ve afro asiatic denen soytarı ırklar yüzünden Türklük artık efsane gibi birşey yeni çıkma falan çıktığı gibi yok olma bu ne?!!!! Tarih çocuk masalı değil istediğiniz gibi şekilenmez
Love them or hate them, you would be a fool for denying that they didn’t change history forever. Starting in Siberia and making it to as far as Anatolia is pretty impressive imo.
Only a fool would think Turk started from Siberia, the Turks were the slaaves of Mongols, who were the original inhabitant of the steppes, it is through the Mongols that Turkish influence spread to Central Asia and the Steppes first through trade. The Turds try to claim the history of all inhabitants of the Steppes as theirs, and in return the Koreans try to claim they are the original Turks, I do not know who should win the first price for historical liars, the Turks who claim the whole history of the steppes when it is not true or the Koreans who claim the history of everyone, including the Turks.
@@red4812 Turks are mongols are not totally different groups. Xiongu was fathers of both and even after seperation they didn't seperated totally. In big Turkic empires there were lots of Mongol tribes and similarly under Genghis Han there were a lot of Turkic tribes. i.e Golden horde considered more Turkic than Mongol. Also there are a lot of common names in both languages, Cengiz(Genghis), Kubilay(Kublai), Kutluk(Qutlugh), Ögeday(Ogeday), Paydar(Baidar) etc.
Hun (xiongnu) people were turks. Turks have founded Xiongnu (hun) empire, but mongols have joined the empire later times. On the other hand, golden horda empire was a union of turks and mongols. This empire was founded by mongols, then turks had got the power of menagement from mongols. Turks and mongols are totally differant races but they have made some unions and confederations because of their common enemies such as china and russia.
Ahmet Demir Austria-Hungary controlled almost all of Central Europe and balkans (which they took from the ottomans). The US is huge and basically it’s own continent, they had a lot of land outside of North America as well such as panama, Caribbean and the Phillipines not to mention it was one of the largest GDP’s and military in the world, Italy under Rome conquered almost all of Europe, Middle East and North Africa. France had almost all of west and North Africa as well as Indochina and much of North America, they also kicked the ottoman’s asses in WW1 and captured much of the Middle East. Napoleon also conquered almost all of Europe as well. Poland-Lithuania conquered the entirely of Eastern Europe from Scandinavia to the Black Sea. Greece ate the entire eastern half of the known world under Alexander the great in under a decade also they too captured much of turkey in the 20th century. Also the ottomans lost twice in Viena after getting their asses beaten by an outnumbered foe. The polish winged Hussars ate the entire ottoman army’s ass for lunch. Comment when you’ve actually won a world war and maybe even recognise the genocide of 3 million Armenians which were force marched into the desert to their death or pushed into the Black Sea to drown by the young Turk retards. It’s been a hundred years maybe you can finally apologise for it.
A Tunisian and a Turk were chatting. Tunisian belittled Atatürk and asked what did Atatürk achieve? and the Turk replied ; "I learned French because I wanted it, you learned it out of necessity.Now do you understand what he's accomplished? "
Seriously? Rising sun flag? No shame for your war of aggression? This is like Germans using the Swastika(which they don't as they feel shame for their actions and are good people).
@@KazakhBoy The Turkic people living in Altai mountains migrated to modern day America 30.000 years ago in the ice-age time using the bearing strait. This is well documented. If you look at the culture of native indians and the culture of Shamanic Turks you will see 99% simiralities
@@rylodimadperoksizko5129 evet çok iyiler çinliler hiç katliam yapmiyor Kardeş ne diyorsun çinliler onlara soykırım yapıyor, hapse atim işkence etip öldürüyorlar, türkistan türkler mücadele ediyor sen onların yerinde olsaydin dayanamazdın
Turks indeed had a decisive role in triggering historical major events like the Migration Period, Crusades, shaping the history of Balkans, Islamization of Northern India, Age of Discovery as well as ending the Middle Ages with the conquest of Constantinople, fall of the Roman Empire.
Tureg'in ilk kralına Buman adı verildi. Buman Moğolca bir kelimedir. Moğolcada sonsuz demektir. Tureg, diğer birçok Moğol kralı tarafından yönetildi. örneğin tulan kralı, sintine kralı, tengri kralı, baimei kralı, ijan kralı vb. İlk kral Moğol iken Türklerin hüküm sürdüğü doğru değil. Türkçe konuşan ve yazan Tatarlar Moğollarla bir arada yaşadılar ama Türklerin hepsi bir arada yaşamadı.
@@malikabd2902 first of all Seljuk was *RULED* by Turks from present day Turkmenistan, second more mongols are crying about xiongnu and Hunnic empire being Mongol then any other ethnic group
@@leratking8842 it was a turco Persian empire, the Seljuks had their capital in Isfahan Iran and we're as influenced by Persian culture as they were by turkic
@@malikabd2902 İran çoğunlukla Türk'tür. Selçuklu Türklerinin devamı Anadolu Selçuklu'dur. Anadolu Selçuklu da yıkılınca Türk komutanlar beyliklere ayrıldı. Osmanlı ise hepsini yeniden birleştirdi. Osmanlı Selçuklu Türklerinin devamıdır
Stop admiring genghis khan bi*ch because he is not a TÜRK and he is not our ancestor because he is a mongoli. PS: TURKIC and mongolic are diffrent lenguages races and cultures. And share not the same ancestors.
The reason that the Türks and other Turkic nomads were formidable warriors was that they were horse-archers. A horse-archer specifically denotes a mounted warrior armed with a bow who can shoot from horseback while riding. The Turkic nomadic warriors as well as the Mongols used the composite bow, which was made of horn, wood, and sinew. The composite bow was more accurate and had a better range and rate of fire than muskets and early firearms. The tactical principles of the Turkic horse-archers were based on the combination of fire power and mobility. yhe nomadic horse-archers shot in volleys, weakening the enemy before they charged. Ideally, they practiced "fire power in movement" like modern armies.Other things being equal, the horse-archers were often almost unbeatable on the open battlefields. Against them, sedentary soldiers were often helpless until the development of efficient battlefield handguns, including the repeating firearms (the firearms that could be fired repeatedly before being manually reloaded) in the seventeenth century.
i am a Greek and i believe in Turkish-Greek friendship , all the wars we had on the past doesnt matter shit to me, every leader in this period of time wanted a bigger empire , more food, more gold , more area, this is natural. Let's respect each other's origins, culture, borders. Greece and Turkey have a long history and we have a lot in common and a lot of differences. Let's all live in Peace. Peace & Love.
Thecool Inio yes also Turks came to Europe with Huns, later followed by Pechenegs, Cumans First Bulgarians they build empires in the region some of them allied with Roman empire some of the fought later they became a part of the Greek Byzantium empire and fought against Muslim Turks in 1071 lost their identity.
: Hungaryball : Thank you! Btw just a correction, you guys are our cousins not brothers. But still, you guys are a part of Uralic-Altaic family. So thanks :D Love Hungary from Turkey
theodoros kolokotronis the most powerful states of the world are the Turk states.göktürk empire,ottoman empire,seljuks empire,europa hun empire,hun empire,white hun empire,avar empire,aqqoyuns,mamelukes,east hun empire,west hun empire,asia hun empire,uyghur empire,mogol turk empire,golden horde empire,safevid empire the most powerful empires always founded Turks.We Turks like to read history but our main duty is to write history.
Theodoros Kolokotronis We recommend reading the kürşad, which attacked the chinese palace of 5000 people with 40 people and saved their relative.kürşad's china rescued from his palace brother established east gokturk state.your sources for kürşad's name is Chieh-she-shuai
@@alparslanosmangokturkoglu2366 olm niye fuck iran diyorsun. adamların iranla alıp veremedikşeri yokki. İranda hayet normal vatandas statusundeler. ayrıca oradaki azeri-türkmenler sever ve desteklerler devletlerini. muhalifleri de vardır da farsilerde de var o.
Baran Yalçın the Aegean Islands are pure Greek. No debate there. But seriously you need to get rid of Erdocunt, he is destroying you with propaganda and disrespecting the turkic culture. Greetings
Arda Baştürk I'm so glad you understand. I'm a Greek but we don't warn you guys because we want to destroy you. We are not saying that erdogan is destroying you as an enemy. We are saying that as neighbors who want peace. You need to get rid of him before he starts sending your families in prison. My fellow greetings
The first Turkic-speaking community appeared between 7,000 BC. and 5,000 BC. in South Central Asia (in today's Turkmenistan, near the Iranian border), namely Anav culture. Part of this community remained in this area until around 1,000 BC. while another part of the community around 4,000 BC. was distributed in the northern part of Central Asia and another part was distributed in regions such as Mesopotamia and Anatolia. The name of one of these communities in Anatolia and Mesopotamia was even called Turukku.
On the other hand, as has been recently pointed out, though the beginning of Bahri rule is usually dated to 1250, none of the first five sultans were, in fact, members of the Bahriyya. 32 The Arabic sources for the period refer to the dynasty as the dawlat al-atrak, dawlat al-turk, or al- dawla al-turkiyya (i.e. dynasty of the Turks), in recognition of the racial or ethnic group which predominated in the mamluk caste during this period, and to distinguish it from the Burji sultanate in which mamluks Northrup, L. (1998). The Bahrī Mamlūk sultanate, 1250-1390. In C. Petry (Ed.), The Cambridge History of Egypt (The Cambridge History of Egypt, pp. 242-289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521471374.011 The Mamlūks in Egypt and Syria: the Turkish Mamlūk sultanate (648-784/ 1250-1382) and the Circassian Mamlūk sultanate (784-923/1382-1517) amalia levanoni The Turkish era of the Mamlūk sultanate The Mamlūks’ rise to power: a decade of trial and error The Arabic term mamlūk literally means ‘owned’ or ‘slave’, and was used for the white Turkish slaves of pagan origins, purchased from Central Asia and the Eurasian steppes by Muslim rulers to serve as soldiers in their armies. Levanoni, A. (2010). The Mamlūks in Egypt and Syria: The Turkish Mamlūk sultanate (648-784/1250-1382) and the Circassian Mamlūk sultanate (784-923/1382-1517). In M. Fierro (Ed.), The New Cambridge History of Islam (The New Cambridge History of Islam, pp. 237-284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521839570.010 The term 'Mamluk Sultanate' is a modern historiographical term.[9] Arabic sources for the period of the Bahri, Mamluks refer to the dynasty as the State of the Turks (Arabic: دولة الاتراك, Dawlat al-Atrāk; دولة الترك, Dawlat al-Turk) or State of Turkey (الدولة التركية, al-Dawla al-Turkiyya).[16][17][9] In the obituary notices about Niẓām al-Mulk the fact that he drew his power and authority from the thousands of Turkish Mamlūks he possessed (kathrat mamālikihi; wa-malaka min ghilman al-Atrāk ulūfan) is clearly stated. See al-Athir, Ibn, al-Ta’rikh al-Bāhir fi al-Dawla(Cairo, 1963), p. 10;Google Scholar and Abū Shāma, who cites Nizām al-Mulk’s contemporary or near-contemporary, the historian Muhammad b. ‘Abd al-Malik al-Hamdānī, who died early in the sixth/twelfth century (Kitāb al-Rawdatayn,Cairo, 1288H, i, p. 26).Google ScholarFor more detail see “Aspects of the MamlⅫk phenomenon”, pp. 213-14. TheSiyāsat-nāma certainly reflects Nizām al-Mulk's personal attitude to the Turkish Mamlūks and the spirit of the time, even if it was edited after his death. When the ‘Abbāsid Caliphs were under Buwayhid suzerainty their Mamlūk policy was not free from the pressure of that Daylamite dynasty. The success of the Daylamite soldiers in so many eastern armies is really astounding, but in the slightly longer run they stood no chance against the Turkish Mamlūks, and they disappeared. Even a Buwayhid ruler preferred Turks over them (see e.g.Bosworth, , “Ghaznevid military organisation”, p. 42;Google ScholarAyalon, , “On the eunuchs…”, p. 109Google Scholar). 41 I have already pointed out, in “Egypt as a dominant factor …”, pp. 30-1Google Scholar, some of the reasons which prevented the Mamlüks from taking real root under the Fātimids. There I mentioned especially the fact that, on moving from the Maghrib to Egypt, much of their ruling and military systems had already been crystallized, and they could not replace, or at least replace properly, the already existing and most powerful military bodies. Another factor which I referred to there was the great distance separating Egypt from the Turkish Mamlüks” homeland, which was, in addition to that, cut off from Egypt by mainly Sunnite states hostile to the Fātimids. (The antagonism of the Seljuks to the acquisition of Turkish Mamlüks by the Sunnite al-Muqtafī must have been at least as strong in the case of the Fātimids. This, coupled with the much greater distance of Egypt from the sources of supply, illustrates well the obstacles which the Fātimids faced in forming a proper Mamlük army.) Yet another major factor was the very inadequate military schools of the Fātimids, when they had them (I discuss this aspect in my book on the eunuchs). The impossibility of the Mamlük system (with the Turkish Mamlüks at its heart) developing under the Fātimids as it should, was clearly demonstrated in the second half of the fourth/tenth century, as soon as its great protagonist al-'Aziz billāh died (386/996), that is to say, quite soon after their occupation of Egypt. That was one of the reasons why their hold on Syria was even then not strong enough. With the later appearance of the Seljuks and the Crusaders that hold, without a further military force, could not but become more precarious. Note also the military feats of the Turkish Mamlük contingent which Saladin sent in 568/1172-3 to the Maghrib (“Aspects of the Mamlük phenomenon”, part B, pp.12-13Google Scholar). 2. Kitāb Tarjamat thaghr Dimyāṭ al-maḥrūs wa-mā waqaʻa bihā min ʻahd Nūḥ ʻalayhi al-salām ilá ākhir dawlat al-Turk min Kitāb al-ʻAnāṣir li-majālis al-Malik al-Nāṣir : manuscript, [1567] ; Tarjamat thaghr Dimyāṭ al-maḥrūs wa-mā waqaʻa bihā min ʻahd Nūḥ ʻalayhi al-salām ilá ākhir dawlat al-Turk ; Thaghr Dimyāṭ al-maḥrūs wa-mā waqaʻa bihā min ʻahd Nūḥ ʻalayhi al-salām ilá ākhir dawlat al-Turk ; كتاب ترجمة ثغر دمياط المحروس وما وقع بها من عهد نوح عليه السلام الى آخر دولة الترك من كتاب العناصر لمجالس الملك الناصر : مخطوطة، [1567] ; ترجمة ثغر دمياط المحروس وما وقع بها من عهد نوح عليه السلام الى آخر دولة الترك من كتاب العناصر لمجالس الملك الناصر ; ثغر دمياط المحروس وما وقع بها من عهد نوح عليه السلام الى آخر دولة الترك من كتاب العناصر لمجالس الملك الناصر CREATOR/CONTRIBUTOR: Maqrīzī, Aḥmad ibn ʻAlī, 1364-1442, creator مقريزي، أحمد بن علي،, 1364 al-Malik al-Muẓaffar Sayf al-Dīn al-Muʿizzī , third Mamlūk sultan of the Dawlat al-Turk or Baḥrī dynasty. A nephew of the K̲h̲wārazm-S̲h̲āh D̲j̲alāl al-Dīn, Ḳuṭuz (whose original Muslim name was Maḥmūd b. Mamdūd) was taken prisoner by the Mongols and sold to a Damascus merchant who, in turn, sold him to the Mamlūk amīr Aybak in Cairo. Aybak, as the husband of S̲h̲ad̲j̲ar al-Durr, became in 648/1250 al-Malik al-Muʿizz, from which title Ḳuṭuz derived his nisba , al-Muʿizzī. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Political Theory Leigh K. Jenco, Murad Idris, Megan C. Thomas · 2019 · Political Science The lens of mamlūk military slavery has dominated studies of medieval Egypt. ... dynasty (established by Salāh al-Dīn in the twelfth century) to the Turkish Mamluk sultanate in the mid-thirteenth century. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Medieval Warfare and Military Technology Clifford J. Rogers, William Caferro, Shelley Reid · 2010 · History In general, the Mamluk Sultanate was referred to at the time as the “Turkish state” or “dynasty” ( dawlat al-turk/atrak). In this period the emergence of the Ottoman Turkish dynasty challenged what remained of the Byzantine Empire, eventually absorbing the other Turkish domains in Anatolia, while the Turkic Mamluk Empire “The Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries: Emergence of the Ottomans.” Ottoman Dress and Design in the West: A Visual History of Cultural Exchange, by Charlotte A. Jirousek and Sara Catterall, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, USA, 2019, pp. 41-78. Mamlūk authors almost always refer to their Sultanate as " the state of the Turks " ( dawlat al - atrāk dawlat al - turk/ al - dawla al - turkiyya ) . They usually seem to be aware of the fact that the reign of the “ Turks " Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam,Volume 39 Magnes Press, The Hebrew University., 2012 The Mamluks (whose name denotes their slave status) were a quintessential Turkic military dynasty. Spannaus, Nathan. “HISTORY AND CONTINUITY: AL-AZHAR AND EGYPT.” Modern Islamic Authority and Social Change, Volume 1: Evolving Debates in Muslim Majority Countries, edited by MASOODA BANO, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2018, pp. 79-101. What they did not know was that with Baybars, a new Turkish dynasty would unify the Islamic Middle East with an uncompromising commitment to jihad not seen since the days of Saladin “BETWEEN THE MAMLUKS AND THE MONGOLS: 1250-1260.” Accursed Tower: The Crusaders' Last Battle for the Holy Land, by ROGER CROWLEY, Yale University Press, NEW HAVEN; LONDON, 2019, pp. 40-50. He ended up assassinating the leading Mameluks, the Turkish dynasty that had held power since the 13th century. “Of Egypt and Levantine Plagues.” Free Trade’s First Missionary: Sir John Bowring in Europe and Asia, by Philip Bowring, Hong Kong University Press, 2014, pp. 73-82.
In short, it is hard to think of any other ethnolinguistic entity in history that conquered so vast a territory and founded so many empires and states, also contributing to world civilizations. The history of the Turkic peoples was an important factor in world history for more than a millennium until the emergence of Europe as the world's dominant power. What happened in the Turkic world often affected the history of China, Central Asia, the Middle East, South Asia, and Europe. One may also argue that world history began with the "Turko-Mongol" empire created by Chinggis Khan. In the contemporary world, Turkic-speaking nations form six states (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, and Turkey/Türkiye) and several "autonomous" units in Russia (the republics of Chuvash, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Altai, Khakassia, Tuva, and Sakha) and China (the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region). Turkic peoples also reside as minority groups in several other countries, including Mongolia and Iran, among others. It would therefore be difficult to acquire a comprehensive understanding of world history as well as our present world without studying the history of the Turkic peoples.
Être fort comme un Turc (‘to be strong like a turk’): This expression originates in the 15th century when the Turks had a reputation for being strong, almost unbeatable warriors due to their numerous victories. At the time, the Ottoman Empire ruled large parts of south-east Europe, north Africa and western Asia. It is said that François I, King of France, was gifted Turkish armour by Suleiman the Magnificent (the tenth and most famous sultan of the Ottoman Empire) during their alliance. When he wore it, he is said to have exclaimed: “Here I am now, strong as a Turk!”.
The Italian traveler Pietro della Valle, who visited the Safavid Empire during the reign of Shah Abbas I, wrote that the only information in the state was the military elite, who monopolized all the posts of provincial governors and most important positions since the Safavid rule in the early 16th century. He also described that the Persians lived under the intolerable enslavement of the Turkomans.
*In Iran entered a period of relative obscurity and seclusion under two dynasties of Turkish origin: the Safavids and the Qajars.[1] *The Safavids were of Turkish descent..[2] *As with their Safavid predecessors, the new dynasty was of Turkish origin ; and administrative institutions similar to those the Safavids had attempted to build up were revived.[3] *There was a real need for the Safavids to disassociate themselves from their arch-foes by playing down their own Turkish origins.[4]
*The Divan of Shah İsmail, the founder of the Safavid Dynasty was written in Turkish,, because he was of Turcoman origin.[5] *The Safavids (1501-1722), two major dynasties of Turkish origin.[6] *The modern history of Persia really begins with the rise of the SAFAVID dynasty in 1500. Although these rulers were also Turkish in origin, they espoused the SHITTE form of Islam and established a state.[7] *The Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal Empires. Though political and ideological rivals, all three empires were of Turkic origin and belonged to the same Persianate cultural universe.[8] *Form of Shi'ism under pressure from the Safavids, originally a Turkic Sufi order who were themselves former Sunnis.[9] *The three Islamic empires of the early modern period - the Mughal, the Safavid, and the Ottoman - shared a common Turko-Mongolian heritage.[10] *Safavid power with its distinctive Persian-Shi‘i culture, however, remained a middle ground between its two mighty Turkish neighbors. The Safavid state, which lasted at least until 1722, was essentially a "Turkish" dynasty, with Azeri Turkish (Azerbaijan being the family's home base) as the language of the rulers and the court as well as the Qizilbash military establishment.[11] *Under the Safavids, the Azeri Turks came into conflict with the expanding Ottoman Turks[12] *A massive migration of Oghuz Turks in the l lth and l2th centuries not only Turkified Azerbaijan but also Anatolia. The Azeri Turks are Shi'ites and were founders of the Safavid dynasty.[13] *The modern history of Persia really begins with the rise of the *Safavid Dynasty in 1500. Although these rulers were also Turkish in origin, they espoused the Shi'ite form of Islam.[14]
*The Caucasus was a battleground between the Sunni Ottoman Empire and the Turkic Shia Safavid Dynasty of Persia.[15]
*Shah Isma'il I (1500-24), the founder of the Safavid dynasty of Azeri origin, made the Shi'a branch of Islam.[16] *This family, reported by some sources to be of Azerbaijani origin[17]
*Three major Islamic empires emerged, all with Turkic roots to varying degrees: those of the Ottomans (1300-1922), Safavids (1501-1722), and Moghuls (1526-1858).[18] *The Ottoman eastward expansion was stalled by the rise of another Turkish dynasty, the Safavids, in Persia.[19] *The Safavid Turks, who had their genesis in a Shia dervish order in Azerbaijan.[20] *Selim I captured the Capital Tebriz also and thus put a check on the growth of the military power of the Safavid Turks.[21] * “gunpowder empires”: the Empire of the Ottoman Turks (centered in Turkey), that of the Safavid Turks (centered in Iran or Persia)[22] *Discuss the religious and political issues that separated the Ottoman Turks and the Safavid Turks.[23] *See Ottoman Empire; Safavid Turks Turks, 10 revolt against, 225 Safavid, 30 Twelver branch.[24] * In the early 16th century, the Azeri dynasty of the Safavids ( r. 1501-1736 ) took power in Tabriz and developed a culture that influenced much of the region.[25] *Of three great empires: the Mughals in South Asia, the ?afavids in Persia, and the Ottomans in the west. The three empires shared basic features such as Turkic dynastic origins.[26] *What most Iranians are not told (neither by the Shia clergy nor ultra-Iranian nationalits) is how the Turkic Safavids slaughtered thousands upon thousands of Persians (Sunnis), starting with the elite, the thinkers and scholars.[27] *The rule of the Turkic Safavids completed the process of linguistic Turkicisation of modern Azerbaijanis which was initiated by the Seljuks in the eleventh century.[28] *Buyids (Iranian) (945-1055) . Ghaznavids (Turkic) (994-1030) . Seljuks (Turkic) (1045-1217) . Mongol/Ilkhanid Dynasties (Turkicized Mongols) (1221-1338) . Timurids and Turkmen (Turkic) (1383-1501) . Safavids (Turkic) (1501-1722)[29] * Although arising from a local, originally Sunni Sufi order in Azerbaijan, the Turkish Safavids speedily became the vigorous upholders of Shi'ism.[30] *The Safavid and Qajar dynasties,rulers in Iran from 1501 to 1722 and from 1795 to 1925 respectively,were Turkic in origin[31] *Understands political achievements of the Safavid and Mughal Empires ,how Persia was unified by the Turkic Safavids.[32] *Therefore, the student is able to: 5-12 Explain the unification of Persia under the Turkic Safavids.[33] *To bolster its legitimacy, the Turkish Safavid dynasty created the fiction of an ancestral link.[34] *The Turkic origin of the Safavid dynasty,which is rarely acknowledged in u conventional Turkish nationalist historiography.[35] *Shah Ismail, a Turk of the Shi'i sect of Islam, arose as leader of both Turkic and Iranian adherents of this sect, who placed more emphasis upon religion than upon ethnic origin.[36] * The Safavids were originally Turkic, ghazis like the Osmanlis and succeeded, like them, in distancing possible rivals.[37] * The Safavids were descended from a family of Turkmen Sufi sheikhs from Ardabil, in Azerbaijan.[38] * In the early 1500s, a thirteen-year-old Turkmen named Ismail, who lived in western Iran, conquered the whole country[39] * Yet even Iran's foreign conquerors - such as the Turkic Safavid, Afshar, and Qajar dynasties.[40] Sources: *1-Women, Religion and Culture in Iran *2-World History DeMYSTiFieD Stephanie Muntone McGraw Hill Professional-Page 238 *3-Modern Persian Prose Literature-Page 9 *4-Comparative History of Civilizations in Asia: 10,000 B.C. to 1850 Edward L. Farmer Westview Press-Page 430 *5-Cultural Horizons: A festschrift in honor of Talat S. Halman,Volume 1 Jayne L. Warne Syracuse University Press, 2001 *6-Women's History in Global Perspective,Volume 3-Page 82 *7-New Catholic Encyclopedia: A-Azt-Page 140 *8-The Eckstein Shahnama: An Ottoman Book of KingsWill Kwiatkowski Sam Fogg,2005-Page 9 *9-Religions of Iran: From Prehistory to the Present-Page 192 *10-Safavid, Mughal,and Ottoman Empires(Cambridge University Press) *11-Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective(Cambridge University Press)-Page 86-87. *12-Global Security Watch-The Caucasus States-Page 3 *13-Iran II: Iranian history - Iran V: Peoples of Iran,Volume 3 Ehsan Yarshater The Encyclopaedia Iranica Foundation,2006-Page 325 *14-New Catholic Encyclopedia-Volumr 1.-18.-Page 16 *15-Caucasus:Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide-Page 3 *16-Eastern Europe, Russia and Central Asia 2003-Page 104 *17-Azerbaijan, Mosques, Turrets, Palaces Ilona Turánszky Corvina Kiadó,1979-Page 21 *18-The Turks in World History(Oxford University Press)-Page 94 *19-Conflict, Conquest, and Conversion: Two Thousand Years of Christian Missions in the Middle East(Columbia University Press) *20-The Rising Tide of Cultural Pluralism: The Nation-state at Bay?(Univ of Wisconsin Press) *21-Proceedings of the All Pakistan Political Science Conference,Volume *22-Expansion and Global Interaction, 1200-1700 David R. Ringrose Longman,2001-Page 135 *23-Student Study Guide and Map Exercise Workbook to accompany Traditions and Encounters,Volume 2 BENTLEY McGraw-Hill Companies,Incorporated *24-The Politics of the Middle East Monte Palmer F.E. Peacock Publishers,2002-Page 425 *25-Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture: Three-Volume Set(Oxford University Press)-Page 236 *26-The Oxford Encyclopedia of Islam and Politics Emad Eldin Shahin, ?Peri J. Bearman, ?Sohail H. Hashmi - 2014 *27-Son of Sunnah-Persian Sunni scholars VS the King of the Safavids *28-Routledge Handbook of the Caucasus *29-Christianity in Persia and the Status of Non-Muslims in Modern Iran-Page 275 *30-Encyclopaedia of Islam Ian Richard Netton-Page 570 *31-Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Africa and the Middle East-Page 707 *32-Content knowledge: a compendium of standards and benchmarks for K-12 education John S. Kendall, Robert J. Marzano Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory,1996-Page 243 *33-National standards for history National Center for History in the Schools (U.S.), Charlotte Antoinette Crabtree, Gary B. Nash-Page 180 *34-Government and Politics of the Contemporary Middle East: Continuity and change-Page *35-New Perspectives on Turkey,36-37.-Page 230 *36-The Middle East and South Asia,Stryker-Post Publications,1968-Page 10 *37- The History of the World JJohn Morris Roberts, Odd Arne Westad (Oxford University Press)-Page 403 *38-The Safavids and their Successors - The David Collection *39- Iran the People - Page 10 *40- Iran and the world: continuity in a revolutionary decade(Indiana University Press)-Page 11
"Your land is either colonized and replaced by Turk, Or ruled by the Turks as your kings of elites" Elijah Oliver Dickenson (a British officer from India British Raj and a historian of Turkic culture) Pretty accurate. Turks are either your kings or your replacers of population.
The Mughals (1526-1858) lost control of India in the 1700s, but many of the local rulers who replaced them were also Turks, at least until the British took over. Chase, K. (2003). Conclusion. In Firearms: A Global History to 1700 (pp. 197-210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511806681.009
@@pompacitokmakci On a VERY unrelated note. You'll appreciate this Yoruk quote. "We migrated to Anatolia because God told us so, and we migrated to Anatolia because God made his garden here" Yoruk Proverb
The backbone and most umportant part of the Mongol army were Turks, Cengiz and han are Turkish words and names. The mongols simply didnt have enough manpower to create the biggest empire in the history it was the Turks
Birader tarih ve gerceklerde "yersiz" diye bir gtanim yok sadece gercekler, Mogol ordusunun neredeyse tamami Turklerden olusmaktaydi Mogollar'in yeterli insan gucu yoktu.
@@vitalalive69 cengizin ordusunda türk de vardı ama ordusu tamamen türk değildi. Moğollar da türkler gibi göçebe olduğundan savaş tarzları birbirine benzer.
@@iskambillordu Cengiz han in ordusunun 70%-80% türk olduklari tahmin ediliyor. Zaten mogollar kücük bir toplumdu eger cengiz hanin nasil hükümdar oldugunu arastirirsan zaten türk devletlerini birlestirdigini anlarsin.
You Tube why do Turks at central asia call them as kazakh , kyrgyz or uzbek ? At least you can call yourself Kazakh Turks , Uzbek Turks or Kyrgyz Turks
They are already called like that. Both terms are used ( kazakh - kazakh turk; uzbek- uzbek turk etc.) But it's shorter and hence easier to say kazakh, krygyz ,azeri etc. No need to add "turk" to the end cuz everybody will understand that when u say kazakh, you mean the turks living in central asia in their own state called Kazakhistan etc. :)
Dogan Cetinkal when we talk about our ethnic we call Turk but when they talk about their ethnic they call theirself kazakh , uzbek etc and it seems we are different people
Yep, we all are originally same (Turk), but of course time, region and interaction with neighbours have affected and changed cultures by time. Hence Uzbek, Kazakh, Azerbayjani, Turks (Turks in Turkey) etc. all are different people for sure but they are all Turkic people and nations and have many in common.
Tureg'in ilk kralına Buman adı verildi. Buman Moğolca bir kelimedir. Moğolcada sonsuz demektir. Tureg, diğer birçok Moğol kralı tarafından yönetildi. örneğin tulan kralı, sintine kralı, tengri kralı, baimei kralı, ijan kralı vb. İlk kral Moğol iken Türklerin hüküm sürdüğü doğru değil. Türkçe konuşan ve yazan Tatarlar Moğollarla bir arada yaşadılar ama Türklerin hepsi bir arada yaşamadı.
Tureg'in ilk kralına Buman adı verildi. Buman Moğolca bir kelimedir. Moğolcada sonsuz demektir. Tureg, diğer birçok Moğol kralı tarafından yönetildi. örneğin tulan kralı, sintine kralı, tengri kralı, baimei kralı, ijan kralı vb. İlk kral Moğol iken Türklerin hüküm sürdüğü doğru değil. Türkçe konuşan ve yazan Tatarlar Moğollarla bir arada yaşadılar ama Türklerin hepsi bir arada yaşamadı.
@@user-sw6ip2hk5w (Asya Hun imparatorluğu, Göktürk İmparatorluğu Türklerin bir arada olduğu imparatorlukları) Türklerin ilk dini Tengri ve bu dini 2000 yıl öncede kullanıyordu Türkler
"Timur had not captured anyone from the people of Anatolia after the Battle of Ankara. Because the state he was fighting was also a Turk state. He remained loyal to the tradition, which had the understanding that a Turk would not be a prisoner. " -Ducas, Byzantine History, p.174
Modu Chanyu was the second ruler (“chanyu” in Ancient Chinese sources - 單于) of Xiongnu, a nomadic Empire situated in East-Central Asia. He reigned between 209-174 BC. As far as we interpret from the Chinese sources, at least we know that his title is Turkic: 冒頓單于 Modu Chanyu or 撐犁孤塗單于 (chengli gutu chanyu)- transliterated as “Tengri Qutluğ Yabgu?”.(The translation of the chanyu is somewhat disputed, some Turkologists claim “Chanyu” is “Tarkan” another Turkic title, it could be “yabgu”, or maybe “tanhu”- there is no general consensus). The first two words are certainly Turkic, “Tengri” is Turkic for god, and Qutluğ is “blessed” implying the bearer of the title as “blessed by the God”. (In today’s modern Turkish language, “Tengri Qutluğ” would be “Tanrı kutlu”) We can say that the Modu Chanyu certainly had Turkic titles, so most probably, yes, he was Turkic. Back then, the region was inhabited by speakers of the Proto-Turkic language.
RevanX this video is has real as Turkic history 😂😂😂 this video is joke just like Turkic history 😂😂 Turkic peoples also believe that Mongolic rulers like Timur , Batu Khan and others and Iranic rulers like Shah Ismail , Muhammad of Ghor and others were Turkic 😂😂😂 every body knows Turkic history is joke compare to Iranic history Turkic peoples brave ??? 😂😂😂 only First Iranic and Turkic war > all Turkic war 🤣🤣🤣 when Bahram Chobin beat 300,000 Turkic peoples in many battles like in battle of Hyrcanian rock and won war with only 12,000 WON WAR is sister Gordiya beat Turkic warriors and champions 🤣 🤣🤣 Iranic peoples ruled Turkic peoples most of time for example big part of Turkic peoples are under Iranic peoples in Afghanistan since the time of Ahmed Shah Durrani LOL that 250 years Turkic peoples were slav*** of Iranic warriors and military commanders like Abu Muslim , Saladin , Muhammad of Ghor , Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad , Khaydhar ibn Kawus al-Afshin , Mardavij, Ismail Samanid and many more form the time of Abu Muslim to the time of Samanid empire Turkic peoples were slav*** of Iranians and Arabs specially Iranic peoples 🤣🤣 more than 150 years Turkic peoples run away form Abu Muslim to Tang Dynasty and after they run back run to Abu Muslim because of the Tang Dynasty 🤣🤣 they join Abu Muslim the best warrior in is time in battle of talas because they were scared of Tang Dynasty 🤣😂
RevanX half of this video is fake just google about the origin of the Safavids, Mughals , Golden Horde , and others this video is joke just like Turkic history JUST GOOGLE
@@yaqubleis6311 *In Iran entered a period of relative obscurity and seclusion under two dynasties of Turkish origin: the Safavids and the Qajars.[1] *The Safavids were of Turkish descent..[2] *As with their Safavid predecessors, the new dynasty was of Turkish origin ; and administrative institutions similar to those the Safavids had attempted to build up were revived.[3] *There was a real need for the Safavids to disassociate themselves from their arch-foes by playing down their own Turkish origins.[4]
*The Divan of Shah İsmail, the founder of the Safavid Dynasty was written in Turkish,, because he was of Turcoman origin.[5] *The Safavids (1501-1722), two major dynasties of Turkish origin.[6] *The modern history of Persia really begins with the rise of the SAFAVID dynasty in 1500. Although these rulers were also Turkish in origin, they espoused the SHITTE form of Islam and established a state.[7] *The Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal Empires. Though political and ideological rivals, all three empires were of Turkic origin and belonged to the same Persianate cultural universe.[8] *Form of Shi'ism under pressure from the Safavids, originally a Turkic Sufi order who were themselves former Sunnis.[9] *The three Islamic empires of the early modern period - the Mughal, the Safavid, and the Ottoman - shared a common Turko-Mongolian heritage.[10] *Safavid power with its distinctive Persian-Shi‘i culture, however, remained a middle ground between its two mighty Turkish neighbors. The Safavid state, which lasted at least until 1722, was essentially a "Turkish" dynasty, with Azeri Turkish (Azerbaijan being the family's home base) as the language of the rulers and the court as well as the Qizilbash military establishment.[11] *Under the Safavids, the Azeri Turks came into conflict with the expanding Ottoman Turks[12] *A massive migration of Oghuz Turks in the l lth and l2th centuries not only Turkified Azerbaijan but also Anatolia. The Azeri Turks are Shi'ites and were founders of the Safavid dynasty.[13] *The modern history of Persia really begins with the rise of the *Safavid Dynasty in 1500. Although these rulers were also Turkish in origin, they espoused the Shi'ite form of Islam.[14]
*The Caucasus was a battleground between the Sunni Ottoman Empire and the Turkic Shia Safavid Dynasty of Persia.[15]
*Shah Isma'il I (1500-24), the founder of the Safavid dynasty of Azeri origin, made the Shi'a branch of Islam.[16] *This family, reported by some sources to be of Azerbaijani origin[17]
*Three major Islamic empires emerged, all with Turkic roots to varying degrees: those of the Ottomans (1300-1922), Safavids (1501-1722), and Moghuls (1526-1858).[18] *The Ottoman eastward expansion was stalled by the rise of another Turkish dynasty, the Safavids, in Persia.[19] *The Safavid Turks, who had their genesis in a Shia dervish order in Azerbaijan.[20] *Selim I captured the Capital Tebriz also and thus put a check on the growth of the military power of the Safavid Turks.[21] * “gunpowder empires”: the Empire of the Ottoman Turks (centered in Turkey), that of the Safavid Turks (centered in Iran or Persia)[22] *Discuss the religious and political issues that separated the Ottoman Turks and the Safavid Turks.[23] *See Ottoman Empire; Safavid Turks Turks, 10 revolt against, 225 Safavid, 30 Twelver branch.[24] * In the early 16th century, the Azeri dynasty of the Safavids ( r. 1501-1736 ) took power in Tabriz and developed a culture that influenced much of the region.[25] *Of three great empires: the Mughals in South Asia, the ?afavids in Persia, and the Ottomans in the west. The three empires shared basic features such as Turkic dynastic origins.[26] *What most Iranians are not told (neither by the Shia clergy nor ultra-Iranian nationalits) is how the Turkic Safavids slaughtered thousands upon thousands of Persians (Sunnis), starting with the elite, the thinkers and scholars.[27] *The rule of the Turkic Safavids completed the process of linguistic Turkicisation of modern Azerbaijanis which was initiated by the Seljuks in the eleventh century.[28] *Buyids (Iranian) (945-1055) . Ghaznavids (Turkic) (994-1030) . Seljuks (Turkic) (1045-1217) . Mongol/Ilkhanid Dynasties (Turkicized Mongols) (1221-1338) . Timurids and Turkmen (Turkic) (1383-1501) . Safavids (Turkic) (1501-1722)[29] * Although arising from a local, originally Sunni Sufi order in Azerbaijan, the Turkish Safavids speedily became the vigorous upholders of Shi'ism.[30] *The Safavid and Qajar dynasties,rulers in Iran from 1501 to 1722 and from 1795 to 1925 respectively,were Turkic in origin[31] *Understands political achievements of the Safavid and Mughal Empires ,how Persia was unified by the Turkic Safavids.[32] *Therefore, the student is able to: 5-12 Explain the unification of Persia under the Turkic Safavids.[33] *To bolster its legitimacy, the Turkish Safavid dynasty created the fiction of an ancestral link.[34] *The Turkic origin of the Safavid dynasty,which is rarely acknowledged in u conventional Turkish nationalist historiography.[35] *Shah Ismail, a Turk of the Shi'i sect of Islam, arose as leader of both Turkic and Iranian adherents of this sect, who placed more emphasis upon religion than upon ethnic origin.[36] * The Safavids were originally Turkic, ghazis like the Osmanlis and succeeded, like them, in distancing possible rivals.[37] * The Safavids were descended from a family of Turkmen Sufi sheikhs from Ardabil, in Azerbaijan.[38] * In the early 1500s, a thirteen-year-old Turkmen named Ismail, who lived in western Iran, conquered the whole country[39] * Yet even Iran's foreign conquerors - such as the Turkic Safavid, Afshar, and Qajar dynasties.[40] Sources: *1-Women, Religion and Culture in Iran *2-World History DeMYSTiFieD Stephanie Muntone McGraw Hill Professional-Page 238 *3-Modern Persian Prose Literature-Page 9 *4-Comparative History of Civilizations in Asia: 10,000 B.C. to 1850 Edward L. Farmer Westview Press-Page 430 *5-Cultural Horizons: A festschrift in honor of Talat S. Halman,Volume 1 Jayne L. Warne Syracuse University Press, 2001 *6-Women's History in Global Perspective,Volume 3-Page 82 *7-New Catholic Encyclopedia: A-Azt-Page 140 *8-The Eckstein Shahnama: An Ottoman Book of KingsWill Kwiatkowski Sam Fogg,2005-Page 9 *9-Religions of Iran: From Prehistory to the Present-Page 192 *10-Safavid, Mughal,and Ottoman Empires(Cambridge University Press) *11-Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective(Cambridge University Press)-Page 86-87. *12-Global Security Watch-The Caucasus States-Page 3 *13-Iran II: Iranian history - Iran V: Peoples of Iran,Volume 3 Ehsan Yarshater The Encyclopaedia Iranica Foundation,2006-Page 325 *14-New Catholic Encyclopedia-Volumr 1.-18.-Page 16 *15-Caucasus:Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide-Page 3 *16-Eastern Europe, Russia and Central Asia 2003-Page 104 *17-Azerbaijan, Mosques, Turrets, Palaces Ilona Turánszky Corvina Kiadó,1979-Page 21 *18-The Turks in World History(Oxford University Press)-Page 94 *19-Conflict, Conquest, and Conversion: Two Thousand Years of Christian Missions in the Middle East(Columbia University Press) *20-The Rising Tide of Cultural Pluralism: The Nation-state at Bay?(Univ of Wisconsin Press) *21-Proceedings of the All Pakistan Political Science Conference,Volume *22-Expansion and Global Interaction, 1200-1700 David R. Ringrose Longman,2001-Page 135 *23-Student Study Guide and Map Exercise Workbook to accompany Traditions and Encounters,Volume 2 BENTLEY McGraw-Hill Companies,Incorporated *24-The Politics of the Middle East Monte Palmer F.E. Peacock Publishers,2002-Page 425 *25-Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture: Three-Volume Set(Oxford University Press)-Page 236 *26-The Oxford Encyclopedia of Islam and Politics Emad Eldin Shahin, ?Peri J. Bearman, ?Sohail H. Hashmi - 2014 *27-Son of Sunnah-Persian Sunni scholars VS the King of the Safavids *28-Routledge Handbook of the Caucasus *29-Christianity in Persia and the Status of Non-Muslims in Modern Iran-Page 275 *30-Encyclopaedia of Islam Ian Richard Netton-Page 570 *31-Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Africa and the Middle East-Page 707 *32-Content knowledge: a compendium of standards and benchmarks for K-12 education John S. Kendall, Robert J. Marzano Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory,1996-Page 243 *33-National standards for history National Center for History in the Schools (U.S.), Charlotte Antoinette Crabtree, Gary B. Nash-Page 180 *34-Government and Politics of the Contemporary Middle East: Continuity and change-Page *35-New Perspectives on Turkey,36-37.-Page 230 *36-The Middle East and South Asia,Stryker-Post Publications,1968-Page 10 *37- The History of the World JJohn Morris Roberts, Odd Arne Westad (Oxford University Press)-Page 403 *38-The Safavids and their Successors - The David Collection *39- Iran the People - Page 10 *40- Iran and the world: continuity in a revolutionary decade(Indiana University Press)-Page 11
Add Scythians Tagar,Botai and Karasuk cultures Contemporary descendants of western Scythian groups are found among various groups in the Caucasus and Central Asia, while similarities to eastern Scythian are found to be more widespread, but almost exclusively among Turkic language speaking (formerly) nomadic groups, particularly from the Kipchak branch of Turkic languages (Supplementary Note 1). Unterländer, M., Palstra, F., Lazaridis, I. et al.Ancestry and demography and descendants of Iron Age nomads of the Eurasian Steppe. Nat Commun 8, 14615 (2017). We observed particularly high similarity between the Tagar and Classic Scythians from the North Pontic region. In a comparison of our Tagar series with modern populations in Eurasia, we detected similarity between the Tagar group and some modern Turkic-speaking populations (with the exception of the Indo-Iranian Tajik population) (Fig 7; S2 Table). Among the modern Turkic-speaking groups, populations from the western part of the Eurasian steppe belt, such as Bashkirs from the Volga-Ural region and Siberian Tatars from the West Siberian forest-steppe zone, were more similar to the Tagar group than modern Turkic-speaking populations of the Altay-Sayan mountain system (including the Khakassians from the Minusinsk basin) (Fig 7). Based on our results, we can preliminarily conclude that there was genetic continuity, at least partially, between the Early, the Middle and the Late Tagar populations. We did not find evidence of extensive gene exchange between the Tagar population and any genetically distinct (with respect to the mtDNA pool) human groups. Maternal genetic features of the Iron Age Tagar population from Southern Siberia (1st millennium BC) Pilipenko AS, Trapezov RO, Cherdantsev SV, Babenko VN, Nesterova MS, et al. (2018)Maternal genetic features of the Iron Age Tagar population from Southern Siberia (1st millennium BC). PLOS ONE 13(9): e0204062.
@@rbcso9144 Seni bilgimle düzeltirim ama şimdi kim uğraşıcak. Bak sadece şunu söyleyim, İskitlere Hint-Avrupalı denmesinin sebebi gümüş bir kaptır ve bu kabın üzerinde runik harflerle bir yazı yazar. Bunu hatalı bir şekilde okurlar ve bu uydurma olan bu tezin mazisi burada başlar. İskitler kozmopolit bir halktı ama yöneticleri ve kurucuları Türktü.
During Timur's lifetime, 6 empires crushed more than 10 states. This is too much for the whole persian history The strongest empires of the period disappeared against his, the Ottoman Empire, the Mamluk empire, the Golden Horde empire, the Chagatai empire, the Delhi empire, the Qara Qoyunlu empire,Kharezm kingdom,Serbedar kingdom,Toga Timur kingdom,Muzafferi kingdom,Kert kingdom,Jalayir kingdom,Georgian kingdom,Burhanneddin kingdom,Persian kingdom and others. Timur conquered many empires and he built the strongest empire in the world alone In the Battle of Samarkand he defeated the Chagatai Khanate in 10,000 vs 30,000 in 1 to 3 ratio and escaped by barely saving the Mongol Khan. He destroyed 100 elephants army in Battle of Delhi, he defeated 60,000 men at a ratio of 1 to 2 in the Battle of the Kondurcha River with 30,000 men, he crushed the Persian army in the Battle of Isfahan and built towers out of their heads LOOOLL he victory by killing 50,000 men against an army of 140,000 in the Battle of the Terek river, he defeated the Mamluk Sultan's army of 80,000 people in the Battle of Damascus and locked the Sultan in the city, then he destroyed the Georgian kingdom and put the Ottomans in a period of temporary collapse in the Battle of Ankara. he defetaed 85,000 Ottoman, 30,000 Georgians, 80,000 Mamluks, 45,000 Indians, 200,000 Persians, 140,000 Kipchaks and a total army of 580,000 in 7 years.Cyrus and Shapur a joke,PERSİAN HİSTORY JOKE
Merhaba 😊, I am from Tunisia and descendant of Crimean-Tatar mamluk of Ottoman Army in Tunus. 25% of Tunisia are descendants of Turks, there are millions descendants of Turks in North-Africa except Morocco. I am also scared they would lose their Ottoman heritage 😔. I am self proud of my Tatar/Turk/Ottoman heritage I would say I am Tatar/Turk before Tunisian, my dream is to InsAllah move to Istanbul Turkey and therefore study at Ankara tech university. Greetings my Turkic brothers from Tunisia 😁.
Where sakas , kushans ? Oxford Saka is Turkic origin. Turkish influence Turkic tribes like Sakas, Kushanas, when they settled on India's borders and inside it also adopted ... Julian Raby of Oxford has done a PhD thesis on this subject) that Fetih, the Conqueror of ... www.cs.colostate.edu/~malaiya/turkish.html
well, the Sakas had a written language, and by their words, it was confirmed that it was an Iranian language, probably ancestor of the Wakhi and Sarikoli languages.
Love them or hate them. Turkic peoples are awesome!! My daddy told me cool stories about them as warriors so cool y'all should check the history of them. I'm a 12 year old black american girl and I use to have a Turkic friend she was Uzbek and I love the way she paints pictures of things and show me cool things from Uzbekistan. So sad she had to move to Great Britain she was so fun to has as a friend. Turkics are awesome to me.
their most elite units(yanissaries, quapukulus and ghulams), mostly consisted of captured europeans and steppe children, that they raized up to do soldiering(without having family bonds, loyalty issues etc).
SuperMrFriendly this is the most cruelty of Ottomans but also Janniseries had become most precious army of Ottomans. Its little bit dilemma. They were important than Turkish origin army which name is akinji (cavaliers from turkish village). Janniseries were used hand cannon. They were one of the most fired arm military groups of the world. (second, spanish conquistadors).
SuperMrFriendly yanissaries ghulams and quapukulus were not our most elite units. They where more elite than normal soldiers since they have no bond, but no where near the most elite. The most elite consisted of small groups of soldiers and not big groups like yanissaries. Btw these groups are ottoman groups and this kid is referring to turkic background.
The ancestors of the Indo-Turkic people migrated to South Asia at the time of the Delhi Sultanate and the Mughal Empire. The Delhi Sultanate is a term used to cover five short-lived, Delhi-based kingdoms three of which were of Turkic origin in medieval India. These Turkic dynasties were the Indo-Scythians(controversial),Kushans(controversial),White Huns,Hindu Shahi, Ghaznavids, Delhi Sultanate, Mamluk dynasty (Delhi), Khalji dynasty, Tughlaq dynasty, Bengal Sultanate, Adil Shahi dynasty, Bidar Sultanate, Qutb Shahi dynasty, Timurids, Deccan sultanates, Mughal Empire, Oudh State, Nawabs of Bengal and Murshidabad, Hyderabad State, Khanate of Kalat, Makran (princely state), Banganapalle State, Amb (princely state), Chitral (princely state), Phulra, Hunza (princely state), Nagar (princely state) Mamluk dynasty (1206-90); the Khalji dynasty (1290-1320);Gurjara Prathiara Dynasty (mid-8th century CE-1036 CE); and the Tughlaq dynasty (1320-1414). Southern India also saw many Turkic origin dynasties like the Bahmani Sultanate, the Adil Shahi dynasty, the Bidar Sultanate, and the Qutb Shahi dynasty, collectively known as the Deccan sultanates. The Mughal Empire was a Turkic-founded Indian empire that, at its greatest territorial extent, ruled most of the South Asia, including Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh and parts of Uzbekistan from the early 16th to the early 18th centuries. The Mughal dynasty was founded by a Chagatai Turkic prince named Babur (reigned 1526-30), who was descended from the Turkic conqueror Timur (Tamerlane) on his father's side and from Chagatai, second son of the Mongol ruler Genghis Khan, on his mother's side.Mughals who have Turkic ancestry live in the Indian subcontinent in significant numbers. Karlugh Turks are also found in the Haraza region and in smaller number in Azad Kashmir region of Pakistan. Small number of Uyghurs are also present in India. Many Turks also live in Hyderabad known as Deccani Muslims they have Arab, Afghan, Persian, and Turkic ancestries in addition to having the local dravidian heritage. There is also a significant population an Warriors Status used by Turkic descendants known as Rowther, who are mostly found in Southern India.[1] en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Turkic_people Muhammad Ghori, founder of Ghorid Empire en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turks_in_India
@@user-uj2tk2tv3z Bengal sultanate was turk. Even indo european and indo iranic propagandist website -Vikipedia says Turko-Persian to Bengal by dont want to say turkic to it. Dont wrong yourselves with others. You say even indo iranian to everbody, God,AlliensNeanderthallea.
@TURAN UNİON TURKS Aslinda ayni seyi anlatmaya calisiyoruz sanirim. Evet dediginiz dogru. Lakin mesela İrak Turkleri demekten çok İrak Turkmenleri diyoruz, Suriye Turkleri demek yerine Suriye Turkmenleri, Bayirbucak Turkmenleri vs diyoruz. Halbuki birebir ayniyiz onlarla. Kastettigim fark bu. Turkiyede biz Turkmeniz demekten cok millet adini kullanmayi yani Turkuz demeyi tercih ediyoruz.
azerbaycanlılar sırf karabağ Azerbaycan devletinde gözükmüyor diye video'ya disslike atmayın.bu video sadece hangi toprak kimin elindeyse onu anlatıyor.mal mal iş yapmayın
@@kaldirdimgobegihophopa9811 Kardeş su link de arnavutlar Ataturke arnavut diyolar. Oraya da bi raid yapsaniza th-cam.com/video/nE85HSzSKLc/w-d-xo.html
Arghun Pride almost half this video is fake most of them are not even Turkic origin like Göktürk the rulers of Göktürk were Iranic Saka-Wusun Origin Form the Ashina according to Chinese sources and almost all modern historians Researchers such as H. W. Haussig,[1] S. G. Klyashtorny,[2][3] A. N. Bernstamm,[4] C. V. Findley,[5] D.G. Savinov,[6] S. P. Guschin,[7] Rona-Tas[8] and R. N. Frye[9] have pointed out that the origin of the Ashina is from the Iranian Saka-Wusun Origin form the Ashina tribe
The Mughals (1526-1858) lost control of India in the 1700s, but many of the local rulers who replaced them were also Turks, at least until the British took over. Chase, K. (2003). Conclusion. In Firearms: A Global History to 1700 (pp. 197-210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huns,Xiognu and Hepthalite is Turkic. Hunnic Empire was the empire of the Huns. The Huns were a confederation of Eurasian tribes, especially Turkic ones, from the Steppes of Central Asia. www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Hunnic_Empire ---------------------------------------------------- Recent genetics research in 2003[4] confirmed the studies[5] indicating that the Turkic peoples,[6] originated from the same area and therefore are possibly related. www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Xiongnu ----------------------------------------------------- Hepthalite Imagewww.oxfordreference.com › ... Hephthalites - Oxford Reference Inner Asian 'Hunnic' group (or rather dynasty), perhaps of Turkic origin, whose name appears first in 456; by 467 they had displaced the ... Iranian Huns. The term “Huns” was also used for several tribes who posed a continuous threat to northeastern Iran and northwestern India from the 4th century C.E. Earlier research attempted to establish a connection between the different tribes mentioned in the sources, and to consider them all as Hephthalites (cf. Ghirshman, pp. 69-134). Altheim (III, 1961, p. 7) viewed the Hephthalites as the original tribe of the Huns, from which the European Huns had split off. In addition, he also assumed a Turkish origin for all these tribes (Altheim, I, 1959, pp. 45 ff.). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Babur is Turkic origin. Imagebooks.google.com.tr › books The Oxford Illustrated History of the World Felipe Fernández-Armesto · 2019 · History In July , Ismail was enthroned as Shah and he proclaimed Shiism as ... Turkic-Mongol in origin, the Empire was established in by a Chagatai Turk, Zahiruddin Muhammad Babur books.google.com.tr/books?id=eUSCDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA316&lpg=PA316&dq=babur+shah+turkic+oxford&source=bl&ots=1CRP9wyLg4&sig=ACfU3U3z2yUJfMwp3U8m5uedHqLxLVQYIg&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiii4yH3aTnAhUz4KYKHfv3BdMQ6AEwA3oECAoQAQ Imagewww.cambridge.org › books Safavid, Mughal, and Ottoman Empires (Chapter 1 ... - Cambridge University Press In 1501 Shah Ismail I (1501-1524), the founder of the dynasty, defeated the Turkish Aq Quyunlu forces ... Muhammad Zahir al-Din Babur, a Chagatai Turk from Fergana in Central Asia ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scythian is a confederetion and its founding group was Turkic SAKA. Imagebooks.google.com.tr › books Routledge Revivals: Trade, Travel and Exploration in the Middle ... John Block Friedman, Kristen Mossler Figg · 2017 · History Arab geographers described “Inner Scythia” (the land of the Turkic peoples) using ... Harvard Ukrainian Studies 12/13 (1988-1989): 400-413. ---------------------------------------------------------- These earlier scholars based their accounts not on classical texts but on references to Scythians (sometimes explicitly identified as “Turks”) in medieval Latin and Byzantine universal chronicles and apocalyptic literature. In these sources ... Page153 None of the humanist authors who read Greek-Filelfo, Sagundino, Gaza, Merula -based his history of the Scythian Turks on information from the Histories.139 books.google.com.tr/books?id=XDmZXIDiZG8C&pg=PA149&lpg=PA149&dq=scythian+turks&source=bl&ots=d7qnjR6GgR&sig=ACfU3U1UMWCuSHWCtuxdtMnOdCYJp134VA&hl=tr&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=scythian%20turks&f=false
@Edward Snowden Kurds already freedom 😂 Killing a mother with her baby does not mean that they are prisoners, but that they are free and t*rrorists. (except good people and not supporters of terrorist organization like pkk / isis / ypg). #ErenBülbül #BedirhanKarakaya
@@ancientturkey2308 Ughurs are already free, going to a mining site and Murdering almost a hundred Han Chinese Innocent workers in Cold blood, does not mean they are prisoners but T*rrorists. China should Open a Kurdistan embassy and help people like Ocalan form Kurdish organizations in China just as turkey has done for Ughurs.
From this point of view, a large part of the 19 Cypriot historiography did not manage to achieve the substantial for the historian, to use a phrase by Eric Hobsbawm, overcoming of passions and political identities, 20⁰ identities that were of course created at the end or even after the Ottoman period. That is to say, that the national political identity of the Greek and the Turk, the national political ensembles of Greeks and Turks, realities of the post-Ottoman period in Cyprus are projected on the past of the 16th century. Thus, in 1571 Cyprus was conquered by the Ottomans and for the next three hundred and more years was a part of the Ottoman territory. The Greek Cypriot historiography uses for this transition and generally the entire Ottoman period the term Turkish rule a term that lends a national Turkish identity to Ottomans. A big part of traditional historiography refers to a Turkish state,²¹ mentioning a Turkish government, while correspondingly the conquered are included in another national identity, the Greek, which - and perhaps this is more important - at the time history is written, is in conflict with the Turkish. Already from the end of the 19th century, Greek Cypriot historiography states that during the Turkish rule "the spirit of the inhabitants fell to a pitiful point and poverty and misery and extreme ignorance, and depression of the national morale covered the island".23 The Orthodox on the island are defined by traditional historiography as a political group since "in the vizier's orders the participant in the defence of Famagusta Greek was a term that was generalised for all Greeks on the island". In relation to the population on the island the Turkish rule mentions that "after the occupation of Cyprus by the Turks the census that took place for tax pur poses revealed that the native Cypriot Greeks aged [...] in this population 20.000 30.000 Turks were added".25 It is also established that "the Turkish occupation brought to Cyprus many radical changes. The Turks supported the Greek population on the island in order not to give the opportunity to the peoples of Europe to be interested in the Cypriots […]”.26 And as it began with a national conflict that is how italso ends, since it is mentioned that “while the Turkish conquerors suppressed andpersecuted the Greeks on the island […]”.27 The existence therefore of a politicalnational group is considered given and every analysis of the Ottoman period func-tions in a way to bring to the forefront or reinforce the existence, even under difficultconditions, of such a group. This expressed the stereotyped view that the Cypriots“managed under the protection of the Church to maintain their religion, language,and national conscience as Greeks”.28 Even when relations are examined on differentlevels, even when they refer to the 17th century, these are characterised as relationsof the “Greeks and the Turks of Cyprus”.29 In the Turkish Cypriot historiography, the same perception is more or less fol-lowed; history is written under the same terms, the national terms but with one sub-stantial difference: The “Turks on the island” 30 are usually referred to as acomplimentary term of the word Ottomans and are placed on the side of the goodoften contrary to the “Greeks, Greek Cypriots” who are on the opposite side. Thesettlement of the “Turks”on the island is interpreted as something that broughtabout positive results for the entire island 31 and the local Ottoman administration isgenerally whitewashed. In short, Turkish Cypriot historiography also accepts theexistence of national groups. The Church of Cyprus expresses again the Greeks of Cyprus and its activities are mainly targeted against the Turks of Cyprus, 32 whilewithout hesitation the actions of the Prelates of 1600 in Cyprus are combined andidentified with the Akritas plan of the period after the independence. 33 The Prelatesare considered to express not only spiritually but also nationally the Orthodox of Cyprus while institutionally the Church of Cyprus is perceived as warring towardsthe local Turkish administration. 34 The Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot histo-riographies are identified when they project the present on the past, a past howeverthat is perceived and interpreted from a very different national point of view. Michael, M., Kappler, M. and Gavriel, E., 2009. Ottoman Cyprus: A Collection of Studies on History and Culture Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp.14,15.
3 ปีที่แล้ว +3
From the east to sunrise in the east, to the middle of the day in the south, from the west to the sunset in the west, to the midnight in the north, the people in it always follow me.
@@purple.requiem turkish and turk are not the same things. turkish are Anatolia turks and Cyprus turks. Orher turks are Azerbaijani turks, Turkmen turks, Uzbek turks, Uyghur turks, Altai turks, Kerkuk turkmens, Gagauz turks, kazakhs, Yakut turks and etc
Azerbaijan❤Iran. turk azerbaijani qajars , safavids,and afshars ruled iran 500 years. persians love turk azerbaijan! azerbaijanis were greatest turkic warriors and lions 🇦🇿❤🇮🇷
Turkic peoples founded many dynasties that ruled other nations in history. The Arpad Dynasty was a Turkic origin dynasty that ruled the Hungarians and invaded Europe[23][24][25][26] The Krum dynasty was the founder of the First Bulgarian empire of Turkic origin and ruled to become the most powerful empire of the period[27][28][29][30][31][32] Wei dynasty was a Turkic dynasty that ruled the Chinese[33][34] Tang dynasty were Turkic soldier origin[35][36]
The Tang dynasty was not turkic you muppet. The second Tang emperor's mother was a concubine, and had mixed Sogdian Han ancestry, whilst his father was fully Han chinese. To your logic, German people ruled over Britain when Queen Victoria ruled, since Prince Albert was German
Rey Strate Y Then go back to Africa because your ancestors genocided neanderthals in middle east. Will you? I don't think so. Plus Turks are mixed with Greeks, didn't steal anything.
Turks cannot stay in one place for long. And once that Turkic tribe moves into foreign lands they don't look back, someone else takes over that land. The Oghuz started from Caspian sea coast of Turkmenistan, then moved to Iran, then to Syria, then to Anatolia, then into Europe. Even the mighty Ottomans an Oghuz descendant did not attempt to occupy Turkmenistan. One more interesting point is their degree of assimilation. In most races there is racial purity but in Turkic lands if you speak Turkic and behave like a Turk you are a Turk.
"In most races there is racial purity but in Turkic lands if you speak Turkic and behave like a Turk you are a Turk." thats what get me :D :D :D and its true :D :D whatever ur origin may be if u behave like a Turk u are a Turk :D
If you are friendly with the Turks, they will sacrifice your life for you.If you become an enemy with the Turkish, they will be even more cruel than God.The whole world is so afraid of the Turks that you can see it everywhere.You can check out the weapon of the latest New Zealand terrorist.God's soldiers on earth are Turks.
Why Xiongnu for a short time? Why not like the Mongol video? Xiongnu is Turkic: . The predecessors of Huihe were Xiongnu. Because, customarily, they ride high-wheeled carts. They were also called Gaoche during the Yuan Wei times, or also called Chile, mistakenly rendered as Tiele. - Xin Tangshu, 232 Weishu, vol. 103 txt: "高車，[...] 其語略與匈奴同而時有小異，或云其先匈奴之甥也", tr: "The Gaoju, [...] their language and the Xiongnu's are similar though differ a little; or to say it differently, they are the sororal nephews/sons-in-laws of the Xiongnu” According to the Book of Wei, the Yuebans' language and customs were the same as the Gaoche, who were Turkic speakers. Yuebans(Weak Xiongnu) cut their hair and trimmed their ghee-smeared, sun-dried, glossy eyebrows evenly, and washed before meals three times everyday. Weishu, Vol. 102 "其風俗言語與高車同，而其人清潔於胡。俗剪髮齊眉，以醍醐塗之，昱昱然光澤，日三澡漱，然後飲食。" Chinese sources link the Tiele people and Ashina to the Xiongnu, According to the Book of Zhou and the History of the Northern Dynasties, the Ashina clan was a component of the Xiongnu confederation. Linghu Defen et al., Book of Zhou, Vol. 50. (in Chinese) Li Yanshou (李延寿), History of the Northern Dynasties, Vol. 99. (in Chinese) Uyghur Khagans claimed descent from the Xiongnu (according to Chinese history Weishu, the founder of the Uyghur Khaganate was descended from a Xiongnu ruler). The Gaoche are probably remnants of the ancient Red Di. Initially they had been called Dili. Northerners take them as Chile. Chinese take them as Gaoche Dingling. Their language, in brief, and Xiongnu [language] are the same yet occasionally there are small differences. Or one may say that they [Gaoche] are the junior relatives[18] of the Xiongnu in former times. The Gaoche migrate in search of grass and water. They dress in skins and eat meat. Their cattle and sheep are just like those of the Rouran, but the wheel of their carts are high and have very many spokes. - Weishu, 103 The forebears of the Tiele belonged to those Xiongnu descendants, having the largest divisions of tribes. They occupied the valleys, and were scattered across the vast region west of the Western Sea [Black Sea] At the area north of the Duluo River, are the Bugu (僕骨), Tongluo (同羅), Weihe (韋紇),[17] Bayegu (拔也古), Fuluo (覆羅), which were all called Sijin (Irkin). Other tribes such as Mengchen (蒙陳), Turuhe (吐如紇), Sijie (斯結),[a] Hun (渾), Hu (斛), Xue (薛) (or Huxue) and so forth, also dwelled in this area. They had a 20,000 strong invincible army. [...] The names of these tribes differ, but all of them can be classified as Tiele. The Tiele do not have a master, but are subjected to the both Eastern and Western Tujue (Göktürks) respectively. They don't have a permanent residence, and move with the changes of grass and water. - Suishu, 84
Xiongnu is Turkic 2: The Xiongnu became politically dominant in the steppes around 300 BC, and although the linguistic affiliation of the Xiongnu proper is still a matter of dispute, their political confederation certainly contained a significant Turkic component. By both ethnohistorical and linguistic considerations this component may in the first place be identified with the Bulgharic (Bulghar Turkic) branch of Turkic, today represented by the Chuvash language in the Volga region. The Turkic component of the Xiongnu is, however, unambiguously signalled by a number of Bulgharic loanwords in Proto-Samoyedic, such as *yür 'hundred'. The Bulgharic (Proto-Bulgharic) speakers are likely to have entered Southern Siberia, the location of Proto-Samoyedic, not earlier than the last century BC. At the same time, a number of local words, notably *kadi 'conifer' (> Chuvash xira,,~ xir 'birch '), were borrowed from Proto-Samoyedic into Bulgharic. An earlier date for the separation of proto-Turkic, preceding 209 BC would support the identification of Xiongnu language with proto-Bulgharic or one of its subgroups, while a later date of separation would make its association with proto-Turkic more plausible. Alexander Savelyev, Martine Robbeets, Bayesian phylolinguistics infers the internal structure and the time-depth of the Turkic language family, Journal of Language Evolution, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2020 As this time depth coincides with the beginning of the Xiongnu empire (209 BCE-100 CE), the association of Xiongnu with Proto-Bulgharic does not seem unreasonable. However, given the relatively large credible interval involved in the Bayesian dating, the breakup of proto-Turkic may also be connected with the first disintegration of the Xiongnu confederation under influence of the military successes of the Chinese in 127-119 BCE (Mudrak 2009). In sum, the time depth of the breakup of Proto-Turkic can be estimated between 500 BCE and 100 CE. Martine Robbeets, Remco Bouckaert, Bayesian phylolinguistics reveals the internal structure of the Transeurasian family, Journal of Language Evolution, Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2018 The language of the European Huns is sometimes referred to as a Bulghar Turkic variety in general linguistic literature, but caution is needed in establishing its affiliations. The predominant part of the Xiongnu population is likely to have spoken Turkic (Late Proto-Turkic, to be more precise). Cite this article: Savelyev A, Jeong C (2020). Early nomads of the Eastern Steppe and their tentative connections in the West. Evolutionary Human Sciences 2, e20, 1-17.
Xiongnu is Turkic 3: Gaoju, apparently, are the remaining branch of the ancient Chidi. Originally they were called "Dili", in the north they are called "Chile", and in China "Gaoju Dinglings", i.e. High Carts Dinglings. Their language is generally similar to the Xiongnu, but sometimes there are small differences. - Book of Wei Wei Shou (4). Book of Wei (History of Northern Wei Dynasty). Peking, Bo-na, 1958, pp. 26a-26b The Gaoche are probably remnants of the ancient Red Di. Initially they had been called Dili. Northerners take them as Chile. Chinese take them as Gaoche Dingling. Their language, in brief, and Xiongnu [language] are the same yet occasionally there are small differences. Or one may say that they [Gaoche] are the junior relatives[18] of the Xiongnu in former times. The Gaoche migrate in search of grass and water. They dress in skins and eat meat. Their cattle and sheep are just like those of the Rouran, but the wheel of their carts are high and have very many spokes. - Weishu, 103 According to the Book of Wei, the Yuebans' language and customs were the same as the Gaoche, who were Turkic speakers. Yuebans(Weak Xiongnu) cut their hair and trimmed their ghee-smeared, sun-dried, glossy eyebrows evenly, and washed before meals three times everyday. Weishu, Vol. 102 " 高車同,而其人清潔於胡。俗剪髮 齊眉以醍醐塗之,昱昱然光澤, 日三澡漱然後飲食。 Tiele are originally Xiongnu's splinter stocks. As Tujue are strong and prosperous, all Tiele districts (EB) are divided and scattered, the masses gradually dwindled and weakened. Until the beginning of Wude [era], there have been Xueyantuo, Qibi, Huihe, Dubo, Guligan, Duolange, Pugu, Bayegu, Tongluo, Hun, Sijie, Huxue, Xijie, Adie, Baixi, etc. scattered in the northern wastelands. - Jiu Tangshu, 199, lower New Book of Tang, vol. 215 upper. "突厥阿史那氏蓋古匈奴北 ." "The Ashina family of the Turk probably were the northern tribes of the ancient Xiongnu." translated by Xu (2005) Old Book of Tang Vol. 199 lower ","tr. "Tiele, originally a splinter race from Xiongnu" Suishu, Vol. 84", Z" tr. "Tiele's predecessors are Xiongnu's ancestors." Jiu Wudai Shi, Chapter 138. Original text: , Ż 種也。後魏時,號爲鐵勒,亦名 回紇。唐元和四年,本國可汗遣 使上言,改爲回鶻,義取迴旋搏 ,. Translation: Hui Hu [Uyghur], originally of Xiongnu stock. During Later Wei, they were called Tiele. They were also called Hui He. In the fourth year of the Yuanhe era, the Khan of their country sent an envoy to submit a request, and the name was changed to Hui Hu. It takes its meaning from turning round to strike rapidly like a falcon.
Amair Khan Mughal Afsharid Khawarazmian Seljuk Timurids Ghazanavid qajar Safavid is from Persia not fucking turkey 🦃and Delhi and Mughal is from Pakistan or India not turkey I love turkey turkey is my brother but these is fake
a good place to die we love each other u asshole. And u guys first get ur facts right before teaching us. Ok tell me what is the shape of earth? It must be flat acc to u. lololololo
Add Ghurids I cannot conclude this head on the Ghorians without mentioning a remarkable passage found in Janabi, who calls the Ghorides Turks, whilst they are generally reckoned to \'91belong to the Afghans; if it" is not, perhaps, to be understood, that only the reigning family Was of a Turkish origin. This passage runs thus :\'97\'93 The \u64257 rst who became known of the Ghorian kings, are the descendants of Hossain; who are a race of Turlcs, that came from Khata to the mountains of Ghor. In the sequel, their affairs prospered; and they possessed themselves of countries, as it is mentioned in the History of As-of Shah, and in the Tarilch Ulmzwader of Ahmed ben Mohammed Altabrizi.\'94 The author of the Khulassat Ulansab, who is very careful in distinguishing the real Afghans from those that are either supposed or erroneously pretend to be Afghans, seems, too, to consider the Ghorian dynasty as a Turkish race: in support of which assertion, I shall insert here a passage relative to this subject :-\'97\'93 History of the Afghans/ Tarikh-i-khan jahani wa makhzan-i-Afghani Translated from the Persian of Neamet Ullah Part of Cambridge Library Collection - Perspectives from the Royal Asiatic Society AUTHOR: Haravi Nimat AllahTRANSLATOR: Bernhard DornDATE PUBLISHED: June 2013AVAILABILITY: Available FORMAT: PaperbackISBN: 9781108056250 www.wdl.org/en/item/3034/view/1/304/ Chronicler: thesaurus.babylon-software.com/Nimat%20Allah%20al-Harawi Original Work: archive.org/details/TarikhEKhanJahaniOMakhzanEAfghaniJildEAwwal-KhwajaNematullahBinKhwajaHabeebullahAl-HarawiFarsi
In the classical Persian literary tradition - the entire vocabulary of which consists of stock phrases and images - "Turk' and 'Tajik' are stand-in terms for easily recognizable social stereotypes: one simple but violent; the other wily but civilized. Rūmi turns this on its head, however, in the following couplet: Attack upon attack came the darkness of night/Be strong like a Turk, not soft like a Tajik' (Yek hamleh va yek hamleh, āmad shab va tārīkī/chosti kon va "Torki' kon, na narmī va ‘Tājīkī'). Often ‘Turk' was also used to refer to the poet's beautiful young e(unattainable) beloved, as in the following lines from Sa'di: 'Maybe they'll tell the King/"Your Turk (i.e., your Beloved) has spilled Tajik blood" (Shayad ke be padshah begüyand/Tork-e tö berikht khūn-e Tājīk), or elsewhere, 'Show your Tajik face, not Abyssinian black/That the Heavens may obliterate the face of the Turks' (Ru-ye Tājīkāna-t benmā, tā dagh-e habash/ Asman chehre-ye Torkān yaghma'i keshad). Since Turkic men often ‘married up’ and started families with Tajik women, the bloodlines tended to become increasingly mixed over the generations. (Recent DNA studies in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan have shown no notable genetic difference between modern Uzbeks and Tajiks.) And since children typically spent their first years within the harem, the influence of Tajik mothers in constructing the identity of their mixed-race children was surely much greater than is admitted in the patriarchal written sources of the time. Military figures in particular often made much of their tough Turkic heritage, even as they sought to demonstrate their own cultivation by speaking Persian and patronizing Persian courtly culture. The Tajik scribes, for their part, were naturally required to flatter their patrons, but they flattered themselves as well in whatever subtle ways they could. - Richard Foltz, Chapter 4, Tajiks and Turks, The Turk-Tajik symbiosis
@Giorno Turks changed all history, idiot. Renaissance, Exploration of America, these are happened just because Ottoman Turks took Silk Road and conquered İstanbul, you can call that as ''Butterfly Effect'' :)
![History of Turkey | Every Month [1071-2021]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CLXujdjNoTY/mqdefault.jpg)
Men ata yurta kalan türklerdenim. Özbek türkuyum. Kandaşlarima selam olsun Özbekistan'dan 🇺🇿
Men ota yurtda qolgan turklardanman. Ōzbek turkiman. Qondoşlarimga salom bōlsin Ōzbekistondan 🇹🇷
Aleyküm Selam Kardeşim
Selam türkistana
As yine hizliyorum işte izliyorum.
Ula sovyetlerden hala dejenere olmamis bir nesil varmis en azindan
Türkiye'den aleykum selam kardasim
Selam aleykum kardeslerim I am from Chuvashia but I want to hear my Turkic brothers around the world, let me hear the voice of all of you!
Hello qardasim from Azer turk
Selam gardaş from turkey
Aleykum salom
Aleyküm selam güzel Kardeşim. Çuvaşistan’da çok çok selamlar sevgiler. Gönlümüzdesiniz her zaman. Allah’a emanet olun. ❤️❤️
Enver Turkanova dont say sekamınaleyküm we are not arab
Greetings to all my Turkic brothers from Bashkir. We are all Turks: from the Crimea to Altai, from Sakha to Cyprus - the Turkic lands. We are all one big family, we all speak the Turkic language. I hope, I believe, I pray that the Turkic World will flourish and gain strength. The Turks of the whole world will unite in a powerful union. Glory to Allah that we are uniting and making friends, despite all the problems and provocations. As they say: water wears away a stone. Sooner or later we will be united. I believe in it.
Long live our Nation!
We are descendants of great people.
We decorate this World.
We are this World.
🇹🇷🇦🇿🇰🇿🇰🇬🇺🇿🇹🇲 + other brothers
🐺☪️
Sooner or later my brother. Love from Turkey🐺☪️
🕎
We will rise again
poland to china
@Bumın Khan in shaa Allah
Hello my Turkic brothers from 🇰🇬,
It's time to built mighty Turkic Kganate back.🇰🇬🇹🇷🇰🇿🇺🇿🇦🇿🇹🇲🙏
All the worst
and who is gonna lead all those nations ? turkey ? ERDOGHAN ?
@@aryakia850 not erdogan.
First of all, you need to get a very good education and read a lot. Then we need to get stronger economically. You also need to be mentally strong. If we do not educate ourselves, there may be well-educated and financially powerful organizations that want to use such a great power. Believe me, these are not well-intentioned. Study hard like the Israelites and read a lot of books.
@@unseliorki1395 yes u r right but i think most important thing is monarchy and military power just like ours history
I'm Nogai Tatar Turk ❤
Mende nogai
hallo tatar turuk
Nerede yaşıyorsun. Kangı ülkedensin
@@canopusyt9961 Kangı ülkedensin gardaş
@Gagavuz Haritacı ben de Tatarım ve Anadolu Türküyüm sen Komrat'tan mısın? :)
Turk was Korea’s neighbour
good old times
We just like to travel. Nothing more.
Turk people just like have no home
@@constantiniasmith4231 But fuck all your ethnicity:) rip your home
@@constantiniasmith4231 like make new home
Turkey: I m alone 08:15
Other turkic countries : No we exist 08:27
Wtf where is azerbaijan?!?!?!
wtf are u talking about They are Turkish and they are friend with Turkey
@@akinaspeedstarso modern turkey people are mixed with aryan and arab,some people did't look turkic people too.they look more aryan russia
@@werapeeverythingthatmove6266 That's not true. Turks did not marry other races.Their appearance has changed due to geography. I hope you understand it.
@@werapeeverythingthatmove6266
ahahaha,idiot.
we did not interfere with the Arabs. Arab lands were in the hands of the Ottomans. but the Turks lived in Anatolia and the Arabs in the Middle East. In the dna tests conducted, no arabic dna was found in the Turks. Turks mixed with the Byzantine Roman peoples in Anatolia. but despite this, we have a central Asian DNA ranging from 5% to 45%. don't talk in the ass without knowing anything.
The term Turkic represents a broad ethno-linguistic group of peoples including existing societies such as Altai, Azerbaijanis, Balkars, Bashkirs, Chuvashes, Crimean Karaites, Gagauz, Karachays, Karakalpaks, Kazakhs, Khakas, Krymchaks, Kyrgyz people, Nogais, Qashqai, Tatars, Turkmens, Turkish people, Tuvans, Uyghurs, Uzbeks, and Yakuts and as well as ancient and medieval states such as Dingling, Bulgars, Alat, Basmyl, Onogurs, Shatuo, Chuban, Göktürks, Oghuz Turks, Kankalis, Khazars, Khiljis, Kipchaks, Kumans, Karluks, Bahri Mamluks, Ottoman Turks, Seljuk Turks, Tiele, Timurids, Turgeshes, Yenisei Kirghiz, and Huns, Tuoba, and Xiongnu.[24][25][26][27][28]
Yaaa sana noldu hesabına😭😭😭
Tureg'in ilk kralına Buman adı verildi. Buman Moğolca bir kelimedir. Moğolcada sonsuz demektir. Tureg, diğer birçok Moğol kralı tarafından yönetildi. örneğin tulan kralı, sintine kralı, tengri kralı, baimei kralı, ijan kralı vb. İlk kral Moğol iken Türklerin hüküm sürdüğü doğru değil. Türkçe konuşan ve yazan Tatarlar Moğollarla bir arada yaşadılar ama Türklerin hepsi bir arada yaşamadı.
LOL şimdi sen Bumin Han ve onun devleti Gokturklerdemi moğol diyorsun? Enee!!!! Geriye ne kaldı amk daha nekadar zayıf ve küçük göreceksiniz
Tatarlar Cuman ve Kıpçaklarin birleşmiş ve Tatar dendi ve ayrıca çoğu Tatarın dili Kıpcakca Turgesh de adından belli Türk sen ve diğer Türk karşıtı kişilikler Geberin kabul etmeyip bizi dünyaya yeterince küçük gösteren ındo-european ve afro asiatic denen soytarı ırklar yüzünden Türklük artık efsane gibi birşey yeni çıkma falan çıktığı gibi yok olma bu ne?!!!! Tarih çocuk masalı değil istediğiniz gibi şekilenmez
🦭
Magyar & Török! 🇭🇺❤🇹🇷 Greetings From Hungary to our Brothers!
Szia testvér! Éljen Attila fiai!🇭🇺❤🇹🇷
God bless Hungary♥️🇭🇺♥️
You guys are turkic too.
Hungarian Turks salute brother
Hungarians are Hun Turks Turkic Brother
Love them or hate them, you would be a fool for denying that they didn’t change history forever. Starting in Siberia and making it to as far as Anatolia is pretty impressive imo.
From Siberia to the heart of Vienna.
Only a fool would think Turk started from Siberia, the Turks were the slaaves of Mongols, who were the original inhabitant of the steppes, it is through the Mongols that Turkish influence spread to Central Asia and the Steppes first through trade. The Turds try to claim the history of all inhabitants of the Steppes as theirs, and in return the Koreans try to claim they are the original Turks, I do not know who should win the first price for historical liars, the Turks who claim the whole history of the steppes when it is not true or the Koreans who claim the history of everyone, including the Turks.
@@red4812 Turks are mongols are not totally different groups. Xiongu was fathers of both and even after seperation they didn't seperated totally. In big Turkic empires there were lots of Mongol tribes and similarly under Genghis Han there were a lot of Turkic tribes. i.e Golden horde considered more Turkic than Mongol. Also there are a lot of common names in both languages, Cengiz(Genghis), Kubilay(Kublai), Kutluk(Qutlugh), Ögeday(Ogeday), Paydar(Baidar) etc.
Hun (xiongnu) people were turks. Turks have founded Xiongnu (hun) empire, but mongols have joined the empire later times. On the other hand, golden horda empire was a union of turks and mongols. This empire was founded by mongols, then turks had got the power of menagement from mongols. Turks and mongols are totally differant races but they have made some unions and confederations because of their common enemies such as china and russia.
Ahmet Demir Austria-Hungary controlled almost all of Central Europe and balkans (which they took from the ottomans). The US is huge and basically it’s own continent, they had a lot of land outside of North America as well such as panama, Caribbean and the Phillipines not to mention it was one of the largest GDP’s and military in the world, Italy under Rome conquered almost all of Europe, Middle East and North Africa. France had almost all of west and North Africa as well as Indochina and much of North America, they also kicked the ottoman’s asses in WW1 and captured much of the Middle East. Napoleon also conquered almost all of Europe as well. Poland-Lithuania conquered the entirely of Eastern Europe from Scandinavia to the Black Sea. Greece ate the entire eastern half of the known world under Alexander the great in under a decade also they too captured much of turkey in the 20th century. Also the ottomans lost twice in Viena after getting their asses beaten by an outnumbered foe. The polish winged Hussars ate the entire ottoman army’s ass for lunch. Comment when you’ve actually won a world war and maybe even recognise the genocide of 3 million Armenians which were force marched into the desert to their death or pushed into the Black Sea to drown by the young Turk retards. It’s been a hundred years maybe you can finally apologise for it.
A Tunisian and a Turk were chatting. Tunisian belittled Atatürk and asked what did Atatürk achieve?
and the Turk replied ;
"I learned French because I wanted it, you learned it out of necessity.Now do you understand what he's accomplished? "
Mustafa Kamâl in devri bitiyor.
@@otonomfilmstudio948
Secimlerde tekmeyi yiyince gorecegiz kimin devri bitiyor :)
@@hannibalbarca2928 Yav he he . Bak Mustafa Kamâl resimleri Apo ile beraber (CHP HDP) olması gerektiği yerde hemde Mustafa'nın kendi partisi .
@@otonomfilmstudio948
Ben chpli değilim.ama o hdpyi meclise alanlarda sizdiniz ne çabuk unuttunuz.
@@otonomfilmstudio948 ayrıca ypg liderini kırmızı hali ile karsilamistiniz ne çabuk unuttunuz :D
Kurdish and Persian nationalists writing too many of the same interpretations doesn't change anything.
Haha thank you brother they just jealous 🤝
Don't mind them they don't have as glorious as history as Turks that is why they are whining in comments.
They barking like a dog lul they just steal our history
@@atc123456789 Türkümğ kıskanıyor puahhaha
@@islamckurt hoşşsssss SG mq kürdü
Love you Turk from Japan
Love you Japan From Türk
Seriously? Rising sun flag? No shame for your war of aggression? This is like Germans using the Swastika(which they don't as they feel shame for their actions and are good people).
We too
Love Japonic peoples from Turkic peoples :)
BANZAİ from Turkey ;)
Salam aleykym from Kyrgyzstan 🇰🇬 Tanri biz menen !
Aleykum selam gardas
Aleyküm selam
My Mongolian history is Great
Beybars Barsbek Aleykum Selam , Tengri ( Allah ) biz Menen 👏🏼🇹🇷🐺🇰🇬
Beybars Barsbek ✊🏻🇰🇬🇰🇬🇰🇬🇰🇬🇰🇬🇰🇬🇰🇬✊🏻
Turks ruled EVERYWHERE bro
Except America and Australia
@@KazakhBoy The Turkic people living in Altai mountains migrated to modern day America 30.000 years ago in the ice-age time using the bearing strait. This is well documented. If you look at the culture of native indians and the culture of Shamanic Turks you will see 99% simiralities
İm sad. Cause we didnt rule britain.d
@@KazakhBoyAustralia is ruled by Asians or specifically aborigines
Turks are best warriors in history but you missed tons of empires anyway
First of them is mamluks
Yes we are number 1 bulding Empires and also destroying them
Fun fact is, considerably more Turkic polities were destroyed by other Turkic polities rather than foreigners.
@Ludvig Hauger Turk and Circassian periods not Arabic
@@Nomadicenjoyerplus kardes siz bir grup falan misiniz yaw bende girmek isterim
Hemmisine yahşi we güzel ömür tileymen.
From East Turkistan.
Özgürlük ve Adalet istiyoruz,Doğu Türkistan için!
Uygurların torunları özgür olacak!
Free East Turkestan 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
kardeşim nasılsın oralar iyi mi çok kötü şeyler duyuyoruz çinle ilgili. türkiyeye gelin kapımız açık her zaman.
@@rylodimadperoksizko5129 evet çok iyiler çinliler hiç katliam yapmiyor
Kardeş ne diyorsun çinliler onlara soykırım yapıyor, hapse atim işkence etip öldürüyorlar, türkistan türkler mücadele ediyor sen onların yerinde olsaydin dayanamazdın
Keşke yardım etsek ama çin bizden kat kat güçlü
O'zbekistondan salomlar, aziz qardoshlar!
Anvarjon Yunusov Aleykum Selam Kardeşim
Selam gardaş
Aleykum selam Ozbek kandasim kardesim
T’urkiyeden sucuklar aziz qardaşım
ve aleykümselam türkiyeden
Turks indeed had a decisive role in triggering historical major events like the Migration Period, Crusades, shaping the history of Balkans, Islamization of Northern India, Age of Discovery as well as ending the Middle Ages with the conquest of Constantinople, fall of the Roman Empire.
Age of Dicovery😂
@@Its-darkdead6 bruuh Persian kids 🤣🤣
islam was thrown out of Northern India by the Maratha and the Sikhs. too bad for you
@@kanhaibhatt913 Pakistan and Bangladesh Keşmir muslim
@@YusufOzdemir-df3bb the weak convert, the strong resist to the end
Greetings from Turkey to the whole Turkish world 🇹🇷🇦🇿🇹🇲🇺🇿🇰🇿🇰🇬
hate Turkey
@@SP.-Iran What's the matter, man?
Tureg'in ilk kralına Buman adı verildi. Buman Moğolca bir kelimedir. Moğolcada sonsuz demektir. Tureg, diğer birçok Moğol kralı tarafından yönetildi. örneğin tulan kralı, sintine kralı, tengri kralı, baimei kralı, ijan kralı vb. İlk kral Moğol iken Türklerin hüküm sürdüğü doğru değil. Türkçe konuşan ve yazan Tatarlar Moğollarla bir arada yaşadılar ama Türklerin hepsi bir arada yaşamadı.
my turkic brothers assalamualeykum. respect from the old khwarezm and Uzbekistan! central Asia!
Fun fact we turks create empires and most of the time another turk destroys it.
aglamak istiyom hahahahhah
Only Turk can destroy Turk
yeah say thanks to fucking Timur
Bu çok doğru değil. Hep devlet yıkma diye anlatılır bizde ama aslolan sadece hükümdarın değişmesidir. Devletler genelde aynı kalır.
Niko Nasirov turk got destroyed by more than turk
So many peraian, kurdish trolls crying in comments.
Well tbf the Seljuk empire was Persian
@@malikabd2902 😅
@@malikabd2902 first of all Seljuk was *RULED* by Turks from present day Turkmenistan, second more mongols are crying about xiongnu and Hunnic empire being Mongol then any other ethnic group
@@leratking8842 it was a turco Persian empire, the Seljuks had their capital in Isfahan Iran and we're as influenced by Persian culture as they were by turkic
@@malikabd2902 İran çoğunlukla Türk'tür. Selçuklu Türklerinin devamı Anadolu Selçuklu'dur. Anadolu Selçuklu da yıkılınca Türk komutanlar beyliklere ayrıldı. Osmanlı ise hepsini yeniden birleştirdi. Osmanlı Selçuklu Türklerinin devamıdır
Love to all Turkic Brothers from Kyrgyzstan!!
Stop admiring genghis khan bi*ch because he is not a TÜRK and he is not our ancestor because he is a mongoli. PS: TURKIC and mongolic are diffrent lenguages races and cultures. And share not the same ancestors.
buiak turklarga salam kazak turkilrrden kultegin tonikok tugulgan kazak turan yurtidan!
Angel Angel aleykum selam kandaşim. Yurtin bizim yurtimiz bizim yurtimiz sizin yurtiniz.
Külteginin ağabeyi Bilge khanı biliyormusunuz
Ve aleykum selam kardeşim.
We especially hope that everyone whose native language belongs to the Turkic languages group will become a true Muslim
@@sobank4743No thank you live your religion yourself don't try to spread it.
Salam, Kirgizstandan!
Selam Türkiyeden🌷
Türkiyeden aleyküm selam
Islam zindabad
Selam kardasim.
Dastan Turatbekov selam karındaş
The reason that the Türks and other Turkic nomads were formidable warriors was that they were horse-archers. A horse-archer specifically denotes a mounted warrior armed with a bow who can shoot from horseback while riding. The Turkic nomadic warriors as well as the Mongols used the composite bow, which was made of horn, wood, and sinew. The composite bow was more accurate and had a better range and rate of fire than muskets and early firearms. The tactical principles of the Turkic horse-archers were based on the combination of fire power and mobility. yhe nomadic horse-archers shot in volleys, weakening the enemy before they charged. Ideally, they practiced "fire power in movement" like modern armies.Other things being equal, the horse-archers were often almost unbeatable on the open battlefields. Against them, sedentary soldiers were often helpless until the development of efficient battlefield handguns, including the repeating firearms (the firearms that could be fired repeatedly before being manually reloaded) in the seventeenth century.
İman gücü var Allah Allah diye koşarız. Bir de Osmanlı Tokatı :)
Sein herberge goruyorum at
Aq*
That and many other factors made them fierce warriors. Not just the fact that they can pew pew while they're on the dıgıdık
🐺🇭🇺🇰🇿🇹🇲🇹🇷🇰🇬🇦🇿🇺🇿🐺
TURKICH PEOPLE
i am a Greek and i believe in Turkish-Greek friendship , all the wars we had on the past doesnt matter shit to me, every leader in this period of time wanted a bigger empire , more food, more gold , more area, this is natural.
Let's respect each other's origins, culture, borders. Greece and Turkey have a long history and we have a lot in common and a lot of differences. Let's all live in Peace.
Peace & Love.
Thecool Inio yes also Turks came to Europe with Huns, later followed by Pechenegs, Cumans First Bulgarians they build empires in the region some of them allied with Roman empire some of the fought later they became a part of the Greek Byzantium empire and fought against Muslim Turks in 1071 lost their identity.
Yeah, who the hell needs war?
Thecool Inio are you greek? Are you sure?😶😶😶😶
Thecool Inio You are cool!
I completely agree with you my Hellenic brother. I hope Hellens and Turks will be good friends again.
Long live Turks! From our brothers, Hungary!
: Hungaryball : love my Hungarian brothers, love from Azerbaijan
: Hungaryball : Thank you! Btw just a correction, you guys are our cousins not brothers. But still, you guys are a part of Uralic-Altaic family. So thanks :D Love Hungary from Turkey
theodoros kolokotronis Turks have more than a hundred states What do the Greeks have?
theodoros kolokotronis the most powerful states of the world are the Turk states.göktürk empire,ottoman empire,seljuks empire,europa hun empire,hun empire,white hun empire,avar empire,aqqoyuns,mamelukes,east hun empire,west hun empire,asia hun empire,uyghur empire,mogol turk empire,golden horde empire,safevid empire the most powerful empires always founded Turks.We Turks like to read history but our main duty is to write history.
Theodoros Kolokotronis We recommend reading the kürşad, which attacked the chinese palace of 5000 people with 40 people and saved their relative.kürşad's china rescued from his palace brother established east gokturk state.your sources for kürşad's name is Chieh-she-shuai
Iran azarbaycan turklerdenem, turk qardashlarima salamlar, tarimiz bizi bir gun bir yere yigajax , BOYUK TURKUSTAN quraciyux.
Aynen gardaş fuck iran
@@alparslanosmangokturkoglu2366 olm niye fuck iran diyorsun. adamların iranla alıp veremedikşeri yokki. İranda hayet normal vatandas statusundeler. ayrıca oradaki azeri-türkmenler sever ve desteklerler devletlerini. muhalifleri de vardır da farsilerde de var o.
Evet DP FGC hakli
@@RetroArayuz aynen öyle tek sorun farsilerin Türklüğü 1000 yıldır düşman olarak görmeleri Türk birliğine karşı iran farsi yönetimi
Birgün!
raged kurds and persian Nationalists in the comments
however, they come to these countries to work for 3 cents of money. Let them have a little fun.
Don't forget jealous Arabs.
@@Ambrosia- turkish people are arabs
im from greece,i like to read history such turk,chinise,greek,agypt,romans.All we have to respect each other
that comment made my day. Thank u man
respect
George Ts you are right but what about cyprus?
Baran Yalçın the Aegean Islands are pure Greek. No debate there. But seriously you need to get rid of Erdocunt, he is destroying you with propaganda and disrespecting the turkic culture. Greetings
Arda Baştürk I'm so glad you understand. I'm a Greek but we don't warn you guys because we want to destroy you. We are not saying that erdogan is destroying you as an enemy. We are saying that as neighbors who want peace. You need to get rid of him before he starts sending your families in prison. My fellow greetings
Kırım Tatar Kıpçak turklerinden tüm Turan a selam olsun
ve aleyküm selam
The first Turkic-speaking community appeared between 7,000 BC. and 5,000 BC. in South Central Asia (in today's Turkmenistan, near the Iranian border), namely Anav culture. Part of this community remained in this area until around 1,000 BC. while another part of the community around 4,000 BC. was distributed in the northern part of Central Asia and another part was distributed in regions such as Mesopotamia and Anatolia. The name of one of these communities in Anatolia and Mesopotamia was even called Turukku.
On the other hand, as has been recently pointed out, though the beginning of Bahri rule is usually dated to 1250, none of the first five sultans were, in fact, members of the Bahriyya. 32 The Arabic sources for the period refer to the dynasty as the dawlat al-atrak, dawlat al-turk, or al- dawla al-turkiyya (i.e. dynasty of the Turks), in recognition of the racial or ethnic group which predominated in the mamluk caste during this period, and to distinguish it from the Burji sultanate in which mamluks
Northrup, L. (1998). The Bahrī Mamlūk sultanate, 1250-1390. In C. Petry (Ed.), The Cambridge History of Egypt (The Cambridge History of Egypt, pp. 242-289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521471374.011
The Mamlūks in Egypt and Syria: the Turkish Mamlūk sultanate (648-784/ 1250-1382) and the Circassian Mamlūk sultanate (784-923/1382-1517) amalia levanoni The Turkish era of the Mamlūk sultanate The Mamlūks’ rise to power: a decade of trial and error The Arabic term mamlūk literally means ‘owned’ or ‘slave’, and was used for the white Turkish slaves of pagan origins, purchased from Central Asia and the Eurasian steppes by Muslim rulers to serve as soldiers in their armies.
Levanoni, A. (2010). The Mamlūks in Egypt and Syria: The Turkish Mamlūk sultanate (648-784/1250-1382) and the Circassian Mamlūk sultanate (784-923/1382-1517). In M. Fierro (Ed.), The New Cambridge History of Islam (The New Cambridge History of Islam, pp. 237-284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521839570.010
The term 'Mamluk Sultanate' is a modern historiographical term.[9] Arabic sources for the period of the Bahri, Mamluks refer to the dynasty as the State of the Turks (Arabic: دولة الاتراك, Dawlat al-Atrāk; دولة الترك, Dawlat al-Turk) or State of Turkey (الدولة التركية, al-Dawla al-Turkiyya).[16][17][9]
In the obituary notices about Niẓām al-Mulk the fact that he drew his power and authority from the thousands of Turkish Mamlūks he possessed (kathrat mamālikihi; wa-malaka min ghilman al-Atrāk ulūfan) is clearly stated. See al-Athir, Ibn, al-Ta’rikh al-Bāhir fi al-Dawla(Cairo, 1963), p. 10;Google Scholar and Abū Shāma, who cites Nizām al-Mulk’s contemporary or near-contemporary, the historian Muhammad b. ‘Abd al-Malik al-Hamdānī, who died early in the sixth/twelfth century (Kitāb al-Rawdatayn,Cairo, 1288H, i, p. 26).Google ScholarFor more detail see “Aspects of the MamlⅫk phenomenon”, pp. 213-14. TheSiyāsat-nāma certainly reflects Nizām al-Mulk's personal attitude to the Turkish Mamlūks and the spirit of the time, even if it was edited after his death.
When the ‘Abbāsid Caliphs were under Buwayhid suzerainty their Mamlūk policy was not free from the pressure of that Daylamite dynasty. The success of the Daylamite soldiers in so many eastern armies is really astounding, but in the slightly longer run they stood no chance against the Turkish Mamlūks, and they disappeared. Even a Buwayhid ruler preferred Turks over them (see e.g.Bosworth, , “Ghaznevid military organisation”, p. 42;Google ScholarAyalon, , “On the eunuchs…”, p. 109Google Scholar).
41
I have already pointed out, in “Egypt as a dominant factor …”, pp. 30-1Google Scholar, some of the reasons which prevented the Mamlüks from taking real root under the Fātimids. There I mentioned especially the fact that, on moving from the Maghrib to Egypt, much of their ruling and military systems had already been crystallized, and they could not replace, or at least replace properly, the already existing and most powerful military bodies. Another factor which I referred to there was the great distance separating Egypt from the Turkish Mamlüks” homeland, which was, in addition to that, cut off from Egypt by mainly Sunnite states hostile to the Fātimids. (The antagonism of the Seljuks to the acquisition of Turkish Mamlüks by the Sunnite al-Muqtafī must have been at least as strong in the case of the Fātimids. This, coupled with the much greater distance of Egypt from the sources of supply, illustrates well the obstacles which the Fātimids faced in forming a proper Mamlük army.) Yet another major factor was the very inadequate military schools of the Fātimids, when they had them (I discuss this aspect in my book on the eunuchs). The impossibility of the Mamlük system (with the Turkish Mamlüks at its heart) developing under the Fātimids as it should, was clearly demonstrated in the second half of the fourth/tenth century, as soon as its great protagonist al-'Aziz billāh died (386/996), that is to say, quite soon after their occupation of Egypt. That was one of the reasons why their hold on Syria was even then not strong enough. With the later appearance of the Seljuks and the Crusaders that hold, without a further military force, could not but become more precarious. Note also the military feats of the Turkish Mamlük contingent which Saladin sent in 568/1172-3 to the Maghrib (“Aspects of the Mamlük phenomenon”, part B, pp.12-13Google Scholar).
2. Kitāb Tarjamat thaghr Dimyāṭ al-maḥrūs wa-mā waqaʻa bihā min ʻahd Nūḥ ʻalayhi al-salām ilá ākhir dawlat al-Turk min Kitāb al-ʻAnāṣir li-majālis al-Malik al-Nāṣir : manuscript, [1567] ; Tarjamat thaghr Dimyāṭ al-maḥrūs wa-mā waqaʻa bihā min ʻahd Nūḥ ʻalayhi al-salām ilá ākhir dawlat al-Turk ; Thaghr Dimyāṭ al-maḥrūs wa-mā waqaʻa bihā min ʻahd Nūḥ ʻalayhi al-salām ilá ākhir dawlat al-Turk ; كتاب ترجمة ثغر دمياط المحروس وما وقع بها من عهد نوح عليه السلام الى آخر دولة الترك من كتاب العناصر لمجالس الملك الناصر : مخطوطة، [1567] ; ترجمة ثغر دمياط المحروس وما وقع بها من عهد نوح عليه السلام الى آخر دولة الترك من كتاب العناصر لمجالس الملك الناصر ; ثغر دمياط المحروس وما وقع بها من عهد نوح عليه السلام الى آخر دولة الترك من كتاب العناصر لمجالس الملك الناصر
CREATOR/CONTRIBUTOR:
Maqrīzī, Aḥmad ibn ʻAlī, 1364-1442, creator
مقريزي، أحمد بن علي،, 1364
al-Malik al-Muẓaffar Sayf al-Dīn al-Muʿizzī , third Mamlūk sultan of the Dawlat al-Turk or Baḥrī dynasty. A nephew of the K̲h̲wārazm-S̲h̲āh D̲j̲alāl al-Dīn, Ḳuṭuz (whose original Muslim name was Maḥmūd b. Mamdūd) was taken prisoner by the Mongols and sold to a Damascus merchant who, in turn, sold him to the Mamlūk amīr Aybak in Cairo. Aybak, as the husband of S̲h̲ad̲j̲ar al-Durr, became in 648/1250 al-Malik al-Muʿizz, from which title Ḳuṭuz derived his nisba , al-Muʿizzī.
The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Political Theory
Leigh K. Jenco, Murad Idris, Megan C. Thomas · 2019 · Political Science
The lens of mamlūk military slavery has dominated studies of medieval Egypt. ... dynasty (established by Salāh al-Dīn in the twelfth century) to the Turkish Mamluk sultanate in the mid-thirteenth century.
The Oxford Encyclopedia of Medieval Warfare and Military Technology
Clifford J. Rogers, William Caferro, Shelley Reid · 2010 · History
In general, the Mamluk Sultanate was referred to at the time as the “Turkish state” or “dynasty” ( dawlat al-turk/atrak).
In this period the emergence of the Ottoman Turkish dynasty challenged what remained of the Byzantine Empire, eventually absorbing the other Turkish domains in Anatolia, while the Turkic Mamluk Empire
“The Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries: Emergence of the Ottomans.” Ottoman Dress and Design in the West: A Visual History of Cultural Exchange, by Charlotte A. Jirousek and Sara Catterall, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, USA, 2019, pp. 41-78.
Mamlūk authors almost always refer to their Sultanate as " the state of the Turks " ( dawlat al - atrāk dawlat al - turk/ al - dawla al - turkiyya ) . They usually seem to be aware of the fact that the reign of the “ Turks "
Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam,Volume 39
Magnes Press, The Hebrew University., 2012
The Mamluks (whose name denotes their slave status) were a quintessential Turkic military dynasty.
Spannaus, Nathan. “HISTORY AND CONTINUITY: AL-AZHAR AND EGYPT.” Modern Islamic Authority and Social Change, Volume 1: Evolving Debates in Muslim Majority Countries, edited by MASOODA BANO, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2018, pp. 79-101.
What they did not know was that with Baybars, a new Turkish dynasty would unify the Islamic Middle East with an uncompromising commitment to jihad not seen since the days of Saladin
“BETWEEN THE MAMLUKS AND THE MONGOLS: 1250-1260.” Accursed Tower: The Crusaders' Last Battle for the Holy Land, by ROGER CROWLEY, Yale University Press, NEW HAVEN; LONDON, 2019, pp. 40-50.
He ended up assassinating the leading Mameluks, the Turkish dynasty that had held power since the 13th century.
“Of Egypt and Levantine Plagues.” Free Trade’s First Missionary: Sir John Bowring in Europe and Asia, by Philip Bowring, Hong Kong University Press, 2014, pp. 73-82.
bunca kaynağı nasıl buluyorsunuz?
Selamun aleyküm kardeş birşey diyecemde tipin çok efsooo yözkat lımısın
@@suleimanthemagnificent1494 nasıl acaba 🐸
@@papazataklaattiranimam Allah Allah ya🤔
Turan🐺 🇰🇿❤️🇹🇷
Turan yalnız bu ikisinden ibaret deil
Rusça konuşmayı bırakın
Siz Rus olmayın Turan
Biz kazakca konusmus, rusca degil, kazak turkcesi mangi 🇰🇿🇹🇷✊
@@cuntdoku siz de arapça konuşmayı
I LOVE YOU TURKS! I'M FROM KAZAKHSTAN!
you are turk too...
Kardaş sen de Türksün
Spinosaurus Maroccanus most are Turks and some are Slavic and Mongol people
phuck y'all What the fuck are you saying ? They're not slavic people, they are altaic people (turkic, mongolic and tungusic)
Zeng Khan 回族 so you tell me there are no mongols and slavs in Kazakhstan?!? Tell me I am wrong?
In short, it is hard to think of any other ethnolinguistic entity in history that conquered so vast a territory and founded so many empires and states, also contributing to world civilizations. The history of the Turkic peoples was an important factor in world history for more than a millennium until the emergence of Europe as the world's dominant power. What happened in the Turkic world often affected the history of China, Central Asia, the Middle East, South Asia, and Europe. One may also argue that world history began with the "Turko-Mongol" empire created by Chinggis Khan. In the contemporary world, Turkic-speaking nations form six states (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, and Turkey/Türkiye) and several "autonomous" units in Russia (the republics of Chuvash, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Altai, Khakassia, Tuva, and Sakha) and China (the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region). Turkic peoples also reside as minority groups in several other countries, including Mongolia and Iran, among others. It would therefore be difficult to acquire a comprehensive understanding of world history as well as our present world without studying the history of the Turkic peoples.
这些土地都是荒芜且寒冷的土地
只能用来放牧
在古代没人想占领
Otistik misin
Être fort comme un Turc (‘to be strong like a turk’):
This expression originates in the 15th century when the Turks had a reputation for being strong, almost unbeatable warriors due to their numerous victories. At the time, the Ottoman Empire ruled large parts of south-east Europe, north Africa and western Asia. It is said that François I, King of France, was gifted Turkish armour by Suleiman the Magnificent (the tenth and most famous sultan of the Ottoman Empire) during their alliance. When he wore it, he is said to have exclaimed: “Here I am now, strong as a Turk!”.
Bütün türk tarih videolarının yorumlarında varsın knk hdkslsşzzlx
Otistik misin
Gretting Mighty Turks ! Grettings and respect from Finlanddd !
West mongolia is best mongalia !
Grafhindolf my ural brothers 10 years ago brothers
Finland is best land
We love you Finland
Grafhindolf Thanks,finland
Long live Turkey🇹🇷
çok yaşa Türkiye🇹🇷
from Japan🇯🇵
Japonyadan🇯🇵
ゆうた1727 thank you bro respect good peoples Japan 🙂
@@kartalkara7345
You are welcome.
どういたしまして。
Long live Nippon🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵
@@anonymous2580
Long live Türkiye.🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
Respect to Japanese People
The Italian traveler Pietro della Valle, who visited the Safavid Empire during the reign of Shah Abbas I, wrote that the only information in the state was the military elite, who monopolized all the posts of provincial governors and most important positions since the Safavid rule in the early 16th century. He also described that the Persians lived under the intolerable enslavement of the Turkomans.
*In Iran entered a period of relative obscurity and seclusion under
two dynasties of Turkish origin: the Safavids and the Qajars.[1]
*The Safavids were of Turkish descent..[2]
*As with their Safavid predecessors, the new dynasty was of Turkish origin ;
and administrative institutions similar to those the Safavids had attempted to build up were revived.[3]
*There was a real need for the Safavids to disassociate themselves from their
arch-foes by playing down their own Turkish origins.[4]
*The Divan of Shah İsmail, the founder of the Safavid Dynasty was written in Turkish,,
because he was of Turcoman origin.[5]
*The Safavids (1501-1722), two major dynasties of Turkish origin.[6]
*The modern history of Persia really begins with the rise of the SAFAVID dynasty in 1500.
Although these rulers were also Turkish in origin, they espoused the SHITTE form of Islam and established a state.[7]
*The Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal Empires. Though political and ideological rivals,
all three empires were of Turkic origin and belonged to the same Persianate cultural universe.[8]
*Form of Shi'ism under pressure from the Safavids, originally a Turkic Sufi order who were themselves former Sunnis.[9]
*The three Islamic empires of the early modern period - the Mughal, the Safavid, and the Ottoman -
shared a common Turko-Mongolian heritage.[10]
*Safavid power with its distinctive Persian-Shi‘i culture, however, remained a middle ground between
its two mighty Turkish neighbors. The Safavid state, which lasted at least until 1722,
was essentially a "Turkish" dynasty, with Azeri Turkish (Azerbaijan being the family's home base)
as the language of the rulers and the court as well as the Qizilbash military establishment.[11]
*Under the Safavids, the Azeri Turks came into conflict with the expanding Ottoman Turks[12]
*A massive migration of Oghuz Turks in the l lth and l2th centuries not only Turkified Azerbaijan
but also Anatolia. The Azeri Turks are Shi'ites and were founders of the Safavid dynasty.[13]
*The modern history of Persia really begins with the rise of the *Safavid Dynasty in 1500.
Although these rulers were also Turkish in origin, they espoused the Shi'ite form of Islam.[14]
*The Caucasus was a battleground between the Sunni Ottoman Empire and the Turkic Shia Safavid Dynasty of Persia.[15]
*Shah Isma'il I (1500-24), the founder of the Safavid dynasty of Azeri origin, made the Shi'a branch of Islam.[16]
*This family, reported by some sources to be of Azerbaijani origin[17]
*Three major Islamic empires emerged, all with Turkic roots to varying degrees: those of the
Ottomans (1300-1922), Safavids (1501-1722), and Moghuls (1526-1858).[18]
*The Ottoman eastward expansion was stalled by the rise of another Turkish dynasty, the Safavids, in Persia.[19]
*The Safavid Turks, who had their genesis in a Shia dervish order in Azerbaijan.[20]
*Selim I captured the Capital Tebriz also and thus put a check on the growth of the military power of the Safavid Turks.[21]
* “gunpowder empires”: the Empire of the Ottoman Turks (centered in Turkey),
that of the Safavid Turks (centered in Iran or Persia)[22]
*Discuss the religious and political issues that separated the Ottoman Turks and the Safavid Turks.[23]
*See Ottoman Empire; Safavid Turks Turks, 10 revolt against, 225 Safavid, 30 Twelver branch.[24]
* In the early 16th century, the Azeri dynasty of the Safavids ( r. 1501-1736 )
took power in Tabriz and developed a culture that influenced much of the region.[25]
*Of three great empires: the Mughals in South Asia, the ?afavids in Persia, and the Ottomans in the west.
The three empires shared basic features such as Turkic dynastic origins.[26]
*What most Iranians are not told (neither by the Shia clergy nor ultra-Iranian nationalits)
is how the Turkic Safavids slaughtered thousands upon thousands of Persians (Sunnis),
starting with the elite, the thinkers and scholars.[27]
*The rule of the Turkic Safavids completed the process of linguistic Turkicisation
of modern Azerbaijanis which was initiated by the Seljuks in the eleventh century.[28]
*Buyids (Iranian) (945-1055) . Ghaznavids (Turkic) (994-1030) . Seljuks (Turkic) (1045-1217) .
Mongol/Ilkhanid Dynasties (Turkicized Mongols) (1221-1338) .
Timurids and Turkmen (Turkic) (1383-1501) . Safavids (Turkic) (1501-1722)[29]
* Although arising from a local, originally Sunni Sufi order in Azerbaijan,
the Turkish Safavids speedily became the vigorous upholders of Shi'ism.[30]
*The Safavid and Qajar dynasties,rulers in Iran from 1501 to 1722 and from
1795 to 1925 respectively,were Turkic in origin[31]
*Understands political achievements of the Safavid and Mughal Empires
,how Persia was unified by the Turkic Safavids.[32]
*Therefore, the student is able to: 5-12 Explain the unification of Persia under the Turkic Safavids.[33]
*To bolster its legitimacy, the Turkish Safavid dynasty created the fiction of an ancestral link.[34]
*The Turkic origin of the Safavid dynasty,which is rarely acknowledged in u conventional Turkish nationalist historiography.[35]
*Shah Ismail, a Turk of the Shi'i sect of Islam, arose as leader of both Turkic and Iranian
adherents of this sect, who placed more emphasis upon religion than upon ethnic origin.[36]
* The Safavids were originally Turkic, ghazis like the Osmanlis and succeeded, like them, in distancing possible rivals.[37]
* The Safavids were descended from a family of Turkmen Sufi sheikhs from Ardabil, in Azerbaijan.[38]
* In the early 1500s, a thirteen-year-old Turkmen named Ismail, who lived in western Iran, conquered the whole country[39]
* Yet even Iran's foreign conquerors - such as the Turkic Safavid, Afshar, and Qajar dynasties.[40]
Sources:
*1-Women, Religion and Culture in Iran
*2-World History DeMYSTiFieD Stephanie Muntone McGraw Hill Professional-Page 238
*3-Modern Persian Prose Literature-Page 9
*4-Comparative History of Civilizations in Asia: 10,000 B.C. to 1850 Edward L. Farmer Westview Press-Page 430
*5-Cultural Horizons: A festschrift in honor of Talat S. Halman,Volume 1 Jayne L. Warne Syracuse University Press, 2001
*6-Women's History in Global Perspective,Volume 3-Page 82
*7-New Catholic Encyclopedia: A-Azt-Page 140
*8-The Eckstein Shahnama: An Ottoman Book of KingsWill Kwiatkowski Sam Fogg,2005-Page 9
*9-Religions of Iran: From Prehistory to the Present-Page 192
*10-Safavid, Mughal,and Ottoman Empires(Cambridge University Press)
*11-Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective(Cambridge University Press)-Page 86-87.
*12-Global Security Watch-The Caucasus States-Page 3
*13-Iran II: Iranian history - Iran V: Peoples of Iran,Volume 3 Ehsan Yarshater
The Encyclopaedia Iranica Foundation,2006-Page 325
*14-New Catholic Encyclopedia-Volumr 1.-18.-Page 16
*15-Caucasus:Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide-Page 3
*16-Eastern Europe, Russia and Central Asia 2003-Page 104
*17-Azerbaijan, Mosques, Turrets, Palaces Ilona Turánszky Corvina Kiadó,1979-Page 21
*18-The Turks in World History(Oxford University Press)-Page 94
*19-Conflict, Conquest, and Conversion: Two Thousand Years of Christian Missions
in the Middle East(Columbia University Press)
*20-The Rising Tide of Cultural Pluralism: The Nation-state at Bay?(Univ of Wisconsin Press)
*21-Proceedings of the All Pakistan Political Science Conference,Volume
*22-Expansion and Global Interaction, 1200-1700 David R. Ringrose Longman,2001-Page 135
*23-Student Study Guide and Map Exercise Workbook to accompany Traditions and Encounters,Volume 2
BENTLEY McGraw-Hill Companies,Incorporated
*24-The Politics of the Middle East Monte Palmer F.E. Peacock Publishers,2002-Page 425
*25-Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture: Three-Volume Set(Oxford University Press)-Page 236
*26-The Oxford Encyclopedia of Islam and Politics Emad Eldin Shahin, ?Peri J. Bearman, ?Sohail H. Hashmi - 2014
*27-Son of Sunnah-Persian Sunni scholars VS the King of the Safavids
*28-Routledge Handbook of the Caucasus
*29-Christianity in Persia and the Status of Non-Muslims in Modern Iran-Page 275
*30-Encyclopaedia of Islam Ian Richard Netton-Page 570
*31-Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Africa and the Middle East-Page 707
*32-Content knowledge: a compendium of standards and benchmarks for K-12 education
John S. Kendall, Robert J. Marzano Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory,1996-Page 243
*33-National standards for history National Center for History in the Schools (U.S.),
Charlotte Antoinette Crabtree, Gary B. Nash-Page 180
*34-Government and Politics of the Contemporary Middle East: Continuity and change-Page
*35-New Perspectives on Turkey,36-37.-Page 230
*36-The Middle East and South Asia,Stryker-Post Publications,1968-Page 10
*37- The History of the World JJohn Morris Roberts, Odd Arne Westad
(Oxford University Press)-Page 403
*38-The Safavids and their Successors - The David Collection
*39- Iran the People - Page 10
*40- Iran and the world: continuity in a revolutionary decade(Indiana University Press)-Page 11
I'm Turk from Iran
Ben Iran Türk'üyüm selam olsun bütun Türk'lere
Teimour Moghanloo aleyküm selam
Why are you in Iran?
Österreich I thought OP was Turkish
Österreich I'm from Iran and Khorasan.But we are not turkish...
a littel peoples from Khorasan are turkaman.Maby 2mil of 13 mil
فرازمان جهانبخش چون تو ایران ترک زیاد داریم
Men Orto Aziya Turkiman!
Timur Joro menem Orta Asiya Türkmen ema atalarym anadolu ya köch diler, sana salam bolsyn Allah biz bilen amin.
Timur Joro
Ben Orta Asya Türk'üyüm
Cenk Özkan iiiyyyy o resim ne öyle
Kültegin Batyr
Ne resmi
Cenk Özkan profil resmin ........
"Your land is either colonized and replaced by Turk, Or ruled by the Turks as your kings of elites"
Elijah Oliver Dickenson (a British officer from India British Raj and a historian of Turkic culture)
Pretty accurate.
Turks are either your kings or your replacers of population.
The Mughals (1526-1858) lost control of India in the 1700s, but many of the local rulers who replaced them were also Turks, at least until the British took over.
Chase, K. (2003). Conclusion. In Firearms: A Global History to 1700 (pp. 197-210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511806681.009
@@pompacitokmakci On a VERY unrelated note.
You'll appreciate this Yoruk quote.
"We migrated to Anatolia because God told us so, and we migrated to Anatolia because God made his garden here"
Yoruk Proverb
@@noahtylerpritchett2682 I'm a pure Yoruk yoruks migrated Anatolia because Central steppes are poor and Turks were overpopulated in Central Asia
@@pars-efe3543 purity doesn't exist. Every race is a formation of mix racing which created new races.
What a history! They owned everything !
The backbone and most umportant part of the Mongol army were Turks, Cengiz and han are Turkish words and names. The mongols simply didnt have enough manpower to create the biggest empire in the history it was the Turks
Birader tarih ve gerceklerde "yersiz" diye bir gtanim yok sadece gercekler, Mogol ordusunun neredeyse tamami Turklerden olusmaktaydi Mogollar'in yeterli insan gucu yoktu.
@@vitalalive69 Pseudo-history
@@vitalalive69 cengizin ordusunda türk de vardı ama ordusu tamamen türk değildi. Moğollar da türkler gibi göçebe olduğundan savaş tarzları birbirine benzer.
@@iskambillordu Cengiz han in ordusunun 70%-80% türk olduklari tahmin ediliyor. Zaten mogollar kücük bir toplumdu eger cengiz hanin nasil hükümdar oldugunu arastirirsan zaten türk devletlerini birlestirdigini anlarsin.
Yenisey Kirghiz. I am kyrgyz, and I am proud to be Kyrgyz. Long live to Turks people!
You Tube why do Turks at central asia call them as kazakh , kyrgyz or uzbek ? At least you can call yourself Kazakh Turks , Uzbek Turks or Kyrgyz Turks
Leave Alone that's good question
They are already called like that. Both terms are used ( kazakh - kazakh turk; uzbek- uzbek turk etc.) But it's shorter and hence easier to say kazakh, krygyz ,azeri etc. No need to add "turk" to the end cuz everybody will understand that when u say kazakh, you mean the turks living in central asia in their own state called Kazakhistan etc. :)
Dogan Cetinkal when we talk about our ethnic we call Turk but when they talk about their ethnic they call theirself kazakh , uzbek etc and it seems we are different people
Yep, we all are originally same (Turk), but of course time, region and interaction with neighbours have affected and changed cultures by time. Hence Uzbek, Kazakh, Azerbayjani, Turks (Turks in Turkey) etc. all are different people for sure but they are all Turkic people and nations and have many in common.
I m proud to be Turk 🇹🇷
Greetings to all Turk brothers and sisters from Turkey 🇹🇷🇦🇿🇰🇬🇰🇿🇺🇿🇹🇲
TURAN ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️💪💪💪💪💪
Tureg'in ilk kralına Buman adı verildi. Buman Moğolca bir kelimedir. Moğolcada sonsuz demektir. Tureg, diğer birçok Moğol kralı tarafından yönetildi. örneğin tulan kralı, sintine kralı, tengri kralı, baimei kralı, ijan kralı vb. İlk kral Moğol iken Türklerin hüküm sürdüğü doğru değil. Türkçe konuşan ve yazan Tatarlar Moğollarla bir arada yaşadılar ama Türklerin hepsi bir arada yaşamadı.
Turkish from Anatolian peninsula are more Persian than Turk sorry to disappoint
Macaristan Nerde?
Best history in history=Turk history but you missed many states anyway...
tarihimiz çok köklü ve ihtişamlı olduğundan fars , moğol yunan gibi tarihte üzdüğümüz bazı azınlıklar tarihimizi bölmeye , sahiplenmeye çalışıyor.
I'm a Kazakh/Turk and I find this video very helpful
🇰🇿🇦🇿🇰🇬🇺🇿🇹🇲🇹🇷💪🏻💪🏻
Sexy Tomato Hello From Anatolia
Hello i am frim france is turks empire big and awsome !
JustAgame la olm kimi kandıryon turksun biliyoz videolarin turkce xd
türkçe yazsana :D
Sexy Tomato Hello from taşkent
Salam Özbekdan! Yaşa Türkiy millat va Türk askar! 🇦🇿🇰🇿🇰🇬🇹🇲🇺🇿🇹🇷
Aleykum selam kandas
Aleyküm selam kardeşim
CD AB speak turkish pls
My Mongolian history is great
Enkhjargal Hatantuul we are cousin Mongolian And Turks
Dünyadaki bütün Türklere selam olsun.
Tanrı Türk'ü Korusun.
🇹🇷 🇦🇿 🇹🇲 🇰🇬 🇰🇿 🇺🇿
Tureg'in ilk kralına Buman adı verildi. Buman Moğolca bir kelimedir. Moğolcada sonsuz demektir. Tureg, diğer birçok Moğol kralı tarafından yönetildi. örneğin tulan kralı, sintine kralı, tengri kralı, baimei kralı, ijan kralı vb. İlk kral Moğol iken Türklerin hüküm sürdüğü doğru değil. Türkçe konuşan ve yazan Tatarlar Moğollarla bir arada yaşadılar ama Türklerin hepsi bir arada yaşamadı.
@@user-sw6ip2hk5w (Asya Hun imparatorluğu, Göktürk İmparatorluğu Türklerin bir arada olduğu imparatorlukları) Türklerin ilk dini Tengri ve bu dini 2000 yıl öncede kullanıyordu Türkler
What do ancient Turkic writers and philosophers say about their history?
"Timur had not captured anyone from the people of Anatolia after the Battle of Ankara. Because the state he was fighting was also a Turk state. He remained loyal to the tradition, which had the understanding that a Turk would not be a prisoner. "
-Ducas, Byzantine History, p.174
Esir almamasının sebebi neredeyse tüm beylikler Timurun yanında yer aldı. Neden esir alsın. Karatatarlar ve Karamanlılar başta..
I am Yenisei Kyrgyz !
So are you Khakass?
@@blgram No i am Kyrgyz !
Okay you are Yrnisei Kyrgyz Turk
I know Cengiz Aytmatov 🌷 Cengiz ağabeyden bilirim Kırgız kültürünü . selam Türkiye Türklerinden
Ramazan Bilgin Khakasses were also part of the Yenisei Kyrgyz
salam uigurlardan!
Aleyküm selam 👋☺️
Aleyküm selam gardaş
Türkiyeden Sergiler ❤ ve Selamlar.👋
Selam
this video is joke turk have not history
As an Albanian i love learning about Turkic History
Thank you albanian brother 💜🌹
Kosovo is albania 🇦🇱🇽🇰🇹🇷
@@burhanklc2 Kurdistan is Turkish 🇦🇱❤️🇹🇷💪🏻
@@Himes5564 there are some Turks who said that recently
@@Albania_is_W Kurdistan is Kurdish
Modu Chanyu was the second ruler (“chanyu” in Ancient Chinese sources - 單于) of Xiongnu, a nomadic Empire situated in East-Central Asia. He reigned between 209-174 BC. As far as we interpret from the Chinese sources, at least we know that his title is Turkic: 冒頓單于 Modu Chanyu or 撐犁孤塗單于 (chengli gutu chanyu)- transliterated as “Tengri Qutluğ Yabgu?”.(The translation of the chanyu is somewhat disputed, some Turkologists claim “Chanyu” is “Tarkan” another Turkic title, it could be “yabgu”, or maybe “tanhu”- there is no general consensus). The first two words are certainly Turkic, “Tengri” is Turkic for god, and Qutluğ is “blessed” implying the bearer of the title as “blessed by the God”. (In today’s modern Turkish language, “Tengri Qutluğ” would be “Tanrı kutlu”)
We can say that the Modu Chanyu certainly had Turkic titles, so most probably, yes, he was Turkic. Back then, the region was inhabited by speakers of the Proto-Turkic language.
單于(old Chinese tar-gwa) is Tarkan for sure.
ben iran türküyüm . herkese selamlar . yaşasın qardaşlarım 😍
mohsen gh selam 👋
Hayır her türk kanı taşıyan kişi türk
Emre Yilmaz iran turkleri var sadece bagımsız ilıklarını ilan etmediler tıpkı uygur ve rusyadaki turkler gibi
@Emre Yilmaz siktir
Emre Yilmaz Haklısın kardeşim yüzde yüz
Baardyk turk elderine salam KIRGHIZ adamdan !!!!!!
Самат Толомушов KIRGHIZ A SELAM
Selam
Ve aleyküm selâm ve rahmetullah. . .
Banda kırgızbay
Turkic people have a proud and old history. I'm not a Turk btw, I'm of Germanic/Scandinavian origin. 🤙
Nordic peoples too👍
Like William the Conqueror,Gustavus Adolphus great Nordic warriors
RevanX this video is has real as Turkic history 😂😂😂 this video is joke just like Turkic history 😂😂 Turkic peoples also believe that Mongolic rulers like Timur , Batu Khan and others and Iranic rulers like Shah Ismail , Muhammad of Ghor and others were Turkic 😂😂😂 every body knows Turkic history is joke compare to Iranic history Turkic peoples brave ??? 😂😂😂 only First Iranic and Turkic war > all Turkic war 🤣🤣🤣 when Bahram Chobin beat 300,000 Turkic peoples in many battles like in battle of Hyrcanian rock and won war with only 12,000 WON WAR is sister Gordiya beat Turkic warriors and champions 🤣 🤣🤣 Iranic peoples ruled Turkic peoples most of time for example big part of Turkic peoples are under Iranic peoples in Afghanistan since the time of Ahmed Shah Durrani LOL that 250 years Turkic peoples were slav*** of Iranic warriors and military commanders like Abu Muslim , Saladin , Muhammad of Ghor , Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad , Khaydhar ibn Kawus al-Afshin , Mardavij, Ismail Samanid and many more form the time of Abu Muslim to the time of Samanid empire Turkic peoples were slav*** of Iranians and Arabs specially Iranic peoples 🤣🤣 more than 150 years Turkic peoples run away form Abu Muslim to Tang Dynasty and after they run back run to Abu Muslim because of the Tang Dynasty 🤣🤣 they join Abu Muslim the best warrior in is time in battle of talas because they were scared of Tang Dynasty 🤣😂
RevanX half of this video is fake just google about the origin of the Safavids, Mughals , Golden Horde , and others this video is joke just like Turkic history JUST GOOGLE
@@yaqubleis6311
*In Iran entered a period of relative obscurity and seclusion under
two dynasties of Turkish origin: the Safavids and the Qajars.[1]
*The Safavids were of Turkish descent..[2]
*As with their Safavid predecessors, the new dynasty was of Turkish origin ;
and administrative institutions similar to those the Safavids had attempted to build up were revived.[3]
*There was a real need for the Safavids to disassociate themselves from their
arch-foes by playing down their own Turkish origins.[4]
*The Divan of Shah İsmail, the founder of the Safavid Dynasty was written in Turkish,,
because he was of Turcoman origin.[5]
*The Safavids (1501-1722), two major dynasties of Turkish origin.[6]
*The modern history of Persia really begins with the rise of the SAFAVID dynasty in 1500.
Although these rulers were also Turkish in origin, they espoused the SHITTE form of Islam and established a state.[7]
*The Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal Empires. Though political and ideological rivals,
all three empires were of Turkic origin and belonged to the same Persianate cultural universe.[8]
*Form of Shi'ism under pressure from the Safavids, originally a Turkic Sufi order who were themselves former Sunnis.[9]
*The three Islamic empires of the early modern period - the Mughal, the Safavid, and the Ottoman -
shared a common Turko-Mongolian heritage.[10]
*Safavid power with its distinctive Persian-Shi‘i culture, however, remained a middle ground between
its two mighty Turkish neighbors. The Safavid state, which lasted at least until 1722,
was essentially a "Turkish" dynasty, with Azeri Turkish (Azerbaijan being the family's home base)
as the language of the rulers and the court as well as the Qizilbash military establishment.[11]
*Under the Safavids, the Azeri Turks came into conflict with the expanding Ottoman Turks[12]
*A massive migration of Oghuz Turks in the l lth and l2th centuries not only Turkified Azerbaijan
but also Anatolia. The Azeri Turks are Shi'ites and were founders of the Safavid dynasty.[13]
*The modern history of Persia really begins with the rise of the *Safavid Dynasty in 1500.
Although these rulers were also Turkish in origin, they espoused the Shi'ite form of Islam.[14]
*The Caucasus was a battleground between the Sunni Ottoman Empire and the Turkic Shia Safavid Dynasty of Persia.[15]
*Shah Isma'il I (1500-24), the founder of the Safavid dynasty of Azeri origin, made the Shi'a branch of Islam.[16]
*This family, reported by some sources to be of Azerbaijani origin[17]
*Three major Islamic empires emerged, all with Turkic roots to varying degrees: those of the
Ottomans (1300-1922), Safavids (1501-1722), and Moghuls (1526-1858).[18]
*The Ottoman eastward expansion was stalled by the rise of another Turkish dynasty, the Safavids, in Persia.[19]
*The Safavid Turks, who had their genesis in a Shia dervish order in Azerbaijan.[20]
*Selim I captured the Capital Tebriz also and thus put a check on the growth of the military power of the Safavid Turks.[21]
* “gunpowder empires”: the Empire of the Ottoman Turks (centered in Turkey),
that of the Safavid Turks (centered in Iran or Persia)[22]
*Discuss the religious and political issues that separated the Ottoman Turks and the Safavid Turks.[23]
*See Ottoman Empire; Safavid Turks Turks, 10 revolt against, 225 Safavid, 30 Twelver branch.[24]
* In the early 16th century, the Azeri dynasty of the Safavids ( r. 1501-1736 )
took power in Tabriz and developed a culture that influenced much of the region.[25]
*Of three great empires: the Mughals in South Asia, the ?afavids in Persia, and the Ottomans in the west.
The three empires shared basic features such as Turkic dynastic origins.[26]
*What most Iranians are not told (neither by the Shia clergy nor ultra-Iranian nationalits)
is how the Turkic Safavids slaughtered thousands upon thousands of Persians (Sunnis),
starting with the elite, the thinkers and scholars.[27]
*The rule of the Turkic Safavids completed the process of linguistic Turkicisation
of modern Azerbaijanis which was initiated by the Seljuks in the eleventh century.[28]
*Buyids (Iranian) (945-1055) . Ghaznavids (Turkic) (994-1030) . Seljuks (Turkic) (1045-1217) .
Mongol/Ilkhanid Dynasties (Turkicized Mongols) (1221-1338) .
Timurids and Turkmen (Turkic) (1383-1501) . Safavids (Turkic) (1501-1722)[29]
* Although arising from a local, originally Sunni Sufi order in Azerbaijan,
the Turkish Safavids speedily became the vigorous upholders of Shi'ism.[30]
*The Safavid and Qajar dynasties,rulers in Iran from 1501 to 1722 and from
1795 to 1925 respectively,were Turkic in origin[31]
*Understands political achievements of the Safavid and Mughal Empires
,how Persia was unified by the Turkic Safavids.[32]
*Therefore, the student is able to: 5-12 Explain the unification of Persia under the Turkic Safavids.[33]
*To bolster its legitimacy, the Turkish Safavid dynasty created the fiction of an ancestral link.[34]
*The Turkic origin of the Safavid dynasty,which is rarely acknowledged in u conventional Turkish nationalist historiography.[35]
*Shah Ismail, a Turk of the Shi'i sect of Islam, arose as leader of both Turkic and Iranian
adherents of this sect, who placed more emphasis upon religion than upon ethnic origin.[36]
* The Safavids were originally Turkic, ghazis like the Osmanlis and succeeded, like them, in distancing possible rivals.[37]
* The Safavids were descended from a family of Turkmen Sufi sheikhs from Ardabil, in Azerbaijan.[38]
* In the early 1500s, a thirteen-year-old Turkmen named Ismail, who lived in western Iran, conquered the whole country[39]
* Yet even Iran's foreign conquerors - such as the Turkic Safavid, Afshar, and Qajar dynasties.[40]
Sources:
*1-Women, Religion and Culture in Iran
*2-World History DeMYSTiFieD Stephanie Muntone McGraw Hill Professional-Page 238
*3-Modern Persian Prose Literature-Page 9
*4-Comparative History of Civilizations in Asia: 10,000 B.C. to 1850 Edward L. Farmer Westview Press-Page 430
*5-Cultural Horizons: A festschrift in honor of Talat S. Halman,Volume 1 Jayne L. Warne Syracuse University Press, 2001
*6-Women's History in Global Perspective,Volume 3-Page 82
*7-New Catholic Encyclopedia: A-Azt-Page 140
*8-The Eckstein Shahnama: An Ottoman Book of KingsWill Kwiatkowski Sam Fogg,2005-Page 9
*9-Religions of Iran: From Prehistory to the Present-Page 192
*10-Safavid, Mughal,and Ottoman Empires(Cambridge University Press)
*11-Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective(Cambridge University Press)-Page 86-87.
*12-Global Security Watch-The Caucasus States-Page 3
*13-Iran II: Iranian history - Iran V: Peoples of Iran,Volume 3 Ehsan Yarshater
The Encyclopaedia Iranica Foundation,2006-Page 325
*14-New Catholic Encyclopedia-Volumr 1.-18.-Page 16
*15-Caucasus:Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide-Page 3
*16-Eastern Europe, Russia and Central Asia 2003-Page 104
*17-Azerbaijan, Mosques, Turrets, Palaces Ilona Turánszky Corvina Kiadó,1979-Page 21
*18-The Turks in World History(Oxford University Press)-Page 94
*19-Conflict, Conquest, and Conversion: Two Thousand Years of Christian Missions
in the Middle East(Columbia University Press)
*20-The Rising Tide of Cultural Pluralism: The Nation-state at Bay?(Univ of Wisconsin Press)
*21-Proceedings of the All Pakistan Political Science Conference,Volume
*22-Expansion and Global Interaction, 1200-1700 David R. Ringrose Longman,2001-Page 135
*23-Student Study Guide and Map Exercise Workbook to accompany Traditions and Encounters,Volume 2
BENTLEY McGraw-Hill Companies,Incorporated
*24-The Politics of the Middle East Monte Palmer F.E. Peacock Publishers,2002-Page 425
*25-Grove Encyclopedia of Islamic Art & Architecture: Three-Volume Set(Oxford University Press)-Page 236
*26-The Oxford Encyclopedia of Islam and Politics Emad Eldin Shahin, ?Peri J. Bearman, ?Sohail H. Hashmi - 2014
*27-Son of Sunnah-Persian Sunni scholars VS the King of the Safavids
*28-Routledge Handbook of the Caucasus
*29-Christianity in Persia and the Status of Non-Muslims in Modern Iran-Page 275
*30-Encyclopaedia of Islam Ian Richard Netton-Page 570
*31-Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Africa and the Middle East-Page 707
*32-Content knowledge: a compendium of standards and benchmarks for K-12 education
John S. Kendall, Robert J. Marzano Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory,1996-Page 243
*33-National standards for history National Center for History in the Schools (U.S.),
Charlotte Antoinette Crabtree, Gary B. Nash-Page 180
*34-Government and Politics of the Contemporary Middle East: Continuity and change-Page
*35-New Perspectives on Turkey,36-37.-Page 230
*36-The Middle East and South Asia,Stryker-Post Publications,1968-Page 10
*37- The History of the World JJohn Morris Roberts, Odd Arne Westad
(Oxford University Press)-Page 403
*38-The Safavids and their Successors - The David Collection
*39- Iran the People - Page 10
*40- Iran and the world: continuity in a revolutionary decade(Indiana University Press)-Page 11
Add Scythians Tagar,Botai and Karasuk cultures Contemporary descendants of western Scythian groups are found among various groups in the Caucasus and Central Asia, while similarities to eastern Scythian are found to be more widespread, but almost exclusively among Turkic language speaking (formerly) nomadic groups, particularly from the Kipchak branch of Turkic languages (Supplementary Note 1).
Unterländer, M., Palstra, F., Lazaridis, I. et al.Ancestry and demography and descendants of Iron Age nomads of the Eurasian Steppe. Nat Commun 8, 14615 (2017).
We observed particularly high similarity between the Tagar and Classic Scythians from the North Pontic region.
In a comparison of our Tagar series with modern populations in Eurasia, we detected similarity between the Tagar group and some modern Turkic-speaking populations (with the exception of the Indo-Iranian Tajik population) (Fig 7; S2 Table). Among the modern Turkic-speaking groups, populations from the western part of the Eurasian steppe belt, such as Bashkirs from the Volga-Ural region and Siberian Tatars from the West Siberian forest-steppe zone, were more similar to the Tagar group than modern Turkic-speaking populations of the Altay-Sayan mountain system (including the Khakassians from the Minusinsk basin) (Fig 7).
Based on our results, we can preliminarily conclude that there was genetic continuity, at least partially, between the Early, the Middle and the Late Tagar populations. We did not find evidence of extensive gene exchange between the Tagar population and any genetically distinct (with respect to the mtDNA pool) human groups.
Maternal genetic features of the Iron Age Tagar population from Southern Siberia (1st millennium BC)
Pilipenko AS, Trapezov RO, Cherdantsev SV, Babenko VN, Nesterova MS, et al. (2018)Maternal genetic features of the Iron Age Tagar population from Southern Siberia (1st millennium BC). PLOS ONE 13(9): e0204062.
These were actual states or empires he showed not cultures i think then we could go to 6000 bc for honsha culture for example
no turks are not sythian alans are last sythians(turks have a bit of iranian genes but not much)
@@rbcso9144 The Scythians are a mixed people, and Herodotus even uses the expression Turcae when describing the Scythians.
@@rbcso9144 Seni bilgimle düzeltirim ama şimdi kim uğraşıcak. Bak sadece şunu söyleyim, İskitlere Hint-Avrupalı denmesinin sebebi gümüş bir kaptır ve bu kabın üzerinde runik harflerle bir yazı yazar. Bunu hatalı bir şekilde okurlar ve bu uydurma olan bu tezin mazisi burada başlar. İskitler kozmopolit bir halktı ama yöneticleri ve kurucuları Türktü.
Greetings to Turkish people from a Hungarian men! I love Turkey,Turkish people and Turkish language! ❤
❤❤
Csaba Horváth thank you :)
i love Hungary too
Thank you! I'm flying back home to Budapest in about an hour! I'm already at the boarding gate for my flight! ✈ :)
Csaba Horváth greetings to you and hungarian my brothers ! :D
☆ TURAN ☆
i am greek and i respect the turkish culture
jak jouk rare
jak jouk thank you :D I'm a turk and I also respect the greek culture :3
and we know that how great is greek culture and history but we are in ignorance era so we will have a lot of retards attacking other coutries
jak jouk I am Turkish and I respect all cultures and religions. And Fuck USA
Sergio Ramoz Greek*
During Timur's lifetime, 6 empires crushed more than 10 states. This is too much for the whole persian history The strongest empires of the period disappeared against his, the Ottoman Empire, the Mamluk empire, the Golden Horde empire, the Chagatai empire, the Delhi empire, the Qara Qoyunlu empire,Kharezm kingdom,Serbedar kingdom,Toga Timur kingdom,Muzafferi kingdom,Kert kingdom,Jalayir kingdom,Georgian kingdom,Burhanneddin kingdom,Persian kingdom and others. Timur conquered many empires and he built the strongest empire in the world alone In the Battle of Samarkand he defeated the Chagatai Khanate in 10,000 vs 30,000 in 1 to 3 ratio and escaped by barely saving the Mongol Khan. He destroyed 100 elephants army in Battle of Delhi, he defeated 60,000 men at a ratio of 1 to 2 in the Battle of the Kondurcha River with 30,000 men, he crushed the Persian army in the Battle of Isfahan and built towers out of their heads LOOOLL he victory by killing 50,000 men against an army of 140,000 in the Battle of the Terek river, he defeated the Mamluk Sultan's army of 80,000 people in the Battle of Damascus and locked the Sultan in the city, then he destroyed the Georgian kingdom and put the Ottomans in a period of temporary collapse in the Battle of Ankara. he defetaed 85,000 Ottoman, 30,000 Georgians, 80,000 Mamluks, 45,000 Indians, 200,000 Persians, 140,000 Kipchaks and a total army of 580,000 in 7 years.Cyrus and Shapur a joke,PERSİAN HİSTORY JOKE
@@naumanriyaz6676 Timur?
Eh?
I mean
Persia did Conquer more lands than the Ottomans
@@Scankarl This video is about Turks,not Turkey(or Ottoman)
@@aminabdullayev1545 isn't The ottomans the Largest Turkic Empire
I mean
They are Anatolian "Turks" after all
@@Scankarl yeah 7million kilometers
Love to all my turkic friends from Pakistan, some of the fiercest warriors of Islam and of course The Conqueror were of turkic descent, much respect
Jive Pakistan
Merhaba 😊, I am from Tunisia and descendant of Crimean-Tatar mamluk of Ottoman Army in Tunus. 25% of Tunisia are descendants of Turks, there are millions descendants of Turks in North-Africa except Morocco. I am also scared they would lose their Ottoman heritage 😔. I am self proud of my Tatar/Turk/Ottoman heritage I would say I am Tatar/Turk before Tunisian, my dream is to InsAllah move to Istanbul Turkey and therefore study at Ankara tech university. Greetings my Turkic brothers from Tunisia 😁.
You're kidding or what ?! million lol
frist time heard that, is all North African Arab?
@@mydad4332 north Africans are mostly Berbers , not Arabs
@@gezguchinomadi4880 no they are Mediterranean, Zinedine Zidane is a north African
Marlon Jormungand Isn’t a huge difference for me.
Man Uzbek turkuyim her keza selamlar
Men*
Salam OZBEK kandasim
@@turkestanskymapper9580 E ben
Aleyküm selam
Aleykum selam kandaş
Where sakas , kushans ?
Oxford
Saka is Turkic origin.
Turkish influence
Turkic tribes like Sakas, Kushanas, when they settled on India's borders and inside it also adopted ... Julian Raby of Oxford has done a PhD thesis on this subject) that Fetih, the Conqueror of ...
www.cs.colostate.edu/~malaiya/turkish.html
well, the Sakas had a written language, and by their words, it was confirmed that it was an Iranian language, probably ancestor of the Wakhi and Sarikoli languages.
he missed many Turkish states such as Turk Shahi,Zunbils,Tokhara Yabghus,Ghurids,Kushans,Ayyubids etc.
@@antoinelavoisier2772 Tochara Yabghus
Love them or hate them. Turkic peoples are awesome!! My daddy told me cool stories about them as warriors so cool y'all should check the history of them. I'm a 12 year old black american girl and I use to have a Turkic friend she was Uzbek and I love the way she paints pictures of things and show me cool things from Uzbekistan. So sad she had to move to Great Britain she was so fun to has as a friend. Turkics are awesome to me.
Helal sana kardeşim. Merak etme Dünya'nın her yerinde en az bir Türk bulabilirsin :D. Yorumunu çok beğendim sevgilerle :)
their most elite units(yanissaries, quapukulus and ghulams), mostly consisted of captured europeans and steppe children, that they raized up to do soldiering(without having family bonds, loyalty issues etc).
SuperMrFriendly this is the most cruelty of Ottomans but also Janniseries had become most precious army of Ottomans. Its little bit dilemma. They were important than Turkish origin army which name is akinji (cavaliers from turkish village). Janniseries were used hand cannon. They were one of the most fired arm military groups of the world. (second, spanish conquistadors).
SuperMrFriendly yanissaries ghulams and quapukulus were not our most elite units. They where more elite than normal soldiers since they have no bond, but no where near the most elite. The most elite consisted of small groups of soldiers and not big groups like yanissaries. Btw these groups are ottoman groups and this kid is referring to turkic background.
Greetings to Black community ❤️
güney azərbaycannan , ne mutlu türküm diyənə 🌹🌹🌹
Kuzeyi de var ezizim nsnsj
Güney azerbaycan birgün fars hükmünden sıyrılacak ve ÖZGÜR VE HÜR OLACAK.
Farslar müslüman düşmanıdır
Kefere farslar
Birleseceyik inshAllah az qalib qardasim
Nice job bro. Thanks 👍 🇹🇷🇦🇿🇰🇿🇹🇲🇺🇿🇭🇺🇰🇬🇵🇰
The ancestors of the Indo-Turkic people migrated to South Asia at the time of the Delhi Sultanate and the Mughal Empire. The Delhi Sultanate is a term used to cover five short-lived, Delhi-based kingdoms three of which were of Turkic origin in medieval India. These Turkic dynasties were the Indo-Scythians(controversial),Kushans(controversial),White Huns,Hindu Shahi, Ghaznavids, Delhi Sultanate, Mamluk dynasty (Delhi), Khalji dynasty, Tughlaq dynasty, Bengal Sultanate, Adil Shahi dynasty, Bidar Sultanate, Qutb Shahi dynasty, Timurids, Deccan sultanates, Mughal Empire, Oudh State, Nawabs of Bengal and Murshidabad, Hyderabad State, Khanate of Kalat, Makran (princely state), Banganapalle State, Amb (princely state), Chitral (princely state), Phulra, Hunza (princely state), Nagar (princely state) Mamluk dynasty (1206-90); the Khalji dynasty (1290-1320);Gurjara Prathiara Dynasty (mid-8th century CE-1036 CE); and the Tughlaq dynasty (1320-1414). Southern India also saw many Turkic origin dynasties like the Bahmani Sultanate, the Adil Shahi dynasty, the Bidar Sultanate, and the Qutb Shahi dynasty, collectively known as the Deccan sultanates. The Mughal Empire was a Turkic-founded Indian empire that, at its greatest territorial extent, ruled most of the South Asia, including Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh and parts of Uzbekistan from the early 16th to the early 18th centuries. The Mughal dynasty was founded by a Chagatai Turkic prince named Babur (reigned 1526-30), who was descended from the Turkic conqueror Timur (Tamerlane) on his father's side and from Chagatai, second son of the Mongol ruler Genghis Khan, on his mother's side.Mughals who have Turkic ancestry live in the Indian subcontinent in significant numbers. Karlugh Turks are also found in the Haraza region and in smaller number in Azad Kashmir region of Pakistan. Small number of Uyghurs are also present in India. Many Turks also live in Hyderabad known as Deccani Muslims they have Arab, Afghan, Persian, and Turkic ancestries in addition to having the local dravidian heritage. There is also a significant population an Warriors Status used by Turkic descendants known as Rowther, who are mostly found in Southern India.[1]
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Turkic_people
Muhammad Ghori, founder of Ghorid Empire
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turks_in_India
Most of them were not even tukric
Bengal sultanate was iranic in origin same with many Deccan sultanates
You are claiming everyones history
@@user-uj2tk2tv3z these pan turks are weird... i am azeri from iran and i love my country as do most of our people
@@user-uj2tk2tv3z Bengal sultanate was turk. Even indo european and indo iranic propagandist website -Vikipedia says Turko-Persian to Bengal by dont want to say turkic to it. Dont wrong yourselves with others. You say even indo iranian to everbody, God,AlliensNeanderthallea.
Im Azerbaijaninan Turk, GOD bless all Turks people
Логико go fuck yourself
you are from us Turks bro
@A oh i see
İrak Türkmenlerinden, Selam olsun Türk Qardaşlarıma ✋️ Turan Kurulsun 👏
Aleykum salam qardaşım. 🙏
Kayra we talk in Turkman Language thats so near to Turkesh accent ☪️
@Kayra Turkiye disindaki Oguz Turklerine Turkmen diyoruz
@Kayra turkic.
@TURAN UNİON TURKS Aslinda ayni seyi anlatmaya calisiyoruz sanirim.
Evet dediginiz dogru. Lakin mesela İrak Turkleri demekten çok İrak Turkmenleri diyoruz, Suriye Turkleri demek yerine Suriye Turkmenleri, Bayirbucak Turkmenleri vs diyoruz. Halbuki birebir ayniyiz onlarla.
Kastettigim fark bu.
Turkiyede biz Turkmeniz demekten cok millet adini kullanmayi yani Turkuz demeyi tercih ediyoruz.
azerbaycanlılar sırf karabağ Azerbaycan devletinde gözükmüyor diye video'ya disslike atmayın.bu video sadece hangi toprak kimin elindeyse onu anlatıyor.mal mal iş yapmayın
Aynen güzel video
@@kaldirdimgobegihophopa9811
Kardeş su link de arnavutlar Ataturke arnavut diyolar. Oraya da bi raid yapsaniza
th-cam.com/video/nE85HSzSKLc/w-d-xo.html
im turk from east turkistan ben dogu turkistan liyim uyghur turkuyum ben uyghurum
TheLegend1337 Doğu Türkistan Çin’de dimi
@@kingdrager9045 evet
💗
@@kingdrager9045 işgal altindA
❤️
Thank you for this great video! Greetings from Kazakhstan to my Turk brothers & sisters all over the world!
Selam olsun Anadolu Türklerinden Kazak eline!
@Alpha Film
Anladım. Hatta doğulular buna benzer konuşuyorlar. Dağdan infim şehre tipler
@Alpha Film İstanbul'a sonradan gelmeler
Arghun Pride almost half this video is fake most of them are not even Turkic origin like Göktürk the rulers of Göktürk were Iranic Saka-Wusun Origin Form the Ashina according to Chinese sources and almost all modern historians Researchers such as H. W. Haussig,[1] S. G. Klyashtorny,[2][3] A. N. Bernstamm,[4] C. V. Findley,[5] D.G. Savinov,[6] S. P. Guschin,[7] Rona-Tas[8] and R. N. Frye[9] have pointed out that the origin of the Ashina is from the Iranian Saka-Wusun Origin form the Ashina tribe
@@yaqubleis6311
:) I am laughing to you :) Ashina means "she wolf" and ashina Iranic ? :)))) hahahah
The Mughals (1526-1858) lost control of India in the 1700s, but many of the local rulers who replaced them were also Turks, at least until the British took over.
Chase, K. (2003). Conclusion. In Firearms: A Global History to 1700 (pp. 197-210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yeah n us germanic/celtic people r ur rulers. Don't forget it
Huns,Xiognu and Hepthalite is Turkic.
Hunnic Empire was the empire of the Huns. The Huns were a confederation of Eurasian tribes, especially Turkic ones, from the Steppes of Central Asia.
www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Hunnic_Empire
----------------------------------------------------
Recent genetics research in 2003[4] confirmed the studies[5] indicating that the Turkic peoples,[6] originated from the same area and therefore are possibly related.
www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Xiongnu
-----------------------------------------------------
Hepthalite
Imagewww.oxfordreference.com
› ...
Hephthalites - Oxford Reference
Inner Asian 'Hunnic' group (or rather dynasty), perhaps of Turkic origin, whose name appears first in 456; by 467 they had displaced the ...
Iranian Huns. The term “Huns” was also used for several tribes who posed a continuous threat to northeastern Iran and northwestern India from the 4th century C.E. Earlier research attempted to establish a connection between the different tribes mentioned in the sources, and to consider them all as Hephthalites (cf. Ghirshman, pp. 69-134). Altheim (III, 1961, p. 7) viewed the Hephthalites as the original tribe of the Huns, from which the European Huns had split off. In addition, he also assumed a Turkish origin for all these tribes (Altheim, I, 1959, pp. 45 ff.).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Babur is Turkic origin.
Imagebooks.google.com.tr
› books
The Oxford Illustrated History of the World
Felipe Fernández-Armesto · 2019 · History
In July , Ismail was enthroned as Shah and he proclaimed Shiism as ... Turkic-Mongol in origin, the Empire was established in by a Chagatai Turk, Zahiruddin Muhammad Babur
books.google.com.tr/books?id=eUSCDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA316&lpg=PA316&dq=babur+shah+turkic+oxford&source=bl&ots=1CRP9wyLg4&sig=ACfU3U3z2yUJfMwp3U8m5uedHqLxLVQYIg&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiii4yH3aTnAhUz4KYKHfv3BdMQ6AEwA3oECAoQAQ
Imagewww.cambridge.org
› books
Safavid, Mughal, and Ottoman Empires (Chapter 1 ... - Cambridge University Press
In 1501 Shah Ismail I (1501-1524), the founder of the dynasty, defeated the Turkish Aq Quyunlu forces ... Muhammad Zahir al-Din Babur, a Chagatai Turk from Fergana in Central Asia ...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scythian is a confederetion and its founding group was Turkic SAKA.
Imagebooks.google.com.tr
› books
Routledge Revivals: Trade, Travel and Exploration in the Middle ...
John Block Friedman, Kristen Mossler Figg · 2017 · History
Arab geographers described “Inner Scythia” (the land of the Turkic peoples) using ... Harvard Ukrainian Studies 12/13 (1988-1989): 400-413.
----------------------------------------------------------
These earlier scholars based their accounts not on classical texts but on
references to Scythians (sometimes explicitly identified as “Turks”) in medieval
Latin and Byzantine universal chronicles and apocalyptic literature. In these
sources ...
Page153
None of the humanist authors who read Greek-Filelfo, Sagundino, Gaza, Merula
-based his history of the Scythian Turks on information from the Histories.139
books.google.com.tr/books?id=XDmZXIDiZG8C&pg=PA149&lpg=PA149&dq=scythian+turks&source=bl&ots=d7qnjR6GgR&sig=ACfU3U1UMWCuSHWCtuxdtMnOdCYJp134VA&hl=tr&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=scythian%20turks&f=false
Var videoda hepsi
@@olumluhayatbugunvarsinyari1326 yorumlarda inkar edenler var onlar için yazdım
there is still a lot of turkic origin autonomies in russia and ex-soviet countries also china.
freedom to Uyghurs!
Türk yurdu esen olsun.
Freedom to Kurds
More like the Turks have a lot of East Asian ancestry....
@Edward Snowden Kurds already freedom 😂 Killing a mother with her baby does not mean that they are prisoners, but that they are free and t*rrorists. (except good people and not supporters of terrorist organization like pkk / isis / ypg). #ErenBülbül #BedirhanKarakaya
@Juche Not east asian but central asian
@@ancientturkey2308 Ughurs are already free, going to a mining site and Murdering almost a hundred Han Chinese Innocent workers in Cold blood, does not mean they are prisoners but T*rrorists. China should Open a Kurdistan embassy and help people like Ocalan form Kurdish organizations in China just as turkey has done for Ughurs.
I'm a kazakh. Assalauma Aleikum my turkic brothers
probbly all turkic language uses gardaş,kardeş,qardash etc.
Aleykum salam ben Türkiye türkuyum
Aleyküm selam
Salam Kandas
Алейкум салам из турсия
From this point of view, a large part of the 19 Cypriot historiography did not manage to achieve the substantial for the historian, to use a phrase by Eric Hobsbawm, overcoming of passions and political identities, 20⁰ identities that were of course created at the end or even after the Ottoman period. That is to say, that the national political identity of the Greek and the Turk, the national political ensembles of Greeks and Turks, realities of the post-Ottoman period in Cyprus are projected on the past of the 16th century.
Thus, in 1571 Cyprus was conquered by the Ottomans and for the next three hundred and more years was a part of the Ottoman territory. The Greek Cypriot historiography uses for this transition and generally the entire Ottoman period the term Turkish rule a term that lends a national Turkish identity to Ottomans. A big part of traditional historiography refers to a Turkish state,²¹ mentioning a Turkish government, while correspondingly the conquered are included in another national identity, the Greek, which - and perhaps this is more important - at the time history is written, is in conflict with the Turkish.
Already from the end of the 19th century, Greek Cypriot historiography states that during the Turkish rule "the spirit of the inhabitants fell to a pitiful point and poverty and misery and extreme ignorance, and depression of the national morale covered the island".23 The Orthodox on the island are defined by traditional historiography as a political group since "in the vizier's orders the participant in the defence of Famagusta Greek was a term that was generalised for all Greeks on the island". In relation to the population on the island the Turkish rule mentions that "after the occupation of Cyprus by the Turks the census that took place for tax pur poses revealed that the native Cypriot Greeks aged [...] in this population 20.000 30.000 Turks were added".25 It is also established that "the Turkish occupation brought to Cyprus many radical changes. The Turks supported the Greek population on the island in order not to give the opportunity to the peoples of Europe to be interested in the Cypriots […]”.26
And as it began with a national conflict that is how italso ends, since it is mentioned that “while the Turkish conquerors suppressed andpersecuted the Greeks on the island […]”.27
The existence therefore of a politicalnational group is considered given and every analysis of the Ottoman period func-tions in a way to bring to the forefront or reinforce the existence, even under difficultconditions, of such a group. This expressed the stereotyped view that the Cypriots“managed under the protection of the Church to maintain their religion, language,and national conscience as Greeks”.28
Even when relations are examined on differentlevels, even when they refer to the 17th
century, these are characterised as relationsof the “Greeks and the Turks of Cyprus”.29
In the Turkish Cypriot historiography, the same perception is more or less fol-lowed; history is written under the same terms, the national terms but with one sub-stantial difference: The “Turks on the island” 30
are usually referred to as acomplimentary term of the word Ottomans and are placed on the side of the goodoften contrary to the “Greeks, Greek Cypriots” who are on the opposite side. Thesettlement of the “Turks”on the island is interpreted as something that broughtabout positive results for the entire island 31 and the local Ottoman administration isgenerally whitewashed. In short, Turkish Cypriot historiography also accepts theexistence of national groups. The Church of Cyprus expresses again the Greeks of Cyprus and its activities are mainly targeted against the Turks of Cyprus, 32
whilewithout hesitation the actions of the Prelates of 1600 in Cyprus are combined andidentified with the Akritas plan of the period after the independence. 33
The Prelatesare considered to express not only spiritually but also nationally the Orthodox of Cyprus while institutionally the Church of Cyprus is perceived as warring towardsthe local Turkish administration. 34
The Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot histo-riographies are identified when they project the present on the past, a past howeverthat is perceived and interpreted from a very different national point of view.
Michael, M., Kappler, M. and Gavriel, E., 2009. Ottoman Cyprus: A Collection of Studies on History and Culture Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp.14,15.
From the east to sunrise in the east, to the middle of the day in the south, from the west to the sunset in the west, to the midnight in the north, the people in it always follow me.
Long live Turks. Turk jasasyn 🇰🇿🇰🇬🇹🇷🇦🇿🇺🇿 Greetings from Kazakstan
And 🇹🇲
♥
Turkic people are not Turks
@@purple.requiem turkish and turk are not the same things.
turkish are Anatolia turks and Cyprus turks.
Orher turks are Azerbaijani turks, Turkmen turks, Uzbek turks, Uyghur turks, Altai turks, Kerkuk turkmens, Gagauz turks, kazakhs, Yakut turks and etc
@@purple.requiem there is no such thing like Turkic stupid! This is bullshit of Stalin. We all Turks.
MEN HORASAN TÜRKÜYEM
@Sinan KOÇ Komik mi?
Ertuğrul Gazinin yurdu 🌷
@Kanadalı Türk sen olsa olsa zenci olursun💩💩💩
Bizim ata toprahları
Eray Hantepe ırkçı
Azerbaijan❤Iran. turk azerbaijani qajars , safavids,and afshars ruled iran 500 years. persians love turk azerbaijan! azerbaijanis were greatest turkic warriors and lions 🇦🇿❤🇮🇷
About Türk history not Shia history Please be Türk not sectarian of Iran
We are TURKS
We don't sectarian
@Bilge Kağan I think he's Persian not Turkish Azeri
@@foreverturkh azerbaijanis are greatest turkic warriors!
@@iran6888
Typic Shia fachist propaganda
Ha haa 😊
TURKS IS TURK
Not Turkic, Shia boy
ممنون برادر آذربایجان همیشه برای ایران جنگیده و خواهد جنگید چون ایران وطن ما هست 🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷
Turkic peoples founded many dynasties that ruled other nations in history. The Arpad Dynasty was a Turkic origin dynasty that ruled the Hungarians and invaded Europe[23][24][25][26] The Krum dynasty was the founder of the First Bulgarian empire of Turkic origin and ruled to become the most powerful empire of the period[27][28][29][30][31][32] Wei dynasty was a Turkic dynasty that ruled the Chinese[33][34] Tang dynasty were Turkic soldier origin[35][36]
The Tang dynasty was not turkic you muppet. The second Tang emperor's mother was a concubine, and had mixed Sogdian Han ancestry, whilst his father was fully Han chinese. To your logic, German people ruled over Britain when Queen Victoria ruled, since Prince Albert was German
Turks hobie make country and more make country
Fok Balığı nick güzel :)
spinoaurus yesbro
Making countries on other people’s land and coast what a evil nation !
Rey Strate Y Then go back to Africa because your ancestors genocided neanderthals in middle east. Will you? I don't think so. Plus Turks are mixed with Greeks, didn't steal anything.
@@regasaman3768 why you crying?
Turks cannot stay in one place for long. And once that Turkic tribe moves into foreign lands they don't look back, someone else takes over that land. The Oghuz started from Caspian sea coast of Turkmenistan, then moved to Iran, then to Syria, then to Anatolia, then into Europe. Even the mighty Ottomans an Oghuz descendant did not attempt to occupy Turkmenistan. One more interesting point is their degree of assimilation. In most races there is racial purity but in Turkic lands if you speak Turkic and behave like a Turk you are a Turk.
"In most races there is racial purity but in Turkic lands if you speak Turkic and behave like a Turk you are a Turk." thats what get me :D :D :D and its true :D :D whatever ur origin may be if u behave like a Turk u are a Turk :D
“If you speak Turkic and behave like a Turk you are a Turk.” Honestly love that. Genetics don’t create your identity, your actions do.
If you are friendly with the Turks, they will sacrifice your life for you.If you become an enemy with the Turkish, they will be even more cruel than God.The whole world is so afraid of the Turks that you can see it everywhere.You can check out the weapon of the latest New Zealand terrorist.God's soldiers on earth are Turks.
MrA cry bitch
Fuck Turks! Arabs don't care about you or want you here in the Middle East, go back to central Asia!
Why Xiongnu for a short time? Why not like the Mongol video?
Xiongnu is Turkic:
.
The predecessors of Huihe were Xiongnu. Because, customarily, they ride high-wheeled carts. They were also called Gaoche during the Yuan Wei times, or also called Chile, mistakenly rendered as Tiele.
- Xin Tangshu, 232
Weishu, vol. 103 txt: "高車，[...] 其語略與匈奴同而時有小異，或云其先匈奴之甥也", tr: "The Gaoju, [...] their language and the Xiongnu's are similar though differ a little; or to say it differently, they are the sororal nephews/sons-in-laws of the Xiongnu”
According to the Book of Wei, the Yuebans' language and customs were the same as the Gaoche, who were Turkic speakers. Yuebans(Weak Xiongnu) cut their hair and trimmed their ghee-smeared, sun-dried, glossy eyebrows evenly, and washed before meals three times everyday.
Weishu, Vol. 102 "其風俗言語與高車同，而其人清潔於胡。俗剪髮齊眉，以醍醐塗之，昱昱然光澤，日三澡漱，然後飲食。"
Chinese sources link the Tiele people and Ashina to the Xiongnu, According to the Book of Zhou and the History of the Northern Dynasties, the Ashina clan was a component of the Xiongnu confederation.
Linghu Defen et al., Book of Zhou, Vol. 50. (in Chinese)
Li Yanshou (李延寿), History of the Northern Dynasties, Vol. 99. (in Chinese)
Uyghur Khagans claimed descent from the Xiongnu (according to Chinese history Weishu, the founder of the Uyghur Khaganate was descended from a Xiongnu ruler).
The Gaoche are probably remnants of the ancient Red Di. Initially they had been called Dili. Northerners take them as Chile. Chinese take them as Gaoche Dingling. Their language, in brief, and Xiongnu [language] are the same yet occasionally there are small differences. Or one may say that they [Gaoche] are the junior relatives[18] of the Xiongnu in former times.
The Gaoche migrate in search of grass and water. They dress in skins and eat meat. Their cattle and sheep are just like those of the Rouran, but the wheel of their carts are high and have very many spokes.
- Weishu, 103
The forebears of the Tiele belonged to those Xiongnu descendants, having the largest divisions of tribes. They occupied the valleys, and were scattered across the vast region west of the Western Sea [Black Sea]
At the area north of the Duluo River, are the Bugu (僕骨), Tongluo (同羅), Weihe (韋紇),[17] Bayegu (拔也古), Fuluo (覆羅), which were all called Sijin (Irkin). Other tribes such as Mengchen (蒙陳), Turuhe (吐如紇), Sijie (斯結),[a] Hun (渾), Hu (斛), Xue (薛) (or Huxue) and so forth, also dwelled in this area. They had a 20,000 strong invincible army.
[...]
The names of these tribes differ, but all of them can be classified as Tiele. The Tiele do not have a master, but are subjected to the both Eastern and Western Tujue (Göktürks) respectively. They don't have a permanent residence, and move with the changes of grass and water. - Suishu, 84
Xiongnu is Turkic 2:
The Xiongnu became politically dominant in the steppes around 300
BC, and although the linguistic affiliation of the Xiongnu proper is still a matter of dispute, their political confederation certainly contained a significant Turkic component. By both ethnohistorical and linguistic considerations this component may in the first place be identified with the Bulgharic (Bulghar Turkic) branch of Turkic, today represented by the Chuvash language in the Volga region. The Turkic component of the Xiongnu is, however, unambiguously signalled by a number of Bulgharic loanwords in Proto-Samoyedic, such as *yür 'hundred'. The Bulgharic (Proto-Bulgharic) speakers are likely to have entered Southern Siberia, the location of Proto-Samoyedic, not earlier than the last century BC. At the same time, a number of local words, notably *kadi 'conifer' (> Chuvash xira,,~ xir 'birch '), were borrowed from Proto-Samoyedic into Bulgharic.
An earlier date for the separation of proto-Turkic, preceding 209 BC would support the identification of Xiongnu language with proto-Bulgharic or one of its subgroups, while a later date of separation would make its association with proto-Turkic more plausible.
Alexander Savelyev, Martine Robbeets, Bayesian phylolinguistics infers the internal structure and the time-depth of the Turkic language family, Journal of Language Evolution, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2020
As this time depth coincides with the beginning of the Xiongnu empire (209 BCE-100 CE), the association of Xiongnu with Proto-Bulgharic does not seem unreasonable. However, given the relatively large credible interval involved in the Bayesian dating, the breakup of proto-Turkic may also be connected with the first disintegration of the Xiongnu confederation under influence of the military successes of the Chinese in 127-119 BCE (Mudrak 2009). In sum, the time depth of the breakup of Proto-Turkic can be estimated between 500 BCE and 100 CE.
Martine Robbeets, Remco Bouckaert, Bayesian phylolinguistics reveals the internal structure of the Transeurasian family, Journal of Language Evolution, Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2018
The language of the European Huns is sometimes referred to as a Bulghar Turkic variety in general linguistic literature, but caution is needed in establishing its affiliations.
The predominant part of the Xiongnu population is likely to have spoken Turkic (Late Proto-Turkic, to be more precise).
Cite this article: Savelyev A, Jeong C (2020). Early nomads of the Eastern Steppe and their tentative connections in the West. Evolutionary Human Sciences 2, e20, 1-17.
Xiongnu is Turkic 3:
Gaoju, apparently, are the remaining branch of the ancient Chidi. Originally they were called "Dili", in the north they are called "Chile", and in China "Gaoju Dinglings", i.e. High Carts Dinglings. Their language is generally similar to the Xiongnu, but sometimes there are small differences. - Book of Wei
Wei Shou (4). Book of Wei (History of Northern Wei Dynasty). Peking, Bo-na, 1958, pp. 26a-26b
The Gaoche are probably remnants of the ancient Red Di. Initially they had been called Dili. Northerners take them as Chile. Chinese take them as Gaoche Dingling. Their language, in brief, and Xiongnu [language] are the same yet occasionally there are small differences. Or one may say that they [Gaoche] are the junior relatives[18] of the Xiongnu in former times. The Gaoche migrate in search of grass and water. They dress in skins and eat meat. Their cattle and sheep are just like those of the Rouran, but the wheel of their carts are high and have very many spokes. - Weishu, 103
According to the Book of Wei, the Yuebans' language and customs were the same as the Gaoche, who were Turkic speakers. Yuebans(Weak Xiongnu) cut their hair and trimmed their ghee-smeared, sun-dried, glossy eyebrows evenly, and washed before meals three times everyday.
Weishu, Vol. 102 " 高車同,而其人清潔於胡。俗剪髮 齊眉以醍醐塗之,昱昱然光澤, 日三澡漱然後飲食。
Tiele are originally Xiongnu's splinter stocks. As Tujue are strong and prosperous, all Tiele districts (EB) are divided and scattered, the masses gradually dwindled and weakened. Until the beginning of Wude [era], there have been Xueyantuo, Qibi, Huihe, Dubo, Guligan, Duolange, Pugu, Bayegu, Tongluo, Hun, Sijie, Huxue, Xijie, Adie, Baixi, etc. scattered in the northern wastelands.
- Jiu Tangshu, 199, lower
New Book of Tang, vol. 215 upper. "突厥阿史那氏蓋古匈奴北 ." "The Ashina family of the Turk probably were the northern tribes of the ancient Xiongnu." translated by Xu (2005)
Old Book of Tang Vol. 199 lower ","tr. "Tiele, originally a splinter race from Xiongnu"
Suishu, Vol. 84", Z" tr. "Tiele's predecessors are Xiongnu's ancestors."
Jiu Wudai Shi, Chapter 138. Original text: , Ż 種也。後魏時,號爲鐵勒,亦名 回紇。唐元和四年,本國可汗遣 使上言,改爲回鶻,義取迴旋搏 ,. Translation: Hui Hu [Uyghur], originally of Xiongnu stock. During Later Wei, they were called Tiele. They were also called Hui He. In the fourth year of the Yuanhe era, the Khan of their country sent an envoy to submit a request, and the name was changed to Hui Hu. It takes its meaning from turning round to strike rapidly like a falcon.
Turks are the greatest conquerors of all time respect from iran
علیرضا نصیرپور
Thanks brother :)
Thanks. Respect Iran🇹🇷❤🇮🇷
love İran also Persian Empire very strong
you are probably from "south azerbaijan" not iran :) we count that part to be "south azerbaijan" so clearly say that you are from there! love ya!
@@abbeyrhapsody3205 Yes, South Azerbaijan. Land of the Turks. Long live Greater Azerbaijan
Iam uzbek turk love to my all turkish brothers from india
I am an ethnic Uzbek from Turkey lol, btw I don't speak Uzbek or neither I have it culturally just my paternal bloodline is from Uzbekistan.
Indians love everything
Amair Khan Mughal Afsharid Khawarazmian Seljuk Timurids Ghazanavid qajar Safavid is from Persia not fucking turkey 🦃and Delhi and Mughal is from Pakistan or India not turkey I love turkey turkey is my brother but these is fake
@@user-bx5kj9yw5s except each other. nor facts about history
a good place to die we love each other u asshole.
And u guys first get ur facts right before teaching us.
Ok tell me what is the shape of earth? It must be flat acc to u.
lololololo
Afghanistan turkman salomlar
for all turks brothers
turkman bacha Aleykum selam kardaş
Chok yasha goney turkestan.
turkman bacha love and peace for you and afganistan people.
Salam from indonesia
Selamlar sizede kardas
turkman bacha ve aleyküm selam
Add Ghurids
I cannot conclude this head on the Ghorians without mentioning a remarkable passage found in Janabi, who calls the Ghorides Turks, whilst they are generally reckoned to \'91belong to the Afghans; if it" is not, perhaps, to be understood, that only the reigning family Was of a Turkish origin. This passage runs thus :\'97\'93 The \u64257 rst who became known of the Ghorian kings, are the descendants of Hossain; who are a race of Turlcs, that came from Khata to the mountains of Ghor. In the sequel, their affairs prospered; and they possessed themselves of countries, as it is mentioned in the History of As-of Shah, and in the Tarilch Ulmzwader of Ahmed ben Mohammed Altabrizi.\'94 The author of the Khulassat Ulansab, who is very careful in distinguishing the real Afghans from those that are either supposed or erroneously pretend to be Afghans, seems, too, to consider the Ghorian dynasty as a Turkish race: in support of which assertion, I shall insert here a passage relative to this subject :-\'97\'93
History of the Afghans/ Tarikh-i-khan jahani wa makhzan-i-Afghani
Translated from the Persian of Neamet Ullah
Part of Cambridge Library Collection - Perspectives from the Royal Asiatic Society
AUTHOR: Haravi Nimat AllahTRANSLATOR: Bernhard DornDATE PUBLISHED: June 2013AVAILABILITY: Available FORMAT: PaperbackISBN: 9781108056250
www.wdl.org/en/item/3034/view/1/304/
Chronicler: thesaurus.babylon-software.com/Nimat%20Allah%20al-Harawi
Original Work:
archive.org/details/TarikhEKhanJahaniOMakhzanEAfghaniJildEAwwal-KhwajaNematullahBinKhwajaHabeebullahAl-HarawiFarsi
In the classical Persian literary tradition - the entire vocabulary of which consists of stock phrases and images - "Turk' and 'Tajik' are stand-in terms for easily recognizable social stereotypes: one simple but violent; the other wily but civilized. Rūmi turns this on its head, however, in the following couplet: Attack upon attack came the darkness of night/Be strong like a Turk, not soft like a Tajik' (Yek hamleh va yek hamleh, āmad shab va tārīkī/chosti kon va "Torki' kon, na narmī va ‘Tājīkī'). Often ‘Turk' was also used to refer to the poet's beautiful young e(unattainable) beloved, as in the following lines from Sa'di: 'Maybe they'll tell the King/"Your Turk (i.e., your Beloved) has spilled Tajik blood" (Shayad ke be padshah begüyand/Tork-e tö berikht khūn-e Tājīk), or elsewhere, 'Show your Tajik face, not Abyssinian black/That the Heavens may obliterate the face of the Turks' (Ru-ye Tājīkāna-t benmā, tā dagh-e habash/ Asman chehre-ye Torkān yaghma'i keshad).
Since Turkic men often ‘married up’ and started families with Tajik women, the bloodlines tended to become increasingly mixed over the generations. (Recent DNA studies in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan have shown no notable genetic difference between modern Uzbeks and Tajiks.) And since children typically spent their first years within the harem, the influence of Tajik mothers in constructing the identity of their mixed-race children was surely much greater than is admitted in the patriarchal written sources of the time. Military figures in particular often made much of their tough Turkic heritage, even as they sought to demonstrate their own cultivation by speaking Persian
and patronizing Persian courtly culture. The Tajik scribes, for their part, were
naturally required to flatter their patrons, but they flattered themselves as well
in whatever subtle ways they could.
- Richard Foltz, Chapter 4, Tajiks and Turks, The Turk-Tajik symbiosis
you cant write history without Turks. one of most powerful nation on this earth. Respect.
@Giorno Turks changed all history, idiot. Renaissance, Exploration of America, these are happened just because Ottoman Turks took Silk Road and conquered İstanbul, you can call that as ''Butterfly Effect'' :)
The most powerful pseudo-patriotic people , always on rant about their ''great history'' . Not at all powerful
@@khanusmagnus577 What should we do? Shall we take our swords and shields and invade Greece?
@@khanusmagnus577 :) butthurt
@@khanusmagnus577 stop crying so much bro, it is bad for your health
Salam from KUMYK TO MY TURKIC BLOODBROTHERS
Selam Qumiq kardes. Qaysi til sizdin tilinizge en oksas? Qazaq?