It would be cool if you did an analysis of Jane Weir's "Poppith" it's really a classical marvel, and you can link it to Aeneid book 9 when Euraylus is compared to a poppy, and you can hear his ghostly voice in the playground 👍
If I'm studying events from 220-230 CE, and the earliest textual source about an event during that time was written in 370 CE by an anonymous author, would this be considered a primary source? Great video by the way! Who can I read to understand more specifically about ancient source quality, source nature / source evaluation?
It would be cool if you did an analysis of Jane Weir's "Poppith" it's really a classical marvel, and you can link it to Aeneid book 9 when Euraylus is compared to a poppy, and you can hear his ghostly voice in the playground 👍
Brillant! Thanks.
This was good. Great job.
If I'm studying events from 220-230 CE, and the earliest textual source about an event during that time was written in 370 CE by an anonymous author, would this be considered a primary source? Great video by the way! Who can I read to understand more specifically about ancient source quality, source nature / source evaluation?