Testing EXPO: AMD AGESA Profile and Aggressive Expo Profile in the BIOS. Conclusion: Aggressive Profile actually loses in gaming in margin of error loss, and I noticed some stutters with "tighter" aggressive profile. Both are running at 6000mhz, CL30 on 64GB Kit. This is why I don't like doing custom timings on AMD, you may have regress in performance and even more sluggish mouse response. Even though you will score higher in AIDA64 Memory Benchmark with tighter timings. My advice: Set AMD Expo 1 profile or AMD AGESA (identical thing but named different) and just use the kit as such.
![Comparison 3: 9950X and 7950x3D (Ready or Not: Lawmaker) RTX 4090, 64GB, Windows 11 [24H2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xiOruyra880/mqdefault.jpg)
![Comparison 3: 9950X and 7950x3D (Ready or Not: Lawmaker) RTX 4090, 64GB, Windows 11 [24H2]](/img/tr.png)
Testing EXPO: AMD AGESA Profile and Aggressive Expo Profile in the BIOS.
Conclusion: Aggressive Profile actually loses in gaming in margin of error loss, and I noticed some stutters with "tighter" aggressive profile.
Both are running at 6000mhz, CL30 on 64GB Kit.
This is why I don't like doing custom timings on AMD, you may have regress in performance and even more sluggish mouse response. Even though you will score higher in AIDA64 Memory Benchmark with tighter timings.
My advice: Set AMD Expo 1 profile or AMD AGESA (identical thing but named different) and just use the kit as such.