@@robmckennie4203 Common misconception, but that is not luck. That is your opponent failing to calculate better than you, which is just competition. One person doing something poor and the other person doing something even worse doesn't mean one person was lucky, it means that one bad player played better than another bad player. Luck in gaming is the following: Does an element of the game's design and *not* player decisions cause someone to win? Then that is luck. Chess has no design elements that fall under this category. I played a card game professionally for 5 years and that did have several random elements - cards drawn, resources available, etc. that could cause games to be lost to substantially worse players not because of decision making, but because of the nature of the game.
Really interesting point on line depth and total vision, very instructive.
"Whatever you do, you're going to lose" -- GM Ben Finegold
Except when you are playing some blitz out of boredom, then you would play Qxf7+ and then be like "oh wait there's a knight on d6"
What the hack. I didn't even see Qa2.
This is really instructive. Shows how luck can affect the game.
Explain; there is no luck in chess.
@@Jabadamazo 11:00 onwards in the video
@@Jabadamazoluck in chess is when you don't analyse but your move still works
@@robmckennie4203 Common misconception, but that is not luck. That is your opponent failing to calculate better than you, which is just competition. One person doing something poor and the other person doing something even worse doesn't mean one person was lucky, it means that one bad player played better than another bad player.
Luck in gaming is the following: Does an element of the game's design and *not* player decisions cause someone to win? Then that is luck. Chess has no design elements that fall under this category.
I played a card game professionally for 5 years and that did have several random elements - cards drawn, resources available, etc. that could cause games to be lost to substantially worse players not because of decision making, but because of the nature of the game.