So how much is too much? here is an example: I just finished a logic game successfully in my sleep and woke up! That in itself is too much I think. When I dream LG and solve the questions in my sleep, 🤣I guess that I am a little too much involved...
Well this was a great video and all but I disagree with your argument. You have very successful attorney's who never took the LSAT and are actually doing better than lawyers who've taken the LSAT. Therefore, this argument is invalid.
1. The exception to the rule doesn’t negate the rule. 2. You’re confusing a necessary assumption for a sufficient assumption; the fact that it is necessary to do well on the LSAT to be a successful lawyer doesn’t mean it’s sufficient - you could have other important traits that make you successful lawyer.
Such good advice, especially for those who need to score in the 170s to have a good shot getting into the schools they want (and for free!)
So how much is too much? here is an example: I just finished a logic game successfully in my sleep and woke up! That in itself is too much I think. When I dream LG and solve the questions in my sleep, 🤣I guess that I am a little too much involved...
you guys are cool!
All wrong I did it.
I understand at least.
Well this was a great video and all but I disagree with your argument. You have very successful attorney's who never took the LSAT and are actually doing better than lawyers who've taken the LSAT. Therefore, this argument is invalid.
References and just one or two examples are not sufficient to make a general statement...
1. The exception to the rule doesn’t negate the rule. 2. You’re confusing a necessary assumption for a sufficient assumption; the fact that it is necessary to do well on the LSAT to be a successful lawyer doesn’t mean it’s sufficient - you could have other important traits that make you successful lawyer.