MV Ever Given - why can't it be pulled out? Suez canal blocked
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ต.ค. 2024
- Mv Ever Given is blocking the Suez canal - why can't they just pull it out or dig it out? Why will this last a long time.
I will explain the problem in this video. I hope you like the video.
In the picture you see Evergreen stuck in the Suez canal.
My mother-in-law would find a way to make this my fault.
Hahahahaha
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
im sure she already has ,you just havent said the trigger word yet
Get a new mother-in-law
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
If it was so easy to pull out we wouldn’t have so many child support cases.
Fck 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Rekt 😂😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣
It is easy to pull out, which shows you how lazy some people are.
@@brocaraton You ain't never had no A 1 😸
I am so thankful that I was not responsible for this incredible mess.
Insurance Company must be freaking out about now!
The captain of the Costa Concordia would take the swap me thinks.
@@onthejob9153 oh no looks like a middle school drop out is complaining about how he cant get his anime comics 😟😟
@@kelpy9902 LOL! Excellent explanation of a Trolling whiner who didn't and couldn't explain his own... what I'm going to calling "babble math "
@@onthejob9153 It's the equation for friction of a perfectly smooth and level box hanging two thirds off of a perfectly smooth and level surface, as per high school physics.
The assumption this guy makes that this ship is like that is weird
Maybe everyone’s looking for a ship named MV “Ever-given” and that’s why they haven’t moved the “Evergreen” yet.
Dear oh dear.
It is written on the bow of the ship.
Yes I wondering that too
I saw two dudes dig an underground water park with a treehouse and a loopy loop water slide in the middle of the jungle on TH-cam. Give em a call, they’ll have em out in an hour or so
They build some crazy shit.. got to be hot as hell in them little forts.
Did you see how many views those dudes are getting? Like 75 - 100million per video. They probably arrive to this jungle spot in a chauffeur driven S Class..
@@jordanwilson3618 yeah, it’s amazing what they do, especially with not much equipment
@@lifegoeson1007the two story they built with the slide and pool was very impressive.
@@280SE right,. I wonder do they see any of the money.
I just can’t help but imagine the poor workers on the other ships calling home, “honey, honestly it’s a traffic accident.”
Yeah, they might as well just file for divorce before they hear the breaking news of what their wives are up to.
Step boat is stuck
Fun fact: If you go to Endia 🇮🇳 you'll see lots of ddirty disgusting stinky slums
Yeah India has lots of slums 🤓
Handling 20% of the worlds population is not a joke
That feeling you get when your car dies blocking traffic, but on a much larger scale.
:)
Yup 🤣😂
much much larger scale, they lost almost a billion dollar a day
The larger scale being that you have blocked realistically the only road in the world bringing a new global crisis on top of the current one...
World scale
The Ever Given has a sister ship which is powered by an electric motor. It's called the Ever Ready.
I can see Physics teachers putting this scenario in their tests 😂
LMAO!!! When he started talking, I immediately had flashbacks of what I learned in physics class.
oh god please no
RIP students 😂😂😂
Please Sir✋.. can I go to toilet..sniff..
SHHH PLEASE
"Help me, stepship. I'm stuck."
Frick
"Let's just lube up that canal"
How to delete someones comment
💀💀💀💀💀💀no chill
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I feel bad for the ppl stuck in the containers on the way to wayfair.
Please explain
@@Mob-es9jm It's a joke based on a really, really dumb conspiracy that Wayfair was selling slaves on their website in the form of overpriced goods. So you'd buy a $10,000 item that would normally cost like $200. It was an incredibly, stupidly dumb conspiracy that made no sense.
@@crazycaucasian9342 you don't happen to work for wayfair do you...? Lmfao
😂😂😂👍
@Gold Fish He bought a $10,000 foot stool and didn't get what he expected.
“I’ll pull dat sumbitch out wit my f-150 yo ! “
That’s Louisiana slang for “I should have stayed in high school”
My mother in law is one cannonball away from dislodging this ship with sheer wave force .
Tell her that the ship is effecting her toilet paper supply. Give her a little extra incentive.
Lmfao.....LMFAO
Les. Is that you? 😀
😂🤣
Damn bro. Thanks for the morning life. hhahahahahahaah
“The ships have become bigger but the technology to support them hasn’t caught up ‘“ and also the crew keeps shrinking to keep the cost down.
That, and the canal has stayed virtually the same size while container ships have grown exponentially.
Well smaller crews is a natural result of more automation and technology no?
Stop unhealthy human expansion
Crews are on standby that could bag, inflate and float the front end of that ship, but NOBODY IS CALLING THEM. Why?!!?!!?!!?
They are too big now. Too big for the canals and ports they go into. Something like this was bound to happen.
Life lesson: Don't try the three-point turn unless you have a driveway to pull into.
Why has the Suez not been made wider over the past and recent years , at least 100 meters
@@blackadder1415 the southern part of the canal is at least 15 miles long with cities, towns roads etc on both side it would be a very problematic solution to this but I believe after this more people will realize itll have to be widened
Austin Powers begs to differ
For those not Engineers: sand is self compacting, add water, then add weight. you're basically screwed.
HONESTLY THE ONLY VIDEO THAT EXPLAINS THIS PROBLEM!!!
News stations SUCK!!
Absolutely! I've been around boats and heavy equipment my whole life, and until now couldn't understand why a few tug boats weren't enough.
they absolutely do suck, the only thing they are doing is blabing about how long it would possibly take(without even mentioning any solutions) and ruining good memes
only one late model excavator working on the bow. that picture makes me wonder. no line of trucks hauling away sand.
Journalist these days are mostly activists, so that's why they suck
Yup
The simplest engineering way to dig this vessel out of it current berth is to use Venturi Jet pumps. They are used extensively in South Africa’s Deep mining operations because they are so efficient. They can dig as deep as 200 feet down, and if the walls of the hole collapse on the pump it’s simply able to carry on without being clogged, in essence creating a funnel like hole, which is exactly what is required to move this amount of sand quickly from underneath the vessel. It would likely take less than 72 hours to re-float the vessel deploying the correctly engineered Venturi bug (the thing that goes into the sand and sucks up the sand to move thousands of tons an hour) , and the super high pressure pump feeding the Venturi, all could be deployed by helicopter including the generators needed to run the pump, clearly water is not a problem so the engineering fix is relatively easy for engineers skilled in this technology.. But unfortunatly I would venture marine salvage teams have little to no experience using this technology and have yet to call on the South African experts who may well be the worlds leaders in this field by a large margin, with many years of experience move 10’s of millions tons of Sand and mud in some of the harshest and deepest working environments on the planet..
How long until hull fails? Range 1 week , months? Should they support the center somehow? Many hoses they could inflate. Need to accelerate digging.
It reminds me of the Iranian take over of the U.S. Embassy in the early 80... Israel volunteered to free the hostages as they did in Entebbe. However, Carter thought he could do a better job! He lost Iran and the Panama Canal in less than two years! Never suppose that experience can outweigh pride, ignorance, and arrogance!!!
You'd probably want several Venturi Jet pumps so that you could insure that the bow is undermined evenly. If the digging at any place under the hull lags behind too much it could create a "hill" and damage the hull. I'd also think some salvage floats and emptying the ballast tanks more could help free the ship a few hours earlier.
A question for Paul, where would the sand excavated from under the ship be discharged? Into the canal is no good unless you either have major dredges available to scoop out the sand or are able to discharge the excavated sand either into the desert well away from the canal or into a number of barges which can then haul the sand away to be dumped, probably out in the Red Sea well outside of Port Suez. Discharging into the canal will simply block the canal even after the ship is removed.
I'll try it
Its like i'm watching a Netflix Series wondering what will happen the next Episode.
Yeah, and an INTERESTING one for a change!
Because we are watching a movie. Alice is no longer in Wonderland
Spoiler. They find children in the containers. Russian Submarine goes missing, coastline is surrounded by destroyers.
th-cam.com/video/Uy5oym-qFn4/w-d-xo.html
Put a bomb and blast the ship .........it will.cost less than waiting for weeks with 400million/hr loss
When I saw the title, all I could think of was;
“That’s what she said!”
ok i think i got an idea, i'm going to need a discovery channel camera crew and some of them alaska gold miners that scuba dive... all we gotta do is tell them there gold under that ship and it'll be free in two days
@@onthejob9153 Dude, your point isn't SO good that you need to fucking spam EVERY comment you came across with a copy/paste of your reply.
Actually, suction or water jetting might just be the answer.
AG
Beautiful 💡idea 🥰😁😁😁
@@51WCDodge A hell of a lot of water jetting and Sand Dredging Pumps and how ever many Yankum Ropes it would take then use another Container Ship to hook too for the weight if it doesn't come out the first pull get a bigger run at it on the second one lol
I think 1/3 of the weight resting on the sand is too high estimation. Even if the 1/3 of the ship is resting against the sand the hull has still normal amount of buoyancy. To get 1/3 of the weight against the sand the ship should be partly out of the water so that there would be 1/3 less buoyancy left to carry the weight of the ship. And since the ship seems to be still level I think that's not the case.
they got it out
Hey
What don't they just get something like 15 tugboats to pull out the ship at an angle, and twist it out of the sand? Doing that would give you much more leverage.
I found some equations engineers have come up with to calculate the fore necessary to pull a ship like this off a sandbar. You need to break out your algebra knowledge of matrices as well as run the results of multiplying the matrices through some calculus integration. There are so many factors involved there is no way someone not involved will be able to calculate it. You need to know the actual structural layout of the ship because how much the hull is flexed matters, you need to know the sand particle size, how deep into the sand it is, and about 20 more variables. Needles to say that's just to pull a ship straight off a sand bar. This ship can't be pulled either direction. It needs to be freed up so it can be turned.
Though from my personal experience as a recovery specialist in the army pulling stuck tanks and trucks out of the mud it can take a surprisingly large amount of force to pull something out of sand/mud even if it has wheels on it. Enough force that you'd likely put a hole in the ship if you tried to force it. It all boils down to them needing to make enough room to move it or lighten the load to it floats.
I think the easiest/safest way might be to dig it out as much as possible. Then create coffer dams and a dike around the edge to pump water in and increase the water level high enough to float it in place. Lifting those intermodal containers in the field is not going to be easy, safe, or fast.
@@sikofu2 we could also just tie two spacex rockets to it and lift it out
I hope the teams working on this are paying close attention to the many brilliant suggestions from the internet.
How did WWII last five years? If the internet had been around, it wouldn't have gone past a week. The world is FULL of geniuses living in their parent's basement.
@@bentnickel7487 I doubt that. One idiot thinks two tanks can pull it out.
Well after tonight’s high tide they are gonna start unloading it if not free. Lol
@@Tarheel13 I was being sarcastic. Apparently, you didn't get it.
Pipe high pressure water into the ground where the ship is beached. Sand will undergo liquification. The sand will flow away from the area more efficiently than if you had a special excavator. You can suck up and filter the water in the area to relocate the sand, or toss it onto a section of the bank covered in 0.5-1meter sized gravel and it'd naturally filter the sand out. Small gravel drainway would prevent shore erosion from this method. Sure I may be a denizen of the internet, but I love engineering and I'm about to graduate under physics.
Thank you 😃 this is this best explanation I have heard👍🏼
The pic of the excavator next to the ship sums it up pretty well. It's staggering how big those container ships are.
(wheel loader)
correction excavator Kun is having a hard time getting ever given chan out off the shore cause she's so big.
@@kayjay4060 There's a know-it-all in every crowd. STFU
@@kayjay4060 Haha yea, It reminds me more of viral towing fail videos than fixing a $9 billion/day trafick jam... 😂
If I risked losing that much I'd send all the dragline excavators and scrapers, trucks and cranes I could find. The content in some of those containers is probably worth more then that excavator haha.
@@richardjones2455 what a poor reply. It is clearly visible that you are an expert in this and many other fields...
They never thought this would happen !! Shows how fallible we are even when it comes to engineering marvels
It's bizzare because I'm sure someone brought up the question "What if a boat gets stuck in there?" because there's two canals north of the lake to minimise this exact issue.
Titanic wasn't supposed to sink either.
It's intentional.
@@frankh.3849 how so
@@kaibe5241 why would they block that canal intentionally? In my opinion "they" needed the canal shut down so "they" could gain access to the submarine cable hub without a lot of eyes watching what "they" are doing. The "they" is still undetermined, multiply global elite groups will profit greatly during the interim simply because they do not let a good crisis go to waste. This goes deeper than disruption of food and material supplies, this was intentionally to shut down that canal.
Hold on, I saw this in pirates of the caribbean. We need a bunch of crabs.
Save us oh mighty crustaceans, our need is desperate and this ship too damn thicc.
*THICC*
Thicc
Thicc
Thicc
Thicc
We did it after only six days .. we are Pharoahs man
And Boskalis from the Netherlands?
Tony Beets from Alaska would have that thing out in a 12 hour shift if it kept him from mining gold lol
No lol
Tony Beets would make it f@&$#€¥ happening
Tony got this no problem!! 😎
Tony bates is Dutch. The salvage team is .... Dutch.
'We gotta get this #@%%& thing movin' out of the ¤¤¤% way! I'll send in my crew with the dreeeeeedge #¤% tomorrow, get the job done in "¤%#" notime!'
Why not dig 200 yards ahead of the “nose” of the ship then breach the wall of the canal? With a strong pull to the rear as well as the ships power plus the liquefaction of the sand might mitigate the friction and allow for substantial less friction to dislodge the ship.
SIGN HIM UP!
Woah woah woah buddy don't go thinking about stuff and telling these geniuses how to do their job because you might have a damn good idea. It just makes to much sense for 2021.
Why not just pull it with another freaking container ship the offshore oil and gas industry does this same kind thing every single day, those engineers have obviously never got a 4wheel drive truck stuck in the local mudhole lol
Monday morning quarterbacks?
top choppers water works differently than land.
PLOT TWIST: The ship is not stuck at all. This is just a gigantic month long Evergreen ad that everyone is forced to watch.
Not sure if that marketing team would stick around for much longer
actually its europeans trying to sell their products by blocking the route from asia :=).
@@schuttrostig5729 not everything that ever happens is a freakin conspiracy theory
Evergreen won't need advertising at all. Well, by now, everyone knows them anyway.
🤣 This is more like a marketing and pr nightmare than an ad. If you need a conspiracy twist, how about this is a plot that the Evergreen competitors ganging up to jeopardize the company or a ransom threat by a terrorist group?
Title: "Why can't they pull it out?"
Me: "Do you have an idea how big that thing is..."
They did pull it out.
Yeah, but if they did it the regular way it would have just ripped a huge hole in the hull. It was super weird with like four tugs on one side, four on the other, and a couple up top. Everything was tightly coordinated. You are correct though. They did pull it out lol.
Finally, some intelligent analysis of the situation. Please do updates as events proceed.
If you ever thought you had a bad day at work, be thankful you’re not the captain of this vessel!
Or the helmsman
You mean ... ex-captain !
Pretty sure it was the female egyptian canal pilot who did this. Captain has responsibility for the ship of course, but the one at the helm apparently swerved around like they were drunk even before entering the canal.
I want to praise this captain...
@@OnlyKaerius blah blah blah...female
'Oh no, I'm stuck. Step-ship, i need your help'
Search up ever given rule34
*COPIED COMMENT*
*ÇÖPÎËD ÇØMMÊÑT*
Cringe and overused
@@forfarme you're cringe and overused
I started watching this and then realised that I actually don't really care 🤷♂️
But you cared enough to make a comment, lol 🥱
At this point it might just be easier to just dig a new canal around the ship.
😄
nope the reason why there is ONLY one part here is because they couldnt put a second portion in without having to spend 30 billion dollars (70's dollars) to literally make a set of locks that would be longer than the COMPLETE canal system is long ...
.
want it out ... empty it ... and pull it ... or cut it apart right there .... I can think of 20 or 30,000 somallians that would have that ship gone in a few days .... and I do mean GONE ... not a trace of it or anything that was on it ...
@@0623kaboom Yes but how much does a ship like that cost? Thats a pretty large ship.
@@0623kaboom Your 20 or 30,000 somallians idea is the best of all.
@@0623kaboom Super idea - there are so many poor people there, they will empty these containers in no time. Let them do it already!!
"It's loaded, hard and too deep inside to pull it out" I mean that's understandable in all such similar scenarios.
Just call me Suez ❤
That’s what she said
nyan
@@CrocsGaming615 was just about to type that.
@@mikedmitriyenko6992 Mike, c'mon. You are dirty. I go to church every Sunday.
Back in the day, I operated a ship docking tug in San Francisco Bay....There was a bay pilot who used to work drunk a good bit...and once, when I was following him back up back from where I assisted his departure, he turned right after passing under the San Mateo Bridge. Being who he was, I didn't bother to interrupt his error, (it was a done deal by the time the ship started swinging anyway) and he piled into the sandbank that 'everybody knows about'. It was only a 500' ship, though loaded with scrap iron.....four Crowley 9's (9000 hp) tried to get him off, but it did indeed take weeks and a spring high tide to do so. That ship in the Canal is going nowhere real soon...-Veteran '66-68
Dig a new canal around it
if we work hard together with a crazy amount of earthmovers it could work maybe..
Crazy times we are living in with the virus and stuff and now this..
What's next ??? an asteroid ???
@Tur Horeb
That's a good idea...
@@brpitrepeters7983 Don't Jinx it
im beginning to understand just how stuck this thing really is
@Tur Horeb no. I could explain why but I know the guy talking in the video did just fine.
You all are thinking too deeply. Approximately 1/3 of the ship is stuck in the sand, yes? Remove all of the cargo and saw that part off and then just lift it up since less weight. I know, I know my genius truly frightening.
Can’t be pulled out because all the experts are busy commenting on TH-cam..
Yes, I borrowed that
@TwentyEighthParallel TH-cam is always good for a laugh when it comes to this kind of stuff!
@Jorgy 6BT..don't forget to give it back.
@@jenibaby1832 I should....but won’t 😜
Yeah it's actually annoying how people think that they are the only intellectuals around and people with years of experience in the field are fools!!
@TwentyEighthParallel hahaha that was funny 😄
This is a much bigger problem than I originally thought
I agree because of the weight on top with the Cargo Containers, sounds like the bottom of Ship Buried in Sand.
@@stevenrimer8159 But it's SAND, not rock or even gravel. Sand--that stuff that washes away VERY EASILY. Bring in the fire departments and have them put their water nozzels under the bow. Start blowing that sand out.
@@mypronounismaster4450 right? This should be nothing for the worlds best engineers
@@mypronounismaster4450 I've just said the same , blow compressed air into the sand .
@@michaelczarnomski1851 and @joe butlersnr
I think I've found some pretty solid evidence why the ship is not being removed by compressed air and the world's best engineers...
th-cam.com/video/t5IKbYcLgQA/w-d-xo.html
It looks huge, but people don't realise until you have been up close on a ship this size that is fully loaded you can't feel the genuine size of this monster.
It has 20,000 containers on it!!!
@@montestu5502 and most are 40 feet long.
Just look at the tractor trying to dig out the bow, and look at the size of the hull.
The tractor looks like a Matchbox toy.
@@montestu5502 It's closer to about 7.000 40" containers - just count the rows, columns, and layers. The 20.000 figure is an arbitrary 'standardized' measure for a certain volume not corresponding to actual real world containers. A bit like the whole weird imperial system...
If the hull were to start bending the ship would topple over.
Title:
Michael Scott: That's what she said
U know the feel when your car shuts off and ur keeping up the traffic in front a crossing with green lights? Imagine how the capt of this ship is feeling like holding up the entire worlds trading. LoL
I once stalled my compact car after exiting a freeway. I totally know what she’s going through.
Funny thing is one of their trucks also blocked the road. Search up evergreen truck to see it
Only 10% of global trade passes through the Suez canal
@@bradg5823 and that's a couple hundred million an hour down the drain the longer that ship stays there
@@JapethSierra nice meme
Give me a lever and a place to stand and I could move the world. - Archimedes
Archimedes, please, help.
I would like somone to do the maths on that..
My guess is it would be a huge fulcrum and a lot of weight..
One thing you have to consider is where to pull. The tremendous amount of force needed to pull the ship out can tear the ship apart.
"..a lever long enough.."
@@roywrogers2900 Why don't you ask god?
The fact that you can’t dig sand vertically could help if they could pump jets of water around the bow to blast or wash the sand away since they can’t dig it.
The use of high pressure water jets is nothing new to the Egyptians. They used water jet hoses to clear gaps in the sand wall located on the eastern bank of the canal. This was done as part of the surprise attack against Israel, at the start of the Yom Kippur war.
That is exactly the thing I just said.
Gotta be a bigger reason it’s still being left there......
@@leidersammlung6955 I think your right , there is more to it than meets the eye. The canal is so vital to the economies of so many countries . I can't believe that the Egyptians have no contingency plan for such an eventually.
Blowing the sand into the canal just burries it deeper.
Liquify the sand from underneaththe bow. Push pipes underneath the bow and pump air and water through them in order to add space and water to the compacted sand.
Well produced video with succinct analysis. Well done.
*Finally world trade recovering*
*Crew - Hold my ship*
The captain drew a dick with the GPS before going into the channel. Apparently they asked for a payrise and where refused.
Savage 😂
It’s free now, according to the latest news.
It isn’t yet
Only partially
Did they pull it out ?
@@boredinlife1461 no its fully pulled out now news broke about an hour ago
@@nowthatsasupplydrop751 bruh
1:06 Okay so 12% of world trade rests upon on how fast this guy can dig the ship outta the mud
Edit: Why is there always some weirdo talking about irrelevant and conspiracy topics in every conversation? Jesus people please, can anyone be fucking normal in this day and age?
Mans lost millions of dollars
@@kikinesto5125 Dude, 400million PER HOUR
@@kikinesto5125 trillions not millions
Don’t be ridiculous. Ships are already rerouted along the old route, around Africa, along which all cargo between East Asia and Europe used to travel. Travel time goes up from ca 25 days to ca 35. Always remember that the bread and butter of the major news networks is scaring the shite out of you to make you addicted to newspapers.
@@BAGPULAINTAT Not trillions. The estimated cost is at most $10 billion/week. It would have to be stuck for two years to cost a trillion dollars.
You explained this like no news channel could! Great video
Ever Given? More like Never Givin'. Because the products on that ship won't be delivered any soon.
But its fucking ever green
@@lostsquirrel788 so it's a little painful, but the actual name of the ship is Ever Given, but the company name is written on the side... Hence EverGreen
Edit:
Sources for all those who can't be bothered to take five seconds on Google:
www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=amp.abc.net.au/article/100027880&ved=2ahUKEwi_24vHotHvAhVydc0KHQ2HAkMQFjAiegQINRAC&usg=AOvVaw1Ht7M87c5HoJnKf8K9e3Ws&cf=1&cshid=1616876102135
www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ever_Given&ved=2ahUKEwi_24vHotHvAhVydc0KHQ2HAkMQmhMwAnoECAUQAg&usg=AOvVaw3Gj7HI2SzX_Wa5bHgtUmd0&cshid=1616876187882
It's evergreen
@@tso4569 please tell me you have a source and you don't just claim something you thought as a fact
@@tso4569 you're right here's a like 👉🤠👈
In this section the canal is about 700' wide. The ship is about 1300' long. However, The channel is only about 350' wide at the most. At least a quarter of the ship is stuck at each end. From the photos of the shore-side excavator the soil isn't just sand but a clay/sand mix. The bow is buried at least 20-25' into the bank. There's going to be suction as well as friction to deal with. Even when they get it clear, the canal's capacity is 76 ships per day and there are about 3-400 ship waiting to go through. Plus, getting the Evergiven free is bound to pull a lot of debris into the ship channel so there will be dredging needed before full operations resume. If they can get it free by March 30, the best case scenario, it will take at least another week to get caught up. Quite possibly it won't be until mid-April before it's all back to normal. That's when the fines and lawsuits start. That will probably last until 2030.
It should be imploded this month after the crew has gone & most of the cargo is unloaded. The worth of the vessel far, far less than the cost of permitting it to remain in place for weeks.
Yep. Personally I think it’ll take several more weeks.
They seriously need to widen the canal to make things like this less probable given how much bigger these ships have become.
I doubt that this is the first time such a long & heavily loaded ship has gone through the Suez Canal. Once it's been done successfully once, there's no reason that can't be repeated ad infinitum, no matter how windy it ever gets on the Canal.
They (Egypt) should have widened this section back when they were doing the renovations on this canal. Or ban large container ships. Which will it be... I predict they won't do anything because they love the money.
At 1:39 am ET the New York Times published the following update!!!
"The mammoth cargo ship blocking one of the world’s most vital maritime arteries was wrenched from the shoreline and set partially afloat again early on Monday morning, raising hopes that traffic could soon resume in the Suez Canal and limit the economic fallout of the disruption. Salvage teams, working on both land and water for five days and nights, were ultimately assisted by forces more powerful than any of the machines that rushed to the scene to assist in the rescue: the moon the tides. As water levels swelled overnight, the hours spent digging and excavating millions of tons of earth around the Ever Green paid dividends as the ship slowly regained buoyancy, according to officials. While shipping officials and Egyptian authorities cautioned that the complicated operation was still underway, they expressed increasing confidence the ship would soon be completely free. Images on social media showed tugboat crews celebrating the victory in the predawn hours."
I just feel how lucky that ship was which was given permission to go ahead of this Ever Given ship in the entrance of the canal before this accident.
Evergreen belongs to clinton foundation.
Most likely I'd be the person stuck behind it. I've been through the canal 3 times in the Navy on an aircraft carrier (the 4th time I was on emergency leave and missed it). It takes a while to get through it. As big as my carrier was (I was on the Enterprise), it's is nowhere near as big as this ship.
@@jimmym3352
The Enterprise's 342' is darn close and tonnage is very close to Evergreens 200K lbs. These ships amaze me.
Nah?
@@emerald9578 yes, the evil ones 100% they need culling for sure
"stepbro, im stukk"
~EverGreen
You mean "EverGiven""
It's quite amazing how narrow this extremely important canal is and how all these years it remained incident-free.
After seeing this video I wonder how ships never had accidents here.
This size must be banned from entering the Suez Canal including Capt Schettino..
well you have to be sober and on alert to captain a ship in resent years, and there is usually not only 1 in charge
Nah, the limit is 50 ships a day. To send more goods you have to have bigger ships
Use water dynamite to blow the sand dumes away and the vessel will pop up free. Water dynamite, yes invent it or adapt, something like hard water balls.
The ships used to be much smaller.
“Help us Godzilla, you’re our only hope.”
He's too busy fighting King Kong
lol
you are confusing Obi-Wan with Godzilla.
Hahhahahahahahahahahah
We can always use King Kong for the off load 😂
They need some Mat's Offroad Recovery ropes. That'll get 'em out.
as long as eds there giving the weather, well be fine
@@gilstewart4069 ???
Lets just hook up the banana to the ship and give it a good yank
Yup, contact YankUm for a Really BIG rope. Then attach it to the nuclear icebreaker the soviets have and ...
LOL. I know if I see the yellow banana in Egypt, everything will be A-OK.
Patrick Starr “We take the boat, and we PUSH IT somewhere else!”
Dig a hole beside it with a dredger, then use hydro blasting to push the sand out from underneath and into the newly dug hole. Thank you, this has been my Ted talk
getting the required machines and setting it up will take months
@@oksowhat Maybe not with the Antonov.
Actually sounds like a good idea .
I was thinking the same thing they could adapt a hydro hose system to a track hoe and a big pump and Wash all the sand loose.
We have to understand that any object that gets stuck in the soil and covered with water has a force from both ends. So the object wont push back unless it is a floating object. Now the ship has lost her floating ability as she has embedded her front and rear sides in the soil. Only way is to use the same water force to turn the ship after digging both ends to have more room and unload the heavy containers to reduce the weight. Water pressure can give either by explosion few meters away to create heavy waves like tsunami or increase water flow from one side.May be it will help her to turn back.
“Why can’t it be pulled out”
Because it Chonky
it big boi
She is very *THICC* (insert lenny face here)
@@nascar427 if you can contact and make agreement with that warship.
@@nascar427 dude it’s not that easy, also you have to think about costs and diplomacy and then giving them something in return, there isn’t a lot of space in the canal, plus security plus the waterline of the ship. But hey sounds like a cool idea that could work, I’ll try to do more research in it,.
I wonder why did no one foresee this problem? With the sizes of those ships something like this was bound to happen, sooner or later
They wait till a problem happens and people lose out on money before they consider doing anything
What would they have done to be proactive to something like this?
@@desertmulehunter widen the canal? maybe tugrail pulling the ship from land like panama does? i would guess mandatory gps stearing could at least lessen the impact. dig a second canal like in the north, at least there would be no complete blockage. reinforce the banks so it would not have dug so deep into the sand and would be more easy to pull...just some 30sec ideas from someone having nothing to do with ships and canals...
Gee I dunno quick research into can the major canals handle our dumbass ideas of building giant ships
Kind of a common sense why build the fastest car if you have no where to drive it sort of thing
@@karlmorzy5959 more money then brains there are a lot of folk who far under this category. Edit: Fall not far
Can you explain why they can't make barriers and pumps to lift it with the water it actually is in? Is there any way to use provisory barriers around the ship sunked part and than pump water on it as if it there was no tomorrow? Sorry about my english.
1........5...........2...........0..........3..........3........7...........6..........4............0........5. W........ H.........A.........T......... S......... A.........P
☝️☝️
With vessels getting longer and larger, it's time to widen the canal which is longgggg overdue.
Or just dredge it properly, regularly, and reinforce the banks with concrete. The desert always reclaims. Egypt is a horrific operator.
Or manufacture more stuff domestically, you know, dont let imports kill your economy
All the workers are too busy buying Bitcoin.
The dual canal system is what needs to be done, honestly.
1) It doubles normal operating capacity
2) If a ship becomes stuck, the loss is 50% capacity rather than 100%. Fewer ships have to divert. Some still will need to do that and go around Africa, but then at least critical cargo could be taken into account and choices made.
None of these are cheap projects. None are easy. None are done without a very long timeline for completion. All cause disruption in maritime traffic that accommodates literally trillions of dollars of trade annually. Step 1 has to be that second canal. The designers of the increasingly large super tankers should really consider their use case before the drop billions on a new ship that can't cross major trade channels or can't use major ports of call because they're simply too big.
@@kma3647 I agree, in a vacuum. However, geography usually restricts this. Building canals in sand often isn’t possible.
I can’t wait for internet historian to make a video about this.
Same to me lol
But if he gonna make the video, it's mean this situation is gonna be as bad as Concordia disaster, which better hope it's not going to happen.
@@Cocacolucarasol869
I mean people died in the Concordia and this seems more of a problem of engineering of the actual ship than pure stupidity.
I imagine this is probably going to be a shorter video but still gonna be great
Ancient aliens lol
Wait another 5 years
Weekend warrior is pretty good
"Why can't you just pull it out".....that's what she said 🙄
😜🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Wrong hole😲😂😂😂😂
@@fw2699 does anyone have a towel?🙄😂
Nice
lol
the pilot had an aww shit moment. bet the regular Captain is happy to have the designated driver that day.
Also, removing the ballast is not required, in fact could make matters worse when the ship is freed,
On the other hand, this could be looked at as a genius revenge of a disgruntled captain or a criminal mastermind 😂😂😂
Or someone who was paid to create an incident by an industry in need of a price increase due to significant reduction in sales volume in the 12 months ... like petrol.
or a drunk pilot,
@@dabouras
In that case he was not paid to do it.
He was chosen.
LOL I just said to myself I wonder if this was deliberatly done.
@@dapto234
On the other end as Napoleon Bonaparte once said :
"Never ascribe to malice that which can adequately be explained by incompetence."
But, this was before modern capitalism, money is the key to almost everything.
Got my fingers crossed that my mountain bike I ordered isn't on board
Next time don’t order a cheap mtn bike and you won’t have to worry.
@@timmyotoole7312 LMAO
You should be ashamed for not buying American....
Dorian Gray I will cross my other fingers and hope your maxi pads made it through the canal
Been waiting for big shipment of plastic christmas trees since last Dec.,now they're even more late,maybe next Dec.now.
Maybe they will need to rename the ship to MV Never Going.
& why do they keep saying 'Ever-given' when it's EverGreen?
@@kathiemx4925 The company is Evergreen but the ship itself is called "Ever Given". The name of the ship can be seen in small type at the top of the front corners of the ship.
why MV ? i get the vessel but what m stands for ?
@@pantelisvidakis9005 mv stands for motor vessel
@@kathiemx4925 the company has pattern in their ship naming like ever faith, ever glory ,ever gifted etc.
Ever given´s nose is not at 15 meters deep at the moment. You can see that in the picture at 1:14. Around 1/3 of the nose is above the water surface. so nose is at 8 or 9 meters deep instead of 15. The bad thing with Suez canal; Canals width at its surface is wider than width of the bottom. So if we say; the canal is 300 meters wide at its surface, the bottom is like 200 meter or less. I don´t know why. they know better.
I think it would be easier to unload the ship so other vessels can save it.
Using high-pressure water around the front of the vessel will release the suction and friction from underneath allowing the Far Samson to pull it out. Work smarter not harder!
Explosives will do the same thing lot less work
@Helen Pauls not really if its small explosives will work without any damage.
@Helen Pauls Two kilotons or so ought to work. Look at Beirut.
@Helen Pauls I got no idea all I know is I was watching a company in lovell wy. Pull a stuck d10 dozer out of the mud with a 150 ton hydraulic winch and it was slipping so the old man operator took a tool that looked like a ice auger and drill drilled and placed four half sticks of dynamite under the track buy about 3" and wired and them started pulling and then set them off the explosion wasn't even very loud mud probably flew 3 to 4 ft in the air and the dozer started moving he said the explosion broke the suction of the mud I got no idea if this would help with a ship stuck in sand but it aint going to hurt much if done by professionals
@@jaggsta Water is uncompressible. That ship would crumple quick.
You can “liquify” the soil using vibrating equipment with some sort of rods that would be driven into the soil. This would in theory release the ship from the bank of the canal. Similar to how they get the air bubbles out of concrete in molds just on a much larger scale
In dry sand this would work, but wet sand isn't going to respond the same way, at least not we'll enough to free the ship. Hard to aerate wet sand, especially underwater sand. ;)
Wow! You're so smart 👍
Of course. Technical means are readily available. This is rather a "Thug of war"...
Drill a pipe shaft (or multiples) from shore underneath/nearby the front of the ship. Then add crates of c4. Then, its blasting time.. and hopefolly it loosens enough with at the same time using multiple tugboats at the back? :)
In unrelated news, Suez canal will be widened 600 feet starting next week
Lol okay
It would make more sense in meters.
Lol XD
people.... use google you lazy balls
182.88m
Today's lesson : don't watch initial d when you're driving a big ass ship
"Armchair engineer" here...
Dig a big hole into the bank around the bow.
Use hoses to blow the sand around the bow into the hole and dredge sand out of hole.
The weight of the ship will cause most of the sand under the bow to move sideways so that it can be removed by pressure hose.
It will be far easier to bring in a bunch of large pumps in than dredge ships.
And they have already started to excavate the bank around the bow so just carry on with a modified version of that tactic.
Bravo... no need to be lot of smart to realize that solutions they showed to us are useless and diging from out of water isnt solution at all... so I have right to think that ship isnt there stoped by accident
I had exactly the same thought. My guess would be, that you would not even have to remove all the sand. You only have to remove it on the sides, and get it in a soft state underneath the ship.
What you're describing is basically a water jetting operation. Use water to blow the sand away from the hull.
It didn’t take long to find a solution in the YT comments. I am never disappointed with the great ideas that are presented to problems!
Hydro-vac just blasts water and sucks up all sorts of shit. Call badger daylighting they’ll be over ASAP to do it. The boys would love the trip!
"The Suez Canal is going to be closed for some time going forward"
*3 days later*
The ship has been pulled out and the canal is open
lol
The Dutch saved the day again :-)
@@ikbenvrij I predicted it would be free in a few days with tugs and dredging... with or without the Dutch!
@@ikbenvrij there were 14 tugboats total, 2 of which with pulling capabilities "combined" equal , actually higher than that of, the Dutch tagboat. The dredging work lasted for 4-5 days , so it took too long because of the dredging not because they were waiting for the Dutch tagboat to come & pull. AND the operating co of the Dutch tagboat said the operation will take weeks..if the Dutch tagboat was as super as your claim, why would its operator say that?
Say Dutch tagboat helped in this but what you said proves that some of you Westerns are a bubble! Love to claim the hard work of others to yourselves, so greedy 😄
@@AA-cr5we no no no you got it all wrong sir, it was all due to the Dutch expertise man. ;-) we smoll country
Send those guys from India, they'll have it broke down in a week.
@@AMD1 hey im also from BD
It is manned by an Indian crew! Ironic?
Hahaha good one . From india btw .
@Kanwalnoor Singh Hundal your life
China would definitely have completed the job within a day.
I am curious.. How much do those two giant anchors and chains weigh? I was thinking if maybe they dropped the anchors and ran out all the chain it would help lighten the front. Surely that would be that same as removing quite a few containers from the front.
Tomorrows news will be like: "Another ship got stuck in the Panama Canal".
Careful what you wish for
Can’t happen. The Panama canal is reinforced, properly dredged, and moves ships under shore control, via rail tugs. The Suez is a dump compared to the Panama Canal. Truly a third world sand trap.
If we lose the Panama Canal AND the Suez Canal we are fucked
You just watch, that's exactly what I too am expecting. They need to hook off immediately around the capes. Not waste time waiting to get through.
@@afcgeo882 It worked fine for over 100 years. The Panama canal is super complicated, you have several locks that need to raise ships 48m above sea level and down again. The Suez canal will be fine once they finish the second lane.
I think one advantage is that it is a canal. You can pull it from other bank by using cables rather than using the tug boats. Will definitely give more power than pulling it from water.
IDK. It’s all sand. It’s not really a stable platform to pull from.
It's already in contact with the other bank! Where are you going to pull it "to"???
And if you pull it from the same side of the canal (as the side that the bow is stuck into) you'll put massive twisting forces on the bow that is deeply embedded in the bank, so it's not just "aground", it is truly _stuck._
That is quite a good idea. Like they did in Pearl harbor with the capsized battleships.
Might take some time to build such a construction though.
correct . excavate and bury land anchors and use land based winches pulling at 30 degrees from opposite sides of the canal combined with dredging underneath the hull . its still alot of machine hours but its achievable.
agreed. attach however many cables it would take to pull from the stern with a few tractors ( to pull it opposite of the original direction) and a tug boat at the starboard bow of the ship to point her back to position as its being pulled back. to much head scratching and not enough action.
We send robots (and soon humans) to Mars, but can't pull one ship from a canal. 😅
We can/could but don’t have the machinery and plans ready. This sort of thing does not happen often enough to justify an entity to create a turn key solution.
What’s funny is you think that there is a place called Mars and we’ve sent things there😂🤣
@@DaGSlM2015 Is there an echo in here?
@@DaGSlM2015 Space may be the final frontier but it's made in a Hollywood basement. -Red Hot Chili Peppers
Wow. If you believe that song, I guess you think hollywood has been in existence for thousands of years now?
The narrow canal makes it difficult to use many towboats - as correctly said in the video. However the narrow canal also means that there is land close to the ship's stern, where is is relatively easy to install many land-based towing winches and pull the ship from the oposite side of the land. With a quick search i found that winches with pulling force of 600 tones (www.kongsberg.com/maritime/products/deck-machinery-and-cranes/deck-machinery/tug-vessels/towing-winches-tugs/) are available, so a number of 55 winches is required to achieve the total pulling force of 33000 tons. Not a small number but significantly less than the 80 Far Samson vessels. And certainly there is enough space on land to install them (perhaps there are even bigger winches available). In any case this is trully a difficult task.
This guy wins the "So what did you get fired for?"
It was a woman captain 😂🤣😂
.
.
.
.... no seriously, it was a woman.
@@RubberDucky8734 omg 😂💀
@@RubberDucky8734 wow, now not even a metoo movement can save her now
@@RubberDucky8734 funny how you believe everything you see on the internet
Fake news, look it up and don’t spread bullshit
Who's insurance is covering this?!
Jake stopped answering their calls.
Like a good neighbor, stay over there
The one about to go bust! :-)
They need flo not jake 😎
@@driprubies2464 Flo would totally bundle that. 😂
Probably going to be USA tax payers Dems like handing out our money.
I read that the stern is aground too. The propellers, the shafts and the rudders are buried as well from the ships stern swinging sideways during the grounding. The ships mid section will be under extreme stresses during low tide, if it's not already based on being grounded at both ends. The ships hull was not designed for such stresses.
It is my amateur opinion that this vessel is already being scheduled to go to the wreckers. If not, i think it will be extremely difficult to get any insurance on it in the future.
Also they will have to remove the cargo containers from the middle of the ship first to prevent sagging and they have to hope that the constant raising and lowering of the tide won't break her back.
they should play the titanic soundtrack onboard on repeat. at some point when it breaks apart, it will set the perfect tone like you in a real life movie set as the ship sinks. would make an awesome youtube clip too or tiktok
Don't use the plural. It is one shaft, one propeller, one 11-cylinder in-line 2-stroke diesel engine. There is no clutch or shift, you reverse by reversing the direction of rotation of the engine.
@Suzanne Melanson Pumping out the fuel and ballast while the deck is fully loaded has its own risks - it might come free and immediately roll over.
Thank you for the explanation and your time
The other end is in the sand also. The propellers are definitely buried. It appears this thing was steered into running its nose into the edge and the current of the water just happened to be flowing in such a way as to wedge it in. Almost as though it were done on purpose.
Or accident
War strategy?
Everything that has happened the last couple of years that negatively impact our life on earth has been done on purpose
What is the motive?
Don;t usel the plural "propellers." Like most cargo ships, it is a single screw ship and you reverse it by reversing the rotation of the 2-stroke diesel engine that is the main plant. They supposedly have to 2,500 h.p bow thrusters.
That picture with excavator is good motivational poster - "just dig!"
It's a great photo. It summed up the issue in one picture and on the very first day. It's everything a good news photo should be.
If this were in China, they would have dug quadruple canals years ago.
Here's something that might help, get the silt and mud in suspension in the water. This will raise the average density of the water helping the ship float better. Won't work on its own, but it might help
Dory: "Just keep digging! Just keep digging!"
Can you dig it?
We have people here in South Africa that can hijack and empty a truck within minutes
should take them about 2 days to clear out every container on that ship
Shiid need them boys in the states
They will use container's as spaza shops .fully eguiped
Really? SA must be f***kd up real bad!
At this time, I wonder if Mandela was as effective as he is advertised to be.
🤣🤣🤣
@@henniebredenhann2533 Government shuts them down saying it's tobacco containers...
What was their velocity when they ran aground? How quickly did that dust storm arise? Wouldn't trying to greatly reduce speed and even trying to stop, drop anchor and call for tug boat support be standard operating procedure for such a ship in the canal in a dust storm?
Billions in trade traversing this facility daily, and nobody wanted to spend a couple hundred grand to come up with a plan for solutions to identify what happens when a boat gets stuck...??? Okay...
There should be laws that prevent boats longer than the narrowest part in the canal from going in. Cheaper to send theee fuckers around than having the whole trade route stop.
@@nobytes2 if you are fine paying more for stuff to be delivered to your country ok but I'm not (if laws like this get implemented the companies are not gonna lose a single cent they are just gonna adjust their prices accordingly and you will end up paying for both fines and delays in shipment)
@@ivanemilov522 You're comment is ignorant af. This catastrophe will cost billions if not trillions as it is. So whether you like it or not you will have to pay increase shipping for a while in some way. The law should be simple, send big ships around that do not contain emergency shipping. This is just for big ships which I am sure there isn't many. Is cheaper to send some around, than have another one stuck.
@@nobytes2 you sound like you are gonna make the law and it's so simple to make a law regarding international trade (12% of it)
@@ivanemilov522 Well now you have 0% trade going in or out. You do understand that alone is going to cause prices in the entire world to go up, right?
"I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
See, Ripley had the right idea back in 1986.
"The nose" lol does he means the bulbous bow? that containership is a flat bottom vessel
And where the hell did he come up with his Weird mathematical equations "1/3 of the vessel means you need to pull 50% of 1/3" what the hell is he talking about? Does that formula take to account the substrate of the channel? 🤔
This guy just made all this stuff up to get views
@@onthejob9153 More on his math, most cars a well over a ton so the ship isn't equivalent to 200000 cars.
@@feez357 Maybe he means European cars 🤣
astonishing sight to behold
@@onthejob9153 That is quite a good ear you have now just work on the mind. Those numbers that you you heard were speaking a language that is important for you to comprehend. Good luck with that and yes... this entire story is bullshit
I wonder if high volumes of water could be pumped deep into the sand at the bow of the ship, causing the sand to liquify into an emulsion in that area.
Great thinking. I too was contemplating something similar. Everyday all over the world sewers are cleaned using high pressure water jets (around hydraulic pressure 2500~3500 psi). a) So I'm guessing that there probably isn't much rock under the vessel, but who knows for sure. b) We have an endless supply of water. c) Hi pressure water hoses are fairly flexible and can be connected in considerable length to directly target the problem areas. As well as removing the sand and other materials away from the hull the high pressure water would help to brake the stiction (think of pulling your rubber boots out of the mud) that is holding either end of the vessel from moving. I think that the Smit salvage team could cobble something together using smaller vessels to maneuver in close proximity to the Ever Given that are outfitted with the above setup. It will be interesting to see what transpires over the next few days /weeks. Definitely the options for what ever they come up with are limited to the space in the canal that they have to work in.
@ you can't raise the canal's water because this is not like panama, where you have floodgates. another reason is that the canal don't have high walls
I was thinking something like that, too. Use hoses to create a current to erode away the bank around the ship.
China's engineers are experts at that procedure!
@@DerailedThought I believe this would work the best. Use the water around it going through massive pumps to erode the soil. Its pretty high in the air actually. Gonna be real interesting to see how this plays out.
Don't dig blast with high water and suction. Barges can use std high capacity pumps. Fill ballast in back compartments to make stern heavy. Its not as big a problem as you think.
It will take as much time to put the logistics together as the freeing up of the vessel. Aussie Jeff
They could offload the front first taking weight from the buried hull. As the stern sinks lower, the bow rises. Add pneumatic lifting bags under the bow, then teams of tugs to get it rocking side to side. The vessel uses its own props to slowly back out.
Yeah it'll take some time, but that's how to do it.
Simplistic but not practical. I think second guessing world wide engineers who specialize in this horror is absurd.
Shit I just said the same thing! I should've read the comments first lol.
@@judyscheiber3661 then you know nothing because even the dumbest person could come up with a plan better then most with a piece of paper. He is correct, they made matters worse by trying to push it in the beginning. Air bags and even hook some tugs or whatever to the ass and pull it out the way it went in. Not rocket science
@@judyscheiber3661 And where is your informed answer or solution, at least he came up with something
@@tkozlofable that's exactly what I was thinking. Makes sense to pull from the tail as that's the path it took to get stuck while shifting the weight to the back
My idea is to weld a bunch of steel cables into the structure of the ship and use winches / hydraulic cable jacks mounted on the shore to pull it, sort of like how costa concordia was moved off the rocks. The limiting factor would be how much force you can apply to the structure of the ship without pulling it apart.
yup, my first thought was also strand jacks. could get it out in the time that it takes for the concrete anchor/structure on shore could cure and dry.
TBH I think bulldozers would be better than winches in this particular case
I can’t help but think there is way more to this story than we see.
A big ship is blocking the Suez Canal.
I seen that there are hundreds of cargo ships sitting out on the ocean for weeks before this happened, I don’t know what the holdup is probably Covid, they’re going to make a big deal about this, saying it is costing billions of dollars, yeah right 😜
Probably some sort of scam going on somewhere. Oh no goods now cost 50% more cos suez canal is blocked.Or Suez canal is trying to hike shipping costs and they said fuck it...We'll just block the canal.
@@77FortranAfter the international airline carriers, it's now time to bankrupt some big shipping companies too
Epstein and his lover G is on the ship, they thought this was the way to freedom :)
Could water jets be used to force controlled erosion around the hull? Maybe utilizing the pumps on fire suppression boats?