Thats a good question. But why would you want to do that? Except if you don't want to define your variables correctly. It may not affect basic analysis that you do but will definately affect advanced analysis. Its good to clearly define your variables anytime you are working with data, to make sure the variables are properly defined so that you and anyone else who works or will work with the data can tell exactly what was measured, and how it was measured. I hope this answers your question 🙏
I think Mean is the best measure as it gives exact average value especially if the data is a normal frequency distribution but Median will be the best if the data is skewed
Well done chief; I'd like to ask, in the variable view, you put the width of the hb as 3; e.g 10.3g/dl, is the decimal point not put into consideration; hence making the width 4? Thank you for the great job , God bless.
The mean 11.185 will give the best representation of the central tendency in this case as it falls perfectly around the peak of the normal distribution curve which is the central part of the distribution.
Wow! I duff my hat👌. Highly informative concise 20 minutes. No regrets at all Sir. To your question asked in the video, the best measure of central tendency and dispersion is the mean and standard deviation. In any symmetrical distribution as shown in the graph/plot, the mean, median, and mode are equal but the mean is widely preferred and the best due to it been the measure that includes all the values in the data set for calculation in comparison to the median or mode. We hope to learn more from you going forward. Statistics is surmountable. Many thanks Sir
Thank you so much Dr Shamsudeen (Subdeen). very brilliant response sir. I have been waiting patiently for your submission. I am so grateful to have a colleague and friend like you. I remain grateful sir
Please, I will like you to put us through how to report analysed data in out dissertations I.e the univariate , bivariate and multivariate. Also how to interpret and to best tabulate our results. Thank you
Amazing! I thought it was impossible for me to understand SPSS. Thank you. As for the question , I think Mean should be used as the best measure of central tendency to represent the hemoglobin data because it uses all values in the data set to give an average
Dr. I love the way you interact with the audience even without seeing us. I believe everyone will agree with me that they felt as though they were in a physical class. I am not a lecture type, but I have followed every single one of your lecture videos since last semester. Your video editing and graphics are also top-notch. You deserve an award already, sir🎉 Kudos to you, sir
Great presentation sir, this is really helpful. The mean (11.98) is the best measure of tendency because it best describe the distribution i.e it uses all the data set to give an average.
@@SPSS4RESEARCH For the question . I think the data is skewed to the right cos the mean is greater than the other two measures of central tendency which actually coincide suggesting that the median may be the better measure but the significance is best analysed objectively testing for normality which can be done to confirm if normally distributed using the Kormogorov-Smirnoff or Shapiro-Wick. If its not significant then its normally distributed and the mean can be used but if significant, I'll go for the median as my measure of central tendency.
Interesting! This is awesome. The face you made when you talked about bar chart got me laughing.😂😂😂. See as you cut us warning😂😂😂.I was actually thinking of using bar chart o🙈, I guess I have to step up. I would choose mean because it is best used when the data is normally distributed like the one you worked with ( I stand corrected sir).
Very interesting stuff in just 20mins, I feel like a pro and I haven’t even practiced it yet but I get it get it! Thank you so much Sir🙏🏽 About ur question I’d say it’s the mean just because I know it’s the most widely preferred as the best measure of central tendency as it is the measure that includes all the values in the data set for its calculation, and any change in any of the values will affect the value of the mean. Sir, pls correct me if I’m wrong
Cynthia, You are a correct about the characteristics of mean but these are not the reasons for selecting a measure of central tendency. Mostly it has to do with the distribution of the data. If the data is normally distributed, you use the mean but if otherwise, you use the median or the mode. Now the question is, is the data normally distributed or not🤔
This is practical indeed, I thought Is going to be very difficult learning this but am at peace now, pls make more videos on this sir, thank you sir, For the question, I choose mean since it can incorporate other values, thank you
great request Kate! I just dropped a video on an introduction to Epi Info and I will be launching my new channel "Epi Info for Rookies" by the weekend God willing. please stay tuned and God bless
Very Explicit, definitely would love you to create another SPSS video like this. To the question asked i think its mean because it is distributed normally.
Thank you sir for the very educative video. The best measure of central tendency in the data above is the mean because the data is normally distributed.
This is an excellent summary of SPSS sir! It's almost as if you opened my brain to put in the information because of the level of clarity this video gives. I will choose the Mean as the most suited measure for the question. Thank you sir
Amazing!!! Sir thank you so much I used to see SPSS as a big deal but not anymore. All thanks to you For the question, I will go with the mean as a measure of central tendency.
Not exactly! It can be any of the three measures, it depends on the data. Watch this video to understand the concept th-cam.com/users/shorts8YKN1bX2QxU?si=BxPvo_-K_WEStvAJ
Thanks so much for this video! It was really easy to follow along. I'm watching this right before I leave for my job interview as a coder, hopefully it will give me an advantage :D
👍. Great response. A main factor to consider when looking for the best measure is the distribution of the data. If the data is normally distributed then (the mean, mode and median ) are similar, then the mean is the best measure. However if the data is not normally distributed then the median or mode should be considered👍
@@SPSS4RESEARCH so now is this video more of the question we’re quantitative like haemoglobin (numbers) and Age (numbers) ……..I am address a data that is a bit challenging BDI all questions are qualitative
@@gansalloadedeji3525 okay sir, what is it that you want to do? Do you want to enter the variables or you want to analyse it.? It might be nice for me to get the context of the research
SPPS made easy. What a lovely and interactive video. Kudos to you sir. With respect to your question. Since the mean, median, and mode are all close to each other, it suggests that your data may be fairly symmetrically distributed without extreme outliers. In such a scenario, any of these measures could be reasonable to use as a measure of central tendency. However, if you suspect that your data may be skewed or contain outliers, it's often safer to use the median, as it is less affected by extreme values. If your data is symmetrically distributed and does not contain outliers, the mean can also be a suitable choice. The mode can be informative, but it's less commonly used as the sole measure of central tendency, especially in continuous data.
Indeed you've made me a hero. I am grateful Sir.Meanwhile concerning your question, I am not too sure but I'd pick ' mean' as the best measure of central tendency to represent hemoglobin. This is because the mode and median are practically the same, I couldn't pick either. To the other question...yes I wouldn't mind mind more videos of SPSS to aid practice. Thanks a million.
You are welcome Christie. The choice depends on whether the data is normally distributed or not. So the first task is to determine the distribution of the data and if it is normally distributed then the mean is the best measure otherwise it’s the median. So Christie, my hero, I leave you with finding out whether the data is normally distributed or not👍
Thank you for this great tutorial. Through it, I have been able to create my variables and do basic analysis. Best measure of central tendency for the haemoglobin concentrations can either be mean if the data is unskewed and median if skewed.
The median and mode is the best measure of central tendecies because Hb is a continuous variable and not discrete. I hope I am correct. Thanks for teaching me SPSS. It has been a wonderful experience . Thank you Sir.
My Chief 🙌. You are close ☺️. Usually to know which is the best measure, you will need to find out whether the data is normally distributed or not. If it is normally distributed then the mean is the best measure. However, if it’s not normally distributed then the median or mode will be the best measure depending on the level of skewness of the data. So you see sir, you are close😃
I believe the mean is the best ti reoresent haemoglobin level because it measure the average haemoglobin level of the resondents and is easier to come up with suitable result from the analysis.
Awesome response. The mean may not always be the ideal measure for numeric variables. It could be median or even the mode. Based on the results, which is the best and why?
Great catch Patrick! Hb was put as a target variable because the aim of the research was to identify factors associated with HB levels. So HB is intended as the outcome variable when we move further to bivariate and multivariate analysis. So you are right, we didn’t use it in this introductory video. Hopefully in a subsequent video on bivariate analysis we will see it being used. I appreciate your feedback sir 🤗
Mash Allah, may Allah bless you... you are super lecturer, we use Mean as central tendency and standard deviation as dispersion when we have continues or numerical data to be analyzed to check if normally distributed or not, am I right? Thank you
Amazing lecture Sir. I have been trying to learn SPSS for ages but this is the first time that I actually understand some of the specifics. I think the mean should be the best measure of the central tendency in this study.Thank you so much.
Wow wow wow! So interesting and easy to understand. Finally gotten an easy way to get my assignment done. Thank you for the effort you put in your work. About the question you asked, I'll choose Mode as the best measure of central tendency to represent the Hb data because mode represents the highest occurring number meaning more number persons from the study group had the same Hb value. We can call that the average Hb you will find within the population where the study group were selected from.
Awesome response Adenike, it doesn’t depend on the highest occurring number like in elections where the majority carries the vote. It depends on whether the data is normally distributed or not. So the question is seeing these results, is the data normally distributed?
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.82[1/2] แก๊ง 3 สาวเพื่อนซี้บุก CAMPปลิ้นครั้งนี้ห้ามเสียอาการ](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_6WUjXHe1TM/mqdefault.jpg)
I wish I could like this video a thousand times 👌🏾
Thank you so much Namatula 😊
The video help alot thanks
@@SPSS4RESEARCH pls sir how do I download this spss
I have watched it up to 5 times
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
God bless you Sir
In the variable view
can't I just use input for all my variables, I.e under the role column
Thats a good question. But why would you want to do that? Except if you don't want to define your variables correctly. It may not affect basic analysis that you do but will definately affect advanced analysis. Its good to clearly define your variables anytime you are working with data, to make sure the variables are properly defined so that you and anyone else who works or will work with the data can tell exactly what was measured, and how it was measured. I hope this answers your question 🙏
I think Mean is the best measure as it gives exact average value especially if the data is a normal frequency distribution but Median will be the best if the data is skewed
Great submission, Rofiat👍
I never knew 20 mins could make a very big difference, sir pls could teach us how analyse Likert scale data on SPSS?
Sure, I started with What is SPSS and in 20mins I am inside it.
Well done chief; I'd like to ask, in the variable view, you put the width of the hb as 3; e.g 10.3g/dl, is the decimal point not put into consideration; hence making the width 4?
Thank you for the great job , God bless.
Great question Dr, the width has to do with the number of digits and so the decimal point is not counted. I hope this helps😊
The mean 11.185 will give the best representation of the central tendency in this case as it falls perfectly around the peak of the normal distribution curve which is the central part of the distribution.
Wow! I duff my hat👌. Highly informative concise 20 minutes. No regrets at all Sir. To your question asked in the video, the best measure of central tendency and dispersion is the mean and standard deviation. In any symmetrical distribution as shown in the graph/plot, the mean, median, and mode are equal but the mean is widely preferred and the best due to it been the measure that includes all the values in the data set for calculation in comparison to the median or mode. We hope to learn more from you going forward. Statistics is surmountable. Many thanks Sir
Thank you so much Dr Shamsudeen (Subdeen). very brilliant response sir. I have been waiting patiently for your submission. I am so grateful to have a colleague and friend like you.
I remain grateful sir
Thank you very much sir for this video, it was really insightful
Please, I will like you to put us through how to report analysed data in out dissertations I.e the univariate , bivariate and multivariate. Also how to interpret and to best tabulate our results. Thank you
Okay, Sir. I will add it to my list. It will be coming up soon God willing
Thank you boss
👍
Lastly, kindly show us how to download and clean data from kobotoolbox into SPSS. Thank you sir
Very good request. Coming up soon God willing. Thank you so much
@@SPSS4RESEARCH This would be very much appreciated sir. Thank you. Looking forward to it.
@@drabdullahiahmadu4708 nice 👌. Added to my list, coming up soon God willing
Super superb, nice one there sir. Thank you
Dr Fahad , Nagode Sosai 😄
Thank you so much sir. Will surely share widely!
Thank you sir, very educative
Thank you Rose, I am glad it was helpful
Amazing!
I thought it was impossible for me to understand SPSS.
Thank you.
As for the question , I think Mean should be used as the best measure of central tendency to represent the hemoglobin data because it uses all values in the data set to give an average
Great response Ada👍
Dr. I love the way you interact with the audience even without seeing us. I believe everyone will agree with me that they felt as though they were in a physical class. I am not a lecture type, but I have followed every single one of your lecture videos since last semester.
Your video editing and graphics are also top-notch. You deserve an award already, sir🎉
Kudos to you, sir
Thank you Simon for your feedback. It’s much appreciated 👍
Very helpful
Thank you so much for sharing this
Thank you so much Dr, I am glad it was helpful 😊
Great presentation sir, this is really helpful.
The mean (11.98) is the best measure of tendency because it best describe the distribution i.e it uses all the data set to give an average.
Thank you sir. We appreciate your tutelage
Thank you so much Chief Badru. You guys make it worth it!. I appreciate your feedback, I really do
Great video. Wonderful. God bless you for this great work
Thank you so much Dr. I really appreciate your feedback and support. God bless you too
@@SPSS4RESEARCH For the question . I think the data is skewed to the right cos the mean is greater than the other two measures of central tendency which actually coincide suggesting that the median may be the better measure but the significance is best analysed objectively testing for normality which can be done to confirm if normally distributed using the Kormogorov-Smirnoff or Shapiro-Wick. If its not significant then its normally distributed and the mean can be used but if significant, I'll go for the median as my measure of central tendency.
@@drabdullahiahmadu4708 very brilliant answer. Thank you so much Dr Abdullahi for your feedback 😊. I am grateful sir
Interesting! This is awesome. The face you made when you talked about bar chart got me laughing.😂😂😂. See as you cut us warning😂😂😂.I was actually thinking of using bar chart o🙈, I guess I have to step up. I would choose mean because it is best used when the data is normally distributed like the one you worked with ( I stand corrected sir).
Awesome 😅. You are correct! I appreciate your feedback too☺️
this video is what i really want to listen once more. pls how do i download it sir?
Nice! Please kindly checkout the video on how to download SPSS 28. Cheers and Godbless
Very interesting stuff in just 20mins, I feel like a pro and I haven’t even practiced it yet but I get it get it! Thank you so much Sir🙏🏽 About ur question I’d say it’s the mean just because I know it’s the most widely preferred as the best measure of central tendency as it is the measure that includes all the values in the data set for its calculation, and any change in any of the values will affect the value of the mean. Sir, pls correct me if I’m wrong
Cynthia, You are a correct about the characteristics of mean but these are not the reasons for selecting a measure of central tendency. Mostly it has to do with the distribution of the data. If the data is normally distributed, you use the mean but if otherwise, you use the median or the mode. Now the question is, is the data normally distributed or not🤔
10.9 is preferred because it is the median and mode.
🤔
Wow sir, thank you so much, God bless
Thank you chief KABIR, God bless you too sir😊
I will still use the mean as the measure of central tendency, the data looks normally distributed
🤔
Wao! Great 20 minutes. You are a cool teacher. And humorous too. Thanks immensely.
Thank you so much My Chairman John.👍
Interesting lecture. Thank you Sir.
You are welcome Andokari👍
This is practical indeed, I thought Is going to be very difficult learning this but am at peace now, pls make more videos on this sir, thank you sir,
For the question, I choose mean since it can incorporate other values, thank you
Great response Eunice😊
Simple n a well tailored made lecture.
@Krunchfoods llc Thank you so much 😀
Great, is quite educating
Thank you so much Dr.
I would use the mean. The measures are similar and well centered.
Good response Dr 👍. But how similar is similar?😅
Thank you for the video.
You are always amazing.
Looking forward to more videos sir
Am glad you found this useful
Thank you so much for the presentation
Thank you so much Abdulkarim, I truly appreciate your feedback
Amazing presentation!
Thank you sir
Na gode Oga Tasiu🙌
Thank you Sir!. Mean is the best measure of central tendency as it gives more meaning
Great response sir Auwal
Thank you Sir
highly needed ,thanx so much sir
Very interesting sir ,my answer will be mean as it is a normal distribution with median and mode equal.
OMG, I learnt in 20 minutes what I have been trying to understand for ages!!! Thank you so much sir!!! May God bless you always
😎
Mean and SD. It's normally distributed.
Thank u so much for this sir.
We need more videos like this from our able and capable ABU Lecturers
I agree with you Faruna😊
There are lots of very good ABU lecturers, I am just a baby lecturer compared to most of them. Thanks for your feedback
Wow! So cool! I was captivated start to finish, and it was so interesting, it did not feel like learning at all. This is so amazing sir!
Thank you so much, Ruthie! I am glad you enjoyed it!! waiting to subscribe to your TH-cam channel
Well appreciated Sir. JazakumulLahu khayr
Thanks sir . This is Nice
Good work, quite explicit
I remain loyal Chief! Thank you sir
A very interesting video Sir. Thank you very much. You're the best👍👍👍
You are most welcome Winifred 👍
Sir please can you do a video on Epi Info 7, because ive been trying dor weeks now to understand the topic but all to no avail
great request Kate! I just dropped a video on an introduction to Epi Info and I will be launching my new channel "Epi Info for Rookies" by the weekend God willing. please stay tuned and God bless
Thank you very much sir, I just watched the intro video and subscribed to the channel, I'm waiting patiently
Very Explicit, definitely would love you to create another SPSS video like this. To the question asked i think its mean because it is distributed normally.
You are awesome Safeerah. I think you are now a guru with SPSS and an expert in Biostatistics 🙌
Thank you sir for this. I think the mean is the best measure of central tendency in this example.
Excellent Reuben, but why do you think its the mean?
Amazing Doctor, Thank you for your elaboration.
You made if very easy 🤍
May Allah bless you.
Thank you sir for the very educative video. The best measure of central tendency in the data above is the mean because the data is normally distributed.
Very good
This is an excellent summary of SPSS sir! It's almost as if you opened my brain to put in the information because of the level of clarity this video gives. I will choose the Mean as the most suited measure for the question. Thank you sir
Glad it was helpful!
This video is mind blowing! I will love to learn more about SPSS sir.
I
Awesome 👏. Thank you for your feedback
Thanks for this summary.
thank you for this awesome video. The Mean best measure of central tendency
👍
The mean sir
Simply for the fact that it'll sit perfectly on the peak of the standard deviation curve
Thank you sir
Thank you sir for the brush up. Twenty minutes well utilized.
I agree with you😎
Thank you Chidinma, I very happy it was helpful😊
Amazing!!! Sir thank you so much
I used to see SPSS as a big deal but not anymore. All thanks to you
For the question, I will go with the mean as a measure of central tendency.
You are most welcome
Very practical sir. You just have a unique way of passing knowledge.
Mean is the best measure cos it takes all parameters into consideration. Will need to watch this again to fully comprehend it. Thanks doc .
Not exactly! It can be any of the three measures, it depends on the data. Watch this video to understand the concept th-cam.com/users/shorts8YKN1bX2QxU?si=BxPvo_-K_WEStvAJ
This is awesome.
Thanks a lot
You are welcome Sammie, there is more to come😎. Please kindly stay tuned!
Thanks so much for this video! It was really easy to follow along. I'm watching this right before I leave for my job interview as a coder, hopefully it will give me an advantage :D
Wishing you the best in your interview ☺️
Weldon Sir.
Keep doing the good work Sir
Thank you so much Dr.
The mean is the best measure of central tendency because it gives us an average. also, the data is not skewed as shown in the chart.
Great response Fati
Thank you very much Sir I learn an expensive knowledge on analysis within shot period of 20minute
Am glad you found it helpful 👍
I’ll choose the mean, because it includes all the variables measured.
👍. Great response. A main factor to consider when looking for the best measure is the distribution of the data. If the data is normally distributed then (the mean, mode and median ) are similar, then the mean is the best measure. However if the data is not normally distributed then the median or mode should be considered👍
That was very interesting!!!
Am glad you found this interesting Ma’am
This is the best 20 minutes i have spent learning!!! This is so good sir. Please make more videos like this. God bless you
😎
It seemed impossible to ever learn how to analyse data as an undergraduate.. thank you immensely for this sir… a well spent 20minutes
Am glad you found this impactful. Thank you so so much for your amazing feedback.
Very simple to understand. Thank you very much sir
You are welcome Chief!!
The video is awesome
Thank you DR
Thank you sir ... Will try and practice and perfect it ...
Awesome 👏
Hello
Thanks for this can you drop an Spss video of when the data is alpha numeric an dhow you go about it
Thank you Gansallo for your question. Please can you expatiate on your request a bit more?
@@SPSS4RESEARCH so now is this video more of the question we’re quantitative like haemoglobin (numbers) and Age (numbers) ……..I am address a data that is a bit challenging BDI all questions are qualitative
@@gansalloadedeji3525 okay sir, what is it that you want to do? Do you want to enter the variables or you want to analyse it.? It might be nice for me to get the context of the research
This is eye opening, thank you sir.
👍 Chief James✌️
You the best sir,keep up the good work
Thank you so much ma’am, l am glad it is helpful
SPPS made easy. What a lovely and interactive video. Kudos to you sir.
With respect to your question.
Since the mean, median, and mode are all close to each other, it suggests that your data may be fairly symmetrically distributed without extreme outliers. In such a scenario, any of these measures could be reasonable to use as a measure of central tendency.
However, if you suspect that your data may be skewed or contain outliers, it's often safer to use the median, as it is less affected by extreme values. If your data is symmetrically distributed and does not contain outliers, the mean can also be a suitable choice. The mode can be informative, but it's less commonly used as the sole measure of central tendency, especially in continuous data.
Great feedback Kayode
Great lecture in simplicity
My Chief, thank you so much Dr Gibson!!
Yes, 100%
Easy peezy Lemon squeezee😁
Amongst other things I've learnt from you sir
Thanks for the added knowledge
Alaran-Wahab M.A
Habba? 😅
How you share knowledge in such a simplified and easy manner is fascinating. You make learning interesting. Thanks for this.
Thank you so much Jay Pee. Much appreciated
You are insanely amazing Sir..
Lots of respect from India..
Thank you so much 🤗
Indeed you've made me a hero. I am grateful Sir.Meanwhile concerning your question, I am not too sure but I'd pick ' mean' as the best measure of central tendency to represent hemoglobin. This is because the mode and median are practically the same, I couldn't pick either.
To the other question...yes I wouldn't mind mind more videos of SPSS to aid practice.
Thanks a million.
You are welcome Christie. The choice depends on whether the data is normally distributed or not. So the first task is to determine the distribution of the data and if it is normally distributed then the mean is the best measure otherwise it’s the median. So Christie, my hero, I leave you with finding out whether the data is normally distributed or not👍
Thank you for this great tutorial. Through it, I have been able to create my variables and do basic analysis.
Best measure of central tendency for the haemoglobin concentrations can either be mean if the data is unskewed and median if skewed.
Great response Safiya! That is a smart way to dodge o! Okay, Is this data skewed or not?
Good
Chief Cyril, thank you sir
I love this guy🥰. I wish all our teachers can be like him!! 20 mins of good stuff👍
😎
The median and mode is the best measure of central tendecies because Hb is a continuous variable and not discrete. I hope I am correct. Thanks for teaching me SPSS. It has been a wonderful experience . Thank you Sir.
My Chief 🙌. You are close ☺️. Usually to know which is the best measure, you will need to find out whether the data is normally distributed or not. If it is normally distributed then the mean is the best measure. However, if it’s not normally distributed then the median or mode will be the best measure depending on the level of skewness of the data. So you see sir, you are close😃
I believe the mean is the best ti reoresent haemoglobin level because it measure the average haemoglobin level of the resondents and is easier to come up with suitable result from the analysis.
🤔
Indeed. Very simple. Thanks.
THANK YOU FOR THIS 20 MINS VEDIO SIR. Since Hb is a numeric data. The ideal measure of central tendency is MEAN.
Awesome response. The mean may not always be the ideal measure for numeric variables. It could be median or even the mode. Based on the results, which is the best and why?
Thank you so much Chief..That was a splendid presentation .The best measure of central tendency here is the mean.
Awesome response Opeoluwa 🙌
Nice presentation, what was the need for putting HB as a target if you were not going to use it. It should have just remained as a Scale
Great catch Patrick! Hb was put as a target variable because the aim of the research was to identify factors associated with HB levels. So HB is intended as the outcome variable when we move further to bivariate and multivariate analysis. So you are right, we didn’t use it in this introductory video. Hopefully in a subsequent video on bivariate analysis we will see it being used. I appreciate your feedback sir 🤗
Brilliant sir! I really learnt a lot. The median will be most preferred in my opinion as it isn't affected by outliers.
Solid response Chief Tony😃. I have a video on tests of normality coming very soon. Please kindly stay tuned😊
Mash Allah, may Allah bless you... you are super lecturer, we use Mean as central tendency and standard deviation as dispersion when we have continues or numerical data to be analyzed to check if normally distributed or not, am I right? Thank you
Yes, you are right
Amazing lecture Sir. I have been trying to learn SPSS for ages but this is the first time that I actually understand some of the specifics. I think the mean should be the best measure of the central tendency in this study.Thank you so much.
Great response Gesiye. You are in the right place to learn everything about SPSS. Let’s learn together 🙌
The mean is the best measure for central tendency since the data is normally distributed
Awesome 👏
Thank you Prof. That's immaculate.
Thank you.
Very simple and informative
Glad you found it useful 👍
Wow wow wow!
So interesting and easy to understand.
Finally gotten an easy way to get my assignment done.
Thank you for the effort you put in your work.
About the question you asked,
I'll choose Mode as the best measure of central tendency to represent the Hb data because mode represents the highest occurring number meaning more number persons from the study group had the same Hb value. We can call that the average Hb you will find within the population where the study group were selected from.
Awesome response Adenike, it doesn’t depend on the highest occurring number like in elections where the majority carries the vote. It depends on whether the data is normally distributed or not. So the question is seeing these results, is the data normally distributed?
Thank you, sir. It's always an interesting ride to listen to you
Victoria 🤗
This is amazing! Thank you Sir
Aishatu 👍
Very helpful sir.
Thank you
Technology is awesome when you understand it.
Yes Chief Lot, you can say that again😊