The series you made on the significant battle of Khanwa was excellent. Truly appreciate your efforts. Hope you will continue making such videos on other important battles like Panipat, Tarain etc. I am ready to help you in that.
They were not as battle hardened as Mughals.Mughals are descendants of mongols.And Rajputs don't come any way as near as the mongols or Mughals when it comes to warfare.Rajputs only fought in india.Babur fought in different parts of the world and had more experience.
No denying the fact that Babur was an exceptional warlord. But Mughals as a whole ruled for barely 200 years until they were reduced to nothing more than local zamindars after Karnal. Only a fool would compare them to Rajputs but then since you leveraged the achievements of the Great Genghis and barely a couple more Khaqans after him to glorify Mughals who were Turco-Mongols and came atleast a couple of centuries after even the real descendants of Genghis were reduced to nothing, shows where your sensibilities are! Anyway, this is what the general of Babur himself said about the Rajputs after their first encounter. "Rajputs have indomitable courage. They are the personification of Azrail. Unlike our troops, they do not abandon the field" - Mughal general Mansur Barlas after Mughals were crushed by Rajputs in Bayana.
@@jonyhyder6506 babur was partially mongol but babur's soldiers were uzbeks and afghans, also babur lost battles in Uzbekistan and won few in Afghanistan and india but he never fought in other parts of world. Later Mughals were mixed between Persian , indian rajput.
@@ChroniclesOfIndia Yeah you are a biased indian.Mughal generals praising hindu generals??LOL.Only in cringe hindi TV series its possible.Not in reality.Babur defeated A large numbers of rajputs with small number.And thats clarify which Army is superior.Muslims Almost always fought battles with small numbers.And Hindu almost always fight with large number.This is nothing new.Even in modern time 1965 India Lost against Pakisthan despite using triple numbered soldiers.They lost against east Pakistan(Bangladesh) and west Pakistan.
Why this channel have only 239 subs....I predict this channel will reach 10 million subs.
The series you made on the significant battle of Khanwa was excellent. Truly appreciate your efforts. Hope you will continue making such videos on other important battles like Panipat, Tarain etc. I am ready to help you in that.
Nice video you deserve more subscribers
Really good content!
Rajputs were indeed battle hardened but lacked military hardware of those days that is artillery
They were not as battle hardened as Mughals.Mughals are descendants of mongols.And Rajputs don't come any way as near as the mongols or Mughals when it comes to warfare.Rajputs only fought in india.Babur fought in different parts of the world and had more experience.
No denying the fact that Babur was an exceptional warlord. But Mughals as a whole ruled for barely 200 years until they were reduced to nothing more than local zamindars after Karnal.
Only a fool would compare them to Rajputs but then since you leveraged the achievements of the Great Genghis and barely a couple more Khaqans after him to glorify Mughals who were Turco-Mongols and came atleast a couple of centuries after even the real descendants of Genghis were reduced to nothing, shows where your sensibilities are!
Anyway, this is what the general of Babur himself said about the Rajputs after their first encounter.
"Rajputs have indomitable courage. They are the personification of Azrail. Unlike our troops, they do not abandon the field"
- Mughal general Mansur Barlas after Mughals were crushed by Rajputs in Bayana.
@@jonyhyder6506 babur was partially mongol but babur's soldiers were uzbeks and afghans, also babur lost battles in Uzbekistan and won few in Afghanistan and india but he never fought in other parts of world. Later Mughals were mixed between Persian , indian rajput.
@@ChroniclesOfIndia Yeah you are a biased indian.Mughal generals praising hindu generals??LOL.Only in cringe hindi TV series its possible.Not in reality.Babur defeated A large numbers of rajputs with small number.And thats clarify which Army is superior.Muslims Almost always fought battles with small numbers.And Hindu almost always fight with large number.This is nothing new.Even in modern time 1965 India Lost against Pakisthan despite using triple numbered soldiers.They lost against east Pakistan(Bangladesh) and west Pakistan.
@@ChroniclesOfIndia And Mughals ruled over india 800 years not 200.Learn history first.
The amarkavya vansh bhashkar chittor patnama rajput victory
Rana sanga not invited babur