Although I’m not interested in shooting film myself, I always learn from film-oriented videos like this: especially yours because your running dialog really unfolds your process, which I find illuminating, regardless of medium.
I love that you said that about Jurassic Park in the beginning because that's why they used Washington as the location for the on location stuff and it's my #1 reason to check it out.
Great piece - nice to see you shooting film! I just got a pack of Gold 200 last week and just waiting for the right time and place to shoot it. I'm gonna split between the M645 and Fuji GW690!
Nice video! For some epic wide RZ67 lenses, I’d recommend RZ 50mm ULD or a 65mm L-A if you want maximum sharpness and detail. The images rendered on those lenses are mind blowing. The 50mm is pretty wide though, so for something more flexible the 65mm L-A is a safe bet.
Nice! I prefer every day kind of film that handles things well even in a very bright sunny day and this film seems like something to pick up and just have some fun! Keep up the good work.
Nice video! Yeah, the lack of a prism really makes things wonky to line up! Also, handheld on a moody day is difficult because of mirror slap. You did nice work with it though
Todd, this has nothing to do with this video, but I'm just about ready to rip all of my hairs out trying to figure out and reference from a thousand YT videos with differing information on how to grade C log from the Canon EOS R, just the R. From CST to the actual BT709 lut from Canon, I don't know why my image looks so nasty. Any help or direction would be much appreciated.
shooting 200 speed film at 400 means you are underexposing by a stop, not overexposing. Nice video
Although I’m not interested in shooting film myself, I always learn from film-oriented videos like this: especially yours because your running dialog really unfolds your process, which I find illuminating, regardless of medium.
I love that you said that about Jurassic Park in the beginning because that's why they used Washington as the location for the on location stuff and it's my #1 reason to check it out.
The 50 mm f/4.5 ULD is my favorite wide-angle for the RZ67, 24mm equivalent.
Agreed, a really good lens! Most of the lenses for the RZ are fantastic.
Great piece - nice to see you shooting film! I just got a pack of Gold 200 last week and just waiting for the right time and place to shoot it. I'm gonna split between the M645 and Fuji GW690!
My favorite place on this planet !!!
If you were intending to overexpose by a stop wouldn’t you have set your meter for iso 100? Ie opening up your shadows with a longer exposure?
Thank you!
Nice video! For some epic wide RZ67 lenses, I’d recommend RZ 50mm ULD or a 65mm L-A if you want maximum sharpness and detail. The images rendered on those lenses are mind blowing. The 50mm is pretty wide though, so for something more flexible the 65mm L-A is a safe bet.
Nice!
I prefer every day kind of film that handles things well even in a very bright sunny day and this film seems like something to pick up and just have some fun!
Keep up the good work.
I shoot the RZ67 with a Sekor C 65mm F/4.5. It's an RB Lens but works great on the RZ.
Enjoyed your vid a lot too
Nice images. When I shot film it was Provia or Kodak Porta. Gold 200 always felt off to me.
17:55 Until you release that shutter. haha That "ker-chunk" sound can be heard a mile away. At least with my Bronica.
Gold 200 seems like a good cheaper alternative to Portra 400. Love your content always
Amazing 🤩🤩
Try the Mamiya Sekor Z 65mm (RZ) f/4L-A wide angle its equivalent to a 32mm full frame .
i think this is my favorite beach...
Nice video! Yeah, the lack of a prism really makes things wonky to line up! Also, handheld on a moody day is difficult because of mirror slap. You did nice work with it though
Please make video about Aspect Ratio's, and the pro's & cons of different types.
Todd, this has nothing to do with this video, but I'm just about ready to rip all of my hairs out trying to figure out and reference from a thousand YT videos with differing information on how to grade C log from the Canon EOS R, just the R. From CST to the actual BT709 lut from Canon, I don't know why my image looks so nasty. Any help or direction would be much appreciated.
If you shot at 400, I think you underexposed it.
CORRECT.
Setting film speed in camera to 100 would have been over exposing by 1 stop. 400 is under exposed by 1 stop.