Three Black men accuse SFPD of racial profiling while shopping at Union Square
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 มี.ค. 2021
- Three friends who were shopping at Saks Fifth Avenue in San Francisco accuse SFPD of racial profiling. Police say one of them matched the description of someone who brandished a firearm. They were detained for hours, say they were compliant and cleared of any wrongdoing. Police say their response was appropriate
The problem is that they don't hold accountable those people who make false allegations against others.
This is so true
The individual who made the call is the one that committed the offense! Yet, the three black men were detained by police and taunted by the caller! The police should have arrested the call, yet they let him walk. They should sue the police and the individual that they refused to arrest. The police and caller ARE on the same team!
White man got a misdemeanor citation. He will have to appear in court. The Black men were released with no charges, free to go. You might not like the exact details or the level of punishment, but your argument is baloney. The white man is being held accountable until we learn otherwise.
I agree 100 percent. Make them wait until its concluded and charge them for false reports. This is ridiculous
@@keisreeman how many times people making these bogus calls have been cited. This guy was cited for interfering not for the call.
Takes two hours to realize there wasn’t a gun 🤔
It should not have taken 2 hours to determine what was really going on Cops were just trying to find a reason to arrest these young men because they were African Americans. YEAH SUE THEM AND THE PERSON who called and made the false statement about one of them having a gun and COPS found no GUN . This is harrassment by the police held for 2 hours humiliated and embarrassed as people walk by and see them handcuffed on the floor. SUE
@@shirleyrussell7089 Can’t sue the caller but can definitely sue the police for an unlawful detainment. People that make false 911 calls need to be criminally charged in order to stop it from happening
We want to be blind we are going backwards 2hr on the ground in cuffs means dont come back
They spent 2 hours looking for something to arrest them for
@@guiltyuntilproveninnocent. Actually they CAN sue the caller. It was malicious intent. No mistakes about it.
If someone were brandishing a firearm in the store wouldn’t there have been scared customers fleeing the place and multiple 911 calls being made?
My thoughts exactly! The person who made the false accusations should be sued as well as the police department.
You would think...
Was there no metal detectors by the store door to detect fire arms when the boys entered the store? The boys should sue the store worker and the owners too for calling the police
Yes!
Exactly
If they didn't find a gun then the person who called the police should have been arrested and charged
@@bottlerocket3218 • BULLSHIT!!!!
I immediately got the feeling that someone saw them shopping, called the police on them, lied & said they have guns, hoping that the police would do something to them . And it probably was a prejudice and/or racist person . It's some mean, nasty, & evil people in this world .
Google John Crawford the 3rd from Dayton the white guy got him killed and he never faced a single charge
@@BigNorth937 ok
Yep! The caller was trying to pull a Ronald Richie and turn these young men into John Crawford III.
Edit: I left my message and noticed someone else mentioned the Crawford case too.
@@BigNorth937 wow… you learn something new every day. I know this comment is old but this is my first time seeing it so thank you for putting me on to that. I didn’t even know who John Crawford III was
@@Kwahli yeah that was the worst and he didn't even get a ticket
They'll be 100% wrong and they will say, "our officers did everything right."
That's why I hate calling them law enforcement. When illegal acts like this happen we gotta do this and that..get lawyers..ect. At this point were law enforcement 🙄
And you know that there will be racist yeehaws who agree with the decision, and make up some bogus excuse as to why it happened
Maybe they did everything right according to their guidelines. So they should amend the guidelines along with the cops.
they responded appropriately, 100%. Why is that concept so difficult to comprehend?
@@BillCollins0707 Not really they jump to conclusions.
The only way to stop this is to end qualified immunity
And to hold these 911 callers accountable
Everyone wants to end Qualified Immunity but no one wants to do the work to make city, county and State Legislatures accountable. Citizens have the power. Use it or shut up.
@@jetjazzdauntless218Qualified Immunity is a governmental inherent doctrine to protect "the government". It is a state legislation issue to dismiss it or what like in Colorado.
The problem is, it's a judge's discretion if qualified immunity should be applied.
@@mr.dj1ssir245
Are you saying that the State Legislature cannot get rid of it?
@@jetjazzdauntless218 I'm saying that it will take state legislation to get rid of it or some parts of it.
The doctrine of qualified immunity was created by the federal government and passed down to all "governments" and their agencies.
As for now, in order for it not to be applied to these cases, it's up to a judge's discretion. Usually a state court judge in criminal court, where these cases usually begin. And then the appeals are made to the federal court for civil violations.
SFPD responded to a crime? It's a miracle! Oh It's Saks.
$$$YEARGH$$$
Why not file a complaint against the guy who called the cops?
exactly
How about sue both the caller and the police? All of their asses deserve it
Because that doesn’t fit the media’s narrative even if it’s the right answer.
@@Quimbolysticall narratives need to be expunged
The guy who called is an asshole, yes! but the cops are the ones who violated the three black men's civil rights and should be held accountable.
*"WE INVESTIGATED OURSELVES AND FOUND NO EVIDENCE OF ANY WRONGDOING"*
I KNOW RIGHT
They file a report with the accountability division and it will end up no where. Police should not investigate Police.
Rite
@Larry D idiot how? explain if you have the compacity to.
Correct police should not police themselves this is why across the board there should be a civilian complaint review board to over see all the complaints...
*nowhere
@@alvallac2171 But you understood the meaning sufficiently to correct the spelling. YT posts are not intended to be centers of "mechanical" excellence when it comes to writing. The relevant message in this post is the need for competent civilian review of certain police actions.
If someone calls with false information to the police, especially in cases like this, they should be out in jail for a good length of time because they endanger not only the accused, but the public in general.
If they have three guys in cuffs and no gun to be found, doesn’t it makes sense that there IS someone with a gun elsewhere?
exactly
No, the person that made that call is not a creditable person. There was no gun in the first place. Now it looks like he made that call out of spite.
@@vernonwhite4124 I’m saying that even from the cops point of view, they should be looking elsewhere
Mean while they got these 3 hemmed up for 2 hrs, the dude with the gun killed 18 more people in 3 different counties. A complete waste of time. The caller should've been charged for inciting terror where there was none, which was potentially life threatening.
Or maybe no gun at all false report they should be arrested. And fine for that
"This is America" - Gambino
To be honest when the mob was running thing everything was good everybody made money the cops and corp. Behaved sp now the mob is gone corp. Cops elected are the worse bring back the mob
@@homelandfreedom
America and its traditions
predate your mob theory;
not a good idea.
@@homelandfreedom the mob were also racist, prejudice and very mistreated as well by police once they got you alone no mob matters and understand police will always think twice or be scared of a group of people that works together and thinks the same compared to one man or woman standing for justice.
They were detained for 2 hours cos they were trying to find a reason to arrest the guy. If they're brandishing a firearm isn't it legal to carry guns
I'm always saying this to myself. It's not illegal to have a gun, but police always show up like it is.
@@Nyufly the white man be oppressive
It’s legal to carry guns in SOME STATES with the right certifications and licenses.
@@Godstrumpet2010 u can carry in ca don’t be stupid
But 'brandishing' means that you would have a gun pulled out, and that's ILLEGAL in most public places right?
They should have brought the caller in front of the accused.
@Predice Hendricks OK, how do they prove who the caller is after they arrive with nothing but an anonymous call?
@@keisreeman calls arent anonymous all calls are recorded every device has an address and devices used Towers
@@realting4540 I agree that it identifies the calling number, but not the person. Anybody can use anybody else's phone. You have to realize the intense scrutiny the police face these days, and they don't want to be accused of false arrest. Put yourself in their place.
They will when they go to court
How would brining the caller in front of the accused be beneficial? That sounds ridiculous!
Two hours 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️ they was looking for anything to charge them with
RIGHT !!!!! And Cops found no reason to arrest any one of them. Detained 2 hours that was RIDICULOUS.
Exactly, Black men in SAKS, how dare they have money to shop there
Rite
I'm black and I say they should have been detained. I hope the SFPD don't back down from the likes of these.
When all alibi fail, cops resort to the familiar: we got a call, and you fit the description.
Yeah! That bs line. Nowing damn well that these guy's are innocent. If they were guilty they would've acted guilty. These guy's are calm and following orders. That wht guy who placed the call should be arrested with false allegations. Im sure he was waiting on the side line waiting for these blk guy's to get roughed up or shot.
What im sayin.
@@pamelamoore8042 everything you state is slanted towards not wanting the criminal to be caught. The reported perp should be apprehended if he exists. The cops were doing their job, and I'm sorry if it bumps up against your sensitivity or liberal standards. Cops can't work in that way.
@@BillCollins0707 everything she stated is not slanted towards not wanting the criminals to get caught. First of all.......... where are the criminals? Because these 3 black guys were not committing no crime. Secondly.......... police do this a lot. That line "we received an anonymous call" is straight bullshit and they do use that when they can't come up with nothing else. I personally know that because it happened to me.
@@darkeithtravis7389 How do you know there was NO call??
2 hours 🥴 of sitting on the ground when you have No weapons on your Possession
Exactly, all about power over you...not about safety or anything. Then they wonder why they are hated.
That video showed him cuffed on the floor (not ground) for less than half a minute. How did you conclude he sat there cuffed on the floor for two hours? Do you think maybe the Saks manager offered a private room or office so that other customers could resume shopping? Do you think its possible they uncuffed him shortly after the video. If was the manager at Saks I wouldn't let that public display go one any longer than necessary.
@@keisreeman woah why’d you get so triggered. You’re calling someone out on jumping to conclusions and yet you’re doing the same thing. they likely said 2 hours because the video said they were detained for 2hrs, if you paid attention
@@musfun they don't watch the video ever when it's black ppl, they automatically assume Everytime. It could be a black person doing good and in the comments they be like "lock him up forever" don't even know what the video showed lool smh
Well, but its the original cller that is the problem.
So no crime, yet they hold them hostage? Supreme Court says that is a vi o lation of human rights.s
👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼💞
@Old fisheyed Fool Man banishing a firearm, yet people are still in the store next to the man calmly shopping.
So basically hearsay is enough to cuff people?
@Old fisheyed Fool I understand quite well, and the use of handcuffs is for "officer safety" if they feel that there a hostile environment.
But they "detained" three men and only one was in cuffs?
C'mon, really?
It's not a "violation"... it's violent crime. These cops should wear orange instead of blue.
You are right the pig's should be charged with kidnapping, and false imprisonment.
Having a firearm isn't illegal to begin with and federal law states that the possession of a firearm cannot be the sole justification for an investigation.
you cannot carry a firearm without a concealed carry permit. you are dead wrong that a cop seeing you with a gun can stop you.
stop making stuff up
@@michaelmacpherson-wm6mh I understand that you need a permit. I never said you didn't
@@michaelbaker5501 a cop can stop you and ask for your permit in most states
It doesn't take 2 hours to investigate brandishing a firearms. an initial 15-minute investigation as simple as going back to the cameras inside the store. Make sure to not only sue the store make sure you sue the San Francisco Police make sure you young men do a thorough investigation to locate the person who intaily called in the false report and sue them civically in court
Right thats bull crap they arracking our vary being
@LifeMotivated Why would anyone sue the store? The store should sue the caller for interfering with and potentially damaging Saks' business.
@@keisreeman the store was definitely complicit there is no way a high-end store like that should allow police to come in and detain it's patreons for 2 hours over brandishing a firearm the store employees and managers should have immediately and aggressively rectified the situation as soon as the police made contact with his patreons
@@keisreeman you can't sale me on The store being a victim because they definitely where complicit.... I wonder if someone from inside the store where the original callers?
@@blackbelt524 Someone brandishing a firearm in public is an exigent circumstance. The store can't stop the police in an exigent circumstance. They'd be locked the fuck up. The dude on the ground outside was the caller. He's not an employee.
One of the big problems I have is it look like they left them there for over two hours, then they made them stand up with the handcuffs on and took pictures of them. Why did they go through their wallet and run their ID for warrant when they did not see a gun? This is about as disgusting and abusive as you’re going to find.
It does NOT require 2+ hours to verify whether the detained gentlemen possessed a firearm. The detention became unlawful once the potential threat was cleared. That required no more than 15 minutes at most. Law enforcement has a duty to assess the situation independently and not rely solely on an unverified report from an anonymous caller. That is not to say they should not respond-they should and do. But they are not legally empowered to use unverified evidence alone to effect a detention (that legally became an unlawful arrest, so yes, they have solid grounds for a lawsuit). This propensity to rely on “officer safety” as the sole defense for grossly inappropriate, lazy actions must stop. As a former 12 year federal prosecutor this would not have been tolerated in any case crossing my desk, none that would’ve been prosecuted, that’s for certain. First of all, did they attempt to even verify the men’s identity with any store employee or manager before drawing their firearms and handcuffing them? Bottom line, police aren’t permitted to shirk their basic investigatory duties and violate civil liberties of innocent citizens based solely on the word of racist, lunatic callers. In the military (25 years of service and counting here), it’s expected to trust but verify. It’s the same in law enforcement. Basic human rights do NOT take a back seat to officer convenience and expedience.
Not saying you are wrong, but this "two hours" is only one side of the story. If a civil suit occurs we will hear from the police and store employees and security tapes about the time frame and how long this guy was in cuffs. There's a lot of unpacking to do.
Great comment.
Living life while black walking target facts 😥truth 💯
Having face tattoos doesn't help
Having dreadlocks makes you look homeless
@@imrighturwrong7840 so homeless people deserve to be harassed and to have their civil and human rights violated. Got you.
@@imrighturwrong7840: There are multi-millionaire Black men in the NBA, NFL, and in MLB that have dreadlocks. Try again.
I understand fully. I feel that I too was racially profiled at Safeway/Albertsons for shoplifting. I was working, shopping for Instacart. Two Denver policemen jumped to conclusions after a White manager asked them to interrogate me for shoplifting that I did not do. I filed a complain with Safeway corporate, Denver Police Department, and with the state civil rights division. We as Black people must do the work, documenting, filing complaints and taking legal action against this BS. They keep doing it because we brush ' ish off too damn easily. Kevy Michaels.
The police acted according to policy when they saw a black man shopping.
🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
Yeah, with racism
People calling police,and using them as their personal revenge machines.
How about detain the individuals, check the video cameras, then if it is what it is... arrest them, if not release them. Why have them handcuffed for so long.... unless it was for fun and games and to embarrass them... which I wouldn’t doubt!!!!
There is no "THEM!" The false call alleged that there was a person brandishing a firearm! Even if it were true that would NOT be a "THEM!" That would be a single PERSON not THREE! You don't get to arrest EVERYBODY who's black even if *"A"* person is doing something!
This was clearly racial profiling! It is standard procedure to ask the color to identify the suspect and what HE is wearing! But these loser cops treated all three of them like suspects why? Because all three of them are black!
I can assure you even if one BLACK guy was with two other WHITE guys and there was a report on HIM brandishing a firearm that ONE black guy is the ONLY guy that would have been handcuffed and detained and not him AND his two white friends!
@ Michael Kivler You saw a guy handcuffed for 25 seconds and automatically assumed he was left handcuffed on the sales floor for two hours. Maybe he was, but maybe store management had police take them to a secure office ASAP where the handcuffs were removed. Management doesn't want an unpleasant scene in the middle of their sales floor for any longer than necessary. When you don't know the details, at least think about some logical possibilities instead of jumping on your keyboard talking bull.
They could've just easily planted a few guns on them and then it would've been even more fun... Good luck suing the cops!
COPS CLEARING THEIR OWN IS EXACTLY WHY YOU NEED TO ALWAYS RECORD THE POLICE.
GOOD LUCK SUING THE COPS.
When people who are being accused start recording, these are the moments when officers and/ or store employees start to realize they f'd up
I think police should spend more time to protect the elderly in Chinatown. They are getting beaten and robbed.
@Freedom and Liberty Unfortunately, that won't happen because that would require that these cowards do real police work. Racial profiling is much easier for lazy cops.
Also, they might get hurt if they actually do their jobs and try to protect people.
By the same cohort group
The justice system is a business, protecting people from real crimes is not a priority.
Cops try asking questions like you do to white folks instead of yelling, "Get the fk on the ground!!!" to black and brown people.
I think that is called "swatting". It's when someone calls the police and makes up a false disparaging accusation about an innocent person. When the police come, that innocent person is treated with brutality or maybe even killed within minutes of their arrival, which in turn satisfies the caller's desire to see a black man die behind the "weaponized" response of the police. This is wickedness at its finest.
Internet lawyer
YE$$$$$$... All in the name of I$RAEL!!! >: D
Remember even if they kill these guys the police will still say they acted ocordenly scary people scary
They wouldn't even have to kill them... All they have to do is plant a gun on them ,and that'll already be enough to put 'em behind bars for at least 20+ years!
Play the 911 call, that's where the issue will be clear.
Yeah let's head the 911 call the caller should be sued too.
AMERIKKKA at its FINEST 🤷🏿♂️🤷🏿♂️
AMELIKKKA AMELIKKKA there's no other planet I'd rather beeeee.
@Jeep Wrangler AMELIKKKA AMELIKKKA there's no other place I'd rather be
@@woke72 go back to Mexico
@@augustbruh8748 lame ass.
Dum dum
Why does it take two hours to figure out if they have guns on them? Especially since they immediately complied!!! I hope they win their lawsuit!
Too many cops don't take the time to assess the situation so they can act accordingly to it, but when your only tool is a hammer everything looks like a nail
Because they are already prejudiced against them. Mass shooters are treated more humanly.
Easier to blame others, but when out of 5 people shoplifting 4 are brothers! Kind hard to believe that they are shopping right?
Duck's feet, duck's feather, duck's beak, and all the sudden you wanna be a chicken? Come on brother, wake up!
@@lahainahawaii4068: How come White school shooters have consistently been treated better than Black people? They never seem to cause the entire White race to be stereotyped. Why is that?
@@lahainahawaii4068 That doesn’t justify treating every black person as a criminal, especially since, despite what you seem to have been brainwashed into believing, most are NOT shoplifters. You may as well say 99% of all rapists are male, so let’s treat every male as a potential rapist. That’s not how the law is supposed to work. You can’t presume guilt based on someone sharing a physical characteristic. You need evidence to back up a claim. What happened to innocent until PROVEN guilty?
The didn't bring any hammers with them into the store, but they prolly had a couple of shotguns or assault rifles in their car... Remember now, these guys were from Oakland!
It just happened to me as a Black LesbianTODAY in union square. I walked into Macy's held the door for.a woman coming out. She happend to be staff & assumed I was homeless so signaled security to follow me around the store the entire time I shopped. he even took a photo of me while I was exiting. Last time I was in Saks I was harassed just for looking at shoes.
Failed to properly assess and held for and unreasonable amount of time once it was discovered there were no weapons involved. The man making the report should be charged with obstruction, making false 911 call, disorderly conduct and reckless endangerment. The innocent young men could have been shot and killed
Two hours of sitting on the ground when you have no weapons on your possession
HUMILIATING !!!!!!!!!!!!
Like y'all really care..
I saw him cuffed on the floor for less than a minute. I don't where he was or whether he was cuffed for the next one hour 59 minutes, because there is no evidence. He didn't say that he was cuffed on the floor for two hours, yet you think you can speak on his behalf.
What is it making people sit down, like dogs when told to sit , I'm a grown law abiding man in the UK no way would they demand I do that if they did I wouldn't never fact
What is wrong with your usa , its obviously not working
Well it works for the billion dollar incarceration business so obvious
With your over the top sentences compared to probably anyother country
Making up crimes in plain sight to generate money
Wake up america , for the record when one of the owners of these massive companies, get caught theaving millions off the tax payer you guys , not a day In prison period
Land of the free has become laughable
Searched & no gun found, why were they detained for several hours b4 being released. SMH !!
This is why we need to support our own we give them our money and this is just how we get treated never seen other races get treated like this at all.
That's why black lives matter... Cuz blacks get the MOST attention compared to every other race!
They showed the white guy I'd get the hell out of town if I was him lol lol
No matter how wrong the officers are they'll always lie to protect their own. .. smmfh 😠
It took two hours to figure out they didn't have a gun..
For two hours????? It took y’all that long to figure out it wasn’t them?!!?! Yeah racial profiling!!!
Remember a officer can lie at stop.
Disgusting 🐷's What a terrible experience to go through even the store should be sued big $ coming their way.
problem is what if they had a license to carry a weapon and they had one holstered.... then what would have happened????
No weapons at all dumb ass
California... Not gonna happen.
@@newps3slimify You're missing his point.
The Store called the police. That other story the police is standing is false.
I watch this news clip with a open mine and the three young black men. Forgetting how they might look , were well spoken , calm and what they ask was reasonable.
That's because they're all actors, and this is fake news...
Why are you wasting 2 hours of these men and tax payers funds to determine if a man you have bounded has a firearm?
Why do you feel it appropriate to degrade innocent human beings?
May these officers and those whom employ them have 10 fold come back to them, as to what they put out.
Callers making false allegations should face charges
There wasn't even a caller in the first place, and nobody's ever gonna be able to prove it!
They all get mad with the cops, but none of them criticize their own people for bringing this on them. Don't lie to yourself!
Why should the actions of another Black person become their problem? Why do White people get the individuality privilege, but Black people don't? There are people willing to lie against a Black person because they know that somebody will believe them. You don't understand how hurtful that is!
@@symonelewis1690 If you ran a business and a certain color was steeling from you... no human being is above bias.
@@LambertBowden56: No human being is above bias, but there people out here that let their biases run completely wild. Everybody has biases, but it's important to keep those biases under control.
I'd like to hear the call on the discription of the so called gun holder.
No, I want to hear the call to see if the caller gave up their information because the SCOTUS has ruled that anonymous phone calls cannot be used to create RAS for detention
There ought to be a penalty for false allegations and waste of public resources plus the police department need to be penalised for ill treatment of citizens.
You would think these Killers with Badges would have learned from Rodney King.
The guys weren’t beat up
@@nathaliedaceus8654 what's your point? Harrassment due to skin color is wrong..
All phone calls of false reports need to be followed up and they need to be charges filed on them
Sue the cops and have them fired
We’ll NEVER receive the benefit of the doubt…
Whoever callled it in to the Police should also face charges of making a false report.
They could have been killed. Inexcusable and irresponsible. The person LYING should be in jail.
@Joyce Williams
Hi Joyce, tuck in your racism. It’s showing.
I will not comment on your attempt at a strawman argument. It’s irrelevant to the conversation. Stay focused.
Only two crimes were committed here. 1. The man making false reports to police. 2.The police falsely arresting and holding 3 innocent citizens in handcuffs.
We all should be outraged. Wonder WHY you’re not…
I walked into Bloomingdales just to see what the Hype was about, and people were looking at me and following me around like I was thief.
It was actually the first time I've ever walked into that store in my entire life.
I really hate when they do that.
I had to pull out over $200 cash just to show a worker at Whole foods that I could affordable the $10 worth of fruit I was purchasing. She kept paving behind me, looking over my shoulder just to ensure that I paid for everything.
It's sad how after I pulled my money out, she stayed back with her mouth agape.
I really hate this shit.
It's so degrading and annoying.
I am becoming increasingly angry by their judgements. I really am. And they can act like they are above angry outburst if they want. I might be liable to lay hands on someone for disrespecting me in this way. It's becoming so tiresome.
That’s all it boils down to. Members of white racist America treat the cops like their own personal security guards. They use 911 for their own beck and call anytime they think a black person is “somewhere he doesn’t belong “ . Or in a place they deem as “theirs “. It’s systematic racism.
I wouldnt give them my hard earned $
@@NAT-turners-Revenge I understand but even black businesses act high abd mighty.
I would rather give my money to a businessman who treats me with kindness and appreciates my support of his business
@@nicoleraheem1195 That's exactly my point-- I didnt differentiate between black or non black owned. You go where you're treated as a equal
@@NAT-turners-Revenge Ik 😭I did though. I was just thinking about how rare good service is and that even black owned companies are shitty
I'm originally from San Francisco, an I was absolutely embarrassed by SFPD. These type of ignorant cops gotta quit acting like paperweights an d serve & protect, not humiliate an intimidate! ✊🏾😡
It's called CORRUPTION, bro... Greetings from New York!
If anyone was waving a weapon in the store it would have been on video.
Exactly and the store would have called the police themselves
@@IsabellaVSpik Yes, it might be on video, but they won't see it immediately. It's not a casino. Retail operates those cameras as more after the fact verification. The floor people are usually the first to notice.
Let's how the civil suit goes. Its been two months and there's no mention of it so far.
how are u free in the USA?
What?
That's the great trick. It's a total lie, but wildly successful marketing.
Smoke and mirrors
chinatown is NOT safe too!!!! who are they going to sued
Sue dwitler Donald dump drumpf as killer key for killer kabal Putin-jinping-etc's preplanned ploys combined with preplanned pandemic virus biological genocide against humanity.
Sue the person who commits the crime against the person who was hurt People in Chinatown are not being racially profiled and KILLED by the POLICE who are sworn to protect and serve.
If he fit the description, why were all of them detained?
COPS think all young African American men are CRIMINALS.
STOP IT!!!! SHOW US THE PHONE SCRIPT [call]....file lawsuit!!! PTSD
Take this to the Supreme Court
Imagine they laugh in your face
The 3 guys should file a civil complaint against the guy who made the call and sue him for everything he's worth. He got away with doing this with a slap on the wrist. The penalty should be stiffer.
The cops could determine there was no gun in the first 5 minutes & the guys were not Guilty of any crimes yet the cops held these guys for over 2 hours. Held for 1 hr & 40 minutes longer than the 20 minutes allowed to legally detain someone
I’m guessing there’s another side to this story.
When they didn't have a gun, was that a clue? A half hour to clear them. Where was the complainant? This is the use of they match the description defense. I'd love to hear the description They are often so broad they could fit almost anyone and we know how reliable eye witnesses are.
@Ric Ladouceur Complainant was the white man cuffed on the floor. Try watching the entire video, it's obvious.
@@keisreeman what's your point. The police were weaponized by a call. You can't just react because you got a call. Three black men is not enough. You need to assess the situation when you arrive and you can't base you decisions on biases. The call was about a man with a gun. They should have cleared them immediately when no gun was found.
People should stop calling this "police misconduct" or "excessive force" and start calling it what it is: Violent Crime.
Any other term only serves to hide the truth and diminish the guilt of these criminals. Once people call this out for what it is, there won't be any hiding behind regulations. And only then change will start to happen.
Of course he matched the description - the caller was looking right at him while making his accusation.
Oh they are so full of crap, they don't shop at sacks, they were there to Jack the place . Case dismissed ..
Plot twist , they’re the ones whose doing all that smash and grab , from Oakland? Yeaaaaaa lol
Dats own my mamah bruh forill doh
I'm an average sized, slim Mexican, it happened to me at my own home when I used to live in a neighborhood with a 95% white population. Black neighbor called the police because her Black, tall, fat ex was banging on her door with a gun. The neighbor apologized to me and told me what she told 911. It did not match anything that the police said. I moved out of the neighborhood. Took me years to get over the paranoia of police pointing their guns at me and threatening to shoot. First week I moved to a diverse neighborhood, I accidently bumped into an officer walking around a wall corner, I didn't see him, he was with his gun out, he was looking for a Mexican suspect with a weapon. He apologized and continued doing his job.
"police refused to speak to us on camera.."
Of course not, cowards will be cowards.
They refuse to speak because "anything you say can and will be used against you".
Exactly what they say to their victims. Of course in this case the pigs silence further proves their guilt
2:10 is WP...now had that commotion came out of one or three of those 🤴🏿s..it would have been GEORGE FLOYD all over again.
And these officers still have there jobs all involved need to lose their jobs and the person that made to complaint needs a civil suit against him times x3
So now it's illegal to shop while being black
File law suit on the person that made call, officers are just acting according to call they received.
Right!
I matched a description once. They searched me saying there was a robbery in the area. It was believable bcuz I don't look particularly "hood" or ghetto. Just red shirt n bookbag hispanic. So they thought it was me lesson don't wear red graphic art t-shirt. Searched n done. No harm no foul. But these boys got done dirty I mean cuffed?
I was cuffed in front of thousands of people driving by but then let go when the cops figured out I wasn't their guy. It was humiliating and I wasn't given much of an apology but it wasn't the end of the world, either. Btw, I'm Caucasian and so were the cops.
@@michaelmelling9333 I love how white people say my civil and constitutional rights were violated but no big deal lol so stop crying black people
@@thewakebakeshow4160 Are you one of those folks that spends his whole life eating, breathing and sleeping everything about race? If so, you might want to go for some walks and just take in nature a bit, as it can do a person some good to clear the mind out.🌞
@@michaelmelling9333 if u truly wanna know about America ask an old black person I'm American as apple pie trust me it was America that taught me everything is about race when I just wanted to be a regular person I know my experience and I know what the truth is
@@michaelmelling9333 I'm very well educated on this subject one might even say an expert and see one thing I'm not going to do is let my advisory or the person who's oppressing me how to feel yall been doing that for 400 years not going to work here take that shit to CNN or fox or wherever but not here your I know the truth so your opinion means nothing here
More excuses to Sue... just move on... blame the caller. They fit the profile who ever called on them.
any store video?
I think if a caller is confident enough in their sight to know they saw a pistol and call the police they should be confident enough to not hide behind anonymity. Furthermore what happen to the right to face our accuser ? Or the right that if being lawfully detained whatever investigation while detailed should be within a reasonable time two hours handcuffed on the floor for the first five minutes to figure out no one had a weapon ? And you know we can point all this out but it doesn’t matter because at the end of the day the people in charge like it this way
Loll but trained police can’t tell a difference from a gun and a taser when it’s them using it.
Tattoos on the face might scare some normal people!!!
They would only scare a racist white person. The tattoos worn by the trashy bikers all over their bodies and face would not have caused any reaction from the trash. Much less, made the trash think he saw someone brandishing a gun.
@@MrOu83 what does a biker have to do with this?
If a wm said you did something. The police is going to believe them.
Disgusting how people are, even after finding out they had no weapons still had to wait 2hrs is bizarre.
I would racially profile them even in the Mars!!
They look like fine gentls
How they look, fine or otherwise, is immaterial. The fact of the matter is that a fake call to police about a man brandishing a gun was made. The trash who called them needs to be severely punished through the legal system.
If they were white would you make that comment.
What do fine gents look like? The most notorious crooks which include politicians look like fine gents!
When young black men wear saggy pants, tats & dreds they think automatically your a thief are criminal. Stay Aware at all times.
So they searched them and realized none of them had a gun ,why were they still in handcuffs for over 2 hours
Im a Black man and i wouldve called the cops on them too , i dont want to put his mom on tv saying he was a good boy.
@Alfie Green elaborate on your question ?
King Jesus. First off I don’t even believe you’re black. I have never heard a black men start of a statement by saying I’m a black man lol. We all can see the cave dweller in you showing a bit but nice try though
Wypepol weird
@@cashaddict55 Ok , why cant i be black ?
@@Officialbarz grow up man .