They started this reset off with 'Lockstep' and 'Severe Draconian measures' . Now that sets a precedent for how this will be implemented. Freedom is going to be very much off the menu for the majority of people. Who exactly is going to speaking up for the vast majority of people when this gets into full swing? Union reps? Elected representatives?. Seems to me like the vision is .....democratic representation will have one seat at the table, negotiating with Business owners. Hedge fund owners , CEOs etc all of whom practically 'OWN' their employees and will have the ability to coerce their employees to see things their way.
Who decides these rules? The collective? Who are the collective? Power corrupts and corrupts absolutely.... These people who preach these sorts of values/changes are a part of an agenda that want full control of the lives of the messes for their own personal endeavors.
If you do patent waivers then there will be fear that your patent could be wavered in the name of “progress” No one wants to create a patent for something that can be stolen from them. One of the key economic pillars is confidence and with patent waivers I would have no confidence.
I'm all for enlightened capitalism through smarter/better regulation... 'stakeholder capitalism' is basically repackaged collectivism ☭ with pretty, feel-good terms. Doomed to fail in a most tragic way, due to how many institutions have fallen for this misguided theory.
The people backing this concept are the billionaires that have been manipulating us and ruining our planet. Do we really think they want to change the systems that will harm their profits ? I think not. It's another sham like "trickle down economics".
Tons glossed over in this vid but I'll pick one. Why not ad a stipulation like that to the google algo creator? 1. That's an investment not a grant. 2. The algo could change slightly and the funds denied. 3. This would lead to massive litigation, possibly costing tax payers tons of money for losses. 4. Startups could leave to other countries with actual grants. 5. Startups will search for better investors with more favorable clauses.
I’m not trying to be a dick here, but who is it that would implement this plan - shareholder in companies would have to acknowledge the value is generated communally and be willing to dig into their pockets to distribute it, or they’d require outside imposition. Since the allegation is that the current capitalist elite are too selfish, won’t we need outside imposition? If we need outside imposition (she mentions government in her moon analogy), what stops that government/outside force from becoming a tyrant?
Good point. Only solution is digging into pockets and like you said it's definently not large shareholders in companies like Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street. That only leaves one solution. Money printer go brrrrrrr
If this way of redistributing money means "we will own nothing and be happy", then the appropriate distributions in this style of capitalism must be adhered to. Swab wants to see us voluntarily join him rather than face our emergencies! Which ARE worldwide. "Redistribution" . . . . maybe, eventually, when they own it all . . . . legally or not! With all the hacking going on, who, in their right mind, would trust digital ID?
Stakeholder capitalism: pay out only the minimum to the masses and mobs. Stakeholder capitalism: We will keep as much from the people as possible, we only need enough of them kept alive to keep the systems running. We now have the means to hide all knowledge and information from the mob and will use technology to enslave everyone because is has to be a totalitarian system. Stakeholder Capitalism is a return to feudalism with no interference from a church or religion to challenge the owner class. There is no need for family housing, dormitories will do. No need for health care, euthanasia is more efficient, no need for universal literacy and education, everyone will have their device to direct their day. They only need servants and the servants must be kept ignorant and will be.
Every time I try and clue myself up on economic ideals its as if my brain just switches off due to bordom. These systems are doomed to fail I feel (this is my gut speak), they are very uninspiring, dull, boring, all is projected lies and illusions from delusions, people in positions of power wearing the mask of happiness and success (but really they are a tragic case), where do our souls come in to this, wheres the fun, wheres the love, we are alive not zombie bots, lets gets real we're all getting old and will die soon so lets create something beautiful instead of beating around the bush with the grey paint and brush and lets get some real colour and magic into our lives.
My favorite rebranding of all this was "propaganda" into "public relations", eddy was actually clever for that time period. 1 min. into this socialist rebranding and I already stopped caring about the idea. fucking lazy lol Buy BTC to get rid of these people, decentralize the power and influence
Not much was really said. Step1 really said nothing. Step 2 used patent sharing which is a sacrifice from a business perspective to "think differently". Step 3 explains that a larger collaborative effort amongst the appropriately positioned institutions and corporations work together to solve the biggest of issue but doesn't mention where the money comes from so this is a pipe dream and if it could be done profitably in the past, it would have. No one works for free because they can't. We all need to eat. Step 4 - Redistribute Wealth Differently states wealth is created collectively (already happening) but adds additional agreements to grants for the 1 out of 100 companies that make it rich will share back their profits which the government or other venture capitalist would infuse back into innovation and wealth creation. A great idea and one that should be have been forced upon the existing billionaires in the world however they may lose their steam as a result and just no longer innovate since their motivation would be lost as their power is drained while as their coffers are drained. This all sounds like what uninformed and history ignorant yuppies would describe communism. It would be the utopia that others had failed to provide. Well there's been more than 3 major attempts to implement communism in recent history and the major 3 attempts resulting in the most atrocious horrific deaths and abuse to humanity in the last hundreds of years, if not thousands of years of human history. In order for any communist or the new fluffy term, Stakeholder Capitalism" to be implemented, you first need to crush your people by violating their rights, their financial security and their property to restructure and implement your elitist vision to ensure your dominance over the masses who will be forced to eat from your hand like live stock. If I'm not mistaken, millions if not billions will go to war to ensure they are not slaves to the sociopathic ~1300 few meat bags with money who want to control the world because they think they know best after hoarding wealth from so many people over the years. The WEF's approach is completely unnecessary and can easily be done but in a slower more collaborative method over generations in a manner that would demonstrate how wonderful this could be but only if it were implemented extremely slowly and cautiously to avoid turning everyone into an enemy.
You mention the Astrazeneca covid injection costing the customer less. Is it relevant that this drug has quietly been withdrawn from use due to safety concerns and that there are now 14000 people in the UK alone fighting for compensation from the government because they granted the manufacturer indemnity from prosecution?
North Korea practiced a command economy, not a capitalist market economy, which is what this lady is talking about. In essence stakeholder capitalism is a privatized market economy with a strong emphasis on redistribution of wealth in the areas of the society helped the business succeed….. the stakeholders.
@@billbillerton6122 communism? You’re drunk. It’s very clear you don’t understand economic systems. Like I just said, communism is a command economy, a Centrally planned economy. Those types of economies have never worked in practice. Stakeholder capitalism is a market economy. Stop being a moron.
@@salsa564 I’m not simple minded and words/ideas don’t scare me. She is clearly trying to rebrand socialism as capitalism in order to covertly force socialism onto people. I would suggest that you are the one who is scared. Scared that people are wise to the ideology that you obviously subscribe to!
When Phillip Morris promotes anti-smoking initiatives, does anybody take the company's stance at face value? Of course not! Stakeholder capitalism is essentially the same thing, but at a much larger and more muddled scale. There is so much wrong and scary with stakeholder capitalism. However, the overarching flaw of stakeholder capitalism is that it's an unpredictable and unreliable force for social and ecological betterment because it depends on the decisions and whims of company owners and management to decide what areas to focus and where and when to "do good", which again, is unpredictable and unreliable and may lead to unintended accumulations of power.
I'm curious what the use-cases of the moon landing or cleaning plastic out of the oceans has to do with capitalism. I support space exploration and living in a clean environment, but these aren't examples of capitalism as there is no immediate or tangible profit to be made from executing either projects.
With the income getting divided more, research and development budget will be massively reduced. Then the company will have a hard time with the other competition's bigger budget. Another thing is, our current state as humans, majority of us tend to do things for our own benefit. Most will not care for the company. Only a certain few will carry everyone but still they will be getting less. Unless they still have the will while being compensated just equally with the nonparticipating members, the company will collapse. Stakeholder Capitalism will only be possible if 1) Humans become suddenly selfless 2) AI will become so advanced that sharing the fruit of AI's labor will become the norm, then transforming human view in the process.
@@James_36 when is she saying the individuals cannot own parts of businesses? All she’s saying is that the public has a stake in the choices that private businesses make. It doesn’t mean that a market economy doesn’t exist. Market economies can take different forms. Look at China. But your logic, China would not be a market economy because there’s a lot of central planning, which would be wrong.
This is excellent. The recognition that wealth is created not in a vacuum, but in a society, is the lynchpin to resolving just about every problem we are facing globally right now. And I don't believe that is an oversimplification.
Who gets to decide what the priorities are for every company? On and what happens to the companies that don’t want to play along? If we create a centralized authority for this it will become corrupt
If there’s a Patent Pool only the “dummy’s” will make a patent. The smart guys with all the manufacturing around them already will just take it for themselves. So in the end no one will end up making new things
Principally I think it lies in changing what a business means an can do for society...that's single purpose real estate or space that might be able to function in multiple different ways. And in turn induce demand for a business while providing an essential function for a community. In turn you can justify higher pay for employees cause you've increased demand.
One of the main reasons Soviet communism failed was because the centralized decision makers could not make decisions on what was needed and where it was most needed fast enough. The internet and communication technologies, along with artificial intelligence computing could solve that problem. In other words, we know have the necessary technology to make a successful and functional command economy.
No that is not how It works this like your nerves system . You are fast enough to move anywhere you like immediately but you will still be overloaded when facing reality and some one with fast reflexes will show you afterlife
People will be made to integrate with technology weather they want to or not. An all pervasive techno community where people are commanded by algorithms.
The problem is the people who've created the problems, are the ones saying they're fixing it
Being a leftist or liberal is being alt-right and being an alt-right fascist is being a far leftist, chew on that little number for a while.
@@astrahcat1212 the colour black is white and the colour white is black, chew on that little number for a while.
@@pola_behr Exactly
@@astrahcat1212 💯
Worse, they're saying "give us govt control and we will fix it".
Klaus said stakeholders are the people who fly into Davos in his most recent interview. That's 3000 powerful people.
Jives entirely with the elitist shape of the system they want to implement
They started this reset off with 'Lockstep' and 'Severe Draconian measures' . Now that sets a precedent for how this will be implemented. Freedom is going to be very much off the menu for the majority of people.
Who exactly is going to speaking up for the vast majority of people when this gets into full swing? Union reps? Elected representatives?. Seems to me like the vision is .....democratic representation will have one seat at the table, negotiating with Business owners. Hedge fund owners , CEOs etc all of whom practically 'OWN' their employees and will have the ability to coerce their employees to see things their way.
@end of Line ther has been no explanation to suggest otherwise inc this video of meaningless generalizations
Yes, let's try this again only on a global scale. What could possibly go wrong?
Who decides these rules? The collective? Who are the collective? Power corrupts and corrupts absolutely.... These people who preach these sorts of values/changes are a part of an agenda that want full control of the lives of the messes for their own personal endeavors.
Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Ftfy
Everything about the WEF Agendas is a sham for global domination.
If you do patent waivers then there will be fear that your patent could be wavered in the name of “progress” No one wants to create a patent for something that can be stolen from them. One of the key economic pillars is confidence and with patent waivers I would have no confidence.
Awesome! This is exactly what we need. I'm surprised that people (companies) hadn't come up with these ideas before!
I'm all for enlightened capitalism through smarter/better regulation... 'stakeholder capitalism' is basically repackaged collectivism ☭ with pretty, feel-good terms. Doomed to fail in a most tragic way, due to how many institutions have fallen for this misguided theory.
The people backing this concept are the billionaires that have been manipulating us and ruining our planet.
Do we really think they want to change the systems that will harm their profits ? I think not.
It's another sham like "trickle down economics".
100% correct.
So small independent business owners/freelancers lose their freedoms and livelihoods. Got it.
Tons glossed over in this vid but I'll pick one.
Why not ad a stipulation like that to the google algo creator?
1. That's an investment not a grant.
2. The algo could change slightly and the funds denied.
3. This would lead to massive litigation, possibly costing tax payers tons of money for losses.
4. Startups could leave to other countries with actual grants.
5. Startups will search for better investors with more favorable clauses.
There is another name for what you are proposing comrade.
I’m not trying to be a dick here, but who is it that would implement this plan - shareholder in companies would have to acknowledge the value is generated communally and be willing to dig into their pockets to distribute it, or they’d require outside imposition.
Since the allegation is that the current capitalist elite are too selfish, won’t we need outside imposition? If we need outside imposition (she mentions government in her moon analogy), what stops that government/outside force from becoming a tyrant?
Your right Nothing, it’s cooperate like communism.
Good point. Only solution is digging into pockets and like you said it's definently not large shareholders in companies like Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street. That only leaves one solution. Money printer go brrrrrrr
If this way of redistributing money means "we will own nothing and be happy", then the appropriate distributions in this style of capitalism must be adhered to.
Swab wants to see us voluntarily join him rather than face our emergencies!
Which ARE worldwide.
"Redistribution" . . . . maybe, eventually, when they own it all . . . . legally or not!
With all the hacking going on, who, in their right mind, would trust digital ID?
"Warning! Your bank account has been frozen. Please reformulate your comment."
@@uchihasurvival And attend a re-education program.
Harvard is in all this shit as well OMG
Stakeholder capitalism: pay out only the minimum to the masses and mobs.
Stakeholder capitalism: We will keep as much from the people as possible, we only need enough of them kept alive to keep the systems running.
We now have the means to hide all knowledge and information from the mob and will use technology to enslave everyone because is has to be a totalitarian system.
Stakeholder Capitalism is a return to feudalism with no interference from a church or religion to challenge the owner class.
There is no need for family housing, dormitories will do. No need for health care, euthanasia is more efficient, no need for universal literacy and education, everyone will have their device to direct their day.
They only need servants and the servants must be kept ignorant and will be.
Brilliant!!!
Very well said!!!
Every time I try and clue myself up on economic ideals its as if my brain just switches off due to bordom. These systems are doomed to fail I feel (this is my gut speak), they are very uninspiring, dull, boring, all is projected lies and illusions from delusions, people in positions of power wearing the mask of happiness and success (but really they are a tragic case), where do our souls come in to this, wheres the fun, wheres the love, we are alive not zombie bots, lets gets real we're all getting old and will die soon so lets create something beautiful instead of beating around the bush with the grey paint and brush and lets get some real colour and magic into our lives.
i suggest reading the conquest of bread by peter kropotkin
Well said!
My favorite rebranding of all this was "propaganda" into "public relations", eddy was actually clever for that time period. 1 min. into this socialist rebranding and I already stopped caring about the idea. fucking lazy lol
Buy BTC to get rid of these people, decentralize the power and influence
I want shareholder capitalism not stakeholder.
Stakeholder Capitalism is still shareholder capitalism, but also facilitating political power to people who aren't rich.
So...economic fascism.
Italy did it best in the 40s. Worked too!
Not much was really said. Step1 really said nothing. Step 2 used patent sharing which is a sacrifice from a business perspective to "think differently". Step 3 explains that a larger collaborative effort amongst the appropriately positioned institutions and corporations work together to solve the biggest of issue but doesn't mention where the money comes from so this is a pipe dream and if it could be done profitably in the past, it would have. No one works for free because they can't. We all need to eat. Step 4 - Redistribute Wealth Differently states wealth is created collectively (already happening) but adds additional agreements to grants for the 1 out of 100 companies that make it rich will share back their profits which the government or other venture capitalist would infuse back into innovation and wealth creation. A great idea and one that should be have been forced upon the existing billionaires in the world however they may lose their steam as a result and just no longer innovate since their motivation would be lost as their power is drained while as their coffers are drained. This all sounds like what uninformed and history ignorant yuppies would describe communism. It would be the utopia that others had failed to provide. Well there's been more than 3 major attempts to implement communism in recent history and the major 3 attempts resulting in the most atrocious horrific deaths and abuse to humanity in the last hundreds of years, if not thousands of years of human history. In order for any communist or the new fluffy term, Stakeholder Capitalism" to be implemented, you first need to crush your people by violating their rights, their financial security and their property to restructure and implement your elitist vision to ensure your dominance over the masses who will be forced to eat from your hand like live stock. If I'm not mistaken, millions if not billions will go to war to ensure they are not slaves to the sociopathic ~1300 few meat bags with money who want to control the world because they think they know best after hoarding wealth from so many people over the years. The WEF's approach is completely unnecessary and can easily be done but in a slower more collaborative method over generations in a manner that would demonstrate how wonderful this could be but only if it were implemented extremely slowly and cautiously to avoid turning everyone into an enemy.
Very informative! Thank you.
Sounds like a fancy word for economic fascism to me
All of these crisis are engineered and put in place
Is this what they call tax?
We simply need to tax corporations and billionaires more.
Elon musk pays 54% of his income to taxes....are you saying it should be moee
@@babymoon5282 That's plenty. We just need to address those who use clever mechanisms to avoid paying what they should.
@@babymoon5282 yes
@@babymoon5282 how you managed to boil down "corporations and billionaires" to just "elon musk" is beyond me
You mention the Astrazeneca covid injection costing the customer less. Is it relevant that this drug has quietly been withdrawn from use due to safety concerns and that there are now 14000 people in the UK alone fighting for compensation from the government because they granted the manufacturer indemnity from prosecution?
This a model practiced in North-Korea. Who decides where whay can distribute things. This is so flawed......
North Korea practiced a command economy, not a capitalist market economy, which is what this lady is talking about. In essence stakeholder capitalism is a privatized market economy with a strong emphasis on redistribution of wealth in the areas of the society helped the business succeed….. the stakeholders.
@@salsa564 Redistribution of wealth? Wtf We don't do communism here.
@@billbillerton6122 communism? You’re drunk. It’s very clear you don’t understand economic systems. Like I just said, communism is a command economy, a Centrally planned economy. Those types of economies have never worked in practice. Stakeholder capitalism is a market economy. Stop being a moron.
So Yugoslavian socialism?
How could this possibly blow up in our faces? Lol
Collectivism and redistribution of wealth....sounds familiar 🤔
So not rebranding capitalism....rebranding socialism!
You’re extremely simple minded.Just because the host uses words that scare you doesn’t mean it’s not capitalism anymore.
@@salsa564 I’m not simple minded and words/ideas don’t scare me. She is clearly trying to rebrand socialism as capitalism in order to covertly force socialism onto people. I would suggest that you are the one who is scared. Scared that people are wise to the ideology that you obviously subscribe to!
Damn I wish
@@socialswine3656 you wish that you were able to re-brand socialism?
@@hisalexness8478 I wish they were doing socialism
When Phillip Morris promotes anti-smoking initiatives, does anybody take the company's stance at face value? Of course not! Stakeholder capitalism is essentially the same thing, but at a much larger and more muddled scale. There is so much wrong and scary with stakeholder capitalism. However, the overarching flaw of stakeholder capitalism is that it's an unpredictable and unreliable force for social and ecological betterment because it depends on the decisions and whims of company owners and management to decide what areas to focus and where and when to "do good", which again, is unpredictable and unreliable and may lead to unintended accumulations of power.
*Money Talks Bullshit Walks*
I'm curious what the use-cases of the moon landing or cleaning plastic out of the oceans has to do with capitalism. I support space exploration and living in a clean environment, but these aren't examples of capitalism as there is no immediate or tangible profit to be made from executing either projects.
they will build the instruments for their own destruction
How many of these people do you think know this is communism rebranded, and how many think this is a new idea?
Stakeholder capitalism strips everyone of there individual rights , say no to stakeholder capitalism. Only the big fish will be on top
Too late....they started corona as the catylist to the stakeholder capitalist takeover
You're exactly right.
And how would it be different from now?
All these Davos types say nothing while using a bunch of words
With the income getting divided more, research and development budget will be massively reduced. Then the company will have a hard time with the other competition's bigger budget. Another thing is, our current state as humans, majority of us tend to do things for our own benefit. Most will not care for the company. Only a certain few will carry everyone but still they will be getting less. Unless they still have the will while being compensated just equally with the nonparticipating members, the company will collapse. Stakeholder Capitalism will only be possible if 1) Humans become suddenly selfless 2) AI will become so advanced that sharing the fruit of AI's labor will become the norm, then transforming human view in the process.
Great work
This is throw the ball and hide your hand, they will never do what they say!
Jargon management
This is hell. Talking about the jab and REMDESOVIR as a good thing is scary.
so communism then? who you fooling here?
basically.
Communism is a centrally planned planned economy. Stakeholder capitalism is a Market economy.
@@salsa564 a market economy would mean individuals being able to own parts of businesses... this is not what she is saying
@@James_36 when is she saying the individuals cannot own parts of businesses? All she’s saying is that the public has a stake in the choices that private businesses make. It doesn’t mean that a market economy doesn’t exist. Market economies can take different forms. Look at China. But your logic, China would not be a market economy because there’s a lot of central planning, which would be wrong.
@@salsa564 trust me, when she says stakeholders, she does not means the likes of me and you
Great videos and information
So it's basically a cartel.
In other words COMMUNISM sold with a smile and a "happy Alice wonder world idea" COMUNISM
This is excellent. The recognition that wealth is created not in a vacuum, but in a society, is the lynchpin to resolving just about every problem we are facing globally right now. And I don't believe that is an oversimplification.
Who gets to decide what the priorities are for every company? On and what happens to the companies that don’t want to play along? If we create a centralized authority for this it will become corrupt
Sounds like socialism to me
If there’s a Patent Pool only the “dummy’s” will make a patent. The smart guys with all the manufacturing around them already will just take it for themselves. So in the end no one will end up making new things
She looks like Catarina Devon from One Piece
RE-NAMING COMMUNSIM LOL.
Sounds like communism on steroids. I’ll pass on stakeholder capitalism.
Noted.
Glad to see the comments dragging you and these terrible ideas.
What when we don't agree on the problem nor the solution. Say global warming.
Principally I think it lies in changing what a business means an can do for society...that's single purpose real estate or space that might be able to function in multiple different ways. And in turn induce demand for a business while providing an essential function for a community. In turn you can justify higher pay for employees cause you've increased demand.
But what if I own that real estate and don't want it to function that way?
It's a new form of Communism. Nothing more.
Oh noe, muh profits!
This shit will end in hunger
You're right.
There's no hunger today but this is what will bring it to existence.
You sound like the world just perfect today and if we change anything everything will go to shit 😂
Why is this bs-teller on an Harvard channel?
harvard is globalist bs
One of the main reasons Soviet communism failed was because the centralized decision makers could not make decisions on what was needed and where it was most needed fast enough. The internet and communication technologies, along with artificial intelligence computing could solve that problem.
In other words, we know have the necessary technology to make a successful and functional command economy.
No that is not how It works this like your nerves system . You are fast enough to move anywhere you like immediately but you will still be overloaded when facing reality and some one with fast reflexes will show you afterlife
People will be made to integrate with technology weather they want to or not.
An all pervasive techno community where people are commanded by algorithms.
@@Insecthouse I'll resist.
@@Insecthouse opt out of the system
This is propaganda talk.. I expected better.
*more profit.*
all she hjas done is pay lip service she has explained nothing
Ah, this is just propaganda.
Sounds like communist gobbledygook..
That's exactly what it is.
She has an only fans guys believe me she does I payed for her explicit stuff 🥵
such a bullshit...
Eww collectivism kills
End Trickle Down Economics now!!!