I've always liked the attacking principles of the Danish Gambit, and for that reason would strong recommend it to beginners trying to kick on to the next level, as it opens up opportunities to perfect skills like discovered skewers, forks, positional or calculated sacrifices and finding good squares for pieces (with the exception of the queen, where most Danish lines go against the usual principle of V-shaped movement to either kingside or queenside). I just don't think it has enough going for it at higher levels as black will usually know at what stage of the gambit that they wish to take their material advantage and start to concentrate on their own game (or indeed to decline it altogether). The end result in such cases is white losing a tempo to achieve something that black was relaxed about letting them achieve. As black on the other hand I'm very open to off the wall openings at intermediate level, though the ones I like tend to be against 1. d4 rather than 1. e4. The old benoni (1...c5) for instance takes white way out of book very quickly. Would love it if that could be covered at some point as it wasn't on the list of top ten responses to 1. d4. And congratulations in advance for what looks like 100,000 subscribers today!
Wow. Lots of improvements in the presentation, Dennis. First, more confidence, more smiling, more audience engagement, happier; second, good voice/tone throughout the video; and even threw in some joke about Johnathan in the opening.
You share the gambit that you actually play; Wonderful! How about you share 2 of your memorable games (of the opening/defense, about 5 min/game), one win and one loss; and explain the nice tactics and lessons which the audience can learn too.
on minute 23.00 you also can try the queen trap and take on F7 with the bishop check. If the king takes the bishop you take his queen :D sometimes it works
At 14:25, why sacrifice the bishop? Isn't QD5 better threatening mate and forking the knight? What is Blacks response here?Also, at 22:30, after white bishop takes D5, Kf6, isn't the main line Bxf7+, KExf7, QxD8, Bb2+, Qd2, Bxd2, Kxd2? It's a lopsided end game, but I think White can have an ok game.
Dan Nathan 14:25 1..Ng5 2. Nxg5 Qxg5 3. Qxf7 Kd8 At least black now has an awesome queen. So just taking the pawn with Bxf7+ followed by Qd5+ and QxN is preferable. A common trick with these gambits is this idea with defending f7 from mate by playing Ng5, and then when the knight gets captured you free the d8 square for the king with Qxg5
This is the refutation of the Danish Gambit proper, but I have had some success playing a similar line, but with Nf3 and Nc6 inserted. In this line, after d7-d5, White can, instead of taking with the bishop, play exd5, hitting the Nc6. My experience is that White can maintain compensation for the pawns in this line.
Btw, aside from the line with taking both pawns & then following with d5, there are also 2 other interesting options for black which unfortunately weren't covered: Very popular is 3...d5, which should equalize immediately. And then there's the 3...Qe7!? line which IM Christof Sielecki (ChessExplained on TH-cam) mentioned recently. (Also, the famous endgame after 1. e4 e5 2. d4 exd4 3. c3 dxc3 4. Bc4 cxb2 5. Bxb2 d5 6. Bxd5 Nf6 7. Bxf7+ Kxf7 8. Qxd8 Bb4+ 9. Qd2 Bxd2+ 10. Nxd2 should at least be mentioned in a Danish Gambit video...)
hmm I don't really like the lecture. I have no idea why the lines were chosen for black. queen on e7 seem stupid to play with the king not castleing right after it. wouldn't the best interest of black be to castle on the queenside and force white to trade their bishops? BTW sicilian dragon would be awesome
Along t same line as "maybe trying to castle if playing a beginner" after having moved ones king. Maybe you could also try taking your opponent's queen off t board when he isn't looking . I bet that would be a devastatingly winning tactic if you could get away w it.
This comment is really old, but Bf7+ doesn't work since after king takes the bishop on f7 and Q×d8, black can play Bb4+, creating a discovered attack on the queen and winning it on the next move (or whenever it's possible without hanging the bishop on b4)
I've been playing the Danish for quite a while, but my main problem with it is black playing d6 and Be6 attacking my white bishop. What do I do against this system?
I prefer the Alhekine Variation of the Danish Gambit where white plays 4. Nxc3 instead of allowing a third pawn capture. Not as rapid of development but safer.
noooo minute 19.20 is a mutttttch better move!!!!!! directly sacrifice your lightsquare bishop on F7 with check, he has to take with his king and you follow up with Queen on B3 check and win the darksquare bishop back!
At 14:41, instead of the "thematic sacrifice" of Bxf7+, try instead Qd5, threatening Qxf7# on the next move. This wins the knight on e4 outright. PS: I'm not familiar with these lines, so if there's a refutation or a positional reason not to do that, I don't know it.
Good question; I thought the same thing. Qd5 is probably what I would play seeing the position for the first time - but there is a way out for Black. 8...Ng5 saves the knight and protects the f7 square. White will play 9.Nxg5, the idea clearly being that Black doesn't have time to recapture with the Queen because then Qxf7+ is a good position for White. However, Black can play 9...Bb4+ first, then take the knight, and the game is more or less even.
At 22:56 you can not play as black Nf6 simply because of Bf7+ , king has to go to e7 due to attack queen , and then you trade queens with better end game!
After Ke7 white should play Ba3+. That would leave black no other choice but to play Kxf7 allowing whites queen Qxd8 without any threat of white losing its queen. Even if black was to play Qd6 blocking check Bxd6+ still only losing one bishop for a queen
7. Bxf7+ Kxf7 8. Qxd8 Bb4+ regains the queen, going into an opposite coloured bishop ending which is considered very slightly better for black, as it's easier for him to advance his majority on the q-side than it is for white on the k-side.
When you move Ne4 wouldn't be better to move to Ng4? Then he would take the free piece or move foward and take it, and with the next free move Nf2 to attack the Queen and Rook? If not, why would that be a bad move? -Aurora
1. Bf7 kf7 Qd8 Bb4 checks the king and attacks the queen with the rook,Qd2 Bd2,and black has a favourable endgame,because his queenside pawns are easier to push. 2. After d5 white plays ed6(en passant)
Oliver Marti Ng5 saves the day. And "removing the guard" of the f7 square with Nxg5 leads to this line 1. Qd5 Ng5! 2. Nxg5 Qxg5 3. Qxf7+ Kd8 Black has managed to activate his queen massively, and you will unfortunately not win a full piece there Ng5 protecting f7, and when the knight gets captured Qxg5 frees the d8 square is a common trick in these gambit lines
22:57 why not take with the bishop Bxf7+. If the King takes back Kxf7, Qxd8 taking blacks queen. If King does not take back and moves Ke7 protecting the Queen white plays Ba3+ leaving backs King no choice but to play Kxf7 which white plays Qxd8 taking blacks queen. Either way white loses a bishop for a queen.
i tried to increase the speed of the video and still managed to watch only for 5 minutes.. the presentation was so boring i had to choose another source..
scarscrews Exactly! I've been playing strictly the Danish Gambit for over a year now. It's so much fun and really underrated. The only way to really refute it gets black in a position with which players from my rating don't really know how to play.
Yeah exactly ! You certainly know these already but if you don't, you might want to look at the Goering Gambit in the Scotch gambit ; and the Jerome Gambit as well In the Goering Gambit, you can get an improved Danish gambit because you are allowed to castle kingside 1 e4 e5, 2 Nf3 Nc6, 3 d4 exd4, 4 Bc4 Bb4, 5 c3 dxc3, 6 O-O cxb2, 7 Bxb2 The Jerome Gambit is way more suspicious and way crazier than the Danish (yes it is possible) But the results are more suspicious too haha
@23:15 why not take the F7 pawn with Bishop?! If king recaptures you get Queen; only legal move is King e7 whcih is putting black in a world of hurt! Bishop next and that queen is eventually going down!
Black moving the Q initially is not covered! Bad omission for a video as this move is attacked the pawn and may attack with a dangerous check if white covers the pawn! Go back to your Cafe.
Black could just castle and the position would be fine. You can double black's pawns on the kingside if you want, but you just traded your strong bishop and queen for it, essentially removing your attack. Black could also choose to play Bxd2+, forcing white to lose his castling rights when he moves or takes the bishop. In the end, black could safely say that they are ahead in pawns and that white has no real compensation anymore
Don't want to be too rude, but this lecture is kind of soporific and really slow compared to others SLCC lectures, even if accelerated at 1.25. Also, the lines chosen for black are a bit odd... get to the point please, and choose the best lines !
14:37 why not Qd5 threatening mate in one then taking the knight for free instead of sacrificing (actually just trading) the bishop? I get that it's not always about material but this still seems like a great attacking position me. I play Danish gambit and would like to know if I'm wrong here
@@erfanul666 neither knight can play g6, did you mean f6 or g5? Nf6 doesn't prevent mate Ng5, White plays Nxg5, black can't retake with queen after because if black does this, white wins with Qxf7#
A DAWG so if at this moment when black brings out his knight, if I move bishop takes f7+ how does black intend to save his queen? I think perhaps you are not all there
![[Sub Thai] APT. - ROSÉ & Bruno Mars](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bYjhzP8x_uc/mqdefault.jpg)
I want more videos from this guy. Some people say he is slow but I think it’s the perfect pace to learn if you are a beginner/intermediate
Need to put the video on 1.25 speed to make it watchable
i did that it worked thanks m8
@@TH-camr34172 This guy is painfully slow and unorganized.
@@rotagbhd lol but thats true
this guy is so agonizingly slow...he must be getting paid by the hour...not watchable
x1.5 worked for me. But what really matters is that he explains stuff well.
I found this just trying to search Danish gambit to learn (I'm a newbie) and I have to give all the credit to you Dennis for breaking it down so well.
Every time I try to open with a gambit the other player just don't bite
Glenn Dunn Because they’re smart
@@toesdoeswhoknows704 more like they do their best to be annoying
Tried the Danish twice so far and opponents accepted it all the way both times. Keep trying. :)
I played more than 100 times danish gambit and win .
Visit my channel
It usually works best in over the board chess
I've always liked the attacking principles of the Danish Gambit, and for that reason would strong recommend it to beginners trying to kick on to the next level, as it opens up opportunities to perfect skills like discovered skewers, forks, positional or calculated sacrifices and finding good squares for pieces (with the exception of the queen, where most Danish lines go against the usual principle of V-shaped movement to either kingside or queenside). I just don't think it has enough going for it at higher levels as black will usually know at what stage of the gambit that they wish to take their material advantage and start to concentrate on their own game (or indeed to decline it altogether). The end result in such cases is white losing a tempo to achieve something that black was relaxed about letting them achieve.
As black on the other hand I'm very open to off the wall openings at intermediate level, though the ones I like tend to be against 1. d4 rather than 1. e4. The old benoni (1...c5) for instance takes white way out of book very quickly. Would love it if that could be covered at some point as it wasn't on the list of top ten responses to 1. d4.
And congratulations in advance for what looks like 100,000 subscribers today!
Danish gambit is my favorite opening, I find it a strategic way to get material and more chances for aggressive attacks
To get material Pepelaugh
Very great opening. Who ever has discovered this gambit, include my salutations to him. Awsome
4:22 knight on the rimm will be captured with the queen without compensation for black...
That's why he doesnt play it I guess
Wow. Lots of improvements in the presentation, Dennis. First, more confidence, more smiling, more audience engagement, happier; second, good voice/tone throughout the video; and even threw in some joke about Johnathan in the opening.
You share the gambit that you actually play; Wonderful! How about you share 2 of your memorable games (of the opening/defense, about 5 min/game), one win and one loss; and explain the nice tactics and lessons which the audience can learn too.
Can't believe you let this guy replace Kummer! We want Mike back!
what are you talking about?
Mac C you Trump supporter?
Thank god that idiot Kummer is gone
A visa allows you to travel out of country.
on minute 23.00 you also can try the queen trap and take on F7 with the bishop check. If the king takes the bishop you take his queen :D sometimes it works
At 14:25, why sacrifice the bishop? Isn't QD5 better threatening mate and forking the knight? What is Blacks response here?Also, at 22:30, after white bishop takes D5, Kf6, isn't the main line Bxf7+, KExf7, QxD8, Bb2+, Qd2, Bxd2, Kxd2? It's a lopsided end game, but I think White can have an ok game.
Dan Nathan 14:25 1..Ng5 2. Nxg5 Qxg5 3. Qxf7 Kd8
At least black now has an awesome queen. So just taking the pawn with Bxf7+ followed by Qd5+ and QxN is preferable.
A common trick with these gambits is this idea with defending f7 from mate by playing Ng5, and then when the knight gets captured you free the d8 square for the king with Qxg5
If you wanna know how to blunt this line with Black, go directly to 22:30.
And that's exactly why we don't see this opening in tournaments anymore...
This is the refutation of the Danish Gambit proper, but I have had some success playing a similar line, but with Nf3 and Nc6 inserted. In this line, after d7-d5, White can, instead of taking with the bishop, play exd5, hitting the Nc6. My experience is that White can maintain compensation for the pawns in this line.
Interesting. Black, after c3 in your line, must answer with the immediate ...d5 with equality.
BixenteFabregas Yes, d5 spoils all of White's fun, but that's true of the line without Nf3/Nc6 too.
Btw, aside from the line with taking both pawns & then following with d5, there are also 2 other interesting options for black which unfortunately weren't covered:
Very popular is 3...d5, which should equalize immediately.
And then there's the 3...Qe7!? line which IM Christof Sielecki (ChessExplained on TH-cam) mentioned recently.
(Also, the famous endgame after 1. e4 e5 2. d4 exd4 3. c3 dxc3 4. Bc4 cxb2 5. Bxb2 d5 6. Bxd5 Nf6 7. Bxf7+ Kxf7 8. Qxd8 Bb4+ 9. Qd2 Bxd2+ 10. Nxd2 should at least be mentioned in a Danish Gambit video...)
BixenteFabregas I played this in a tourn in 2013 and won
Great presentation! Thanks!
7:47: Knight before bishop
Even though both bishops are currently hyperactive, and up to this point, white has not touched the knight
he's talking about Nc6 from black's perspective there
i have to imagine most of his opponents in the cafes just resign when he starts talking
Hhhhhhhhhh
I have a question: Instead of Pawn captures b2, black played Bishop b4 . Would wo mind to explain that variation? Sorry for my horroble English.
Caro-kann karpov variation please!! (4. Nd7) Great video! :)
Thank you very much sir. Well explained!
hmm I don't really like the lecture. I have no idea why the lines were chosen for black. queen on e7 seem stupid to play with the king not castleing right after it. wouldn't the best interest of black be to castle on the queenside and force white to trade their bishops?
BTW sicilian dragon would be awesome
Sicilian Dragon will not be presented by LaRue. Far too complex.
Along t same line as "maybe trying to castle if playing a beginner" after having moved ones king. Maybe you could also try taking your opponent's queen off t board when he isn't looking . I bet that would be a devastatingly winning tactic if you could get away w it.
23:00 isnt it smarter to play F7 with the bishop
It'd be smart for a 1200 rated. But in such an open game, I'd prefer bishops over knights any day of the week and twice on Sundays.
This comment is really old, but Bf7+ doesn't work since after king takes the bishop on f7 and Q×d8, black can play Bb4+, creating a discovered attack on the queen and winning it on the next move (or whenever it's possible without hanging the bishop on b4)
@@Terrashark then Qd2, Bxd2 Kxd2. material is equal in this line, and id prefer black but its not like white is straight up losing.
I played more than 100 times danish gambit and win .
Visit my channel
at 23:00, can't white play Bxf7+ ? if King takes back we take his Queen and if Ke7, play Ba3+ . am i missing something?
Bxf7+, Kxf7, Qxd8, Bb4+ with discovered attack on the queen, winning it back
Right. That's what i was missing...
Thanks
opening is fire, the music I mean
:|
>:(
I've been playing the Danish for quite a while, but my main problem with it is black playing d6 and Be6 attacking my white bishop. What do I do against this system?
You can probably just take it since the f lawn has to take and that opens up a diagonal for your queen
Why so many thumbs down? Fine performance, nice flow, he obviously knows the opening with sidelines.
I prefer the Alhekine Variation of the Danish Gambit where white plays 4. Nxc3 instead of allowing a third pawn capture. Not as rapid of development but safer.
This gambit is not for the safe. It is to maximize risk, to maximize reward. Go out and get some checkmates
noooo minute 19.20 is a mutttttch better move!!!!!! directly sacrifice your lightsquare bishop on F7 with check, he has to take with his king and you follow up with Queen on B3 check and win the darksquare bishop back!
At 14:41, instead of the "thematic sacrifice" of Bxf7+, try instead Qd5, threatening Qxf7# on the next move. This wins the knight on e4 outright.
PS: I'm not familiar with these lines, so if there's a refutation or a positional reason not to do that, I don't know it.
Good question; I thought the same thing. Qd5 is probably what I would play seeing the position for the first time - but there is a way out for Black. 8...Ng5 saves the knight and protects the f7 square. White will play 9.Nxg5, the idea clearly being that Black doesn't have time to recapture with the Queen because then Qxf7+ is a good position for White. However, Black can play 9...Bb4+ first, then take the knight, and the game is more or less even.
he is better than anyone else
The acetylcholine levels on the brain of this guy must to be really high
At 22:56 you can not play as black Nf6 simply because of Bf7+ , king has to go to e7 due to attack queen , and then you trade queens with better end game!
After Ke7 white should play Ba3+. That would leave black no other choice but to play Kxf7 allowing whites queen Qxd8 without any threat of white losing its queen. Even if black was to play Qd6 blocking check Bxd6+ still only losing one bishop for a queen
at 12:11 , Qxe5 is actually the best move for black
22:56 Black needs to play Nc6 not Nf6. After Nf6 Bxf7+ and black is in big trouble
7. Bxf7+ Kxf7 8. Qxd8 Bb4+ regains the queen, going into an opposite coloured bishop ending which is considered very slightly better for black, as it's easier for him to advance his majority on the q-side than it is for white on the k-side.
When you move Ne4 wouldn't be better to move to Ng4? Then he would take the free piece or move foward and take it, and with the next free move Nf2 to attack the Queen and Rook? If not, why would that be a bad move?
-Aurora
sometimes they chose to ignore Nc6 tho and just go Qe7 from the get go. This doesnt allow the castle cuz of the pawn hanging, what do I do then?
What if they don’t bite
Caro kann karpov variation please!! (4. Nd7)
Can you do the sicilian dragon?Great vid!
for your next trick, show us the Stonewall against a hedgehogged King's Indian Defense.
At 23:10 he moves knight to C3, why not attack e7 pawn with bishop; force check and still safe from king countertake due to the exposed queen check?
Oh, bishop check reveals the rook queen check. Makes sense
23:00 Bxf7 is stronger
And 21:58 what do you do if black goes d5?
1. Bf7 kf7 Qd8 Bb4 checks the king and attacks the queen with the rook,Qd2 Bd2,and black has a favourable endgame,because his queenside pawns are easier to push.
2. After d5 white plays ed6(en passant)
Take en passant ofcourse
14.24: What is the drawback of playling Qd5 threatening mate and Ne4 at the same time directly instead of sacrificing the bishop on f7?
Oliver Marti Ng5 saves the day. And "removing the guard" of the f7 square with Nxg5 leads to this line
1. Qd5 Ng5! 2. Nxg5 Qxg5 3. Qxf7+ Kd8
Black has managed to activate his queen massively, and you will unfortunately not win a full piece there
Ng5 protecting f7, and when the knight gets captured Qxg5 frees the d8 square is a common trick in these gambit lines
thanks man :)
22:57 why not take with the bishop Bxf7+. If the King takes back Kxf7, Qxd8 taking blacks queen. If King does not take back and moves Ke7 protecting the Queen white plays Ba3+ leaving backs King no choice but to play Kxf7 which white plays Qxd8 taking blacks queen. Either way white loses a bishop for a queen.
Ben should do that video!
What about 3.... Qe7? Or 3... d6? Or 4...d6? I m usded to play this line against theese moves I have always problem
Why not prepare the bishop sacrifice better by going queen b3 earlier on
i tried to increase the speed of the video and still managed to watch only for 5 minutes.. the presentation was so boring i had to choose another source..
Very informative
Could you do a counter-attack against the Sicilian with 2.d4?. It would help me a lot. Thanks.
Benjamin Mendieta smith morra gambit, strongly regarded for a gambit.
Eric Rosen did a video on that on this channel
Edit: Forget it was a video on countering the Sicilian with Nc3
I am a 1200 and using this opening I drew against a 1600
Not bad for his first lecture...
At 23:03 play bishop f7 to stop castles and maybe even take the queen
7. Bxf7+ Kxf7 8. Qxd8 Bb4+ and now you can show your endgame skills (which are probably terrible if you are a gambit player).
Good teacher.
OMG I've been waiting for the Danish gambit since forever
It's so dubious and suspicious that your opponent might just resign after move 3
scarscrews Exactly! I've been playing strictly the Danish Gambit for over a year now. It's so much fun and really underrated. The only way to really refute it gets black in a position with which players from my rating don't really know how to play.
Yeah exactly !
You certainly know these already but if you don't, you might want to look at the Goering Gambit in the Scotch gambit ; and the Jerome Gambit as well
In the Goering Gambit, you can get an improved Danish gambit because you are allowed to castle kingside
1 e4 e5, 2 Nf3 Nc6, 3 d4 exd4, 4 Bc4 Bb4, 5 c3 dxc3, 6 O-O cxb2, 7 Bxb2
The Jerome Gambit is way more suspicious and way crazier than the Danish (yes it is possible)
But the results are more suspicious too haha
it is a risky gambit tho, for some reason it is not really working properly with me
Sicilian najdorf 6.Bg5 variation for white's side please
@23:15 why not take the F7 pawn with Bishop?! If king recaptures you get Queen; only legal move is King e7 whcih is putting black in a world of hurt! Bishop next and that queen is eventually going down!
Because of Bishop b4 after the Queen takes. Lol, that's balanced and nothing you want if you are a gambit player...
Why can't pawn capture B2 after c3
Great lecture! :)
Black moving the Q initially is not covered! Bad omission for a video as this move is attacked the pawn and may attack with a dangerous check if white covers the pawn! Go back to your Cafe.
This video was torture.
Using this gambit I just won a game in 7 moves.
Did he borrow Ben Finegold's shirt? He doesn't seem to quite fill it... :P
Would anyone be willing to explain to me why the move pawn to E5 was made at 19:02 and not Queen to F3!
Black could just castle and the position would be fine. You can double black's pawns on the kingside if you want, but you just traded your strong bishop and queen for it, essentially removing your attack. Black could also choose to play Bxd2+, forcing white to lose his castling rights when he moves or takes the bishop. In the end, black could safely say that they are ahead in pawns and that white has no real compensation anymore
no you cant move nf6 because Bxf7 and the blacks queen is hanging!
Kxf7
Qxd8 Bb4+
... Rxd8
I think he’s putting himself to sleep 🤦🏻♂️ why are you sooooooooo slowwwwwww had to put it on 1.25 speed
EXPLODED OPENING
has someone created a pgn from this video and is willing to share it?
Queen's Indian Defense please
at 22:59 if you play Bxf7+, KxBf7 then QxQd8 :| can't you do that?
Again, after QxQ, Bb4+ and the white queen is either taken by the rook, or if it block on d2, is taken by the checking bishop.
20:50 the black could play Bishop on D2
Not after white plays Bishop A3; the black bishop is then pinned.
12:00 Isn't Re1 much better then Nxe5 here?
Why is novak djokovic explaining chess with glasses and french beard
23:15, why not bf2
on 23 sec....be7 check then ba3 check thn its game over right ??
You know the king can take stuff right?
23:14 why not bxf7
This guy is hilarious!!!! And an excellent teacher.
I won a game with nf6 as black
put video x2 speed
at 22:55, why not Bx f7+?
Bxf7+, Kxf7. QxQ, Bb4+, Qd2, BxQ, KxQ. Attack is over, white cannot castle, and does not have compensation.
Don't want to be too rude, but this lecture is kind of soporific and really slow compared to others SLCC lectures, even if accelerated at 1.25. Also, the lines chosen for black are a bit odd... get to the point please, and choose the best lines !
Go home you're drunk teacher😂😂😂😂😂😂
so many mistakes in this video
14:37 why not Qd5 threatening mate in one then taking the knight for free instead of sacrificing (actually just trading) the bishop? I get that it's not always about material but this still seems like a great attacking position me.
I play Danish gambit and would like to know if I'm wrong here
Black plays Knight to g6 and trades Knights.
@@erfanul666 neither knight can play g6, did you mean f6 or g5?
Nf6 doesn't prevent mate
Ng5, White plays Nxg5, black can't retake with queen after because if black does this, white wins with Qxf7#
@23:12 ... Nf6? Bxf7+!
at 23:10 how on earth he didn't move Bdxf7? if Kxf7 then QxQ
or if Ke7 then Bba3+ : c5, Bxc5 : Kxf7, QxQ
what kind of instructor miss that?
After QxQ, Bb4+ and the white queen is lost.
Why keep calling a pin (e file) a skewer? It's giving me a headache.
21:58 if black plays d5
Then you take en passant with the middle pawn
Nice guy …
Seems logical
He's trying so hard to add wit and humor, it's a little bit distracting.
3:10
the lecturer is grimacing too much. (is not he drunk a bit? :D) Love the danish though
23:02 bishop takes f7 good game. please i would like you to refute me. wtf????
i can't really believe you missed that. i don't need a computer to take f7 and then beat the hell out of black.
After Qxd8 then Bb4+ and after king moves then Rxd8
But you do need a computer to see the refutation apparently.
Zander Rossman no computer required lol
A DAWG so if at this moment when black brings out his knight, if I move bishop takes f7+ how does black intend to save his queen? I think perhaps you are not all there
I couldn't watch it. Even at 1,25x it's too boring
Creepy guy!!!
4 more subscribers for 100k!!!
Too much talking, too little showing. See Gotham Chess how the work must be done.
poor lecture..
Shiv Shekhar Kumar you are a poor lettuce
This guy drags things out so long, he could spend one hour explaining how to microwave a cup of noodles.