A friend of mine once posted on Fb a post that was telling you how to say some certain things in a very professional language. I thought that they were the most offensive responses you cannot fight back against.
Pretty sure the physical retribution, even in the form of a tattoo, would be considered a criminal act. Legally speaking, the tattoo artist would have zero defense. She’s could also sue for pain and suffering and could easily win. Not sure it really happened. Plus wouldn’t she know something was up when he suddenly started tattooing the middle of her back?
Yes this thank you. I've worked for and around tattoo artists for years and that's not ok. You created a verbal contract with her and you both broke it and your part can't be fixed with some money. She's going to want laser tattoo removal and you'll have to pay for that minus what she owed you. Tit for tat is not smart in this case.
@@pyro014 I know it is. Not saying I agree because it is very much illegal and shouldn’t be taken as a standard, but I do understand what the artist is getting at.
This is why I never want anything tattooed on my back! even though I'd pay them. I want to be able to see the finished work without a mirror. I've seen some photos of really awful back tats.
Back tattoos (specially full back tattoos) are super expensive because is SO MUCH area to cover. If you factor the difficulty of the design, and the reputation of the artist it can only get even more expensive. So what people do? They forget this will take at least a year to finish and ball at the high prices for the full product (as an example I'm quoting a floral full back and the prices are running from 6-9k at the moment, we are still working on design but it might get to 10k in the end) and go for a cheap one, a "my friend can do it for 2k" type of deal... And well, they get what they paid for.
@@BeriaLima - I'd never really gone into the prices and labour involved in a full back tattoo, as it's not something I'm interested in: my tattoos are all private statements and so are where I can see them, and covered by clothing in the normal course of events. I've seen photos of some absolutely amazing full-back tats, though, and whatever they cost, they were worth it.
That story is just BS when you do that to someone as an tatoo artist you can get sued and maybe end up in prison depending on where you are because you are harming someone. And what would the Tatoo Artist do? Counter sue because she didn`t pay in time for a dick on her back? Bla!
Story 1: And that's why you shouldn't be racist. We live in a time where racism basically should be a thing of the past, yet a lot of people are too stubborn to accept that.
With the mixed, muddled, and beautifully melded racial backgrounds so many of us have - I genuinely don't understand how we're still racist as a cultural.
Right? I never understood how they could be to begin with, but I learned it can be taught as a child which I actually had a few things I thought was right but tbh also seems stupid thinking about it now and I'm glad I learned but my parents and grandparents refuse. My dad thinks that all Mexicans are bad and gonna SA my mom and me. Which if anything hes the kinda person who'd do that
@@Maeve.Kieran.420 It's often taught by life experience. Most people confused by racism grew up away from poverty. If you grew up around trashy people you will find some common factor to generalize them.
Sadly prejudice is human nature. While it is something the world will be better without, I fear it will always exist in some form. Even the most open minded person will find their mind hit by prejudiced thoughts from time to time, even if they do not act on them.
Even if it was illegal and Scott took them to court and won, I think it would've been a pyrrhic victory. Because OP would've at some point tell them that it was because of racism that they what they did and they probably would had evidence for it too. So Scott's reputation would've been ruined from it.
In principle, you should be right, but in practice, the opposite is true. It doesn't matter if it's "illegal" or not, it's civil litigation, not a criminal case. And over 90% of civil suits settle out of court, and typically with a mutual non-disclosure agreement, so nobody's reputation would be hurt because nobody outside the involved parties would ever know. And if it ever did get leaked by OP's company, not only would they be liable for breaching the non-disclosure agreement (and probably their original contracted terms that usually have a clause to ensure such discretion), but also, it would hurt their reputation more if prospective clients found out they were not being discreet about their dealings with other members of their clientele. Would you hire a company that bad-mouthed its clients? Of course not. So nobody will ever know. Beyond that, the court doesn't care if "Scott" was a racist. That's not the issue at hand. It's a simple matter of whether OP's company fulfilled its end of the contract for lead generation. So it would never be proven (or even mentioned) that Scott has a racial bias in taking contracts. That's speculative, with no proof, and is immaterial to the case, even if a review of the evidence makes it obvious. It's still not the point of any potential litigation. Just mentioning it would piss off a judge because they'd be wasting the court's time with irrelevant arguments. If OP said that publically, they and/or their company would be open to lawsuits for slander and/or libel. But then, this was never going to court, lol. Not a chance. Nothing was ever even going to be filed. Putting aside the fact that Scott's primary complaint was that he lost his discount (which isn't something you can really sue for, there are no damages to recover so he doesn't have a case at all), there is still one other glaring issue with Scott's statement... Every single person who has ever uttered the phrase "I'm going to call my lawyer" as an ultimatum A) Doesn't have a lawyer. B) Doesn't have a case. C) Doesn't know the first thing about how civil litigation works. D) Will never find an attorney willing to work with a pompous know-it-all, jackass of a client. This is a universal truth. When someone threatens you with a call to their lawyer, it means they're vulnerable, you hold all the cards, and you should immediately pounce on them. That statement is an admission of defeat for people who are too stupid and stubborn to vocalize an actual concession. That statement has never intimidated anyone with an IQ above the ambient room temperature. It's just the last spiteful cry of someone who's about to run out of the room in tears, with their hands covering their genitals, who's about to have an emotional breakdown because they lost. You know how slurred or incoherent speech is viewed as an early warning sign that someone is having a stroke? Similarly "I'm going to call my lawyer" is likewise just a precursor to a grown-up temper tantrum, lol. "I'm going to call my lawyer" should be music to your ears... it means you've already won. You will not actually hear from their lawyer. On the extremely remote possibility that they do seek legal consultation, as soon as they explain their complaint, the lawyer will nope-the-fuck-out. If they actually had a case, they'd have argued the merits with you instead of resorting to empty threats. These are words never spoken by people who mean it. This is doubly true if you are threatening a business, to which you are a client. They know their business better than you. It's a safe assumption that people in the business have structured their contracts and policies in such a way as to limit their liability because they actually want to stay in business. Most of the time, they will be operating within those parameters. And if they're not, there's no need to make such threats. In the real world, you don't tip your hand. If you have a lawyer and you are intent on having them file a lawsuit, you don't warn the person you're going to sue and give them a chance to cover their ass, lol. Like on TV, one spouse always says to the other, very dramatically "I want a divorce"... in the real world, only idiots say that. That's essentially saying "Hey, cash out all the bank accounts quick so you don't have to share it with me", lol. You don't warn people of impending legal action. That's like rule #1. The first time they hear about it should be when they're served with either the lawsuit or a C&D or something of that nature. Even if you are just trying to intimidate them, those words are only potentially scary in writing, on the letterhead of an actual law firm, or better, service from the court itself. If you are ever threatened with a lawyer, you can and should call their bluff 100% of the time. You have all the leverage in that scenario, use it.
@@cuernosbeste I mean, of course you shouldn't. But that's like saying: don't taunt a psychopath. Wise advice for sure, but if he then murders you that's still not okay on his part.
Story 2: this is why A: any business owners should ask for a part of the money before they start on something like that so they at least have some cash
second story reminds me of the recent trend of tattoo artists tattooing their signatures on their clients bodies without their consent. both are an easy win in court. like yeah, it sucks that she didnt pay but that would have been solvable in small claims. there is absolutely no need to bodily harm someone just bc theyre a jackass to you.
Story 2: Regardless if she can pay or not you have to go through legal services tattooing ANYTHING on somebody without their permission from a signature hidden in the work or an image they didn't request is illegal on multiple levels ranging from simple tattoo negligence to full blown assault, which can result in a hefty lawsuit as well as losing your license to tattoo. The 'victim' even if she didn't pay would walk away with vastly more money than the tattoo would cost and the artist would be paying for it. The artist in the story only got away with it because the customer wasn't very smart clearly.
I figured in this scenario, you wouldn't really want to go to a cop and say 'well I scammed him out of 10k worth of cash so he tattooed a dick between the art i stole.'
It's especially stupid, when you're trying to mess with a specialist. There was one guy, who pissed off his car mechanic so much, the mechanic put few frozen fishes under the back seat in his car...
@@urgon6321 That might be funny for a little bit but if that ruined some expensive stuff, well it won't be funny much longer if the affected can prove the mechanic did it. Considering we potentially know about it, means the mechanic blabbed about it a lot. Not a good idea.
@@jboy804, usually under the back seat there is only car floor. We once had to remove it from our family car and we found there some rusted watched that were smuggled in 1980's, probably from West Germany. More modern cars, especially high-end ones could hide there quite a bit of mechanical and electrical components, like heaters, seat articulation and adjustment mechanisms, etc. I assume a good mechanic would know, what to avoid. Besides, potential damage must be above certain monetary value for police to investigate, and either prosecution or judge can dismiss the case anyway...
1) Never mess with the Business Consultant 2) Never mess with the IT Guy/Lady 3) Never mess with any laws, especially tree laws. Scott messed with 2 out of the 3: IT Lady and Business Consultant
Wonder what happened to the tattoo artist...An Austrian tattoo artist did something similar and put a 16inch dong on a guy, got charged for causing bodily harm and got 3.5 years in jail.
yeah, thats why what the artist did is so stupid and that story should not be pro-revenge, but the setup for a pro-revenge. yeah the chick was a greedy asshole, but dude, come on, thats not how you get revenge.
As "justified" as it might have seemed at the time permanently disfiguring someone over a few thousand dollars is just not right... ever... There are ways to get his money if he wanted but she has no way to fix what he did... (at least not without more time and money she obviously doesn't have...) She 100% was in the wrong for nonpayment but this is defiantly one of those "two wrongs don't make a right" situations. Plus, even without court involvement, dude is wrecking his and the shops reputation on this stupid act. There is no way she didn't blast them online for this and, even with the fact of nonpayment, people will still see how unprofessional they acted overall.
the worst part about the racist is that he seemed to leave money on the table so he wouldn't work with or for black people and then seemed to be surprised why he wasn't making money.
This guy does prove one thing to me. There's a sliding scale of racism, and this is probably the most extreme you can go without blood and violence. I've seen a genuinely racist guy hiring and working for POC individuals, but talking behind their back about their performance/homes/etc while being much more lenient on his white workers, who fall asleep on the job (they work in a landscaping-adjacent field) or actually steal from him/threaten his life.
Why's she so upset? She got a multi-thousand dollar tattoo for free. It just has a saluting phallus up her spine, with wings coming off it. ... ... LOL
Story 2: I would NEVER suggest doing this in retribution. It's could result in criminal and civil penalties (as well as being psycho). You can be heavily sued and even potentially go to jail for this. Yes, it is technically theft from the affected person, but if you ever got that in front of a jury that would be very bad. That was literally semi-permanent retribution easily shown in court (that the tattoo artist definitely didn't get informed consent to perform). That's why I said possible criminal, but likely just heavily civil. Yes the tattoo artist can asked to be paid, but the amount the affected can ask for both the pain and suffering and the removal cost is going to trump that in spades. What do you do instead? Just don't finish it psycho and go to collections agency.
That's what I thought. It's also sad some comments say good on the artist even though it's illegal. Couldn't he just called the cops on the girl to force her to pay instead of getting himself in legal problems?
@@stormshadow2838 It's not only illegal, but it's quite immoral to assault someone for non-payment (immoral and non-legal don't always line up). Cops won't do much for non-payment for a continual service. They'll likely refer it to civil court (AKA small claims), as debtor's jail is suppose to not be thing now (although there is an indirect debtor's jail with government based fines but that's another discussion). EDIT: There is a thing called theft of services which could be used to charge the patron (which I'm going to refer to as debtor's prison 2.0), but the tattoo artist will almost certainly either never see the money then or not for a LONG time. If the patron claims non-payment is due to dissatisfaction, they likely wipe their hands of it and tell them to go to civil court (assuming the patron was smart enough to do this). They could never literally force the patron to pay, maybe try to convince them to at best.
The tatooer would be charged with aggravated assault which is a felony. Ridiculous story. Physically mutilating someone over money they owe you is mafia territory.
That last story is really bad on the tattoo artist. The customer can sue because that's not how you handle that situation. If my tattoo artist did that, I would just expect them to sue or ask for payment, stopping the tattoo. That artist should have known better. Non-payment is bad, but that revenge on her?
Yeah that would've been an open and shut case against the tattoo artist that would've probably not only cost him his license, but required that he pay the cost of having it removed. It'd be right up there with an electrician realizing he's not going to get paid, so he intentionally miswires the house. He'd be 100% liable for any damage that happens as a result.
She's a douch. The artist wasn't a complete stranger so it was probably not just the non payment. The non payment was probably an opportunity for revenge
Except what the artist did is regret dangerous, like in the realm of being sued into the ground dangerous. Doesn’t matter if she had the money or not. What he should have done is just turned her away, instead he basically committed a form of “assault” that a lawyer could definitely argue and spin to make him pay out the nose for. There are tons of stories of tattooists getting sued over bad tattoos what do you think would happen over something like this that’s more deliberate and malicious.
On the porting numbers question. I worked for a company that managed call centers all over the US and Canada, and we had in our contract that any numbers we managed for the client had so many days more than 30 in OP case that we would hold onto them for. Most of the time it would go like this. We would forward the number to them, and they were expected to request the number to be moved to their account at the phone company. If they needed help doing it, we would help, but we couldn't do it for them as it was their account it was moving to. After the contracted time, if they hadn't moved the number, it was up to us was we did with the number. However, it was a manual process, so we had many accounts where their number was forwarded for years, and we never caught it. That the fun began. We were moving to an entirely new phone switch. All numbers had to be ported, and all accounts had to be setup. We used the billing system for the process, and any numbers we didn't have in the billing system we simply parked. Think pointing the number at a generic message that the number wasn't active. All of a sudden, a ton of clients phone numbers stopped working for them, and they had to track down what was going on. We had a lot of returning clients that month :)
Tattoo story: I've heard stories of people trying to stiff tattoo artist, as a reminder for history tattoo parlours use to be extremely dangerous the kind you'd never walk into. Tattoo parlours are the place to shake you down and carry bat's behind the counter, these are people who can happily give you ink but are usually the kind who've got some heavy pasts so don't fuck around.
Wait- did TH-cam delete my comment or am I just crazy and clicked on the wrong one lol But either way I agree with you I said in the previous comment that I believed it was creepy for a man to tattoo that on a woman, but looking through the comments again, it seems that the artist was a woman. My bad, still doesn't change anything, I still think it's weird to leave a tattoo of a nature like that without consent, no matter the circumstances.
For the last story, I wouldn’t be surprised if what the tattoo artist did would be considered assault or something similar. The woman can’t do anything about it without getting herself in legal trouble but there still playing with fire. (Edit: typo)
There wouldn't be any legal trouble from not having paid. If she hasn't paid then you simply refuse to continue until she does or take her to court for that. What they say was done is outright a crime that could absolutely get their business shut down though. Not that it matters because it's so blatantly nonsense it's obviously made up. Only a seriously brain damaged person would think there isn't going to be a pro bono legal boning coming their way regardless of the money status of the client if they did that. And even if they counter sue at that point it would just be deducted from the business shattering payout.
@@RunicSigils Like one comment on here said, if the lady can't cough up money for a tattoo, she does NOT have the money for a lawyer. Though, I'm not saying that I fully agree with what happened. I would've just refused to finish :) Good luck explaining why parts of your wings aren't finished.
yeah, i would not go to that artist for a tattoo and i'm gonna warn off everyone i know who wants a tattoo from that guy. thats just wrong on so many levels
No, its not illegal. ive worked with several phone service providers. Technically speaking those CTN's are "bought" and will be used as asset by your company. It is by your prerogative as company how to use it as per contract with customers. once your contract ended with your customers and as per your policy, you can port the number to the customer or use it again as company asset.
last story is nuclear revenge since it's illegal. artist should've just sued and not finished. now he's probably being sued, and sure maybe nothin will come of it but it's still a hassle on top of fees for lawyers.
Why on earth would you ever get a service without having the money, I think that is dumb, but then again tattoo parlours attract a small population of people who think art should not be paid for. IDK, As an tattoo artist, can’t you ask for some sort of payment upfront, especially on a piece that’s going to cost the artist many hours and ink? Putting money on the table tells you if the customer is actually serious or just talk.
I ask for half the payment up front and half when I'm completed *and* they're satisfied (I'll make reasonable adjustments and improvements if they want to fix or change anything once they've seen it completed); good customer service gets tips and loyal clients.
Story 1 the legality there is definitely questionable. Telecom providers cannot reassign a phone number for at least 45 days after it goes out of service. Now this guy didn't work for a telecom provider, but I'm pretty sure the same FCC regulations apply there too, since it was effectively some guy's business number.
That last story is highly illegal. She could have had his business shut down. If he wanted to take her to court, ok. But I don't agree with the tattoo artist's decision to mark her permanently with something offensive like that. I kind of don't believe it, tbh
14:15 no rslash. she said scott owned them. she had the codes to switch them to whom ever's account she wanted to. she was technically supposed to just let the numbers die and other people would get that number from whoever scott's phone provider was.
It takes an extra level of stupid to screw over your tattoo artist, especially when they're in the middle of doing a piece in a place that you can't see while being tattooed.
The last story was way out of line. Three artist should have stopped the tattoo and sued her for non payment, not permanently change her skin against her consent. Now THE CUSTOMER has a lawsuit instead of the artist
yeah, i thought that was a really stupid thing to do too. i get greedy assholes that refuse to pay for services, but what that artist did was even worse imo
@@pazvega5895 That doesn't give the artist the right to permanently disfigure her. This isn't revenge, it's just a straight-up, preplanned crime on the artists part.
last story, the tattoo artist is in the wrong no matter what. It is ILLEGAL to do that NO MATTER WHAT! I seriously hope she sues him or calls the cops on him because that was unprofessional and awful to do that to anyone!
@@Tustin2121 Calling the cops is free mate, but you stop doing the tattoo and sue yourself in small claims court. What he did is bodily mutilation as she did not consent to having a dick up her spine. Also her not paying doesn't mean she is poor, she could have just not wanted to pay a large amount. On top of that, if she did sue, she can make a lot of money of of that AND get a free tattoo removal service
@@liviwaslost In the modern day, why wouldn't they? Any lawyer would basically take that on contingency. If there's money to be made, which is certainly the case here, the affected person would win a decent amount. If on the other hand you mean the affected person is too stupid to ask for charges or get lawyers considering he know the tattoo artist knew of the non-payment BEFORE doing the last step... that's an entirely different question.
The "tattoo artist" in the last story actually commited grievous bodily harm, at least in German law. My wife is a tattoo artist and it literally does not matter if she payed or not, if the artist does not tattoo what was agreed upon, he/she/itdoesn'tmatter can be sued to bankruptcy even here in Germany. This behaviour should not be condoned or even praised.
That tattoo artist deserves jail time. Yes, he has the right to be paid for his work, but there's a system for that. Small claims court. Instead he branded someone.
In Germany tatooing a person with an image that was not part of the contract is body harming and illegal. you have to pay the removing, you have to pay a hugh fine for body harming, you have to pay for emotional damages. And perhaps they will close your business. And you will get no dime, even if you can proofe that she tried to betray you.
Well, personally I think permanently (or mostly permanently as there is tattoo removal) marking someone with an image they didn’t consent to it crossing some kind of line, but am also reveling in her getting what she had coming, especially after being stupid enough to let the artist do the work after letting him know of her intentions to stiff him. (Pun intended)
Porting the tracked numbers to the new customer would be intentional interference with contractual relations. Your contract with Company A allows you to cancel service if you don't get paid. It doesn't allow you to direct Company A's customers to Company B, especially if Company B pays you a commission. Also, OP's contract with Company A almost certainly bars them from using customer info to help a competitor, especially if that competitor is paying them 40% extra.
I hope that tattoo artist doesn't have to pay the full price for her tattoo removal. That's not legal. I think he should have taken her to court and refused to finish instead of risking his reputation and legal issues. He has zero standing in a court case due to the fact that he broke the verbal contract. Had he not done that she would have to pay him plus the trouble but now he's going to have to deal with that. And honestly that could be a huge issue and cause him to go out of business.
Your company promised a service to two different customers when one of the customers didn't uphold their end of the contract but you still had all those customers second hand through that person you helped those customers get the service they need it there is nothing wrong with that.
Absolutely illegal for that tattoo artist to do that. You take the loss and not waste any more product! I'd not be surprised if he got into legal trouble for that.
dabney, i just discovered ur 2nd channel (for the past few days) and i loved it. it made me sad when i saw the last vid :( come back when u have time, please.
Im just imagining her going to get laser tattoo removal and having to explain that one... It cost more then a tattoo and you can't skip on the payments.
Why the hell would anyone tell a tattoo artist that they weren't paying for the work, while under the needle?.. .this should be in the best of Kevina category
I've heard that back way in the day someone was doing this transferring the number of one business to a similar business so the business owners created an automated telephone exchange so the person transferring numbers would lose her job.
Yes she stole a couple hours of work and a couple hundred dollars he committed a felony. She is going to own his business by the time she is done with him in court doesn't matter if she was originally going to steal from him. What he did was equivalent to going out and beating someone down because they owe you money
Grinning ear to ear with that last story with the tattoo artist. Ha ha! Much like not messing with certain groups, i.e. IT, veterans, farmers, etc, looks like tattoo artists can slot right on in.
What the ad OP did wasn't legal, but it wasn't illegal either. Scott waved his rights to those numbers and so it was the company's will to do with them as they pleased. At worst the OP would be in trouble with the company for an unauthorized addition of CTNs on a customer's account, but I'm sure they would overlook that after seeing the 40% sales increase from said customer. However, what the tattoo artist did absolutely is illegal and frankly I hate them for it. Tattoos are permanent, especially in the era that artist was in, so to permanently fk up the girl's back like that on purpose is absolutely grounds for a lawsuit. Nonpaying b or not, that just isn't acceptable l.
Tattooing someone with something they don't want is disgusting a f**k, not to mention illegal as fuck and is classed as assault. Ruining someone's body for the rest of their lives over a few hundred dollars is not ok.
I’m getting my first ever tattoo on Christmas this year and I’m way too scared something like that’ll happen to me when I go. I guess I’m more scared the tattoo artist isn’t LGBT friendly even tho the tattoo shop says they are 😓
Don't hate me for saying this lol but!..... As wrong as it is for the person to not pay for the tattoo....I feel the artist should have just stopped right there. Not done any more. Taken the person to court. Then make sure to put this person's name out there in the community so nobody will ever finish their work. I just feel this might... Just a little. Be overboard lol. I only have one tattoo for the fact I can't afford to get more. I know the cost! I would never do something like this but they are also permanent. Just a little torn on this lol. I think the person deserved but at the same time they didn't.
Your absolutely correct, what the artist did is not only immoral but illegal. The artist ceased to be the victim as soon as she started to tattoo with malicious intent. This is both assault and battery which would likely cost them their license and possible jail time, plus any civil filings the tattooed person decided to pursue. The only reason they likely got away with it is the tattooed person was too stupid (I mean after saying they weren't paying and getting the tattoo is pretty dumb) and possibly humiliated to go that route. One possibility is they did go after the artist, but we didn't hear THAT part of the story.
Okay Scott definitely doesn't deserve for a business which I find it funny the Bobby's business skyrocketed while Scott's died. The lady from the second story is stupid never mess with an artist. Also why did this woman want angel wings if she was the opposite of one.
Fun fact about the last story: tattooing a giant dick onto somebody's back can be seen as assault. So for all perspective purposes, That tattoo artist committed assault against someone which makes him just as bad person they were tattooing.
1st story: man OP is FLUENT in professional “fuck you” language. Amazing
FR 😭
A friend of mine once posted on Fb a post that was telling you how to say some certain things in a very professional language. I thought that they were the most offensive responses you cannot fight back against.
So... She tried to stiff for ink and got a stiff in return.
She tried to stiff him, and he gave her a permanent stiffy right between the wings lol!
Stiffy for a stiffer
You could say he stiffed her back
😂😂😂😂😂
You have won the internet today.
Pretty sure the physical retribution, even in the form of a tattoo, would be considered a criminal act. Legally speaking, the tattoo artist would have zero defense. She’s could also sue for pain and suffering and could easily win. Not sure it really happened. Plus wouldn’t she know something was up when he suddenly started tattooing the middle of her back?
Yes this thank you. I've worked for and around tattoo artists for years and that's not ok. You created a verbal contract with her and you both broke it and your part can't be fixed with some money. She's going to want laser tattoo removal and you'll have to pay for that minus what she owed you. Tit for tat is not smart in this case.
considering it was in the mob controlled vegas and had multiple warrants out for her arrest i doubt she would fil charges. (source: im engaged to op)
@@ravynreimer8987 press x to doubt
@@ravynreimer8987cap
🤓
I'd like to say for that last story, the tattoo artist. Be very careful because people will sue you for that. Do not emulate it please.
The artist probably only did it because he knew for a fact she had no money to sue so they got their pound of flesh instead.
@@acgearsandarms1343, actually the lawyer might agree to pay for lawsuit because this would be an easy win...
@@acgearsandarms1343 It still is very illegal though, she could call the cops to get him arrested
@@urgon6321 I know. I don’t agree with what the tattoo artist did, just trying to understand why.
@@pyro014 I know it is. Not saying I agree because it is very much illegal and shouldn’t be taken as a standard, but I do understand what the artist is getting at.
This is why I never want anything tattooed on my back! even though I'd pay them. I want to be able to see the finished work without a mirror. I've seen some photos of really awful back tats.
This is more of looking into the tattoo artist's previous work. If you're happy with it, then go for it. Just try to avoid going for cheap.
Back tattoos (specially full back tattoos) are super expensive because is SO MUCH area to cover. If you factor the difficulty of the design, and the reputation of the artist it can only get even more expensive. So what people do? They forget this will take at least a year to finish and ball at the high prices for the full product (as an example I'm quoting a floral full back and the prices are running from 6-9k at the moment, we are still working on design but it might get to 10k in the end) and go for a cheap one, a "my friend can do it for 2k" type of deal... And well, they get what they paid for.
@@DarkZoma - yeah, there's good and there's cheap, and ne'er the twain shall meet!
@@BeriaLima - I'd never really gone into the prices and labour involved in a full back tattoo, as it's not something I'm interested in: my tattoos are all private statements and so are where I can see them, and covered by clothing in the normal course of events.
I've seen photos of some absolutely amazing full-back tats, though, and whatever they cost, they were worth it.
That story is just BS when you do that to someone as an tatoo artist you can get sued and maybe end up in prison depending on where you are because you are harming someone. And what would the Tatoo Artist do? Counter sue because she didn`t pay in time for a dick on her back? Bla!
Story 1: And that's why you shouldn't be racist. We live in a time where racism basically should be a thing of the past, yet a lot of people are too stubborn to accept that.
With the mixed, muddled, and beautifully melded racial backgrounds so many of us have - I genuinely don't understand how we're still racist as a cultural.
Right? I never understood how they could be to begin with, but I learned it can be taught as a child which I actually had a few things I thought was right but tbh also seems stupid thinking about it now and I'm glad I learned but my parents and grandparents refuse. My dad thinks that all Mexicans are bad and gonna SA my mom and me. Which if anything hes the kinda person who'd do that
@@Maeve.Kieran.420 It's often taught by life experience. Most people confused by racism grew up away from poverty. If you grew up around trashy people you will find some common factor to generalize them.
Sadly prejudice is human nature. While it is something the world will be better without, I fear it will always exist in some form. Even the most open minded person will find their mind hit by prejudiced thoughts from time to time, even if they do not act on them.
@@Kiefsti we're not racist as a culture. There's racist people, but it's not that spread out.
Even if it was illegal and Scott took them to court and won, I think it would've been a pyrrhic victory. Because OP would've at some point tell them that it was because of racism that they what they did and they probably would had evidence for it too. So Scott's reputation would've been ruined from it.
In principle, you should be right, but in practice, the opposite is true.
It doesn't matter if it's "illegal" or not, it's civil litigation, not a criminal case. And over 90% of civil suits settle out of court, and typically with a mutual non-disclosure agreement, so nobody's reputation would be hurt because nobody outside the involved parties would ever know. And if it ever did get leaked by OP's company, not only would they be liable for breaching the non-disclosure agreement (and probably their original contracted terms that usually have a clause to ensure such discretion), but also, it would hurt their reputation more if prospective clients found out they were not being discreet about their dealings with other members of their clientele. Would you hire a company that bad-mouthed its clients? Of course not. So nobody will ever know.
Beyond that, the court doesn't care if "Scott" was a racist. That's not the issue at hand. It's a simple matter of whether OP's company fulfilled its end of the contract for lead generation. So it would never be proven (or even mentioned) that Scott has a racial bias in taking contracts. That's speculative, with no proof, and is immaterial to the case, even if a review of the evidence makes it obvious. It's still not the point of any potential litigation. Just mentioning it would piss off a judge because they'd be wasting the court's time with irrelevant arguments. If OP said that publically, they and/or their company would be open to lawsuits for slander and/or libel.
But then, this was never going to court, lol. Not a chance. Nothing was ever even going to be filed. Putting aside the fact that Scott's primary complaint was that he lost his discount (which isn't something you can really sue for, there are no damages to recover so he doesn't have a case at all), there is still one other glaring issue with Scott's statement...
Every single person who has ever uttered the phrase "I'm going to call my lawyer" as an ultimatum
A) Doesn't have a lawyer.
B) Doesn't have a case.
C) Doesn't know the first thing about how civil litigation works.
D) Will never find an attorney willing to work with a pompous know-it-all, jackass of a client.
This is a universal truth. When someone threatens you with a call to their
lawyer, it means they're vulnerable, you hold all the cards, and you
should immediately pounce on them. That statement is an admission of
defeat for people who are too stupid and stubborn to vocalize an actual
concession. That statement has never intimidated anyone with an IQ above
the ambient room temperature. It's just the last spiteful cry of
someone who's about to run out of the room in tears, with their hands
covering their genitals, who's about to have an emotional breakdown because they lost.
You know how slurred or incoherent speech is viewed as an early warning sign that someone is having a stroke? Similarly "I'm going to call my lawyer" is likewise just a precursor to a grown-up temper tantrum, lol.
"I'm going to call my lawyer" should be music to your ears... it means you've already won.
You will not actually hear from their lawyer. On the extremely remote possibility that they
do seek legal consultation, as soon as they explain their complaint, the
lawyer will nope-the-fuck-out. If they actually had a case, they'd have
argued the merits with you instead of resorting to empty threats. These are words never spoken by people who mean it.
This is doubly true if you are threatening a business, to which you are a
client. They know their business better than you. It's a safe assumption
that people in the business have structured their contracts
and policies in such a way as to limit their liability because they
actually want to stay in business. Most of the time, they will be
operating within those parameters. And if they're not, there's no need
to make such threats.
In the real world, you don't tip your hand. If you have a lawyer and you are intent on having them file a lawsuit, you don't warn the person you're going to sue and give them a
chance to cover their ass, lol. Like on TV, one spouse always says to the other, very dramatically "I want a divorce"... in the real world, only idiots say that. That's essentially saying "Hey, cash out all the bank accounts quick so you don't have to share it with me", lol. You don't warn people of impending legal action. That's like rule #1.
The first time they hear about it should be when they're served with either the lawsuit or a C&D or something of that nature. Even if you are just trying to intimidate
them, those words are only potentially scary in writing, on the
letterhead of an actual law firm, or better, service from the court itself. If you are ever threatened with a lawyer, you can and should call their bluff 100% of the time. You have all the leverage in that scenario, use it.
@@Arkryal too much reading
As much as I love the last story. It is illegal. She could sue. If she isn’t gonna pay he has to take her to court
Yes, I'm pretty sure that's assault. I don't feel too bad for her, but it's absolutely not an acceptable response.
tbh if she wasn't even willing to pay the artist, I highly doubt she'd pony up the cash to pay for a lawyer
@@crispycrunch9971 or the lawyer could just agree to take their fee out of the settlement money
@@Snowshowslow honestly you never should mess with someone that can put something permanent on you. Make stupid choices and win stupid prizes
@@cuernosbeste I mean, of course you shouldn't. But that's like saying: don't taunt a psychopath. Wise advice for sure, but if he then murders you that's still not okay on his part.
Story 2: this is why A: any business owners should ask for a part of the money before they start on something like that so they at least have some cash
second story reminds me of the recent trend of tattoo artists tattooing their signatures on their clients bodies without their consent. both are an easy win in court. like yeah, it sucks that she didnt pay but that would have been solvable in small claims. there is absolutely no need to bodily harm someone just bc theyre a jackass to you.
Or the surgeon who branded his name on patients internal organs
@@Lilith-Rose what!?
@@Lilith-Rose whatever happened to that guy?
@@velvetdarksoul8741 Apparently, his name is Simon Bramhall and he lost his medical license after that. Way to throw a career away.
@@miguelruiz4613 he is an "author" now, novels are based on his mispractice.
Story 2: Regardless if she can pay or not you have to go through legal services tattooing ANYTHING on somebody without their permission from a signature hidden in the work or an image they didn't request is illegal on multiple levels ranging from simple tattoo negligence to full blown assault, which can result in a hefty lawsuit as well as losing your license to tattoo. The 'victim' even if she didn't pay would walk away with vastly more money than the tattoo would cost and the artist would be paying for it. The artist in the story only got away with it because the customer wasn't very smart clearly.
I figured in this scenario, you wouldn't really want to go to a cop and say 'well I scammed him out of 10k worth of cash so he tattooed a dick between the art i stole.'
Story 2: Don't stiff ANYONE, really. A lot of people can screw with you if you're not gonna pay them.
Like an IT person.
It's especially stupid, when you're trying to mess with a specialist. There was one guy, who pissed off his car mechanic so much, the mechanic put few frozen fishes under the back seat in his car...
Hehe. Stiff
@@urgon6321 That might be funny for a little bit but if that ruined some expensive stuff, well it won't be funny much longer if the affected can prove the mechanic did it. Considering we potentially know about it, means the mechanic blabbed about it a lot. Not a good idea.
@@jboy804, usually under the back seat there is only car floor. We once had to remove it from our family car and we found there some rusted watched that were smuggled in 1980's, probably from West Germany. More modern cars, especially high-end ones could hide there quite a bit of mechanical and electrical components, like heaters, seat articulation and adjustment mechanisms, etc. I assume a good mechanic would know, what to avoid.
Besides, potential damage must be above certain monetary value for police to investigate, and either prosecution or judge can dismiss the case anyway...
1) Never mess with the Business Consultant
2) Never mess with the IT Guy/Lady
3) Never mess with any laws, especially tree laws.
Scott messed with 2 out of the 3: IT Lady and Business Consultant
Wonder what happened to the tattoo artist...An Austrian tattoo artist did something similar and put a 16inch dong on a guy, got charged for causing bodily harm and got 3.5 years in jail.
yeah, thats why what the artist did is so stupid and that story should not be pro-revenge, but the setup for a pro-revenge. yeah the chick was a greedy asshole, but dude, come on, thats not how you get revenge.
As "justified" as it might have seemed at the time permanently disfiguring someone over a few thousand dollars is just not right... ever... There are ways to get his money if he wanted but she has no way to fix what he did... (at least not without more time and money she obviously doesn't have...) She 100% was in the wrong for nonpayment but this is defiantly one of those "two wrongs don't make a right" situations. Plus, even without court involvement, dude is wrecking his and the shops reputation on this stupid act. There is no way she didn't blast them online for this and, even with the fact of nonpayment, people will still see how unprofessional they acted overall.
@@SailorMya i sure would not patron their shop after hearing this story. it was a very dumbass move
the worst part about the racist is that he seemed to leave money on the table so he wouldn't work with or for black people and then seemed to be surprised why he wasn't making money.
racism is illogical like that
The complexities of the human mind will never cease to amaze me.
The second worst part about the racist is that he left money on the table.
The worst part was the racism. 😉
This guy does prove one thing to me. There's a sliding scale of racism, and this is probably the most extreme you can go without blood and violence.
I've seen a genuinely racist guy hiring and working for POC individuals, but talking behind their back about their performance/homes/etc while being much more lenient on his white workers, who fall asleep on the job (they work in a landscaping-adjacent field) or actually steal from him/threaten his life.
Why's she so upset?
She got a multi-thousand dollar tattoo for free.
It just has a saluting phallus up her spine, with wings coming off it.
...
...
LOL
Moral of the story: provide homemade pies for a sweeter deal. :)
Story 2: I would NEVER suggest doing this in retribution. It's could result in criminal and civil penalties (as well as being psycho).
You can be heavily sued and even potentially go to jail for this. Yes, it is technically theft from the affected person, but if you ever got that in front of a jury that would be very bad. That was literally semi-permanent retribution easily shown in court (that the tattoo artist definitely didn't get informed consent to perform). That's why I said possible criminal, but likely just heavily civil. Yes the tattoo artist can asked to be paid, but the amount the affected can ask for both the pain and suffering and the removal cost is going to trump that in spades.
What do you do instead? Just don't finish it psycho and go to collections agency.
That's what I thought. It's also sad some comments say good on the artist even though it's illegal. Couldn't he just called the cops on the girl to force her to pay instead of getting himself in legal problems?
@@stormshadow2838 It's not only illegal, but it's quite immoral to assault someone for non-payment (immoral and non-legal don't always line up). Cops won't do much for non-payment for a continual service. They'll likely refer it to civil court (AKA small claims), as debtor's jail is suppose to not be thing now (although there is an indirect debtor's jail with government based fines but that's another discussion).
EDIT: There is a thing called theft of services which could be used to charge the patron (which I'm going to refer to as debtor's prison 2.0), but the tattoo artist will almost certainly either never see the money then or not for a LONG time. If the patron claims non-payment is due to dissatisfaction, they likely wipe their hands of it and tell them to go to civil court (assuming the patron was smart enough to do this). They could never literally force the patron to pay, maybe try to convince them to at best.
The tatooer would be charged with aggravated assault which is a felony. Ridiculous story. Physically mutilating someone over money they owe you is mafia territory.
Happy Sunday rSlash fam! Stay warm, stay cool, stay awesome! 💕
Thanks! Enjoy yours too
@@ahmadu5754 Thanks!! 🧡
You too person! 💖
@@RorThor Thanks much! 💙
❤️omg yes I needed this!
That last story is really bad on the tattoo artist. The customer can sue because that's not how you handle that situation. If my tattoo artist did that, I would just expect them to sue or ask for payment, stopping the tattoo. That artist should have known better. Non-payment is bad, but that revenge on her?
I totally agree. As horrible as the customer is the artist is now worse than the customer.
Yeah that would've been an open and shut case against the tattoo artist that would've probably not only cost him his license, but required that he pay the cost of having it removed. It'd be right up there with an electrician realizing he's not going to get paid, so he intentionally miswires the house. He'd be 100% liable for any damage that happens as a result.
She's a douch. The artist wasn't a complete stranger so it was probably not just the non payment. The non payment was probably an opportunity for revenge
@@amberlindsey7112 abusive people are always worse
What I've learned from the second story is this: don't stiff your tattoo artist or they'll "stiff" you back hard. 😂
And then you'll stiff them back even harder by murdering their business and their ability to ever do business ever again.
Except what the artist did is regret dangerous, like in the realm of being sued into the ground dangerous. Doesn’t matter if she had the money or not. What he should have done is just turned her away, instead he basically committed a form of “assault” that a lawyer could definitely argue and spin to make him pay out the nose for. There are tons of stories of tattooists getting sued over bad tattoos what do you think would happen over something like this that’s more deliberate and malicious.
@@icelord7 Yeah, as soon as she said she wasn't going to pay him, he should have stopped working on her. Maybe after getting in writing.
They'll "stiff" your back hard
As a contractor wanting to open my own business hearing the first story was as enjoyable as it was informative
On the porting numbers question. I worked for a company that managed call centers all over the US and Canada, and we had in our contract that any numbers we managed for the client had so many days more than 30 in OP case that we would hold onto them for. Most of the time it would go like this. We would forward the number to them, and they were expected to request the number to be moved to their account at the phone company. If they needed help doing it, we would help, but we couldn't do it for them as it was their account it was moving to. After the contracted time, if they hadn't moved the number, it was up to us was we did with the number. However, it was a manual process, so we had many accounts where their number was forwarded for years, and we never caught it.
That the fun began. We were moving to an entirely new phone switch. All numbers had to be ported, and all accounts had to be setup. We used the billing system for the process, and any numbers we didn't have in the billing system we simply parked. Think pointing the number at a generic message that the number wasn't active. All of a sudden, a ton of clients phone numbers stopped working for them, and they had to track down what was going on. We had a lot of returning clients that month :)
Tattoo story: I've heard stories of people trying to stiff tattoo artist, as a reminder for history tattoo parlours use to be extremely dangerous the kind you'd never walk into. Tattoo parlours are the place to shake you down and carry bat's behind the counter, these are people who can happily give you ink but are usually the kind who've got some heavy pasts so don't fuck around.
Not a bat 🔫🔫🔫🔫 my artist was strapped.
Should've just left it incompleted. Tattooing something like that on her gives her grounds to take him to court, and she would absolutely win.
Wait- did TH-cam delete my comment or am I just crazy and clicked on the wrong one lol
But either way I agree with you
I said in the previous comment that I believed it was creepy for a man to tattoo that on a woman, but looking through the comments again, it seems that the artist was a woman. My bad, still doesn't change anything, I still think it's weird to leave a tattoo of a nature like that without consent, no matter the circumstances.
Bobby sounds just like the competitor, that Scott was losing his businesses to
For the last story, I wouldn’t be surprised if what the tattoo artist did would be considered assault or something similar. The woman can’t do anything about it without getting herself in legal trouble but there still playing with fire.
(Edit: typo)
There wouldn't be any legal trouble from not having paid.
If she hasn't paid then you simply refuse to continue until she does or take her to court for that. What they say was done is outright a crime that could absolutely get their business shut down though.
Not that it matters because it's so blatantly nonsense it's obviously made up.
Only a seriously brain damaged person would think there isn't going to be a pro bono legal boning coming their way regardless of the money status of the client if they did that.
And even if they counter sue at that point it would just be deducted from the business shattering payout.
@@RunicSigils Like one comment on here said, if the lady can't cough up money for a tattoo, she does NOT have the money for a lawyer. Though, I'm not saying that I fully agree with what happened. I would've just refused to finish :)
Good luck explaining why parts of your wings aren't finished.
@@CawfeeTheShiba some comment said that a lawyer might shoulder everything if it sees that it's an ez win to increase its kda ratio lmao
@@CawfeeTheShiba it would be taken on contingency.
The lawyer would pay all the filing costs for a % of the final payout.
So... pro revenge... or more likely lawsuit revenge.
Cause that last story does NOT reflect well on the artist at all.
yeah, i would not go to that artist for a tattoo and i'm gonna warn off everyone i know who wants a tattoo from that guy. thats just wrong on so many levels
No, its not illegal. ive worked with several phone service providers. Technically speaking those CTN's are "bought" and will be used as asset by your company. It is by your prerogative as company how to use it as per contract with customers. once your contract ended with your customers and as per your policy, you can port the number to the customer or use it again as company asset.
"A protected class"? Here I thought SCOTUS said owners of a business can choose who they serve or not serve in more than 6 different cases.
S2: why would you do any work without a deposit? Refuse to continue until she coughs up the cash.
How did that tattoo artist not get sued into oblivion?
last story is nuclear revenge since it's illegal. artist should've just sued and not finished. now he's probably being sued, and sure maybe nothin will come of it but it's still a hassle on top of fees for lawyers.
Why on earth would you ever get a service without having the money, I think that is dumb, but then again tattoo parlours attract a small population of people who think art should not be paid for. IDK, As an tattoo artist, can’t you ask for some sort of payment upfront, especially on a piece that’s going to cost the artist many hours and ink? Putting money on the table tells you if the customer is actually serious or just talk.
all artists, no matter the medium, should ask for half the payment upfront. its just good business.
I ask for half the payment up front and half when I'm completed *and* they're satisfied (I'll make reasonable adjustments and improvements if they want to fix or change anything once they've seen it completed); good customer service gets tips and loyal clients.
She gave the tattoo artist the shaft, so the artist gave her one in return
Have a great Sunday rslash and thanks for uploading daily
Story 1 the legality there is definitely questionable. Telecom providers cannot reassign a phone number for at least 45 days after it goes out of service. Now this guy didn't work for a telecom provider, but I'm pretty sure the same FCC regulations apply there too, since it was effectively some guy's business number.
That last story is highly illegal. She could have had his business shut down. If he wanted to take her to court, ok. But I don't agree with the tattoo artist's decision to mark her permanently with something offensive like that. I kind of don't believe it, tbh
14:15 no rslash. she said scott owned them. she had the codes to switch them to whom ever's account she wanted to. she was technically supposed to just let the numbers die and other people would get that number from whoever scott's phone provider was.
Your smarmy tone when reading the mocking parts, it is just priceless 😂
Lmfao an ad for tattoo school right before this? Gold
That tatoo story even if she stiffed him. She can still sue and win for few 100k. Happened in FL.
That tattoo story is such an old wives tale.
Well, tbf, it was YOUR number to port after he basically said "f off!"
0:14
I'm just going to assume it's Texas.
its always texas
Anything extra? Bobby, an extra pie would be amazing right about now~
Bow chicka wow wow
It takes an extra level of stupid to screw over your tattoo artist, especially when they're in the middle of doing a piece in a place that you can't see while being tattooed.
The last story was way out of line. Three artist should have stopped the tattoo and sued her for non payment, not permanently change her skin against her consent. Now THE CUSTOMER has a lawsuit instead of the artist
yeah, i thought that was a really stupid thing to do too. i get greedy assholes that refuse to pay for services, but what that artist did was even worse imo
She didnt pay nor had the intention to. She is not a costumer
@@pazvega5895 It is still very illegal for the artist to do that
@@pazvega5895 That doesn't give the artist the right to permanently disfigure her. This isn't revenge, it's just a straight-up, preplanned crime on the artists part.
@@pazvega5895
Pretty sure this is assault
How are you doin rSlash. I hope you've had a good cup of coffee this morning.
Not to be a killjoy but putting a tattoo on someone that they didn't consent to actually counts as assault.
last story, the tattoo artist is in the wrong no matter what. It is ILLEGAL to do that NO MATTER WHAT! I seriously hope she sues him or calls the cops on him because that was unprofessional and awful to do that to anyone!
Pretty sure it’s also illegal to not pay for services tendered. And if she has no money to pay him, what makes you think she’ll have the money to sue?
@@Tustin2121 Calling the cops is free mate, but you stop doing the tattoo and sue yourself in small claims court. What he did is bodily mutilation as she did not consent to having a dick up her spine. Also her not paying doesn't mean she is poor, she could have just not wanted to pay a large amount. On top of that, if she did sue, she can make a lot of money of of that AND get a free tattoo removal service
Section 8 is not for poor people. Disabled too.
I hope that everyone is having a good Sunday!
What's the legality on the last story? Providing a tattoo that was unagreed seems legally dubious at best.
Oh, it's quite illegal - not even a gray area. Bodily harm at the least. If that woman sues, she wins.
@@Stinkehund but she ain’t gonna sue lol
@@liviwaslost In the modern day, why wouldn't they? Any lawyer would basically take that on contingency. If there's money to be made, which is certainly the case here, the affected person would win a decent amount.
If on the other hand you mean the affected person is too stupid to ask for charges or get lawyers considering he know the tattoo artist knew of the non-payment BEFORE doing the last step... that's an entirely different question.
@@jboy804 I’m just saying that lady is too ignorant too sue. I’m not saying it’s not possible though.
Assault and battery charges, loss of all tattooing licences and heavy victim compensation
The "tattoo artist" in the last story actually commited grievous bodily harm, at least in German law. My wife is a tattoo artist and it literally does not matter if she payed or not, if the artist does not tattoo what was agreed upon, he/she/itdoesn'tmatter can be sued to bankruptcy even here in Germany.
This behaviour should not be condoned or even praised.
finally another good video from my favorite TH-camr :D
I like watching these when I'm doing my homework
- a person from the Czech republic
Holy cow Dabney youre almost at 2 mil subs congrats!!!!!!
That first story was some good revenge
Rslash I think you can add a new profession to your call:
DO NOT MESS WITH IT OR THE TATTAO ARTIST
🤣🤣🤣
That tattoo artist deserves jail time. Yes, he has the right to be paid for his work, but there's a system for that. Small claims court. Instead he branded someone.
Never piss of your tattoo artist, hairstylist, or anyone who can change your appear like that
In Germany tatooing a person with an image that was not part of the contract is body harming and illegal. you have to pay the removing, you have to pay a hugh fine for body harming, you have to pay for emotional damages. And perhaps they will close your business. And you will get no dime, even if you can proofe that she tried to betray you.
Well, personally I think permanently (or mostly permanently as there is tattoo removal) marking someone with an image they didn’t consent to it crossing some kind of line, but am also reveling in her getting what she had coming, especially after being stupid enough to let the artist do the work after letting him know of her intentions to stiff him. (Pun intended)
Porting the tracked numbers to the new customer would be intentional interference with contractual relations. Your contract with Company A allows you to cancel service if you don't get paid. It doesn't allow you to direct Company A's customers to Company B, especially if Company B pays you a commission. Also, OP's contract with Company A almost certainly bars them from using customer info to help a competitor, especially if that competitor is paying them 40% extra.
I hope that tattoo artist doesn't have to pay the full price for her tattoo removal. That's not legal. I think he should have taken her to court and refused to finish instead of risking his reputation and legal issues. He has zero standing in a court case due to the fact that he broke the verbal contract. Had he not done that she would have to pay him plus the trouble but now he's going to have to deal with that. And honestly that could be a huge issue and cause him to go out of business.
last time I was this early, we had a functional government
what country are you in?
@@frostbite3318 the UK
@@Forest_Fifer my condolences
As an American, I feel you.
mood
Your company promised a service to two different customers when one of the customers didn't uphold their end of the contract but you still had all those customers second hand through that person you helped those customers get the service they need it there is nothing wrong with that.
Last one is going to far in my opinion. Just sue her for the service man.
Absolutely illegal for that tattoo artist to do that. You take the loss and not waste any more product! I'd not be surprised if he got into legal trouble for that.
Really weird bot ^
These are y I subscribed to this channel
dabney, i just discovered ur 2nd channel (for the past few days) and i loved it. it made me sad when i saw the last vid :( come back when u have time, please.
it's very entertaining and funny, i watch it while eating haha
Story 1 : literally is " don't be an a hole or everyone you're an a hole to will turn around and F U..
I'm happy for Bobby. :)
Hope everyone has a good day today😊💕💕
I’ve seen so many of your videos in the last few months TH-cam only recommends the new ones
Im just imagining her going to get laser tattoo removal and having to explain that one... It cost more then a tattoo and you can't skip on the payments.
Don't tell Scotty. Scott doesn't know
People get mad at him for tatting her like that, but this is what you get when you're paid in exposure
Why the hell would anyone tell a tattoo artist that they weren't paying for the work, while under the needle?.. .this should be in the best of Kevina category
I am so glad that rSlash did not start with "Op Tattoos a giant COCK on a thief" because I was still at max volume
Someone really said last time they were early they still had a functioning government 💀
A big purple Barney the dinosaur aubergine 😆 lol
I've heard that back way in the day someone was doing this transferring the number of one business to a similar business so the business owners created an automated telephone exchange so the person transferring numbers would lose her job.
They invented the automatic telephone exchange and destroyed the operator industry.
I half remember that
Yes she stole a couple hours of work and a couple hundred dollars he committed a felony. She is going to own his business by the time she is done with him in court doesn't matter if she was originally going to steal from him. What he did was equivalent to going out and beating someone down because they owe you money
yikes on that second story. pretty sure that constitutes assault and she could sue.
Grinning ear to ear with that last story with the tattoo artist. Ha ha! Much like not messing with certain groups, i.e. IT, veterans, farmers, etc, looks like tattoo artists can slot right on in.
Me coming up with joke: It looks like the Karen and the tattoo artist both got stiffed.
@@thenoob331 😂😂😂
What the ad OP did wasn't legal, but it wasn't illegal either. Scott waved his rights to those numbers and so it was the company's will to do with them as they pleased. At worst the OP would be in trouble with the company for an unauthorized addition of CTNs on a customer's account, but I'm sure they would overlook that after seeing the 40% sales increase from said customer.
However, what the tattoo artist did absolutely is illegal and frankly I hate them for it. Tattoos are permanent, especially in the era that artist was in, so to permanently fk up the girl's back like that on purpose is absolutely grounds for a lawsuit. Nonpaying b or not, that just isn't acceptable l.
“Stiff” lol
Don't *stiff* your tattoo artists,,, well played OP
Tattooing someone with something they don't want is disgusting a f**k, not to mention illegal as fuck and is classed as assault. Ruining someone's body for the rest of their lives over a few hundred dollars is not ok.
Don’t stiff your tattooist or they may give you a standing soldier in turn lol
Have a wonderful day everybody reading this❤
Wait wait, discrimination against a protected class is a crime? Does it mean that discrimination against a ‘non protected’ class is not a crime???
I’m getting my first ever tattoo on Christmas this year and I’m way too scared something like that’ll happen to me when I go. I guess I’m more scared the tattoo artist isn’t LGBT friendly even tho the tattoo shop says they are 😓
Most tattoo artists will be. I have gotten nearly a dozen all different artists and every parlor has had pride flags
Don't hate me for saying this lol but!..... As wrong as it is for the person to not pay for the tattoo....I feel the artist should have just stopped right there. Not done any more. Taken the person to court. Then make sure to put this person's name out there in the community so nobody will ever finish their work. I just feel this might... Just a little. Be overboard lol.
I only have one tattoo for the fact I can't afford to get more. I know the cost! I would never do something like this but they are also permanent.
Just a little torn on this lol. I think the person deserved but at the same time they didn't.
Your absolutely correct, what the artist did is not only immoral but illegal. The artist ceased to be the victim as soon as she started to tattoo with malicious intent. This is both assault and battery which would likely cost them their license and possible jail time, plus any civil filings the tattooed person decided to pursue. The only reason they likely got away with it is the tattooed person was too stupid (I mean after saying they weren't paying and getting the tattoo is pretty dumb) and possibly humiliated to go that route. One possibility is they did go after the artist, but we didn't hear THAT part of the story.
Okay Scott definitely doesn't deserve for a business which I find it funny the Bobby's business skyrocketed while Scott's died. The lady from the second story is stupid never mess with an artist. Also why did this woman want angel wings if she was the opposite of one.
Fun fact about the last story: tattooing a giant dick onto somebody's back can be seen as assault. So for all perspective purposes, That tattoo artist committed assault against someone which makes him just as bad person they were tattooing.
Never have I clicked on this so fast-
Choosing beggar meets Prorevenge.
Has the galaxy always moved, or am I just extremely late to that specific party...?
I'm pretty sure it moves like 75% of the time cause I remember I used to watch it move alot but sometimes I swear it doenst move