Thank you @christian Wagner for this explanation. As a layman untrained in theology this was the first good explanation I've heard. May Almighty God bless you brother.
Scientists have tried to restore the Creed of 325. It turned out that there are no words in it from whom the Holy Spirit comes. Its interesting that the Eastern Orthodoxy is actually the heirs of semi-Arians. The semi-Arians believed that the Father is the only source of the deity of the other two, through Him the semi-Aryans conceived of the unity of God. The Cappadocians took the semi-Arians' terminology and adapted it to the faith of Nicea.
On mark 24:00 onwards, does the Eastern “Orthodox” accept the definition made by Pope Eugene IV concerning “opposition of relation”? The Dimond Brothers claim St. Gregory of Nyssa teaches this in a different way (3rd Homily on the Lord’s Prayer, Migne, Patrologia Graeca, 46:1109A-C.
Yep if your and eastern catholic you can omit saying the filioque as long as you believe the filioque. So profession of faith is ok to omit what you believe, while the west says the filioque. Just like the pope praying with the Jews, yep they will omit the name of Jesus but believe in Jesus. So you want to follow this kind of theology well that up to you. Bit no thanks not interested in the church of constant changed and compromise defendly not Christ's church.
@@DOC_7whats incorrect? The eadtren catholics omit the Filioque, and the popes have prayer meetings with not only heritics but also pagans? This is fact
I agree.
Ahhh old times. Glad you’re Catholic now, brother. Your apologia on the Filioque was very well, even back then.
yet you have a greek orthodox icon as ur profile picture.
idiocy.
Protestant here. This was by far, better than most videos on the Filioque than I’ve heard anyone try to attempt to go into great detail in. God bless
It's the first video on filioque that I was able to watch without falling asleep
I agree!
Thank you @christian Wagner for this explanation. As a layman untrained in theology this was the first good explanation I've heard. May Almighty God bless you brother.
Scientists have tried to restore the Creed of 325. It turned out that there are no words in it from whom the Holy Spirit comes. Its interesting that the Eastern Orthodoxy is actually the heirs of semi-Arians. The semi-Arians believed that the Father is the only source of the deity of the other two, through Him the semi-Aryans conceived of the unity of God. The Cappadocians took the semi-Arians' terminology and adapted it to the faith of Nicea.
I agree
Absolute CHAD
smash the orthodox heretics 💪🏻
On mark 24:00 onwards, does the Eastern “Orthodox” accept the definition made by Pope Eugene IV concerning “opposition of relation”? The Dimond Brothers claim St. Gregory of Nyssa teaches this in a different way (3rd Homily on the Lord’s Prayer, Migne, Patrologia Graeca, 46:1109A-C.
you were this well-read and still an Anglican back then lol
Why do you describe yourself as an Anglican at 22:01. I thought you were a Thomist. What am I missing?
He was an Anglican at the time he’s Catholic now
Knit.....pickin.
Yep if your and eastern catholic you can omit saying the filioque as long as you believe the filioque. So profession of faith is ok to omit what you believe, while the west says the filioque. Just like the pope praying with the Jews, yep they will omit the name of Jesus but believe in Jesus. So you want to follow this kind of theology well that up to you. Bit no thanks not interested in the church of constant changed and compromise defendly not Christ's church.
@@DOC_7whats incorrect? The eadtren catholics omit the Filioque, and the popes have prayer meetings with not only heritics but also pagans? This is fact
Orthodox change too, now you have female deaconesses 🤌 cant wait for the gender neutral orthodox priest
I disagree
I disagree with your disagreement
Ok American convert
I likewise disagree
I agree.
I disagree
I too disagree with your disagreement
I agree.
I agree.
I agree.
I agree.