It's def just your feet. Everyone I know loves the Hovr boots. Super comfortable, no break in time. It's just you, and probably a small minority of other shoppers.
@@jimmylarge1148 some don't really do it at all. Not more than hardtails at least. Like the Collosus and Xquareone bikes from Polygon. Unless you stand up and pedal, there's no pedal bob. I believe the Propain Hugene also can do it, it has almost the same linkage design as the Collosus, just that the top one is flipped If you stand up and pedal, it's due to your weight going up and down.
@@Rose_Butterfly98 I am talking abt standing and cranking for sure. Correct it’s the weight going up and down just like in these boots he’s talking abt. Absorbs your hard work 😂
yeah, no. lol. that is literally not how it works with shoes. that comparision does not even make sense because it is so different from bike suspension and shoes. the foam in shoes are designed to actually provide more energy to your stride without you having to expend more than usual energy from your body. you are not expending excessive energy to walk in these shoes. its just an average stride that you normally have in your walk, but as with the "super shoes" that marathon runners use, the shoe actually boosts you forward.
Seriously these reviews are incredible do I need these shoes or even care? No but the the structure of the video editing and review legit locked me in the whole video
@@jacobrodesh9019 I did 55 miles over 6 days in my Lowa Z-8N GTX C (Sievi Dual Comfort insoles), which are rigid hiking/work boots. Walked in the woods, trails, asphalt. Stepped on rocks and branches, logs, boulder hopping. No tendinitis, no nothing except sore bottoms which you cant avoid on trips that long of course. Stiff heel is no death sentence. Your "low drop ankle shoes" would last one trip like that. Not to mention your trip would be over the minute you step into some sludge or a puddle you didnt see that goes above your ankle. And my boots also work year round, in cold winters and warm summers. For long distance serious hiking off the beaten path, high ankle rigid and durable boots is what you want. The low drop lightweight comfort shoes you mentioned are much better for day trips purely on clean easy trails on sunny days. The kind of "hiking" where you wear shorts.
Best hiking shoes I have ever owned are the Salmons GTX 3s (they come in wide). I have collectively between both pairs put over 1500 miles hiking, shooting, yard work etc
I think with a rocker style shoe with soft foam the only way you could do it effectively for long distances would be with a carbon fiber or proper plastic plate and a insole with built in arch support, Addidas can get away with not doing it because of the rebound of their boost-tech, so it seems like they over-estimated their new foam technology and figured the could cut the same corners as Addidas when they would have been better off spending the little bit more and building them more like a On or a Hoka.
Nice review -- I love how your videos dive into the technical aspects of shoe construction. On the foot mechanics side: If you have strong feet, you don't need arch support -- because arches, by definition, don't need anything under them. Conversely, if you use arch support all the time, the heel and ball of the foot get weaker, just like keeping any other body part in a cast. That said, you're spot on about the toe box; it shouldn't be raised.
I've worn these boots for roughly 60 foot miles per week for about a year. I didn't like the rocking feeling of the rounded edges at first and I would clip my heel against the other foot because of the way the sole bulges out but after a few weeks.I really liked them. They keep my feet super warm in the cold winter, dry walking through streams on hikes and not as hot as my black leather boots in the summer. After a year, I've completely worn through the foam and I'm walking on the fabric bottom of the inside of the boot. I'm going back to solovair. I get at least 3 years out of the boot with 1 or 2 resoles during that time.
I just got back from a black bear hunt in BC. These are my favourite boots too. They fot my foot ao well, lace up great and a super light. My biggest issue was the lack of heel and tread. But i drilled some logging studs to the sole and made them incredible
I don't think I've ever seen someone wearing a pair of Under Armor shoes in the wild. I can't think of a shoe type where Under Armor would pop into my head as a go-to.
Thank you your videos are very helpful. Watching you cut things apart and learning about construction makes me able to make good decisions when I’m looking at buying new shoes or boots. These boots just look uncomfortable no art support. We get more support from a pair of crocs.
I know your scope is generally boots and sneakers on this channel, but Nike is starting to market “air” on some football boots (soccer cleats). I think you should do a video on the Nike mercurial vapor elite model!
I worked in LE for 25 years and bought many pairs of duty boots during that time. I bought one pair of Under Armor boots and they were by far the worst I ever purchased. They were VERY light, but uncomfortable as hell, which isn’t good for working 12 hour+ shifts. I have them a month or so to break in and they only got worse during that time.
Y’all should do the Nike ACG Gaidome Gortex hiking boots. Probably one of the most slept on boot on the market right now. I use it often for my long hikes.
Without a doubt UA are the most comfortable boots I have ever worn. And it's good thing they're cheap because some of my Vasques and Speed Freaks didn't last 6 months.
Glad it's not just me who thinks these are completely useless as a hiking boots! I made the mistake of buying these POS for hunting, and oh boy they sucked, after 4 hours out in the woods my feet and Achilles tendon were so sore I couldn't walk any further. Then I spent the next two days after unable to really walk. If you're walking like 500 yard to a tree stand, and sitting on your arse the whole time yeah they might be comfortable but if you're stalking or doing any kind trailblazing leave these at home!
I would love to see a review and deconstruction of the Nike ACG "GoreTex" Mountain Fly. They are some of my favorite and most comfortable outdoor hiking sneaker/boot (snoot?).
I got a pair of under armor valsetz boots, there very comfortable and flexible. Almost like a stretchy slipper kinda boot, i dont feel like there's a shank at all though..There actually so stretchy i got them a little to small and they stretch and fit like my moccasin slippers.. There nice walking around durring the day to day, but i wouldnt wear them on rocks or for anything i need support for. Seems most or maybe all of there boots are made about the same atleast from what ive seen. But hey if they work they work, everybodys needs and feet are different.
I think you should really change your waterproofing test. It's really easy to make something waterproof when just sitting stil< even fully submerged. Where waterproofing fails is all the creasing points, seams that get pushed around while walking, so really you need movement in your shoe while exposed to water to see how it will do.
As a guy who’s fairly active it blows my mind that we used to workout in cotton and just deal with it. Under armor was such a massive innovation for athletes
I got some goretex lined under armor hiking boots about a decade ago. They were nice to hike in but the goretex never did prevent water from seeping into the boots. My feet would stay dry for about 5 minutes before water started seeping in from the bottom of the boots. I decided to never buy their boots again.
My elderly coworkers like them a lot, but those are people with multiple issues ranging from diabetic foot to arthritis. I tried those on at the store just out of curiosity and it was terrible - as if I was walking on a coarse sand while it was solid concrete floor. In addition, that giant "lip" on the back of the heel didn't allow me to walk with my usual long stride.
Hey Weston! Love the channel! Have you guys ever dissected a Vans shoe before? Specifically the “Skate” or “Pro” series? They’re aimed to be more comfortable and provide more support and cushioning for the skater on the move. They’re said to have a more durable construction than their everyday/regular counterparts. However when you get to the bottom of the sneakers, after removing the insanely thick foam insole, there’s nothing left in the bottom just a fine fabric layer and then rubber sole. No mediating factor other than just the really squishy (I would say too squishy) insoles. After seeing how these under armor hiking boots played out they sort of remind me of what happens in the process of wearing these “pro” or “skate” models of vans. After a while the shoe ends up shaping itself like a banana because there’s nothing there other than the insole. My ankles and arches kill when I wear them and now they stay in my closet. So maybe it’s me? Maybe they’re not as great as they’re marketed to be? Anyway sorry for the book! Thanks for the content!
I had a pair of under armor shoes . I hated them. The side cracked and spit. The soles did start to peel off. I got them in the early 2010s . I never went back. I suppose I could but there are so many to choose from.
These Under Armour boots look like they're going the way of Oakley; a nice series of ideas in the company, but products that lose the fundamentals of meeting the application, success by name and expectation rather than simply delivering.
Seems that the way these support the foot would cause pain in the arch of the foot or in the back of the calf like when riding a bike in shoes without a rigid sole.
I recently got the Gore-Tex ultra boost light shoes and they are amazing especially for the spring and summer and they’re not a boots so they’re gray for hiking. You should check them out because they’re really water proof. I’ve walked in gigantic puddles. I have videos on my page they’re amazing.
Try the fat tire summits with michelin tire rubber theyre a higly versatile shoe for hiking and walking with a ankle liner that zips on and off and the lcing system is also very good😊
I forget the name but I have an old pair of leather hiking boots from them. And the sole has more of an anatomical shape that I really like. The tpu under the midsole is nearly flat from like 6-7 years of use.
It's def just your feet. Everyone I know loves the Hovr boots. Super comfortable, no break in time. It's just you, and probably a small minority of other shoppers.
Don't forget any Oakley boots . The only boot I have hated more than 80's Army boots. The only tight spot on Oakleys is the top of your foot, yet your heel slides and rubs raw.
I bought the original "Project Rock" shoes from Under Armour, years ago. They seemed pretty good. I am not going to say they were awesome quality or that they stood out as particularly good, but I never had any issues with them. Later, I bought the "Version 2" of those shoes. Awful. Just awful. The fit was bad. The shoes were uncomfortable. They broke down unbelievably fast. You know, it's a good thing that I actually paid more for the Version 2, since they raised the price. How dumb would I have felt if I hadn't paid more money for a lower quality product... So anyway... my Vivobarefoot shoes and Redwing boots (two ends of the footwear spectrum) are still going strong with zero issues after years of hard use.
I’m old, olde4 than old school….but a stiff, properly contoured stiff sole is what I want…I want support for m6 foot, let th3 sole& insole have the stiff contoured roll so my midsole isnt flexing. Support, not squish
Have a few with the HOVR midsole which to be honest the feeling on feet is just fairly so-so. First thing I noticed is their sizing is way off (I'm a 9.5 but feels more like a 9.0) and even going to a 10 is still a squeeze. I do like their designs, their quite eye catching and different in a good way.
Exactly my first tought, it has nothing in common with a working boot, almost like a yeezy or other designer fashion piece, just maybe less bizare and more just futuristic...
They basically were, I don't know why you'd pass up brands with decades of experience in hiking footwear for a brand that "innovated" thin polyester clothing and now thinks they can make performance footwear. UA has always been an overpriced rebranding of white label petroleum products at best.
I got a pair of Nike SFB 6s at the beginning of the winter, and I had exactly the same issues! Every review said they were super comfortable, had amazing support, etc. but for me they had none. I found them to be too soft and squishy for boots. If you get a pair in your hands by any chance, give them a try too. I'd be curious to hear your expert perspective on them.
I'm a chef who always wears waterproof ,steel toe,slip resistant boots. I was a Red Wings man until about 3 years ago when I found the timberland pro. Price point like 180. I like them alot but have any suggestions. I'm 42 I'm 58 210.
@TotallyNuss What I'm on the fence about are the Oboz or Merrell. I can't find much legit info. Everything I'm finding are Rah Rah, paid type reviews. Looking for legit insight
I do notice the lack of arch support in the gym shoes too. I won't lie. I do like the gym shoes k use. But I see how the lack of support can be annoying
So I've actually had a couole different pairs of underarmor boots, and I have to say they're really hit or miss. I have a pair of valsetz 6 inch security style boots, and they suck absolute ass. I got a different lair if valsetz mid rise boots last week, and they're SO good.
Is it possible that this would work better as urban footwear, that the rounded squishy design is more comfortable on flat and really hard surfaces? Just a thought, cheers
What shoe you are comparing it. Its like trail running boot for example running in the woods with your dog (yes that is also a hobby). If you are comparing it to running shoes, trail runners are more unstable because of the higher pattern. And boot have bigger logs in the bottom usually so they are more stable. Its very common when the threat wears our from trail runners its alot more stable. And so are slick tires on the track on dry day.
I think you are comparing it to the adidas boost boot. Yes it more stable just by looking at it. Some like that rolling boot type more though. And i think that dual density adds the unstable feeling. But you did not comment like what was the personal feeling just walkin in straight dirt road adidas vs under armour (?) with those rolling shoes you usually walk little bit faster than with more stable shoes.
Well yeah, the more cushion you add the less power is transferred from the foot to the ground. Same reason we use suspension, and why race cars use more hard suspension. Seems like a hiking shoe meant for people who just want to look like they hike.
It’s strange because I’ve a pair of Under Armour HOVR Ridge Trek Trail Running Shoes and I find them not soft enough although I’ll admit I only use them for dog walking also they can be a pig to put on,strange as this sounds,with what type of socks you have on because of the elasticated sock built into these shoes but the vibram soul definitely grips fine
Inbuilt arch support is often really really bad. When you want arch support get a custom made (!) orthopedic insole for your feet. Otherwise it is hit and miss and often does more bad than good. For most things you do not need it if your feet are not damaged in some kind or you have to stand/walk for 12 hours a day. For the video: Really bad shoes like most modern footwear. Furthermore there does not seem to be many decent real hiking boot producers footwear in the US. Here in Germany and Austria we would consider 3/4 of the "hiking" boots tested here sneakers lol
Living in Austria as well - the hiking boots are great here and I honestly would not trust those soles on a steep hike. But I see barefoot-style trail runners that seem fine so what do I know . What is MADDENING about the German, Swiss and Austrian sneaker market is the lack of wide width sneakers. I live in hiking boots mostly because they have to be cut more generously and I find so few sneakers that actually fit my forefoot (and I have no bunions or anything). Sneaker manufacturers that offer over a hundred options in wide women's sneakers in Asia and North America offer only a few options if any on the market here. When I go back to the States I make sure to buy a few pairs because they are almost non-existant here.
I had the earlier fat tires. Low cut trail shoes. As good as I think they are, my sample's overlays eventually delaminated. Not the sole but the uppers gave out 😅
That wasn't a great transition to the promo for the SMUGS. It was too abrupt. I had to rewind because I thought I had skipped to a different video. Hope I can snag a pair though.
I had this version as a tactical boot. Absolutely awful. Felt like I was walking on an unstable pillow. No support, no arch. Like one of those Foam #1 Fingers wrapped around my foot and ankle.
Well just when you think you’re having a bad day, you could be me and purchased these BEFORE watching this video. Can’t WAIT for a 12 hour patrol shift wearing these 🙄 😂
Dude, it would be cool to see you do a review and tear down of good dress shoes I have yet to find one that had good quality leather that was comfortable or you find comfortable but the leather and build quality sucks
Glad someone else had the same opinion, i bought these boots because of people like cam hanes etc who raved about them. I put them on and instantly i knew they were shit. I tried to break them in but they were iust so terrible i couldnt do it.
A rocker is fine - necessary, even - on stiff mountaineering boots with no flex in the soles or ankles, but on a lightweight, flexible “boot”? The rocker and the flex probably fight each other and make your feet work harder.
Not real hiking boots. Probably the reason for it being so uncomfortable is that the lateral rocking is not good for supplination/pronation. This will not be stable.
Just looking at it... My guess it's the sole shaped like a banana that instead of giving you a "flat" support it rocks you back and forth with the banana shape. Yeap, it's also the foam being too soft giving you that flat tire, and quicksand feeling. I have flat feet, and I had a pair of super spongy shoes that just tired me.
Y'all should take apart a Frye boot. I love my 8R but it is noticeably heavier and less breathable than my other heritage boot (iron ranger) - what's going on in there?
Try them on for yourself. I personally love these boots. My only complaint is that the sole has very little grip. I drilled a few studs into the boots and now they are amazing
Sign up for the release of the Rose Anvil x Goral SMUGS releasing on 4/25 here - bit.ly/4d2kKRq
I'll bet they don't come in EEE. 🪦
Why don't you test their best ones first?
It's def just your feet. Everyone I know loves the Hovr boots. Super comfortable, no break in time. It's just you, and probably a small minority of other shoppers.
It’s like a bicycle with full suspension, the shocks while absorbing bumps really well also absorbs a LOT of the power you’re putting into the cranks.
Not if it the linkage geometry was designed properly but yeah.
@@Rose_Butterfly98 all full suspension bikes steal your power. Some more than others tho yes.
@@jimmylarge1148 some don't really do it at all. Not more than hardtails at least.
Like the Collosus and Xquareone bikes from Polygon.
Unless you stand up and pedal, there's no pedal bob. I believe the Propain Hugene also can do it, it has almost the same linkage design as the Collosus, just that the top one is flipped
If you stand up and pedal, it's due to your weight going up and down.
@@Rose_Butterfly98 I am talking abt standing and cranking for sure. Correct it’s the weight going up and down just like in these boots he’s talking abt. Absorbs your hard work 😂
yeah, no. lol. that is literally not how it works with shoes. that comparision does not even make sense because it is so different from bike suspension and shoes. the foam in shoes are designed to actually provide more energy to your stride without you having to expend more than usual energy from your body. you are not expending excessive energy to walk in these shoes. its just an average stride that you normally have in your walk, but as with the "super shoes" that marathon runners use, the shoe actually boosts you forward.
Seriously these reviews are incredible do I need these shoes or even care? No but the the structure of the video editing and review legit locked me in the whole video
Need to see some Merrels on here. Moabs, trail gloves, wilderness boots, vapor gloves, alpine sneakers, hydro mocs, etc....
For any long distance hiking, a stiff heel is a death sentence and a recipe for tendinitis in your Achilles. Low drop ankle shoes are your best bet
Merrel went down hill when they started trusting the dog eating Chicoms to make their products
@@jacobrodesh9019 I did 55 miles over 6 days in my Lowa Z-8N GTX C (Sievi Dual Comfort insoles), which are rigid hiking/work boots. Walked in the woods, trails, asphalt. Stepped on rocks and branches, logs, boulder hopping. No tendinitis, no nothing except sore bottoms which you cant avoid on trips that long of course. Stiff heel is no death sentence. Your "low drop ankle shoes" would last one trip like that. Not to mention your trip would be over the minute you step into some sludge or a puddle you didnt see that goes above your ankle. And my boots also work year round, in cold winters and warm summers.
For long distance serious hiking off the beaten path, high ankle rigid and durable boots is what you want. The low drop lightweight comfort shoes you mentioned are much better for day trips purely on clean easy trails on sunny days. The kind of "hiking" where you wear shorts.
Best hiking shoes I have ever owned are the Salmons GTX 3s (they come in wide). I have collectively between both pairs put over 1500 miles hiking, shooting, yard work etc
I think with a rocker style shoe with soft foam the only way you could do it effectively for long distances would be with a carbon fiber or proper plastic plate and a insole with built in arch support, Addidas can get away with not doing it because of the rebound of their boost-tech, so it seems like they over-estimated their new foam technology and figured the could cut the same corners as Addidas when they would have been better off spending the little bit more and building them more like a On or a Hoka.
Nice review -- I love how your videos dive into the technical aspects of shoe construction.
On the foot mechanics side: If you have strong feet, you don't need arch support -- because arches, by definition, don't need anything under them.
Conversely, if you use arch support all the time, the heel and ball of the foot get weaker, just like keeping any other body part in a cast.
That said, you're spot on about the toe box; it shouldn't be raised.
I've worn these boots for roughly 60 foot miles per week for about a year. I didn't like the rocking feeling of the rounded edges at first and I would clip my heel against the other foot because of the way the sole bulges out but after a few weeks.I really liked them. They keep my feet super warm in the cold winter, dry walking through streams on hikes and not as hot as my black leather boots in the summer.
After a year, I've completely worn through the foam and I'm walking on the fabric bottom of the inside of the boot. I'm going back to solovair. I get at least 3 years out of the boot with 1 or 2 resoles during that time.
Man, I love this boot. I wear them hunting Elk in Colorado and my feet were never an issue.
I just got back from a black bear hunt in BC. These are my favourite boots too. They fot my foot ao well, lace up great and a super light. My biggest issue was the lack of heel and tread. But i drilled some logging studs to the sole and made them incredible
I don't think I've ever seen someone wearing a pair of Under Armor shoes in the wild. I can't think of a shoe type where Under Armor would pop into my head as a go-to.
I found Merrell shoes a few years ago. I know, I’m sorry and old. I love them, most are waterproof and great for hiking!
Thank you your videos are very helpful. Watching you cut things apart and learning about construction makes me able to make good decisions when I’m looking at buying new shoes or boots. These boots just look uncomfortable no art support. We get more support from a pair of crocs.
I have these boots and absolutely LOVE them for whitetail bow hunting. They have held up great and are the most comfy boots I’ve ever owned
I have a pair UK size 11.5. The best and most comfortable i ever worn! Im also flat footed so this helps massivel!
I know your scope is generally boots and sneakers on this channel, but Nike is starting to market “air” on some football boots (soccer cleats). I think you should do a video on the Nike mercurial vapor elite model!
I worked in LE for 25 years and bought many pairs of duty boots during that time. I bought one pair of Under Armor boots and they were by far the worst I ever purchased. They were VERY light, but uncomfortable as hell, which isn’t good for working 12 hour+ shifts. I have them a month or so to break in and they only got worse during that time.
Y’all should do the Nike ACG Gaidome Gortex hiking boots. Probably one of the most slept on boot on the market right now. I use it often for my long hikes.
Without a doubt UA are the most comfortable boots I have ever worn. And it's good thing they're cheap because some of my Vasques and Speed Freaks didn't last 6 months.
Glad it's not just me who thinks these are completely useless as a hiking boots! I made the mistake of buying these POS for hunting, and oh boy they sucked, after 4 hours out in the woods my feet and Achilles tendon were so sore I couldn't walk any further. Then I spent the next two days after unable to really walk. If you're walking like 500 yard to a tree stand, and sitting on your arse the whole time yeah they might be comfortable but if you're stalking or doing any kind trailblazing leave these at home!
can you do mountaineering boots? like scarpa, la sportiva, the kind of boots that are made for crampons.
I would love to see a review and deconstruction of the Nike ACG "GoreTex" Mountain Fly. They are some of my favorite and most comfortable outdoor hiking sneaker/boot (snoot?).
I got a pair of under armor valsetz boots, there very comfortable and flexible.
Almost like a stretchy slipper kinda boot, i dont feel like there's a shank at all though..There actually so stretchy i got them a little to small and they stretch and fit like my moccasin slippers..
There nice walking around durring the day to day, but i wouldnt wear them on rocks or for anything i need support for.
Seems most or maybe all of there boots are made about the same atleast from what ive seen.
But hey if they work they work, everybodys needs and feet are different.
I think you should really change your waterproofing test. It's really easy to make something waterproof when just sitting stil< even fully submerged. Where waterproofing fails is all the creasing points, seams that get pushed around while walking, so really you need movement in your shoe while exposed to water to see how it will do.
Love the channel, one of the best in the business. One of my inspirations and idols when I make my own videos!
A honest review, without bias, go try 'em yourself is the only way to be sure.
I love the UA Jungle Rat boot.
Huge bummer they discontinued them several years ago.
Alpha Wolf, hell yeah
As a guy who’s fairly active it blows my mind that we used to workout in cotton and just deal with it. Under armor was such a massive innovation for athletes
I think the mountain climbing guys had been using those fabrics since the 80s and they just forgot to tell the rest of us 😂
Really hope he does the Nike SFB sometime. One of my favorite.
I got some goretex lined under armor hiking boots about a decade ago. They were nice to hike in but the goretex never did prevent water from seeping into the boots. My feet would stay dry for about 5 minutes before water started seeping in from the bottom of the boots. I decided to never buy their boots again.
My elderly coworkers like them a lot, but those are people with multiple issues ranging from diabetic foot to arthritis. I tried those on at the store just out of curiosity and it was terrible - as if I was walking on a coarse sand while it was solid concrete floor. In addition, that giant "lip" on the back of the heel didn't allow me to walk with my usual long stride.
Hey Weston! Love the channel! Have you guys ever dissected a Vans shoe before? Specifically the “Skate” or “Pro” series? They’re aimed to be more comfortable and provide more support and cushioning for the skater on the move. They’re said to have a more durable construction than their everyday/regular counterparts. However when you get to the bottom of the sneakers, after removing the insanely thick foam insole, there’s nothing left in the bottom just a fine fabric layer and then rubber sole. No mediating factor other than just the really squishy (I would say too squishy) insoles. After seeing how these under armor hiking boots played out they sort of remind me of what happens in the process of wearing these “pro” or “skate” models of vans. After a while the shoe ends up shaping itself like a banana because there’s nothing there other than the insole. My ankles and arches kill when I wear them and now they stay in my closet. So maybe it’s me? Maybe they’re not as great as they’re marketed to be? Anyway sorry for the book! Thanks for the content!
I had a pair of under armor shoes . I hated them. The side cracked and spit. The soles did start to peel off.
I got them in the early 2010s . I never went back.
I suppose I could but there are so many to choose from.
These Under Armour boots look like they're going the way of Oakley; a nice series of ideas in the company, but products that lose the fundamentals of meeting the application, success by name and expectation rather than simply delivering.
Under Armour boots are ok. I’d just buy some Merrells or Lowas or just about any other brand lol
I also saw the under Armour logo on a Crye Precision prototype combat shirt for the US Army, guess there was a short lived collaboration.
Seems that the way these support the foot would cause pain in the arch of the foot or in the back of the calf like when riding a bike in shoes without a rigid sole.
I recently got the Gore-Tex ultra boost light shoes and they are amazing especially for the spring and summer and they’re not a boots so they’re gray for hiking. You should check them out because they’re really water proof. I’ve walked in gigantic puddles. I have videos on my page they’re amazing.
Try the fat tire summits with michelin tire rubber theyre a higly versatile shoe for hiking and walking with a ankle liner that zips on and off and the lcing system is also very good😊
I've had a pair of these for 3 years and have no problem with them. They're starting to leak a little bit but I have skinny feet as well.
I forget the name but I have an old pair of leather hiking boots from them. And the sole has more of an anatomical shape that I really like. The tpu under the midsole is nearly flat from like 6-7 years of use.
Id love it you did La Sportive ULTRA RAPTOR II MID LEATHER WIDE GTX - maybe im biased but ive really loved these boots.
It's def just your feet. Everyone I know loves the Hovr boots. Super comfortable, no break in time. It's just you, and probably a small minority of other shoppers.
Don't forget any Oakley boots . The only boot I have hated more than 80's Army boots. The only tight spot on Oakleys is the top of your foot, yet your heel slides and rubs raw.
I bought the original "Project Rock" shoes from Under Armour, years ago. They seemed pretty good. I am not going to say they were awesome quality or that they stood out as particularly good, but I never had any issues with them. Later, I bought the "Version 2" of those shoes. Awful. Just awful. The fit was bad. The shoes were uncomfortable. They broke down unbelievably fast. You know, it's a good thing that I actually paid more for the Version 2, since they raised the price. How dumb would I have felt if I hadn't paid more money for a lower quality product... So anyway... my Vivobarefoot shoes and Redwing boots (two ends of the footwear spectrum) are still going strong with zero issues after years of hard use.
This was a great review
My pops recently got a pair of their sneakers cuz he's got some callus issues. He's been digging those so this vid is a neat coincidence.
I’m old, olde4 than old school….but a stiff, properly contoured stiff sole is what I want…I want support for m6 foot, let th3 sole& insole have the stiff contoured roll so my midsole isnt flexing. Support, not squish
Love the Alpha Wolf shirt
Have a few with the HOVR midsole which to be honest the feeling on feet is just fairly so-so. First thing I noticed is their sizing is way off (I'm a 9.5 but feels more like a 9.0) and even going to a 10 is still a squeeze. I do like their designs, their quite eye catching and different in a good way.
They look like they were made by incompetent craftsmen who once had a boot described to them but have never actually seen one.
Exactly my first tought, it has nothing in common with a working boot, almost like a yeezy or other designer fashion piece, just maybe less bizare and more just futuristic...
They basically were, I don't know why you'd pass up brands with decades of experience in hiking footwear for a brand that "innovated" thin polyester clothing and now thinks they can make performance footwear. UA has always been an overpriced rebranding of white label petroleum products at best.
@@DuridPid White label of products they made first?
You should do a video on the Jordan 1 Gore-Tex to see if there is any difference in the quality of it and if there is really any major differences.
I got a pair of Nike SFB 6s at the beginning of the winter, and I had exactly the same issues! Every review said they were super comfortable, had amazing support, etc. but for me they had none. I found them to be too soft and squishy for boots. If you get a pair in your hands by any chance, give them a try too. I'd be curious to hear your expert perspective on them.
I think that And1 stuff is what I remember most in high school.
I'm a chef who always wears waterproof ,steel toe,slip resistant boots. I was a Red Wings man until about 3 years ago when I found the timberland pro. Price point like 180. I like them alot but have any suggestions. I'm 42 I'm 58 210.
Would love to see you test Mammut boots! 🦣
Why are no reviews on Oboz? Please do some. I'm on the fence on buying these.
I have a pair Oboz. Great boots. These look and apparently feel like crap. No contest.
@TotallyNuss What I'm on the fence about are the Oboz or Merrell. I can't find much legit info. Everything I'm finding are Rah Rah, paid type reviews. Looking for legit insight
I do notice the lack of arch support in the gym shoes too. I won't lie. I do like the gym shoes k use. But I see how the lack of support can be annoying
So I've actually had a couole different pairs of underarmor boots, and I have to say they're really hit or miss.
I have a pair of valsetz 6 inch security style boots, and they suck absolute ass. I got a different lair if valsetz mid rise boots last week, and they're SO good.
Is it possible that this would work better as urban footwear, that the rounded squishy design is more comfortable on flat and really hard surfaces?
Just a thought, cheers
What shoe you are comparing it. Its like trail running boot for example running in the woods with your dog (yes that is also a hobby). If you are comparing it to running shoes, trail runners are more unstable because of the higher pattern. And boot have bigger logs in the bottom usually so they are more stable. Its very common when the threat wears our from trail runners its alot more stable. And so are slick tires on the track on dry day.
I think you are comparing it to the adidas boost boot. Yes it more stable just by looking at it. Some like that rolling boot type more though. And i think that dual density adds the unstable feeling. But you did not comment like what was the personal feeling just walkin in straight dirt road adidas vs under armour (?) with those rolling shoes you usually walk little bit faster than with more stable shoes.
I've never worn Under Armour. I can't stand their logo for some reason.
It looks especially terrible on shoes. It's just tacked on and not integrated at all. All their shoes look awful.
Same. I think I’ve seen too many people wearing it like it’s part of their personality, and usually it’s a shit personality.
@@TranceFur😅
Guy listens to good music. Knocked loose I've seen and now alpha wolf
Well yeah, the more cushion you add the less power is transferred from the foot to the ground. Same reason we use suspension, and why race cars use more hard suspension. Seems like a hiking shoe meant for people who just want to look like they hike.
It’s strange because I’ve a pair of Under Armour HOVR Ridge Trek Trail Running Shoes and I find them not soft enough although I’ll admit I only use them for dog walking also they can be a pig to put on,strange as this sounds,with what type of socks you have on because of the elasticated sock built into these shoes but the vibram soul definitely grips fine
Inbuilt arch support is often really really bad. When you want arch support get a custom made (!) orthopedic insole for your feet. Otherwise it is hit and miss and often does more bad than good.
For most things you do not need it if your feet are not damaged in some kind or you have to stand/walk for 12 hours a day.
For the video:
Really bad shoes like most modern footwear.
Furthermore there does not seem to be many decent real hiking boot producers footwear in the US. Here in Germany and Austria we would consider 3/4 of the "hiking" boots tested here sneakers lol
Yea, I am surprised boot makers dont go to Germany and pay volks walkers to test their boots. Germans are serious about their walkinh health. 😁
Living in Austria as well - the hiking boots are great here and I honestly would not trust those soles on a steep hike. But I see barefoot-style trail runners that seem fine so what do I know .
What is MADDENING about the German, Swiss and Austrian sneaker market is the lack of wide width sneakers. I live in hiking boots mostly because they have to be cut more generously and I find so few sneakers that actually fit my forefoot (and I have no bunions or anything).
Sneaker manufacturers that offer over a hundred options in wide women's sneakers in Asia and North America offer only a few options if any on the market here. When I go back to the States I make sure to buy a few pairs because they are almost non-existant here.
by the way
thank you for the outstanding reviews
Peter Cannova
Hey @RoseAnvil would you please do some reviews of LALO boots/sneakers? I love their rapid assault boots!
They saved my knees hiking in the Rockies
Can you guys do the APL Nastalgia 87’s next???🙏🙏🙏
We started carrying them at our store, was underwhelmed by the sole and tread pattern, sticking to Salewa
Merrell Moab speed 2?
Tread looks like a Maxxis mountain bike tire.
I had the earlier fat tires. Low cut trail shoes. As good as I think they are, my sample's overlays eventually delaminated. Not the sole but the uppers gave out 😅
The outsole lugs look like a mtb tire tread, but the siping is in the wrong direction and too shallow
That wasn't a great transition to the promo for the SMUGS. It was too abrupt. I had to rewind because I thought I had skipped to a different video. Hope I can snag a pair though.
I had this version as a tactical boot. Absolutely awful. Felt like I was walking on an unstable pillow. No support, no arch. Like one of those Foam #1 Fingers wrapped around my foot and ankle.
Well just when you think you’re having a bad day, you could be me and purchased these BEFORE watching this video. Can’t WAIT for a 12 hour patrol shift wearing these 🙄 😂
Dude, it would be cool to see you do a review and tear down of good dress shoes I have yet to find one that had good quality leather that was comfortable or you find comfortable but the leather and build quality sucks
These companies need to be paying you for all your consultations… ❤
I agree. Tried those in a boa version and they were terrible.
I had a pair of their "tactical" boots like 13yrs ago and felt the exact same way about them. Way too much squish.
I would not buy outdoor boots without defined heel and arc because short skis with studs aren't good for outdoors
Glad someone else had the same opinion, i bought these boots because of people like cam hanes etc who raved about them. I put them on and instantly i knew they were shit. I tried to break them in but they were iust so terrible i couldnt do it.
A rocker is fine - necessary, even - on stiff mountaineering boots with no flex in the soles or ankles, but on a lightweight, flexible “boot”? The rocker and the flex probably fight each other and make your feet work harder.
I swear under Armour didn't come out until 2011
I own these and I love them.
I will add that I dont wear them for hunting though. Casual every day shoe and light hiking only.
Under Armour is under rated.
Review the walmart combat boot line they sell.
This is how I felt in Hoka Cliftons. No arch support at all- too soft
Not real hiking boots.
Probably the reason for it being so uncomfortable is that the lateral rocking is not good for supplination/pronation. This will not be stable.
Love the story!
Just looking at it... My guess it's the sole shaped like a banana that instead of giving you a "flat" support it rocks you back and forth with the banana shape.
Yeap, it's also the foam being too soft giving you that flat tire, and quicksand feeling.
I have flat feet, and I had a pair of super spongy shoes that just tired me.
Hiker, I've come to like the thurogood crosstrex
Y'all should take apart a Frye boot. I love my 8R but it is noticeably heavier and less breathable than my other heritage boot (iron ranger) - what's going on in there?
Damn I wanted to get the under armor tactical boots. I think they look cool. Like brown and camo
Try them on for yourself. I personally love these boots. My only complaint is that the sole has very little grip. I drilled a few studs into the boots and now they are amazing
buddies would hang their cotton t’s after a football game & the next day they would be stiff like carboard and smell like death lol
I wish makers would use way less sole so that its inline with my heel and not an sticking out an inch past it
Dang that insole was like walmart brand level of style.. looks like something i would of found in some 2007 airwalks😅
Next Chicago Bear Hunt you go on alot of my friends are Packer fan They would Love to join you