GROUP MOVIE REACTION to OPPENHEIMER!!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ม.ค. 2024
  • Christopher Nolan is a genius too! Thank you for requesting and voting for us to watch Oppenheimer!
    The Storm Akima Family Reacts and Reviews Movies and Shows requested by our fans. Our viewers enjoy our pure genuine reactions. We laugh, cry and scream together with the occasional air kick, LOL!
    Watch our FULL Length UNCUT Videos here: / stormakima
    REQUEST, VOTE for our next show/movie and find EXCLUSIVE Patreon Videos too!
    Send us mail here:
    Storm Akima
    137 Danbury Road, PMB 305
    New Milford, CT 06776
    Send our reactors a coffee! ko-fi.com/stormakima
    TikTok: / stormakima
    Twitter: / storm_akima
    FaceBook: / stormakima
    Instagram: / stormakima
    Read: THE HUMAN INSIDE by Y.T. CHENG!!
    Paperback: $16.99
    www.amazon.com/dp/B0CM5HJQPY
    Hardcover Edition: $22.99
    www.amazon.com/dp/B0CQG2G3MD
    Ebook: $2.99
    www.amazon.com/dp/B0CM2NW35C
    Want a stuffed crochet character? Commission one through my sister Sue: making.friends.crochet.ct@gmail.com
    This Fair Use Video was edited by: Dawn (Storm)
    Thank you! :)
    #Reaction #Reactions #React #entertainment #review #Oppenheimer #Movie

ความคิดเห็น • 75

  • @RyansChannel0203
    @RyansChannel0203 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +237

    To put it lightly, this is easily the greatest film of 2023.

    • @calebebner2101
      @calebebner2101 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Agreed

    • @T00muchF00Dchannel
      @T00muchF00Dchannel 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Godzilla: Minus One is a VERY close second place.
      Oppenheimer is my favorite film of the year and is in my top 3 films of all time.

    • @agentmilton2283
      @agentmilton2283 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@T00muchF00DchannelHow is it very close? I’m not saying it’s bad movie or trying to instigate an argument I just fail to see how it’s anywhere near the level of Oppenheimer.

    • @bbash578
      @bbash578 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@agentmilton2283 Godzilla is great and is easily a top 5 movie of the year, saying as a non godzilla fan. But I agree Oppenheimer is still better

    • @MATDMixes
      @MATDMixes 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      For me, It's easily the greatest film of all time!

  • @lesgrice4419
    @lesgrice4419 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    The more times I see this movie the more I realise what a magnificent movie it is. Is it entirely factual? No that would be a documentary, but as a means of compressing 20, 30, 40 years of Oppenheimers life and his thoughts, all the emotional subtleties, his desires, his conflicted acheivements and the chain reaction he had on the world its unparalleled, quite wonderful and beautifully terrifying.

    • @pigpiggypigbigpig681
      @pigpiggypigbigpig681 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah me too. It's one of those few films that gets better each time you see it.

  • @danBooth.guitar
    @danBooth.guitar 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    25:47 the irony that Oppenheimer did comeback in the Whitehouse a year later to receive a Medal for Merit from President Truman.

  • @melissapena5001
    @melissapena5001 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    This was the best movie of 2023. So many actors did such perfect performances. Oscar worthy for so many. Each scene told more of the history. I didn't find this boring at all. More on the end of my seat to see what happens next.

  • @arma21regency
    @arma21regency 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    The brilliant Jean Tatlock had depression and was a heavy drinker, so suicide was the narrative put out at the time. The film is heavily based on the book American Prometheus which discusses the possibility of foul play by intelligence agents working for the Manhattan Project, a theory supported by Jeans brother Hugh and this is why a gloved hand appears in the death scene.

    • @Maxime_G
      @Maxime_G 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      In the movie, it's more a symbolic thing. As like "Oppenheimer killed her"

    • @compactreview
      @compactreview 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Maxime_G it's both probably

    • @thewackykid
      @thewackykid 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      1:08:29 ​​@@compactreviewyeah i think it is purposely made to be ambigious that it could have been in oppy's mind or it could have been real... so either can be true and we never get the answer to this...

    • @wisemanofsorts6068
      @wisemanofsorts6068 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, I was looking for this comment. There is some evidence she was killed by the US government because of her communist sympathies and her potentially being a spy. However, this was never confirmed. So the movies shows both a suicide and a murder as either could have happened in reality.

  • @hotsauce69247
    @hotsauce69247 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +60

    1:03:30 The vibrating background was actually a rather simple effect. They took a picture of the background, took a projector and projected that picture, perfectly lined up with the background behind Cillian, then had the projector vibrate.
    Also did the same with the "underwater map". Really neat visuals!

  • @johnstrong4089
    @johnstrong4089 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    I love how they made Harry Truman and James Burns look like total dickheads because they really were

    • @joeyartk
      @joeyartk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      War criminals

    • @natea2247
      @natea2247 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well, from truman's view Oppenheimer was taking the moral authority on this. Truman was disturbed by the bomb's effect and it's also something that was in his conscious but he felt like it had to be done.

    • @johnstrong4089
      @johnstrong4089 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@natea2247 do you think that if FDR lived longer to see the end of the war do you think he would use the atomic bombs?

    • @natea2247
      @natea2247 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@johnstrong4089 No doubt

    • @vashsunglasses
      @vashsunglasses 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So the thing about Truman was that he was a pragmatist. A real salt of the earth type that grew up on a farm. He famously had a plaque on his desk that said, "The Buck Stops Here". He didn't have a lot of patience for artistic intellectual philosopher types like Oppenheimer. Oppie would have gotten along a lot better with FDR because they had similar wealthy intellectual backgrounds.

  • @ackerion2830
    @ackerion2830 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    A masterpiece, saw it in IMAX opening day, was in awe the entire film, but what really got me, what really gave me the chills, was the shot at the end of the entire modern arsenal of atomic/nuclear warheads, It moved me.

    • @PeterDB90
      @PeterDB90 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I had tears in my eyes in that moment, not from sadness, but from sheer awe and terror. Just knowing that so many people in our world and very few very powerful ones have the means to EASILY destroy our earth - I've never felt smaller in my entire life.

    • @nameless-user
      @nameless-user 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I haven’t seen an ending as chilling as that in film. The only ending of any media that comes close is maybe SOMA’s ending; both impress a similar sense of apocalypse into the viewer, albeit in very different ways.

  • @taiwandxt6493
    @taiwandxt6493 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    A sad fact about the movie. So actually the scenes with Einstein did not happen in real life. Christopher Nolan only put Einstein into the movie for two reasons. One is because the general public know Einstein and so he wanted Einstein to be like Oppenheimer's Yoda in the movie. Two, is because indeed Oppenheimer and Einstein knew each other and were friends with each other in real life. All of the scenes with Einstein are made up for the movie except one, that back and fourth between Robert and Albert during the Security Hearings. That conversation happened in real life, as Einstein and Oppenheimer both lived in Princeton, New Jersey at the time, in which Einstein told Oppenheimer to just resign from everything if that was the way that the AEC was going to treat him after all that he has done, or fight if he truly did love his country as he claims. After that conversation, Einstein went to his personal secretary and called Robert a fool for just lying down and martyring himself.
    That conversation took place in late 1954, which is when the Security Hearings took place. Einstein died in early 1955. That conversation was the last Oppenheimer and Einstein ever spoke to each other.

  • @jp3813
    @jp3813 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    33:02 Speaking of that name-drop, another epic historical drama w/ a stacked cast and masterful editing is Oliver Stone's JFK (1991) starring Kevin Costner, Tommy Lee Jones, Gary Oldman, Joe Pesci, Donald Sutherland, John Candy, Kevin Bacon, Michael Rooker, Vincent D'Onofrio, Jack Lemmon, etc...

    • @lestatdelc
      @lestatdelc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      JFK is a great film. Crap history, but brilliant filmmaking.

  • @carlos10571
    @carlos10571 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    There is a possibility that Boris played by Cassey Affleck had Jean unalived, hence the man in the bathroom when she passed away. It's what people suspect happened.

  • @arobles201263ar
    @arobles201263ar 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The ending of just understanding that his creation is literally the creation of human extinction, and not even a though but the understanding that once one person uses it....everyone will which depicts exactly what he sees a burning world of destruction

  • @MuffinMcFluffin
    @MuffinMcFluffin 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Nolan didn't write or direct Man of Steel. He was a producer and I think helped bring the story into place.
    If you have yet to see them, your next two ABSOLUTE MUSTS for Nolan are Memento (arguably his best written work) and The Prestige (arguably his best overall work, minus Oppenheimer).

  • @BPhillips2000
    @BPhillips2000 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    30:40 Emily Blunt deserves an Oscar for her interrogation scene alone.
    I don't know if the Academy would think Best Actress or Best Supporting Actress for her role...but I don't care. It just has to be an Oscar that says "Emily Blunt" & "Oppenheimer" on it...

    • @micahhynson27
      @micahhynson27 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      She's competing in Supporting. She'll get nominated, but won't win.

    • @IamNinjaOfNinja
      @IamNinjaOfNinja 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Her screen time was too little but that scene really was cherry on top with that perfect music. The music clearly had its own soul synced with Kitty, such a powerful written character. Definitely one of the strongest written female character in years, unlike what superhero genre is trying to push what a powerful woman should be.

    • @Kickinthescience
      @Kickinthescience 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@IamNinjaOfNinja Gwen is written well in the Spiderverse movies

  • @rg3388
    @rg3388 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I seem to remember catching a glimpse of Frank Oppenheimer at the Exploratoriun in San Francisco in 1980.

  • @pigpiggypigbigpig681
    @pigpiggypigbigpig681 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I haven't seen you guys in so long! I'm more than happy to see this film along with ye.

  • @iKvetch558
    @iKvetch558 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Fun fact...the plane that dropped the atomic bombs...the B-29...cost even more to develop than the atomic bomb. The Manhattan Project spent about $2 billion...but the B-29 development process spent at least $3 billion to get the plane working well enough to carry the bombs to the targets.
    It is a terrific movie...and there are very few things in it that are not accurate to the real history. I guess the biggest "issue" with it is that it gives the impression that Fuchs was the only spy at Los Alamos...in reality there were at least 3 more Soviet spies at Los Alamos that we know of. You should check out the article on the History versus Hollywood site...it does a good job of briefly describing the things in the movie that are not 100 percent true.

    • @kadabur
      @kadabur 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wooah i didnt know there were more spies, i need to read more on this

    • @iKvetch558
      @iKvetch558 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kadabur Yup...David Greenglass, Theodore Hall, and Oscar Seborer were all at Los Alamos, and we now know they were passing information to the Soviets...and that is just at Los Alamos.

    • @lestatdelc
      @lestatdelc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That oft-touted fire is a little misleading. That "$3 billion" figure is the development AND production of cost for a production run of 3,943 B-29s (out of the 5,092 ordered). The development cost of the initial XB-29, amounted to approximately $9 million by the time this first airplane had its initial test flights.

  • @wesburnett5309
    @wesburnett5309 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is my number one movie of the year

  • @derps0n839
    @derps0n839 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just over a year ago, the DOE officially expunged the records from the hearing where they denied his clearance.

  • @nick-th6bs
    @nick-th6bs 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    you feel that when all the light at tower light up one by one

  • @GaParanormal
    @GaParanormal 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Best movie to come out in 20 years

  • @thewackykid
    @thewackykid 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    recommend to watch chris nolan's memento and the prestige too...

  • @tjjordan4207
    @tjjordan4207 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Watching this in theaters was an amazing experience with the atomic bombing scene alone. I just wish I had gotten to see it in IMAX.

  • @heliotropezzz333
    @heliotropezzz333 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Or the hand in Jean's death scene might also reflect the suspicion that she might have been murdered for security reason.

  • @JohnnyPappas
    @JohnnyPappas 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just a question, why is the channel now called reboot?

  • @Henry-fn1zw
    @Henry-fn1zw 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    they've done other roles than marvel btw

  • @warrenphilbert6856
    @warrenphilbert6856 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ✌️❤️❤️!...

  • @scifijunky1979
    @scifijunky1979 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The bomb was the most underwhelming thing in this film. I understand Nolan wanted to go full practical effects, but I feel he should’ve incorporated some visual effects for the magnitude of the bomb.

    • @glennwelsh9784
      @glennwelsh9784 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      To be fair, the Trinity explosion was quite small in comparison to the atomic explosions that would come later. The fact that the test was performed in the desert plains of Los Alamos with no buildings or structures surrounding it also did it no favors in regards to capturing the scale of the blast. There's also the fact that we've seen other much larger explosions in actual news reels and previous Hollywood movies (Terminator 2's nuclear annihilation of Los Angeles springs to mind) that smaller nuclear blasts like the Trinity test come off feeling underwhelming.

    • @lestatdelc
      @lestatdelc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@glennwelsh9784 - Except we have actual film footage fo the Trinity test at Alamogordo, and I agree with @scifijunky1979's point about the practical effects Nolan used did not do the actual images of the real Trinity test justice. The audio was well done and gave the scene a lot of the cinematic impact it deserved (as well as giving a fairly accurate sense the delay between the sight of the gadget detonating and the sound reaching the observers).

  • @GaParanormal
    @GaParanormal 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    27:59 doesn't this kind of seemed a little familiar? Doesn't this kind of seemed what's happening to Trump right now?...

  • @AchievementAchieved
    @AchievementAchieved 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This movie was okay, kinda boring tbh.

    • @Maxime_G
      @Maxime_G 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      It was great.

    • @bruhmomento6691
      @bruhmomento6691 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      LMAO😂😂😂😂

  • @kwolf2145
    @kwolf2145 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good ladies for reacting to this great film.

  • @lestatdelc
    @lestatdelc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In a sense Oppenheimer was right about the "end of war" (or at least toal war) between super-powers, but Teller and Strauss were right about the need for the development of the H-bomb to bring about MAD (mutually assured destruction) which actually facilitated the end of direct total war. If we only had the atomic weapon arsenals (as opposed to thermonuclear ones) there are credible arguments that they (atomic weapons) would have been used again in war. So it can be credibly argued that Oppenheimer's position on the need to not develop the H-bomb would have likely resulted in war with atomic weapons being used.
    It's also worth remembering that the allies were already wiping out entire cities with conventional incendiary bombings well before the atomic bomb was tested, much less used on Japan. The allies killed far more people in Dresden, Tokyo, Yokohama, etc. than were killed in the combined bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
    That is not to belittle the direct mass deaths caused by those two atomic bomb attacks, much less the horrific deaths from radiation afterwards. But the two atomic bombs in the end killed less Japanese (and Americans) then would have died without their use in the months of continued warfare and invading the Japanese homeland.