As someone who graduated with a major in Economics and has been living with the climate crisis as one of the greatest threats to humanity. These are some of the best lectures I have seen on the topic. Thank you!
She missed one of the most important disproportionalities in carbon emissions. Generational imbalance. The bulk of cumulative atmospheric carbon was from a single generation: the baby boomers in North America and Europe. They not only burned the most carbon, even after being undeniably aware of its impacts, they used their large majorities to build out a culture of dependence on it. As a generation, they enriched themselves through widespread home ownership, car culture and stock ownership. They financialized the economy, and strengthened limited liability. After extracting the benefits of its use, exhausting the accessible supply, denying the effects, and enjoying the profits, baby boomers have disavowed regulation, public programs and international agreements for a sustainable future. Instead, they have levered and commodified everything well into the future, and persist in hoarding all of the wealthy and power refusing to fund mitigation or adaptation. As a generation, they will die without bearing responsibility or sharing cost and their only legacy will be death and destruction.
All true. But that generation were sold the dream of unbridled comfort and prosperity by the same capitalist processes that lead to the industrial revolution and the post war credit revolution. The same growth paradigm persists today and few of us have been able to resist it's effects, and to avoid some degree of complicity. If any form of mitigation now exists it has, I believe, to come from a collective decision - lead and enforced by better governance - to consume far less.
You guys didn’t mention India as one the countries where massive disproportionality in household incomes have contributed to unequal climate emissions.
10:52 I think that this graph, if it was not made this way (it isn't clear on the video) could've be done considering the emissions per capita because the gross emission might be misleading.
For the first time in history, all of humanity is facing a common external enemy. This enemy is the climate. In the face of planetary danger, it is necessary to unite all people for the future of humanity. Because we are people, and we want to live. I invite all caring people to a unique event on May 7. International online forum "Global Crisis. We are People. We Want to Live" is a large-scale and unprecedented event, organized thanks to the independent unification of millions of people from 180 countries on the Creative Society platform.
The Earth is cooler w the atmos/GHGs/albedo not warmer. To perform as advertised the GHGs require "extra" energy upwelling from the surface radiating as a black body. The kinetic heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmos molecules render that scenario impossible. No greenhouse effect, no GHG heating, no man/CO2 driven climate change or Gorebal warming.
@@blindstagehand I was awarded a BSME from CU Boulder in 1978 which I applied for three lucrative decades pumping up my retirement portfolio. You? Discipline and school? When? Here's some more that's over your head. Fact 1: Remove the Earth’s atmosphere or even just the GreenHouse Gases and the Earth becomes much like the Moon, no water vapor or clouds, no ice or snow, no oceans, no vegetation, no 30% albedo becoming a barren rock ball, hot^3 (400 K) on the lit side, cold^3 (100 K) on the dark. At our distance from the Sun space is hot (394 K) not cold (5 K). That’s NOT what the Radiative GreenHouse Effect theory says. EVIDENCE: RGHE theory “288 K w - 255 K w/o = a 33 C colder ice ball Earth” 255 K assumes w/o keeps 30% albedo, an assumption akin to criminal fraud. Nikolov “Airless Celestial Bodies” Kramm “Moon as test bed for Earth” UCLA Diviner lunar mission data Int’l Space Station HVAC design for lit side of 250 F. (ISS web site) Astronaut MMU w/ AC and cool water tubing underwear. (Space Discovery Center) Fact 2: The GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from a surface radiating as a black body. EVIDENCE: According to the K-T atmospheric power flux balance, numerous clones and SURFRAD the GHGs must absorb an “extra” 396/333/63 W/m^2 LWIR energy upwelling from the surface allegedly radiating as a black body. These graphics contain egregious arithmetic and thermodynamic errors. See th-cam.com/video/0Jijw7-YG-U/w-d-xo.html Fact 3: Because of the significant non-radiative, i.e. kinetic, heat transfer processes of the contiguous participating atmospheric molecules the surface cannot upwell “extra” energy as a black body. EVIDENCE: As demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science. For the experimental write up see: principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/ CONCLUSION: No RGHE, no GHG warming, no CAGW or mankind/CO2 driven climate change.
![Planetary Boundaries - [ECO]NOMICS Part 3](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nnEU3RVvsBM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Planetary Boundaries - [ECO]NOMICS Part 3](/img/tr.png)
![The Scope of the Climate Crisis - [ECO]NOMICS Part 1](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/AlFKMIfqaPE/mqdefault.jpg)
I live and breathe economics. I never thought I would be able to learn so much about econ from TH-cam. thankyou INET. you are doing quality work.
😂😂😂😂
As someone who graduated with a major in Economics and has been living with the climate crisis as one of the greatest threats to humanity. These are some of the best lectures I have seen on the topic.
Thank you!
Reported spam
😂😂😂😂
Who is this highly intelligent, accurate, honest, zero in
soeaker? Great!!
So the economics departments in academia largely ignore such an important topics - the climate change. Economy. Scary. Irresponsible.
Such a great presentation...just simple truth.
Not really she does her math homework
She missed one of the most important disproportionalities in carbon emissions. Generational imbalance. The bulk of cumulative atmospheric carbon was from a single generation: the baby boomers in North America and Europe. They not only burned the most carbon, even after being undeniably aware of its impacts, they used their large majorities to build out a culture of dependence on it. As a generation, they enriched themselves through widespread home ownership, car culture and stock ownership. They financialized the economy, and strengthened limited liability. After extracting the benefits of its use, exhausting the accessible supply, denying the effects, and enjoying the profits, baby boomers have disavowed regulation, public programs and international agreements for a sustainable future. Instead, they have levered and commodified everything well into the future, and persist in hoarding all of the wealthy and power refusing to fund mitigation or adaptation. As a generation, they will die without bearing responsibility or sharing cost and their only legacy will be death and destruction.
All true. But that generation were sold the dream of unbridled comfort and prosperity by the same capitalist processes that lead to the industrial revolution and the post war credit revolution. The same growth paradigm persists today and few of us have been able to resist it's effects, and to avoid some degree of complicity. If any form of mitigation now exists it has, I believe, to come from a collective decision - lead and enforced by better governance - to consume far less.
Excellent talk, thank you :-)
For decades the wrong people in the wrong place at the wrong time have led us towards the climate abyss: they know who they are.
You guys didn’t mention India as one the countries where massive disproportionality in household incomes have contributed to unequal climate emissions.
Accumulation of nefarious economic environment influence. Successful influence yes, sustainable unfortunately yes. Mitigable with good planning perhaps.
10:52 I think that this graph, if it was not made this way (it isn't clear on the video) could've be done considering the emissions per capita because the gross emission might be misleading.
Great presentation!
For the first time in history, all of humanity is facing a common external enemy. This enemy is the climate. In the face of planetary danger, it is necessary to unite all people for the future of humanity. Because we are people, and we want to live.
I invite all caring people to a unique event on May 7. International online forum "Global Crisis. We are People. We Want to Live" is a large-scale and unprecedented event, organized thanks to the independent unification of millions of people from 180 countries on the Creative Society platform.
Wrong. For the first time in history, all of humanity has become aware of a common enemy. This enemy are the rich.
"out of a box ideas" - i have one, it's called socialism
The Earth is cooler w the atmos/GHGs/albedo not warmer.
To perform as advertised the GHGs require "extra" energy upwelling from the surface radiating as a black body.
The kinetic heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmos molecules render that scenario impossible.
No greenhouse effect, no GHG heating, no man/CO2 driven climate change or Gorebal warming.
As an Engineer I have no idea what you're talking about ~ smells like horse, no, dog, no, bull shit!
@@blindstagehand
I was awarded a BSME from CU Boulder in 1978 which I applied for three lucrative decades pumping up my retirement portfolio.
You? Discipline and school? When?
Here's some more that's over your head.
Fact 1: Remove the Earth’s atmosphere or even just the GreenHouse Gases and the Earth becomes much like the Moon, no water vapor or clouds, no ice or snow, no oceans, no vegetation, no 30% albedo becoming a barren rock ball, hot^3 (400 K) on the lit side, cold^3 (100 K) on the dark. At our distance from the Sun space is hot (394 K) not cold (5 K).
That’s NOT what the Radiative GreenHouse Effect theory says.
EVIDENCE:
RGHE theory “288 K w - 255 K w/o = a 33 C colder ice ball Earth” 255 K assumes w/o keeps 30% albedo, an assumption akin to criminal fraud.
Nikolov “Airless Celestial Bodies”
Kramm “Moon as test bed for Earth”
UCLA Diviner lunar mission data
Int’l Space Station HVAC design for lit side of 250 F. (ISS web site)
Astronaut MMU w/ AC and cool water tubing underwear. (Space Discovery Center)
Fact 2: The GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from a surface radiating as a black body.
EVIDENCE:
According to the K-T atmospheric power flux balance, numerous clones and SURFRAD the GHGs must absorb an “extra” 396/333/63 W/m^2 LWIR energy upwelling from the surface allegedly radiating as a black body. These graphics contain egregious arithmetic and thermodynamic errors. See th-cam.com/video/0Jijw7-YG-U/w-d-xo.html
Fact 3: Because of the significant non-radiative, i.e. kinetic, heat transfer processes of the contiguous participating atmospheric molecules the surface cannot upwell “extra” energy as a black body.
EVIDENCE:
As demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science.
For the experimental write up see:
principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/
CONCLUSION:
No RGHE, no GHG warming, no CAGW or mankind/CO2 driven climate change.
@@blindstagehand Fascist.
This comment section is laughable