There is no tide on Earth With the exception of Galileo, all scientists throughout history mistakenly believed that tides were caused by the moon's gravity. In fact, tides are an illusion of coastal movement in a flat ocean, caused by the thermal expansion of the Earth's crust caused by moving sunlight. Nothing outside the Earth can touch or move the ocean water. Only moving objects, such as wind, marine life, ships, and the seafloor, can contact and move seawater, creating waves or tides. If, as scientists say, the Moon's gravity creates two bulges of water on the far and near sides of the Earth, and these bulges of water move around the Earth causing tides, then there should be two highest bulges near the equator 12 hours apart moving westward at a speed of 1,000 m/h. Why do tides only occur on the coast and not in the ocean? Why do different coasts experience one, two, or four tides per day, ranging in height from 0 to 50 feet, and moving in different directions at different speeds? To prove that tides are an illusion, we set up a laser beam on a pier at the east end of the Bay of Fundy, pointing it parallel to sea level and toward a target on the west shore. Observations of this target were made at high and low tide. If tides were changes in sea level, the two targets would be the same. Otherwise, tides are an illusion of coastal seafloor moving over a flat ocean due to periodic thermal expansion of the Earth's crust. www.noaa.gov/ocean/fundy-max The article and pictures show that, at the same time, high tides reached 20 feet on the west side of the Bay of Fundy and 50 feet on the east side. This fact proves that tides in the Bay of Fundy are the product of thermal expansion of the Earth's crust. It is clear that during thermal expansion, sea level did not change, but the land on the east side of the Bay of Fundy rose by 50 feet, while the land on the west side of the Bay of Fundy rose by only 20 feet. The diameter of the Earth is 8000 miles. thermal expansion of the crust moves some coasts up and down 50 feet in flat ocean is reasonable.
The tides on shore can be many feet high, but out in the open ocean, the water only rises between 9 to 12 inches max. It is the huge volume of water moving towards shore that makes high tides so high
@Science Revolution So if its cloudy there are no tides? And I didnt realize you could have thermal expansion on only the landmass and somehow not the liquid adjacent to it, thats magical. Also illusion is used incorrectly here, its supposed to be an incorrect interpretation of the senses, however your conclusion is that there is a tangible measurable affect, thats not what an illusion is. Also go to a beach, there will be two tides in 24 hours.
@Science Revolution holy fuck! You are evil! If tides are due to thermal expansion of soil due to the heat of sun then how can you explain tides at night. Water has greater coefficient of thermal expansion that soil. Why did you ignored the expqnsion of water. Sunlight falls directly on the surface of the soil amd water and the heat is transmitted throughout the soil and water by means of conduction. The thermal conductivity of both water and soil is very low. So this cause a slight expqnsion at the surface area not the whole volume. There are many falacitical arguments in your statements. Im not going to response to all. And by the way, Scientific Truth doesn't depend upon the scientists, it depends upon the scientific methodology. And we do not prove by disrespect, we disprove by respect.
Center of gravity between the earth moon system resides inside the earth a thousand miles or so in relation to where the moon is relative to earth . All water and other mass should be attracted to the centre of gravity. No?
Space Time also explained it this way about five years ago, but you did it even better in slightly less time. thanks. amazing how many scientists don't understand tides yet they put videos out their that are false.
@Science Revolution The block function was invented for complete and utter losers like yourself who think themselves clever because they've learned to cut and paste. Bye now. Back to the basement with you.
Omg, thanks man. You have no idea how much you help me with this explanation. I never understand the bulge on the far side, until this day. I'm from Brazil and we speak portuguese, never find nothing like this in our language, so today i decide to research in english and i found this. Anyway, thanks again.
I'm a science teacher and I just found your videos. The animations are superb ! as well as the explanations that go with them. What software do you use to create the animations/simulations? if I may ask ...
@1:30 Just a quick note of clarification: the gravitational force from the moon doesn't lift an object as it is weaker than the Earth's. Even if it was only slightly weaker, it still wouldn't lift anything. The force would be contributing towards cancelling the normal force from the reaction to the Earth's gravitational force, thus objects would just feel lighter. Objects would fall with less acceleration. Objects such as water particles would only rise if the moon's gravitational force was stronger at the Earth's surface. Thanks for your great videos!
@@Higgsinophysics THE THEORETICAL, CLEAR, AND BALANCED MATHEMATICAL PROOF OF THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA OF NECESSITY: E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy! Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Carefully consider what is THE MAN who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=MA ON BALANCE !!! (Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.) Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=MA ON BALANCE !!! ACCORDINGLY, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The sky is blue, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE !!! Carefully consider what is THE EYE. GREAT. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. TIME DILATION ultimately proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Again, gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE !!! Think QUANTUM GRAVITY !!! By Frank DiMeglio
Thank you very much for this nice explanation. This video is for watching many times because of the various subtleties arising as for example the influence of the centrifugal force from a non inertial observer point of view because of an externa field!!!
Thanks. I understand the dynamics of the water being pushed into the bulge zone. But I don't understand the terrestrial tide (which is not the subject of this video)
ohh see, Sorry i misunderstood your question - It's a good question! I haven't looked into that, but I think it's the same answer - water is easily "moved" so it can have a tidal difference of 16 meters some places - but the crust is much more rigid and so the effect is weaker. But I'm not sure
I ,ve seen the description of gravity wells. .& I could not make sense(in my head)of the way they would over lap how the moons gravity well reached across, like some Venn diagram...it was giving me a headache...but...now I get it....than you !
Yes they are, you understand correctly. An upward vertical component of 1/10,000,000th of a g doesn’t have a noticeable effect, when there’s one g pulling downward. But tangential components do accumulate over distance.
How much of the tidal effect is due to the "squeezing" action of the vertical forces, vs. the "stretching " action of the horizontal forces? If the gravitational field was only in the x-direction, how much bulging will we get? The reason I ask this question is that in your example of the black hole tearing apart the person, the image is mostly one dimensional but definitely the tidal effect is there. I imagine 3 masses connected by springs falling vertically in a gravitational field. This is a one dimensional problem. I am not sure if I need a vertical "squeeze" effect to explain the bulges.
the squeeze is 1/2 the amplitude of the stretch, but it acts in 2 transverse dimensions so the total volume change is zero. aka: the tidal tensor is traceless.
The center of mass in the Earth-Moon system, also known as the barycenter, is located within Earth itself. It lies about 4,671 km (2,902 miles) from Earth's center, which is approximately 75% of Earth's radius on the moon side. While it seems like the Moon orbits Earth, both the Earth and Moon actually orbit this common center of mass. However, because the Earth is much more massive than the Moon, the barycenter is located closer to Earth's center, causing the Earth to wobble slightly as it orbits the barycenter. This means that the elliptical path we generally attribute to Earth's orbit around the Sun is actually the orbit of the barycenter of the Earth-Moon system. So you would observe the earth wobble about the barycenter the side opposite the moon is traveling faster around the barycenter and thus it is centrifugal force that is causing the bulge opposite the moon in about the same magnitude as the moon facing side.
Now, now, now...The Earth is more than 50,000 km away from the Moon, and is close to the Sun and the planets. Therefore, the Moon’s terrain cannot be seen with the naked eye like before...The Earth will be lost in the depths of infinite space... This phenomenon confirms my fifth theory (the earth has been lost in the depth of space)... Yousif A Tobiya
Einstein never nearly understood physics/physical experience. The fact that the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution is not some meaningless coincidence. That is OBVIOUS. Here are the facts. WHY AND HOW E=MC2 IS NECESSARILY AND CLEARLY F=MA ON BALANCE: Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. C4 is the proof of the fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. This explains the fourth dimension. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma. ("Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity.) The EARTH/ground AND what is THE SUN are CLEARLY (on balance) E=MC2 AS F=ma. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! (Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.) The sky is blue, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. Great !!! This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! (This ALSO perfectly explains why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution.) It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. INDEED, HALF of the galaxies are "dead" or inert; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !! IMPORTANT !! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Consider the man who is standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Accordingly, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course). Moreover, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out EQUAL AREAS in equal times consistent WITH/AS E=MC2, F=ma, AND what is perpetual motion; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Therefore, it is correct that the planets will (very, very, very slightly) move AWAY (ON BALANCE) from what is THE SUN !! Moreover, I have ALSO CLEARLY explained the cosmological redshift AND the "black holes". GRAVITATIONAL force/energy is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. NOW, ON BALANCE, carefully consider what is THE SUN. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. SO, again, it ALL does CLEARLY make perfect sense; AS BALANCE AND COMPLETENESS go hand in hand. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS clearly F=ma on balance. GREAT !!! By Frank DiMeglio
I like your explanation and you did a great job on the animation. So, the production is really well done. Don’t take this wrong, but you need to enunciate because your words run together.
t seems than that the high tide on the side of the earth opposite the moon would be a bit lower then the high tide on the side of the earth facing the moon is that correct?
You can imagine the earth without water, water balances the shape of the earth, and its revolving or orbiting around its self, and the sun. Ebb and tide are considered as a safety vale for the earth, and its rotation. Earth with water slows its revolving... The water increased because of the melting of ice caps of polars and Himalayas, therefore the force of revolving increases too... NOW:The length of the year now is [ 365 1/4 +_(2 minutes )].... These studies had completed and sent on July 26th 2000... Yousif A Tobiya
One thing I don’t understand...is why the forces are going away from the earth. I understand the gravitational force and the kind of "forward bulge" aka the bulge going towards the moon, by why is it creating an opposite bulge??? I believe because of inertia but I don’t fully understand.
The centre of gravity for both the moon and earth is far away from the centre of earth. While earth circles around the sun it is also circling around the centre of gravity with the moon. That causes centrifugal forces on the far side that cause a high tide on that side. There is no other reason.
WHY AND HOW E=MC2 IS NECESSARILY AND CLEARLY F=MA ON BALANCE: Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. C4 is the proof of the fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. This explains the fourth dimension. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma. ("Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity.) The EARTH/ground AND what is THE SUN are CLEARLY (on balance) E=MC2 AS F=ma. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! (Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.) The sky is blue, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. Great !!! This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! (This ALSO perfectly explains why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution.) It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. INDEED, HALF of the galaxies are "dead" or inert; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !! IMPORTANT !! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Consider the man who is standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Accordingly, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course). Moreover, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out EQUAL AREAS in equal times consistent WITH/AS E=MC2, F=ma, AND what is perpetual motion; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Therefore, it is correct that the planets will (very, very, very slightly) move AWAY (ON BALANCE) from what is THE SUN !! Moreover, I have ALSO CLEARLY explained the cosmological redshift AND the "black holes". GRAVITATIONAL force/energy is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. NOW, ON BALANCE, carefully consider what is THE SUN. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. SO, again, it ALL does CLEARLY make perfect sense; AS BALANCE AND COMPLETENESS go hand in hand. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS clearly F=ma on balance. GREAT !!! By Frank DiMeglio
I’ve realized that just with the title “Tidal Patterns”, its not easy to find they site I mentioned on my previous post. What I had posted on that site was: “Farther parts of the Earth are NOT SUFFICIENTLY attracted by the Moon in order to follow an orbit equal to the one of Earth´s C.M. (if they could move independently from the rest of the planet). Due to that, they try to get a farther orbit. They rest of they planet prevents that, exerting a "moonward" force. And those farther parts exert an opposite reaction force ... All those forces stretch farther solid Earth´s parts, and where water they so called hide tide bulge builds, trying to reach an equilibrium with own Earth´s attraction (not fully achievable due to they daily Earth´s quick rotation, what also is the cause of the some couple of hours gap between high tide meridian and Moon´s actual position). A "mirror" phenomenon happens at closer half of the Earth, because its parts are attracted by the Moon TOO MUCH for the average orbit, they try to get a closer orbit, but the rest of they planet prevents it ... “ And if anybody wants to see more about previous discussion, the link to mentioned TH-cam site is: Tidal Patterns
Abstract : The energy that dominates the earth is very great, some of it is natural, like the heat of the sun and volcanoes, and some of it is human action, by cutting down trees, without replacing them and cultivating in their place... There are five forces that control or dominate the planet... 1- The first theory (horizontal dynamic movement) and its end... The occurrence of storms, rain, floods and snow, at unexpected times and places, is because of the expiration of this theory, which needs to be balanced... 2- The second theory (vertical dynamic movement) and its end... This movement or force controls or dominates the earthquakes, earth cracks, drying up of rivers and lakes, earth openings, mountain collapses, and the emergence of drinking water springs on the ground... It becomes out of control... These phenomena increased due to the end of this theory... The third theory: it is water that rotates the earth... The fourth theory: the Earth's axis of rotation has tilted 2° degrees... The fifth theory: The Earth has a new orbit... These studies had completed and sent on July 26th 2000 YOUSIF A TOBIYA
so what i understand is that the far bulge of water, is because it lags behind? That doesn't make much sense however, as you said, the earth is not moving toward the earth, thus there is no lag
In the last animation: It shows that the tides are steady in these two spots and are not moving. So doesnt this animation shows that the tides are not moving and that there would always be either high or low tide in these specific places?
I think this model only works for a circle, if we think of a sphere then the bulge created by the vectors will be everywhere i.e. 360 degrees. That is why we will think about the centrifugal force formed by the Moon-Earth couple where the barycenter is not in the center of the Earth.
The difference of gravitational force of the moon 384,400km from the earth of 12,740 km in diameter is only 6% difference on opposite sides. This doesn't make the opposite side to have the same tide hight. It has been shown that the rotation of the earth is responsible for the symmetrical tide but no one to this date shown what is exactly the mechanism behind it.
@@mikev4621 the centre of the wobbling rotation is situated on the opposite side of the moon. The centrifugal force pulling the liquid up then is higher on the moon side as the ratio of rotation is longer than the opposite side. This gives totally dissymetrical tides. The problem with these wrong explanations is the use of Newtonia mechanics. In this mechanics, if you are sitting on a chair, you feel your butt smashed because your mass weight is pulled towards the planet with an acceleration of 9.81m/s². In Einstein's mechanics, you are pushed upwards by an ever expanding planet accelerating you 9.81m/s². In such 4 dimensional time space deformation that the true answer can be found.
@@hugueslecorre4893 The centrifugal force isn't "pulling the liquid up" ( your words) - it throws it outwards, away from the planet. Einstein's visions are useful, but the planet is demonstrably NOT "ever expanding" ( your words)
@@mikev4621 I see you understood the centrifugal force pulling up or out of the decentered rotation is towards the moon and not opposite. Read about the falling man of Einstein, he explained that the man is not accelerating towards the planet, it is the planet which is accelerating towards him.
@@hugueslecorre4893 Do you honestly think the earth would go out of its way to meet a man who lost contact with his window washing platform ? Would it go out of its way to intercept birds flying above its surface? Do you know how much energy would be needed to deflect the earth out of its orbital plane to do any of that? What does the earth do when window washers on opposite of the earth fall off their platforms? does it spit apart in order to make Einstein right? Don't take Einstein literally- he meant that it is "as if " the earth was moving upwards, not that it actually is.
Still I don't understand one thing. As I understand the bulge closer to the moon should be bigger than the bulge further away from the moon, because of difference in gravity, yet your animation shows them as they are equal size. Did I miss anything?
This doesn't explain the different timing in tides of close-by areas or the extra long periods of high tide near Vancouver. It also does not explain the very small tides in the tropical area, where the incidence of Moon and Sun are stronger. Just doesn't explain the absence of tides in entire seas, like Baltic, Japan, Black sea, Agean... It doesn't explain tides
@disciplīna-w1i If you check the tides charts for the cities around the Great Lakes You will see how wrong you are. Tides in Toronto in the great lakes are 10 times bigger than any part of the Caribbean, Baltic, sea of Japan, Eastern Mediterranean, Black Sea, Red Sea You should listen to a flat earther named fakeflip. He is the best oceanographer on the Internet. According to him , tides are made by freshwater springs and the level is restablished by Sink holes on the bottom
@@christiaanhuygens6638 A flat earther? I'm gonna take my sources from people who think they are smarter than scientists? Also, lakes aren't affected by tides, please try again.
I still Dont get this, they all say the bulge is already there, if bulge of water is always there how come entire earth is rotating under that bulge without being drowned? Does this also means that all fishes and turtles stays on the same bulge and earth just is sweeping under them. My head is spinning 😅
The Earth and the Moon are orbiting a point called the barycenter, it is the center of mass of both the objects. When this happens, the Earth experiences centripetal force, which causes the same tide effect.
Have you ever considered that it might be earth tides increasing due to a change in gravity at the Earth's core? I believe the oceans are pushed from underneath. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_tide
![fellow fellow - พรุ่งนี้ไม่มีใครรู้ feat. INK WARUNTORN [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QP6JyjYx_W0/mqdefault.jpg)
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 86 | คู่เอก "คมเพชร vs ชาติพยัคฆ์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/m3q_dRYDuU8/mqdefault.jpg)
One of the very very very few correct explanation of Tides. Beautiful animation and great way of teaching!
There is no tide on Earth
With the exception of Galileo, all scientists throughout history mistakenly believed that tides were caused by the moon's gravity.
In fact, tides are an illusion of coastal movement in a flat ocean, caused by the thermal expansion of the Earth's crust caused by moving sunlight.
Nothing outside the Earth can touch or move the ocean water. Only moving objects, such as wind, marine life, ships, and the seafloor, can contact and move seawater, creating waves or tides.
If, as scientists say, the Moon's gravity creates two bulges of water on the far and near sides of the Earth, and these bulges of water move around the Earth causing tides, then there should be two highest bulges near the equator 12 hours apart moving westward at a speed of 1,000 m/h.
Why do tides only occur on the coast and not in the ocean? Why do different coasts experience one, two, or four tides per day, ranging in height from 0 to 50 feet, and moving in different directions at different speeds?
To prove that tides are an illusion, we set up a laser beam on a pier at the east end of the Bay of Fundy, pointing it parallel to sea level and toward a target on the west shore. Observations of this target were made at high and low tide. If tides were changes in sea level, the two targets would be the same. Otherwise, tides are an illusion of coastal seafloor moving over a flat ocean due to periodic thermal expansion of the Earth's crust.
www.noaa.gov/ocean/fundy-max
The article and pictures show that, at the same time, high tides reached 20 feet on the west side of the Bay of Fundy and 50 feet on the east side.
This fact proves that tides in the Bay of Fundy are the product of thermal expansion of the Earth's crust.
It is clear that during thermal expansion, sea level did not change, but the land on the east side of the Bay of Fundy rose by 50 feet, while the land on the west side of the Bay of Fundy rose by only 20 feet.
The diameter of the Earth is 8000 miles. thermal expansion of the crust moves some coasts up and down 50 feet in flat ocean is reasonable.
Not even 2023 yet and already a new video.
I am so proud of you.
Best explanation I have ever seen on this topic.
The tides on shore can be many feet high, but out in the open ocean, the water only rises between 9 to 12 inches max. It is the huge volume of water moving towards shore that makes high tides so high
One of the few CORRECT explanations of tides.
After so much of browsing on the internet for the correct explanation of tidal bulges of the earth this the best explanation. Thank you!
From Brazil: The best explanation video about tides. Thanks!
Thank you this animation was very helpful. This was exactly what I was looking for.
One of the best explanations of tidal forces I have seen - excellent !!
Your ball animation cleared up everything. I was struggling with this for almost a year. Thanks a lot!
@Science Revolution So if its cloudy there are no tides? And I didnt realize you could have thermal expansion on only the landmass and somehow not the liquid adjacent to it, thats magical.
Also illusion is used incorrectly here, its supposed to be an incorrect interpretation of the senses, however your conclusion is that there is a tangible measurable affect, thats not what an illusion is.
Also go to a beach, there will be two tides in 24 hours.
อธิบายเรื่องน้ำขึ้นน้ำลงได้ดีมากๆครับ
ทำให้เข้าใจได้ง่ายในเวลาสั้นๆ
ขอบคุณมาก
This is the best explanation of how tides work that I have seen so far.
Nice animation, nicely explained and most importantly, gave correct explanation.
Thanks. Adding this channel to my collection. ❤️
@Science Revolution holy fuck! You are evil!
If tides are due to thermal expansion of soil due to the heat of sun then how can you explain tides at night.
Water has greater coefficient of thermal expansion that soil. Why did you ignored the expqnsion of water.
Sunlight falls directly on the surface of the soil amd water and the heat is transmitted throughout the soil and water by means of conduction. The thermal conductivity of both water and soil is very low.
So this cause a slight expqnsion at the surface area not the whole volume.
There are many falacitical arguments in your statements. Im not going to response to all.
And by the way, Scientific Truth doesn't depend upon the scientists, it depends upon the scientific methodology.
And we do not prove by disrespect, we disprove by respect.
Center of gravity between the earth moon system resides inside the earth a thousand miles or so in relation to where the moon is relative to earth . All water and other mass should be attracted to the centre of gravity. No?
Finally! An explanation simple enough to understand. Thank you. 😊
Thanks for the info! Loved the video!
Space Time also explained it this way about five years ago, but you did it even better in slightly less time. thanks. amazing how many scientists don't understand tides yet they put videos out their that are false.
@Science Revolution The block function was invented for complete and utter losers like yourself who think themselves clever because they've learned to cut and paste. Bye now. Back to the basement with you.
final simulation really help me understand why there is two bulges, thank you very much !!!
So many videos get this wrong. You nailed it!
Omg, thanks man. You have no idea how much you help me with this explanation. I never understand the bulge on the far side, until this day. I'm from Brazil and we speak portuguese, never find nothing like this in our language, so today i decide to research in english and i found this. Anyway, thanks again.
Nice work! I still get a kick out of the fact that "spaghettification" is an actual scientific word...
I'm a science teacher and I just found your videos. The animations are superb ! as well as the explanations that go with them. What software do you use to create the animations/simulations? if I may ask ...
Thank you I appreciate that. I mainly use cinema 4d, but any 3d software will do
Ok sir you've gained a new subscriber
@1:30 Just a quick note of clarification: the gravitational force from the moon doesn't lift an object as it is weaker than the Earth's. Even if it was only slightly weaker, it still wouldn't lift anything. The force would be contributing towards cancelling the normal force from the reaction to the Earth's gravitational force, thus objects would just feel lighter. Objects would fall with less acceleration. Objects such as water particles would only rise if the moon's gravitational force was stronger at the Earth's surface.
Thanks for your great videos!
Perfectly explained thanks for adding it here :D
@@Higgsinophysics THE THEORETICAL, CLEAR, AND BALANCED MATHEMATICAL PROOF OF THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA OF NECESSITY:
E=mc2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy! Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Carefully consider what is THE MAN who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=MA ON BALANCE !!! (Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.) Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=MA ON BALANCE !!! ACCORDINGLY, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The sky is blue, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE !!! Carefully consider what is THE EYE. GREAT. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. TIME DILATION ultimately proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Again, gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE !!! Think QUANTUM GRAVITY !!!
By Frank DiMeglio
Very interesting and helpful. Keep up the good work
Thank you for helping me understand why there are two tides a day rather than one.
Yes. So, how about places that have only one high and low tide a day? It doesn't explain that, does it?
Thank you very much for this nice explanation. This video is for watching many times because of the various subtleties arising as for example the influence of the centrifugal force from a non inertial observer point of view because of an externa field!!!
Thank you so much. Very informative.
Kindly explain effect of sun and the effect of rotational motions also.
You just made me realize how complex it is to define "sea level"
no way another video!
Someone on another TH-cam video about the tides asked why the sand isn't pulled by the Moon's gravity?
An excellent and clear explanation.
One question:
If the tidal forces cannot lift the water, then how does the crust rise by about 30 cm?
Thank you! I tried to explain that at 4:20 - It's because a lot of water is being pushed in one direction, then at one end you can see a rise
Thanks. I understand the dynamics of the water being pushed into the bulge zone. But I don't understand the terrestrial tide (which is not the subject of this video)
ohh see, Sorry i misunderstood your question - It's a good question! I haven't looked into that, but I think it's the same answer - water is easily "moved" so it can have a tidal difference of 16 meters some places - but the crust is much more rigid and so the effect is weaker. But I'm not sure
@@Higgsinophysics possibly because the Earth has much more mass for the moon to pull on, compared to the mass of the oceans.
I ,ve seen the description of gravity wells. .& I could not make sense(in my head)of the way they would over lap how the moons gravity well reached across, like some Venn diagram...it was giving me a headache...but...now I get it....than you !
Hairdryer analogy was great
It helped me alot .. thank u
Excellent video! Just to be clear, the tides we finally see are only caused by the tangential components of the gravitational force?
Yes they are, you understand correctly. An upward vertical component of 1/10,000,000th of a g doesn’t have a noticeable effect, when there’s one g pulling downward. But tangential components do accumulate over distance.
nice video
i like what u did
How much of the tidal effect is due to the "squeezing" action of the vertical forces, vs. the "stretching " action of the horizontal forces?
If the gravitational field was only in the x-direction, how much bulging will we get? The reason I ask this question is that in your example of the black hole tearing apart the person, the image is mostly one dimensional but definitely the tidal effect is there.
I imagine 3 masses connected by springs falling vertically in a gravitational field. This is a one dimensional problem. I am not sure if I need a vertical "squeeze" effect to explain the bulges.
the squeeze is 1/2 the amplitude of the stretch, but it acts in 2 transverse dimensions so the total volume change is zero. aka: the tidal tensor is traceless.
The center of mass in the Earth-Moon system, also known as the barycenter, is located within Earth itself. It lies about 4,671 km (2,902 miles) from Earth's center, which is approximately 75% of Earth's radius on the moon side.
While it seems like the Moon orbits Earth, both the Earth and Moon actually orbit this common center of mass. However, because the Earth is much more massive than the Moon, the barycenter is located closer to Earth's center, causing the Earth to wobble slightly as it orbits the barycenter.
This means that the elliptical path we generally attribute to Earth's orbit around the Sun is actually the orbit of the barycenter of the Earth-Moon system. So you would observe the earth wobble about the barycenter the side opposite the moon is traveling faster around the barycenter and thus it is centrifugal force that is causing the bulge opposite the moon in about the same magnitude as the moon facing side.
awesome
Watched this in 3am in the morning and now i can fully rest thanks!!😭😭
"Tide goes in, tide goes out... you can't explain that!" - Bill O'Reilly
😂🤣😂🤣
Now, now, now...The Earth is more than 50,000 km away from the Moon, and is close to the Sun and the planets. Therefore, the Moon’s terrain cannot be seen with the naked eye like before...The Earth will be lost in the depths of infinite space...
This phenomenon confirms my fifth theory (the earth has been lost in the depth of space)...
Yousif A Tobiya
Just another one that doesn't understand the forces behind the secondary tidal wave... Even the primary seems mystic :-)
good one
Is it possible to explain Tide using general relativity?
Btw... I am already impressed with the explanation 🔥
Einstein never nearly understood physics/physical experience. The fact that the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution is not some meaningless coincidence. That is OBVIOUS. Here are the facts.
WHY AND HOW E=MC2 IS NECESSARILY AND CLEARLY F=MA ON BALANCE:
Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. C4 is the proof of the fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. This explains the fourth dimension. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma. ("Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity.) The EARTH/ground AND what is THE SUN are CLEARLY (on balance) E=MC2 AS F=ma. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! (Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.) The sky is blue, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. Great !!! This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! (This ALSO perfectly explains why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution.) It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. INDEED, HALF of the galaxies are "dead" or inert; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE.
Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !! IMPORTANT !! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Consider the man who is standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Accordingly, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course). Moreover, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out EQUAL AREAS in equal times consistent WITH/AS E=MC2, F=ma, AND what is perpetual motion; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Therefore, it is correct that the planets will (very, very, very slightly) move AWAY (ON BALANCE) from what is THE SUN !! Moreover, I have ALSO CLEARLY explained the cosmological redshift AND the "black holes". GRAVITATIONAL force/energy is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. NOW, ON BALANCE, carefully consider what is THE SUN. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. SO, again, it ALL does CLEARLY make perfect sense; AS BALANCE AND COMPLETENESS go hand in hand. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS clearly F=ma on balance. GREAT !!!
By Frank DiMeglio
I like your explanation and you did a great job on the animation. So, the production is really well done. Don’t take this wrong, but you need to enunciate because your words run together.
t seems than that the high tide on the side of the earth opposite the moon would be a bit lower then the high tide on the side of the earth facing the moon is that correct?
Barycentric centrifugal force adds to the back bulge
You can imagine the earth without water, water balances the shape of the earth, and its revolving or orbiting around its self, and the sun. Ebb and tide are considered as a safety vale for the earth, and its rotation.
Earth with water slows its revolving...
The water increased because of the melting of ice caps of polars and Himalayas, therefore the force of revolving increases too...
NOW:The length of the year now is [ 365 1/4 +_(2 minutes )]....
These studies had completed and sent on July 26th 2000...
Yousif A Tobiya
One thing I don’t understand...is why the forces are going away from the earth. I understand the gravitational force and the kind of "forward bulge" aka the bulge going towards the moon, by why is it creating an opposite bulge??? I believe because of inertia but I don’t fully understand.
The centre of gravity for both the moon and earth is far away from the centre of earth. While earth circles around the sun it is also circling around the centre of gravity with the moon. That causes centrifugal forces on the far side that cause a high tide on that side. There is no other reason.
WHY AND HOW E=MC2 IS NECESSARILY AND CLEARLY F=MA ON BALANCE:
Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. C4 is the proof of the fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. This explains the fourth dimension. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma. ("Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity.) The EARTH/ground AND what is THE SUN are CLEARLY (on balance) E=MC2 AS F=ma. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! (Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.) The sky is blue, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. Great !!! This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! (This ALSO perfectly explains why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution.) It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. INDEED, HALF of the galaxies are "dead" or inert; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE.
Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !! IMPORTANT !! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Consider the man who is standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Accordingly, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course). Moreover, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out EQUAL AREAS in equal times consistent WITH/AS E=MC2, F=ma, AND what is perpetual motion; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Therefore, it is correct that the planets will (very, very, very slightly) move AWAY (ON BALANCE) from what is THE SUN !! Moreover, I have ALSO CLEARLY explained the cosmological redshift AND the "black holes". GRAVITATIONAL force/energy is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. NOW, ON BALANCE, carefully consider what is THE SUN. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. SO, again, it ALL does CLEARLY make perfect sense; AS BALANCE AND COMPLETENESS go hand in hand. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS clearly F=ma on balance. GREAT !!!
By Frank DiMeglio
With this video, I could understand why the ocean at the opposite side of the moon also has bulge.
I’ve realized that just with the title “Tidal Patterns”, its not easy to find they site I mentioned on my previous post.
What I had posted on that site was:
“Farther parts of the Earth are NOT SUFFICIENTLY attracted by the Moon in order to follow an orbit equal to the one of Earth´s C.M. (if they could move independently from the rest of the planet).
Due to that, they try to get a farther orbit.
They rest of they planet prevents that, exerting a "moonward" force. And those farther parts exert an opposite reaction force ...
All those forces stretch farther solid Earth´s parts, and where water they so called hide tide bulge builds, trying to reach an equilibrium with own Earth´s attraction (not fully achievable due to they daily Earth´s quick rotation, what also is the cause of the some couple of hours gap between high tide meridian and Moon´s actual position).
A "mirror" phenomenon happens at closer half of the Earth, because its parts are attracted by the Moon TOO MUCH for the average orbit, they try to get a closer orbit, but the rest of they planet prevents it ... “
And if anybody wants to see more about previous discussion, the link to mentioned TH-cam site is:
Tidal Patterns
Abstract :
The energy that dominates the earth is very great, some of it is natural, like the heat of the sun and volcanoes, and some of it is human action, by cutting down trees, without replacing them and cultivating in their place...
There are five forces that control or dominate the planet...
1- The first theory (horizontal dynamic movement) and its end...
The occurrence of storms, rain, floods and snow, at unexpected times and places, is because of the expiration of this theory, which needs to be balanced...
2- The second theory (vertical dynamic movement) and its end...
This movement or force controls or dominates the earthquakes, earth cracks, drying up of rivers and lakes, earth openings, mountain collapses, and the emergence of drinking water springs on the ground...
It becomes out of control...
These phenomena increased due to the end of this theory...
The third theory: it is water that rotates the earth...
The fourth theory: the Earth's axis of rotation has tilted 2° degrees...
The fifth theory: The Earth has a new orbit...
These studies had completed and sent on July 26th 2000
YOUSIF A TOBIYA
so what i understand is that the far bulge of water, is because it lags behind? That doesn't make much sense however, as you said, the earth is not moving toward the earth, thus there is no lag
In the last animation: It shows that the tides are steady in these two spots and are not moving. So doesnt this animation shows that the tides are not moving and that there would always be either high or low tide in these specific places?
I think this model only works for a circle, if we think of a sphere then the bulge created by the vectors will be everywhere i.e. 360 degrees. That is why we will think about the centrifugal force formed by the Moon-Earth couple where the barycenter is not in the center of the Earth.
What program do you use to create these animations?
cool
hmm... so thats the air moon actually pulls and that low pressure points causing water to rise ?
The difference of gravitational force of the moon 384,400km from the earth of 12,740 km in diameter is only 6% difference on opposite sides. This doesn't make the opposite side to have the same tide hight. It has been shown that the rotation of the earth is responsible for the symmetrical tide but no one to this date shown what is exactly the mechanism behind it.
It's because the Earth orbits the barycentre .This causes centrifugal force to add water to back side tidal bulge
@@mikev4621 the centre of the wobbling rotation is situated on the opposite side of the moon. The centrifugal force pulling the liquid up then is higher on the moon side as the ratio of rotation is longer than the opposite side. This gives totally dissymetrical tides.
The problem with these wrong explanations is the use of Newtonia mechanics. In this mechanics, if you are sitting on a chair, you feel your butt smashed because your mass weight is pulled towards the planet with an acceleration of 9.81m/s². In Einstein's mechanics, you are pushed upwards by an ever expanding planet accelerating you 9.81m/s². In such 4 dimensional time space deformation that the true answer can be found.
@@hugueslecorre4893 The centrifugal force isn't "pulling the liquid up" ( your words) - it throws it outwards, away from the planet.
Einstein's visions are useful, but the planet is demonstrably NOT "ever expanding" ( your words)
@@mikev4621 I see you understood the centrifugal force pulling up or out of the decentered rotation is towards the moon and not opposite.
Read about the falling man of Einstein, he explained that the man is not accelerating towards the planet, it is the planet which is accelerating towards him.
@@hugueslecorre4893 Do you honestly think the earth would go out of its way to meet a man who lost contact with his window washing platform ? Would it go out of its way to intercept birds flying above its surface? Do you know how much energy would be needed to deflect the earth out of its orbital plane to do any of that? What does the earth do when window washers on opposite of the earth fall off their platforms? does it spit apart in order to make Einstein right? Don't take Einstein literally- he meant that it is "as if " the earth was moving upwards, not that it actually is.
Still I don't understand one thing. As I understand the bulge closer to the moon should be bigger than the bulge further away from the moon, because of difference in gravity, yet your animation shows them as they are equal size. Did I miss anything?
The difference is in the order of less than 1%.
According to your animation there are no tides around 45 degrees, but reality show this is not true. What is missing?
Your diagrams would be correct if the high tide was directly in line with the moon. As any mariner knows..it isn’t.
Curious to know; what if the Moon would be like Earth and had liquid waters and ATMOSPHERE....what would happened ?!?
the Moon would have a monthly tidal cycle
This doesn't explain the different timing in tides of close-by areas or the extra long periods of high tide near Vancouver.
It also does not explain the very small tides in the tropical area, where the incidence of Moon and Sun are stronger.
Just doesn't explain the absence of tides in entire seas, like Baltic, Japan, Black sea, Agean...
It doesn't explain tides
sloshing in the ocean basins and local undersea geography cause strange shoreline effects
Tides occur on lakes, however the effect is extremely small as there is no water in the lakes to fill the gap that would be otherwise present.
@disciplīna-w1i
If you check the tides charts for the cities around the Great Lakes You will see how wrong you are.
Tides in Toronto in the great lakes are 10 times bigger than any part of the Caribbean, Baltic, sea of Japan, Eastern Mediterranean, Black Sea, Red Sea
You should listen to a flat earther named fakeflip. He is the best oceanographer on the Internet. According to him , tides are made by freshwater springs and the level is restablished by Sink holes on the bottom
@@christiaanhuygens6638 A flat earther? I'm gonna take my sources from people who think they are smarter than scientists?
Also, lakes aren't affected by tides, please try again.
I still Dont get this, they all say the bulge is already there, if bulge of water is always there how come entire earth is rotating under that bulge without being drowned? Does this also means that all fishes and turtles stays on the same bulge and earth just is sweeping under them.
My head is spinning 😅
The bulges shown here are greatly exaggerated.The water only rises a max of about 2 feet in the deep parts of the oceans
It is the slightly slinger of Earths rotation,
(deformation)
as causes the tide-Wave,
Moon just follow the slinger.
hmm.. so it acts like magnets and give earths grawity some kind of boost instead mixing gravitional centers it seems.
but in the simulation earth is moving towards the moon !!! , but in reality its not , the moon instead is in a free fall towards the earth , plz heelp
The Earth and the Moon are orbiting a point called the barycenter, it is the center of mass of both the objects. When this happens, the Earth experiences centripetal force, which causes the same tide effect.
First
I think I am the only one not understanding
Have you ever considered that it might be earth tides increasing due to a change in gravity at the Earth's core? I believe the oceans are pushed from underneath.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_tide
Up
Nice cartoon but thats about it
Everything this guy said is complete nonsense