The Leap Year as Explained by Neil deGrasse Tyson | StarTalk

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.พ. 2016
  • Neil deGrasse Tyson explains the logic behind the leap year, with a brief history in calendars as well.
    ➡ Subscribe: bit.ly/NatGeoSubscribe
    ➡ Watch all clips of StarTalk here: bit.ly/WatchStarTalk
    ➡ Get More StarTalk: on.natgeo.com/2lUqxTT
    About StarTalk:
    Host Neil deGrasse Tyson brings together celebrities, scientists and comedians to explore a variety of cosmic topics and collide pop culture with science in a way that late-night television has never seen before. Weekly topics range from popular science fiction, space travel, extraterrestrial life, the Big Bang, to the future of Earth and the environment. Tyson is an astrophysicist with a gifted ability to connect with everyone, inspiring us all to to "keep looking up."
    Get More National Geographic:
    Official Site: bit.ly/NatGeoOfficialSite
    Facebook: bit.ly/FBNatGeo
    Twitter: bit.ly/NatGeoTwitter
    Instagram: bit.ly/NatGeoInsta
    About National Geographic:
    National Geographic is the world's premium destination for science, exploration, and adventure. Through their world-class scientists, photographers, journalists, and filmmakers, Nat Geo gets you closer to the stories that matter and past the edge of what's possible.
    The Leap Year as Explained by Neil deGrasse Tyson | StarTalk
    • The Leap Year as Expla...
    National Geographic
    / natgeo
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 333

  • @SilviusLucaTV
    @SilviusLucaTV 3 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    It's a very simple thing, but he explain it like an amazing story.

    • @Melan.D
      @Melan.D ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's the story that makes it simple to understand.

  • @ShaheerS2
    @ShaheerS2 8 ปีที่แล้ว +167

    I learned something today.

  • @nimishachowdhury4577
    @nimishachowdhury4577 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Tried to understand this by reading a lot of article. Did not understand. But this 3 mins clip made everything crystal clear. Value of a teacher. Something so complicated can be explained so clearly by a person. Makes it so much easier to understand.

    • @bibhasdmusic
      @bibhasdmusic 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same. 😅

  • @nickpapagiorgio8955
    @nickpapagiorgio8955 8 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    "And you give it to the neediest month"... lol

  • @theseigemeister
    @theseigemeister 8 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    This was actually pretty interesting. Thanks Neil.

  • @AndyHoward
    @AndyHoward 8 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    MIND BLOWN
    [Didn't know about the Correction by taking out a Leap Day every 100 years]

    • @MuhammadEgypt
      @MuhammadEgypt 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Andy Howard me neither!

    • @sirlockoff
      @sirlockoff 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +Andy Howard Only when not divisible by 400 years ;))

    • @AndyHoward
      @AndyHoward 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah my brain melted after I heard that part.

    • @majorsanders4525
      @majorsanders4525 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Andy Howard all I heard was "where da fried chicken and white women at" LOL TRUMP 2016 , NOW OR NEVER

    • @figocooldude
      @figocooldude 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Major Sanders He got your white woman, and your chicken. I guess I understand why you'll be voting for trump.

  • @ParulsPalate
    @ParulsPalate 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Excellent explanation. Learnt something new today

  • @lator1941
    @lator1941 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I could listen to him all day

  • @benzourry87
    @benzourry87 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Never thought that explanation of leap year could be this interesting.

  • @Plan_and_Plane
    @Plan_and_Plane 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for explaining this!

  • @lodoegyatso4199
    @lodoegyatso4199 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I went around so many video to understand leap year and I couldn't , till Now!! Thank you

    • @keep_walking_on_grass
      @keep_walking_on_grass 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      even if the general opinion about it is the opposite: In my opinion, whether something is understood depends more on the teacher and not so much on the person learning.

  • @wrongway1100
    @wrongway1100 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Sometimes, asking the questions will give you the answer you wanted. To which you will regret ever asking that question.

  • @ChristopherAde
    @ChristopherAde 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    2:57 "It's like, nuooo"

  • @familyguy2313
    @familyguy2313 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Oh my God he's so smart it hurts

  • @pranavkulkarni9061
    @pranavkulkarni9061 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir

  • @paulocunha3799
    @paulocunha3799 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We have been taught in the school and universities that the Leap Year was invented by the Romans but I have read in Buddhist Text (Vinaya Pitika) that the concept of Leap Year was prevailed in the ancient India, at least before the 7th century BC. Buddhist monks used to calculate leap year during the Rainy Retreat.

    • @cinnamonstar808
      @cinnamonstar808 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      that not true. Time itself is a black invention. ( The West steal all the books and dont know what they are doing)
      The Africans had calculated that the solar year was actually closer to 3651/4 days. After 1,460 solar years, or four periods of 365 years, 1,461 years had passed.
      The main reason why Western societies use the 4 year method; its because their society dont have dynasties. They count time by 'wars'
      Ancient india was started by People leaving the Nile Valley; so he will have knowledge of it. = BECAUSE its the same people.
      You can see yoga being done on Egyptian walls. the same windows in ancient Ethiopians buildings have the same design in ancient India.
      1+1 = 2.
      THIS is why there are 2 indias WEST INDIA and EAST INDIA ; India just means brown/black people in far away lands.. a sort of kin to politcal migration
      this is why the West Indies = are called that in the Caribbean, "indies" is plural for indian nations.
      You were also told Columbus was going to India. this is true. He knew he was going to WEST INDIA. He did not discover America by accident, they planned a heisted to retrive mansa's gold. Every muslim knew the story of Mansa going to the land West of Africa with thousands of ships. and that family dynasty was worth over 400 billion in gold. You are told that fake story to hid the fact that the new Spain Kingdom was conducting a robbery. BIBLE and new lands is a cover for robbery.
      Columbus stop in West Africa for guidance; because that kingdom is the caretaker of this side of the world. and East Africa looked after EAST INDIA
      both Indias are dominions of Africa.
      THEY LIE SO MUCH, ironically the truth is stubborn against time.
      Neil sat and not mention Africa because he knows how triggering it is to fragile minds. ALL HISTORY IS BLACK

  • @sean9177
    @sean9177 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The more you know I like learning

  • @FarisGuitar
    @FarisGuitar 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That was aowsome explanation

  • @jonesvictor5801
    @jonesvictor5801 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Learnt a lot

  • @DJKrowbarKE
    @DJKrowbarKE 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mind blowing....

  • @Mogambokhooshhua
    @Mogambokhooshhua ปีที่แล้ว

    I love this video and it tells me so much

  • @PhoneticIHype
    @PhoneticIHype 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    CGP Grey's video on this perfectly explains what is being said and includes helpful visuals!

    • @carultch
      @carultch 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +PhoneticIHype
      I like how he explains the ballerina on a flatbed truck, and expecting her spin rate to have any connection to the truck's cruising speed is extremely unrealistic.
      I think a more practical example would be a concrete mixer's rotating barrel. But if it is mechanically driven by the engine, instead of driven by an independent motor, then it does have a connection to the truck's cruising speed.

  • @dwayneclarke2197
    @dwayneclarke2197 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow. Amazing

  • @RuanBSBrandao
    @RuanBSBrandao 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome!

  • @Auton2
    @Auton2 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    great explanation. thx

  • @rodr8523
    @rodr8523 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I wonder how much better the world would be if Mr. Tyson published a relevant paper for every tv interview he has.

    • @nacirema2710
      @nacirema2710 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +rodr Well aren't you just salty af.

    • @MindTrip7
      @MindTrip7 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nacirema2710 some people understand science and know this guy is just a TV personality.
      Half his statements are contradictory. Ie. He states UV is in the red spectrum.

  • @BCElginTex
    @BCElginTex 8 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    LOL. I though he was going to really impress us and start going on about leap seconds.

    • @wisewhiterabbit
      @wisewhiterabbit 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He just did in a seperate video.

    • @ontop2324
      @ontop2324 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wisewhiterabbit where

    • @wisewhiterabbit
      @wisewhiterabbit 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ontop2324 he explained in a short one very recently, i say recent because they're video chatting. but he talks about celebrating a leap second with his family and friends.

  • @MegaWesen
    @MegaWesen 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    You blowin ma mind Neil!

  • @obibakwekuadoma8482
    @obibakwekuadoma8482 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    really educated with this video. nice one there

  • @eminems99
    @eminems99 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    such an amazing video. why would anyone dislike an informational video/?

    • @D_isco_D_ancer
      @D_isco_D_ancer 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +eminems99 Trolls, NDT can explain that to you aswell.

    • @dalikskorsgaard3706
      @dalikskorsgaard3706 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      because it took him about 3 minutes longer than is necessary to explain this.

    • @daemoniumvenator7099
      @daemoniumvenator7099 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dalikskorsgaard3706 shut up

  • @DareStiney
    @DareStiney 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow!

  • @benadams3569
    @benadams3569 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I don't remember where I had learned this (originally), but it makes me shake my head when, during the daylight saving time (and the end), people talk about "and leap year is pointless, too."
    I always want to reply with..."No, there IS a reason for that," but I just leave them alone in the ignorance.

  • @tonyaguilar2151
    @tonyaguilar2151 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    i remember meeting him and he try to explain gravity with 5 dollars, thanks for the lesson and the 5 bucks..lol

  • @dagotone
    @dagotone 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Born February 29th 1984. My actual birthday is this Monday the 29th. Couldn't care less LOL.

  • @JoshuaDuChene
    @JoshuaDuChene 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Anybody else notice the overdub at 3:07 to correct the year to 1582? ;-)

  • @eli4u2fly
    @eli4u2fly 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Neil is the best!

    • @PENNSWORDFISHER
      @PENNSWORDFISHER 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Pitbull Puppy ....yes kneal ties his sun up.....hahahaha

  • @isaacomnus883
    @isaacomnus883 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's cool. I didn't know it.

  • @isit420ornottheyoutubechan7
    @isit420ornottheyoutubechan7 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Welcome aboard the Leap Day Playlist that I'll be sharing tomorrow... and Happy Birthday Fellow Leapling... if that is the case... either way... I thought I'd share...

  • @KodyMooneyham
    @KodyMooneyham 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone know the music in the background?

  • @calibomber209
    @calibomber209 8 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    NASA says there's 23 hours 56mins for every full rotation of the earth , so everyday for four years we stack up those extra 4mins and have an extra day. This is not how the calendar was made but how we get leap year day.

    • @blindandwatching
      @blindandwatching 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Go back and reread the NASA article on the length of the day. They explain everything. The Earth is moving around the Sun while it rotates. The Earth turns around in that 23 hour plus time period but but thats an apparent rotation because the Earths movement during the day. The time to return to its original starting point is 24 hours.

  • @LovesAlchemist
    @LovesAlchemist 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tomorrow is my birthday, wohoooooo thank you Neil for the breakdown

  • @nickcline3792
    @nickcline3792 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    when I was a child, I figured out that a year is actually 365.2424 days. though I'm not sure what precision it was or how i figured that out. I think I pulled random numbers out of my behind, but based on this video that figure sounds correct

  • @helping_others
    @helping_others ปีที่แล้ว

    Time is really getting faster isn't it x

  • @caruser4
    @caruser4 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Anybody notice at 3:07 they edited the audio? It looks like he said 1584.

  • @carlmoore3215
    @carlmoore3215 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Not an INTEGER (shouldn't say "even") number of days in solar year.

  • @Shloeb
    @Shloeb 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow

  • @ThandiNC
    @ThandiNC 8 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Every computer programmer know this :)

    • @josephpullium913
      @josephpullium913 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Robert Riley that insult was so unnecessary and weak.

    • @AbirHasanDipu
      @AbirHasanDipu 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      yup, just used it in my program, came here to remember the reasons. :)

    • @virendrakamble4210
      @virendrakamble4210 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol

    • @uraniumgaming123
      @uraniumgaming123 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao so true
      I just started and i came for reasoning behind those 3 conditions

  • @PrateekK
    @PrateekK 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Wonderful explanation as always! Although, I'm now pondering on the 400-year rule clause which puts the leap day back in - aren't we over-correcting that also over a much larger period of time? Is it so large that we don't care about it?

    • @joesimba
      @joesimba 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      yeah your right, it's said after approximately 3000plus years we'll be ahead by a day

    • @R3cce
      @R3cce 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@joesimba
      off by 1 day every 3236 years exactly

    • @tayaiahanthem6720
      @tayaiahanthem6720 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Gonna see if that's right or not😅

  • @gnouveli
    @gnouveli 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    *if* (year is not divisible by 4) *then* (it is a common year)
    *else if* (year is not divisible by 100) *then* (it is a leap year)
    *else if* (year is not divisible by 400) *then* (it is a common year)
    *else* (it is a leap year)

    • @carultch
      @carultch 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +‍ ‍
      Can we do better?
      How about:
      if (year %4 !=0) then it is a common year
      else if (year % 128 == 0) then it is a common year
      else (it is a leap year)
      That would still make the calendar line up just as well with reality as it does in the Gregorian Calendar, except there would be one less else if statement.

    • @gnouveli
      @gnouveli 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      carultch good, programmer. keep up the good work

    • @leofunks31
      @leofunks31 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@carultch I like what you've done. Can you explain why 128 though?

    • @carultch
      @carultch 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@leofunks31 Because the current system accounts for an exception to the rule of the divisible-by-four leap day rule, effectively every 125 years (just positioned at 3 out of 4 turn-of-the-centuries, instead of multiples of 125). But the actual state of affairs is that amount we should compensate for this over-correction it is much closer to once every 128 years.
      365.24219879 days in a tropical year
      365.25 days in a Julian year
      Difference = 0.0078012
      Take the reciprocal = 128.185

  • @joesimba
    @joesimba ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So how long again will it take for us to NOT put a leap day in a century year divisible by 400 that would have normally got a leap day.

    • @R3cce
      @R3cce 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is off by 1 day every 3236 years exactly

  • @Chimonger1
    @Chimonger1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sooo....how is it that the Mayan calendar is supposed to be more accurate? Does it also have leap days/years?
    OR what about the other calendars...?

  • @GreekSolid
    @GreekSolid 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Programming 101 would be a so much easier if I have seen this video back then.

  • @dizzlefshizzle
    @dizzlefshizzle 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So are we behind time or before time or is there form of time travel???

  • @okamiuniverse
    @okamiuniverse 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm a leap year baby. my birthday us tomorrow and im so excited

    • @Razor-hh6ru
      @Razor-hh6ru 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      in 2017 your birthday will be on Feb. 28 or March 1 or next leap year.

    • @okamiuniverse
      @okamiuniverse 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      feb 28 of 2017 will be my birthday until next leap year

  • @DannyGmusicc
    @DannyGmusicc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what correction do we do for the sidereal day to the solar day as the sidereal day is 23.56 minutes

  • @RamonEzekielPReyes
    @RamonEzekielPReyes 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who is watching this on al leap day? Feb 29, 2020 anyone?

  • @PesoChi
    @PesoChi 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Key and Peele

  • @nazin.s
    @nazin.s ปีที่แล้ว

    There was no correction of century years in Julian Calendar and we used it in Imperial Russia, so we still celebrate "Old New Year" on January 14 and Christmas on January 7. And these dates will change in 2100

  • @-KillaWatt-
    @-KillaWatt- 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Imagine a document dated 1716. Historian's would say it was 300yrs ago. But the calendars used at the time differs. The authorship date would greatly differ from our calculations because between the two calendars a leap year is not recognized in the one from 1716. If i were to ask you how long ago was the document above written if its dated 1716? you would say 300yrs ago. But that would be wrong.

  • @daveCATpiano
    @daveCATpiano 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I will explain that to my kids on the year 2400

  • @valeoxis
    @valeoxis 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    "YOU ARE LIKE 'NOOOOOOOOOOO' "

  • @thepepener446
    @thepepener446 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    The time at which...

  • @yvesgomes
    @yvesgomes 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    When I heard the first part: "I had guessed it. I'm awesome."... then I heard the rest and was like: "WTF?! I'm such a noob!"

  • @MuhammadEgypt
    @MuhammadEgypt 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    In Egypt there's a myth that a leap year is not a good year. Geez!

    • @MuhammadEgypt
      @MuhammadEgypt 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      ***** Well, I guess some people do believe in that, especially the pessimists.

    • @blackpride354
      @blackpride354 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Mohamed Farouk
      😂😂 That's a Good One!!!

    • @ivankraljevic1
      @ivankraljevic1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Asim Rai I hope so ;)

    • @antopolskiy
      @antopolskiy 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Mohamed Farouk In Russia also

    • @carultch
      @carultch 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Mohamed Farouk
      Modern Egypt or ancient Egypt?

  • @KombatGod
    @KombatGod 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The thing I never got though is why do the months need to be that messed up. I mean what kind of sense does it make to have
    31, 28/29, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31 ?
    Why can't it be
    30, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31, 30, 30/31 ?
    It would still add up to 365/366 !

  • @LoveNLoot
    @LoveNLoot 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If we had a gregorian calendar long enough would the leap go on forever?

  • @peterg3729
    @peterg3729 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    `How do people not get this

  • @stuf4tdadamemd890
    @stuf4tdadamemd890 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A few minutes of words that can be stated in four lines of code:
    --------
    *if* (year is not divisible by 4) *then* (it is a common year)
    *else if* (year is not divisible by 100) *then* (it is a leap year)
    *else if* (year is not divisible by 400) *then* (it is a common year)
    *else* (it is a leap year)
    --------
    If Neil had wanted to blow people's minds, then he would have explained how this *4x100=400* is the exact same ratio in the size & distance of the Sun & Moon. They appear in our sky as the same size because the Sun is 400 times larger than the Moon, and is 400 times further away than the Moon.
    The calendar is driven by Sun & Moon with the Earth's rotation & revolution.
    So the Sun-Moon-Earth relationship has a similar mathematical pattern in both time and space. Mind *...blown*.

    • @stuf4tdadamemd890
      @stuf4tdadamemd890 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      ...and another Sun-Moon similarity is with the Sun's rotation and the Moon's orbit. Both take *27 days*.
      (Exact definitions are explained in the Wikipedia articles on 'Solar rotation' and 'Lunar month'.)

    • @carultch
      @carultch 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +stuf4 Tdadamemd
      I don't think it has anything to do with the sun and moon relative sizes and distance.
      We could've just as easily made every 128 years the exception to the general rule of multiples of 4 being a leap year, and still been just as accurate.

    • @carultch
      @carultch 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +stuf4 Tdadamemd
      The sun doesn't rotate as a rigid body, so it doesn't just have one period of rotation.
      The sun takes 24.47 days to rotate at the equator and 35 days at the poles, as measured relative to distant stars. The 27 days thing, is when you measure it relative to an observer on Earth.
      Also, the moon's 27.3 day period is measured relative to the distant stars (sidereal month), while its 29.5 day period (synodic month) is measured relative to our observation on Earth.

  • @sagarkapasi099
    @sagarkapasi099 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Uploaded On 27th Feb

  • @sourodipbiswas2001
    @sourodipbiswas2001 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about the error of 365.2425-365.2375 i.e. the error of 0.005 days/year? how can this error of 0.005 days/year be rectified?

    • @abhishekanshuwali3808
      @abhishekanshuwali3808 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sourodip Biswas fuck u

    • @jameshavard3182
      @jameshavard3182 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes , this is corrected if the groundhog sees his shadow on a year divisible by 14 but only if the groundhog did not see his shadow in the previous two years.

  • @xxjonboy
    @xxjonboy 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A small mistake in this explanation, depending on where you're talking about. "1700 was not a leap year". Well, true, not on continental Europe, but here in England and her possessions (North America being one) we did not adopt the Gregorian calendar until 1752, so 1700 would have operated under the old rules of being a leap year.

    • @jasonpalacios1363
      @jasonpalacios1363 ปีที่แล้ว

      Except Scotland and the Colony/US State of Maryland where the Gregorian Calendar were used.

    • @xxjonboy
      @xxjonboy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jasonpalacios1363 Scotland changed its New Year's Day to January 1 in 1600 but did not adopt the Gregorian calendar until 1752. Maryland would also have adopted the calendar in 1752 as a British colony.

    • @DD-pz3kf
      @DD-pz3kf 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Touche'

  • @carultch
    @carultch 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    It would make more sense if we just said, every year that is a multiple of 128 is not a leap year. And all other multiples of 4 years are leap years. That way we only have one exception to deal with.
    Can't find the multiples of 128? Just express the year in binary. It will be a year that ends in 7 zeros when expressed in binary.

  • @MarieAnonylopolous
    @MarieAnonylopolous 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wow... he's so smart.. please Neil, tell us how the earth is an oblate spheroid and pear shape, but pictures show a perfect sphere... please explain

    • @sandreid87
      @sandreid87 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Natalie Thompson Are you alluding something?

    • @LanceBeckman
      @LanceBeckman 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lol go home your drunk

    • @jeremy2626
      @jeremy2626 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're right! Somebody is lying...never really thought about it

    • @jeremy2626
      @jeremy2626 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why don't we just switch back to the lunar calendar ? Every month gets 28 days. Makes more sense

    • @jayo3074
      @jayo3074 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      fail...the earth is flat!
      - B.O.B

  • @richardfreyre
    @richardfreyre 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Captions?

  • @lindaross783
    @lindaross783 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My mother told me many years age on Leap year her daughters can propose to whomever they choose. Its Leap Year. Neil, you've been asked! You're the coolest. I'm too old so you can relax

  • @knoobidade
    @knoobidade 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Play it on half speed. You're welcome.

  • @ROCeinstien
    @ROCeinstien 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    And yesterday was leap year

  • @michaelchristensen5965
    @michaelchristensen5965 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Talk about long term planning.

  • @chriswinston157
    @chriswinston157 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    hey Agis here

  • @noname-gn3xj
    @noname-gn3xj 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's always now.

  • @nihaal1747
    @nihaal1747 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'll just act like I understood everything he said.

  • @ajaykhakh
    @ajaykhakh ปีที่แล้ว

    I learned leap year in school but no one taught us about 100 year rule and 400 year rule

    • @fromnorway643
      @fromnorway643 ปีที่แล้ว

      The length of the *_tropical year_* (the type of year controlling the seasons and which our calendar is based on) is 365.24219 days. The goal for inserting or taking out a day is to get the length of the average calendar year as close to the tropical year as possible to avoid getting out of sync with the seasons.
      The net effect over time from the three adjustments mentioned by Tyson is to add 0.25 - 0.01 + 0.0025 = 0.2425 days, changing the length of the calendar year from 365 to 365.2425 days.
      To get even closer, we would need to take out one day roughly every 3000th year, but that hasn't been implemented yet as far as I know.

  • @marlboroman3002
    @marlboroman3002 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Leap year exist
    Me: Another day to smoke pot

  • @MistahBryan
    @MistahBryan 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, out of curiosity....
    Are we ahead, or behind where we SHOULD be??

    • @Hornet85
      @Hornet85 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Mistah Bryan Everything is even in 2000. Now we are slightly overcompensating again each 4 years, so we are slightly ahead. We will do so until 2100 where we will be about almost 1 day ahead, then we will minus out that one day. Almost, which means we will slightly minus too much. So, after doing it 4 times, in 2400, we would have be lagging by exactly one day. So we'll add that one day back, and everything will be even in 2400.

  • @gamenerd4322
    @gamenerd4322 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    sounds simple enough

  • @fieldstvl
    @fieldstvl 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    As it was established when?! 3:06

  • @WanderinWizard
    @WanderinWizard 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    🤯

  • @jeromelbbs9592
    @jeromelbbs9592 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😮

  • @zarkoff45
    @zarkoff45 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    He said nothing about the "Paladin of the Lost Hour"

  • @uncokee
    @uncokee 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    that edit tho ;)

  • @MyReluctantTheology
    @MyReluctantTheology 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As much as I enjoy Neil deGrasse Tyson's comments, as he's a pretty intelligent guy, there are some other good videos that explain the exact same thing, but with diagrams. Maybe someone should now take Tyson's talking in this video, and put diagrams over it. Who am I kidding? He explains it pretty damn well.

  • @Seryma86
    @Seryma86 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lol I always hated the use of calendars tbh. I’d be cool not keeping track and just living life

  • @nyy190343
    @nyy190343 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So glad other people are in charge of math and not me

  • @lucasgameskleijweg3603
    @lucasgameskleijweg3603 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why was that introduced?

  • @helloworld81326
    @helloworld81326 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How Many Days
    365 ÷ 5 = 73
    or 366 ÷ 6 = 61

  • @minecraftmaster3
    @minecraftmaster3 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    wow so i was born on 2000 2 29 so i was born on the century rule wow im lucky....also i just realised doesnt that make me 4 tomorrow cuz tomorrow is a leap day....dam people born on leap year are young lol

    • @bigboylasagna2150
      @bigboylasagna2150 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      LUCKYYY

    • @yugandali
      @yugandali 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Uzume Tennouboshi Happy birthday (a little late)

    • @taylorlawrence8097
      @taylorlawrence8097 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      same bday😂🙌❤

    • @yvesgomes
      @yvesgomes 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol... you should only age one year every 400. Do you have long fangs?

    • @ladyrynne
      @ladyrynne 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      i can only imagine haha btw nice birth date shiro

  • @Stefan-bx9xb
    @Stefan-bx9xb 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This guy is more an actor than a scientist.

    • @nacirema2710
      @nacirema2710 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Stefan Denchev Then what does that make Richard Dawkins and Bill Nye?

  • @DeoGratias02
    @DeoGratias02 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can't we make a more perfect calendar by increasing the number of hours in a day?

    • @loply9724
      @loply9724 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That would mean we would get off with our planetary rotation. We have our days down perfectly, the problem is our days don’t perfectly fit into the revolution around the sun. So changing the time each day, while it might solve the each year problem, would throw off our time every day slightly. Eventually you would get problems like the sun rising in the afternoon or noon and midnight switching.

  • @laurelkerossow9924
    @laurelkerossow9924 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm so jealous of the Leaplings who were born in 2000.

  • @rasbydorton1
    @rasbydorton1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I tried posting this vid and FB would not allow it because it didn’t didn’t meet their community standards. can you tell me why? Neil deGrasse?