E120: Banking crisis and the great VC reset

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.4K

  • @sunray426
    @sunray426 ปีที่แล้ว +598

    Frieberg is a treasure of the pod. He has a holistic view, not oversimplify things, pretending he knows the answer which shows he is the wisest one. Always eager to listen to him

    • @xsw882
      @xsw882 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      he's just way too pro elite, nothing to see here, global order is fine as is
      He's acting as if everything would have been perfect if not for the lockdowns
      Delusional

    • @einerus
      @einerus ปีที่แล้ว +17

      That’s why we need stand-alone podcast with him.

    • @borrowedPixels
      @borrowedPixels ปีที่แล้ว +4

      💯

    • @jirigoyen
      @jirigoyen ปีที่แล้ว +41

      IMO the only bestie who doesn't let his ego or insecurities stand in the way

    • @simonnilsson5356
      @simonnilsson5356 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      This was his best one imo. I appreciate how we always zooms out to look at pretty much every topic from a kind of ’first principles’ perspective. Economically and socially.

  • @pythagoran
    @pythagoran ปีที่แล้ว +184

    Friedberg in his zone is something to behold.

    • @Sueni
      @Sueni ปีที่แล้ว

      Sychophant

  • @adeebkhan9079
    @adeebkhan9079 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    I would love to have one solid hour of Friedberg just talk about science. He simplifies incredibly complex topics with ease and shows the relevance to our daily lives. Probably my favourite person from this podcast.

  • @koryporter9291
    @koryporter9291 ปีที่แล้ว +123

    the crew loves to tease Friedberg, yet he just chills and delivers wisdoms. Humble af

    • @mickeybeavison1053
      @mickeybeavison1053 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nobody on this podcast is humble.

    • @FinanceVector
      @FinanceVector ปีที่แล้ว

      I do kinda perk up whenever Friedberg jumps in because I can't predict or don"t always know what angle he comes at any particular topic.
      Even when I can tell what his bias might be overall, it doesn't always determine his take on a topic.

  • @sambone5000
    @sambone5000 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    Friedberg needs a science podcast ASAP

    • @Sueni
      @Sueni ปีที่แล้ว

      Sychophant alert

  • @bb4726-h5e
    @bb4726-h5e ปีที่แล้ว +143

    I’m a fan. But as a career banker, this was difficult to listen to. 1. A bank that offers ‘vault service’ for holding cash isn’t a bank. Banks are required to serve the community in which they operate via taking deposits and making loans. 2. A money market fund doesn’t make ‘loans’. A real MMF simply buy t-bills and short term depos. Anything else is not an MMF. 3. SVB failed due to poorly managed concentration risk. Their balance sheet primarily consisted of assets AND liabilities of speculative tech startups and small businesses. The liquidity shortage was a function of this risk.

    • @giffica
      @giffica ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Surprise that the ego squad who talks about which country they visited each week like any normal people give af are a bunch of elitist azzhols. Woah. Crazy.

    • @Hoodiism
      @Hoodiism ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Well said . All in folks had to save their ass.

    • @xsw882
      @xsw882 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      why did the other 4 banks fail?

    • @xsw882
      @xsw882 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​​@@BootsieTheGreek he could easily know know more than them, theyre just VCs in tech

    • @growthaddiction4275
      @growthaddiction4275 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BootsieTheGreek was thinking the same thing

  • @duramajin3118
    @duramajin3118 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Alright everybody welcome to the bailed out podcast.

  • @NishathPodakkudiyar
    @NishathPodakkudiyar ปีที่แล้ว +71

    The shock on Jcal's face when Chamath nonchalantly said 'dumb tangent 😂 Also, Friedberg deserves better companions during his science corner than these three! Time for a spinoff science corner podcast!

    • @optometristic
      @optometristic ปีที่แล้ว

      Reach out to "Stuff you should know"

  • @gatesbev
    @gatesbev ปีที่แล้ว +4

    These bank crisis are so worrisome. This whole financial crisis and the Great Recession posed the most significant macroeconomic challenges for the United States in a half-century, leaving behind high unemployment and below-target inflation and calling for highly accommodative monetary policies. And this only the beginning!

    • @ambertraceyy
      @ambertraceyy ปีที่แล้ว +3

      People fail to understand the fact that banks are corporate entities also governed by greed. Since 2020, the banks have been over-leveraging their assets, which was one of the reasons for SVB's implosion. I have never been okay with keeping much money in the bank. I simply invest through my financial advisor, collect my profits, which I then spend and im comfortable with it!

    • @josephbush
      @josephbush ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ambertraceyy Over the years, I have learnt not to trust corporations. I was badly hit by the '08 financial crisis. Since 2019, I've just been focused on investing through a financial advisor, and it has been paying off, and I'm never going back to banks full time. Still a millionaire.

    • @josephbush
      @josephbush ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Andersonstew My advisor is ‘’HEATHER LEE LARIONI’’ she’s highly qualified and experienced in the financial market. She has extensive knowledge of portfolio diversity and is considered an expert in the field. I recommend researching her credentials further. She has many years of experience and is a valuable resource for anyone looking to navigate the financial market

    • @kumarsingh001
      @kumarsingh001 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@josephbush Oh great recommendation! I happen to know Heather too. She is also my adviser. totally recommend her.

  • @Sventasis
    @Sventasis ปีที่แล้ว +114

    Congratulations on the bailout guys

    • @Blue_8800
      @Blue_8800 ปีที่แล้ว

      No chill,eh!

  • @10percentforthebigdementedguy
    @10percentforthebigdementedguy ปีที่แล้ว +44

    The bestie bailouts. Good for you guys. All these bank issues had me worried about the struggling billionaires out there. Glad the working class can step in to save you. 🙏🏻

    • @10percentforthebigdementedguy
      @10percentforthebigdementedguy ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aaayyy1953 Well, paid for by the tax payers. Because billionaires forget/ignore that there is something called fractional reserve banking and didn’t bother to do their due diligence because who cares when you always get a bailout. This is why capitalism doesn’t work, because we don’t have it. These people are all about socializing losses but privatizing gains. If this was a farmers bank or whatever they would let it go belly up. But God forbid that billionaire VCs lost while gambling.

  • @sleepEasy2
    @sleepEasy2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Change the podcast name to Welfare Queens now 😅

  • @cedricyarish7464
    @cedricyarish7464 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    Science corner is the best part of this

  • @edwardlee8656
    @edwardlee8656 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Friedberg makes me so hopeful for the future. So valuable to have this kind of clear communication to evangelize our most important technological projects 1:17:31

    • @GarciaCapital
      @GarciaCapital ปีที่แล้ว +1

      1:24:30 and Sack’s reaction to Freidberg’s motivating speech gives me hope for comedy 😂

  • @Chucky72
    @Chucky72 ปีที่แล้ว +318

    Wild that Jason prevented a massive banking crisis by using caps lock.

    • @mgetommy
      @mgetommy ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ​@@patrickmccarthy5617 that's not a haircut that's getting wiped out

    • @SS-up5sc
      @SS-up5sc ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The depositors had to be fully insured, imagine the mayhem if the FED didn’t come out say that every cent in SVB and any bank is insured to the full, it would have completely destroyed the economy and the banking system, if I deposit my money in a bank I know that’s the safest place I can put it, if that trust is gone the financial system collapses

    • @SS-up5sc
      @SS-up5sc ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I am with the shareholders and investors losing their money because that comes with inherent risks and rewards that they knew about; but the depositors losing money destroys the whole point of a bank right?

    • @EGMontesano
      @EGMontesano ปีที่แล้ว +7

      You mean wild that they promoted a general bank run so their money would be subsidized? Yeah, wild!

    • @giffica
      @giffica ปีที่แล้ว +10

      You mean by whining like a crybaby?

  • @jeremywozunk2643
    @jeremywozunk2643 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    The fact that Jcal felt the need to say “this isn’t an apology” over 10 times is revealing imo

    • @Dedicated_.1
      @Dedicated_.1 ปีที่แล้ว

      What is it revealing? Genuine question.

  • @crazyad8
    @crazyad8 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Shout out Yellen’s Milk for feeding these babies

    • @uzah88
      @uzah88 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Yeah it’s hard to listen to them the same. Crying for socialism when they lose. Whatever.

    • @Melusi
      @Melusi ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Privatize gains, socialize losses. Rinse. Repeat.

    • @victarion1571
      @victarion1571 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😅😅😂😂

  • @singular9
    @singular9 ปีที่แล้ว +124

    Sachs "I always told everyone to not go with SVB"
    Also Sachs: Had money in svb.

    • @vinny2688
      @vinny2688 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      These guys are just a bunch of crooks

    • @brandonna606
      @brandonna606 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sounds hypocritical but I think it’s two completely different things. Like telling someone not to start a crypto company but you invest in the crypto space for arbitrage gain. Short term it could be beneficial but long term could be a problem

    • @pointbite
      @pointbite ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What is the time of that quote?

    • @kawikanewton9229
      @kawikanewton9229 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@pointbite it was last pod. Not sure the time

    • @pointbite
      @pointbite ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kawikanewton9229 So there is a good chance you misquoted him?

  • @teslapinscher8479
    @teslapinscher8479 ปีที่แล้ว +127

    Great job guys. All that crying in the media finally paid off. Bailout rewarded!

    • @edubmf
      @edubmf ปีที่แล้ว +6

      how many weeks before we are back to loving the "free market"?

  • @avaalice9291
    @avaalice9291 ปีที่แล้ว +906

    Thank you for this wonderful video! I have incurred so much losses trading on my own....I trade well on demo but I think the real market is manipulated.... Can anyone help me out or at least tell me what I'm doing wrong?

    • @saviourmark3153
      @saviourmark3153 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same here, My portfolio has been going down the drain while I try trading,l just don't know what I do wrong

    • @gunterstefan1441
      @gunterstefan1441 ปีที่แล้ว

      Trading with an expert is the best strategy for newbies and busy investors who have little or no time to monitor trade

    • @bettysandra4817
      @bettysandra4817 ปีที่แล้ว

      I strongly advise you against self trading, it's really dangerous and had brought so many investors down, you need someone with the knowledge and strategies, someone dedicated to the crypto currency market business, and I will strongly recommend expert, Mrs Janet

    • @alexandralilley9289
      @alexandralilley9289 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow I'm just shock you mentioned and recommended Expert Mrs Janet,I thought I'm the only trading with her

    • @jerrypaul2062
      @jerrypaul2062 ปีที่แล้ว

      YOU DON'T NEED TO BE SHOCK BECAUSE I'M ALSO A HUGE BENEFICIARY OF expert MRS JANET

  • @paulc728
    @paulc728 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I’m only here for science corner. It’s always either fascinating or sleep inducing. Love the anticipation.

  • @jadengrant
    @jadengrant ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Friedberg is the only person on this podcast that is not a liar.

    • @Ty-mh7gy
      @Ty-mh7gy ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AnonymousQwerty Jcal is the worst part of the pod, and that's even with scamath

  • @patouwhale
    @patouwhale ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Chamath at minute 25mins is showing a very high level understanding of how the fed influences the economy/asset prices. Super helpful!

  • @jessedart9103
    @jessedart9103 ปีที่แล้ว +102

    JCAL: "Frankly I didn't think we'd make it past 50 episodes"
    Chamath: 3:12 "Well that's because you tried to ruin the pod."
    [Friedberg on the floor] 😂

    • @Mag-us6iz
      @Mag-us6iz ปีที่แล้ว +3

      almost stopped wathcing this bc ic Chamath but I just ignore him

    • @joyalbabu1398
      @joyalbabu1398 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Mag-us6iz Whats wrong with Chamath?

    • @bjarke7886
      @bjarke7886 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@joyalbabu1398 arrogance, pride, gluttony

  • @jacstoneu
    @jacstoneu ปีที่แล้ว +8

    All in pod jumped the shark when they begged to get bailed out

  • @Mark.S.Hamilton
    @Mark.S.Hamilton ปีที่แล้ว +55

    Sacks, I'm not saying depositors should lose their money, I'm saying that govt shouldn't bail out. Apparently your principals don't run that deep after all. Learn from this, make the changes to prevent this in the future.

    • @nickm1727
      @nickm1727 ปีที่แล้ว

      Privatize the profits and socialize the losses. Capitalism isn't working anymore. These banks and investors take massive risk either with bad investments or uninsured deposits, make massive profits, then expect the government to bail them out when it blows up.

  • @Fastbp
    @Fastbp ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Fascinating science corner, keep them coming!

  • @SM-mz1ny
    @SM-mz1ny ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Loved science corner! I could never understand why in past episodes Chamath would say energy and compute could go to zero. Really interesting and exciting!

  • @simonmatar1528
    @simonmatar1528 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Science corner was so good, wish the whole group would show more interest in discussing those topics

  • @shanartisan
    @shanartisan ปีที่แล้ว +15

    "Gimme a bank vault. Why does that service not exist in the world?"
    This is LITERALLY THE REASON Bitcoin was invented.

    • @TrendyContent
      @TrendyContent ปีที่แล้ว +1

      its absurd how they are realizing from first principles why bitcoin was invented

    • @connormote9775
      @connormote9775 ปีที่แล้ว

      They want a bank vault to avoid all risk. I love bitcoin but it's not exactly a risk free asset lol

  • @danharrison
    @danharrison ปีที่แล้ว +66

    KEY STATEMENT by David Friedberg "The Central Bank is just going to be ONE BIG BANK" 🚨 Bingo! Easier to run a national CBDC through, no? Consolidate all other banks into the Central Bank. If you see it, you see it.

    • @giffica
      @giffica ปีที่แล้ว

      Yup sacks is not a republican. He is a liberal. He wants to give away regional power and choice and turn us into China. Classic shill. Should have seen David for what he was.

    • @deefitz2005
      @deefitz2005 ปีที่แล้ว

      It kinda looks like that’s the plan - CBDC

    • @CamLizenby
      @CamLizenby ปีที่แล้ว

      Why?

    • @danharrison
      @danharrison ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CamLizenby Why CBDC, or why does it look like we're heading in that direction?

    • @TmcksnT
      @TmcksnT ปีที่แล้ว

      But they're struggling to create a narrative for doing it

  • @mikestaub
    @mikestaub ปีที่แล้ว +24

    It's obvious now that Friedberg could easily spin out the "Science Corner" section into his own podcast and it would be much better than the "All-In Podcast". I think he is just keeping the band together for his friends, which is admirable in a way. He is the George Harrison of the group.

  • @PavelSumik
    @PavelSumik ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mr. Friedberg surprised me with his knowledge and interest in superconductors and quantum computers, good choice.

  • @asa10142003
    @asa10142003 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    I don’t see venture firms distributing profits to the government when they’re doing really well.

  • @repomannv
    @repomannv ปีที่แล้ว +18

    The first sign that you are "spreading a panic" is that you.... are panicked. Sacks was freaking out, emotionally tweet storming and throwing tantrums over the weekend, issuing threats to the Feds if they didn't step in and bail it out. Not spreading a panic is just stating your opinion, without hysterical emotions, with what you believe will be the outcomes, and what you recommend as corrective actions. The comment that the VC's are the "adults in the room" made me LOL. A person who only cares about their profit and nothing else, is not ever "the adult in the room", rather, they are the person that needs to be put in check by the adult in the room.

  • @juanpablosin7256
    @juanpablosin7256 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Just like Friedburg mentioned, in Argentina we use safe boxes, because we do not want to bear the bank’s counterparty risk. Unfortunately, safe boxes have a cost so effectively, you have to pay money every year if you want to have your savings secured.

  • @bstorm66
    @bstorm66 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Science corner should be 1/4 of the pod. Cool stuff.

    • @daniel24874
      @daniel24874 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agreed! Or a spin off 😂

  • @Yungweezy31
    @Yungweezy31 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    JCal: "no financial interest in the bank"
    ... Except for your mortgage and probably a bunch of money tied up

    • @harrypidd4755
      @harrypidd4755 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If he has a mortgage with them, the bank has a financial interest in JCal, not the other way around.

    • @valireklaam
      @valireklaam ปีที่แล้ว

      portfolio companies were on the line, and his portfolio company Robinhood is robbin the hood. Robinhood Users Cannot Cash Out Their Bets Against SVB. The controversy centers around put options, which allow investors to bet on the decline

  • @orangejuiceproperties
    @orangejuiceproperties ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Happy to see that the Science Corner is back. Very interesting topic on Superconductors. Love how Friedberg explained it.

  • @aceloth
    @aceloth ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Chamath showing leadership by having the courage to outline some possible VC misbehavior at SVB…👍🏽

    • @mickeybeavison1053
      @mickeybeavison1053 ปีที่แล้ว

      You call that courage?! Lmao. All in podcast is trash, these guys are welfare recipients begging for gov handouts while bragging about cashmere sweaters. Pathetic

  • @ericcartmansh
    @ericcartmansh ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Having heard every episode of All In so far my god Friedberg and Chamath are at a seriously higher level of sheer depth and breadth of knowledge. Check out 47:11 - 50:26. 50:26 is the moment Sacks realizes he is in deep waters in this conversation and needs to paddle back

    • @4nxy
      @4nxy ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Friedberg and Chamath are definitely the most knowledgable and Friedberg is probably the wisest of the 4

  • @zp7014
    @zp7014 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Friedberg is so humble and to the point

  • @ahsanmohammed1
    @ahsanmohammed1 ปีที่แล้ว

    18:28
    Thank you for not cutting David off and letting him finish! Appreciated.

  • @makster86
    @makster86 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Always remember that these are 4 multi millionaires/billionaires who have nothing in common with the rest of us. They are smart and entertaining but these guys will always protect their own class first and foremost.

    • @Blue_8800
      @Blue_8800 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And that is common with rest of us :)

  • @BlackAmethyst-XAI
    @BlackAmethyst-XAI ปีที่แล้ว

    I was skipping, through the segment today and absolutely locked in when Friedberg started speaking on the sciencer corner of superconductors. The level of disseminating complex topics into absorbable information for the average individual is phenomenal.

  • @daniel24874
    @daniel24874 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great science corner Friedberg! Best part of the episode. Wish jcal and all showed you more love. 1:23:42

  • @susanwolf3654
    @susanwolf3654 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sacks makes the moat sense in this podcast!PERIOD!!!!People want the trustworthy banks!!!

  • @harrychu650
    @harrychu650 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The correct acronym is SIFI, not SIB. This balance sheet problem is not exclusive to Banks, rather we should presume every public company balance sheet is holding bonds at an unrealized loss. Municipalities are likely also holding these bonds.
    The only viable solution is to cut rates immediately.

  • @simplychaff1875
    @simplychaff1875 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Can’t wait for the besties to distribute their gains to the Fed! So generous! 😍

  • @robinbjoernplatte1822
    @robinbjoernplatte1822 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks friedberg for the science talk! Really appritiate those in depth topics!

  • @JOWELCOLE
    @JOWELCOLE ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Friedberg’s laugh in the background is everything 😂😂😂

  • @mgscheib
    @mgscheib ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If company A has 10 million dollars one would think that some thought would go into where they put that money. As mentioned, regional banks do not have the same regulations as the big banks like WF, BOA, etc. The CFO of any of these companies that park 10mil or any amount over $250k should be well versed in the risk management the regional banks and National banks are held to by the Gov’t. Rather than put their money in a bank that has the controls in place to safe guard their money the Tech industry has placed a premium on wine service and fancy cheeses at the regional banks like SVB. As a result, they rave about service at these regional banks and have zero thought about the risk associated with regional banks.
    I’m just an average Joe who has dreamed of having 10mil dollars to run a business. One of the first thoughts that occur to me when I dream of having that much money, is where to put it so I don’t lose it if the bank goes bankrupt.
    The era of free money continues for the 1% while the common folk continue to flip the bill for these guys. It is the era of free money that promoted the risky behaviors these companies. It’s time for these risky behaviors to be weeded out by letting them fail…..

  • @kurtleimkuehler
    @kurtleimkuehler ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The bailout boys. Good work besty

  • @jo3luttrell
    @jo3luttrell ปีที่แล้ว

    Chamath describing crypto is beautiful. "Different way to solve this problem", "100% transparency", "laws written in code", "tactical real time intelligence".

  • @josevega76
    @josevega76 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    “I have a mortgage on the office with SVB” you notice how he snuck that in there. He didn’t mention that last episode.

    • @mgetommy
      @mgetommy ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@somethingginterestingg4275 sacks at around 27m . I don't think it changes much at all though. He was clear that many of the startups in his portfolio were depositors (as was the norm) which is much more important than his mortgage

    • @josevega76
      @josevega76 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@somethingginterestingg4275 at 23:48 J cal mentions this. In the prior pod, he said he had no exposure to SVB at all. That’s why he non- chalantly mentions it here. I think he got called out on Twitter about it originally.

  • @s.d.crockett486
    @s.d.crockett486 ปีที่แล้ว

    I agree with David Sacks on all of those compounding decisions - great explanation.

  • @timonsmeets387
    @timonsmeets387 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    You guys forget that the average person doesn't have more than 250k at the bank, and thus does not take on any risk.

    • @kylem324
      @kylem324 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      But there are a lot of small businesses/non-profits and the like that could get caught up in these issues and find themselves unable to make payroll. I see it as more of an issue that ends with a bunch of employees that live paycheque to paycheque suddenly having no income.

    • @jaredking31
      @jaredking31 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kylem324 Yes but that's where the first $250k available monday comes in; as well as the first dividend payment. Since the fed/fdic is making stuff up as they go, just prioritize non profits(hospitals, etc) to be made whole first with the dividend payments. Everyone is pretending like Johnny's little league is going to stop because they banked with SVB. If you work for a startup, even the single parent who needs to make their mortgage-you work in an inherently risky sector and your employer did not properly manage risk. Your mortgage is late? Congrats. Pay the $90 fee like the rest of America. They aren't taking your home because your mortgage comes in a week or too late.

    • @kylem324
      @kylem324 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jaredking31 Small business can employ up to 500 employees. When I mention SMB (or just small in this case) I’m explicitly not referring to just tech or startups and talking more globally than just SVB. (Size - Per gov definition)
      Roughly 50% of the workforce is employed by a small business. If the average salary is $50k p/a, any org with 100+ employees is going to struggle to make payroll instantly, let alone any other overhead. And depending on how their cashflow occurs, a lot of their operating capital might be locked up until dividends can be disbursed. Some non profits run with their capital for the year on deposit. And how many SMB’s operate on a net 30-90 schedule? Many people could find themselves in a hole through no fault of their own. They won’t instantly be thrown out of their housing, but these problems could also persist for longer than a few weeks.
      So even an org with only dozens of employees could run into problems within weeks. Or even smaller where there’s a lot of capital needed in procuring either materials or goods.
      My point - there’s lots of places where that $250k doesn’t go very far. And further the liquidating of assets with a haircut to deposits (say 30%) will be greater than the operating margin of most orgs.

    • @einerus
      @einerus ปีที่แล้ว

      But the company hiring that persons have. So here’s the risk for that person.

    • @TheCyclone59
      @TheCyclone59 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@kylem324 that is what's supposed to happen in a recession.

  • @mrlindamandyu405
    @mrlindamandyu405 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Stellar episode, again! 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
    Lol@ JCAPS! 😂
    A legendary Science corner that has me in South Africa thinking about how to get my 6 and 8 yr old boys started on SuperConductors!!
    Thank you folks, you gentlemen give me hope of progress and a bright future that is possible if we all dig in and invest in our respective crafts! #Salute

  • @mothanwrdz
    @mothanwrdz ปีที่แล้ว +51

    Let's blame the regulators WITHOUT mentioning the fact that we have been blaming regulators for over-regulation. 😂😅

    • @YummyFoodOnlyPlz
      @YummyFoodOnlyPlz ปีที่แล้ว

      Both over regulation on nonsensical insignificant areas AND lack of regulation on actually risky practices can be true at the same time. Just sayin'.

  • @ahsanmohammed1
    @ahsanmohammed1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:25:00
    Thank you Sacks for using a good audio system.
    Guys, please use top audio settings. Be nice. Thanks.

  • @epac2816
    @epac2816 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    BITCOIN, THE ANSWER YOU'RE LOOKING FOR IS BITCOIN! 🤦

    • @samyguindy3457
      @samyguindy3457 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Fax Bitcoin for life baby

    • @gibme69420
      @gibme69420 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      self-custody ftw 💪

    • @PrimordialEconomics
      @PrimordialEconomics ปีที่แล้ว

      They all own bitcoin.. ask yourself why they won't talk about it publicly. They want the masses to remain slaves to the corrupt system for as long as possible.

  • @MoChopdat
    @MoChopdat ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Frieberg's physics explanations just blows my mind.

  • @rangarajsrikant3189
    @rangarajsrikant3189 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Friedberg is next level!

  • @rickdias5704
    @rickdias5704 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No one needs to apologize, early signals from the administration and some MSM looked like it was shaping up to be a let the tech bros burn moment. You guys sounded an alarm that letting depositors burn would only lead to contagion. You were right, shouldn't shoot the messengers. WSJ editorial board please haven't been relevant for a long time. The problems are not your podcast or twitter declarations and most intelligent people understand that. Keep doing what you do, we need more public discourse around real issues and less tribal banter.

  • @Redleef607
    @Redleef607 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    KEEP SCIENCE CORNER!

  • @DumbeztGuyInTheRoom
    @DumbeztGuyInTheRoom ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Love the superconductor speech. Can't wait for quantum, RTS, and nuclear.

  • @mimir5782
    @mimir5782 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    They got bailed out, look how happy they can be

  • @tanyawilson2059
    @tanyawilson2059 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I can disagree with some of what is shared on this Podcast,, but I LOVE the information, educating your viewers, different points of view, and the dynamics of the discussions. I LOVE IT, and I thank you for what you provide to the novice.

  • @merrybot101
    @merrybot101 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    awesome episode :) The science corner at the end was a good finish to lift up spirits after the doom and gloom about the economy. Always heard about magnetic trains but was confused why the idea wasn't fully realized/mainstream yet. Didn't know superconductivity was a thing until now. Thanks guys~

  • @victarion1571
    @victarion1571 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    BAILOUT BOYS ARE BACK!

  • @martinlutherkingjr.5582
    @martinlutherkingjr.5582 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    They basically spent an hour describing that they need Bitcoin.

    • @gibme69420
      @gibme69420 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      self-custody ftw 💪

    • @Elliott_Elliott
      @Elliott_Elliott ปีที่แล้ว +2

      But they can't pump & dump it on others like they used to do with their shitcoins

    • @martinlutherkingjr.5582
      @martinlutherkingjr.5582 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@WhyHighC How Bitcoin’s exchange rate for fiat currencies fluctuates is different from how the network is designed to function. Bitcoin is still being traded by wall street finance bros who have programmed their bots to treat it as a risk-on asset.

    • @Elliott_Elliott
      @Elliott_Elliott ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@WhyHighC Which is it now? You said it didn't shoot up, but in the next sentence you write its up. Its literally up by 30% compared to a week ago.

    • @PrimordialEconomics
      @PrimordialEconomics ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This is correct, and you know people this smart are aware of bitcoin. The fact they don't atleast discuss its potential is very suspicious in my opinion.

  • @MsStarbugs
    @MsStarbugs ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Productivity increases are not the right way to solve the problem. If it is right way, we won’t have these problems at all

  • @Ataraxia_Atom
    @Ataraxia_Atom ปีที่แล้ว +18

    SVB def had long term issues but the funniest part is where VCs blew up their own bank for no reason

    • @Ataraxia_Atom
      @Ataraxia_Atom ปีที่แล้ว

      @@POH1222 idk if blowing up SVB is actually beneficial for them. Obviously i have no idea what the VC landscape is but it seems like the bank bent over backwards to service a very specific group of investors. It might have been better for VCs to help SVB out of their situation in the long run but again that's just conjecture maybe there are plenty of other options willing to offer the same terms

  • @nanoblack366
    @nanoblack366 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    People who were trying to understand bitcoin but couldn't quite grasp it before - just got a small dose of it's appeal.

  • @jessstimpert6781
    @jessstimpert6781 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    To be successful in markets, traders should understand the crossover between asset classes & liquidity flow. Julia David focuses on Multi-asset trading, a single strategy to manage risk, profit, and the code or the actual decision-making across multi-asset classes. Her skills set is top notch.

    • @henrysimon7213
      @henrysimon7213 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm surprised you know her too, I've been making a lot of profit investing with her for a few month now.

    • @mellisabakker8524
      @mellisabakker8524 ปีที่แล้ว

      You invest with Julia too? Wow that woman has been a blessing to me and my family.

    • @michaelparas1499
      @michaelparas1499 ปีที่แล้ว

      Julia changed my life because of the high profits I got from investing with her.

    • @marklingard7705
      @marklingard7705 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please how can i get intouch with her, i'm new at this

    • @jessstimpert6781
      @jessstimpert6781 ปีที่แล้ว

  • @seantrumble3291
    @seantrumble3291 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    YAY! Science corner. Fav part of the pod. 👍

  • @AvocadosRus
    @AvocadosRus ปีที่แล้ว +73

    I want the besties to all play CIV or AOE for an episode, I think it would be cool seeing how each one of their civilizations grow

    • @ajwaddanwarr3409
      @ajwaddanwarr3409 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This would have been amazing

    • @kingo55
      @kingo55 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Friedberg would steamroll them all!

    • @omgbaxtergames
      @omgbaxtergames ปีที่แล้ว

      Great idea!

    • @metaverseb
      @metaverseb ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Or Rust

    • @joshuarousson8332
      @joshuarousson8332 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They would need the FED cheat code to give them unlimited gold or you would be watching them reload saved games when they make a mistake

  • @abahub6772
    @abahub6772 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jason, look up Custodia Bank and Caitlin Long. She is a former Wall Street banker who was poised to open a 100% dollar-backed bank (as a Wyoming SPDI) with NO lending and NO interest. The Fed will not allow Custodia to get a Fed Master Account and offer their services widely. There is concern that this kind of bank would suck deposits from traditional banks due to their more secure nature. The rabbit hole goes deep.

  • @njgorham
    @njgorham ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very compelling science corner well done Friedberg 👏

  • @matthewlaw5107
    @matthewlaw5107 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The owner of that poor performing mortgage fund you mention is the FED. Noonel else wants that terrible asset. They buy it by printing currency and that is why all roads are now leading to inflation.

  • @VISIOUSCHERRY
    @VISIOUSCHERRY ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is the most bitcoin episode I’ve ever seen

    • @suicypher
      @suicypher ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Had to scroll way too far to find this. They're essentially describing Bitcoin.

  • @yampipampi
    @yampipampi ปีที่แล้ว

    I did the 12 week MVP course and it was amazing - true to their word - they do charge you upfront to show you are serious but if you do all the coursework they immediately refund you every penny as soon as it's over.
    You get great advice and support from founders who are a bit later in their journeys as well and can guide you through certain challenges.

  • @Brendelson
    @Brendelson ปีที่แล้ว +7

    So do we need to make banking nonprofit? That way they aren’t inclined to use deposits, potentially in risky ways, to make money.

    • @ezyryder11
      @ezyryder11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Credit Unions are cool

  • @mattyice_8608
    @mattyice_8608 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I mean if this doesn't show a use case for decentralized systems like crypto and bitcoin, btc has ripped almost 50% in the last few days

  • @juancarlosmontoya2993
    @juancarlosmontoya2993 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What minute is the part where Sacks congratulates the government for their rapid intervention?

  • @MyVictoriaMarie
    @MyVictoriaMarie ปีที่แล้ว

    I love Science Corner and how detailed his level knowledge is

  • @logicram
    @logicram ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Enjoyed the science corner!

  • @MO-te6kh
    @MO-te6kh ปีที่แล้ว

    Go Friedberg! Thanks for talking more.

  • @curtiscole9027
    @curtiscole9027 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Loved and needed the science break! Friedberg 👍🏻

  • @pettutor4213
    @pettutor4213 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow! This is by far the best discussion I've heard on the crisis and ideas for the future

  • @lydiamadonia8002
    @lydiamadonia8002 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    JC and Sacks are the epitome of “denial”….still promoting their VC fares as though nothing happened and everything is just going back to normal. Truly delusional. Chamath and Friedberg are cautious, alarmed and much more congruent with market conditions. Time to split. I will take a Friedberg podcast any day. I think Chamath contribution to this podcast was poignant, cutting and heartfelt. Chapeu!

    • @3quarter
      @3quarter ปีที่แล้ว

      Does David have his own podcast?

  • @ohkee
    @ohkee ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The piece about superconductors 👍👍👌👌

  • @urxlnc4u
    @urxlnc4u ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Mr Sach's just got enlightenment! Americans don't like the rules of the game being changed after the fact!

  • @georgeb8637
    @georgeb8637 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:09:23 - conductors (for electricity)
    1:10:46 - magnet floats on top of superconductor
    1:11:08 - frictionless trains
    1:11:23 - new micro processors from superconductors (will use 1% of energy of a semi conductor processor)
    1:14:00 - experiments people undertook - to drop it to 0 degrees

  • @MatthewHanover
    @MatthewHanover ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I enjoy the science segments!

  • @paultighe7524
    @paultighe7524 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    these guys love congratulating themselves

  • @anthonymiller3225
    @anthonymiller3225 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Sacks, when you talk about depositors as you do, you neglected to mention FDIC does insure depositors to $250k. And most businesses that deposit more understand cash management so as not to exceed $250k. You can't ignore that is the way the system is supposed to work, and if this limit was respected no one would have cared when SVB went under. There would not have been a panic. The bank may have still been insolvent but there would not have been a run.

    • @uzah88
      @uzah88 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Correct

    • @hulkingmass
      @hulkingmass ปีที่แล้ว

      I have two accounts for this exact reason. If these guys are the most sophisticated operators in the market, then why did I think to do this and not them? The reality is they knew that was prudent, but this bank gives them kickbacks to tell their founders they have to bank there.
      This was their mistake, their risk. If you are a depositor exceeding the insured amount you are an investor. They deserved to lose their money. BUT, I agreed that the bailout needed to happen.
      In light of this, though, my real problem was how Jason and Sacks handled this. They stoked fear of general bank runs without being clear that $250k is insured. They insulted and mocked the government for not doing something they were in the process of doing. And a reasonable person should believe they did this to protect their books and their friends' books by trying to increase the risk of the regulators not bailing them out by stoking lack of faith in both banking and government.
      And then to top it all off, they now act like tweeting this stuff was to sound the alarm to regulators. Which is so idiotic I don't even need to go into it. Some of the most shameless and embarrassing behavior I have ever seen.

  • @gabb05
    @gabb05 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    wasn't credit suisse offering chamath 6.5% a couple episodes ago (E:118)? lol, now we know why....on another note though, Chamath nailed it in E118 @the 44:00min mark where he talks about the quality of earnings. Cashflow vs balance sheet accounting to present more profit (aka, the bond crisis we're seeing)

  • @joepham7359
    @joepham7359 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You guys need to bring in Caitlin Long from Custodia Bank as a guest re: the banking model with full reserves.

  • @bullcity76
    @bullcity76 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I would to hear you guys talk about the future of banking and fintech. Personal and commercial applications. We are experiencing the biggest disruption and opportunity in this space!