Degree of Kinematic Indeterminacy of Beams Neglecting Axial deformation

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.พ. 2025
  • Concept of Kinematic indeterminacy / Degree of Freedom & Problems on Degree of Kinematic indeterminacy of Beams Neglecting Axial Deformation [ HINDI ] Structural analysis - 2
    Indeterminacy Of Structures Complete Playlist:- • Concept of Degree Of S...
    SA-2 Playlist:- • UNIT LOAD METHOD | Vir...
    Visit My Website For Notes, Lectures, and Books PDF
    Link:- www.engineerin...
    #Degree_Of_Kinematic_Indeterminacy
    #Kinematic_Indeterminacy_of_Beams
    #StructuralAnalysis2
    #StructuralAnalysis2VideoLecture
    #StructuralAnalysis2Tutorial

ความคิดเห็น • 45

  • @vaibhavgoswami7756
    @vaibhavgoswami7756 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    very very accurate. my whole cioncept is clear now. thanks brother.

  • @manishghag7630
    @manishghag7630 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Helpful for engineering students

  • @somashiva2831
    @somashiva2831 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tnq Soo much bro....nice information.....👏👌👍

  • @ojasagwekar2081
    @ojasagwekar2081 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Degrees of freedom are the possible ways by which a rigid joint would move(i.e. either translation or rotation or both).
    For fixed support, there are three reactions available viz. 2 translation and 1 rotational. Thus, the degree of freedom is zero.
    For hinge support, there are two reactions available viz. both translation and there is not rotation allowed. Thus the degree of freedom is 1(i.e. 1 rotation).
    For roller support, there is only one reaction normal to the surface over which the roller rests reactions. Thus, the degree of freedom is 2(i.e. 1 rotation and 1 translation).
    For an internal hinge, there are 4 degrees of freedom available(i.e 2 translations and 2 rotations).
    For a 2 dimension rigid joint or free end, the number degree of freedom at a joint is 3 (one rotation
    and 2 translations).
    CAD means considering axial deformation.
    NAD means neglecting axial deformation.
    For calculating the Degree of kinematic indeterminacy by considering axial deformation by using the degrees of freedom, then first observe the entire structure and then add the degrees of freedom depending upon the constraints in the structure(viz. fixed support, hinge support, roller support, rigid joint or any internal hinge).
    For example, if a beam has one fixed support, one internal roller and hinge support, and an overhang over the hinge, then the Degree of kinematic indeterminacy by considering axial
    deformation by using the degrees of freedom is DIK=0(fixed support) + 2(roller) + 1(hinge) + 3(overhang= free end) = 6.
    For calculating the Degree of kinematic indeterminacy by neglecting axial deformation(NAD) is DIK(NAD) = DIK(CAD)-number of members in the structure.
    In the above example of the beam, there are three members viz first from the fixed support to the internal roller, second from the internal roller to the hinge support and the third is the overhang. Thus, the DIK(NAD)=6-3=3.
    The formula for calculating the Degree of kinematic indeterminacy by considering axial deformation is DIK=3*J-R+I.
    Here, J=number of joints in the structure including any internal hinge.
    R= number of reactions actually acting on the structure.
    I= number of internal hinges.
    There is no such formula as what Mr. Ganesh had mentioned in the above video for calculating the degree of freedom by neglecting axial deformation(NAD.

    • @Ish392s
      @Ish392s 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You may be correct. But there are some question asked in the gate and ese. Which is accurate with this formula.

  • @tahermodi2780
    @tahermodi2780 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellently explained all concepts 👍👍

  • @tiktokforever1621
    @tiktokforever1621 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bhai bahut badiyaa main nepal se huh...

  • @reshmashaik8636
    @reshmashaik8636 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good teaching

  • @naresharjun9992
    @naresharjun9992 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If internal hinge is supported by 3 members in that case no.of moments are exists.

  • @erprasadthakare1361
    @erprasadthakare1361 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks to give easy tricks

  • @Athrav1512
    @Athrav1512 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir why you have not considered free end as a joint ?

  • @er.saravanarajayogeswaran8167
    @er.saravanarajayogeswaran8167 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tq Sir continue your videos

  • @vandanabhaskar1036
    @vandanabhaskar1036 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awsome trick sir

  • @sgulnar4681
    @sgulnar4681 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir 3 beams wale problem mein dk=5 hoga not 6 because at join only 1 rotation will be there if axial deformation is neglected but you have consider 2( vertical displacement and rotation).final answer is dk=1+1+3(i.e., at hinge , at joint, at internal hinge)

    • @sgulnar4681
      @sgulnar4681 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If i am correct please reply anyone

    • @yashasvisingh5259
      @yashasvisingh5259 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sgulnar4681 yes I've got the same answer...............and have the same confusion.

  • @indrajeetupadhyay6759
    @indrajeetupadhyay6759 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much sir jee

  • @shivamsharanlall672
    @shivamsharanlall672 ปีที่แล้ว

    10:36 it is a frame.
    So nk= 3j- r- m +A

  • @iampremium1619
    @iampremium1619 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    bro Degree of freedom to nehin ayega axially rigid hoga to but reaction kyun neglect kar rahe ho?

  • @raviranjan-lc3hb
    @raviranjan-lc3hb 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks bro :)

    • @GaneshShegar
      @GaneshShegar  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Check the Playlist of SA-2 For More Videos ( Link in the Description Box )

  • @Allinone-hf5uu
    @Allinone-hf5uu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One joint - 3 DOF

  • @Maru_entertainment
    @Maru_entertainment 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir

  • @souravroy7253
    @souravroy7253 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir when we have to use 2j-r+A and 3j-r+A if only Dk find out karnr bola to?

    • @dishaldatta3375
      @dishaldatta3375 ปีที่แล้ว

      Use 3j ! If it is asked axial def neglected or beams are inextensible only then use 2j

  • @amartyarandive6078
    @amartyarandive6078 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    19.:50 vertical kaise ayega, sirf rotation ayega na horizontal aur vertical ko fired hai

  • @lekhav5250
    @lekhav5250 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir in a question it is given that beam is subjected to transverse loading is there a need to neglect axial deformation or not for static indeterminacy and kinetic indeterminacy
    pls reply sir

  • @nandinivasaikar3239
    @nandinivasaikar3239 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If one end is free then how to solve it??

  • @prashanjitdhali
    @prashanjitdhali 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bhai degree of freedom (axially) ko neglect karna hai na . Lekin hamne toh reaction ko neglect kar diya.
    Confusion dur karo bhai.
    Ya fir questions me degree of freedom axially ko neglect karne bola to axially REACTION bhi automatically neglect hota hai kya ?

  • @abhishekgangan2252
    @abhishekgangan2252 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir internal hinge joint pe ata h kya

    • @GaneshShegar
      @GaneshShegar  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haa.. internal Hing should be considered as joint while Calculating Total no. Of Joints ( J )

    • @ankushkagial1471
      @ankushkagial1471 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GaneshShegar sir static interminancy me internal hinge ko joint consider Ni krte Kya??

  • @factstar2477
    @factstar2477 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤❤❤❤❤

  • @rohittonagariya2632
    @rohittonagariya2632 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir koi esko 3J-R-m se bhi solve krte hai wo sahi hai kya

  • @ndansari7869
    @ndansari7869 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just formula is enough

  • @sarlaverma1506
    @sarlaverma1506 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Kya karwaya ..pura confused kar diya ..
    Clear samjh nhi aaya

  • @shubhamhatwar1465
    @shubhamhatwar1465 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir wrong hai....

  • @Allinone-hf5uu
    @Allinone-hf5uu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Confusing

  • @priyankakumawat2079
    @priyankakumawat2079 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Answer wrong ho rahe hai sir

    • @GaneshShegar
      @GaneshShegar  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You might be doing wrong, Plz re check

    • @priyankakumawat2079
      @priyankakumawat2079 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      App 2*3-3+1=4 aa raha hai....which is right

  • @onlinepg4066
    @onlinepg4066 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seems to be wrong

  • @shashank_d_a
    @shashank_d_a 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir