CBS News Investigative Correspondent Sharyl Attkisson asked Dr. Andrew Wakefield about the controversy surrounding his study on vaccinated and unvaccinated animals.
As a Paramedic a few years ago I attended 2 vax injured patients on the same day. One a 6 year old boy who had developed hydrocephalus and epilepsy and also an 80 yr old lady, slim, fit previously playing golf who became virtually bed ridden with sores in her mouth and pain in her abdomen and private parts. Heart breaking
@Sam Yaza I thought this shit what we r in right now is a new shit .. I have to admit .. I was wrong! This shit is not new .. just a renewable one. We should consider to clear all of this "drugmaffia"'s freelance out from our history for ever!
He moved more anti vaccine to help his grift but of course at this point he wasn't against all vaccines. Part of his scam was that he was developing his own vaccine (and also a therapeutic) when his fraudulent study was demonizing the current one.
@@jasonbolding3481 is obviously a paid Pharma shill by his many comments here. Yes they pay people to troll and post their lying deceptive comments. The only scammer here is Jason. Ironically Scammer Jason is working for the same people who develop hundreds of vaccines and try to get them on the childhood schedule so they can make millions and billions more. Is Scammer Jason for or against vaccines???
He was against giving babies and children a huge viral load of multiple shots over and over that overwhelms a tiny system. He also found research they omitted when presenting research that left out how it was engineered to specifically target, or have the worst effect, on black male babies and children. If you can find the docu, The Silent Epidemic, it goes into detail and presents solid evidence. These are crimes against humanity, not medicine.
Wow, this is obviously pre-2016, when CBS was still an objective reporter of the news. I bet you nobody in CBS today will interview Dr. Wakefield nor Dr. Brian Hooker in this respectful manner ever again. The gloves of friendly fascism are off, its now the iron fist. They are playing the long game here people and at the expense of our children, we have to take a stand.
I noticed the same thing too, all across medias. CNN used to report real news too and do investigative journalism. So did CBC in Canada. I came across a health article saying that flu stats were way over inflated and based on faulty models (hmm faulty models that get the world to overreact, sounds familiar). You would never see an article like that anymore, because it's obvious that over inflating flu and flu deaths is a great fear incentive to get people to get that flu vax that barely works.
@@saintejeannedarc9460 Indeed, part of it is because in the 1980s on CBS we had people like Bill Moyers who would investigate the evil and corrupt CIA. In 1977 the New York Times reported a piece on the global propaganda network the CIA had, but today they are actually invited on TV as pundits. Hahaha, here is a guy who is a spook, he is taught to social engineer and he gets invited on a news network to give his opinion. Lets invite a wolf into the farm to speak on what we should do with the henhouse. They are out of control and out of order.
While Wakefield has the right to defend his view, I am concluding most of the people on here, including you are taking this 2009 interview and using it as availability heuristics to make conclusions about the COVID-19 vaccine. To be honest, why would CBS want to interview a disgraced researcher who has a history of siding with the anti-vaccine people? Also, most people didn't even read his study. I did. What he is telling the truth on from that interview is that it is about interpretation. He states that the report did not say it proves MMR vaccine causes Autism Spectrum. That part is TRUE. It does not say that. However, what he failed to mention was in the study it does in fact say that they found over 50% of the children (sample of 12), were observed with bowl and other digestive issues, and later were observed having behavioral issues after taking the MMR vaccine. And we now know Wakefield is an anti-vaccine advocate. And since not one person has been able to replicate his findings, we have to conclude Wakefield committed researcher bias.
@@christophergreen4616 Ridiculous conclusion. I read his research paper as well. I also studied nutrition, which has a special emphasis on gut health, so I immediately recognized his conclusions about gut flora in some made them extra susceptible to the MMR vaccine. He in no way fudged his data. Pharma is extremely powerful. His study was peer reviewed and accepted by the Lancet, which is pretty much the gold standard of medical journals. His peers understood what a hot potato taking on big pharma was and questioning their haloed vaccines. I'm not going to get into how bizarre I find vax worshipers, the true believers who seem to make a religion out of a brilliant on the one hand medical technology, but also excessively dangerous when it goes wrong medical therapy, to which one size is supposed to fit all. And the damn things are mandated and forced on people in ever increasing amounts. Some of us have some sense and perspective on how reckless and unrealiistic that is. Yet you mention anit vaccine people like it's a hex, the most insulting thing a person could be. It's like a spell or a religion really. Most of us that rightly, realistically question vaccines (and some far more than others, such as the extra risky MMR) we want vaccine choice first off, but we want much higher standards of vaccine safety. Pharma is deadly dangerous and will stop at nothing to keep its profits as high as possible. Its baffling the only conclusion you can draw is the Wekefield was wrong, not the pharma IS Wrong and their vax is dangerous. Why did no one replicate the study? How naive. They made an example out of his. He was top of his field, had won awards, and now he had his license stripped. All for trying to help horrifically vaccine damaged kids and their desperate families.
@@christophergreen4616 1. A 'disgraced researcher who has a history if siding with the anti-vaxxers'? DID you ;listen' to ANYTHING AW said in this interview? Clearly you cant of!! 2. ALL of those children DID have an adverse and chronic reaction almost immediately after receiving the MMR vaccine. FACT! It was the parents of those poor kids that approached AW asking him for help. 3. You repeat this obsurd and intentional flse statement again, claiming AW is an 'anti-vaxxer'. WHERE in this clip does AW even remotely suggest taking such a stance? I mean, if I missed it? then SHOW ME?? ):
Anti-Vaxxers keep referencing Andrew Wakefield as someone who is Anti-Vaccine but from this interview, he seems to be pro-vaccine since his children are vaccinated and reccomends vaccines but not all three at once?
His position on vaccination changed gradually over a period of years, partly due to his further research on MMR and autism, but mainly due to hearing the accounts of many parents describing their children's vaccine injuries. He also continued studying the history of measles and the history and effects of the measles vaccine. It used to be that you could watch a brilliant presentation he did on measles and the measles vaccine, on youtube, but that video seems to have been censored.
Nah. Just here to get ammo to go back to work and debate with an antivax wackjob coworker of mine. Can't really debate effectively if you don't understand where the opponent is coming from. With as many studies as there are that have proven there is no correlation with vaccines and autism holding onto this one that does seems pretty desperate and naive, especially when the dude who authored it plainly states the authors who redacted their statements wanted to redact the misguided assumption that vaccines cause autism. People will believe what they want to believe. Look at how many people believe the earth is flat today, kinda the same thought process. I'm not even saying vaccines are 100% great for you either as many chemicals and shit that are in them I'm sure they're probably at least mildly harmful (assuming you get them constantly which we don't really) but there is no proof that they cause autism.
@@Myth0x2 LOL, that's an appropriate handle. Most parents become pro medical choice after they or their child becomes ill or in some case dies. Did you even listen to the interview? The Pharmaceutical industry immediately went after him instead of doing actual research and true safety studies. There are NO double blind placebo studies because the vaccines are not safe. There is too much money at stake. Now we have a huge amount of fear mongering regarding simple childhood illnesses. We are destroying the health of our younger generations to fill the pocketbooks of the Pharmaceutical companies. Also, we give around 72 doses by the time a child is 18. That's more than a little excessive. I was very ill after my last Tetanus which turned out to be a TDap and I was not told this. I only found out later when a nonmedical person said they do not make a separate Tetanus anymore. I had definite memory problems for awhile and my sometimes asthma became a full-time issue. If vaccines are so great then the vaccinated have nothing to fear from the unvaccinated. Hey, have you caught yourself up to the childhood schedule. If not you could be considered unvaccinated.😁
@@tlraffaele there have actually been multiple studies trying to replicate his findings to no avail which disproved time and again that he falsified his information. And the fear mongering is coming from people like you who are saying these things are literally going to die or have serious developmental deficiencies if they don't take your stance. I'm not trying to defend the pharmaceutical industry here. I fee like they're just as corrupt as any other mega corporation entity, all I'm saying is this study is filled with holes and misnomers. Even the coauthors on this study withdrew themselves from the statement that the vaccines cause autism, he literally says that in this video
@@Myth0x2 Did you actually watch the video? It wasn't a study, it was a small group of children. They definitely had developed diagnosible health issue following the MMR. Having witnessed this in the children of friends I absolutely believe the MMR triggers this. Wakefield gave very reasonable recommendations that got him targeted. He did not go ballistic and say we shouldn't vaccinate at all, he just said there appears to be an issue with this combo vaccine that needs further study. The fear mongering comes from those who seem to think it was some miracle that humans continued to exist before vaccines. My children were fully vaccinated. They both have eczema problems, one has asthma and the other could not eat fresh fruit till she was in her mid 20's. The older one developed Steven Johnson Syndrome(very scary, look it up) in High School. She is only around today because by then I had embraced alternative healing. The Docs had no clue at all and gave her steroids that didn't help. That was our last visit to a conventional Doctor for that. When you can show me true double blind placebo studies that show vaccines are safe let me know. Good luck, they don't exist. What they do is test the vaccine with and without the antigen. Meaning the shots without the antigen still contain all the other ingredients like aluminum, formaldehyde, bovine serum, aborted fetal DNA. This is not a true safety test.
@@tlraffaele considering it was scientific research done by a group of doctors that was then published in a scientific journal (even though it has now been discredited) I'm going to call it a study. Feel free to call it whatever you would like the verbiage of it is trivial and not really the point. Something I think we should remember is correlation does not always equal causation, if you google "spurious correlations" there's a website that does a fairly good and kind of comical explanation of this with a few data points over some different graphs. Living systems are so complicated it's often difficult to pinpoint one thing as being the definite cause of a problem, usually there are multiple factors at play. Right now people are jumping to vaccines because it seems like a convenient answer and they're just relying on this one study to assert those claims. It would be like blaming the cleaning company's staff for things that go missing in your office when in reality a coworker forgot to return an item, and all of this is based off of another coworker's rumors at the water cooler. And if you really want to argue about the effectiveness of modern medicine compared to what we had prior I feel like you'll be fighting an uphill battle. Things like polio, mumps, smallpox, rabies, tetanus, any bacterial infection were all serious threats to life before we had measured against them, usually in the form of vaccinations (excluding bacterial infections I was mainly referring to antibiotics there). My frustrations with this issue is there are now large amounts of people going against centuries (the first successful vaccine was for smallpox in 1798) of scientific advancement because of one person's misguided claims. The fact that people blame every ailment they or someone they know has on it being the vaccine's fault also just reiterates they understand very little about how biological systems work. Like I said earlier saying something is definitely being caused by something else is a pretty serious statement that takes evidence beyond a reasonable doubt which as of now has not been produced.
@@misterauctor7353 I suggest you go and have a wee chat with the parents recorded in the films Vaxxed and Vaxxed 11. I think you'll find that they strongly dis-agree with your 'certainty in what you claim. (:
@@misterauctor7353 Correct! It does'nt have 'your' science' in it, but has a certain type of science that most people prefer to believe, ie, The TRUTH.(NOT the science that 'bought' scientists spout) (:
@@JfK--OBJECTivE Roflmfaaaao. Oh really? Oh and I suppose you include yourself in this class of 'intelligent/sensible' people yes?lolol. The intelligent'sensible people 'listen,especially to people who do NOT have a personal agenda,ie, those who stand to make a frigging fortune on the products that they produce. DUH
I vaccinated ( MMR ) my son when he was 15 months old in the year 2010 . A super active sharp normal kid started behaving odd . At first we didn't understand then doctors confirmed autism . We were shocked . We analysed all possible reasons and narrowed down to the time of his behaviour difference and found out it was after just a couple of days after MMR vaccination . If only i have seen or heard of Dr. Wakefield's findings we could have well avoided this . I am from deep south India Tamilnad . Since then i started to spread the news .
@Kinga European Orthopedic Shoes for Kids and Women That cure isn't made available to us ( since they're in denial what would you expect! , all these media rubbish to serve one purpose "to fool us and diminish their responsibilities ") unfortunately even if that's the case it's too late for my child he is 10yrs now , but thanks for the info maybe some child in that age could benefit from it .
First, that is YOUR fault and your BREEDING partners' fault that you have a kid. Breeding is MURDER. YOUR choice to murder your kid, to force suffering onto your kid. Secondly, YOU HAVE NO PROOF of what causes your kids' reactions. YOU are not a scientist doing RESEARCH in the field of physiology & virology. You just blame a vaccine for your kids' kills because that's an EASY target.
I had a debate with someone on this and they treated me as if I was stupid. I asked how these various things naturally enter the human environment and how they spread. He couldn't say. But..... If polio was erradicated( I was screamed this by a medical student) why do we still vaccinate for it? You are literally shooting polio into your system along with any number of different things. That you can contract, spread, and have a reaction from.
@@OfftoShambala to say there's a cure for something is to say you've figured out the needed environment in order for polio to even sustain itself. So then the question is how do you naturally get polio. Then you'd have to explain to me the risks of NATURAL spread in the human populis. My point is that people like to claim that vaccines have eradicated polio when by proxy that can't possibly be true. If it were there would be no samples to mass produce a vaccine, nor a reason to continue to vaccinate for it. Anyway you want to slice it vaccines are useless and always have been.
Vivian Woods apparently, most kids, around 99%, who contracted polio didn’t even know they had had it! Their parents thought their kids had just had a bad cold. As for the pictures of kids laying in those hideous machines, all lined up, was completely false also amhistory.si.edu/polio/historicalphotos/index.htm
@@wazz1154 hell this very first vaccines in were forced onto a small town where the children were dying 3x more from it rather than the illness itself. No one wanted it and it was eventually let go of until they had a bigger propaganda machine in order to trick people into it.
Unfortunately I found out about all of this too late. Now? my g.son is 6 years old and is autistic! Yeah and I am grieving daily now thinking, if only! (:
@@misterauctor7353 Oh really? Well go and tell that to all the parents who's children were 'co-incidentlly' and profoundly damaged practically immediately after receiving that MMR vaccine and lets see what THEY have to say to your silly and ignorant words. (:
I appreciate CBS News being willing to give Wakefield a voice to defend the charges "at that time". However, what many, many people fail to recall is that 12 co-authors were with Wakefield on this study. Also, the main issue that got Wakefield into trouble was not his "interpretation" rebuttal. That rebuttal is solid because the original article does say their findings does not prove MMR vaccine could cause Autism Spectrum. What got him in trouble was not one research study was able to replicate his results. And why in the world would 12 other researchers recant the whole study if they believed it was true legit science? In science, replication is very important. If other researchers can replicate your results, that makes your case even stronger for the need to look into the effects of the MMR vaccine and a possible link to Autism Spectrum. When a researcher gets different results using different samples or a change in methodology, that's not bad and the original author can be honest and admit their theory has flaws. But, when no one can replicate your results, and other researcher mimic every procedure to the tee, and used a sample of children with the same symptoms; that's a red flag. Wakefield claimed in his observations of the children, over 50% of the children's bowl and other digestive issues and future onset of behavioral issues were observed weeks after taking the MMR vaccine. He suggests a possible association between MMR vaccine and Autism Spectrum and other possible behavioral issues. The average layperson with no experience in research science will obviously interpret that as a legit concern. So, I don't blame the global concern. But, what I don't get is why still, a lot of people don't see some had to had ran foul in the methodology, or the data findings. Something like this should had been able to be replicated. That's what got Wakefield in trouble.
This was a case study. He and his co-authors were not testing an hypothesis. There has been no true attempt to replicate the findings of this study, but many studies since 1998 have shown the gut brain connection supporting the findings of the Wakefield Walker-Smith study. What got him into trouble was that he found that the safety testing of the MMR vaccine was horribly inadequate and, after the case study began, he agreed to testify as an expert witness on behalf of plaintiffs suing Merck, the maker of the MMR vaccine, because he saw how inadequate the safety testing had been. He was a David who went up against the Goliath pharma industrial complex and he was too naive to see it at the time. Rupert Murdoch a media giant had a son who was appointed to the board of Merck. Murdoch was the employer of Bryan Deer, the journalist who triggered and perpetuated the smear campaign after the study had been peer reviewed and published. There were no scientists or doctors who found fault with the study until that campaign was under way. People do not understand the depth of corruption in the scientific, media and medical industrial complexes and the lengths to which they will go to protect their product.
@@cwassellful Everything you have written there is complete and utter nonsense. Wakefield is and always has been a scam artist. There was no finding in that paper, the parents were all brough to him by a lawyer. The Royal Free told him that they would find a proper research study and would give him all the tools at their disposal in order to do so. He refused. It's obvious why. He was struck off because he falsified records and ignored datat that went against his hypothesis. Frankly, he, and anyone who supports him, can needs to fuck off.
@@jasonbolding3481 Charlatans or not their case studies make interesting reading and their cancer cures in the thousands. However, it is important to take plenty of anti-biotics regardless of WHO guidelines insist that you want them to your doctor. Make sure you get doubly or quadruple vaccinated don’t worry about adjuvants, aldehydes and Mercury it’s all irrelevant and of no consequence. Get, lots of x-ray scans every month and MRI to make sure all is well the x-ray level is not any issue. Finally don’t bother reading the side effects listing info sheet which comes with medicines. 100 000 people dying every year from dr prescribed medicine in the USA alone high lighted by the FDA is also just a number.
BS! A person/parent can ONLY make an informed decision/choice, when ALL the literature,information is being provided. Clearly, from the evidence, the pharma industry is being 'convenient' with the truth,facts when giving that info on the vaccines that THEY say are safe.
Unethical behavior and professional misconduct. His paper altered data, he failed to disclose major conflicts of interest like recruiting his subject through a vaccine litigation law firm, and to qoute the medical board "showed callous disregard for any distress or pain the children might suffer" in preforming unneeded invasive test .Among other things
@@jasonbolding3481 you should read his book because he goes into detail about each of those allegations and shows how they were falsified and used to assassinate his career because he touched MMR.
I support vaccination. However, everything human made is not perfect and can be improved on, especially medicine. So rather than crucifying scientists/researchers for questioning the establishment, we should engage with their investigation and support the minds of our brightest people. I don't think Dr. Wakefield published his findings to harm the world, but rather to help create safer medicine.
He faked his research for profit. The profit of the amti vaccine law firm he was working with, the profit of the alternative vaccine he was devolping and the profit of the sham test kit he was designing. Not for safety
@@jasonbolding3481 This is incorrect. You are repeating talking points from a smear campaign developed and perpetuated by people who sat on the board of the drug company which had a lot to lose if people realized how dangerous their product was. You are either a victim of propaganda, or you are one of an unbelievable number of trolls who are incentivized to perpetuate misinformation to keep this lie going. If you are the latter, then there's nothing to do about it; you already know what you are doing and saying is wrong. If you are the former, and would like to begin to understand what really happened, rather than just blindly believing special interest groups who have no problem harming millions of children for life, you can watch his interview with Del Bigtree on the Highwire.
@@1wannabee1 It certainly is not a lie and they are the very reasons he was struck off. He was raising parents in the background, he was working with lawyers who stood to make money from government funded legal aid win or lose. This is all in the public domain, mate.
Japan investigated the MMR, and refuse to give it to their population; it they need a vaccine for mumps, measles or rhubella (sp?) they will use the individual vaccines but not the MMR!
Well said Margaret. This mans only crime? was 'caring' for children who's parents concerns were NOT being listened to and they looked to Andrew for help ,to which he did not refuse. What I say is, go and ask them parents what they think of Andrew Wakefield!! (tis THEY who are having to pick up the pieces and the damage that has been done to those poor children NOT the big pharmacutical companies who btw, are immune from prosectution regarding any claim of damages done to the people who receive their vacines!
@@1wannabee1 he cared for the children a lot in fact! So much he fucking abused them. For example, doing a colonoscopy on a five year old child while not detailing the risks. They found nothing, and that child's intestines were punctured in the procedure and had to fight for his life.
@@misterauctor7353 You what? You sit there and have the brass neck to insinuate that AW is a 'liar'? How DARE you be sooo ignorant. I have read some stoopid,naive comments in my time but you have just taken them attributes to a new level.1. It has been 'proved' that big pharma have 'lied', altered data AND even destroyed documents to evade incrimination. 2. Big pharma have 'lied' to the medical profession for YEARS! FACT. 3. Fyi? the whistle-blower, (who worked for the CDC btw) has been requested by the Senate in the US by a congressman to be ;invited; to speak in the house so that he can reveal what he knows. Now guess what? That request was made some time ago now and as of yet? that man STILL has not been 'called'. Now I want you to be totally honest with yourself here and ask just why that is? think! WHY has that man NOT been called to speak? (NO need to phone a friend me thinks for the answer to that question) (:
Lez Hulse Of course a person such as yourself who believes in the falsified research of a man who no longer has a medical license would also spell “right” as “write
@@viktoriialomonosova1715 he spelled "write" correctly, which causes me to suspect that English simply isn't his first language. A mistake of this kind is easy to make, even for native speakers. It does not denote a lack of intelligence.
@@viktoriialomonosova1715 I dont give a monkeys how Lez's grammar is. They are 'right' and thats it,(try and concentrate on the 'content' rather than the presentation please) (:
I want to nominate Dr. Wakefield for my imaginary but tremendously prestigious "Empathy for Humanity" Award. The biggest Trophy and 10 lb Gold Metal goes with the recognition of his life long efforts to save our children from Vaccine damage.
I second that, UpNorthOfThe49th. How extraordinarily sad that we are dealing with the same medical tyranny in 2020 as that which allowed herbalists and midwives to be branded as witches and burned at the stake! Nothing has changed. In fact, it has become worse. It is only because of brave, dedicated human beings like Dr. Wakefield, Dr. Mikovits, Dr. William Thompson who consider the truth to be greater than their personal freedoms that we have any hope.
@@Navillus2273 Obviously you haven't seen Vaxxed and Vaxxed II, or obviously you work for the pharmaceutical industry, or obviously you're just an evil bastard. No, you are the idiot. I know what vaccines can do first hand, and it isn't pretty. So be sure you stay updated on all of your vaccines, because you deserve it with that kind of an attitude.
I would like to make a blog about this, but i don`t understand what he is saying about ''the vioxx tral in Australia, and there quotes'' Can someone please clear that up? What is the Violl trial?? There is a newspaper called the Viox, and there are more related names.. English is not my best language
Sebastiaan Baan Vioxx was the most common marketing name for the anti-inflammatory medication Rofecoxib. It was removed from the market in 2004, after multiple studies showing it was unsafe...with some estimates it contributed to ~50,000 deaths. You can read Wikipedia’s interpretation on it. Whoever wrote it.
@@jasonbolding3481 his senior partner in the study was recently exonerated and his license to practice restored, the court excoriated the medical panel for their fraud and lack of evidence against the team. That Dr had since retired anyway but his honour has been restored. Since the same fake evidence was used against Dr Wakefield it is reasonable to expect the same result. He's a far better man than most in the industry. Filmaker and exProducer of the TV series Doctors and VAXXED Del Bigtree said many doctors tell him they know vaccines cause autism but they don't want to be Wakefielded.
@@NathanEllery incorrect, His partner was not exonerated. The judge actually said if he was conducting research , as you imply he was by with the connection to mr Wakefield, he was guilty of misconduct . The ruling was abput methodology and wether the board probably handle the question of wether Walker-Smith was was undertaking research in the guise of clinical investigation or wether the interventions were clinically indicated. Nothing to do with Mr.Wakefield's fraud, which is why Mr. Wakefield also did not appeal
Less then a year before his controversial paper came out, Wakefield released a patent for a measles vaccine. So Wakefield patents a measles vaccine. Then he conducts a study, and is told by some of the parents, "I think the first time I remember seeing symptoms of autism in my child was after the MMR vaccine." Apparently this must be reported on because untrained people kinda thought maybe a thing could have happened, and that's important scientific information. If some of them had said, "I think the first time I remember my child having symptoms of autism was shortly after fairies all sprinkled them with pixie dust," it apparently would've been scientifically relevant to report that. Then Wakefield goes on a crusade to convince parents that MMR will screw up their kids, but separate vaccines for these things (like Wakefield's) are totally cool. All in the interest of saving the children, of course.
@@vaibhavigupta438 Especially considering the signs of autism don't really show until the age when we start vaccinating children. This guy is supposed to be a scientist and completely forgot that _some_ correlation is not causation. But I guess when you want to sell your measles vaccine you just conveniently forget about that kind of thing.
Yes, it's good CBS News AT THAT TIME gave Wakefield his chance to give his side. Have you read the infamous retracted study? I did. While he is correct that he said their findings does not prove MMR vaccine causes Autism. The article does say over 50% of the children with the stomach and digestive issues who are later observed to experience behavioral issues a short period after taking the MMR vaccine. The real problem that got Wakefield in trouble stems from an important element of research science. Replication. Even with him saying his study should be an important discussion trigger on MMR vaccine, not one researcher was able to replicate his findings. What many people also fail to remember is there were 12 other authors on this study. Why would 12 authors retract and recant the study if it was methodologically sound? Something had to be a miss. And why is it that still today-----no one researcher has been able to replicate Wakefield's findings?
@@Whizzy-jx3qe they needed to make an example of AW to show others in the future who might think of doing the same as him! (psst! its called corruption at its finest) (:
Um, yeah no. This is misinformation. He was researching the component of colostrum in breastmilk that provides immune protection to certain childhood diseases. He was not developing his own vaccine.
And what vaccine was that? He's not against vaccines, he us against multiple vaccines in one injection. He believes this hasn't been scrutinised enough. I'd trust him over the pharma industry any day.
@@annettajensen6751 you trust the disgraced ex dr. with a financial incentive, who lied in his study, abused children, and cosigned a patent with a man who thinks his personal bone marrow can cure cancer? Bold.
@@drywall1873 Correct on the latter; incorrect on the former. He was developing a patent for a treatment utilizing colostrum for kids who could not take the measles vaccine. Yes, it is correct that he did not advise anyone to not be vaccinated, he just recommended that parents request the single (non-multivalent) vaccine.
Please look into the CDC meeting held in Feb you can find the channel on TH-cam... they have presented that in 2017/18 approx 10 million people from the US were admitted to hospital by summer for influenza related illnesses; so far in the US there are approximately 7 million people that have been admitted and we are in April! With the amount of people diagnosed with 'Covid-19' who don't actually have it, I wouldn't really be surprised if the hospitalisations by summer reach above that 10 million mark. My question is, why did the WHO not push for an influenza vaccine during the year 2017/18?
Its quite funny that,here in the Uk, there has not been 1,single mention of people having the flu this winter by the MSM. NOT 1! Now is'nt that just sooooo convenient? On a personal note! For the very 1st time in my life, I actually caught the flu. Yeah, I was bloody rough for about 2 weeks but, guess what? Mu own body did this amazing thing. My immune system booted up and kicked that virus into touch Yeahhhh, good old evolution showed its glorious powers of recovery. Thing is? when I called my doc? the receptionist IMMEDIATELY diagnosed that I had Cov 19! NEVER considered the flu. NEVER considered ANY other possible ailment. Now WHY did she take that attitude? (because she was 'brainwashed' into thinking that way! (:
Thank you for posting this link, but the video has been censored by youtube and all you get now is a black screen. This excellent presentation by Wakefield, titled "Man, Measles, and Make Believe" may be available elsewhere on the web for people who are interested.
As a Paramedic a few years ago I attended 2 vax injured patients on the same day. One a 6 year old boy who had developed hydrocephalus and epilepsy and also an 80 yr old lady, slim, fit previously playing golf who became virtually bed ridden with sores in her mouth and pain in her abdomen and private parts. Heart breaking
Thanks for sharing ... we need to collectively stand up against what I believe is actually a scam
I have not read his research or the reading against his research, but it's clear here that he is not against vaccines, just the MMR combination
@Sam Yaza I thought this shit what we r in right now is a new shit .. I have to admit .. I was wrong! This shit is not new .. just a renewable one. We should consider to clear all of this "drugmaffia"'s freelance out from our history for ever!
He moved more anti vaccine to help his grift but of course at this point he wasn't against all vaccines. Part of his scam was that he was developing his own vaccine (and also a therapeutic) when his fraudulent study was demonizing the current one.
@@jasonbolding3481 is obviously a paid Pharma shill by his many comments here.
Yes they pay people to troll and post their lying deceptive comments.
The only scammer here is Jason.
Ironically Scammer Jason is working for the same people who develop hundreds of vaccines and try to get them on the childhood schedule so they can make millions and billions more.
Is Scammer Jason for or against vaccines???
He was against giving babies and children a huge viral load of multiple shots over and over that overwhelms a tiny system. He also found research they omitted when presenting research that left out how it was engineered to specifically target, or have the worst effect, on black male babies and children. If you can find the docu, The Silent Epidemic, it goes into detail and presents solid evidence.
These are crimes against humanity, not medicine.
@@jasonbolding3481 Baloney! (:
Interesting. It is actual corporate policy to discredit dissenters..
And the people who make their own reaserch
Yes... this has been historically true .. look up the term heretic ... to think a corporation would not try to squash opposition of any kind, is naive
Exactly. His whistle blowing exposed their crimes. They attacked him...because they feared him.
Wow, this is obviously pre-2016, when CBS was still an objective reporter of the news. I bet you nobody in CBS today will interview Dr. Wakefield nor Dr. Brian Hooker in this respectful manner ever again. The gloves of friendly fascism are off, its now the iron fist. They are playing the long game here people and at the expense of our children, we have to take a stand.
I noticed the same thing too, all across medias. CNN used to report real news too and do investigative journalism. So did CBC in Canada. I came across a health article saying that flu stats were way over inflated and based on faulty models (hmm faulty models that get the world to overreact, sounds familiar). You would never see an article like that anymore, because it's obvious that over inflating flu and flu deaths is a great fear incentive to get people to get that flu vax that barely works.
@@saintejeannedarc9460 Indeed, part of it is because in the 1980s on CBS we had people like Bill Moyers who would investigate the evil and corrupt CIA. In 1977 the New York Times reported a piece on the global propaganda network the CIA had, but today they are actually invited on TV as pundits. Hahaha, here is a guy who is a spook, he is taught to social engineer and he gets invited on a news network to give his opinion. Lets invite a wolf into the farm to speak on what we should do with the henhouse. They are out of control and out of order.
While Wakefield has the right to defend his view, I am concluding most of the people on here, including you are taking this 2009 interview and using it as availability heuristics to make conclusions about the COVID-19 vaccine. To be honest, why would CBS want to interview a disgraced researcher who has a history of siding with the anti-vaccine people? Also, most people didn't even read his study. I did. What he is telling the truth on from that interview is that it is about interpretation. He states that the report did not say it proves MMR vaccine causes Autism Spectrum. That part is TRUE. It does not say that. However, what he failed to mention was in the study it does in fact say that they found over 50% of the children (sample of 12), were observed with bowl and other digestive issues, and later were observed having behavioral issues after taking the MMR vaccine. And we now know Wakefield is an anti-vaccine advocate. And since not one person has been able to replicate his findings, we have to conclude Wakefield committed researcher bias.
@@christophergreen4616 Ridiculous conclusion. I read his research paper as well. I also studied nutrition, which has a special emphasis on gut health, so I immediately recognized his conclusions about gut flora in some made them extra susceptible to the MMR vaccine. He in no way fudged his data. Pharma is extremely powerful. His study was peer reviewed and accepted by the Lancet, which is pretty much the gold standard of medical journals. His peers understood what a hot potato taking on big pharma was and questioning their haloed vaccines. I'm not going to get into how bizarre I find vax worshipers, the true believers who seem to make a religion out of a brilliant on the one hand medical technology, but also excessively dangerous when it goes wrong medical therapy, to which one size is supposed to fit all. And the damn things are mandated and forced on people in ever increasing amounts. Some of us have some sense and perspective on how reckless and unrealiistic that is. Yet you mention anit vaccine people like it's a hex, the most insulting thing a person could be. It's like a spell or a religion really. Most of us that rightly, realistically question vaccines (and some far more than others, such as the extra risky MMR) we want vaccine choice first off, but we want much higher standards of vaccine safety. Pharma is deadly dangerous and will stop at nothing to keep its profits as high as possible. Its baffling the only conclusion you can draw is the Wekefield was wrong, not the pharma IS Wrong and their vax is dangerous. Why did no one replicate the study? How naive. They made an example out of his. He was top of his field, had won awards, and now he had his license stripped. All for trying to help horrifically vaccine damaged kids and their desperate families.
@@christophergreen4616 1. A 'disgraced researcher who has a history if siding with the anti-vaxxers'? DID you ;listen' to ANYTHING AW said in this interview? Clearly you cant of!!
2. ALL of those children DID have an adverse and chronic reaction almost immediately after receiving the MMR vaccine. FACT! It was the parents of those poor kids that approached AW asking him for help.
3. You repeat this obsurd and intentional flse statement again, claiming AW is an 'anti-vaxxer'. WHERE in this clip does AW even remotely suggest taking such a stance? I mean, if I missed it? then SHOW ME?? ):
Anti-Vaxxers keep referencing Andrew Wakefield as someone who is Anti-Vaccine but from this interview, he seems to be pro-vaccine since his children are vaccinated and reccomends vaccines but not all three at once?
His position on vaccination changed gradually over a period of years, partly due to his further research on MMR and autism, but mainly due to hearing the accounts of many parents describing their children's vaccine injuries. He also continued studying the history of measles and the history and effects of the measles vaccine. It used to be that you could watch a brilliant presentation he did on measles and the measles vaccine, on youtube, but that video seems to have been censored.
Thank you! From when was this interview?
2009
Am I the only pro vax in the comment section
Nah. Just here to get ammo to go back to work and debate with an antivax wackjob coworker of mine. Can't really debate effectively if you don't understand where the opponent is coming from. With as many studies as there are that have proven there is no correlation with vaccines and autism holding onto this one that does seems pretty desperate and naive, especially when the dude who authored it plainly states the authors who redacted their statements wanted to redact the misguided assumption that vaccines cause autism. People will believe what they want to believe. Look at how many people believe the earth is flat today, kinda the same thought process. I'm not even saying vaccines are 100% great for you either as many chemicals and shit that are in them I'm sure they're probably at least mildly harmful (assuming you get them constantly which we don't really) but there is no proof that they cause autism.
@@Myth0x2 LOL, that's an appropriate handle. Most parents become pro medical choice after they or their child becomes ill or in some case dies. Did you even listen to the interview? The Pharmaceutical industry immediately went after him instead of doing actual research and true safety studies. There are NO double blind placebo studies because the vaccines are not safe. There is too much money at stake. Now we have a huge amount of fear mongering regarding simple childhood illnesses. We are destroying the health of our younger generations to fill the pocketbooks of the Pharmaceutical companies. Also, we give around 72 doses by the time a child is 18. That's more than a little excessive. I was very ill after my last Tetanus which turned out to be a TDap and I was not told this. I only found out later when a nonmedical person said they do not make a separate Tetanus anymore. I had definite memory problems for awhile and my sometimes asthma became a full-time issue. If vaccines are so great then the vaccinated have nothing to fear from the unvaccinated. Hey, have you caught yourself up to the childhood schedule. If not you could be considered unvaccinated.😁
@@tlraffaele there have actually been multiple studies trying to replicate his findings to no avail which disproved time and again that he falsified his information. And the fear mongering is coming from people like you who are saying these things are literally going to die or have serious developmental deficiencies if they don't take your stance. I'm not trying to defend the pharmaceutical industry here. I fee like they're just as corrupt as any other mega corporation entity, all I'm saying is this study is filled with holes and misnomers. Even the coauthors on this study withdrew themselves from the statement that the vaccines cause autism, he literally says that in this video
@@Myth0x2 Did you actually watch the video? It wasn't a study, it was a small group of children. They definitely had developed diagnosible health issue following the MMR. Having witnessed this in the children of friends I absolutely believe the MMR triggers this. Wakefield gave very reasonable recommendations that got him targeted. He did not go ballistic and say we shouldn't vaccinate at all, he just said there appears to be an issue with this combo vaccine that needs further study. The fear mongering comes from those who seem to think it was some miracle that humans continued to exist before vaccines. My children were fully vaccinated. They both have eczema problems, one has asthma and the other could not eat fresh fruit till she was in her mid 20's. The older one developed Steven Johnson Syndrome(very scary, look it up) in High School. She is only around today because by then I had embraced alternative healing. The Docs had no clue at all and gave her steroids that didn't help. That was our last visit to a conventional Doctor for that. When you can show me true double blind placebo studies that show vaccines are safe let me know. Good luck, they don't exist. What they do is test the vaccine with and without the antigen. Meaning the shots without the antigen still contain all the other ingredients like aluminum, formaldehyde, bovine serum, aborted fetal DNA. This is not a true safety test.
@@tlraffaele considering it was scientific research done by a group of doctors that was then published in a scientific journal (even though it has now been discredited) I'm going to call it a study. Feel free to call it whatever you would like the verbiage of it is trivial and not really the point. Something I think we should remember is correlation does not always equal causation, if you google "spurious correlations" there's a website that does a fairly good and kind of comical explanation of this with a few data points over some different graphs. Living systems are so complicated it's often difficult to pinpoint one thing as being the definite cause of a problem, usually there are multiple factors at play. Right now people are jumping to vaccines because it seems like a convenient answer and they're just relying on this one study to assert those claims. It would be like blaming the cleaning company's staff for things that go missing in your office when in reality a coworker forgot to return an item, and all of this is based off of another coworker's rumors at the water cooler. And if you really want to argue about the effectiveness of modern medicine compared to what we had prior I feel like you'll be fighting an uphill battle. Things like polio, mumps, smallpox, rabies, tetanus, any bacterial infection were all serious threats to life before we had measured against them, usually in the form of vaccinations (excluding bacterial infections I was mainly referring to antibiotics there). My frustrations with this issue is there are now large amounts of people going against centuries (the first successful vaccine was for smallpox in 1798) of scientific advancement because of one person's misguided claims. The fact that people blame every ailment they or someone they know has on it being the vaccine's fault also just reiterates they understand very little about how biological systems work. Like I said earlier saying something is definitely being caused by something else is a pretty serious statement that takes evidence beyond a reasonable doubt which as of now has not been produced.
Sharyl, we love you!
I don't think his mic is on.
Published in the day, when freedom of speech still was available and news sources hadn't been silenced yet.
One year later and we have pure Fascism.
Vaccines don't cause autism.
@@misterauctor7353 I suggest you go and have a wee chat with the parents recorded in the films Vaxxed and Vaxxed 11. I think you'll find that they strongly dis-agree with your 'certainty in what you claim. (:
@@1wannabee1 That film doesn't have science.
@@misterauctor7353 Correct! It does'nt have 'your' science' in it, but has a certain type of science that most people prefer to believe, ie, The TRUTH.(NOT the science that 'bought' scientists spout) (:
We believe your interpretation brother your courage is outstanding.
Idiots like you believe this crank. Majority of intelligent sensible people, thank God, DON'T!
@@JfK--OBJECTivE Calling people names is the easiest way to convince them, isn't it?
@@JfK--OBJECTivE Roflmfaaaao. Oh really? Oh and I suppose you include yourself in this class of 'intelligent/sensible' people yes?lolol. The intelligent'sensible people 'listen,especially to people who do NOT have a personal agenda,ie, those who stand to make a frigging fortune on the products that they produce. DUH
Yes, they destroyed his career and reputation. Medical professionals are afraid to speak truth...they call it being "Wakefielded."
I vaccinated ( MMR ) my son when he was 15 months old in the year 2010 . A super active sharp normal kid started behaving odd . At first we didn't understand then doctors confirmed autism . We were shocked . We analysed all possible reasons and narrowed down to the time of his behaviour difference and found out it was after just a couple of days after MMR vaccination . If only i have seen or heard of Dr. Wakefield's findings we could have well avoided this .
I am from deep south India Tamilnad .
Since then i started to spread the news .
It happened to my son as well and every I know with an autistic child had the same story , I'm in Britain.
There’s literally no apropos literature that connects the two causally. Calm down.
@Kinga European Orthopedic Shoes for Kids and Women That cure isn't made available to us ( since they're in denial what would you expect! , all these media rubbish to serve one purpose "to fool us and diminish their responsibilities ") unfortunately even if that's the case it's too late for my child he is 10yrs now , but thanks for the info maybe some child in that age could benefit from it .
First, that is YOUR fault and your BREEDING partners' fault that you have a kid. Breeding is MURDER. YOUR choice to murder your kid, to force suffering onto your kid. Secondly, YOU HAVE NO PROOF of what causes your kids' reactions. YOU are not a scientist doing RESEARCH in the field of physiology & virology. You just blame a vaccine for your kids' kills because that's an EASY target.
Autism starts around the same time of vaccinations, there was no link found between the MMR and autism
*Alan Awake Meme without of Voice*
I had a debate with someone on this and they treated me as if I was stupid. I asked how these various things naturally enter the human environment and how they spread. He couldn't say. But..... If polio was erradicated( I was screamed this by a medical student) why do we still vaccinate for it? You are literally shooting polio into your system along with any number of different things. That you can contract, spread, and have a reaction from.
Polio can be cured ... the cures have been dismissed
@@OfftoShambala to say there's a cure for something is to say you've figured out the needed environment in order for polio to even sustain itself. So then the question is how do you naturally get polio. Then you'd have to explain to me the risks of NATURAL spread in the human populis. My point is that people like to claim that vaccines have eradicated polio when by proxy that can't possibly be true. If it were there would be no samples to mass produce a vaccine, nor a reason to continue to vaccinate for it. Anyway you want to slice it vaccines are useless and always have been.
Vivian Woods useless and dangerous
Vivian Woods apparently, most kids, around 99%, who contracted polio didn’t even know they had had it!
Their parents thought their kids had just had a bad cold.
As for the pictures of kids laying in those hideous machines, all lined up, was completely false also
amhistory.si.edu/polio/historicalphotos/index.htm
@@wazz1154 hell this very first vaccines in were forced onto a small town where the children were dying 3x more from it rather than the illness itself. No one wanted it and it was eventually let go of until they had a bigger propaganda machine in order to trick people into it.
I believe this man. I did my child single. MMR.
I commend you, seriously, for caring about your children.
Unfortunately I found out about all of this too late. Now? my g.son is 6 years old and is autistic! Yeah and I am grieving daily now thinking, if only! (:
@@1wannabee1 Autism is genetic.
@@misterauctor7353 Oh really? Well go and tell that to all the parents who's children were 'co-incidentlly' and profoundly damaged practically immediately after receiving that MMR vaccine and lets see what THEY have to say to your silly and ignorant words. (:
@@1wannabee1 Yes, really. It is genetic. Tell your lies to scientists.
I appreciate CBS News being willing to give Wakefield a voice to defend the charges "at that time". However, what many, many people fail to recall is that 12 co-authors were with Wakefield on this study. Also, the main issue that got Wakefield into trouble was not his "interpretation" rebuttal. That rebuttal is solid because the original article does say their findings does not prove MMR vaccine could cause Autism Spectrum. What got him in trouble was not one research study was able to replicate his results. And why in the world would 12 other researchers recant the whole study if they believed it was true legit science?
In science, replication is very important. If other researchers can replicate your results, that makes your case even stronger for the need to look into the effects of the MMR vaccine and a possible link to Autism Spectrum. When a researcher gets different results using different samples or a change in methodology, that's not bad and the original author can be honest and admit their theory has flaws. But, when no one can replicate your results, and other researcher mimic every procedure to the tee, and used a sample of children with the same symptoms; that's a red flag. Wakefield claimed in his observations of the children, over 50% of the children's bowl and other digestive issues and future onset of behavioral issues were observed weeks after taking the MMR vaccine. He suggests a possible association between MMR vaccine and Autism Spectrum and other possible behavioral issues.
The average layperson with no experience in research science will obviously interpret that as a legit concern. So, I don't blame the global concern. But, what I don't get is why still, a lot of people don't see some had to had ran foul in the methodology, or the data findings. Something like this should had been able to be replicated. That's what got Wakefield in trouble.
Watch the films, Vaxxed and Vaxxed 11! (ALL the answers to your questions/doubts are there to be found. 9IF you 'want' to learn the truth??)
youre too smart for this comment section
This was a case study. He and his co-authors were not testing an hypothesis. There has been no true attempt to replicate the findings of this study, but many studies since 1998 have shown the gut brain connection supporting the findings of the Wakefield Walker-Smith study. What got him into trouble was that he found that the safety testing of the MMR vaccine was horribly inadequate and, after the case study began, he agreed to testify as an expert witness on behalf of plaintiffs suing Merck, the maker of the MMR vaccine, because he saw how inadequate the safety testing had been. He was a David who went up against the Goliath pharma industrial complex and he was too naive to see it at the time. Rupert Murdoch a media giant had a son who was appointed to the board of Merck. Murdoch was the employer of Bryan Deer, the journalist who triggered and perpetuated the smear campaign after the study had been peer reviewed and published. There were no scientists or doctors who found fault with the study until that campaign was under way. People do not understand the depth of corruption in the scientific, media and medical industrial complexes and the lengths to which they will go to protect their product.
@@cwassellful Everything you have written there is complete and utter nonsense.
Wakefield is and always has been a scam artist. There was no finding in that paper, the parents were all brough to him by a lawyer. The Royal Free told him that they would find a proper research study and would give him all the tools at their disposal in order to do so. He refused. It's obvious why.
He was struck off because he falsified records and ignored datat that went against his hypothesis.
Frankly, he, and anyone who supports him, can needs to fuck off.
@Taotl The study results couldn't be replicated
Doesn't Jaques Beneviste come to mind here?, And Robert Hoxley and Rene Cassie?
I don't think he quite reaches the level of those charlatans
@@jasonbolding3481 Charlatans or not their case studies make interesting reading and their cancer cures in the thousands. However, it is important to take plenty of anti-biotics regardless of WHO guidelines insist that you want them to your doctor. Make sure you get doubly or quadruple vaccinated don’t worry about adjuvants, aldehydes and Mercury it’s all irrelevant and of no consequence. Get, lots of x-ray scans every month and MRI to make sure all is well the x-ray level is not any issue. Finally don’t bother reading the side effects listing info sheet which comes with medicines. 100 000 people dying every year from dr prescribed medicine in the USA alone high lighted by the FDA is also just a number.
No parent can say they weren't warned. The choice they make for their child now is their own:
1986 The Act.
Which act says that?
Exactly.
BS! A person/parent can ONLY make an informed decision/choice, when ALL the literature,information is being provided. Clearly, from the evidence, the pharma industry is being 'convenient' with the truth,facts when giving that info on the vaccines that THEY say are safe.
Weren't warned for what..? For not vaccinating their children and risking their health from Measles?
Wait, so why was Wakefield’s medical license revoked?
It was
Unethical behavior and professional misconduct. His paper altered data, he failed to disclose major conflicts of interest like recruiting his subject through a vaccine litigation law firm, and to qoute the medical board "showed callous disregard for any distress or pain the children might suffer" in preforming unneeded invasive test .Among other things
@@jasonbolding3481 there is always "a reason", I am more interessed in the cause
@@jasonbolding3481 Hi big pharma.
@@jasonbolding3481 you should read his book because he goes into detail about each of those allegations and shows how they were falsified and used to assassinate his career because he touched MMR.
I support vaccination. However, everything human made is not perfect and can be improved on, especially medicine. So rather than crucifying scientists/researchers for questioning the establishment, we should engage with their investigation and support the minds of our brightest people. I don't think Dr. Wakefield published his findings to harm the world, but rather to help create safer medicine.
He faked his research for profit. The profit of the amti vaccine law firm he was working with, the profit of the alternative vaccine he was devolping and the profit of the sham test kit he was designing. Not for safety
@@jasonbolding3481 This is incorrect. You are repeating talking points from a smear campaign developed and perpetuated by people who sat on the board of the drug company which had a lot to lose if people realized how dangerous their product was. You are either a victim of propaganda, or you are one of an unbelievable number of trolls who are incentivized to perpetuate misinformation to keep this lie going. If you are the latter, then there's nothing to do about it; you already know what you are doing and saying is wrong. If you are the former, and would like to begin to understand what really happened, rather than just blindly believing special interest groups who have no problem harming millions of children for life, you can watch his interview with Del Bigtree on the Highwire.
@@jasonbolding3481 THAT is a flat-out LIE and you bloody well know it is IF you've done your homework, Pfft
@@1wannabee1 he violently tortured children in his study. You'd know that if you bothered to read the paper.
@@1wannabee1 It certainly is not a lie and they are the very reasons he was struck off. He was raising parents in the background, he was working with lawyers who stood to make money from government funded legal aid win or lose.
This is all in the public domain, mate.
You have to demand that the mmr be split up in the vaccination!
Japan investigated the MMR, and refuse to give it to their population; it they need a vaccine for mumps, measles or rhubella (sp?) they will use the individual vaccines but not the MMR!
@@johndesade126 is this true
Eloquent, intelligent, courageous, calm and right.
I agree i listened to this and felt calmer 🙄
Bollocks.
The voice of reason. Any time people fear the truth, they are always hiding something.
Que pena que esté en ingles..I do not speak english
Why not learn the language most used in the world??
@@katnip2u Why not learn that Spanish AND mandarin beat it
@@Jose-ee2se I'm fluent in Castellano and don't care for another language of no consequence to me (next to the 9 languages I have under my belt).
@@katnip2u this is very arrogant, is english your native tounge??
This man is spot on 👍
No he's not. Have you read the study and followed the whole scandal?
Well said Margaret. This mans only crime? was 'caring' for children who's parents concerns were NOT being listened to and they looked to Andrew for help ,to which he did not refuse. What I say is, go and ask them parents what they think of Andrew Wakefield!! (tis THEY who are having to pick up the pieces and the damage that has been done to those poor children NOT the big pharmacutical companies who btw, are immune from prosectution regarding any claim of damages done to the people who receive their vacines!
@@1wannabee1 The crime for lying?
@@1wannabee1 he cared for the children a lot in fact! So much he fucking abused them. For example, doing a colonoscopy on a five year old child while not detailing the risks. They found nothing, and that child's intestines were punctured in the procedure and had to fight for his life.
@@misterauctor7353 You what? You sit there and have the brass neck to insinuate that AW is a 'liar'? How DARE you be sooo ignorant. I have read some stoopid,naive comments in my time but you have just taken them attributes to a new level.1. It has been 'proved' that big pharma have 'lied', altered data AND even destroyed documents to evade incrimination.
2. Big pharma have 'lied' to the medical profession for YEARS! FACT.
3. Fyi? the whistle-blower, (who worked for the CDC btw) has been requested by the Senate in the US by a congressman to be ;invited; to speak in the house so that he can reveal what he knows. Now guess what? That request was made some time ago now and as of yet? that man STILL has not been 'called'. Now I want you to be totally honest with yourself here and ask just why that is? think! WHY has that man NOT been called to speak? (NO need to phone a friend me thinks for the answer to that question) (:
dr wakfield ur exactly write
Lez Hulse Of course a person such as yourself who believes in the falsified research of a man who no longer has a medical license would also spell “right” as “write
@@viktoriialomonosova1715 he spelled "write" correctly, which causes me to suspect that English simply isn't his first language. A mistake of this kind is easy to make, even for native speakers. It does not denote a lack of intelligence.
@@natashabuchanan6072 Maybe a lack of scruples and morals?
@@JfK--OBJECTivE You must have your moral damned "write"! Congratulations.
@@viktoriialomonosova1715 I dont give a monkeys how Lez's grammar is. They are 'right' and thats it,(try and concentrate on the 'content' rather than the presentation please) (:
I want to nominate Dr. Wakefield for my imaginary but tremendously prestigious "Empathy for Humanity" Award. The biggest Trophy and 10 lb Gold Metal goes with the recognition of his life long efforts to save our children from Vaccine damage.
idiot.
I second that, UpNorthOfThe49th. How extraordinarily sad that we are dealing with the same medical tyranny in 2020 as that which allowed herbalists and midwives to be branded as witches and burned at the stake! Nothing has changed. In fact, it has become worse. It is only because of brave, dedicated human beings like Dr. Wakefield, Dr. Mikovits, Dr. William Thompson who consider the truth to be greater than their personal freedoms that we have any hope.
@@Navillus2273 Obviously you haven't seen Vaxxed and Vaxxed II, or obviously you work for the pharmaceutical industry, or obviously you're just an evil bastard. No, you are the idiot. I know what vaccines can do first hand, and it isn't pretty. So be sure you stay updated on all of your vaccines, because you deserve it with that kind of an attitude.
Aight boys time to take out the Karen
@@patriciafrazier1020 you're right, I hate how big pharma is taking away our right to kill children
I would like to make a blog about this, but i don`t understand what he is saying about ''the vioxx tral in Australia, and there quotes''
Can someone please clear that up? What is the Violl trial?? There is a newspaper called the Viox, and there are more related names.. English is not my best language
Sebastiaan Baan
Vioxx was the most common marketing name for the anti-inflammatory medication Rofecoxib. It was removed from the market in 2004, after multiple studies showing it was unsafe...with some estimates it contributed to ~50,000 deaths. You can read Wikipedia’s interpretation on it. Whoever wrote it.
Did you end up making a BLOG?
He was discredited no?
No. Only in propaganda media who receive big $$$$ paid ads from Pharma
But not in the real world for those who are curious.
He lost his medical license after his fraudulent research and unethical behavior
@@jasonbolding3481 his senior partner in the study was recently exonerated and his license to practice restored, the court excoriated the medical panel for their fraud and lack of evidence against the team. That Dr had since retired anyway but his honour has been restored.
Since the same fake evidence was used against Dr Wakefield it is reasonable to expect the same result.
He's a far better man than most in the industry.
Filmaker and exProducer of the TV series Doctors and VAXXED Del Bigtree said many doctors tell him they know vaccines cause autism but they don't want to be Wakefielded.
@@NathanEllery incorrect, His partner was not exonerated. The judge actually said if he was conducting research , as you imply he was by with the connection to mr
Wakefield, he was guilty of misconduct . The ruling was abput methodology and wether the board probably handle the question of wether Walker-Smith was was undertaking research in the guise of clinical investigation or wether the interventions were clinically indicated. Nothing to do with Mr.Wakefield's fraud, which is why Mr. Wakefield also did not appeal
He did a great job discrediting himself
we support dr wakefield
les smith no we don’t
I hope I live to see the day that Wakefield is vindicated. The look on Brian Deer’s face will be priceless.
Ditto.
Unfortunately I can't see that happening for you without a severe overdose of LSD...
Less then a year before his controversial paper came out, Wakefield released a patent for a measles vaccine. So Wakefield patents a measles vaccine.
Then he conducts a study, and is told by some of the parents, "I think the first time I remember seeing symptoms of autism in my child was after the MMR vaccine." Apparently this must be reported on because untrained people kinda thought maybe a thing could have happened, and that's important scientific information. If some of them had said, "I think the first time I remember my child having symptoms of autism was shortly after fairies all sprinkled them with pixie dust," it apparently would've been scientifically relevant to report that. Then Wakefield goes on a crusade to convince parents that MMR will screw up their kids, but separate vaccines for these things (like Wakefield's) are totally cool. All in the interest of saving the children, of course.
THANK YOU FOR THIS COMMENT , its really shocking how can people actually believe him
@@vaibhavigupta438 Especially considering the signs of autism don't really show until the age when we start vaccinating children. This guy is supposed to be a scientist and completely forgot that _some_ correlation is not causation.
But I guess when you want to sell your measles vaccine you just conveniently forget about that kind of thing.
@@vaibhavigupta438 Please read my reply to @glitchxero4687.
Brilliant! Thank you Dr Wakefield! You are a beacon of integrity and Courage! A very rare combination today. Thank you for your honesty
Yes, it's good CBS News AT THAT TIME gave Wakefield his chance to give his side. Have you read the infamous retracted study? I did. While he is correct that he said their findings does not prove MMR vaccine causes Autism. The article does say over 50% of the children with the stomach and digestive issues who are later observed to experience behavioral issues a short period after taking the MMR vaccine. The real problem that got Wakefield in trouble stems from an important element of research science. Replication. Even with him saying his study should be an important discussion trigger on MMR vaccine, not one researcher was able to replicate his findings. What many people also fail to remember is there were 12 other authors on this study.
Why would 12 authors retract and recant the study if it was methodologically sound? Something had to be a miss. And why is it that still today-----no one researcher has been able to replicate Wakefield's findings?
@@christophergreen4616 (pst! they 'did'nt'). Watch the clip provided!!
th-cam.com/video/LrdLvSnNjzc/w-d-xo.html
@@christophergreen4616 Why was Wakefield struck off in the uk.
This makes me fearful
@@Whizzy-jx3qe they needed to make an example of AW to show others in the future who might think of doing the same as him! (psst! its called corruption at its finest) (:
Andrew Wakefield was developing his own vaccine, he had a financial interest in the demise of the mmr vaccine
Um, yeah no. This is misinformation. He was researching the component of colostrum in breastmilk that provides immune protection to certain childhood diseases. He was not developing his own vaccine.
And what vaccine was that?
He's not against vaccines, he us against multiple vaccines in one injection. He believes this hasn't been scrutinised enough. I'd trust him over the pharma industry any day.
@@cwassellful no he was. He had a patent for it and everything. He has claimed multiple times he just thinks the vaccines should be given separately
@@annettajensen6751 you trust the disgraced ex dr. with a financial incentive, who lied in his study, abused children, and cosigned a patent with a man who thinks his personal bone marrow can cure cancer? Bold.
@@drywall1873 Correct on the latter; incorrect on the former. He was developing a patent for a treatment utilizing colostrum for kids who could not take the measles vaccine. Yes, it is correct that he did not advise anyone to not be vaccinated, he just recommended that parents request the single (non-multivalent) vaccine.
I love Dr Wakefield Andrew, he stood for the facts though it costed him a lot
Or the entire nation.
What facts?
..he stood for lies, he went against the facts his own study found and ignored the things his own scientists working on his study for him told him.
Yes, he's a soldier in the fight for truth...the fight for our children and their health, their future...
Please look into the CDC meeting held in Feb you can find the channel on TH-cam... they have presented that in 2017/18 approx 10 million people from the US were admitted to hospital by summer for influenza related illnesses; so far in the US there are approximately 7 million people that have been admitted and we are in April! With the amount of people diagnosed with 'Covid-19' who don't actually have it, I wouldn't really be surprised if the hospitalisations by summer reach above that 10 million mark.
My question is, why did the WHO not push for an influenza vaccine during the year 2017/18?
Its quite funny that,here in the Uk, there has not been 1,single mention of people having the flu this winter by the MSM. NOT 1! Now is'nt that just sooooo convenient? On a personal note! For the very 1st time in my life, I actually caught the flu. Yeah, I was bloody rough for about 2 weeks but, guess what? Mu own body did this amazing thing. My immune system booted up and kicked that virus into touch Yeahhhh, good old evolution showed its glorious powers of recovery. Thing is? when I called my doc? the receptionist IMMEDIATELY diagnosed that I had Cov 19! NEVER considered the flu. NEVER considered ANY other possible ailment. Now WHY did she take that attitude? (because she was 'brainwashed' into thinking that way! (:
th-cam.com/video/FX95m5kXMBU/w-d-xo.html
Thank you for posting this link, but the video has been censored by youtube and all you get now is a black screen. This excellent presentation by Wakefield, titled "Man, Measles, and Make Believe" may be available elsewhere on the web for people who are interested.
thoseee legs!