Piston vs. Turbine: The Cost Efficiency Showdown with Dan Spray

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 20

  • @davescott9409
    @davescott9409 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I can't believe you didn't cover the difference in engine overhaul cost.

  • @speedracer9132
    @speedracer9132 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Missed opportunity to compare engine overhaul costs when discussing operation costs

  • @ictpilot
    @ictpilot หลายเดือนก่อน

    What's an oil change for the engine on the turbine and when is due? (hrs) And how many hrs flight time was the break even point between piston and turbine?

  • @JamesBraun-n1p
    @JamesBraun-n1p 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The cost of one TBO would be about the cost of a nwe plane or seveal motor overhauls on a piston motor .

  • @ryany4326
    @ryany4326 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why Syracuse of all places to train? Just curious bale cause I base out of ksyr and I'm interested in owning a pa46

    • @caseyaviation
      @caseyaviation  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We have instructors all over the country and we try to pair clients with the closest instructor qualified in their airframe. At the time, we had an instructor in Syracuse.

  • @dimsler2
    @dimsler2 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The actual comparison starts at 27min mark, rest has no relavent purpose.

  • @gtm624
    @gtm624 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Not to go off topic but I’m wondering how this guys wife learned not to tell him no 😮🤔

    • @TRUTHSEEKER1129
      @TRUTHSEEKER1129 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lol

    • @caseyaviation
      @caseyaviation  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There’s a podcast topic we’ll probably never touch! 😂

  • @dimsler2
    @dimsler2 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The conclusion he makes is for his mission he should just buy a Phenom 100 and burn 100usg per hour to do 380kts.

  • @rammstein1903
    @rammstein1903 หลายเดือนก่อน

    PA-28R-200 and PA-28R-201 are BOTH 200hp.
    Someone should not be earning a high performance endorsement in any Arrow. The -##1 in the model distinguishes that it is a taper wing. The same goes for the PA-28-151 (-161) is a Warrior I (II). Or, a PA-28-181 is an Archer. All of these are taper wing planes, versus the hershey bar Cherokee predecessors.

  • @stevespessard2306
    @stevespessard2306 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just wondering where the vision jet fits into this analysis, if at all? It cruises at over 300 knots, seats 7, has a decent range, but can be bought for more like $2.7mm for a newer used model.

    • @BonanzaPilot
      @BonanzaPilot 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Cirrus Jet is Probably most comparable to a late Meridian (not a M600/700 but a Meridian or M500). Loading to range capabilities are very similar and price is similar. The Meridian is going to use less runway but the Cirrus Jet will be slightly faster and go slightly higher (if its a newer one). The Cirrus is going to be more in line with a TBM in operating cost, a far more capable airplane. The Meridian the cheapest, purpose built, turbine.

  • @FlyingNDriving
    @FlyingNDriving 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whatever's you do with the piston, don't lean on the ground/s

    • @一万小时
      @一万小时 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Many experts encourage aggressively leaning on ground. Care to explain your position?

    • @FlyingNDriving
      @FlyingNDriving 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@一万小时 /s means sarcasm, there's a certain "well respected" pa-46 instructor making a no leaning claim as if the pa-46 piston is some magical exception

    • @一万小时
      @一万小时 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@FlyingNDriving OK that's not useful knowledge/s

    • @kevin409galv
      @kevin409galv 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I never lean my TSIO520 Malibu on the ground. Fine wire plugs and zero issues in 8 years of flying it. I leaned in many other aircraft that were susceptible to plug fouling. The Continental Malibu is not on of those planes.