We were developing a large movie theater / shopping center complex back in the early 90's and hit lava cap and had to bring in a D575 to rip it as nothing else could get it done. These are sooooo huge in person. They are amazing!
High drive undercarriage is a CAT thing. No benefit. More parts to buy and wear. The track length actually shortens during ripping thus giving less traction. Komatsu all the way!
@TurboGSR96 There was a mining company in West Virginia that ran EIGHT of these huge dozers.I have a book that shows 2 of them pushing side by side down grade.Spectacular photograph. The D575A-3SD was equipped with a 90 cubic yard blade.No other dozer has come close to that capacity.
As with most companies, you have blind dedicated followers. It seems the cat, John deere and Chevy guys have the blindfolded sheep syndrome worse than most; though
To be fair you can see he is preparing the ground for something and hence why no full blades, if he had a D11 it would be no different. At the end of the day Cat now need to make a D12, the demand is there and if you have ever seen a D11 knock out a load that a 400 ton truck drops it struggles and you can,t always back to the edge with a 9when loaded) 650 ton trucks. The thing i see is that i dont think a D12 needs to be 575 sized, 1000HP around 125 tons would be ideal i think
Andrew Crews Excellent! I had been thinking of getting a 30 horse or so compact tractor and converting it to rubber tracks. Based on where the rear axle is, "high track" makes the most sense. Although I might be able to import one from China cheaper than I could build one. :-(
D-11 is no match for D-575, and there are only 45 of this beast in the world, so that why its don't sales much. Its probably not easy and very expensive to builts em.
@@Nick-wm6ft it mite be but i would still have my d11s then one 575 u run one d11 in a 11 hour shift and a 575 in a 11 hour shift c how much fuel do use. The 575 mite push more but the 11 will use less fuel and less break downs then the 575. I know we had one and we sold it cost to much to operate and replace it with a d11t
I worked for Komatsu for many years, they didn't break down any more than Cat , Deere or anything else, their biggest problem was that for a long time most parts had to come from Japan, we couldn't fly them in overnight at the time. And Komatsu changed parts A LOT, serial number and model number differences, and the fact that they really didn't break down much at all, by the time we got a history of replacement parts that were most used, Komatsu would change the designs, so we really never could get a head of the break downs. Cat & Deere use a lot of the same parts for years and years and on many different models, commonality of parts is an American thing and is the best way to do it. I had a meeting with Komatsu's design engineers and ask them why they didn't use the same parts across different models, their response was that parts was its own profit center and it would cut into profits. And only in America do we expect the dealer to have everything on their truck and fix it now, they didn't think this way when I was doing it, which was about 30 years ago. I had customers who had Cat, Komatsu, Deere and others, they told me the Cat and Deere would break down twice as much as the Komatsu, BUT the dealers could get them up and running faster.
@@Nick-wm6ft right that under standable now we ant no problem out of our two pc 3000 or pc 5500 and the smaler dozers like our d65s but now the 575 it would go down before the 11s or 10s and we would serivce every 250 hours like the rest of our equipment
We were developing a large movie theater / shopping center complex back in the early 90's and hit lava cap and had to bring in a D575 to rip it as nothing else could get it done. These are sooooo huge in person. They are amazing!
@Machi74005 And this is the D575A-2SR (Super Ripper), not even the SD (Super Dozer) so this machine is fitted with the smaller blade.
I really want to see one of these in person
Is that NorthAmerican roads 575 in Las Vegas?
In live in SoCal where was this filmed?
850hp for the cat D11 and 1150hp for the D575-A if i am correct?
Muito bom muito bom máquinas Espetacular gostei muito
This maybe bigger then the D11N,D11R or D11T but its sales aren t any near it
Probably just the doZer on a bit of an angle and the blade is level to move the dirt correctly
@Machi74005 It is bigger than the d11.
I bet the ripper on that colossus weighs more than some dozers!
где купить?
Super Bulldozer
High drive undercarriage is a CAT thing. No benefit. More parts to buy and wear. The track length actually shortens during ripping thus giving less traction. Komatsu all the way!
didnt think we had too many of these in America
@TurboGSR96 There was a mining company in West Virginia that ran EIGHT of these huge dozers.I have a book that shows 2 of them pushing side by side down grade.Spectacular photograph. The D575A-3SD was equipped with a 90 cubic yard blade.No other dozer has come close to that capacity.
CAT is a great company and equipment builder, but it blows my mind that people think they build the biggest everything.
As with most companies, you have blind dedicated followers. It seems the cat, John deere and Chevy guys have the blindfolded sheep syndrome worse than most; though
I never said CAT was the biggest
I just said they were the best 😁
@@dozerfarms cat is far from the best.
さすがコマツですね。D 575は世界最大のブルドーザーですからね。この技術、ものづくりはコマツ及び日本の誇りですよ。
Ur wrong the attco is the largest dozer
Italian acco super is biggest
@@bobanppvc it’s not even in service AHHHH DINASOUR
D575A made in Japan
To be fair you can see he is preparing the ground for something and hence why no full blades, if he had a D11 it would be no different.
At the end of the day Cat now need to make a D12, the demand is there and if you have ever seen a D11 knock out a load that a 400 ton truck drops it struggles and you can,t always back to the edge with a 9when loaded) 650 ton trucks. The thing i see is that i dont think a D12 needs to be 575 sized, 1000HP around 125 tons would be ideal i think
🇸🇦…
😅👍… excellent
He can even hit the ground
that guy is totally chewing long cut
Interesting that Komatsu doesn't used the raised drive sprocket like other "superdozers."
+Mark Stockman cause cats the only on aloud do use high sprocket
+jimmy johnson actually, I believe the patent has expired now. Yep. Looked it up, patent duration is 20 years. High track was introduced in the 80's
Andrew Crews Excellent! I had been thinking of getting a 30 horse or so compact tractor and converting it to rubber tracks. Based on where the rear axle is, "high track" makes the most sense. Although I might be able to import one from China cheaper than I could build one. :-(
Mark Stockman struckcorp.com/
Liebherr also use high sprocket
Lets see extra large,1,050 hp and 316,000 pounds with a U Blade thats about 11 feet high
the reason for flat track beacuse its extremly heavy
nope its a patent issue cat has the patent on high track
This view is not good for the vision. Small view 😩
D-11 is no match for D-575, and there are only 45 of this beast in the world, so that why its don't sales much. Its probably not easy and very expensive to builts em.
Komatsu doesn’t build the 575 anymore
could have made four passes with a good D8
Ne yaptı bu operatör ? Bıçak atmasını bile yapamadı o dozere çalışacak kapasite yok o operatörde
I would one d11 10 to 1 of these 575 they junk when they go down they r down to high price to keep running d11s are better
The 575 is way bigger than a D11
@@Nick-wm6ft it mite be but i would still have my d11s then one 575 u run one d11 in a 11 hour shift and a 575 in a 11 hour shift c how much fuel do use. The 575 mite push more but the 11 will use less fuel and less break downs then the 575. I know we had one and we sold it cost to much to operate and replace it with a d11t
I worked for Komatsu for many years, they didn't break down any more than Cat , Deere or anything else, their biggest problem was that for a long time most parts had to come from Japan, we couldn't fly them in overnight at the time. And Komatsu changed parts A LOT, serial number and model number differences, and the fact that they really didn't break down much at all, by the time we got a history of replacement parts that were most used, Komatsu would change the designs, so we really never could get a head of the break downs. Cat & Deere use a lot of the same parts for years and years and on many different models, commonality of parts is an American thing and is the best way to do it. I had a meeting with Komatsu's design engineers and ask them why they didn't use the same parts across different models, their response was that parts was its own profit center and it would cut into profits. And only in America do we expect the dealer to have everything on their truck and fix it now, they didn't think this way when I was doing it, which was about 30 years ago. I had customers who had Cat, Komatsu, Deere and others, they told me the Cat and Deere would break down twice as much as the Komatsu, BUT the dealers could get them up and running faster.
@@Nick-wm6ft right that under standable now we ant no problem out of our two pc 3000 or pc 5500 and the smaler dozers like our d65s but now the 575 it would go down before the 11s or 10s and we would serivce every 250 hours like the rest of our equipment
Muy lejana la toma y el operador o no sabe no está haciendo nada jugando con la tierra nada más soy operador de bulldozer