War Thunder's First Stealth Plane is TERRIBLE!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 148

  • @thesnazzycomet
    @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    I am sure this will annoy some people! Keep in mind I was referring to Air battles only :)

    • @hypoel1660
      @hypoel1660 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The thing that people don't realize , Is that the F-117 was meant to bomb at 11km+ not at 2km...

  • @ravanos4472
    @ravanos4472 หลายเดือนก่อน +71

    this is the most useless plane to be added

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Kinda yeah, its like a high tier PO-2

    • @Sleepjng
      @Sleepjng หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Yeah but it allows gaijin to make their future stealth aircraft semi realistc and not shit

    • @BlackWolf9988
      @BlackWolf9988 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@Sleepjng nah its a cash grab and people are gonna waste GE day one for it.

    • @YesName_1
      @YesName_1 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@thesnazzycometatleast the po2 has a gun

    • @TacoDuke
      @TacoDuke หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@YesName_1 And it looks more funny

  • @hypoel1660
    @hypoel1660 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    The thing that people don't realize , Is that the F-117 was meant to bomb at 11km+ not at 2km...

    • @WeeWoo6up
      @WeeWoo6up หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      And for war thunder to actually implement this aircraft they would need to make it viable to reach 11km in an air rb match

    • @midnightcat1202
      @midnightcat1202 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@WeeWoo6up air spawn?

    • @pro321pvp
      @pro321pvp หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@WeeWoo6up Pretty sure he was talking about grb

    • @explosivecommando9100
      @explosivecommando9100 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@WeeWoo6up also the fact that you can see the trail it leaves behind and the tiny maps you can encounter. What makes it worse is that in air rb you can see the enemy so in sim it must be def better

    • @squirrelmurderous
      @squirrelmurderous หลายเดือนก่อน

      Usually bombers don't ment to be at 2000 meters anyway. :D

  • @cmtosh2409
    @cmtosh2409 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    It really should get an air spawn, maybe even a bomber spawn

    • @wbwam7710
      @wbwam7710 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      it is a bomber designated as a fighter for budget reasons, it most certainly should get a bomber spawn

    • @mr_resource5099
      @mr_resource5099 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@wbwam7710 it was mainly labeled as a fighter so that fighter pilots wouldn't feel like getting the f117 wasn't a derank or a smudge on their rep ☠️

  • @sleepbeinshy5775
    @sleepbeinshy5775 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    The nighthawk was interesting. It was a bomber classified as a fighter, used exclusively at night so it couldnt be seen, and the stealth was so good that only one ever got shot down because a radar crew got very very lucky.
    They were not supposed to go up against other aircraft at all.

    • @FabianDialer-vw1zk
      @FabianDialer-vw1zk หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just give a groundstrike only gamemode already I would say, where both teams compete who destroys all targets first and no PvP is done.

    • @ShadowkingX
      @ShadowkingX 20 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Honestly if they wernt tipped off they wouldnt have even shot it down lol

  • @TinyBearTim
    @TinyBearTim หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    How did they add a plane that is somehow even more over tiered than a 262 and even more useless

    • @FabianDialer-vw1zk
      @FabianDialer-vw1zk หลายเดือนก่อน

      The 262 aint overtiered. historicaly it would have fought the Meteor and F80 which existed at the same time as it. What doesn't make sense is the versions with the boosters, I don't think they ever saw production.

    • @TinyBearTim
      @TinyBearTim หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ the 262 would have seen jets but mostly props
      The 262 and most of the early jets are outperformed by everything at their tier you can be in a match with a mig 15 the 262 is horrid in a up tier struggles at its tier and is better in a down tier , it fundamentally doesn’t function well with most of the things that it faces that can go faster turn better and climb quicker not to mention the flight model of a buss that makes it a task to even hit things that are moving quick the 262 doesn’t work well at 7
      And the booster versions are literally almost identical to the first one other than the booster so it’s easy to figure out what they would do

  • @williamwhitney7395
    @williamwhitney7395 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Back in the 80's the competitor that lost to the f-117 was the f-19. It had a teardrop shape, The F-19 was not chosen because while the F-117 can evade all types of radar from the front, the F-19 had to Fly specific ways depending on the type of radar it was trying to get by. The + to the F-19 was it was set up with a larger weapons bay and equipped with AAM's as well as AGM. It was also dependent on global GPS systems which is a -.

  • @gamerfan8445
    @gamerfan8445 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The Buff makes more sense than the nighthawk.

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gamerfan8445 literally though.
      Countermeasures, workable payload if not too good, defensive turret? Even similar speed lmao

  • @captain0080
    @captain0080 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    As someone said on X, they made it wrong because they hope someone will leak the real data on their forums.

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@captain0080 I’m pretty sure a Nighthawk leak has actually happened before

    • @captain0080
      @captain0080 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thesnazzycometthis game is better at uncovering military sectets than any cold war ers spy.

  • @jedispartancoolman
    @jedispartancoolman หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    They should update the bomber tree again.
    Add moder bombers, make the maps bigger, have them air spawn

  • @vokqe
    @vokqe หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I think to fix the immersion they should make it an event plane so barely anyone uses it

  • @HanzFrostedZeEngines
    @HanzFrostedZeEngines หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    I think the F117 Nighthawktuah is perfect for 3.0 👍

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@HanzFrostedZeEngines I’m amazed you’re the first person to say Nighthawktuah

    • @christopherchartier3017
      @christopherchartier3017 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thesnazzycometno Defyn did

    • @pencilcase8068
      @pencilcase8068 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Cam we please stop this. It's infuriating

    • @jeremiahpayne4364
      @jeremiahpayne4364 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I swear that hawk tuah shit so corny… She prolly can’t even nvm..

    • @christopherchartier3017
      @christopherchartier3017 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ What, SPIT ON THAT THANG???

  • @ThommyofThenn
    @ThommyofThenn หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Don't kid yourself. A bomber is still a bomber and it's still WT. You'll get shot down and your nearby teammates will continue flying in a straight line while blankly staring at the wall with perhaps a string of droll on their thigh

  • @Hun117-bj4ql
    @Hun117-bj4ql หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Gaijin be like: Put a stealth plane to a battle rating where you rarely see planes with radar missiles

    • @CheeseGrater2686
      @CheeseGrater2686 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      ITS NOT FOR AIR RB ITS FOR GROUND RB HOW DO YOU PEOPPE NOT REALISE THIS

  • @joshuaconner5887
    @joshuaconner5887 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    It sucks but it's cool and is a test bed for future stealth planes

  • @petersmythe6462
    @petersmythe6462 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When you flew up behind that person I was expecting you to slap them with your plane and send them spinning.
    When plane has no bullet, you become bullet.

  • @theironwolf1871
    @theironwolf1871 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Stealth Arado B-2 or Vateour II B
    Literally a PvE focused plane basically lol

  • @ElectrifiedGremlin
    @ElectrifiedGremlin หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why don’t they add this as a promotion vehicle to Warthunder Mobile, so when you do the challenge for it you get it for both pc and mobile for free

  • @Deebosbikerepo
    @Deebosbikerepo หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It seems to me the only way to use this thing is the way it was used historically, at night and ONLY at night.

  • @jamesstevenson9056
    @jamesstevenson9056 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    I think that stealth tech is going to be useless in the CAS role. It will be seen, it will be shot.

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      And when it gets shot, it dies very quickly

    • @BAM_BAM_XCI
      @BAM_BAM_XCI หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      that's the thing the night hawk shouldn't be able to be locked from the ranges it is being locked at in game

    • @Sleepjng
      @Sleepjng หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@BAM_BAM_XCI Yes and no, stealth planes have nearly no difference to modern radar below lets say 10 km but this thing went aiganst early cold war sophisticated SAM which absolutely couldnt lock it at those distances, instead of solving this gaijin should just change the game and not the plane
      Same happedned with grom 1- could kill bases without having to go thru 200 fox 3 so they removed the grom instead of making the game actually enjoyabel

    • @BAM_BAM_XCI
      @BAM_BAM_XCI หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @Sleepjng yes they do, but it doesn't matter the radar. Not to mention, anything Russian isn't modern relative to American systems irl. Or the fact that iran can't detect F-35s with "modern" russian radars

  • @mernyr
    @mernyr หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Been cool if in air RB it didn’t get “spotted” until you would get within 5 or so kilometers of it.

    • @stylker5604
      @stylker5604 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Угу ещё нужно перк шестое чувство добавить и лампочку обнаружения

    • @BiscuitDelivery
      @BiscuitDelivery หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why? Just have low-band radar get a rough position on it at considerable range and then have it go hard lock on high-band once it's within range, like Zoltan Dani did when his crew shot down an F-117 over Yugoslavia. Low RCS only goes so far.

  • @Quadrenaro
    @Quadrenaro หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    They should make it 7.0 for shits and giggles.

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Quadrenaro please no

  • @WeeWoo6up
    @WeeWoo6up หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    They should just make rewards for bombers destroying bases a lot higher, then maybe it would have a purpose in air rb, along with that give strike aircraft higher rewards for killing ground targets and less for bases

  • @petersmythe6462
    @petersmythe6462 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm honestly surprised they are adding this. It's an attacker without a gun or missiles or even many bombs. It's stealth but like.. all it can do is bomb a couple things. I guess it might see use in ground RB but I don't see how anyone would want to use it in air RB. The whole design of it is to minimize player interaction.

  • @ThePointlessBox_
    @ThePointlessBox_ หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Realistic air needs a new gamemode with objectives not just a deathmatch

  • @coced
    @coced หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think they just added it to showcase the new radar cross section mechanics, and make so easy money out of it

  • @Zelva_484
    @Zelva_484 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hey snazzy, quess what? It got a drag chute at least

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Zelva_484 it does? When I tested it it didn’t

    • @Zelva_484
      @Zelva_484 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@thesnazzycomet it was added day or two after in a dev update

  • @petersmythe6462
    @petersmythe6462 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They added a flying cybertruck.

  • @memestercreamster1112
    @memestercreamster1112 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Gonna be interesting when the last players on each team just so happen to be in this shitbox

  • @NIX_lost
    @NIX_lost หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As someone at around that br, I’m happy to take a lot of free kills

  • @MrPanzer234
    @MrPanzer234 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    And it’s way too detectable to be like its real life counterpart. Ir missiles are way too powerful against it and the plane is only stealthy facing it directly head on? Why? It should be stealthy from most angles except for directly above and below. IK they debuffed because of balance but I’m thinking they made it a bit too weak. What do you guys think?

    • @Sleepjng
      @Sleepjng หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      From behind its agruably the least stealthy due to exposed engine fan blades

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrPanzer234 it’s incredibly weak, such limited capability in air rb. If it’s only useful in one game mode why add it in the first place?
      And what’s worse, why add it when it’s a plane designed to basically fly solo and not in an environment with enemies. Basically an offline mode plane

    • @MrPanzer234
      @MrPanzer234 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Sleepjng I thought they weren’t exposed? I believe that the f117 used a special system to reduce its infrared signature. Like covering the exhaust with vents and lining it with special materials. Can you explain what you mean in more detail? I would like to understand where you are coming from.

    • @MrPanzer234
      @MrPanzer234 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thesnazzycomet mostly true. But I’m still getting it asap when the update drops

  • @logicmaster756
    @logicmaster756 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Reason:Hide from what?

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@logicmaster756 missiles, I guess

    • @vaultence9859
      @vaultence9859 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@thesnazzycomet The radar missiles at... 8.7?

    • @ICECAPPEDSKY
      @ICECAPPEDSKY หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@vaultence9859ground rb is 10.0 for it.

    • @danielnoahalie9186
      @danielnoahalie9186 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Airbase AA is the only place u r gonna find missles in large numbers, probably.

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@vaultence9859 hey I got killed by one in the video 😂

  • @Kapik1081
    @Kapik1081 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    While it might be useless by itself it might still give Gaijin some insights on how stealth can work in game, so when planes like F-35 get added their stealth won't be completely jank. Additionally, who doesn't like stupid gimmick vehicles. Their might be shit in reality but are gold within our hearts.

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Kapik1081 basically give them insight on what not to do

  • @zrty6512
    @zrty6512 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This plane would work great in sim and the stealth works but in air RB and ground RB it won’t work great

  • @rmackay007
    @rmackay007 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sim player here, and I think each player has the way they like to play. Im an airplane nerd and am overjoyed by the 117! I think in sim it can find a place to be useful was my point.

  • @colbym7610
    @colbym7610 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is just the Arado at a higher tier and I’m honestly happy with that.

  • @barnykirashi
    @barnykirashi หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In my opinion vehicles like this should get a BR increase.
    The K9 VIDAR, M109, Bkan, F-117.
    These vehicles are all gimmick vehicles, that don't really work better or worse based on BR, but they still ruin all immersion.

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Makes a lot of sense to be honest! The SPGs you mentioned have remained in use in the 1980s and later in some cases, and because they derp any tank with HE regardless of armour, why put them at 7.0 or lower?
      Your point makes a lot of sense and I agree, it’s not like these tanks are armour dependent, and I’d rather see an M109 fighting in a match with T-62s than Tiger 2:

    • @barnykirashi
      @barnykirashi หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@thesnazzycomet For a bit more detail.
      These are all vehicles that are by no means competative, and are not supposed to be competative.
      The Artillery Guns do the same exact thing at 6.7 as they would be doing in 7.7-11.7
      They have no armor to speak of, and all they have is a huge HE shell that may or may not overpressure a target. Throwing them against World War II vehicles don't help them at all, but it does ruin the immersion for every other player. And meanwhile people still take them up to higher BR as a meme, like the FV4005, KV-2, Ho-Ro, and the rest, none of these vehicles are particularly good anyways, they are funny, gimmicky, but not strong, and are not meant to be competative, but in War Thunder, vehicles like that have a place. Nobody forces you to play these vehicles, but if you do want to, the opportunity is given. You will never be strong in them, but it is fun to wreck someone, especially if you're wrecking an Abrams with a world war two bunkerbuster. You only ever meet a KV-2 in high tiers every so often, and it's not like something you ever think about encountering, and you can laugh if you did get killed by grandpa.
      That said, the Artilleries have no reason to face World War II, and early cold war tanks all the time, specifically because they are ruining the immersion for no particular positive.
      It's not fun, playing the King Tiger, perpetually facing cold war tanks, and having a real hard time anyways, only to be shot 3 times in 5 seconds by a K9 VIDAR, and dying to the second shot anyways.
      However meeting a K9, Bkan, or M109 in higher tiers does not take away from the immersion anyway, and it's less annoying.
      The F-117's problem is that it is a gimmick plane.
      You get funny stealth, which doesn't work too well, but it is there, and you look weird. And that's about it.
      If it was up to me, I'd throw it up to 9.7 to 12.0 give it a big SL booster in Air RB exclusively, and artificially increase it's bomb damage to deal with 2 bombs enough to take out one base reliably.
      No immersion problems, and the plane is now a fun gimmick. You can try to bomb a base, and if you make it, you'll get a nice reward in SL. If you don't that's okay.
      The thing is you can't lower it's BR, or it is fast enough to never be caught, while simultaneously too useless to do anything at all. You can however push up it's BR. For the plane that does not matter anyways, as it has to be catchable, and it does not have any Air combat capabilities wether it's at 8.7 or 10.3
      It does not have a negative effect on the plane, as it's performance relative to it's peers remains unchanged.
      It does have a positive effect on the gameplay, because it does not ruin immersion in 8.7
      TBH, Gameplay is the most important then comes Immersion, and then Realism. It sounds wrong at first, but think about it more.

  • @BAM_BAM_XCI
    @BAM_BAM_XCI หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    its cause they model it wrong just flat out, low fidelity radar and irst shouldn't be able to lock it from the distances it does in game

  • @angelicafernandez9831
    @angelicafernandez9831 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    War thunder players: we want modern bomber
    Gets add
    War thunder players: but is usuless😢

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@angelicafernandez9831 no one said anything about modern, we just want more bombers

  • @Alex-zd7qh
    @Alex-zd7qh 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    F-117 is flying glass box with 2 bombs

  • @haydenagnew
    @haydenagnew หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It the perfect aircraft to add it tests stealth in the game and has no way to break the game

  • @Shawn-c5q
    @Shawn-c5q หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's ok, they just rolled it out, give them time and they will make it worse.

  • @pencilcase8068
    @pencilcase8068 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It doesn't get aim 9Bs even💀. Why would anyone play this. It sucks at being a bomber and if sucks in ground battle

  • @floofles9473
    @floofles9473 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Honestly, they should never have added the Nighthawk. Stealth has no place in a game like War Thunder. Stealth itself is already hard enough for enthusiasts to understand, let alone the Nighthawk specifically. There's no way Gaijin can model stealth even remotely accurately, regarding radar cross-section (RCS). Right now, all the Nighthawk is and all it most likely will be is a gimmick, not a game-changer, and certainly not as useful as some higher BR or even lower BR strike/fighters aircraft. It’s still relatively easy to get a lock on it (at least from the dev server test footage I’ve seen). If Gaijin actually made it as stealthy as it really is, people would just complain about it being overpowered. They should never have brought it into the game. There were plenty of other aircraft they could have used as squadron vehicles: the Northrop flying wing bombers, the XP-67 Moonbat (one of its variants would have been incredible), or even the XF-84H Thunderscreech. Sure, it never had guns in real life, but they could just give it the Thunderstreak’s gun setup and bomb load. For CAS, an awesome addition would have been the A-37 Dragonfly, statistically one of the most effective ground support platforms of the Vietnam War, outside of the Skyraider which probably did a bit better, considering that big, beautiful monster’s reputation.

    • @madkoala2130
      @madkoala2130 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Considering some parts of F-117 are still classified means that stealth no matter what could never be accurately modeled. This is either just testing ground how far they can go with aircraft or they are just adding it for clicks.

    • @MrPanzer234
      @MrPanzer234 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I should have read this before posting my comment. You cover some of the same things I mentioned.

    • @floofles9473
      @floofles9473 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrPanzer234 what did you comment if i may ask? you said some i'm assuming i didn't think of a few things to say.

    • @floofles9473
      @floofles9473 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@madkoala2130 honestly if its just for clicks there are still plenty of other aircraft they could have added like the su-47, F-15 STOL/MTD, the F-16XL. The f-117 personally in my opinion wasn't even the best option for clicks they could have added. Its something they really shouldn't have added I still think as a squadron vehicle the A-37 would have been a better strike option. If they are testing things then honestly that makes me worried about future additions.

    • @madkoala2130
      @madkoala2130 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@floofles9473 then we can expect f-22 in less then 2 years, unless USAF or Lockheed puts a copyright on that to stop them (since gun companies were doing that for few years by now).

  • @argon9016
    @argon9016 หลายเดือนก่อน

    depending on what kind of guided bomb, laser guided gbu, jdam they work differently

  • @garethcairncross3312
    @garethcairncross3312 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When the RWR speaks Serbo-Croatian

  • @민원기-m6h
    @민원기-m6h หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Night Hawk should be played as how it was operated in real life fly it only at night battles and only in mixed battles

  • @mattcooper6591
    @mattcooper6591 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If only we got night battles because I’m pretty sure I’ve only had 1 in a year and I’ve had night battles selected the entire time

  • @mr.morkite1598
    @mr.morkite1598 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A new, defenseless bomber gets added in my BR (easy kill in air RB!) :D
    Its only in my nation D:

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mr.morkite1598 literally me

  • @metro_893
    @metro_893 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    whatever can be said on this. its gonna be good on sim on any br

  • @Operator588
    @Operator588 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    its a perfect revenge bomber for hightier

  • @redtsar
    @redtsar หลายเดือนก่อน

    Stealth aircraft should not be added in this game imo
    I love the aircraft but this aircraft does not fit the gamemodes currently available in WT
    I'm annoyed we got this and not the BUFF or my favorite bomber, Tu-95

  • @theilluminatedone9214
    @theilluminatedone9214 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Having the F-117 makes more sense than having israel in game.

  • @wilburyplays
    @wilburyplays 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Idk why but the thumbnail reminded me of that black adam meme

  • @charlieharris2864
    @charlieharris2864 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So this aircraft is going to be the first stealth aircraft in war thunder?, OK: well I'm not complaining but again in all honesty I would have preferred a B47, or a ho18a flying wing, or the even the YB 49 or the xb35 flying wings, but anyway I'll definitely still pick up this aircraft parli do because I would think it would look very good in German markings from the second World War

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@charlieharris2864 I think we would all rather any of those planes you said

    • @charlieharris2864
      @charlieharris2864 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@thesnazzycomet which is why i've started playing world of warplanes casually partly do because only downloaded that game because the aircraft in that game are far more interesting than some bog standard boring as hell f15, i really don't get why people are so excited over another f15

    • @Janno32_
      @Janno32_ หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@charlieharris2864The issue is that there are two main groups of players in War Thunder: the World War II players and the modern players. Both groups want different things from the game. Gaijin focuses on the modern players because they make more money. I like to play modern vehicles, so I enjoy playing the new F-15 or Su-34, but I understand when someone is not interested in them. It is unfortunate that Gaijin needs to divert resources between the two groups.

    • @charlieharris2864
      @charlieharris2864 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Janno32_ Well I can understand that gaijin has to stretch resources between both groups, now if you like your modern vehicles (whatever floats you're boat) in my opinion, now I do own a few modern vehicles but I barely use them anyway, but also I think the best way to please both parties in this situation is say one patches dedicated to some modern military equipment, and then the next patch would be dedicated to World War II stuff and what if tanks and aircraft, so an example of what if aircraft and tank would be the Horton ho18a America bomber, and a example of a what if tank would be the E50, e75.

    • @Janno32_
      @Janno32_ หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@charlieharris2864 The issue is that modern players are a majority and make Gaijin more money. Since Gaijin is a commercial company, they do what makes them more money.

  • @HighwayMystery
    @HighwayMystery หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I will say as well, I think this plane may go the way the Maus did and some other vehicles that are no longer available whether being OP or just useless. Could be a collectors thing eventually? But im calling that today 10/29/24. Lets see if Im right in a few years lol

  • @unutentequalsiasi5669
    @unutentequalsiasi5669 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    is like a B-47 Stratojet, if they add f-117 why not add B-47 B-58 or B-52

  • @FabianDialer-vw1zk
    @FabianDialer-vw1zk หลายเดือนก่อน

    there is no fighting with this things, Its basicaly a Buccaner or ArradoB2

  • @legion1yt
    @legion1yt หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is more then dead on arival. No one will research this pos.

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@legion1yt they will and that’s the bad thing

  • @jamesbelcher9374
    @jamesbelcher9374 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please do a review on the T77E1, it’s a cool new AA

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’ll be round the corner :)

  • @squirrelmurderous
    @squirrelmurderous หลายเดือนก่อน

    Oh good god i can't wait for the farm... :D

  • @reaver10to10-v2
    @reaver10to10-v2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Which mean the war thunder is doesn't have any Stealth vehicle now

  • @Sleepjng
    @Sleepjng หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This plane ist useless at all, in GRB its really fun and it is an amazing test bed bc it will get loads of feedback due to being very hyped=a lot of players

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Sleepjng it basically plays the same as a strike drone so why add it in the first place?

  • @KauppaKomissaari
    @KauppaKomissaari หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It really wont work at any brbitd be a free kill at any br basically

  • @HighwayMystery
    @HighwayMystery หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Babe wake up snazzy just dropped a new vid

  • @narachi-
    @narachi- หลายเดือนก่อน

    has anyone checked out the ir signature in sensor replay?

  • @kristijanmedved6066
    @kristijanmedved6066 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Irl it can carry ir missiles

  • @Russertlog
    @Russertlog หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    you can fight a me262 lol

  • @doomskull7549
    @doomskull7549 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Same bomb load as Ju-87s

  • @ethanloveland504
    @ethanloveland504 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Serbian properganda

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ethanloveland504 ahaha

  • @YeoldeOrange
    @YeoldeOrange หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    reveling game play lmao

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@YeoldeOrange right? So interesting

  • @christopherchartier3017
    @christopherchartier3017 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The crazy part is that it’s stealthier than an Su-57 💀

    • @thesnazzycomet
      @thesnazzycomet  หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Everything is stealthier than the Su-57

    • @theironwolf1871
      @theironwolf1871 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Su 57 is supposed to be stealthy?

    • @Huewar
      @Huewar หลายเดือนก่อน

      In fact, the F 117 has a smaller size on the radar, but otherwise, the SU 57 is much more stealthy

    • @Sleepjng
      @Sleepjng หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Huewar huuh? The su 57 sated by sukhoi on their own is much less stealthy than this thing, i mean juet considering the shape but then you also account for the lack of RAM paint on the su and also the exhaust nozzle on the su which is not optimized toward loweting ir signature unlike f117