Application SWCs can receive signals with Idt data types? Or they only can receive Adt data types Also, the Actuator Sensor SWCs receives only signals with Idt data types?
Basically Application Data Types only exist in an early phase of architecture specification, because implementation specific information (e.g. basetypes) is not part of the Adt. So on the implementation level (C-Code) only Idts exist and only the Idt names will be seen in the code. This is the case for any kind of software incl. application SWCs and Actuator Sensor SWCs.
Thanks for this explanation, I was recently searching for this particular topic! Is it possible for you to talk about different VariableAccess roles (dataSendPoints, etc), and some usages? I've haven't had the need of using anything different to dataWriteAccess and dataReadAccess.
Application SWCs can receive signals with Idt data types? Or they only can receive Adt data types
Also, the Actuator Sensor SWCs receives only signals with Idt data types?
Basically Application Data Types only exist in an early phase of architecture specification, because implementation specific information (e.g. basetypes) is not part of the Adt. So on the implementation level (C-Code) only Idts exist and only the Idt names will be seen in the code. This is the case for any kind of software incl. application SWCs and Actuator Sensor SWCs.
Thanks for this explanation, I was recently searching for this particular topic!
Is it possible for you to talk about different VariableAccess roles (dataSendPoints, etc), and some usages? I've haven't had the need of using anything different to dataWriteAccess and dataReadAccess.
Hi Carlos, thanks for the nice feedback. We'll put this topic on our list for future videos.
Thank you
The content is good, could you provide lengthy videos 🙂👍.
@sai2211 Thanks for the nice feedback. You can find more videos incl. all our recorded webinars at www.btc-embedded.com/videos/.
very good :)
Thanks 😀