Honestly it was their lack of being able to enforce the things written that caused their weakness. But tbh now you can see it as a good thing as it shaped the way we run out society now!
I don’t even know where to begin with all the misconceptions contained in this video. The first, and most important, is that the States did not Declare their independence together, each was declaring their own independence to make the decisions of a free and independent State, but yes, they were confederates, States joined in a common cause against a common enemy. This was the problem! Each State had their own legislative assembly to make their own decisions as an free and independent State, but there was no agreement how the States would make collective decisions as a union, and which States would have more power to make the decisions, the richest States, the more populous States; how would they weight the decision making powers of the new Union? They decided on a democracy, all the States would be assembled as equals with equal suffrage to reach a majority consensus of ALL THE STATES AS THE UNION, and the Union assembled in Congress would be the sovereign! This required a legislative process to govern their collective decision making, and that legislative process is “consensus choice”, which is a two phase process where a quorum must identify and rank choices that must be considered by all the States to determine the choice by vote, 1 vote per State, and a majority of All the States is necessary to the Choice. The problem with a democracy is the largest and most wealthy States are a minority, which gives them no control over the scope and cost related to government spending. Which those largest States didn’t appreciate, they thought that if they were required to pay the most, then they should have more power in making those decisions which they were required to pay for. So disparity in a democracy is not a good thing, but what about a simple republic? In a simple republic the reverse is true, the small less populous States are now the minority, and the small States have little or no power to participate in making collective decisions. So again disparity in a republic is not a good thing! This is the question that led to the drafting of the Constitution of the United States. How to address the disparity in population and wealth that exists between the States. This problem was solved by assembling the States as a Confederated (compound) Republic in a bicameral legislature, where the large States have control over the scope and cost of all matters under consideration, and the small States have control over concurrence on those choices and decisions. Today the 9 largest States can form a majority by their proportional suffrage in the House, however, when those matters are transmitted to the Senate for concurrence, there are 41 States to reject those choices returning them to the House for reconsideration along with amendments to advise the 9 largest States what would be required for the concurrence of the 41 smaller States on those matters. This iterative process continues until the concurrence of both houses of congress is reached. Democracy, democratic and republican forms of government, are all based upon consensus choice to make collective decisions, because all must participate to identify and rank choices, and a majority consensus of All that are assembled is required to determine the choice. This is why I’m shocked at how we operate congress today, even something as simple as a quorum to operate, is not based on the States present, as it is required, and with the consolidation by proxy of the States representation and suffrage in Congress, the States don’t even have representation on a committee, the parties are represented on the committee, but it’s each State’s right to have one of their own representatives on every committee, and they have to be equals, meaning there is no control by majority party. These most fundamental principles have been lost, and it also distorts our interpretation of the history of our government, especially where it concerns the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of the United States.
It was not "replaced". Learn something about US contract law. Parts of the US Constitution supersede most parts of The Articles of Confederation And Perpetual Union, but not all of it. The naming of the United States of America, the creation of the union and that it is a perpetual union are still in affect. To say it is replaced by the US Constitution is like saying it replaced the Declaration of Independence. It did not. All three are active contracts signed by the legislators of all 13 colonies/original states, and all states that have been added have agreed to be equal states meaning they are subject to the same laws within the three founding documents.
You are Exactly right! They want us to believe it is no longer due to an agenda. Patrick Devine talked about this, and he’s a legend of finance and banking knowledge. Love his archived video calls, and files. Pure muscle for the American people - “we the people” know your true God-Given rights upon this American soil.
@@stevenm3330 Yes ! How much better things would've been. No empire. No Indian wars. No Mexican war. No civil war . No Great War. No 2d world war. A confederation.
![The ARTICLES of CONFEDERATION, Explained [AP Government Foundational Documents]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/oct-vb367uM/mqdefault.jpg)
In your opinion, which weakness of the Articles of Confederation was the greatest? Why?
All of it was bad. 13 sovereign states unallied was better. The constitution was even worse .
Honestly it was their lack of being able to enforce the things written that caused their weakness. But tbh now you can see it as a good thing as it shaped the way we run out society now!
i passed my history test bc of this ur amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Congratulations!!
My students and I LOVED this video! Thanks for helping us learn something new today! 😝🤩💖
Thank you for your wonderful note!! I’m so happy to hear that you and your students loved the video! 😀
My students really enjoyed your video! Thanl you for your efforts! They are very appreciated.
Thank you so much!
Thank you for uploading this video… I finally got what on earth was happening in the US at that time
this is a lifesaver for VCE in Australia! thank you for making this so clear!
Excellent quick review of the Articles of Confederation. Thanks!
Thank you, Cynthia! Your kind words mean so much to me! 😀
Thank you for this, this will help me a lot on my test. Keep it up, your doing good
Thank you so much! Good luck on your test! 😀
Great video to show my students!
Thank you so much! Your comment means the world to me!
👑JESUS IS LORD👑🙏 AND ♥LOVES♥ YOU ↩REPENT↩ AND BELIEVE IN THE ✝GOSPEL✝I LOVE YOU
Good video! Class went wild! They were just wondering why the homies and homettes cant have a lil mouth and nose action ya feel
Thank you for spitting knowledge!
this was exactly what i was looking for, thank you so much!
Very Helpful!!! Thank You😍
And now we have the opposite problem with the federal government wielding too much power.
I loved this video :)
OMG I didn't know there was a document before the Constitution! I learned something new today!
video helped. thank you for this work.
Wish we still had this over our current constitution
Brush so nice I love ur videos so much
What was it like for a small business owner under the articles of confederation?
can’t believe my history teacher assigned this
Mine didn’t. he gave us 20 pages of readings and i found this instead.
SAME BRO
This was SO helpful... Thank you!
I'm thrilled you found the video helpful! :)
Hmmm kind of like how the current federal government was extorting farmers in Burns Oregon, strange
totally radical
my study time helper :)
This wouldnt necessary be a terrible idea if this form of government had a bill of rights identical to the u.s. bill of rights
Test tomorrow and I just did weeks worth of studying in this 7 minute video. I will update what grade I made tomorrow.
Edit: I made a 100!!!
Me to lol
How'd u do
??
Cheer~~~~joined by an agreement or treaty.😊
Tatha Gata Roy
Filled case
Against
Saurav Ganguly
In
Tripura high Court
Great video!
How can these characters breathe???? Or talk???? Anyhow, nice job with the video.
Makes me wonder how we would be as a country today had we remained a Confederacy.
We wouldn’t be a country
@@dkupke, ? We’re not a country anymore now!
@@charannhare4369 we are
nice vid
Kool Beans!!!!
Fire
my son likes it!
On this cause I got a history quiz tmr
Awesome!!
Y’all need more subs fr completely forgot this shit and my test is tmrw, I love apush
Why only 12 countries agree? Where is the other one
Rhode Island wanted to do their own thing
Holaaaaa
I don’t even know where to begin with all the misconceptions contained in this video. The first, and most important, is that the States did not Declare their independence together, each was declaring their own independence to make the decisions of a free and independent State, but yes, they were confederates, States joined in a common cause against a common enemy. This was the problem! Each State had their own legislative assembly to make their own decisions as an free and independent State, but there was no agreement how the States would make collective decisions as a union, and which States would have more power to make the decisions, the richest States, the more populous States; how would they weight the decision making powers of the new Union?
They decided on a democracy, all the States would be assembled as equals with equal suffrage to reach a majority consensus of ALL THE STATES AS THE UNION, and the Union assembled in Congress would be the sovereign! This required a legislative process to govern their collective decision making, and that legislative process is “consensus choice”, which is a two phase process where a quorum must identify and rank choices that must be considered by all the States to determine the choice by vote, 1 vote per State, and a majority of All the States is necessary to the Choice.
The problem with a democracy is the largest and most wealthy States are a minority, which gives them no control over the scope and cost related to government spending. Which those largest States didn’t appreciate, they thought that if they were required to pay the most, then they should have more power in making those decisions which they were required to pay for.
So disparity in a democracy is not a good thing, but what about a simple republic?
In a simple republic the reverse is true, the small less populous States are now the minority, and the small States have little or no power to participate in making collective decisions. So again disparity in a republic is not a good thing!
This is the question that led to the drafting of the Constitution of the United States. How to address the disparity in population and wealth that exists between the States. This problem was solved by assembling the States as a Confederated (compound) Republic in a bicameral legislature, where the large States have control over the scope and cost of all matters under consideration, and the small States have control over concurrence on those choices and decisions.
Today the 9 largest States can form a majority by their proportional suffrage in the House, however, when those matters are transmitted to the Senate for concurrence, there are 41 States to reject those choices returning them to the House for reconsideration along with amendments to advise the 9 largest States what would be required for the concurrence of the 41 smaller States on those matters. This iterative process continues until the concurrence of both houses of congress is reached.
Democracy, democratic and republican forms of government, are all based upon consensus choice to make collective decisions, because all must participate to identify and rank choices, and a majority consensus of All that are assembled is required to determine the choice.
This is why I’m shocked at how we operate congress today, even something as simple as a quorum to operate, is not based on the States present, as it is required, and with the consolidation by proxy of the States representation and suffrage in Congress, the States don’t even have representation on a committee, the parties are represented on the committee, but it’s each State’s right to have one of their own representatives on every committee, and they have to be equals, meaning there is no control by majority party.
These most fundamental principles have been lost, and it also distorts our interpretation of the history of our government, especially where it concerns the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of the United States.
Yes but, what was the last state that didnt meet with the others to create the constitution, and why did the delegate not assist?
thank you.
aaa thank you smmm
w video bro
It was not "replaced". Learn something about US contract law. Parts of the US Constitution supersede most parts of The Articles of Confederation And Perpetual Union, but not all of it.
The naming of the United States of America, the creation of the union and that it is a perpetual union are still in affect. To say it is replaced by the US Constitution is like saying it replaced the Declaration of Independence. It did not. All three are active contracts signed by the legislators of all 13 colonies/original states, and all states that have been added have agreed to be equal states meaning they are subject to the same laws within the three founding documents.
You are Exactly right! They want us to believe it is no longer due to an agenda. Patrick Devine talked about this, and he’s a legend of finance and banking knowledge. Love his archived video calls, and files. Pure muscle for the American people - “we the people” know your true God-Given rights upon this American soil.
I THOUGHT THE GOVERNMENT COULD NOT TAX, THE STATES COULD. HOW DID THE GOVERNMENT RAISE TAXES 5:00
Saurav Ganguly
Has
Clised
Relation
With
Baikhau
Dalmia
Saurav Ganguly
Wife
Allowed
Saurav Ganguly
To have
Extra maretils
Relation
The states should have stayed with the articles of confederation. That would've saved America and the world a out of grief.
I LOVE AMERICA 🇺🇸 🦅🏈🏈🦅🇺🇸🦅🏈🇺🇸
So each state would have one vote and we would have no president, or judicial branch. There would be no checks and balances.
@@stevenm3330 Yes ! How much better things would've been. No empire. No Indian wars. No Mexican war. No civil war . No Great War. No 2d world war. A confederation.
@joeharris3878 ya, that's not true because Congress would have still stated wars with Indians.
@@stevenm3330 but congress would have no power to make war. If there was a war in Indiana, no one outside of that state would be required to fight.
my son likes history he is 4 grade
Of course, because why any other reason would 😂it be except school?
Lopez Maria Miller Robert Hernandez Steven
Where are there mouths though
Their*
were bozo davidshall@@davishall5117
I will not accept
Four crires
From
Saurav Ganguly
He is
Rummering
Im black
Far superior to the constitution
lol
???