@@lucasmoreno2154 I’m not talking about vehicles, I’m talking about for example fixing the in game economy, map design, power creep, br de-compression, you get the idea
Yes and we need longer lasting rounds so that you can also make more than one bombing run with the 4engine bombers, plus they should bring back the AF as a target so that the bombers have a bigger impact on the outcome of the battle
People are trying to get it into the game for years now. Gaijin had all kinds of excuses. The last one was "you say you want it, but you don´t actually want it, trust us".. and no I am not making this up, they literally said they now better what players want then the players in their bullshit Q&A video last year. Also the excuse before that was "too few players", since that excuse didnt work they came up with the "we know better what you want, then you". If you want to see it in game, try supporting the topic in the forums, but be prepared there are posts lying dead with no response on the topic for like 4-5 years.
I noticed a few things in the video that may cause misinformation. "The Type 16 Prototype" is actually one of 5 unique prototypes for the MCV, it's not even the closest to the Type 16. The prototype also wasn't called Type 16, as that number refers to the year the Type 16 entered service. This was, of course, after the Protototypes. The actual name would be "MCV No.3". The MCV No.3 also mounted the same gun as the Type 16 and was completed after the Type 93 (1993) shell was introduced, so it was able to fire the shell. Not having it is simply a balancing decision by Gaijin. Please Gaijin, clarify these things in the video to avoid misinformation. Edit: I forgot to mention that the MCV No.3 isn't simply the Type 16 without the extra armor, but has comppetely different hull and turret shapes, unlile what is said in the video.
@@hunterwhite6845 Yes, I get that. And even if I don't like that they don't use the actual name I somewhat understand why they did it. What I don't like is how some people watching this video might get the wrong Ideas as to what this vehicle is. They could have easily prevented misunderstandings like this: - "It was the third of five unique prototypes" instead of "The Type 16 Prototype", so nobody thinks this is the only one. This is especially important as the prototypes were quite different from eachother. - "The Prototype has no protective screens and thus looks a bit more angular" could be better said as "Unlike the Type 16 the prototype lacks external composites" to not make people think the Type 16 would look the same without external composites. - "For balancing reasons it doesn't get access to Type 93 rounds" instead of "The Prototype can not use the Type 93 APFSDS rounds" beacause this is straight up wrong historically. I get that the things said aren't completely wrong, either from a game perspective or just not telling the whole story, but the people watching this could acually believe this as historical facts. That could then lead to spreading false information.
@@mauswaffe well you could imagine that they aren’t going into further detail as it’s a shooting range video and not a history of pages video where they go in depth. The videos are time pressed. Also using a semi-realistic game as basis for information isn’t very smart, although they do have links on information about every vehicle when previewing it in the tech tree.
question, i noticed that there was a really great idea asked by the community, "can you play 2 players in the same vehicle?" the answer was no because of the balanced, but why not make it available in PvE or create a special mode?
And in my opinion especially strategic bombers would become a greater chance to survive because bombers like the TU 4 are on a BR were it is pretty difficult to concentrate on bombing and enemy air because those Jets have such a high climbrate that nearly every enemy on the map is every time a threat for you in the bomber, so it would be pretty good if you were 2 persons so one could be the gunner and one the pilot etc
@@TeenWithACarrotIDK Yes. They sadly are~ especially considering that it would not actually add more, instead fix massive issues with the game. But the Playerbase is at fault here aswell, most people are asking for fast matches that don´t last long. While the exact opposite would be certainly the more matching case for the games setup. I still believe that giving people options to either go fast and hard or slow and tacticool would be the best of both worlds. But then the snail comes around with "NoT eNoUgH pLaYeRs" ... (while the game is at it´s absolute peak in player count)
I feel like the usefulness of the Type 16's composite is being greatly undervalued given that in addition to the extra protection against lighter autocannons it also gives an amount of CE protection that's almost absurd, it isn't unusual to survive ATGM hits to the front of the hull with the production Type 16 even if it still hurts somewhat.
Q: With the addition of the Type 16 prototype, is there any chance to flip the scrip and give us the production Centauro Serie 1? The Serie 2 and 3 would be fantastic too.
Q: can you animate crew in open top vehicles? For example the Spj fm/43-44 it would be cool seeing the loader loading a shell, also another example could be the m901, you could see the loader loading atgms in the gun
Q: Do you guys have a tank triathlon for top tier MBTs? If so, which Shooting Range, and if not, is it a possibility in the future? Maybe if there is one and it's really old, you can do an updated version with all the new machines that have been added!
Question: How can we test drive a vehicle in the actual battle i mean not right clixk on a premium and test alone with IA, i mean in really combat with other players when yoi have a limited time to test a unit.
question, will there be a mode in the future where you can play planes, tanks and ships together? maybe PvE so as not to unbalance the game, I have already exposed my idea of the mode in the forum of the arcade land assault
Q: will we ever see IFV for china like the ZBD03 and ZBD04 airdropped light tanks? I feel it would be a good addition to china seeing they’re lacking fast light tanks.
They explained the reason why a long time ago. It had something to do with the hull guns not being all that useful for most vehicles and only recieving functionality for vehicles that "need" it. Hence why most low-tier Japanese tanks have hull MG function. The only odd ball is the M6A1 boasting its dual .50 cal hull setup
Custom load outs on lower tier air planes doesn't really make much sense. Most of the ordinance is symmetrical to keep the balance and most of the ordnance available to them are a few different types of bombs. It doesn't make sense to strap a 1000lb bomb on the right wing and a 500lb on the left. Plus theres only so many hard points to attach them to as well so even though a plane could carry 2 1000lb bombs, it doesn't mean it can do 1 1000lb and 2 500lb ones
Q: Are there any plans to improve the economy and progression system in the game? Right not it takes a really long time to progress through the tiers and not everyone have the luxury of time. Best regards,
Its a heavy so not much can do damage to it unless it artillery like stug so you can really play it how you want but most people play it as a long range "sniper" whilst the rest of use using light and medium tanks distract the enemy.
The problem with long range is the 76mm has horrible range, so you could only use the 40mm for the most part. I usually prefer to use it in urban warfare
did you shoot the server room? I dont get it, why isn't there any communication between the devs and the community? Also small compensations for down time would improve the unrest of the players, because they feel like gaijin doesn't care about them.
Did you forget to mention IR-guided munitions such as the AGM-65D on the Harrier GR7 or A10? Or are they in the same effective boat as some of the other muntions?
Those aren't "IR-guided" like say a Sidewinder is. You still use the camera to select a target same as an AGM-65B, the missile just uses the target's thermal signature to contrast it from the background. They did actually go over these - 10:53
Question: When will the M109 Paladin Artillery Vehicle for America be added. USA is the only main tech tree without a Self Propelled Howitzer. I believe the hull has already been added on the 10.0 M975 Roland SAM.
Could it be possible in the future to have first person view for all the gunner positions, it would be nice if there was a button to toggle for 1st or 3rd person like the option for 1st or 3rd person for single-seat gunners on some aircraft
Question: when will we chance to have a new Abrams in the American tank tree such as M1A2 V2 with reactive side armor with CROWS system and .50 Cal coax mounted on the top of the main gun and finally desert tan as its default skins or M113 with a TOW missile launcher mounted and .50 Cal coax on the top.
Hi Shooting Range Crew! When it comes to Helicopter gameplay, will you be introducing customized loadouts? Like taking Rockets and the 20mm with the AH-1G?
Q: what is the best way to grind planes because I have some some low tier planes but medium tier tanks and the planes don't do that good but I can't figure out the best way to grind the planes to get the br up
Q. Will air vehicles ever have any sort of negative affects on them in ground battles? Mainly bad weather or fog? Currently they're flying with clear open skies and maybe a single cloud if anything at all when in real life fighting in fog or bad weather wouldn't really be a thing especially in lower BRs
Battles with fog and rain do happen occasionally - I've played a couple and they make CAS much more difficult. But I think they should show up far more often.
@@mrshark1757 the few times I've seen them made it so air fighting is slightly harder but the fog or clouds aren't low enough so all a plane has to do is fly 200m above the ground and be perfectly fine
Is it only for me that the servers arent working?? I sign in and im in the hangar and it says operation failed and then says please sign back in. It will not let me in a match either..
That will most likely never happen. I am quite sure they already stated that somewhere but looking at how it went with the french reserve tanks.. it will not be coming I think.
@@southernwolfgaming Well doesnt make any difference, they would be pretty much on the same level as the Po-2 and worse. So just a waste of time and pointless since Gaijin will never add anything below "reserve" and tbh the Po-2 is only in the game because it´s a ancient meme. There is no point in adding anything that is severly underpowered.
@@Fischbroetchen2k well you and everyone else seem to forget that without WW1 aviation we wouldn't have the WW2 or the modern junk the WW1 era is being forgotten and it is wrong underpowered or not the pilots of the day used them to their advantage and so can any GOOD gamer. But I guess you have to be good to understand that
1. The F104S.ASA RWR in sim doesn't work right, it beeps when getting pinged or spiked but doesn't show where from. 2. When are you going to make Japan more historically accurate? Zero's should compress real bad or wing rip past 320 - 340 knots depending on the model. They don't and can reach over 350 knots no problem in a dive. The only Japanese props that could dive and not compress so bad was the Ki-61's, Ki-100's, J7W1, ect. You have the energy fighters and turn fighters of Japan backwards. The turn fighters dive no problem, the energy fighter compress and wing rip easily. It needs switched.
Guided missiles have to be able to communicate with the launch platform in order for them to make it to the intended target. This communication takes place either through a thin copper wire, or a in the case of wireless missiles, tracker located at the rear of the missile that recieves input from the launcher. If the launch platform is moving more than a few miles per hour, it creates enough instability in the tracking system that it becomes much harder for the missile to track where the sight is telling it to go.
(Week 15 of asking) Hello Gaijin, could you do a video/segment on the Soviet SB-2/Ar-2 bomber family? Also, it's pronounced 'M.A.N.': Maschinenfabrik Augsberg-Nürnberg. (3:50)
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 84 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ก้องศึก vs เมืองไทย"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3kuzsAIDf1c/mqdefault.jpg)
Really enjoying the best event of this year, "Operation Timed Out"
Lol
Took me a second
Accurate
yea same
Same Lmao
In this episode, we feed the server hamster acid to improve cilent stability
Haha, just today i was getting kicked from matches lol
Same
Me when 5 minutes wait at 4.0 air rb
This week has been aweful
I couldn’t even play 😂
Challenge idea: do something the player base wants
Or something that works
Like fixing the servers.
tbf almost all the vehicles added are asked by the playerbase
@@lucasmoreno2154 I’m not talking about vehicles, I’m talking about for example fixing the in game economy, map design, power creep, br de-compression, you get the idea
That's too much for them.
Can you guys make a shooting range explaining all aircraft radars?
Look up a guy called Tim’s Variety, he has great videos explaining the different types of radar operation in detail
They alread made It
@@casualchad627 Hell yeah Tim does an excellent job explaining in-game mechanisms
@@casualchad627 amazing channel with explainations and revieuws, he realy knows what hes talking about
question : will we ever get a metal beasts on the servers?
im dead
Q: Do you have any plans to improve bomber gameplay? Like introduce some sort of incentive for fighters to defend them
Yes and we need longer lasting rounds so that you can also make more than one bombing run with the 4engine bombers, plus they should bring back the AF as a target so that the bombers have a bigger impact on the outcome of the battle
asking gaijin to improve the game mechanics has a lower chance of becoming a reality than getting 5k eagles in thunder show.
@@CatWithAOpinion but there is still a small Flame of hope, I mean FPE for planes also got implemented
@@majorklinkov2394 The enduring conflict air battles were really good when they happened. Longer form, objective based!
Q: will you add realistic enduring confrontation for planes? Considering i am not the best at simulator battles.
Um also not the best, but man, playing, and dying a lot, can really help u to get good, even me, who is not that of a player still get kills
There was ec in realistic for a limited time in 2020 i think, was fun
People are trying to get it into the game for years now. Gaijin had all kinds of excuses. The last one was "you say you want it, but you don´t actually want it, trust us".. and no I am not making this up, they literally said they now better what players want then the players in their bullshit Q&A video last year. Also the excuse before that was "too few players", since that excuse didnt work they came up with the "we know better what you want, then you". If you want to see it in game, try supporting the topic in the forums, but be prepared there are posts lying dead with no response on the topic for like 4-5 years.
I noticed a few things in the video that may cause misinformation.
"The Type 16 Prototype" is actually one of 5 unique prototypes for the MCV, it's not even the closest to the Type 16.
The prototype also wasn't called Type 16, as that number refers to the year the Type 16 entered service. This was, of course, after the Protototypes. The actual name would be "MCV No.3".
The MCV No.3 also mounted the same gun as the Type 16 and was completed after the Type 93 (1993) shell was introduced, so it was able to fire the shell. Not having it is simply a balancing decision by Gaijin.
Please Gaijin, clarify these things in the video to avoid misinformation.
Edit: I forgot to mention that the MCV No.3 isn't simply the Type 16 without the extra armor, but has comppetely different hull and turret shapes, unlile what is said in the video.
Good luck with that.
I feel as they classified it as the “type 16 (p)” to give a quick description as to what it is closely resembling.
@@hunterwhite6845 Yes, I get that. And even if I don't like that they don't use the actual name I somewhat understand why they did it. What I don't like is how some people watching this video might get the wrong Ideas as to what this vehicle is.
They could have easily prevented misunderstandings like this:
- "It was the third of five unique prototypes" instead of "The Type 16 Prototype", so nobody thinks this is the only one. This is especially important as the prototypes were quite different from eachother.
- "The Prototype has no protective screens and thus looks a bit more angular" could be better said as "Unlike the Type 16 the prototype lacks external composites" to not make people think the Type 16 would look the same without external composites.
- "For balancing reasons it doesn't get access to Type 93 rounds" instead of "The Prototype can not use the Type 93 APFSDS rounds" beacause this is straight up wrong historically.
I get that the things said aren't completely wrong, either from a game perspective or just not telling the whole story, but the people watching this could acually believe this as historical facts. That could then lead to spreading false information.
@@mauswaffe I mean if you rely on getting information from a game and take it as fact without doing any form of your own research then you're a fool
@@mauswaffe well you could imagine that they aren’t going into further detail as it’s a shooting range video and not a history of pages video where they go in depth. The videos are time pressed. Also using a semi-realistic game as basis for information isn’t very smart, although they do have links on information about every vehicle when previewing it in the tech tree.
Man, its crazy how this episode came out considering how every 2 days the servers get DDOSed! Glad to see the snail has its ,ways'
These tips would be really usefull if the servers would work
Q: how do you guys fix the server with hitting or kicking?
Been waiting the whole week
Ty for AGM Guide!👏
question, i noticed that there was a really great idea asked by the community, "can you play 2 players in the same vehicle?" the answer was no because of the balanced, but why not make it available in PvE or create a special mode?
And in my opinion especially strategic bombers would become a greater chance to survive because bombers like the TU 4 are on a BR were it is pretty difficult to concentrate on bombing and enemy air because those Jets have such a high climbrate that nearly every enemy on the map is every time a threat for you in the bomber, so it would be pretty good if you were 2 persons so one could be the gunner and one the pilot etc
Will never happen they said it multiple times.
@@Fischbroetchen2k quite stubborn to make new game modes that would be fun, aren’t they.
@@TeenWithACarrotIDK Yes. They sadly are~ especially considering that it would not actually add more, instead fix massive issues with the game. But the Playerbase is at fault here aswell, most people are asking for fast matches that don´t last long. While the exact opposite would be certainly the more matching case for the games setup. I still believe that giving people options to either go fast and hard or slow and tacticool would be the best of both worlds. But then the snail comes around with "NoT eNoUgH pLaYeRs" ... (while the game is at it´s absolute peak in player count)
Tanks for this!
I feel like the usefulness of the Type 16's composite is being greatly undervalued given that in addition to the extra protection against lighter autocannons it also gives an amount of CE protection that's almost absurd, it isn't unusual to survive ATGM hits to the front of the hull with the production Type 16 even if it still hurts somewhat.
Q: Will wing vapor effects be added to jets?
Did you forget to mention the Kh-66 with it's Semi-Automatic guidance (found on MiG-21 PFM), or am I blind?
Will premium time be extended? For the inconvenience brought on by the DDos attacks.
Q: With the addition of the Type 16 prototype, is there any chance to flip the scrip and give us the production Centauro Serie 1? The Serie 2 and 3 would be fantastic too.
Question: can you shoot a nuke mid-air and if so, will it prevent the battle from ending?
I believe that if it detonates mid air above the battlefield it’ll actually do more damage than if it detonated on the ground
@@Manraged technically it shouldnt caus the chain reaction cant happen
Question: How soon can we expect custom load outs to be added to more post ww2 / Modern aircraft?
will they be any updates for the italian tech tree?? it needs more tanks and rebalancing
Yeah the Otomatic shouldn't have a 12rnd APFSDS cap or at least should be increased to 20. Considering every other nations IFV being far superior
Q: can you animate crew in open top vehicles? For example the Spj fm/43-44 it would be cool seeing the loader loading a shell, also another example could be the m901, you could see the loader loading atgms in the gun
Hell, I'd be good with just different models for all the crew. It looks so goofy having all crew members look identical minus the commander.
@@MrSTUPIDBRICK Yeah I hate when I shoot and the loader just sits like 🧍♂️
Q: Do you guys have a tank triathlon for top tier MBTs? If so, which Shooting Range, and if not, is it a possibility in the future? Maybe if there is one and it's really old, you can do an updated version with all the new machines that have been added!
Question: How can we test drive a vehicle in the actual battle i mean not right clixk on a premium and test alone with IA, i mean in really combat with other players when yoi have a limited time to test a unit.
question, will there be a mode in the future where you can play planes, tanks and ships together? maybe PvE so as not to unbalance the game, I have already exposed my idea of the mode in the forum of the arcade land assault
Q: will we ever see IFV for china like the ZBD03 and ZBD04 airdropped light tanks? I feel it would be a good addition to china seeing they’re lacking fast light tanks.
Yesterday I bounced the type 16 P TWICE with M774 in one match
Q1: How do I improve my skills as a tanker or a pilot?
Q2: what’s better? Type 54 or M60 RISE?
Good stuff! 👍
Q: Why do we still not have working in-hull MGs for every tank? Some tanks already have them like the Jadgpanther, so why can't the rest?
They explained the reason why a long time ago. It had something to do with the hull guns not being all that useful for most vehicles and only recieving functionality for vehicles that "need" it. Hence why most low-tier Japanese tanks have hull MG function.
The only odd ball is the M6A1 boasting its dual .50 cal hull setup
Question: will custom weapon loadouts and dozer blades ever come to lower br's?
No, gaijin doesn't seem to like low tier
@@TheOreoOverlord I just hope the Sherman dozer gets added and I can carry napalm in my AD-4
@@bmac7643 I want napalm on my p47
Custom load outs on lower tier air planes doesn't really make much sense. Most of the ordinance is symmetrical to keep the balance and most of the ordnance available to them are a few different types of bombs. It doesn't make sense to strap a 1000lb bomb on the right wing and a 500lb on the left. Plus theres only so many hard points to attach them to as well so even though a plane could carry 2 1000lb bombs, it doesn't mean it can do 1 1000lb and 2 500lb ones
Q: i just got an epic replay and i want to send it in, but im on console, so how do i?
Do you plan to put gen 5 fighters in the game?
Yes Hellenic airforace F4 in the thumbnail lets go
Q: Are there any plans to improve the economy and progression system in the game? Right not it takes a really long time to progress through the tiers and not everyone have the luxury of time. Best regards,
Never- this is Gaijin we are talking about
Any tips on how to use the HVM stormer with the star streak missile?
Point and click.
Question: Is the Churchill 1 a more close-ranged tank or have I been using it wrong?
Its a heavy so not much can do damage to it unless it artillery like stug so you can really play it how you want but most people play it as a long range "sniper" whilst the rest of use using light and medium tanks distract the enemy.
The problem with long range is the 76mm has horrible range, so you could only use the 40mm for the most part. I usually prefer to use it in urban warfare
Q: when will war thunder servers be normal
did you shoot the server room? I dont get it, why isn't there any communication between the devs and the community? Also small compensations for down time would improve the unrest of the players, because they feel like gaijin doesn't care about them.
Did you forget to mention IR-guided munitions such as the AGM-65D on the Harrier GR7 or A10? Or are they in the same effective boat as some of the other muntions?
Those aren't "IR-guided" like say a Sidewinder is. You still use the camera to select a target same as an AGM-65B, the missile just uses the target's thermal signature to contrast it from the background. They did actually go over these - 10:53
Gaijin...How long does your server survive from DDoS attack? My friend and I suffered from being kicked from Match while playing and got lock 6 minute
How do you use a fire control system to calculate the required lead?
Question: When will the M109 Paladin Artillery Vehicle for America be added. USA is the only main tech tree without a Self Propelled Howitzer. I believe the hull has already been added on the 10.0 M975 Roland SAM.
Will we have the choice to choose where we store our ammo in the future in Tanks?
Could it be possible in the future to have first person view for all the gunner positions, it would be nice if there was a button to toggle for 1st or 3rd person like the option for 1st or 3rd person for single-seat gunners on some aircraft
"Don't forget that TV missiles can't connect to your XBOX or PlayStation"
Dang it !
My favorite part of recent gameplay is ‘operation timed out’
Copy lmaoo
Q: when looking the airplanes in X-ray mode some airplanes show that the pilot has SPI and LDR, what does that mean?
which language is that
Question: when will we chance to have a new Abrams in the American tank tree such as M1A2 V2 with reactive side armor with CROWS system and .50 Cal coax mounted on the top of the main gun and finally desert tan as its default skins or M113 with a TOW missile launcher mounted and .50 Cal coax on the top.
Question: are you guys thinking about adding the tornado to britian because britian is lacking in "fighter jets"
Q: with the development of new CAS, would we expect new countermeasures for tanks such as LWS or MAW?
Some tanks already have LWS
Q: how is your shorts maker actually using contemporary memes, unlike most other marketing teams
Question: what would be the best US 5.7 lineup for someone without premium vehicles?
Hey war thunder which round is better to use against ww2 era tanks HEAT or HESH?
Heat
Hi Shooting Range Crew! When it comes to Helicopter gameplay, will you be introducing customized loadouts?
Like taking Rockets and the 20mm with the AH-1G?
Already exists for the Israeli AH-1G.
You can take 3 FFAR pods and a 20mm (AFAIR)
Also already exists for the American Cobra as well
@@errorbyte7657 didn't know it did, i thought it was for the israeli one only
@@Jan191 just recently they gave most of the American heli’s custom loadouts
When are you going to add South Asia Tech Tree???
Question: what is the best way to use the IKV 72 on urban maps?
dont die 🤯
Hold J
Q: what is the best way to grind planes because I have some some low tier planes but medium tier tanks and the planes don't do that good but I can't figure out the best way to grind the planes to get the br up
How can I adjust the zoom inside the cockpit without it going back to its default point?
Hey.. can we pls get a permanent Playmode where we can play Naval+Ground+Air?
Would be nice.. love yall ❤️
Q: How do I use the targeting pod on the SU-22M3
Fun fact: the longest user of the Panther was France, which used it after the war, the time to rebuild.
Wait a second, when did they add lead calculator for tank gunners sight?
Q. Will air vehicles ever have any sort of negative affects on them in ground battles? Mainly bad weather or fog?
Currently they're flying with clear open skies and maybe a single cloud if anything at all when in real life fighting in fog or bad weather wouldn't really be a thing especially in lower BRs
Battles with fog and rain do happen occasionally - I've played a couple and they make CAS much more difficult. But I think they should show up far more often.
@@mrshark1757 the few times I've seen them made it so air fighting is slightly harder but the fog or clouds aren't low enough so all a plane has to do is fly 200m above the ground and be perfectly fine
Actually I’m enjoying timing out you know what make this event longer again because I’m pissed
Is the A-37 coming to the game?
"Operation Timed Out"
Really enjoying the new features, you know, the 38 packet loss and DDOS in Air RB, just me tho ig.
Is it only for me that the servers arent working?? I sign in and im in the hangar and it says operation failed and then says please sign back in. It will not let me in a match either..
Now planning to add the br of x.5? I think you still didn't realize, that you have a br problem.. it is too compressed and needs a decompression.
"you can expect more in the future"
Come on, was expecting some sweet teaser for the next major update regarding Gen 4 fighters.
hey I got A question.. why does the KPz-70, need so much research for its modules compared to other Tanks in same br..?
Could you guys do a video on the Maus
Question: What is the best top round for all MBT tanks in the game?
DM53 at 653 pen for the leopard 2A6 currently
Will we be seeing more Finnish ground vehicles such as the leopard marksman, BMP-2MD or ITO 12 in the future?
Question: when can we expect some WW1 fighters and bombers in the game?
That will most likely never happen. I am quite sure they already stated that somewhere but looking at how it went with the french reserve tanks.. it will not be coming I think.
@@Fischbroetchen2k I said fighter and bombers. I didn't say anything bout tanks.
@@southernwolfgaming Well doesnt make any difference, they would be pretty much on the same level as the Po-2 and worse. So just a waste of time and pointless since Gaijin will never add anything below "reserve" and tbh the Po-2 is only in the game because it´s a ancient meme. There is no point in adding anything that is severly underpowered.
@@Fischbroetchen2k well you and everyone else seem to forget that without WW1 aviation we wouldn't have the WW2 or the modern junk the WW1 era is being forgotten and it is wrong underpowered or not the pilots of the day used them to their advantage and so can any GOOD gamer. But I guess you have to be good to understand that
@@Fischbroetchen2k LONG LIVE THE RED BARON AND SACRED GERMANY
Q: What is the highest millimeter cannon in war thunder that anyone can research/operate?
In ground forces the FV4005 with 183mm
what country is it and what tier i wanna check it out
@@pointman2 rank IV , British, br 6.7
@Carlos Mendoza thank you
wait wouldn't it be a ship since their guns are huge?
what 4th gen fighters can we except in the next update, and is it going to be a big one as it is after all war thunder's 10th anniversary!!
Mig-29, F-16, J-10, Tornado ADV
Total chaos
@@ssh6659 absolute chaos
Hei Gaijin, Do you have plan to change opening the Shooting Range's MBT from Strv 122 to other MBT?
I hope Merkava Mk.4M as replacement
Why? Is it so important?
@@carsamba0055 it’s not but it would be cool if they cycled the opening MBT from all nations just to give a little showcase and add some more pizzazz
You're asking gaijin to do more work?
@@chiefturion7134 imagine gaijin is working
What's the likelihood of more prototype vehicles being added to aviation trees?
1. The F104S.ASA RWR in sim doesn't work right, it beeps when getting pinged or spiked but doesn't show where from.
2. When are you going to make Japan more historically accurate? Zero's should compress real bad or wing rip past 320 - 340 knots depending on the model. They don't and can reach over 350 knots no problem in a dive. The only Japanese props that could dive and not compress so bad was the Ki-61's, Ki-100's, J7W1, ect. You have the energy fighters and turn fighters of Japan backwards. The turn fighters dive no problem, the energy fighter compress and wing rip easily. It needs switched.
Q: are you planning to add a aircraft on Greek ?
In this episode we plug 1 more potato to the power supply of the servers (for a total of 2 potatoes and a lemon)
Q : why are most ATGM carriers unable to shoot on the move ?
its maybe because they don't have a stabilizer for their guiding laser / Towing cable ?
@@paramite67 the IT-1 is able to fire on the move idk how
Guided missiles have to be able to communicate with the launch platform in order for them to make it to the intended target. This communication takes place either through a thin copper wire, or a in the case of wireless missiles, tracker located at the rear of the missile that recieves input from the launcher. If the launch platform is moving more than a few miles per hour, it creates enough instability in the tracking system that it becomes much harder for the missile to track where the sight is telling it to go.
@@Red_Four except for Russian missiles. Those dont count
@@Red_Four oh I see thanks
Will any non-battle pass event vehicles come back to the game? I’d love to see the AC-1 back
Like why did he add that last part? Now Xbox and PlayStation players are going to be confused.
Q: is there any plans to ad the tornado to warthunder
No question here, I just love your game guys.
T-129 ATAK for the next ''Metal Beasts'' please
Q: What is the best japanese Rank 2 Ki plane?
Wait what?! It does the lead too?
Q: dose the ADATS have IRST? if so how do i activate it?
It is on by default but has a limited cone of sight. If you turn off your radar you can lock targets using irst but with limited fov.
@@aniketdaptardar1 Helis and Aircrafts still gets the my Radar ping anyway. even if i kept my Radar off the moment i lock into them they know.
War thunder took my soul
(Week 15 of asking) Hello Gaijin, could you do a video/segment on the Soviet SB-2/Ar-2 bomber family?
Also, it's pronounced 'M.A.N.': Maschinenfabrik Augsberg-Nürnberg. (3:50)
Q: Will we able to see some smaller nation vehicles such as the Sabrah ASCOD 2 Light Tank and Pandur II Tank Destroyer from the Philippines
I’d rather see fixed servers than new shooting range
Q:will the battlefield AAA in Air battles get a Nerf?
Hello gaijin: which is the best tattic for the bmp2 M?