Fisher Gemini 3 First Test and Live Digs

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 48

  • @prospexican
    @prospexican 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    i had hit almost 9 feet with this kind of machine, and love using it for treasure hunting, but all my videos are in Spanish so far, i might upload some in English earlier or later. i have a feeling that in a low mineral soil i should be able to go even more deep.

  • @cowboygeologist7772
    @cowboygeologist7772 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for posting. I had only used the White's one with the cavern detector feature too.

    • @jehadjbory9270
      @jehadjbory9270 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I received a whites electronics super x500 metal detector, but without its handle

  • @maxsands3861
    @maxsands3861 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would really like to see you hunting with this detector more. Do you have more videos with this detector?

  • @moabdulhamid6839
    @moabdulhamid6839 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this demo .what is the deepest target you have found,I should bought one when I was in the states before returning to Egypt

  • @MadisonMainedetecting
    @MadisonMainedetecting 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    That two box unit looks like what we need to dig thru the snow up here in the NorthEast. GL&HH

  • @Jonathan-vx7xi
    @Jonathan-vx7xi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    hey, are you still using the Gemini 3? Was it any good?

  • @143DREWID
    @143DREWID 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    How is that boat stick on the lower back, in the cold, crouch walking?
    G-3 directional control, a '72 Country Squire station wagon bald tires, on ice.
    Perchance does it have a recumbent bicycle style support accessories.
    The E-trac is s l i g h t l y cumbersome with 13" coil,.. on sloped rough terrain.
    But G-3 on a slope, MEDIC !
    Hope you dig massive cache of coins with that oar you are fishing with.
    To your north there aren't any, so I will not need one, ha!

  • @stopatnothen
    @stopatnothen 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    my 5900, with a 15 inch loop will smoke it on them targets, but very interest in the fisher two box, I also have a garret two box, my 5900 gives that a run for the money..thanks for sharing..

    • @jehadjbory9270
      @jehadjbory9270 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello, I also have the white 5900. Is there any information about its coil? I have one coil 950

  • @dwheeUSA
    @dwheeUSA 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And what's the maximum depth detection?

  • @fallscitybob
    @fallscitybob 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I though that the normal use was to affix the receiver to the shaft in the forward position so as to be readable and trail the transmitter. What am I missing?

    • @GEODETECCIONCOLOMBIA
      @GEODETECCIONCOLOMBIA 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lo está utilizando al revés. Hasta el receptor está colocado incorrectamente, Qué absurdo.

  • @dwheeUSA
    @dwheeUSA 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it made in USA one?

  • @metaldetectingguy
    @metaldetectingguy 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    A PI will beat that. But nice to see one in action. Thanks for the video. GL & HH

  • @zeekhan8339
    @zeekhan8339 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Did this guy have the receiver head on back to front??? The most important setting is on the tuning knob... Great machine, wish it could come out with a 3d screen and depth detector...

    • @paulmcfeeters5554
      @paulmcfeeters5554 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not sure the utility companies (primary users of this style of machine) need those bells and whistles?

    • @rajakamraz5413
      @rajakamraz5413 ปีที่แล้ว

      اسلام علیکم

  • @altheasidlao1794
    @altheasidlao1794 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How much

  • @AplikasiPenjualan
    @AplikasiPenjualan 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    this can be use to detect gold only ?

    • @paulmcfeeters5554
      @paulmcfeeters5554 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's designed to locate buried pipes/cables for utility companies so it will find any ferrous metals.

  • @famous8986
    @famous8986 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have the same machines but lost her hand

  • @Mr.Technical77
    @Mr.Technical77 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I was expecting more out of this machine as far as depth. It started to fade off quicker than I would've guessed on those items.

    • @jsmith5167
      @jsmith5167 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly. I saw a lot here in this demo. It appears no different at all from a single coil unit in function. A one hander would have easily found every one of those targets, and at the same depths below the surface. Now I am wondering what he got soaked for this unit. If it has discrimination, why isn't he using it? I bought my first White's new in '69, still have it, works as good as most anything else out there today.

    • @paulmcfeeters5554
      @paulmcfeeters5554 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It "fades off quickly" because it is designed to find buried pipes/cables. It is an accurate professional tool, some folks say it will go to 15 feet but I've never had to locate a pipe that deep yet. If you watch the YT training video for the Fisher TW-6 you will see how it's designed to be used.

    • @bryanyork4848
      @bryanyork4848 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jsmith5167 your 1969 detector is not even remotely as good as newer whites technology.

    • @Mr.Technical77
      @Mr.Technical77 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@paulmcfeeters5554 the TW-6 is designed to find buried pipes and cables. The Gemini 3 is designed to find treasure.

    • @Mr.Technical77
      @Mr.Technical77 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same circuit, but tuned to different frequencies. The Gemini 3 has no conductive tracing output.

  • @musilmamine2148
    @musilmamine2148 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for video what is maximum deep can get ?

    • @martelnews
      @martelnews  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Depends. On alot of factors

  • @johnirby493
    @johnirby493 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your air tests were pitiful. My cz-6a and 1266-x can easily beat those distances on targets that big.

  • @abdjbarchafik7456
    @abdjbarchafik7456 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    سلام عليكم هال من معلومات عن جميني3

  • @jkk505
    @jkk505 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    you are not using that thing correctly. the items should be buried. at 1 point you said "well thats about 2 feet off the ground"....dude you are obviously new to this. stop making videos using equipment youve never used and dont make videos that locates things at multiple depths then try to test it by having items on top the ground at no depth.

  • @snapnpiksallthetime7672
    @snapnpiksallthetime7672 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    seems way too awkward

  • @ranewilliams9152
    @ranewilliams9152 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I see your video

  • @howtopaint3552
    @howtopaint3552 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    it sounds like child with mouth covered

    • @bryanyork4848
      @bryanyork4848 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s a creepy comment. Weirdo !

  • @urluvpac
    @urluvpac 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ur testing this on car parts and cheap metals the main purpose is meant to be for gold not car parts

    • @paulmcfeeters5554
      @paulmcfeeters5554 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      He is testing it on what he has available for the video of course. Guess he doesn't have any nuggets buried out there plus digging in frozen soil is so much more work than thawed soil.

    • @bryanyork4848
      @bryanyork4848 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not a gold machine. Won’t even pick up gold. Ferrous only.

  • @leondetectorismo4916
    @leondetectorismo4916 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    É isso aí companheiro! Pois eu também tenho um canal no TH-cam: Leon detectorismo e seu vídeo me dá mais ânimo pra continuar essa aventura. Pois se for possível se escreva no meu canal: Leon detectorismo obrigado! Que Deus abençoe sempre sua vida! Em nome do senhor Jesus Cristo.