@@Roboseal2 then do tell which ones because I have several hundred hours flying on LEAP 1As and not once have we gotten any sort of warnings or bulletins in my company regarding problems. The only one I recall is a fadec update to make the starts quicker which was at most an annoyance before that.
So glad the event was a non-event, but I'm curious of the flight crew's procedures. I ask because BOTH pilots were on the radio... Typically one person flies and the other does the radio, especially during an emergency situation, so one person can focus on flying and the other person can run checklists and radios.
In the Airbus generally pilot monitoring (PM) is on the radios, with pilot flying (PF) flying. During an emergency, the PF calls for “ECAM actions” which assigns the PM the duty of solely working the issue, reading the QRH, etc. PF is now working the radios, as well as flying the plane.
I was a police radio dispatcher in a former life. We would have emergency users (like this aircraft) switch to another frequency so they weren't fighting to be heard over routine radio traffic. That's not possible with the ATC system?
It's definitely possible. There are times emergencies are severe enough, they request a single frequency the rest of the way. I believe this one has something more to do with the various complex airspace sectors, all being individual controllers with their own freq's, both being varying degrees of lateral and vertical airspace. So I think going below 19,000' there, they may have been in an entirely different controllers space, which is also probably why a lot of aircraft went unanswered, they were probably coordinating via there line.
So now we are blaming Boeing for Airbus incidents? The only thing that makes me wanna do is to defend Boeing, because blaming Boeing for something that they have no reasonable control over is unreasonable.
Just another 'Quality Escape' from Boeing *deserves no less that scrutiny when someone thinks of them 'United 777' immediatly did make me think Probably Cause as I stated. Yes, An Airbus... not my initial point but thanks for helping me clarify better.
![[ENGSUB] UNPRODUCTIVE DAY ใช้ชีวิต (เปื่อยๆ) ด้วยกัน 1 วัน! | OUROAD CLOSEFRiEND SS2 EP.9](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pyYKZ3kra9w/mqdefault.jpg)
Great job of Aviate Navigate Communicate when he wasn't responding to the controller. "Uh... a little busy up here, we'll get back to ya" LOL
The engines are NOT made by the aircraft manufacturer! Y’all only want to blame Airbus or Boeing
nobody cares. its still on a Scarebus
@@eddieflxible379 douchebag
swa awaiting a response till this day
🤣
Wow, brand new plane
Indeed. I believe the inaugural flight with United was 12/18/23? I meant to include that in the description. Love your videos btw!
@@avocadoflightwas a few weeks earlier
These new engines (both Pratt and CFM) are fuel efficient but also quite delicate. Engineers are squeezing blood out of a turnip at this point.
But only the Pratts keep giving raging problems. The LEAPs have been far far more reliable.
They still have a few problems too @@aerialbugsmasher
@@Roboseal2 then do tell which ones because I have several hundred hours flying on LEAP 1As and not once have we gotten any sort of warnings or bulletins in my company regarding problems. The only one I recall is a fadec update to make the starts quicker which was at most an annoyance before that.
So glad the event was a non-event, but I'm curious of the flight crew's procedures. I ask because BOTH pilots were on the radio... Typically one person flies and the other does the radio, especially during an emergency situation, so one person can focus on flying and the other person can run checklists and radios.
In the Airbus generally pilot monitoring (PM) is on the radios, with pilot flying (PF) flying. During an emergency, the PF calls for “ECAM actions” which assigns the PM the duty of solely working the issue, reading the QRH, etc.
PF is now working the radios, as well as flying the plane.
@@thomasairbuspilot I get that. It sounds like they're both on the radios throughout the entire event.
I was a police radio dispatcher in a former life. We would have emergency users (like this aircraft) switch to another frequency so they weren't fighting to be heard over routine radio traffic. That's not possible with the ATC system?
It's definitely possible. There are times emergencies are severe enough, they request a single frequency the rest of the way. I believe this one has something more to do with the various complex airspace sectors, all being individual controllers with their own freq's, both being varying degrees of lateral and vertical airspace. So I think going below 19,000' there, they may have been in an entirely different controllers space, which is also probably why a lot of aircraft went unanswered, they were probably coordinating via there line.
Also, thank you for your service. Much respect to dispatchers!
It is, that's what they do at Schiphol (Amsterdam).
@@craftykoala Thanks! I went on to a long law enforcement career but loved my time as a dispatcher.
Oh I bet they're regretting getting the P&Ws instead of the LEAPs, almost zero issues with the LEAPs
Well that's too bad. United and PW have a very long relationship with each other and they are going to continue doing so.
Christ someone fly the plane and work the radios while the other pilot run the checklist/ECAM.
Right?!?
That’s a terrible flight number
ok, but how many souls ;)
Sw should piss off there is a jet engine failure
Absolutely, United 777 coincides with a Boeing type of aircraft. Had it been United 321, they wouldn't have had a problem.😂😂
The only 321 NEO in the United fleet, and a brand new airplane too. Wonder what kinda motors it has.
Pratts
Looks like they've got 4 A321NXs in their fleet now, as of 5 Feb 2024.
Great start to those 321🤣
So now we are blaming Boeing for Airbus incidents? The only thing that makes me wanna do is to defend Boeing, because blaming Boeing for something that they have no reasonable control over is unreasonable.
How is Boeing being blamed here?
@@АнастасияПетрова-с8п there was a commenter on this video who initially thought that this incident was "just another quality escape from Boeing"
@@Blank00 thanks. I didn’t see that comment.
Where are the Airbus fan boys?
Dependable Engines 🤣🤣🤣
Just another 'Quality Escape' from Boeing *deserves no less that scrutiny when someone thinks of them 'United 777' immediatly did make me think Probably Cause as I stated. Yes, An Airbus... not my initial point but thanks for helping me clarify better.
Don't get what you mean by that. Why are Boeings quality issues relevent?
Boeing doesn’t make the engines Einstein.
Because they think airbus planes are made by Boeing 😂
It's an Airbus, not a Boeing product.
Things break..