GHOSTBUSTERS: Afterlife (2021) Review
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ย. 2024
- Non spoiler review of Ghostbusters: Afterlife
/ oliverharper
www.olivers-ret...
/ ollieh82
/ oliversretroreviews
/ oliverharper1982
Join the discord! / discord
#Ghostbusters #Afterlife #GhostbustersAfterlife #GB2021 #GhostCorps #OliverHarper #Retrospective #WhoYouGonnaCall #JasonReitman
I have a drinking game that has gone on for years. Whenever Oliver refers to the Christopher Reeve Superman films whilst reviewing a non Superman film I take a sip of whisky. I've been watching his videos for years and I am now a raging alcoholic.
my condolences to your liver
Does he do that? LOL! That's adorable. Guess he really likes the Superman movie! In his review of a sad family drama: "He clutches his mother's hand, wishing he could do something to save her... Like Christopher Reeve in Superman."
Lol he does bring them up quite often
@@alexsilva28 I love Oliver but he would get a Superman reference into a review of Peter Rabbit.
HOW ARE YOU STILL LIVING?!?!?
I agree with the rushed ending. Spoiler below:
I felt we were missing a scene or two to see the originals get together and find out they have to go to the farm house.
Right? And maybe come up with a more original plan to defeat Gozer than just zapping it again
@@alexsilva28 they did. Didnt you watch the movie?
@@alexsilva28 This was original. They captured Gozer, rather that destroying them
It’s a PKE Meter not PKG.
I liked it. It was not as great as the first as that is untouchable, or even part 2. But given it was a passing of the torch, one made me feel old, but felt right. It's no longer my time anymore, but I can accept that. Good film.
I second everything you said .
45 years old now
@@ibras1428 Yeah, 46 here. I was 8 years old, turning 9 later that year when I saw GB 1 in the summer of 1984. I remember in 1984 the atmosphere was electric, it was really a movie made for adults but accessible for us children. I remember when "Ghostbusters" was one singular blockbuster movie and not a franchise, because even the people that can't remember 1984 but remember the 1989 GB 2 sequel, still remember it as a franchise of cartoons and toys. From my memory, there were a few bags, t-shirts and stickers in 1984, I used one to trick or treat that Halloween, but we had no toys until the fall of 1986 when the cartoon came out. The toy slime was particularly popular at school.
Oh, it was Much better than Ghostbusters 2 which was just….weak…and kinda pointless
@@edvaira6891 wrong. Vigo is better than stranger things busters
@@jokerfleckcast3196 an opinion is never wrong.
My second favorite Ghostbusters movie. I loved it as a HUGE fan of the franchise. This scratched every itch and felt wonderful.
Finally a proper sequel to the 2009 Videogame
The 2009 game is the only REAL Ghostbusters 3.
@@Wol1427 Still a good film tho
That game was fantastic.
The game was the real sequel
Jason accidentally decanonized it because he is friends with JK Simmons, so much so he's given him a role in every film he's made. In this case Simmons played Ivo Shandor and was killed in about 30 seconds.
I enjoyed this a lot, if critics want to call out "fan service" maybe they grudgingly couldn't find much else. As a paying customer, I am happy. It's done well to try and follow it's own path but also blending previous storylines.
This movie was really good. I’ve never seen a past member/actor honored so well my son loved it, I loved it, my dad loved it. This movie, although not perfect (who cares- what is!!!) was awesome. Just missed Rick Moranis, that’s all. Teared 3 times, which is so so rare for me.
@@TERMlNAT0R If this movie does well enough for another to be made I'm betting Slimer is what was in the containment unit at the end of the post-credit scene.
@@johnallen3033 yep. Thought the same thing. Even leaned over to my kid and said “slimer”. Let’s hope! It would be cool if they went the real ghostbusters route with slimer and he was friends/accomplice with them.
@@johnallen3033 I don't know, was Slimer ever recaptured by them after he got out of the containment unit the first time? He flew toward the screen at the end of the first movie and had a couple scenes with Louis in the second one. I guess he could've been caught again off-screen, who knows?. But, besides that, Slimer was more of a supporting character and more for comedic effect rather than the more intimidating main villain like Gozer or Vigo, so I can't see them building that up for it to just be Slimer, with all due respect.
I loved how the score incorporated the Elmer Bernstein music. That score is as big a character in the original film as anything else and it was lovely to hear that jaunty piano theme make a comeback. If only Randy Edelman had done the same thing 30 years earlier...
I really liked it despite the near constant references. The movie is very nostalgia heavy for sure. It reminded me a LOT of The Force Awakens. I think they did the same approach in order to do something new while connecting back to its roots for the sake of the original fans. Now that they have the set up out of the way I'm hoping we get a sequel that stands firmly on it's own.
I felt like Afterlife was the Star Wars Sequel Trilogy done right. It passed the torch without disrespecting everything that came before it.
@@RM2011ish Agreed.
What references? The fact that Egon had equipment and Grooberson explaining history to Phoebe?
This is what the force awakens would’ve been like if they did all the fan service correctly. Like it doesn’t matter if you make Han Solo say “chewie we’re home” if you make him act like a bumbling fool all movie and then kill him at the end
@@RM2011ish totally agree! This is what TFA should have done! This is how you honor, entertain, and pass. They desecrated the SW characters so badly.
Finally a positive review of this film. It's been kind of heartbreaking to see so many critics turn on this film either because of the debacle with the 2016 film or simply because they're exhausted from 80s nostalgia. When it comes to reviving and paying homage to an old franchise I think this is about as sincere as you can get. It's such a sweet movie and it's a shame it seems to be judged on the basis of what it's not, rather than what it actually is.
Most critics at the media are completely separated from what the audience and fans want.
Who cares what the critics think. It’s come to the point where if they love something, I’m out. Been waiting for this since 1991 when the 3rd movie was supposed to drop. We loved it.
Agree with every word of this! Stop analyzing I say and just enjoy it! 😉
I liked it but felt it was a very slow burn. Everything from the first half was very good and added a lot to the story & i dont think any of it was unnecessary. It was just like "Are we ever going to get there" That being said when the action started it was wonderful although i hope a director's cut comes out with more scenes towards the latter half of the film.
Hey Oliver Harper. I just wanted to say happy thanksgiving❤️. My grandfather passed away a few days ago. And I’m Glad, Grateful, And Thankful for you making Retrospectives that I love watching❤️. One movie buff to another❤️. I want to be a director when I come older❤️.
I make it a game. How long will Oliver go in a video before mentioning at least one of the Superman films
I hope "the driectors cut" is longer. for I agree with you. don't know if it was the reel that I watched or it was actual cuts but in places it felt jerkey, and the reel I seen did not have some of the scenes that where in the last few trailers. with that complaints about it being a recycled story. not true. how many times did we see the Joker in the batman movies in each reboot? a lot. if you watch the very start of the film you would know that this is a contiuation of that story. which was set up in the OG GB. spoilers here. I was impressed by the extra scenes in the "credits" ;) I admired they gave a good back story update to Winston and a possible launching point for another gb movie. and the scene with Dana and Peter with the tables turned on Peter. lol that was real good. ;)
I wish Jason would release an extended cut, with a longer 3rd act.
I think the over hype of fan service was for trying to get fan back into ghostbusters, due to the backlash of the 2016 reboot. Mainly because there was a car crash. But I really enjoyed afterlife
Over dose?
If the kids were young adults I think this movie would have been great. There were plot holes- like how did the OG Ghostbusters have their own proton packs when Egon took away all the isotopes with him and the proton packs used to contain the ghosts were destroyed by the keymaker (or the other doggo).
Also, destroying one nuclear accelerator with another would cause a nuclear catastrophe, no?
backups for emergencies of course
This movie had so much heart and so much good feeling to it that it's hard not to love it. Glad someone else mentioned the Goonies vibe, because I felt that a bit, too.
If only the original movie wasn't a cinical comedy...it sadly misses the whole point of the original
th-cam.com/video/PXUo5yjHCLU/w-d-xo.html
I loved this movie!! Can you explain what is fan service about this movie? From now on bill & Ted 4 shouldn't show bill,Ted or a time machine
PKE meter, not PKG
The original film is just a comedy where they run a business about ghost exterminators. All of the “seriousness” surrounding Gozer the god is laughed off nicely by Bill Murray’s dry wit and he doesn’t give a shit what’s going on. The idea is ridiculous and the film is self aware of that. This film is all schmaltz and played completely straight with no satire. It misses the point of ghostbusters. The title is a joke. The whole thing is a joke intentionally. Not an action film indie drama like Afterlife. But I at least appreciate it more than the 2016 abomination which has no attention to concise comedic timing or the chemistry of the cast. Ghostbusters 3 needed to stay consistent with the satirical nature of the first two where it poked fun at itself.
THIS
Nice to hear a more positive review of this movie, I liked seeing all those things again, I think the Half in the Bag guys were way too hard on this flick
I loved it! 9/10
Not a bad movie, though I do question how anyone doesn't know what Ghosts are or who the ghostbusters are. You'd think having definitive proof the afterlife is a thing and ghosts are real would have earth shatter consequences and have a pretty massive impact on the world and society as a whole.
Yeah, that made no sense. Also, how the hell do those kids not know that their own grandfather was a Ghostbuster? And why the hell did no one believe Egon when he said Gozer was going to come back? Not even Ray believed him? I kind of like the movie while I was watching it despite the metric shit-ton of fan service crammed into every nook and cranny, but the more I think about it, the less I like it.
We have people who believe the earth is flat and that John F Kennedy Jr was about to return and help trump back into office. So yeah I can believe that in the Ghostbusters universe there would be people who still don't believe in ghosts.
@@dmoiseyo8882
What?
@@alienboy1322 what can't you understand?
@@dmoiseyo8882
What does this have to do with Afterlife?
I loved the film myself, but even though as you say it does have it's fault, the way it was dedicated to Harold Ramos was lovely.
I saw the Ghostbusters Afterlife film last night and it was a great movie.
As a long time fan of Ghostbusters I have Ghostbusters afterlife beyond five stars.
Watched it last night. Loved it
I kinda want to see this movie. trailer made it look quite promising. but after hearing what the third act is, I have very little faith that I would like this movie. maybe if some friends wanna see it or it's on some streaming service I already have eventually, then maybe.
Can someone remind me what the credits music is from? It's always such a bop and I forget, and I don't see a credit for it
Nostalgia, fan service is fine as long as it doesn't detract from the story/writing. Really excited to watch this movie now. :)
You are in luck then. This movie uses nostalgia nearly perfectly. The references and nods to the past help move the story forward. It's a well crafted, beautiful movie that moved me to tears.
Nice review Oliver! I believe you do the spoiler free movie reviews better than even the big publications and news outlets! You say in your reviews or retrospectives what we need to hear to help us draw our own conclusions. I'm looking forward to your next review or retrospective!
It was fun enough but Ramis would have hated the ending.
Great review as always, will always wait for your review fair and Balanced 👍
Oliver it's PKE as in "Psycho-Kinetic Energy"
I really enjoyed this movie.
I had a few issues with it overall. Can't really discuss them without spoilers.
But I enjoyed much more than I disliked.
It's my 3rd favorite Ghostbusters movie.
GB - 9/10. GB2 - 8/10 GBA - 7/10
Perfect description
@@brettbaratheon9776 ghostbusters 2016 is a complete dumpster fire from beginning to end with Paul Feig being so arrogant
This was a fun movie
Agreed with your thoughts, little tweaks would have helped, like when Phoebe and Aykroyd get disconnected, a quick shot of him digging for a piece of paper then showing the address of the farm and picking up the phone, then cut away would justify them being there out of blue at end, I know we can assume that but sometimes those little moments on screen help. Little tweaks like that and a longer ending of the originals interaction and family.
I liked it, my kids liked it, It wasn't original, it was full-on fan service with the odd scare and the odd laugh along the way.
And what an ending for Harold.
It was great.
100%. Amen.
One of the greatest franchises in Hollywood history - can't wait to watch it and hope there is a trilogy at the least and with the price dropping on effects some shows would be cool as heck!!!
Obviously nothing will compare to the first 2 movies but, honestly, this movie was great and not far off from one of the ideas I wanted to see from a future Ghostbusters movie.
Didn’t want or need it, but I’m looking forward to going to the cinema to support it.
I felt the same as you before seeing the movie. However, having seen it in the cinema twice, it's quickly becoming one of my favorite movies of the past few years. It's just so damn good.
This was a good film with a very sweet ending. It made me smile more than once and thats more than I can say for most films.
Compared to RLM’s review of the movie, this feels completely opposite, a bit too positive and with very little substance or criticism.
“Nostalgia is the new cocaine”
@Avelier Plays
RLM sucks, man.
Way too cynical.
@@alienboy1322 how can you not be with all of these remakes, reboots and cash ins that all they use is nostalgia to sell shitty plastic toys to 40 year olds?
@@AvelierPlays
Am I missing something?
I just love that Canon Films logo theme song at the beginning of this video.
Didn't except much from this one but it blew away my expectations. Feels like a love letter to the original and an apology to the abomination that was the all female Ghostbusters. Felt like an 80's movie brought forward to the present day. Shots are held much longer than movies today.
Fair enough review, uhm i found the movie boring in the middle, it started out strong and i was invested, but then the middle happnend and they kept on teasing the original ghostbusters, and i felt like the old score was overused as to say "see see we got the old music back too" and Finn wolfhard was sorely wasted in this film, he barely had any funny lines, or interacted with pod cast and phoebe which i think was a missed oppurtunity, and i was hoping to at least see Dan Aykroyd as a sort of reluctant guide to hlep phoebe, and yeah the ending felt rushed. 6/10
See the Mark Kermode review? Turned my stomach!!!! Im a 38 year old man. I would have cried at the end if my kids werent there. Very, very emotional!!!!!!!!! Loved it
He can be really quite rude when giving a bad review. Like when he talked over the viewer correspondence Simon was reading aloud.
He’ll often let a grudge hold over parts of the show. In this case, his disagreement with the poor reception of Ghostbusters (2016). He’s also done it with Clint Eastwood, or when he goes all quiet and cold like a moody teenager if Mayo even flippantly mentions the PM.
Mark Kermode is a good film critic, and I often agree with him, but I can’t really stand him as a person. He perfectly exemplifies that out of touch, upper middle class empathy bullshit that rots the BBC to the core.
@@spookylemon4947 A perfect narration of him in my opinion. He said he wanted it to be so different yet champions the 2016 version which was the same ALL the way through with the cast of Bridesmaids. He is the example of the dad who wants to be cool rather than what he thinks! COuldnt believe he rated that over this. I was annoyed with that film. Not because it was women, but because they just ignored the previous film/s we loved and the fan base was built on! But guess that means I hate women! Which I dont. I have a wife and daughter I tell never to feel 2nd best. But this film was the right mix. Yes it was similar but if it was too different it wouldnt be ghostbusters! Great shout!
Like a lot in the media he used Ghostbusters 2016 as a way to attack people he doesn’t like. GB16 became Hillary Clinton and its dissenters the Trump wave in this weird proxy war.
My kid was with us and he loved it. We’ve also shown him both of the originals. I loved it. Teared 3 times. Not perfect, but what we fans needed for sure.
I mostly respect Kermode as a critic, but he has this unpleasant habit of automatically dissing a movie if it’s directed in a way that doesn’t go with his values, or he just dislikes the director. I’ve nothing against the 2016 film being a different story, or having all female GB, but it was just a genuinely terrible movie! Kermode only liked it because it was politically correct to like it...not on whether it was good as a movie or not. Which makes his critical assessment of it flawed. He’s one of those critics who acts like some cultural gatekeeper, and we fans are obviously just idiots.
While it was far better than the 2016 film,which isn't saying much, it's not really a great film. I have to agree with Mike,Jay and Rich from Redlettermedia. It felt like a collection of-do you remember the fire pole? Do you remember the Proton Pack? Remember Zool? Remember slime? Remember Walmart? Remember Baskin Robbins? Remember when films were more original? I do. This really has the same stink that The Force Awakens had on it. Nostalgia really is the new drug.
Fair review. Like I said in my first thoughts video, I think the first 30-45 minutes is slow and it takes a while to get going - but that last third ... 😱 ... Not flawless, but damn near good enough for me!
The opening of the movie slammed you into your seat! Literally explaining all you need to know about the depth of the film. Me, I loved it. Saw GB2 in the theater as a kid. Loved this.
It's slow because it tediously builds up boring, shallow characters.
I described it as if it were ideal if there had not been a sequel since the original in 1984. Would have been ideal. As it stands this was a pleasant surprise and great addition to the story arc.
Equal parts Ghostbusters with a mix of Goonies (as noted towards the end of the review). Fun movie. I was smiling and laughing through the whole thing. The young girl, Phoebe, stole the show. Very adorkable. Same for Podcast. The two really played off each other.
R.I.P. Harold Ramis and Ivan Reitman
I'm curious about how Oliver feels about this sequel... I appreciated RLM's review...
The review is a bit too positive, think the nostalgia got to him
Honestly I need to see it for myself. It's very obvious what the movie is doing, it's playing HARD on nostalgia bait. However as much as I love RLM I still want to come to my own conclusions.
@@AvelierPlays
At least Oliver isn't toxically cynical.
@@fart895
I hate RLM. I get physically ill from that type of cynicism they have. I'm so glad I disowned them.
@@clea6717
That's just me.
I saw it and originally gave it a 8 - 8.5 out of 10 but after seeing Redletter Media's review I've lowered it to a 7 -7.5 out of 10. It's still worth seeing in the theater for its pure entertainment value but the script needed more work. It relies heavily on nostalgia and references to the previous movies and doesn't give us enough that's new and previously unseen or unexpected.
Still, it's a decent start to additional sequels should they be made and they probably will.
7:01 What's with the ancient looking B&W faded picture from the original movie? It's from 1984 not 1924! lol
In fariness, I have a Yearbook from 1995 that's all black and white. I mean it's not unheard of.
Very accurate review, Oliver!
It has its flaws but overall I loved it
Bustin' makes me feel good. But this...
I'm so torn with this film! Things I loved and things I cringed at, actually in the end the things I cringed at were things I was initially excited about going in.
I definitely didn't get emotional like so many people seemed to have. I'm not as extreme in view as RLM although closer to that camp
I really love Afterlife, I already lost count on the many times I re-watched the movie.
My biggest complaint is the marshmallow scene at the mall, the scene didn't fits with the rest of the movie and there is no reason to appear in that moment and there is no reason to that behavior other than fanservice, (and is a perfect example of bad fanservice) but I really enjoy the marshmallow sabotaging Trevor and Potcast gear in the Ecto-1 and how Potcast gets bathed in marshmallow in reference to the first Ghozer encounter in the original movie.
I really love this movie I was especially impressed at the fact that it remixed lesser music tracks from the original anc only played the main ghostbusters theme in the credits overall I think ghostbusters is finally in good hands
That ending made me cry.
PKE meter psycho-kinetic energy.
Again the editing in these videos is outstanding
Just got back from LA Comic Con and I can say Ghostbusters were definitely one of the most popular themes the whole weekend. Tons of classic merchandise and even a little for 2016 and although it was basically impossible to find any official merch from Afterlife a lot of the artist made stuff was also selling like hot cakes.
A decent attempt at a third movie, not perfect by any means though. My major criticism of the film was a little over reliance on nostalgia. I really wish they had chosen to explore a new villain, preferably picked from the Real Ghostbusters TV series (I personally would've loved to have seen Samhain, the demon god of Halloween).
A little ? That's an understatement. The whole film is nothing but nostalgia for the first film.
It really is a sequel to GB1, no mention of 2 ever appears. (With Ray's Occult being the exception.)
a "clumsy remake" is a good phrase for the 2016 ghostbusters. It's good for what it is, a kid's movie.
This reminded me a bit of Super 8 from JJ Abrahms
Sounds like the force awakens to me. I'd probably enjoy it, but for now I can't be arsed.
Loved this film. I laffed. and I cried. was drawn in by the characters and the pacing. The audience I screened the film with gave obvious signs that they were having a great time too.
I couldn’t disagree with you more. This film is the perfect example of how cinema and movies in general are sliding drastically.
The only thing the film does well is create nostalgia from the original movies. The script is lazy, the dialogue is clunky and the performances are so flat, with the only exception being Phoebe and podcast, who were the only saving grace - no pun intended. Even Paul Rudd, who I’m normally a fan of, is week in this.
It has none of the charm and wit of the original 2.
I actually can’t understand how people can hate on gb2 and like this!
lol I know this is probably a really meaningless nitpick but the Ghostbuster TV spot at 3:58 cracks me up. It looks in HD and I have yet to see a TV commercial from the 80s that wasn't played during the Super Bowl that actually looked good. They're usually a 25 generation copy off a SLP VHS tape that looked like it was eaten by a VCR and sound like you're hearing it in a fishbowl. Just think it would have added some authenticity to that part.
I really liked the opening scene, best part of the movie by far.
I tride, god i tride, but the kids theme to the movie and drama,lost me sorry im old and prefer the originals..not the stranger dangher rejects..good for newer gen but don't feel like GB to me
I will love Ghostbusters Afterlife because it’s a proper sequel to the original films
I love Afterlife, such a nice return to form for the Ghostbusters franchise and also a genuinely better sequel than GB2, in my opinion.
I like it, I would put this one 2nd place to the first one. I don't even want to acknowledge the 2016 reboot.
Jason Reitman said Ghostbusters 2 is still canon
Agreed. Not a perfect film, but a very enjoyable one none the less. Hears hopping for something fresh in the next one.
I don't understand why people are upset that this review is "too positive". Dude had a really good reaction to a movie. Fan service or not, some people liked it and some people hated it.
🐑
@@HunterMagunter
English please?
I really enjoyed this, both it and Ghostbusters 2 are very charming sequels even if they never really needed to happen, solid 7/10. Agree with you the biggest issue is the pacing of the third act.
Review starts at 3:36.
It felt like this movie was made out of love instead of hate, I can’t say the same for Ghostbusters 2016.
Wasn't perfect, but I still loved it
Not better than the original but better than the second ghostbusters and way better than the 2016 one
This is the way to make a trilogy!
Pretty sure when podcast says I believe in you, that was a goonies reference.
I could describe Ghostbusters Afterlife as a dream come true. It features the characters that we loved and cared about from the first two movies and it includes characters that we will love and care about just the same. By the end, I was shaking and had tears in my eyes.
jesus lol
Lol! Shaking!
Watched the movie last Thursday and i thoroughly enjoyed it. Agree with your review.
My companion is Ghostbusters acting life was amazing it had all the end elements for a great movie and scrolling up with Ghostbusters I was disappointing 2016 Ghostbusters it wasn't the acting it was the storyline that killed it The women Ghostbusters was great very funny actors but the storyline was stupid it could have been better with the same person who wrote Ghostbusters active life That's how I feel it made me laugh so hard I was crying having tears I was in my seat cheering a lot of people looking at me and clapping too I had the manager went up to me gave me a hug and said they're back I know yeah I know the manager from the movie theater couple other people was laughing at me cuz I was carrying they understand what I was saying but all in all I give it 10 out of 10 and 9 and 1/2 I wish it was longer it was funny with all the Easter eggs but I think is fair for this movie the acting was great I wish slimer was in this movie but all in all the great movie
Punctuation would help immensely.
Good review!! Saw this movie today and thought that it was good enough. Thought that the Phoebe & Podcast characters stole every scene they were in for they were way more interesting than the other characters. Literally fell asleep in a few spots for the movie did kind of drag on/get boring a bit, but I had driven cross-country for 14 hours the day before and was tired (at least that is the excuse I will use). Some plot-holes and other questions, but they did not detract from getting absorbed into the movie and enjoying it. May see again when not as tired as I was today.
Nostalgia Bukakke.
I've seen several reviews now by people who I respect their views (including Oliver) and they're quite polarised with some saying the call backs are overdone and in some cases are a real detriment to the film and the third act is mishandled. Others have liked it and the nostalgia but most fall somewhere in-between. I wonder where I'll fall, probably more towards the former as when I watched the trailers I became more and more sure it was heading to much in the way of relying on fan service and doing a soft reboot of the original.
Overalls 7/10 a good film with a healthy bit of respectful fan service 👍🏻 got me a bit emotional at the end with Egons ghost damnnnn
If looks like a kids film.
Because it is, which makes it even funnier that the 2nd half is nothing but callbacks to a 38 year old movie its honestly sad seeing how many people blindly like anything that was good when they were kids
@@HunterMagunter Ya, I mean I'm good then not to watch it. The great thing about the originals is that they really were a mix for all ages. Especially Bill Murray being the jaded scientist. Never being that excited when compared to Ray and Egon.
@@lancegoodthrust546 you nailed it on the head man
@@HunterMagunter Ya, I mean I'm 42 yrs old and I like to get nostalgic for this stuff once in a while. Then again I have a 35yr old coworker that has a stormtrooper tattoo on his elbow. Sometimes I feel like I'm the last adult on earth. I would of watched another GB sequel if I knew it was Venkman and Slimer going to get their driver license renewed. Oh well, hope the kids like this movie
The film has some great ideas but it's overstuffed with unnecessary additions which cause it to drag in places and have a runtime which is probably 20 minutes too long. Cut out Lucky, Trevor, the diner scenes, the scene in the rented apartment, Janine's cameo, the Aztec death whistle, Phoebe's jokes, the mini stay puft men and you have a better movie.
Too many callbacks? Well at least the call backs are from one of the greatest movies of all time.
Yes sir. Hoooooooo 🗡