Strangest Looking Most Highly Classified Aircraft Carrier Ever Built

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2025
  • It's 1965, and the Cold War verges on nuclear conflict. The Soviet Union has escalated tensions, threatening the West with annihilation.
    Patrolling the waters a few miles outside Washington DC, USS Wright comes to life as vessel and crew prepare for the unthinkable.
    Originally an aircraft carrier, this ship has been transformed. Its vast flight deck, once lined with fighter jets ready for combat, now hosts a forest of antennae and satellite dishes. These instruments of communication have replaced the roar of jet engines with the silent buzz of signals bouncing across the globe.
    A helicopter approaches, cutting through the sky with urgency. It lands smoothly on the deck, now cleared of any aircraft but fully equipped for its new role. Out steps President John F. Kennedy, immediately greeted by the ship's commanding officer. Together, they move briskly inside, descending into the bowels of the USS Wright.
    In the heart of the ship, a secure room houses a bank of color-coded telephones. Each one is a direct line to a different branch of the U.S. defense network, from the Pentagon to missile silos scattered across the country. This array of phones stands ready to orchestrate a unified response to any threat.
    Even deeper in the bowels of the emergency operations center, there is a reinforced room shrouded in secrecy, requiring a top-secret key code to enter.
    Before there were Doomsday planes, there were Doomsday Ships, created to ride out nuclear apocalypse. USS Wright was ready to do just that.

ความคิดเห็น • 265

  • @jamesbach2021
    @jamesbach2021 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +131

    The USS Wright looks like a HAM radio operators ultimate dream!

    • @UncleJoeLITE
      @UncleJoeLITE 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yeah, I might get one when/if I retire as a billionaire! Bugger that mega-yacht crap lol.

    • @Raymond-yq5ee
      @Raymond-yq5ee 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ❤​@@UncleJoeLITE

    • @IEatChickenAlmostDaily
      @IEatChickenAlmostDaily 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If it was a HAM dream more people would have known about it because they don't ever shut up about HAM.

    • @martythemartian99
      @martythemartian99 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Considering it is at sea, does that make it...(wait for it)... a wet dream? 🤣
      (Don't worry, I'll leave quietly)

    • @IEatChickenAlmostDaily
      @IEatChickenAlmostDaily 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@martythemartian99 and please make sure you trash the keyboard you wrote this on.

  • @JackForbes-sh4cc
    @JackForbes-sh4cc 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +82

    The only thing more amazing than the advanced technology and capabilities of this ship is how quickly it become obsolete as technology advanced.

    • @chrissinclair4442
      @chrissinclair4442 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Same with phone systems. People would by huge phone systems then and within 3 to 4 years the size would be halved and the price would go down. By the late seventies what would halve taken a room or two would be down to a pallet to 1/4 of a room.

    • @josephpowell736
      @josephpowell736 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Since there was a glaring mistake in the first 2 mins I could not finish it. Get your dates straight and presidents

  • @rogerbredemeier2220
    @rogerbredemeier2220 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +86

    I served on the Wright from Sept '65 to Sept '68. This video brought back many memories.

    • @tylercarlson1659
      @tylercarlson1659 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Any weird facts that you remember from the ship? Or any interesting missions that stick out to you? Thanks for your service

    • @rogerbredemeier2220
      @rogerbredemeier2220 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @tylercarlson1659 When the remote controlled chopper flew

    • @limehawk4989
      @limehawk4989 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @rogerbredemeier2220 do you remember JFK being on the ship in 1965 like he claims? haha

    • @rogerbredemeier2220
      @rogerbredemeier2220 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If I remember correctly JFK was killed 62 or 63.

  • @chheinrich8486
    @chheinrich8486 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Never has this channel sold us such bonkers situations as JFK being on a ship in 1965😂😂

  • @kevinpresley3136
    @kevinpresley3136 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +334

    John F. Kennedy was not president in 1965 having been assinated in November 1963 in Dallas.

    • @MrPimpmygun
      @MrPimpmygun 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      Lmfao god damn ai videos 😂

    • @OldManAndTheSeaOfTooManyCats
      @OldManAndTheSeaOfTooManyCats 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      What? Why didn’t someone tell us about this?

    • @christophermontoya6178
      @christophermontoya6178 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +89

      Historically the ship is real , The helicopter was real , The video footage is real , The date that JFK visited the ship however is incorrect.
      JFK’s visit to the ship was 4 months prior to his assassination , you can look this up in the National archives…

    • @xxxlonewolf49
      @xxxlonewolf49 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      His zombie came back for a tour.

    • @jeffbrinkerhoff5121
      @jeffbrinkerhoff5121 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      ​@@christophermontoya6178guess that explains why he didn't look so good...

  • @UncleJoeLITE
    @UncleJoeLITE 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Fascinating, a shame we don't have more pictures, thanks.
    _The 'Kennedy being dead in 1965' error I'm sure 1,000 USAers have pointed out lol._

  • @neildollar
    @neildollar 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +158

    Great video, but I’d bet the farm JFK didn’t ride in a single helicopter in 1965.

    • @lyfandeth
      @lyfandeth 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Ooops, looks like someone breached the classified story of what happened in Dallas.

    • @navyreviewer
      @navyreviewer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      That's what "they" want you to think. 😂 I've still never gotten a clear answer on who "they" are, but I've been assured "they" sit in dark smoke filled rooms.

    • @jBKht931
      @jBKht931 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @dougaldouglas8842 or is it? 🤔

    • @billwebb9643
      @billwebb9643 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Was Marilyn Monroe there?

    • @I_Have_The_Most_Japanese_Music
      @I_Have_The_Most_Japanese_Music 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because he already bought it?

  • @beerdrinker6452
    @beerdrinker6452 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    A great prototype for the USS Blue Ridge (LCC-19). Commissioned in about 1973. She is still in service. The USN's third longest serving ship.

    • @El_drewskii
      @El_drewskii 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Ah yes, 7th fleet’s party barge.

  • @jakelandry5645
    @jakelandry5645 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I worked on the RC-135v/w exclusively, but did work on the OC-135, WC-135, and on a few occasions the RC-135s and u. Neat aircraft. The Navy "TACAMO" and USAF E4b were also at Offutt. All very cool planes that play a large part in the nuclear triad and Intel.

    • @biggiefitz6275
      @biggiefitz6275 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The Cobra Ball would sometimes open or close garage doors in our old neighborhood just west off post of Offutt. Made sure not to park under an open door. lol

  • @martyober4833
    @martyober4833 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Saw her sitting in the Philadelphia Navy Yard
    Thought she had been used in the space program
    Great explanation of her function

  • @peterhennes1610
    @peterhennes1610 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Was stationed on her from Sept 1966 to june 1967. Quite a ship. Made Shellback going to Johnsons meeting. Week liberty in Rio Not too bad either.

  • @KroMagnum4
    @KroMagnum4 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Never heard of this one.
    Wow.

  • @AZREDFERN
    @AZREDFERN 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    This is literally every amateur radio operators, wet dream

    • @53ph3ra
      @53ph3ra 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "Wet dream"? I see what you did there!

  • @jBKht931
    @jBKht931 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    You left out USS Triton with her 2 reactors and massive secure space and antennas for command and control.
    Originally conceived to go up the Potomac to pickup the President. However nobody bothered checking how deep the water was. Too shallow. Opps 😂

    • @stewiegriffin88
      @stewiegriffin88 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      😂😂😂 What I would give to see the project coordinators' face when they found out that little detail lmao

    • @JosephAllen-kx4xl
      @JosephAllen-kx4xl 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Loose lips etc...lol
      Hey,we sent a satellite into space built with metric and saw measurements.

    • @olehcelsior1005
      @olehcelsior1005 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What an interesting insight. And that thing being the most advanced, complex and expensive piece of submarine ended up serving just 10 years.
      Waited for 40 years for tilisation

    • @jBKht931
      @jBKht931 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@olehcelsior1005 I was fascinated by her and read what little there was about her. I was visiting my cousin one Christmas around 2005 and her husband's dad served on her. Really great stories, especially the engine room.

  • @kennedymcgovern5413
    @kennedymcgovern5413 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    When I was in, we had the "Mount Whitney." She sat on Pier 25 in Norfolk and never really moved. Her hull number was 20, so we all called her "Building 20."

    • @lancerevell5979
      @lancerevell5979 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      What years? I was an ET on the ASW Frigate USS Ainsworth FF-1090, homeported at Norfolk, Va. in the early 1980s. 😊

    • @JosephAllen-kx4xl
      @JosephAllen-kx4xl 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's funny

    • @kennedymcgovern5413
      @kennedymcgovern5413 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@lancerevell5979 a little after you. In from 88-92. Norfolk from 89-92. GSE aboard USS Hayler (DD997). She was the last of the Spru Cans

  • @matthewnewton8812
    @matthewnewton8812 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    “Fastest around-the-worpld signal” is a nonsense phrase.
    Radio waves are part of the electromagnetic spectrum. I.e. they are a lower frequency version of visible light. The same exact thing.
    And light moves at a particular speed (300.000km/second or 186,000miles/second). Having larger and more powerful antennas DOES NOT speed up the radio waves lmao.
    The only thing that can alter the speed of light is if it is forced to move through a medium other than empty space. And in that case, it alters the speed DOWNWARD, not upward.
    The time it takes for a signal to travel around the world is the circumference of the earth divided by the speed of light. (If indeed it’s traveling the circumference exactly; it’s more likely that the signal is bouncing off of clouds etc.).

    • @abcde_fz
      @abcde_fz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Maybe the record includes the time needed for the 'plain text' message to be both encoded for transmission, and decoded and printed or displayed as 'plain text' again. So rather than simply measuring the time it takes to for a discrete EMF signal to go from transmitter to receiver, (which is just light speed thing you mention), they measure the total time it takes to go from human readable on one end to human readable on the other. Totally just a guess on my part. Who knows what's meant when a casual description leaves out the total details of why they considered it a record??? 🙂

  • @olderandslower3265
    @olderandslower3265 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I don"t think 1965 is correct here.

  • @vanpenguin22
    @vanpenguin22 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Those NECP 747's i remember seeing parked at Boeing Field in the 70's shortly after roll-out.

  • @xxxlonewolf49
    @xxxlonewolf49 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The power needed to power & cool those electronics...

  • @martythemartian99
    @martythemartian99 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So we went from Floating White House to Flying White House. Does that mean the next version will be an Orbital White House? 🤔

  • @rokadaprliinnysystemyaczno4761
    @rokadaprliinnysystemyaczno4761 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good Dark Seas doc 👍

  • @ROBERTGOTSCHALL-j8u
    @ROBERTGOTSCHALL-j8u 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    At the Commsta I was at we had 3 FRT 62 transmitters. Each could put out two hundred thousand watts rms. I’ve always wondered if they could ever put one of those thing aboard ship.

  • @georgeking3218
    @georgeking3218 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I worked at the Long Beach Naval Shipyard in the 60's & 70's, when the USS Arlington agmr2 was docked at the Mole. It was the same type of converted Carrier as the USS Wright. How come you didn't mention it in your presentation?

    • @samescobar1065
      @samescobar1065 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank you, I just asked the same question, since I served 15 months on the USS Arlington agmr2 Damage, in the Tonkin gulf.

    • @ericboynton9937
      @ericboynton9937 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because it came second? Or maybe because it was west coast further from Washington?

    • @dnagle2159
      @dnagle2159 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do any of you have more information about the USS Arlington? My Grandpa served during Vietnam and was sent to assist during the capture of the USS Pueblo. He was a Deckhand. Eventually he was a gunner on a river boat for a year. Didn’t talk about that much, but enjoyed his time on the Arlington. Thank you

  • @samescobar1065
    @samescobar1065 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Hey, What about the USS Annapolis agmr1 and the USS Arlington agmr2 ? They were the same type and looked alike they both served off the coast of Vietnam in the middle 60s. I served 15 months on the USS Arlington agmr2 Damage Control 3ed Class

    • @davidperry5024
      @davidperry5024 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      they were from 2 different classes of ship. USS Annapolis agmr1 was from an escort carrier(cve) & USS Arlington agmr2 was from a light carrier(cvl).

    • @samescobar1065
      @samescobar1065 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@davidperry5024 thanks, these two ship's were major communication ships and not the white house type as the USS Wright.And am sure we spyed quite a bit while in the Tonkin gulf.

    • @TeamDoc312
      @TeamDoc312 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yea, only only two Saipan Class, the Saipan and Wright. Saipan was made into a Communications Relay ship, and re-commissioned as the Arlington. While the Wright was converted into a Command ship. If I remember right, their hulls were not keel up carriers, but, constructed from heavy cruiser hulls.

  • @wramsey2656
    @wramsey2656 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As an EE and Ham i can appreciate this video. Never knew about this CV, excellent video.

  • @RobertMattison-pp6uf
    @RobertMattison-pp6uf 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I really enjoyed this posted episode. Thank you for sharing.

  • @EspionageTV
    @EspionageTV 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I love the Dark

  • @jyralnadreth4442
    @jyralnadreth4442 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Isn't USS Wright sister ship of USS Saipan? Yup...Saipan class Light Carriers

    • @samescobar1065
      @samescobar1065 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      USS Saipan was later converted into the USS Arlington agmr2 which looked like the USS Wright, I served 15 months on the USS Arlington agmr2 Damage Control 3ed class in 1968 69 Westpac want everywhere in the Orient from Japan to Sydney and everywhere in between lots of good times in ports

  • @DivadNoodeldehm-lz2gm
    @DivadNoodeldehm-lz2gm 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thought the thumbnail was clickbait. It wasn't. Cool!

  • @DesperateDigger666
    @DesperateDigger666 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    "It's 1965"...and JFK visits a naval facility off the East Coast. What do you know that we don't? Could his funeral in November 1963 be a false memory? May I finally put that trauma behind me?

    • @I_Have_The_Most_Japanese_Music
      @I_Have_The_Most_Japanese_Music 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Presidents in rearview mirror may be more alive than they appear."

    • @davidgrover5996
      @davidgrover5996 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We don’t like to talk about it but Biden wasn’t the first zombie POTUS.

  • @brianmorisset4489
    @brianmorisset4489 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My FiL served on the USS North Hampton in the late 50's

  • @benjaminlewis671
    @benjaminlewis671 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A man could do a lot of stuff with an old aircraft carrier and an unlimited budget.

  • @elsonplanilla1755
    @elsonplanilla1755 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Communication from land,air and sea including military facilities and headquarters from your country put on one place away from danger is a well coordinated tactics and very dangerous strategy, i really like this video,i watch it over and over.

  • @carlgreisheimer8701
    @carlgreisheimer8701 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Was there a stateroom for Marolin Monroe?

    • @pike100
      @pike100 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      *Marilyn

    • @carlgreisheimer8701
      @carlgreisheimer8701 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @pike100 I can't spell to save my life. Thanks for the correction thou.

  • @drmarkintexas-400
    @drmarkintexas-400 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    🤗🤗💙💪🙏
    Thank you for sharing this

  • @robertjones1729
    @robertjones1729 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for my continusing education..gret stuff I didn't know

  • @MichaelCampin
    @MichaelCampin 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think I still have a Revell kit of a Russian Trawler aka a Spyship with all its masts. Not exactly undercover.

  • @jeepdude7359
    @jeepdude7359 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    When a president boards a naval ship, is its new call sign “Ship Force One”? 😆

  • @Yuki_Ika7
    @Yuki_Ika7 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Hello Dark(ness) my old friend!

  • @bilbulkley5145
    @bilbulkley5145 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My grandfather fought in Guam he was shot 3 times and stabbed 3 times,his hole platoon was one of the first ones on the beachs, he killed 17 before he realized he only had lost all but 12 which they all ended up dying and my grandfather hid under two of his friends who he had gone through basic with, the Japanese went through the body's and stabbed and shot all body's on the field and my gran dad what stabbed and shot,then layed there tell the reinforcements a day later still the most decorated person from Utah

  • @scottknox3881
    @scottknox3881 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I doubt the USS Wright as a light aircraft carrier ever landed jet aircraft as mentioned as I doubt the flight deck was rated for the harder jet landings, but I could be wrong.

  • @76629online
    @76629online 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I used to know that access code.

  • @CmdCodd
    @CmdCodd 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah could you imagine the president going to a nearby facility in suddenly launching into space in a SpaceX starship?
    We would be like oh s*** really!? 😂

  • @mechanicman8687
    @mechanicman8687 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is why I like Dark Seas

  • @thomaslinton5765
    @thomaslinton5765 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "It's 1965" and JFK lands on a carrier? Have you no pride in your dubious work?

  • @auro1986
    @auro1986 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    did all that antenna work during sea storms and rain?

    • @pike100
      @pike100 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes

  • @docholidayoutlaws104
    @docholidayoutlaws104 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Had no idea of such a Air Taft carrier ; good video !!!!!

  • @CrackedCandy
    @CrackedCandy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    On 9/11, the doomsday plane was used in earnest for the first time. AF1 was seen in Nebraska

  • @robertphillips6296
    @robertphillips6296 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    USS Pueblo was crewed by scientists?

    • @pike100
      @pike100 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A small number of actual scientists. Most of the crew were Navy, CIA, NSA, etc.

  • @davidcarper7449
    @davidcarper7449 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What jets ever operated on this ship?

  • @JFrazer4303
    @JFrazer4303 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Planes still have only a limited time aloft, even with refueling, and their runways are fixed.
    A ship with proper escorts is practically invulnerable, with anti-satellite weapons in every escort, subs that can hear everything waterborne for hundreds of miles.

  • @charsbob
    @charsbob 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Your intro places the timeline at 1965. I'm sure you know that JFK was assassinated in 1963. The rest of the time hacks seem right.

  • @daleshelden8394
    @daleshelden8394 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The command post in Pennsylvania is called Raven Rock!

  • @RevdGeraldJones
    @RevdGeraldJones 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It is sooo reassuring that when war comes due to the slime we call leaders, that these ships would have kept the very said slime alive!

  • @TruthyToo
    @TruthyToo 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I used to hate this guys voice but at least I know he's not AI.

  • @altonwilliams17
    @altonwilliams17 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    0:48 The retrofit started March 1962 to May 1963. The time JFK landed on the USS Wright had to occur between May 1963 and September 3rd 1963. Death of JFK happened November 22nd 1963.
    I dont believe the narrator meant to imply that JFK was alive in 1965, ONLY trying to set the stage or buildup of the story, which is confirmed at time-markers 4:38, 6:27, and 8:59.
    At 8:59, he mentioned that (after he mentioned both JFK and LBJ), that "the latter" (referring to LBJ NOT "the former" JFK) wrote a letter about the ship in 1966.
    He just needs a new script writer or editor.

  • @Nomad416
    @Nomad416 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The 747's no longer in production, so I doubt an E-4 replacement will be based on it.

  • @mattclark6246
    @mattclark6246 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The cold war never ended it just changed over the years
    We're always at war with Russia no matter what happens when where & how & why
    We always must be the alpha nation with the greatest advanced technology
    From the baby boomers to the millennials
    This is how we always stay ahead of the Russian bear
    🕊️ Of peace

    • @julmdamaslefttoe3559
      @julmdamaslefttoe3559 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      monkey brain go brrr more like.

    • @AussieSurvivalAndPreparedness
      @AussieSurvivalAndPreparedness 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah because technology did real well against sub par enemies in Vietnam and Afghanistan arguably Iraq as well.

    • @JosephAllen-kx4xl
      @JosephAllen-kx4xl 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russia is a third world country.
      No one cares about communists. LOL
      They are like the but hurt neighbors that try to steal the garden hose.
      Nobody cares

    • @olehcelsior1005
      @olehcelsior1005 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You have much more trouble with Chinese 🐼 now and years to come

  • @allandavis8201
    @allandavis8201 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The largest command and communication system ever put into service at sea…………..yup 100% agreed, however, it was probably the most identifiable target for the potential enemies to attack before launching a preemptive strike against the USA 🇺🇸 or the world, I wouldn’t have given it much of a chance, even with a carrier strike group type of defensive screen.
    All power to the USA for coming up with this idea and making it a reality, and I don’t think any other nation would have been able or willing to spend the kind of money that it must have taken to make it a reality.

  • @icreatedanaccountforthis1852
    @icreatedanaccountforthis1852 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wild

  • @bilbulkley5145
    @bilbulkley5145 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would love to see both of there stores my grand day was army and his brother who invented the pt boat

    • @bilbulkley5145
      @bilbulkley5145 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Army and navy **

  • @GorillaGwenny
    @GorillaGwenny 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A aircraft carrier with bunny ears…could only get 5 channels I bet

    • @martykarr7058
      @martykarr7058 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well, considering that the few satellites that were in orbit were either Soviet ones looking at us or ours looking at them.

  • @speedbirdoneone
    @speedbirdoneone 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My uncle, a US Air Force Colonel served on both the USS Wright and USS Northampton.

  • @JohnCunningham-sy5ug
    @JohnCunningham-sy5ug 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I wonder how much the cable bill was. And if they had to subscribe to peacock for Thursday night feetball.😅

    • @pike100
      @pike100 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thursday Night Football is on Amazon Prime, not Peacock.

  • @kennedymcgovern5413
    @kennedymcgovern5413 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is the ship ONI officer Bob Woodward came from.

  • @davidhudson5452
    @davidhudson5452 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Maybe JFK was still alive

  • @ImpendingJoker
    @ImpendingJoker 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Logistical Implementation of Ground and Marine Assests(LIGMA)

  • @richiewilson6825
    @richiewilson6825 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Or was he assassinated in 63 LOL

  • @bilbulkley5145
    @bilbulkley5145 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My last name is Bulkley look us up navy juggernaut he invented the pt boat

  • @NOLAfugee
    @NOLAfugee 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I guess the submarine is still classified

  • @denalisurvivalschool7284
    @denalisurvivalschool7284 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    That was my dad's last ship he served on after WW2.

  • @paxwallace8324
    @paxwallace8324 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah they got the dates of the Cuban Missile Crisis wrong🦧

  • @rastamann2009
    @rastamann2009 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That voice modulation does the opposite of what you think, dude

  • @buckaroobanzai8480
    @buckaroobanzai8480 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    UFO the next one.

  • @foglebr
    @foglebr 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wait, yo Dark Seas. Is this an AI channel? How much do you actually do yourself? I had thought this was just a faceless channel with a human voiced script. If this is all AI then I’m impressed but also disappointed.

  • @jamesragus1577
    @jamesragus1577 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Complimentary algorithm enhancement comment!😊

  • @dennisdriscoll7830
    @dennisdriscoll7830 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seems like it would be an easy target in a nuclear war!

    • @pike100
      @pike100 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In 1963, the Wright would not have been an easy target. At that time, nuclear weapons were not that accurate.

  • @abc-coleaks-info
    @abc-coleaks-info 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The ship is “a few miles from Washington DC” bet is was further away than that! Unless the moved DC to the coast, there are some states in the way.

    • @n20prostock97
      @n20prostock97 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You reckon it could have been in the Potomac river or something like that?

    • @pike100
      @pike100 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Washington DC is pretty much on the coast.

    • @abc-coleaks-info
      @abc-coleaks-info 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pike100 Tidle arms of the Delaware and Potomac River are bordered by DC, the state of Maryland is to its north and east. 113 miles to the east from DC is Ocean City, Maryland on the coast.
      You’re right, pretty much on the coast, by air. The video references an ocean going ship though.

  • @crackerlackingproductions6746
    @crackerlackingproductions6746 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's probably best they aren't in use now. Joe would stumble out a wrong door and tumble overboard.

  • @mikebarbeau8569
    @mikebarbeau8569 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Crewed by scientists off N. Korea... Ok...

  • @isellcatlitter
    @isellcatlitter 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    BOING??? (Formerly known as BOEING), why would you trust DEI (Didn't Earn It) to them????

  • @iamrichrocker
    @iamrichrocker 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    how could the mega channel(s) eff up a date and JFK..

  • @DIREWOLFx75
    @DIREWOLFx75 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    "The Soviet Union has escalated tensions"
    Uh, no?
    The west escalated tensions by putting nuclear weapons in Turkey, to which USSR RESPONDED by what then caused the Cuba crisis, because oh dear, the very idea of USSR doing THE SAME THING was utterly unthinkable!

    • @julmdamaslefttoe3559
      @julmdamaslefttoe3559 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is what it is, a agenda nearly spanning a 100 years.

    • @DIREWOLFx75
      @DIREWOLFx75 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @dougaldouglas8842 That's what i thought when i was a kid.
      Then i started seeing some very disturbing patterns more and more blatantly apparent.
      USA and USSR did the exact same thing, USA got applause while USSR got hate.
      Then i happened to read a report comparing "provocative behaviour" from both sides.
      And realised that over 95% of it came from USA. When USSR did something like it, it was always for a specific reason.
      While USA had it set as STANDARD behaviour.
      This becomes horribly obvious if you start looking at submarine behaviour, and just how many collisions USA submarines caused during the cold war, because they were being carelessly aggressive or arrogantly provocative.
      Simple conclusion, if USSR had behaved even HALF as provocative as USA during the cold war, then WWIII would already be history.
      US commanders nearly always ASSUMED that they had the INHERENT RIGHT to act as complete maverick dikheads.
      They assumed that Soviet military did NOT have ANY rights at all to defend their nation, they were just supposed to meekly sit back and get killed or run away at the drop of a hat.
      This is also part of why today is as it is, the above behaviour didn't go away with the cold war, instead it got MUCH WORSE.

    • @JosephAllen-kx4xl
      @JosephAllen-kx4xl 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russia blows. You know exactly what I mean.lol😅😅😢
      Russia, Chinese, same difference.
      Steal steal steal

    • @JosephAllen-kx4xl
      @JosephAllen-kx4xl 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Who's country collapsed?

    • @DIREWOLFx75
      @DIREWOLFx75 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JosephAllen-kx4xl Neither.
      But USA is looking like a very good candidate for it within the next decade or two.
      The USSR did not collapse. It dissolved itself BY CHOICE.
      And if they had known just what level of bad faith the west operated under, and just what level of blind hatred and racism against Russia there was, they would probably never have done it.

  • @billryland6199
    @billryland6199 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That ship was just an easy target. It would take a lot of ships to keep submarines and bombers far enough away.

    • @lancerevell5979
      @lancerevell5979 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It wouldn't operate alone, but with many support ships, to provide AAA and ASW protection.

    • @chriswho12345
      @chriswho12345 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Submarines were less of an issue before blue water navy nuclear submarines common etc. and these ships were decommissioned when these threats did evolve enough. Bombers are too far for an unknown carrier target before satellites were more common

  • @patricklemire9278
    @patricklemire9278 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah seems like a big dinner bell for enemy subs

  • @chriszelez7970
    @chriszelez7970 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is an old CVE from WWII

  • @arthurschipper8906
    @arthurschipper8906 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How long would it take to cook a pound of bacon left out on the deck with all those micro waves?

  • @brownwrench
    @brownwrench 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Needs more bowels

  • @JamesPhieffer
    @JamesPhieffer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I expect the new nuclear powered carriers that began entering service in the late 60s and 70s (Enterprise and the Nimitz-class) were able to utilize newer technology and their massive size to provide all the space and communications facilities to more than replace Wright and Southampton.
    Not to mention that provided by the new amphibious assault ships, with their need for both space for operations staff, and command and control.

  • @bilbulkley5145
    @bilbulkley5145 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have some of his things from war including Japanese swords guns head bands bayonets ect for proof let me know dark😊

  • @suzannakoizumi8605
    @suzannakoizumi8605 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That was when we had our wonderful President Kennedy. Not now. MAGA.

    • @ayoonemo
      @ayoonemo 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When was America ever great? 1776 and we were in slavery, after slavery was Jim Crow, after Jim Crow the kkk was still running around, the CIA was planting drugs into black communities, when was America ever truly great? Not just for whites, for all!

  • @ralphe5842
    @ralphe5842 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Our boy scout troop toured this ship at about the time you are talking about so not that secret

    • @pike100
      @pike100 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think you are probably mistaken about which ship you toured (or when you took the tour).

  • @pieterveenders9793
    @pieterveenders9793 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sounds like a pretty risky idea, attempting to keep your country's leader safe on a ship out at sea during a (nuclear) world war. After all it's a sitting duck for submarines and long range missiles. Massive deep underground bunkers make for much better hideouts, you can store years worth of food, water and fuel in them if they're properly built and stocked, a ship on the other hand won't be able to sustain in the basic needs for more than a couple of months.

  • @robertbelardo7087
    @robertbelardo7087 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Edit your video, Kennedy was not president in 1965,
    Downvoted
    Everyone should downvote until you fix it.

  • @lynnwood7205
    @lynnwood7205 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The new technology. a completely stealth anti granitic drive hyper hyper sonic craft.

  • @stefaneer9120
    @stefaneer9120 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    John F. Kennedy live in 1965? It smells like a really good conspiracy theory.
    ☺️😏🤫

  • @lightningmcqueen181
    @lightningmcqueen181 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    OMG,Look how old that Carrier is! That thing predates the Roman Empire!
    That thing wasn't converted, IT was Resurrected!

  • @brucegreen4359
    @brucegreen4359 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I hope they had all the Fcc licenses

    • @persistentwind
      @persistentwind 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Interesting fact... the us military doesn't fall under the fcc for spectrum usage.

  • @pvccannon1966
    @pvccannon1966 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If i was the Pres. Get me to a f-14. Then to the Ford air craft carrier. Long time there with great food and defence.

    • @pike100
      @pike100 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The F-14s have all been retired (and destroyed) a long time ago.

  • @phred196
    @phred196 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Details matter. Facts matter. Particularly in history. Having a smooth voice over is worthless if you're going to sell us garbage. Clearly no one proof read your copy.
    If you can't be bothered to check your facts then I can't be bothered to watch whatever crap you see fit to deliver.
    For 3 weeks you've known about the error and haven't even bothered to do anything about it. I am unsubscribing. Have a nice life.