Amazing how we have gotten to a point that unfinished games are fully released so commonly that the game breaking bugs are now called "teething issues" and are considered normal...
well thats how games have been for the past 7/8years, i suppose the plus side is that they can patch them, i know i know, games shiouldnt be shit when they come out, but if you look at games on the 6th gen consoels, if they werre fuck, they were fucked, you had to wait for a new disc to be publishjed and purchase it again, if you wanted the glitches fixed
You clearly didn't grow up playing video games or are to young to know, it's always been like this, except pre-internet there was no patches ...it was just fuckd up permanently
I can tell you right away, in this game more FOV means better FPS (but only by a tiny bit. maybe 2-3 fps). Same for Sharpening. Sharpening is only a filter and costs maybe 1 or 2 fps
@@fwabble all good. You know DF. They’ll title their video on one thing and cover like 2 billion things in the video 🙄so I don’t blame you for not knowing LOL
@@molsen7549 it doesn't really add noticeable latency and they can pair it with more aggressive dynamic resolution scaling, which would improve latency as you'd get more frames. If either FSR or DLSS improves performance it also improves latency.
@@BDreGaming if I had to guess I’d think DF doesn’t pay that much and Tom probably decided to do it part time as a passion project. Just like Audi got another job but still does DF
Great video, I had been waiting to see testing like this. I am on PS5 but genuinely impressed by the Series S. I have to admit, I am disappointed there was no testing done on a wider FOV between 110-120. Console players had been asking for FOV slider for years so that was a huge selling point with this game. Playing on 80 FOV seem outdated and more of an old console setting. Next gen users most likely won't be playing at 80 FOV.
Really love these analysis videos. I can tell an awful amount of work must go into putting them together. Looking forward to the next one to see how the previous gen consoles do. Keep up the great work guys !
I wish there was a setting for how much motion blur is applied; sometimes it looks right, sometimes it looks like too much. Not complaining though, this is the best looking CoD so far, _in my opinion_
What still amazes me is the amount of pop-in on the newer consoles. Especillay since that was one of the selling-points of Sony for the PS5 and the SSD communication.
@@mr.blonde7812 yes there is, pop in happens in all games no matter how much you spend. LOD is LOD and LODs are gonna LOD. Nanite seems tk be coming to the rescue. Besides, pretty much every COD streamer on PC has way worse graphics settings than even series S, aliased, unstable images with 300 FPS
Im so impressed. I have played this on a strong pc with rtx 3080 and 12700k and on ps5….i had a MUCH (!) smoother and more enjoyable experience on Playstation…thats crazy! You could argue that the pc-version is just poorly optimized, but the pc should run circles around the consoles…but the freezes, stutters and framedrops (70-160fps) mame the pc such a inconsistent experience, that i currently much prefer the PS5version…crazy.
@@Brisingr73it’s an optimization issue. IW optimized the console versions which run perfect on PS5/XSX. While the PC version is being optimized by a different studio called beenox.
@@ppsonOK. They done a test for the old gen this week. Guess what? :) it remains the same most of the time. The main problem with the old generation of consoles is that they struggle at any FOV
@@winrargameplays I saw that video, and it did affect the FPS even if it wasn't too much. But, they forgot to compare the resolution. If you have to sacrifice detail for FPS then you might opt for a lower FOV. I have the Series X and LG C2. I don't notice a significant drop in FPS with higher FOV, but haven't done a lot of testing. I run 90 FOV, not for FPS but I found it feels right. Lately I've been reverting to running Warzone in 60 FPS since you get so much more detail and draw distance. You can see people across the map.
Given the success of Warzone and IW's push into truly massive maps, I'd love to see COD's campaign mode expand to include Metro Exodus style sandbox levels. I feel like that's a great midpoint between COD's classic heavily scripted, linear singleplayer experience with the freedom of Warzone's open environment.
@@Oceanandskylinevidss I’ve seen the A80J it’s no a huge difference to be honest you aren’t missing out at all it just dissipates image Retention bit better they’re awesome TVs
Yea I need that. This game looks and runs great on ps5 but on my pc I can’t get it to hit a nice 60 without seriously turn down settings which isn’t normal
@@NothingHereForYou From what I've heard it's a CPU bottleneck, I'm getting a solid 110 fps maxed out without DLSS or 140ish with DLSS but still get stutters with a very heavily overclocked 12700k.
That ain’t motion blur, that trail is a LOT larger than the weapon moves in a single frame, motion blur is always smaller and, you know, actually looks like blur, not like multiple copies of the gun.
De always want to project ps5 superiority, that is made on purpose, xbox mops the floor by a huge margin in 120 mode and did not make ghosting, somebody explain that and I will not repeat that.
@@acevedoaandres I think they are fair with respect to console competition but this is another instance of ghosting gone unaddressed. It's a major distraction that should be scrutinized on all platforms.
I tried it last night and it is massively better. I have an rtx 3070 and was playing it in 4k with dlss @ 100fps. The open beta had me running the game in 1440p @ 45-55fps.
One thing that i find strange is when we have the 3 way comparison you can see ghosting in the Series X I S footage but it is absent in the PS5 footage. You can see this ghosting at the 9:48 mark in the XBX footage if you look at the scope while it is paning over the water surface but it is absent in the PS5 side. You can see it even more clearly at the at the 15:39 mark if you watch the scope of the weapon , again , you see heavy ghosting.Why is that?
Hardware advantages which is part of Sonys deal with Activision, it’s pretty much confirmed considering that Sony demanded that Microsoft do not do any hardware advantages on Xbox if they are going to let them acquire Activision
@@zackariasevertson7733 I see you are unaware of the legal troubles that would cause, because if that were true we would be hearing about MS sueing ABK instead of trying to buy them.
@@zackariasevertson7733 Why would ghosting have anything to do with a Sony Activision deal and how would ghosting have anything to do with any hardware advantage at all? Either it's a bug , a DF capture difference or both at the same time. Either way definitely not because of a deal between 2 companys.
Why are u suprised the specs on the consoles arent tht far apart mfkas been telling u stop letting xbox use the teraflop numbers to think its extremely more powerful not the case
I don't think Alex likes doing online shooter analysis due to them being difficult to capture. Battlefield 2042 was another that was skipped in that regard, no optimised settings that time either.
@@_Quint_ I‘m not talking about CPU performance. Graphics settling only affect the GPU for the most part, whether that‘s done in the campaign, multiplayer or Warzone doesn’t really matter
I would love to see a PC analysis of this game! I would love to see if you guys have found a way to mitigate the crashing. It sucks when you are more afraid of the game crashing than getting killed by an enemy.
@@weeaboojones2451 Do you have a link? I have driver version 526.98 installed. If you look in Steam forums, its something happening to everyone. I haven't seen any definitive fix, just a lot of theories.
Performance tanked when warzone 2.0 came out. I had much better FPS in multiplayer before the patch. 204 FPS on 4090 before and 184 after on AVG in mw2 benchmark. Some people say it's due to low shaders being thrown into medium shaders option or something like that.
So why did the ps5 out performed XSX in ASSASSINS CREED VALHALLA? xbox had marketing right and exclusive content for the game as well🤔..... Including the: *"XBOX SERIES X OPTIMIZED"* 😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👍
But it had marketing rights, so why didn't the XSX out performed ps5? Hey that's your argument, not mine.🤷🏻♂️ Back in the it was the tools, two years later is what? "marketing deal" lol Keep crying!😏👌
They used to and then they stopped. I guess that's a Patreon exclusive as well. I hate that they hold back content for money which is weird because they are a part of and funded by Eurogamer.
@@ConnorH2111 you do know that most don’t even have a high end 4K TV right? Why must you be so ignorant of that fact and treat those that are not affluent as lesser human beings? I’m glad that there is a lesser price option for those that have limited budgets. I’m grateful for being able to afford all the platforms and devices. Don’t forget how lucky you are.
I always assumed that the lack of image stability would be a hinderance in a game focused around spotting movement, but no… apparently jaggy, shimmering visuals are preferred
*watches video, sees consoles hit 1080p to keep 60 fps. *Finds comment from clear console putz stating that it looks bad on PC’s with higher settings and frame rates *laughs hysterically
@@xBINARYGODxDigital foundry are experts of worldwide recognition. The latter channels mainly share videos so that their favorite platform wins. It's literally blatant. Digital foundry is not just an ordinary channel that compares the framerate test. They got XSX as one of the first to know the test because they are respected. Digital foundry breaks down the game exactly as it is, not like the other channels when it is clearly visible that it is it's completely different
@@Zander0777 I have 144hz monitor but it isn't an Oled. Doesn't even compare in terms of colors coming off the screen. I have a desk about 7 feet back from the TV and I can play on it comfortably with mouse and keyboard on my ps5 👌
Correction: playing it on a Qled 55inch vrr 120fps is not only a cheat code but a dream with PS5. The advantages I have and with the haptic triggers turned on! Your losing if it is off because I can rest my fingers HEAVY on the trigger so when something is in my cross hairs there is zero input lag and I always get the first shot off like a quick draw at sundown. Try doing that without haptic and your likely to fire without meaning too whilst I'm am already halfway down on the trigger giving me the edge to get to full shot first. By a hair.
Oled is great for colors but vrr is not very good. That input delay is nasty. Consoles can't even use reflex so that's a bummer. Glad I can kill more people that use 55" vrr tv's with 10-15ms input delay. Hope you all realize this is why pc players buy high refresh displays. So they don't have to use vrr and get tons of input delay.
@@heyy-yaa If you cared about power you wouldn't get the Series S. The performance and looks are good if not great for a budget machine. You're simply not the target audience.
@@CallumSk8er If you weren't aware some games are affected by the consoles resolution settings it's just not many devs leave it to the system and choose to have a straight forward approach.
12 Tflops never mattered, the GPU ram is split into 2 pools, only 10 of the gigs of ram are at the higher bandwidth, and some of that is allocated for other functions on the system, the system was doomed to always have bottlenecks. Another thing no one ever talks about anymore, is how washed out colors seem to look on Series X, whereas the colors are fuller on ps5, they are more vibrant; Series X tflops are a hoax selling point.
@@gangstagummybear3432 of course tflop doesn't matter when contract says it must be optimized on PS5 and will be the benchmark. If I bought 4090, I can't fully utilized due to that contract. Lol
Well, WZ2 is better optimized than WZ1on Xbox. WZ1 had more dips in FPS, especially in 120hz. I think you forget that WZ2 is doing so much more than the relatively simple graphics and physics of WZ1. It demands more from the machine which isn't the same as bad optimization.
why? keep in mind the the 2017 switch cant even hit 30 fps in game games at 720 alot.. so 120 if u understand tech AT ALLLLLLL again why? if ninendos profoable pokemon game is 720 p 25 fps at times and mid to far items is 15 to 3.... yes 3... why talk about 120 if 3 is a profitable thing because fanboyism? awfuly popin plz go play and review the most powerful billiondoallr companys last 2 most powerful items both are lit much much weaker then a med cell phone.... "i really wish" u understood mf basic math before posting a d sh it comment... use use lod like u know tech but cant do kid math of lod/ppi/ setttings... like gfus
@@rpospeedwagon it drops FPS by a good 10 to 20 FPS, that is meaningful buddy. this game runs at it's most optimal framerate at 90FOV and worst at 120FOV
Imagine if 4k hadn't been such a strongly push marketing bs and we could enjoy the better fps at high framerate on all TV's. These new consoles are true 1080p120fps machines but the TV market doesn't match that.
Hey, Digital Foundry, I was hoping you could make a video about the oversharpening on edges whenever the camera moves when the DLSS sharpness slider is applied and turned on. Not only this game but all others with the DLSS sharpness slider. It is very frustrating that Nvidia is unaware of it, with continuous versions of DLSS released. As a result, it has caused me to use AMD FSR 2.0 over DLSS, even though I have an Nvidia graphics card.
@@omgawesomeomg Turning it off is an option. However, the image appears to be blurrier than in previous games with DLSS without the sharpness slider feature added. While on, edges begin to get brighter and over-sharpened as the camera pans, even in cases where the sharpness slider is at its lowest value.
Interesting take.I feel like you guys skim over the issues on Xbox consoles such as lower overall frame rates (meanwhile this does get brought up by you when it's in favour of Xbox on other titles) and ghosting. I think you guys should be a little bit more objective like you were years ago. You're missing simple things now.
I think they're overall trying not to fuel console war arguments. In their video on Deathloop, it shows a consistent framerate advantage for Series X over PS5, and they similarly downplay it.
@@gavinhigham1478 That isn't fueling arguments. There's nothing wrong with pointing out the pros and cons on each system. You can do that in a respectful, objective manner and not be like "lmao Xbox sux cuz 10% less FPS lmfaoo0". Just seems like they're taking the side as to not offend Microsoft or Nvidia in their content now while still pointing out flaws in competitors. You should be doing it to all hardware or software.
Oh and, full disclosure, I am employed by Microsoft (working on Wi-Fi, not Xbox). This is just my personal opinion about what DF is trying to do, nothing about relative console performance etc.
@@FigmentHF never claimed I was great but okay. You must be blind if you couldn’t tell the difference between this lobby than your own. I’ll give you a hint one plays the game daily and the other only plays to review it
@@smokeemifyagotem8851 dude the mic is decent and one of the best things about the controller, its actually awesome that everyone has the ability to speak if they want to. Tell Microsoft to add that to their controllers next time, stop hating because the feature is not available on your console of choice
even with all the graphics and massive resolution downgrade the series s still drops fps on a cross-gen game. scared to see what happens on next-gen games.
When the 3 machines were spectating they were closer in the 120 fps, maybe the testing is not the best because the console with the player actively performing actions , the fps were lower
@@phattjohnson a couple things - I didn’t say that. It looks like they optimized it for the PS4. Secondly - that’s a silly take. HOW something is programmed, the quality of assets used, the amount of open space is all dictated by the lowest common denominator. Look at a PS4 port at max PC settings and a PS3 port at max settings. They both look the same now thst you can crank up everything? Of course they dont. So even if I WAS saying last Gen is holding us back - it is.
Developers have already corrected people that was spreading this misinformation. Like colt Eastwood and a few other TH-camrs. You don't make a game for PS4 and simply port it to another platform or even PS5 for that matter. The instructions for it to run on PS4 are different from other platforms. The game starts on PC then gets corrected (basically) to run on other platforms. You could say the target platform was PS4 so they spent more development time optimizing for PS4 (largest install base makes the most business sense)
@@rockettbuggey5990 that’s not how I meant it - meant more optimized but I see where you are coming from. From the first time on the internet I will say they was wrong
The series S version looks great. Compare this to 10yrs ago in 2012 buying a £350 Wii U + £50 Call of Duty BO II - a 720p 20-30fps game. Now for nearly half the price you can play in 1440p at 60fps
Love all of the excuses in the comments section coming out for poor Series X performance "Oh, it's just spectating mode!" (as if rendering pipeline would suddenly change completely for a single mode in a video game xD). You dudes should've just stuck to calling it a bug and left it at that, would not look as pathetic.
@@smokeemifyagotem8851 Say what you want about how much storage there is. Ps5 and Series X starts games and loads games faster than PC. Heck Alex from df tested it.
Description: "last gen findings" I remember when that used to mean PS3.. as someone who doesn't have a PS5 and is still actively using their PS4, I am not ready for this change in terminology 😭😭😭
@@JohnSmith-XYZ film grain and motion blur is not important and only makes the image look worse. Cod looks so much better without that shit. I wish they just didn't add it in at all and left it out
The Series X is supposedly more powerful but often gets smacked by the PS5 lol. And then the fact that XB has almost no quality games that can't also be played on PS5 makes it useless.
@@DoctorCyrax it depends on the game! On some games it‘s the opposite, for example death loop, the witcher 3 next gen upgrade, or a big example a plague tale requiem!! on these games the xbox pisses on the ps 5 like you say !😉 The consoles are relative similar, with a small power advantage for the xbox series x on hardware! I got both consoles, but if i have to go with only one of these, it‘s definitive the xbox, alone because of the godlike Game Pass! Even Sonys PS Plus premium is a joke against microsofts game pass! 😉
@@ApfelSgt You have TV in your name, I cant take you serious to be honest, I couldnt read all of what you had sent in that essay, but a word of advice, get a real job
I've been finding Warzone 2 to run better on my PC than Warzone 1. Frametimes more consistent and just slightly better performance all around. Mostly medium/high settings @1440p HDR with NIS Ultra Quality I get 80-100 FPS w/5600X and 5600XT. I do wish the TAA was less ghosty though.
I wish developers would give us the option to turn off Vsync on consoles. If you have a VRR display you don't need Vsync at all so I think most PS5 players would agree that having the option to turn it off is a good thing, mainly because of input lag. Don't have a VRR display and hate screen tearing? Just turn it on. Although I think due to the worse performance of the XSX it doesn't really make a difference in terms of input lag since you get about 10 frames less. Still like to have the option though, as many games on console still utilize Vsync even though all consoles already support VRR.
I'm not sure to get it ; I'm on xsx and when I turn freesync off I don't think I get vsync on ? With freesync off I get more screen tearing since frames not holding 120fps but my input lag stay consistent at 120hz ? Does freesync increase input lag other than match the Hz to the fps ?
@@kostasbousbouras2654 why? if u have a capable display and sufficient FPS it's not needed anymore, since you already have VRR/Freesync/G-Sync. The only thing where it's useful is when you're above or below the VRR range of your display but a simple framerate limiter and good enough system will eliminate those problems. Xbox for example will display 60fps games at 120Hz to mitigate those problems (55 fps will be shown at 110Hz using VRR) so essentially displaying every frame twice (or four times for 30fps titles), good for lower end Freesync displays with a minimum range of 48Hz. That's why we should have an option to disable it in-game as well so you can get lower input lag. On console it doesn't work the same as on PC with Nvidia GPU's where you could just use G-Sync in addition to Vsync with no extra input lag (because to make it work you'd have to disable Vsync ingame, and I believe most console games are vsynced through the game engine, not the display pipeline).
@@Sha0linstyle Since MW II on Xbox doesn't use Vsync, disabling Freesync will introduce tearing. That's why I said they should make this a toggle in-game so they can cater to both people with VRR displays and ones without. Technically speaking, VRR/Freesync/G-Sync increases input lag the lower the framerate drops. So when you never drop any frames at 120Hz, you essentially get an input lag of 8.33ms because that's how long it takes to display 1 frame on a 120Hz display (regardless of if you use Freesync or not). If you drop to 100fps thus freesynced to 100Hz, your input lag increases to 10ms per frame and so on - but only as long as you have 100fps, 110fps will be 9ms. You can calculate this for yourself by using 1/x*1000, where x would be the refresh rate, for example 1/120*1000=8.333333333 (ms) . In practice you won't really notice it, especially in games with 100+fps. It really makes a difference in 30 and 60fps games though, since a frame at 30fps takes 33ms and 16.67ms at 60fps to render. So by using 120Hz without VRR/Freesync/G-Sync enabled you would essentially get the same latency you'd get at 120fps, but it will obviously not feel the same since you're still at such a low framerate. That's why Xbox for example always uses 120Hz for 30fps and 60fps games (even with VRR disabled), essentially doubling or quadrupling the frames to get to 120Hz, but it doesn't work that well (I have no idea why though). It might be because the games are already hard-vsynced to their framerates and thus not making a difference but I noticed that in some 60fps games they feel more responsive in 60Hz than 120Hz. But back to your question: Just use Freesync on your Xbox. There's really no reason to not use it since at such high framerates you will not notice the 1.67ms difference at the expense of tearing if you drop to 100fps.
I've been playing on PS5 with a forced 1080 resolution because I wasn't sure I could trust the 4k 120fps performance. This is good to see, and maybe I'll give 4k a chance again, but for whatever reason the game feels smoother at 1080.
Aren't you going to talk about why series X have allot more ghosting on the gun than PS5? Its not the same temporal reconstruction technique? 9:49 is a good example
Cross platform holds games back. I can’t help but wonder how this game would really look and run if it was specifically designed for the seriesX/Ps5/PC only. Microsoft should not have released a series S but they should’ve just focus on the series X and some type of streaming box.
4:51 if you look at the foliage both Xbox versions have clear ghosting while the ps5 version doesn't, is that VRS or are they using different anti-aliasing techniques.? 5:20 ps5 has less gas rendered? makes the reflection look better.
@@DaBuffNerd It's great for gaming but every time I sit down with a hot meal and turn on HBO Max there's no volume and you have to turn it off and then back on
I just got one from Amazon for $240 with a $40 credit, so $200!? That’s a real power move from Microsoft, loss leader. Subscriptions are key to profitability.
I cant help but notice a confirmation bias in these comparisons. When Xbox performs better like in Plague's Tale Requiem, Alex muses about the superior GPU and power of Xbox being the cause. When the PS5 outperforms the Xbox, its never evidence of PS5 hardware design but rather 'bugs' or 'network differences'. Maybe, just maybe, the PS5 is a lot more effectively designed as a console than the Series X and does more with less...
What's interesting to me is that they all (including Steam Deck) use AMD's Zen2 APU. Where are the big differences coming from, especially between PS5 and Xbox Series X?
@@ElementalTJ The higher clock speed on PS5 for sure. Games love higher clockspeed over more CU, unless we are talking ray-tracing, where series x usually beats PS5 due to have 52 CU vs 36 CU on PS5.
He said at the end the game is buggy as hell with crashes. Plague tale is a pretty well optimised game so if one console performs better than the other its down to hardware differences not buggy ports like cod. I own this game even the menu is laggy. Very poor ports from activision but they don't care they just want the holiday season money instead of delaying it a few months like other devs are.
Once again Series S still proving it can more than hold its own when properly optimized. Considering the ridiculously low settings I've seen competitive PC players use in games like these strictly to have every little advantage they can get away with, the argument Series S is holding "Next-gen" continues to blow my mind. DF should show want the bottom of the barely lowest PC settings that many new titles have just to show how low PC still has to account for and then compare to where Series S fits in. I know most enthusiast are more concerned about the upper limit but I think most people don't know how low the bottom of PC still is.
@G P If the PS5's quality and performance leaves people crying I don't know what they want from a game it looks and plays fine. But really look at the specs between them the CPU difference is very minimum when the Series X is using multithreading (unlike any game will not use it to be honest) the X GPU is more powerful than the PS5's but the PS5's runs at quite abit higher clock speed which seems to be helping the PS5. Raw power doesnt make a console better the PS3 destroyed the 360 in regard to specs (mainly CPU) but the 360 destroyed the PS3 in how the games ran (Aside from those by Sony themselves)
Amazing how we have gotten to a point that unfinished games are fully released so commonly that the game breaking bugs are now called "teething issues" and are considered normal...
No it doesnt, ps5 will drop arround 100 fps also,
@@promo130 ps5 is only 120 but the xbox droped even down
U Show this Video?
We should all demand refunds for the free game
well thats how games have been for the past 7/8years, i suppose the plus side is that they can patch them, i know i know, games shiouldnt be shit when they come out, but if you look at games on the 6th gen consoels, if they werre fuck, they were fucked, you had to wait for a new disc to be publishjed and purchase it again, if you wanted the glitches fixed
You clearly didn't grow up playing video games or are to young to know, it's always been like this, except pre-internet there was no patches ...it was just fuckd up permanently
Would love to know how the sharpening feature and FOV changes in consoles change the FPS count and fidelity. Please and thank you DF!
This would have been great! Definitely hope they see this suggestion.
Got fov at 110, never drops under 100
I can tell you right away, in this game more FOV means better FPS (but only by a tiny bit. maybe 2-3 fps). Same for Sharpening. Sharpening is only a filter and costs maybe 1 or 2 fps
@@Novskyy621 the other way arround buddy, thats why they didnt do an fov on wz1 on ps4, ps4 coudnt handle it
@@promo130 No, it suprised me too. Go watch some videos about it. Its a very rare case
I would be very interested to see the 120FPS results in the traditional 6v6 MP on the consoles.
Both consoles are basically a locked 120 fps on 6v6, occasionally dips in groundwar, but nothing too bad.
They already covered that in a previous video
@@justsaying993 That's my bad - I will check that out for sure! LOVE DF
@@fwabble all good. You know DF. They’ll title their video on one thing and cover like 2 billion things in the video 🙄so I don’t blame you for not knowing LOL
@@justsaying993 These are big facts lmao
Hopefully it gets FSR 2.1, I think the ghosting caused by the TAA is quite noticeable and we'll get a sharper image along with it.
fps games like this likely wont get fsr 2, as it adds input lag because it samples data from multiple frames.
DLSS/boost I get get 144 locked (138 with gsync)
@@molsen7549 it doesn't really add noticeable latency and they can pair it with more aggressive dynamic resolution scaling, which would improve latency as you'd get more frames. If either FSR or DLSS improves performance it also improves latency.
We need more Tom! It feels like he's been working part-time for the last couple years. Would love to see him back on the podcast
They're slowly pushing out the British members for americans. Makes me sick.
@Infinity Synthesis Tom is OG digital foundry. If Richard is reducing his workload, that's not ok at all.
@@BDreGaming if I had to guess I’d think DF doesn’t pay that much and Tom probably decided to do it part time as a passion project. Just like Audi got another job but still does DF
I'd also like to see Tom in more videos. His analysis is always solid. He's a good lad.
@@BDreGaming Why is it not ok at all? Who wouldn't be happy with a reduced workload, assuming the pay is the same?
I bought a PS5 and now I can play Black Ops 3 with no frame dips on zombies 4 player split screen
Great video, I had been waiting to see testing like this. I am on PS5 but genuinely impressed by the Series S. I have to admit, I am disappointed there was no testing done on a wider FOV between 110-120. Console players had been asking for FOV slider for years so that was a huge selling point with this game. Playing on 80 FOV seem outdated and more of an old console setting. Next gen users most likely won't be playing at 80 FOV.
What does FOV means ?
🤔
@@Omar-kl3xp Field of View, a lower FOV would make your view small.
But a high FOV will give you a big view.
Not big difference 5fps+>
Ps4 pro offers up to fov 120 and that’s last gen system I use to play lol
Really love these analysis videos. I can tell an awful amount of work must go into putting them together. Looking forward to the next one to see how the previous gen consoles do. Keep up the great work guys !
I wish there was a setting for how much motion blur is applied; sometimes it looks right, sometimes it looks like too much. Not complaining though, this is the best looking CoD so far, _in my opinion_
Clever way to run the comparison using the spectator mode. Awesome breakdown!
What still amazes me is the amount of pop-in on the newer consoles. Especillay since that was one of the selling-points of Sony for the PS5 and the SSD communication.
Even on a higher end PC there are issues with that. I think it’s just the engine. It’s not good at distant level of detail.
Look up how UE5 is improving on LOD. Great stuff with that.
@@garrvict no there's not.
@@mr.blonde7812 yes there are and you are an ignorant if you dont know that
@@mr.blonde7812 yes there is, pop in happens in all games no matter how much you spend. LOD is LOD and LODs are gonna LOD. Nanite seems tk be coming to the rescue.
Besides, pretty much every COD streamer on PC has way worse graphics settings than even series S, aliased, unstable images with 300 FPS
Im so impressed. I have played this on a strong pc with rtx 3080 and 12700k and on ps5….i had a MUCH (!) smoother and more enjoyable experience on Playstation…thats crazy! You could argue that the pc-version is just poorly optimized, but the pc should run circles around the consoles…but the freezes, stutters and framedrops (70-160fps) mame the pc such a inconsistent experience, that i currently much prefer the PS5version…crazy.
I feel like it has to be optimization. PCs are more powerful, after all.
@@Brisingr73it’s an optimization issue. IW optimized the console versions which run perfect on PS5/XSX. While the PC version is being optimized by a different studio called beenox.
@@Kryptix0III Oh wow, yeah I've heard of Beenox. Do they have a bad reputation for optimization? Was MW1 bad on PC?
What are you talking about? It's the same game, hence the cross-play.
@@Brisingr73 no point in all the power of you can’t use it
No FOV testing is criminal, DF.
There's FPS FOV tests with PC's since warzone 1. It remains the same.
@@winrargameplays Totally irrelevant but ok.
@@ppsonOK. They done a test for the old gen this week. Guess what? :) it remains the same most of the time. The main problem with the old generation of consoles is that they struggle at any FOV
@@winrargameplays I saw that video, and it did affect the FPS even if it wasn't too much. But, they forgot to compare the resolution. If you have to sacrifice detail for FPS then you might opt for a lower FOV. I have the Series X and LG C2. I don't notice a significant drop in FPS with higher FOV, but haven't done a lot of testing. I run 90 FOV, not for FPS but I found it feels right. Lately I've been reverting to running Warzone in 60 FPS since you get so much more detail and draw distance. You can see people across the map.
@@ppson wtf you can't change resolution on consoles
Given the success of Warzone and IW's push into truly massive maps, I'd love to see COD's campaign mode expand to include Metro Exodus style sandbox levels. I feel like that's a great midpoint between COD's classic heavily scripted, linear singleplayer experience with the freedom of Warzone's open environment.
Playing this on PS5 on an A90J OLED with VRR looks incredible
I have the A80J also with vrr, I can't imagine it looking better which it does with the A90j
@@Oceanandskylinevidss I’ve seen the A80J it’s no a huge difference to be honest you aren’t missing out at all it just dissipates image Retention bit better they’re awesome TVs
Can we please get a PC specific video on this game? The optimized settings/comparisons are always immensely helpful!!
Yea I need that. This game looks and runs great on ps5 but on my pc I can’t get it to hit a nice 60 without seriously turn down settings which isn’t normal
@@NothingHereForYou From what I've heard it's a CPU bottleneck, I'm getting a solid 110 fps maxed out without DLSS or 140ish with DLSS but still get stutters with a very heavily overclocked 12700k.
@@datatron100 might be my reason then I already deleted since it kept crashing
15:34. Wow that's some pretty gross weapon ghosting on the Xbox consoles as compared to PS5. They are definitely not the same in that shot.
He probably forgot to disable motion Blur for wepons
That ain’t motion blur, that trail is a LOT larger than the weapon moves in a single frame, motion blur is always smaller and, you know, actually looks like blur, not like multiple copies of the gun.
De always want to project ps5 superiority, that is made on purpose, xbox mops the floor by a huge margin in 120 mode and did not make ghosting, somebody explain that and I will not repeat that.
@@acevedoaandres I think they are fair with respect to console competition but this is another instance of ghosting gone unaddressed. It's a major distraction that should be scrutinized on all platforms.
And in the same the shadows or taa looks sharper in a lot of scence on the ps5. Maybe a bug on the sx.
meanwhile gotham knights can't handle 2 players and an empty map
I love your username
@@RandomGamingMoments925 hmm I wonder why
Would love to have a bf2042 tech review on pc now that season 3 brings better performance.
I tried it last night and it is massively better. I have an rtx 3070 and was playing it in 4k with dlss @ 100fps. The open beta had me running the game in 1440p @ 45-55fps.
@@MrCheesegr8r 2080 ti, exactly the same experience. 45 - 55 in the beta and around 90-100 at 1440p DLSS in season 3. CPU bound on an oc 9700k
That game is straight up garbage
One thing that i find strange is when we have the 3 way comparison you can see ghosting in the Series X I S footage but it is absent in the PS5 footage. You can see this ghosting at the 9:48 mark in the XBX footage if you look at the scope while it is paning over the water surface but it is absent in the PS5 side. You can see it even more clearly at the at the 15:39 mark if you watch the scope of the weapon , again , you see heavy ghosting.Why is that?
Hardware advantages which is part of Sonys deal with Activision, it’s pretty much confirmed considering that Sony demanded that Microsoft do not do any hardware advantages on Xbox if they are going to let them acquire Activision
@@zackariasevertson7733 tbh it's probably just a bug
@@zackariasevertson7733 I see you are unaware of the legal troubles that would cause, because if that were true we would be hearing about MS sueing ABK instead of trying to buy them.
@@zackariasevertson7733 Why would ghosting have anything to do with a Sony Activision deal and how would ghosting have anything to do with any hardware advantage at all? Either it's a bug , a DF capture difference or both at the same time. Either way definitely not because of a deal between 2 companys.
@@zackariasevertson7733 conspiratorial nonsense
Let’s not forget that you can get a series S for £189 now. That’s madness for the performance it puts out, it’s amazing.
LOL NO
Insane value.
Ill never go digital till physical dies, i just got MW2 for £11 with trade in
@@-pressxtostart- technically you are already digital. All you have bought is a hyperlink to a download .
Yeah, the Series S totally kills it for this price. I mean, for 189 you‘ve got a controller with it which is 50 alone 😂
A no brainer and well designed
It looks great and plays great on my PS5 and LGCX in "120fps" mode. It's like the best of Blackout and Warzone combined.
runs better on pc and xbox, ms wins again
@@nick13b did you even watch the video
@@nick13b
Cool story troll.
Would love to see a PC tech review for this game and just Modern Warfare 2 mp and campaign.
This is the first time my consoles run a BR game better than my PC. Could probably use a few more optimization patches on that side ;p
@@KindOldRaven and less crashes :D
@@KindOldRaven same over here xD my 2k$ pc runs worse than my 399$ ps5 xD
@@KindOldRaven then your PC is a POS
it would just be a compilation of crashes
8:20 that ghosting in the sight and and no mention? :O
Very surprised with PS5 just powering through. Barely a single frame drop.
Why are u suprised the specs on the consoles arent tht far apart mfkas been telling u stop letting xbox use the teraflop numbers to think its extremely more powerful not the case
Apparently ps5 High clock is very good for 120fps modes
@@leoni7649 lol
@@leoni7649 😭😭😭😭😭
The ps5 gpu have a higher overclock that’s why they run better in most games
Yesss, finally. I'm hoping for optimized PC settings too
I'm always curious what PC settings match with the settings that are used in PS5 or XBSX. Wish someone would figure that out.
I don't think Alex likes doing online shooter analysis due to them being difficult to capture. Battlefield 2042 was another that was skipped in that regard, no optimised settings that time either.
samething i wonder
@@skoprowskilow- medium with all the useless settings like film grain turned off
@@_Quint_ I‘m not talking about CPU performance. Graphics settling only affect the GPU for the most part, whether that‘s done in the campaign, multiplayer or Warzone doesn’t really matter
I would love to see a PC analysis of this game! I would love to see if you guys have found a way to mitigate the crashing. It sucks when you are more afraid of the game crashing than getting killed by an enemy.
the latest nvidia drivers absolutely tanked the game, there's already a patch on nvidia's website to fix this specific issue
@@weeaboojones2451 Do you have a link? I have driver version 526.98 installed. If you look in Steam forums, its something happening to everyone. I haven't seen any definitive fix, just a lot of theories.
Performance tanked when warzone 2.0 came out. I had much better FPS in multiplayer before the patch. 204 FPS on 4090 before and 184 after on AVG in mw2 benchmark. Some people say it's due to low shaders being thrown into medium shaders option or something like that.
@@pokemon1666 at what reso/settings?
So PS5 has a lead of 10 to 15fps, and NO screen tearing!?!
PS5 for the WIN!
who has the marketing rights for the game? this answers your question why 🤣
So why did the ps5 out performed XSX in ASSASSINS CREED VALHALLA?
xbox had marketing right and exclusive content for the game as well🤔.....
Including the:
*"XBOX SERIES X OPTIMIZED"*
😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👍
@@alexperez1519 2 years old lol
But it had marketing rights, so why didn't the XSX out performed ps5?
Hey that's your argument, not mine.🤷🏻♂️
Back in the it was the tools, two years later is what? "marketing deal" lol
Keep crying!😏👌
@@alexperez1519 they waiting on the tools still. 😂💀
I really wish you'd start adding timestamps to your videos.
They used to and then they stopped. I guess that's a Patreon exclusive as well. I hate that they hold back content for money which is weird because they are a part of and funded by Eurogamer.
I’m actually impressed with the series S to be honest. Activision really knows how to use console hardware.
Devs devving.
Impressed with 720p? 😆
@@ConnorH2111 you do know that most don’t even have a high end 4K TV right? Why must you be so ignorant of that fact and treat those that are not affluent as lesser human beings? I’m glad that there is a lesser price option for those that have limited budgets. I’m grateful for being able to afford all the platforms and devices. Don’t forget how lucky you are.
@@BruceRichwineJr you dont need a 4K TV to enjoy new gen consoles but 720p is a joke, Nobody is playing in 720p in 2022.
@@ConnorH2111 switch can't even run tho but are you talking tge switch 480i(
new df yeees. This channel is sucha big part of my mental wellbeing, for real. Love your work fellas.
I get this comment. stay strong brother
Shame that most PC players on WZ these days tend to aim for such high FPS that they're happy with their game looking like a PS2 game visually.
It's all about winning. shame consoles don't have the option to even do that
All hail the PC virgin race. 🙌😂
@@mancuniangamecat8288 said the kid with a plastic toy box lmao
I always assumed that the lack of image stability would be a hinderance in a game focused around spotting movement, but no… apparently jaggy, shimmering visuals are preferred
*watches video, sees consoles hit 1080p to keep 60 fps.
*Finds comment from clear console putz stating that it looks bad on PC’s with higher settings and frame rates
*laughs hysterically
Ps5 really is a true beast isn't it
no, we all know the Series X is ahead slightly - but of course, people like you only blame the devs when your console doesnt "win" some BS "war".
Ps5 runs at a higher over clock
@@JaviiSaysoand? It still only results in 10.2 teraflops.frequency is only half the equation for teraflops.
Yea
@@xBINARYGODxDigital foundry are experts of worldwide recognition. The latter channels mainly share videos so that their favorite platform wins. It's literally blatant. Digital foundry is not just an ordinary channel that compares the framerate test. They got XSX as one of the first to know the test because they are respected. Digital foundry breaks down the game exactly as it is, not like the other channels when it is clearly visible that it is it's completely different
15:31 lol 💀 the chat be wild 🤣
Playing this on a 55inch screen with VRR and Hdmi 2.1 is a real dream
Playing it on a monitor is the real dream I have both 😵💫
@@Zander0777 I have 144hz monitor but it isn't an Oled. Doesn't even compare in terms of colors coming off the screen. I have a desk about 7 feet back from the TV and I can play on it comfortably with mouse and keyboard on my ps5 👌
@AnswerToEverything lol do you think I'm sitting two feet away? I said I have my desk far back from the Tv
Correction: playing it on a Qled 55inch vrr 120fps is not only a cheat code but a dream with PS5. The advantages I have and with the haptic triggers turned on! Your losing if it is off because I can rest my fingers HEAVY on the trigger so when something is in my cross hairs there is zero input lag and I always get the first shot off like a quick draw at sundown.
Try doing that without haptic and your likely to fire without meaning too whilst I'm am already halfway down on the trigger giving me the edge to get to full shot first. By a hair.
Oled is great for colors but vrr is not very good. That input delay is nasty. Consoles can't even use reflex so that's a bummer. Glad I can kill more people that use 55" vrr tv's with 10-15ms input delay.
Hope you all realize this is why pc players buy high refresh displays. So they don't have to use vrr and get tons of input delay.
Great Stuff. I wish you just did a little snippet at the end with max FOV.
I have fov at 110 out of 120
fps never drops below 100 on ps5 , most of the times its arround 120 fps
@@promo130 stop the cap
FOV won't have any effect on FPS At all. It's not rendering anything extra.
@@damagecase13 wrong
Maybe a test where the ps5 is the one in the real game and both series consoles spectating? Or would it be the same result?
Same, the game is being rendered by the hardware
Brilliant, I've been looking forward to this one.
Im surprised and impressed at image quality on Series S here. Sure statically it’s not great, but during gameplay it’s more than fine!
sounds like copium to me
@@heyy-yaa I game on PC and Series X. What I saw here is still impressive.
@@heyy-yaa If you cared about power you wouldn't get the Series S. The performance and looks are good if not great for a budget machine. You're simply not the target audience.
I wonder if locking the resolution to 1440P would help further smooth things out on Series X and PS5
nah because even if you set it to 1080. it wont affect the game's internal res
@@CallumSk8er If you weren't aware some games are affected by the consoles resolution settings it's just not many devs leave it to the system and choose to have a straight forward approach.
Its already smooth on 4k
Looks great plays great
I would like to know exactly that too...
@@promo130 But I'm asking if it can be smoother at a lower resolution
Is it just me or do the Xbox consoles have horrendous TAA artifacts while the PS5 sees none?
But...but...but those 12 Tflops. 😂
Yep, All those Xbox fanboys on FB chest thumping and telling people their console is better are now sweating a little.
12 Tflops never mattered, the GPU ram is split into 2 pools, only 10 of the gigs of ram are at the higher bandwidth, and some of that is allocated for other functions on the system, the system was doomed to always have bottlenecks. Another thing no one ever talks about anymore, is how washed out colors seem to look on Series X, whereas the colors are fuller on ps5, they are more vibrant; Series X tflops are a hoax selling point.
As any informed person would know, teraflops is meaningless.
Regardless, as long as you are having fun then it's a win.
@@gangstagummybear3432 of course tflop doesn't matter when contract says it must be optimized on PS5 and will be the benchmark. If I bought 4090, I can't fully utilized due to that contract. Lol
@@prodj.mixapeofficial6431 I cant see the rest of your comment after "due to that"
Crazy how Well optimized Warzone 1 was on my PS5 and pc, and 2.0 is horrendously optimized especially on pc
Thank infinity ward, raven software always does it right
Well, WZ2 is better optimized than WZ1on Xbox. WZ1 had more dips in FPS, especially in 120hz. I think you forget that WZ2 is doing so much more than the relatively simple graphics and physics of WZ1. It demands more from the machine which isn't the same as bad optimization.
@@ppson you sussy Baka
@@josepineda8902 …. Thanks?
When the PC comparison and Alex's Optimized settings coming???
Yep, I’d like to see a 400/500$ pc compared to a 400/500$ console, that’s a fair comparison
There are Optimised settings online already if you look on Reddit.
fr i need to hear alex being pissed about them getting rid of ray tracing
@@montewhite320 Not really as a PC even a weaker one will still play infinitely more games than any console and can do infinitely more things
@@219SilverChoc yes but I'm talking about PC vs PS5 equivalent graphics settings like they did it with Spiderman Miles morales and other games too.
If the Xbox Series S has some struggles I'm curious to know how the old 2013 Xbox One runs this game.
60fps lower resolution
@@weltvonoben no way it’s 60fps
@@thefreshprince310 it is
@@weltvonoben 40-55 fps is not 60fps
@@henrik5299 50-60 FPS base PS4 and almost 60 most of the time on Pro
What about framerate test with 120 FOV? Test 80 FOV doesn't make sense, because anyone who knows anything about warzone will increase the fov.
Really wish he would have talked about the awful pop in on 120 fps modes and low lod on everything medium to far range
why? keep in mind the the 2017 switch cant even hit 30 fps in game games at 720 alot.. so 120 if u understand tech AT ALLLLLLL again why? if ninendos profoable pokemon game is 720 p 25 fps at times and mid to far items is 15 to 3.... yes 3... why talk about 120 if 3 is a profitable thing because fanboyism? awfuly popin plz go play and review the most powerful billiondoallr companys last 2 most powerful items both are lit much much weaker then a med cell phone.... "i really wish" u understood mf basic math before posting a d sh it comment... use use lod like u know tech but cant do kid math of lod/ppi/ setttings... like gfus
@@simlife445 "I really wish" I understood a single sentence you just typed out
You should have tested all machines with high fov as well. Absolutely zero reason anyone should be playing at 80fov anymore now that wz2 exists…
FOV shouldn't have any meaningful fps changes. Common "myth."
There won't be any change.
Spoke like a true console plebian. FOV should have absolutely no issue on fps
With increased FOV everything is smaller/further away though, is it not?
It's not ultrawide.
@@rpospeedwagon it drops FPS by a good 10 to 20 FPS, that is meaningful buddy. this game runs at it's most optimal framerate at 90FOV and worst at 120FOV
Imagine if 4k hadn't been such a strongly push marketing bs and we could enjoy the better fps at high framerate on all TV's. These new consoles are true 1080p120fps machines but the TV market doesn't match that.
720p lmao, and people were argueing the Series S wasn't holding back video game development.
This must’ve been simultaneously hilarious and harrowing to try and capture.
Time for Activision to switch to Unreal Engine 5.1! 🤣🤣🤣
Yea man! UE5.1 looks generational ahead of this easily imo.
Hey, Digital Foundry, I was hoping you could make a video about the oversharpening on edges whenever the camera moves when the DLSS sharpness slider is applied and turned on. Not only this game but all others with the DLSS sharpness slider. It is very frustrating that Nvidia is unaware of it, with continuous versions of DLSS released. As a result, it has caused me to use AMD FSR 2.0 over DLSS, even though I have an Nvidia graphics card.
Sounds like an oversharpening artifact to me. Just turn sharpening off or lower it until the effect goes away.
That’s what the sharpening slider does. And DF has talked about a few times already. Just turn it off, or very very low.
@@omgawesomeomg Turning it off is an option. However, the image appears to be blurrier than in previous games with DLSS without the sharpness slider feature added. While on, edges begin to get brighter and over-sharpened as the camera pans, even in cases where the sharpness slider is at its lowest value.
Interesting take.I feel like you guys skim over the issues on Xbox consoles such as lower overall frame rates (meanwhile this does get brought up by you when it's in favour of Xbox on other titles) and ghosting. I think you guys should be a little bit more objective like you were years ago. You're missing simple things now.
I think they're overall trying not to fuel console war arguments. In their video on Deathloop, it shows a consistent framerate advantage for Series X over PS5, and they similarly downplay it.
@@gavinhigham1478 That isn't fueling arguments. There's nothing wrong with pointing out the pros and cons on each system. You can do that in a respectful, objective manner and not be like "lmao Xbox sux cuz 10% less FPS lmfaoo0". Just seems like they're taking the side as to not offend Microsoft or Nvidia in their content now while still pointing out flaws in competitors. You should be doing it to all hardware or software.
@@gavinhigham1478 I guess they shouldn’t title the video “vs” then?
@@-Grifter I mean, they can still take advantage of the mild clickbait without causing any drama. That's my guess at what they're doing.
Oh and, full disclosure, I am employed by Microsoft (working on Wi-Fi, not Xbox). This is just my personal opinion about what DF is trying to do, nothing about relative console performance etc.
Not only do we get a performance analysis through these videos but we also get gameplay on how sbmm works. I wish my lobbies played like that
You’re likely just no where near as good as you imagine you are. It’s almost always the case
@@FigmentHF never claimed I was great but okay. You must be blind if you couldn’t tell the difference between this lobby than your own. I’ll give you a hint one plays the game daily and the other only plays to review it
Tell me you're insecure without telling me you're insecure
Strict SBMM is a myth bads tell themselves to cope with losing matches now they can't just pubstomp locals from their town round after round.
If you can’t find the bots… you are the bot
Another One for PS5. Having a mic on every controller is a huge win with proximity chat.
hahhaahaha stop lying have you watch the video ?
Hahahaha that controller mic is complete trash and so is the 3d audio headset
@@smokeemifyagotem8851 Sounds like you don't own a PS5 mate, better luck next time.
@@piensluc7444 I did bro, 120fp runs better on PS5.
@@smokeemifyagotem8851 dude the mic is decent and one of the best things about the controller, its actually awesome that everyone has the ability to speak if they want to.
Tell Microsoft to add that to their controllers next time, stop hating because the feature is not available on your console of choice
even with all the graphics and massive resolution downgrade the series s still drops fps on a cross-gen game. scared to see what happens on next-gen games.
When the 3 machines were spectating they were closer in the 120 fps, maybe the testing is not the best because the console with the player actively performing actions , the fps were lower
What compromises are made to image quality in 120fps mode over that of 60fps. I don't think he mentioned it in the comparisons.
Resolution I believe
Yea! Thanks for making this video I was waiting 😂
Seems like they made the best ps4 game they could and then ported it to other systems
Scalability is the name of the game. I can tweak settings that will cripple my PC, so I'm not sure it's fair to say 'last gen' is holding us back.
@@phattjohnson a couple things - I didn’t say that. It looks like they optimized it for the PS4. Secondly - that’s a silly take. HOW something is programmed, the quality of assets used, the amount of open space is all dictated by the lowest common denominator. Look at a PS4 port at max PC settings and a PS3 port at max settings. They both look the same now thst you can crank up everything? Of course they dont. So even if I WAS saying last Gen is holding us back - it is.
Developers have already corrected people that was spreading this misinformation. Like colt Eastwood and a few other TH-camrs. You don't make a game for PS4 and simply port it to another platform or even PS5 for that matter. The instructions for it to run on PS4 are different from other platforms. The game starts on PC then gets corrected (basically) to run on other platforms. You could say the target platform was PS4 so they spent more development time optimizing for PS4 (largest install base makes the most business sense)
@@rockettbuggey5990 that’s not how I meant it - meant more optimized but I see where you are coming from. From the first time on the internet I will say they was wrong
Finally! Been waiting for this
The series S version looks great. Compare this to 10yrs ago in 2012 buying a £350 Wii U + £50 Call of Duty BO II - a 720p 20-30fps game. Now for nearly half the price you can play in 1440p at 60fps
parents have the VCR xbox and thats my machine for the holidays. Gonna be heating the whole basement.
Love all of the excuses in the comments section coming out for poor Series X performance "Oh, it's just spectating mode!" (as if rendering pipeline would suddenly change completely for a single mode in a video game xD). You dudes should've just stuck to calling it a bug and left it at that, would not look as pathetic.
Battaglia's Optimized Settings ... still cookin
VRR seems to really work well with this game
crashes and such issues 14:58 are also present on pc , i have a rtx 3080 and ryzen 5 5600 and i had experienced all of that
Because the network has nothing to do with your hardware.
Ps5 and their SSD, fantastic
Lmao garbage ssd actually. 600gb of storage? So this game takes up 1/3 of it? Talk about next gen lmao garbage
@@smokeemifyagotem8851 it’s 825 total. 670 ish usable. Much cheaper to add more storage than the Xbox.
Warzone 2.0 PS5 is 65 gigs.
@@MegaDizz23 talking about the whole game not just the br lol
@@smokeemifyagotem8851 Say what you want about how much storage there is. Ps5 and Series X starts games and loads games faster than PC. Heck Alex from df tested it.
Description: "last gen findings"
I remember when that used to mean PS3.. as someone who doesn't have a PS5 and is still actively using their PS4, I am not ready for this change in terminology 😭😭😭
hopefully everyone will watch and remember to turn off the film grain and motion blur in their own game :)
Never turn off such important graphical features. Really wish devs wouldn't give the option.
@@JohnSmith-XYZ film grain and motion blur is not important and only makes the image look worse. Cod looks so much better without that shit. I wish they just didn't add it in at all and left it out
Disappointed they didn't cover CAS and it's impact on visual quality and performance.
Wtf.. only reason i clicked
The Series X is supposedly more powerful but often gets smacked by the PS5 lol. And then the fact that XB has almost no quality games that can't also be played on PS5 makes it useless.
Playing this on series on my LG G2 65 inch with VRR the gme looks incredible !!
@@piensluc7444 Lmao it doesnt, not on Series or X 😂😂😂😂 PS just pisses on Xbox yet again
@@DoctorCyrax it depends on the game!
On some games it‘s the opposite, for example death loop, the witcher 3 next gen upgrade, or a big example a plague tale requiem!! on these games the xbox pisses on the ps 5 like you say !😉
The consoles are relative similar, with a small power advantage for the xbox series x on hardware!
I got both consoles, but if i have to go with only one of these, it‘s definitive the xbox, alone because of the godlike Game Pass!
Even Sonys PS Plus premium is a joke against microsofts game pass! 😉
@@ApfelSgt You have TV in your name, I cant take you serious to be honest, I couldnt read all of what you had sent in that essay, but a word of advice, get a real job
I know I'm late but do we really gotta shit on each other's consoles?
Whetr is the PC video guys? We have been waiting for weeks
I've been finding Warzone 2 to run better on my PC than Warzone 1. Frametimes more consistent and just slightly better performance all around. Mostly medium/high settings @1440p HDR with NIS Ultra Quality I get 80-100 FPS w/5600X and 5600XT. I do wish the TAA was less ghosty though.
Está muito bom então
Can't wait for the Stutter Struggle Calisto Protocol pc video.
We want to see if FOV changes the performance.....
It doesn't. But why don't you try for yourself?
It doesn't
It doesn’t lol u can try for yourself
I wish developers would give us the option to turn off Vsync on consoles. If you have a VRR display you don't need Vsync at all so I think most PS5 players would agree that having the option to turn it off is a good thing, mainly because of input lag. Don't have a VRR display and hate screen tearing? Just turn it on. Although I think due to the worse performance of the XSX it doesn't really make a difference in terms of input lag since you get about 10 frames less. Still like to have the option though, as many games on console still utilize Vsync even though all consoles already support VRR.
Vsync should NEVER be turned off...
I'm not sure to get it ; I'm on xsx and when I turn freesync off I don't think I get vsync on ? With freesync off I get more screen tearing since frames not holding 120fps but my input lag stay consistent at 120hz ? Does freesync increase input lag other than match the Hz to the fps ?
@@kostasbousbouras2654 why? if u have a capable display and sufficient FPS it's not needed anymore, since you already have VRR/Freesync/G-Sync. The only thing where it's useful is when you're above or below the VRR range of your display but a simple framerate limiter and good enough system will eliminate those problems. Xbox for example will display 60fps games at 120Hz to mitigate those problems (55 fps will be shown at 110Hz using VRR) so essentially displaying every frame twice (or four times for 30fps titles), good for lower end Freesync displays with a minimum range of 48Hz. That's why we should have an option to disable it in-game as well so you can get lower input lag. On console it doesn't work the same as on PC with Nvidia GPU's where you could just use G-Sync in addition to Vsync with no extra input lag (because to make it work you'd have to disable Vsync ingame, and I believe most console games are vsynced through the game engine, not the display pipeline).
@@Sha0linstyle Since MW II on Xbox doesn't use Vsync, disabling Freesync will introduce tearing. That's why I said they should make this a toggle in-game so they can cater to both people with VRR displays and ones without.
Technically speaking, VRR/Freesync/G-Sync increases input lag the lower the framerate drops. So when you never drop any frames at 120Hz, you essentially get an input lag of 8.33ms because that's how long it takes to display 1 frame on a 120Hz display (regardless of if you use Freesync or not). If you drop to 100fps thus freesynced to 100Hz, your input lag increases to 10ms per frame and so on - but only as long as you have 100fps, 110fps will be 9ms. You can calculate this for yourself by using 1/x*1000, where x would be the refresh rate, for example 1/120*1000=8.333333333 (ms) . In practice you won't really notice it, especially in games with 100+fps. It really makes a difference in 30 and 60fps games though, since a frame at 30fps takes 33ms and 16.67ms at 60fps to render. So by using 120Hz without VRR/Freesync/G-Sync enabled you would essentially get the same latency you'd get at 120fps, but it will obviously not feel the same since you're still at such a low framerate. That's why Xbox for example always uses 120Hz for 30fps and 60fps games (even with VRR disabled), essentially doubling or quadrupling the frames to get to 120Hz, but it doesn't work that well (I have no idea why though). It might be because the games are already hard-vsynced to their framerates and thus not making a difference but I noticed that in some 60fps games they feel more responsive in 60Hz than 120Hz.
But back to your question: Just use Freesync on your Xbox. There's really no reason to not use it since at such high framerates you will not notice the 1.67ms difference at the expense of tearing if you drop to 100fps.
so does ps5 120fps games have v sync on by default on no
What about the fidelityfx option? How is it working in consoles?
I've been playing on PS5 with a forced 1080 resolution because I wasn't sure I could trust the 4k 120fps performance. This is good to see, and maybe I'll give 4k a chance again, but for whatever reason the game feels smoother at 1080.
Still waiting on that 40 percent delta between the series x and ps5 that xbox fans were claiming.
"Wait until developers start optimizing their games for Xbox" said the xbot in the year of 2056
@@leoni7649 "Wait until next E3" Said almost 10 E3's ago 😂😂
Those 10 fps extras on ps5 are time exclusive, right?
XD
Aren't you going to talk about why series X have allot more ghosting on the gun than PS5?
Its not the same temporal reconstruction technique?
9:49 is a good example
Don't cry xbot series s is trash
@@billpogi23 I'm talking about series X . At last try to read my post before talking nonsense.
Aww, this isn't gonna have that primo Xbox One S footage.
Cross platform holds games back. I can’t help but wonder how this game would really look and run if it was specifically designed for the seriesX/Ps5/PC only. Microsoft should not have released a series S but they should’ve just focus on the series X and some type of streaming box.
I’ve never seen a comments section on a DF video I had less in common with than this one. Have fun.
When the heck r those extra TFlops on the series x going to show up?
Maybe in 2027 when tools arrive 🤣🤣
4:51 if you look at the foliage both Xbox versions have clear ghosting while the ps5 version doesn't, is that VRS or are they using different anti-aliasing techniques.?
5:20 ps5 has less gas rendered? makes the reflection look better.
Funny I get the full 120 on both series x and ps5
Thank God for variable refresh rate and these new T v's I have seen 0 screen tearing on my c1 and my TCL6 series
I've heard good things about the TCL6 series. Might be my next buy.
@@DaBuffNerd It's great for gaming but every time I sit down with a hot meal and turn on HBO Max there's no volume and you have to turn it off and then back on
The Series S is the tech bargain of the year. Crazy value for money.
I just got one from Amazon for $240 with a $40 credit, so $200!? That’s a real power move from Microsoft, loss leader. Subscriptions are key to profitability.
Meh. Just 25% cheaper than a PS5. The extra 100 bucks is more than worth the upgrade IMO.
@@ricepony33 What's crazy about what you just said is the MS lawyers don't feel the same way.
@@JorisKeijser series S is £250. PS5 is £450. I won’t bother doing the sums 👍
@@illgottengains1314 Digital PS5 is £390
Real life shadows are relatively blurry when the object is somewhat distant. I hate how modern games make all shadows so sharp
I cant help but notice a confirmation bias in these comparisons. When Xbox performs better like in Plague's Tale Requiem, Alex muses about the superior GPU and power of Xbox being the cause. When the PS5 outperforms the Xbox, its never evidence of PS5 hardware design but rather 'bugs' or 'network differences'. Maybe, just maybe, the PS5 is a lot more effectively designed as a console than the Series X and does more with less...
What's interesting to me is that they all (including Steam Deck) use AMD's Zen2 APU. Where are the big differences coming from, especially between PS5 and Xbox Series X?
@@ElementalTJ The higher clock speed on PS5 for sure. Games love higher clockspeed over more CU, unless we are talking ray-tracing, where series x usually beats PS5 due to have 52 CU vs 36 CU on PS5.
Like how he said warzone on series s runs up to 1440,. While the series x and ps5 run at 4k.
@@reyesarsenal9 Thanks partner. That's probably in-part due to the liquid cooling of PS5, I'd guess.
He said at the end the game is buggy as hell with crashes. Plague tale is a pretty well optimised game so if one console performs better than the other its down to hardware differences not buggy ports like cod. I own this game even the menu is laggy. Very poor ports from activision but they don't care they just want the holiday season money instead of delaying it a few months like other devs are.
thanks for ur effort , really helpful for new gamers
Those new PS5 updates have helped.
I've been loving warzone and DMZ mode. I play on series X and I haven't got a problem. The gunplay is so fun
Once again Series S still proving it can more than hold its own when properly optimized. Considering the ridiculously low settings I've seen competitive PC players use in games like these strictly to have every little advantage they can get away with, the argument Series S is holding "Next-gen" continues to blow my mind.
DF should show want the bottom of the barely lowest PC settings that many new titles have just to show how low PC still has to account for and then compare to where Series S fits in.
I know most enthusiast are more concerned about the upper limit but I think most people don't know how low the bottom of PC still is.
PS5/XSX Console equivalent Settings Please?
And another win for PS5.
Meanwhile Series S is a huge mistake.
@G P If the PS5's quality and performance leaves people crying I don't know what they want from a game it looks and plays fine.
But really look at the specs between them the CPU difference is very minimum when the Series X is using multithreading (unlike any game will not use it to be honest) the X GPU is more powerful than the PS5's but the PS5's runs at quite abit higher clock speed which seems to be helping the PS5.
Raw power doesnt make a console better the PS3 destroyed the 360 in regard to specs (mainly CPU) but the 360 destroyed the PS3 in how the games ran (Aside from those by Sony themselves)
@G P Sorry my bad.
I got a PS5 at launch but since got a Series S and like it and agreed fantastic price
Callisto protocol analysis please!!