Ukraine-made BTR-4 armored vehicle. A technical profile.
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
- Get the exclusive NordVPN deal here: nordvpn.com/bi.... It’s risk free with Nord’s 30 day money-back guarantee!
Thanks to NordVPN for sponsoring this video.
This video goes in depth on the Ukranian designed and made BTR-4 armored fighting vehicle. How does it compare to other vehicles of its class, like the US Stryker, or the Russian BTR-82?
Images used in the thumbnail:
BTR-4, Kyiv 2021, 10
Photo by VoidWanderer, CC BY-SA 4.0 (creativecommon...)
Music by Matija Malatestinic www.malatestini...
If you want to watch our videos without ads, if you want quick replies to any questions you might have, if you want early access scripts and videos, monthly release schedules - become our Patron.
More here: / binkov
Suggest country pairs you'd like to see in future videos over at our website: www.binkov.com
You can also browse for other Binkov T-Shirts or Binkov merch, via the store at our website, binkov.com/
Subscribe to Binkov's channel for more videos! / binkovsbatt...
Follow Binkov's news on Facebook! / binkovsbattl...
Follow us on Twitter: / commissarbinkov
Get the exclusive NordVPN deal here: nordvpn.com/binkov. It’s risk free with Nord’s 30 day money-back guarantee!
Binkov what are your thoughts about yaoi?
You are a true military Historical Channel 👍
heres ideas for other vids:
1. what if the modern 2022 US NAVY went up against the kriegsmarine and the IMPERIAL JAPANESE NAVY
2. what if the modern US ARMY fought in ww1 interwar WW2 and cold war
3. what if the modern 2022 RUSSIAN ARMY went up against Wehrmacht
4. what if the modern 2022 german army went up against RED ARMY
5. what if the modern british army fought in ww1 interwar ww2 and cold war
6. what if the modern 2022 royal navy went up against Kriegsmarine and the IMPERIAL JAPANESE NAVY
7. what if the modern 2022 french army fought in ww1 interwar ww2 and cold war
and also make a discord server for ideas and stuff
Modern Present day Germany in ww1 ww2 and cold war
modern day Estonia in the estonian war of independence
modern day russia in ww1 ww2 cold war
modern day america in ww1 ww2 cold war
and others set in an alternate timelines
Well this completely changes the World! Go to the 1 min mark th-cam.com/video/lZq2CorcfQ0/w-d-xo.html -5 American carrier strike groups in the Mediterranean and Black Sea and around Europe this is unheard of since WW2!
The Ukrainian's medieval ancestors wished they had BTR when the Mongols invade
NOTE: Binkov is NOT Russian.
He's Croatian.
He may or may not be a frog in real life, dunno.
And what if he was russian? Why does it matter.
@@sherdil3717 Because of all the trolls who bang on about the "Russian frog".
The other reason the engine is mid mounted is for flotation advantages.
Now we have 2 or 3 videos where btr 4 destroy russian tanks and btr-82 in city fight
We have much more. But not in english language. We active used this machine. Also in defense too.
What are they, ATGM variants?
@@looinrims Nope, with the 30mm.
Then link the videos please. Oh yeah, they don't exist.
@@slavicemperor8279 th-cam.com/video/8Smi2OYT_Ng/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/q3oRu_M4mgA/w-d-xo.html
The triad of youtube quality military analysis: The furry, the pig and the muppet
I know the last two but who's the Furry?
@@Curly_Horse Spookston
who is the pig and the furry?
@@fenrir834 The pig is Lazerpig. Don't know the furry.
Biblical, laxer pig and spookston 😎
Indonesia marine had tested the BTR 4 and found that it's amphibious capability is poor, and if am not wrong they also found that the hull is kind of rusty
You're correct--their manufacturing process was not good to protect the hull from corrosion--same problem was noticed when Iraq rejected an imported batch. They need to change their hull coating processes, perhaps do something like the whole-chassis dip process used by VW. Although that requires a lot of investment--probably money they did not have.
@@michaelivey4904 Yeah if Ukraine economy not suck, they might have a decent defense industry. They had Neptune, BTR-4, T-84,etc that have potential to export as an alternative of US and Russia weaponry. But sad it's only if and with this war they might have to start from zero with even minimal funds.
@@Warfare1202 Ukraine was the jewel of the Soviet defense industry-the most defense output per capita of all Soviet Republics BY FAR-particularly in terms of metallurgical engineering and aeronautical guidance and control.
They are quite clever people; hence why they are slaughtering the Russian military like we’ve seen over the past month.
It's mid engined so it must be a sports btr
Its surprising how much the ukrainians can produce domesticly.
They where one of the most important republics of USSR
@@Barten0071 And russian bots still proclaim ukraine is colony of the usa with no industry
It's a big country with nearly 50 million population...
When there's no war and nobody holds anything part of it separate from Kiev government.
There is also space industry, helicopter and planes production. Maybe not the most state of the art but still impressive.
Russia has never replaced the lost ex-soviet industrial complexes when Ukraine turned away. Regaining control over Ukraine would enable Russia to rebuild deep sea navy and modernize vehicles and aircrafts at far greater rate than before. So many important weapons and machines in the Russian army have been made in Ukraine...
It's one of the less often spoken causes for this war, though at this rate it's questionable whether there will be something left to salvage...
Overall it has to be more useful on the battlefield than a BTR 82.
anti tank Barier module very good idea
@@АндрейБ-е1ь btr 4 has also automatic 30mm grenadelaucher and anti-tank module and btr82 hasnt
@@АндрейБ-е1ь also engine power hp 500 at btr4 and 300 at btr 82
@@АндрейБ-е1ь power ratio better look thjs video
@@АндрейБ-е1ь nope, not correct. 15 tonn vs 20 tonn, also 300hp vs 500 hp
Babe, wake up, Binkov posted
But how well does it handle mud conditions? You can't talk about mobility in Ukraine without talking about the mud right now, it's a bigger issue than amphibious capabilities, I think. Certainly, this aspect is more talked about.
The main problem was Russia using cheap Chinese tires and not doing proper maintenance cycles on the tire inflation systems.
I imagine that the better HP/Ton is a big help with such mud conditions.
@@tunaconsuma I mean, I believe that at least part of the reason for having a much stronger engine than the other two models is to handle the mud. I think that makes sense. Not sure how much pull you need though.
@@burddog0792 wrong
Russian BTR's and BMP's are rly cheap and reliable piece of military vehicles the russian army has to offer. But if you can't maintain it properly with care those things are doomed to be stucked in ukrainian mud or gets abandoned due to Supply issues.🤔
The Boxer MRAV is also in this category I think.
There is an advantage in having the driver and gunner sit next to each other, which is that the driver can see through the gunner sighting screen and the can work better cooperatively.
Hey Водитель может дублировать стрелка и у него есть свой прицельный экран. С этим нет проблем.
BTR-4 vs (big Z)BMP-1 video
rip BMP dismount squad's ankles when he shoots high ex under the vehicle to shoot shrapnel and shattered gravel through the boys' legs
Yeah I saw that footage too lol battlefield BC2 got it right.
Nice APC but I sure like the Finnish Patria AMV, that thing tore some new orifices in Afghanistan. After their very good performance in the Russo-Ukraine war I am sure the BTR-4 will get some good sales.
8:30 that’s not armor,it’s foam to improve amphibious capacity
The one having additional armor is called btr-4MV1
Excellent vehicle
i love all ur content . i see u put crimea as Ukraine
OMG.... It's Kermits Eastern European cousin!
Welcome to the club!
Binkov is Croatian, so he's Central European.
It has Thermal in gun turret it is said that driver doesn't have termal only night vision
Hi
YOU ARE 1ST！！
Hey
aww, guys! BTR-4 its a fucking killing machine ! Слава Україні
українська машина смерті
What do you expect from a Russian guy with a literal puppet of a commie general?
in fact they are of good quality. and the story with Iraq was organized by Russia (they bribed Iraqi and some Ukrainian officials). they ruined their reputation and sold their equipment at the same time
But can they be fitted with a cope cage? 🙄😂
Yes, actually. Cage armor is standard on them
Btr 4 has proven its worth and capabilities the recent video the Azov battalion released their btr 4 able to knockout 2 or possibly 3 russian t72 tanks, 1 bmp and 1 btr variants. Thats impressive. And clearly your knowledge about the btr4 is outdated, the btr4 with 30mm gun doesn't have any turret basket and clearly the sight of btr4 with the video released is much better than russian counterparts with much higher refresh rate.
I like the tank but the Azov battalion? You really watching them?
Russian counterparts (BTR-82) have infinity refresh rate, because their sights are outdated periscopic ones, no cameras.
@@anguswaterhouse9255 honestly, not many of us really cares we’re the combat footage comes from. It’s all up for analysis.
@@nobodyherepal3292 But like, they're Nazi's man.
@@anguswaterhouse9255 I mean….ya…but we watch old WW2 footage don’t we? That had lots of Nazi in it too.
I'm keen to see how Ukraine's military will change to Western vehicles in 10-20 years, same for India. The Ukrainian war will likely take a few years, like the Afghan war 1979-1989, before Russia loses and a new president takes over in the Kreml. But during that time not only the Russian military will likely change, but every country that had Russian military equipment, which is not close to the Kreml, right?
I am sure the Ghost of Kuev will ensure the Ukrainian victory. Just like the brave and dead, and THEN resurrected soldiers from the Snake Island who apparently did give up their island, despite the forced legend about them.
Dude. It's not going to happen. The production line of this APC was bombed to shit. You're high on copium.
Please remember Binkov did charity for Ukrainian kids a bit ago, which should tell you all you really need to know about the guy.
Even if he was Russian, the world isn’t mad at Russia/Russians. We are mad at Putin.
The Russian people were his first victims after all.
This,
People need to understand War is not black & white.
While i fully support NATO and ukraine, i cannot forget about the russians who oppose the war and its current government
And of course some the russian soldiers who are forced to participate against their own will
I’m not mad at Putin, I’m mad at Obama and Biden who supported the Maidan coup back in 2013/14.
@@jasip1000 You mad they removed a Russian puppet? Maybe they had far less involvement then you think? Like the revolutions in 1989.
@@jasip1000 oh, you are russian propaganda eater?
@@nielsenn7012 RT have been banned in my country.
Binkov don’t give Russians ideas on how to secure their comms with your sponsor 😝
Uhh the Stryker has a V-shaped hull....
Great job i like your video. Where are you from?
Croatia
@@opticalcanine keep safe . Great job on your video very informative
It gets Thermal, Unlike russian BTR
Yes
Looks also very similar to the French VAB
0
Indonesian Marine Corps use this vehicle. Although I've heard that they're not satisfied with it.
Ukraine🇺🇦. APC 4 Bucephalus, this is a wonderful car, for the driver and commander the door is like in a car, you do not need to climb into the hatch, the commander has a duplicated firing console. The landing force goes where necessary from behind, covering the doors. The engine is one of the best in the world.Finnish Kevlar armor, insulation and again anti-fragmentation armor.
Landing behind the engine, safely, tanks with the outside between the wheels.
Слава Україні 🇺🇦
"Armored personnel carrier 4 Bucephalus, this is a great car, for the driver and the commander the door is like a car, you do not need to climb into the hatch, the commander has a duplicate shooting range. The landing party goes out from behind, hiding behind the doors. The engine is one of the best in the world. Finnish Kevlar armour, insulation and again against fragmentation armour."
Google translate
@@elektrotehnik94 quite nice translation
Недаром наши их захватывают и используют
Хотя горят они тоже хорошо
That 30mm cannon is insane. There's some footage from the Azov battalion showing them engage APCs, IFVs and even a tank (it was previously damaged by an RPG). I had no idea the 30mm gun was so damn effective in combat.
On the second video by Azov, the gunner managed to pierce the tank armor which was in-between the tracks. Really powerful gun.
@@janekduda7548 Ammo selector said OF(HE-Frag) ammo was selected but sure keep spinning Azov hitting an abandoned tank with a few rounds of 30mm HE-Frag as a big win
@@danielkol477 The video clearly shows the surroundings being a battlefield. So not abandoned, but most likely damaged by strikes from other weapon systems. And i can clearly remember the 30 mm piercing the armor between the tracks. Igniting the tank.
It turns out War Thunder wasn't BS at all.
@@danielkol477 look under the bmp in the video, you will see infantry legs as the Russians dismount, then the gunner tries to bounce rounds under the vehicle
The BTR4 has been seen using thermal optics in the Ukrainian war. That probably needs correcting.
It has a huge advantage over Russian BTR's in that it's maintenance budget is not siphoned off by Russian Oligarchs …
Wow dude, Hunter Biden was there siphoning off "10% to the big guy" because it was a free for all in Ukraine. Whatever Russia's problems, Ukraine was way worse.
@@sanriosonderweg Wow dude, you actually believe Hunter Biden is real?
👽🦎
@@sanriosonderweg lol copium, your "second most powerful army" of Orcs are getting humiliated in Ukraine.
instead they are siphoned by ukranian oligarchs
@@shan9usfc mm tasty Latvian Vodka... Slava Ukraine
Azov have been quite the salesmen for BTR4. Some brave crews have been rampaging through the battlefield and doing whatever the fuck they want! Apparently they want to kill Russians.
@@АндрейБ-е1ь Scattered on all fronts, there is probably no front locations where Azov units would not be involved. After mobilization, their number increased by thousands and thousands.
@@АндрейБ-е1ь в україні уже 2 фаза мобілізації
@@АндрейБ-е1ь та ти крім телевізора нічо і невидеш мозок сплавився просто пропащий народ бєтьзя за їду і живе в дєрмє і каже що нам норм знаєш українць як живуть вони дивляться на сусідів і постояно хочуть бути крутіші ніж вони а ви дивитися на сусідів і росказуєте як ти хуйово живети але сусіди ще гірше така мораль
@@АндрейБ-е1ьAzov in Mariupol are probably dead, injured or captured. Mariupol was has surrounded and under attack for weeks with little chance resupply or reinforcements. Maybe some are holding out or have escaped.
I can't stand their politics and I hate the symbols they wear. But I admire the way they fight. They represent a small portion of Ukraine and Russia has many young men of its own with similar hateful politics and ideologies.
@@АндрейБ-е1ь There is, a total mobilization have been started on the second day of the invasion. As for Azov, it's not only one regiment now, now they have numerous of Azov unit across the country.
I've seen footage of one of those that was made for Iraq being used in the war, it's interface language is still Arabic. Stay Strong Ukraine from Baghdad!
That's the video where it makes short work of a Russian BMP-2, some of it's infantry and early in the video also another vehicle. It looked pretty good.
You can also see Arabic language on Ukrainian Skif/Stugna-P ATGM’s made for export
@@guenthersteiner8163 language can be switched, but experienced warriors doesn't pay attention to language:)
@@dutchhoosier9587 ..
I am syrian , and I support ukraine , Slava ukraine , their fight for liberty will help us aswell
How about the transmission, is it using automatic like its American counterpart (Stryker) or manual like its Russian counterpart (BTR-82)
Considering how much less expensive they are, compared to the US, I'd bet it's standard.
It has the automatic one.
Have 2 variants manual or automatic by Allison Transmission.
That's surprising, I would have thought a manual would be cheaper, lighter and more reliable that an automatic.
I assumed they would just stick with manual, K.I.S.S.
@@MostlyPennyCat but most APCs are using automatic, even the Indonesian Anoa which came from a developing country uses automatic, only Chinese and Russian and/or other US hating countries that are still using manual nowadays
Ukrainian BTR4 is a good car, it is automated and used in the war with the Russians. From the armored personnel carrier 4 there is a lot of visual video evidence of the destruction of a 30-millimeter gun destroying Russian armored personnel carriers and even tanks. Armored personnel carrier 4 of Ukraine is very worthy, and in the modification the sea is fire
Looks like a copy of the south african G6
You gotta admit, this thing looks sexy.
As ukrainian girls do.
except the turret that thing is horrific
@@Cypheria nah, I like it.
11:18 *Binkov may talk about real wars, but only hypothetical peace can bring us all together*
There’s a video of BTR 4 blowing up several Russian armoured vehicles.
and the troops behind them.
And the legs of Russian soldiers
azov may be 10-20% nazi but they are doing very good to defend ukraine.
@@vignasimp2835 they are fully nazi, bruh. Even mass media talked about it before the war started
There's videos of collums of trashed btr-4
There is Mariupol combat footage of BTR4 destroying T72. They shoot side fuel tank, 5 - 10 rounds were enough.
i saw that too, they stopped MBT with the BTR-4s
There are two videos of this machine ravaging Russian hardware. One engaging a T-72 then a BRM-1K and one supporting infantry and torching a t-72 then a BTR(I think). You can look for both on r/combatfootage.
The crew in that video are probably dead now
@@constantinethegreat2952 They released another footage. Even if they died, they've done a lot of damage to the Russians.
@@based-24 What type of T 72 was it
Parus turret is fully external, it does not protrude inside the vehicle. The one shown in the video is with the module Spys, which is not really common.
Some of these recent comments are cancer...
The giant rat that makes all of the rules
Its war, nothing gets emotions riled up like war. Plus they are active propaganda campaigns going.
The SR-71 is my favorite aircraft. Maybe not as heavily armed as the Eagle but it's gonna sneak up on them MiGs real quiet like and shoot them with its camera.
My neighbor is an old F-4 Phantom pilot. He saw a little action in Vietnam. I keep telling him to write a book. He had his share of close calls and narrow escapes from MiGs.
These are my 3 favorite aviation books:
- Her Majesty's Top Gun by Sharkey Ward
- Topgun Days by Dave Baranek
- Great Fighter Jets of the Galaxy 1 by Tim Gibson
I really liked btr4. Ukranian designs are very unique i really like them. another example is yatagan mbt
It's definitely a design by a nation of limited means building the best system they can with the resources they have.
@@Bustermachine i would say they are made to be most cost-effective
Both Yatagan and Oplot, as well as Bulat were a failed experiments that never saw usage
Works pretty fine against hordes of Mordor orkz.
you should do a technical profile on Ukrainian tractors with how they're able to go head to head against tanks
THAT would make a great APRIL FOOLS video!
I'm sure the reddit crowd would be laughing and cheering, but the uncomfortable fact is that every meme like the tractors only serves to get more Ukrainians killed in a war they can't win.
April 1st is coming up. Hopefully an April fool's video
So this is sports APC since its mid-engine :D
Real funny 😀
The additional engine performance has been exploited to great effect by Ukrainian forces. The footage of the BTR-4 ripping apart a T72 should tell you that this is a much better platform than people give it credit for. The additional power has allowed operators to leave firing arcs of the older russian turrets. Keeping oblique angles on target while firing to great effect. They are gonna sell these and the Stugna P as a combo meal.
I'm not sure how effective it is against T72s it just seems unikely but i could be completely wrong.
@@thesaddestdude3575 Theres a video from the BTR gunners POV of them punching through the side of a T-72 at a very awkward angle and cooking off its ammunition
@@Jacksparrow3195 War Thunder is more realistic than we could have ever imagined
Also, where tf is that video.
@@Jacksparrow3195 Link? Because I doubt a BTR-4 is going to be knocking out any MBT with a gun that small.
@@rodi8266 th-cam.com/video/n-RXFhwCVaQ/w-d-xo.html
Looks like a well balanced vehicle overall. Just needs better optics.
Nazi personnel carrier - NPC.
And it needs better amphibious capabilities, The Indonesian Marine has tested it sea operational test, and it shows dissapointing results, The hull is unstable while swimming, it dips to the front side while swimming on high speed, that's why the ID Marines refused to continue the acquisition.
Those BTR-4s are kicking Russian armor ass
Ye that’s because there fighting older vehicles
Бтр 4 показал себя как абсолютно никчемная техника, сколько их уже сгорело не сосчитать.. Так ещё и застревает везде
@@rogue__agent5884 wellp... where are all of those armata's, pak fa's and other modern russhian vehicles then?
@@50z10_patpat in testing
@@rogue__agent5884 haha
Ive been very impressed with how ukraine has used these, initially i thought they seemed awfully large and potentially heavy but the seem to have plenty of get up and go, and great movement in urban environments. They also seem to really use there weapon systems to more effect, the btr-82s ive seen often are moving slow with dismounts next to them, or just seem to be static, where the ukrainians seem to get where they need to go and use there btr to respond to more armored threats threating troops. I would love to see the mv1 continue after the war, it certainly seems more forward facing and better equipped for what they need.
Bro. They aren't winning this war. It's questionable to what extent does the factory that made them even exist right now.
Funnily, if any are even left after the war they will be in service with dpr & lpr
There is some very good footage of BTR-4s of the Azov regiment destroying Russian infantry and armored vehicles in Mariupol. Great vehicle in my opinion and miles ahead in terms of sensor technology when compared to the old soviet stuff.
Yes, I was going to comment about this. Really impressive performance of the BTR-4s
@@DeDyson rn real Nazis are russcists with z-v- swastikas
@@DeDyson Oh, that documentary was made by a jew in case you were interested, you should definitely check it out while free speech is still legal in the west. In Russia I'd probably be imprisoned for 10 years for posting stuff on the internet.
Yeah, we've seen combat footage with thermal sights in use, so is Binkov wrong in his video here, or is that footage from a different type of vehicle?
Myanmar Army ordered hundreds from Ukraine and started producing local versions not long ago. They're our main armored personnel carriers now.
Myanmar uses BTR-3 (modified version of BTR-80), not this thing with glass windows.
Won’t be many left soon the way the war in the north is going
@@aidan1445 In north of Myanmar? No BTR of Myanmar has been in active battle use yet (to my knowledge, at least).
@@thantzweaung9080 yeah, most footage from Myanmar is isolated junta soldiers being harassed by rebels in flip flops
@@meisterproper8304 Junta troops are also in flip-flops. Footwear in most ultra-formal attire in Myanmar is flip-flops / slippers. We, citizens of Myanmar, really love flip-flops. lol
It looks good. On a lot of occasions - at least two in Mariupol alone. The BTR 4 has smashed multiple enemy ifvs and apcs, including engaging two tanks. Damaging one and destroying the other.
sure
@@22.calibermaster98 The two videos are concrete. There's nothing to be "sure" about them. It's a fact.
In the first video the BTR engages 1 tank at a distance(damaging it, probably survived) and then destroys two APCs, plus a team of russian soldiers behind one of them. The second video it destroys an IFV and engages a tank - managing to pierce it's lower armor, between the tracks and destroy it.
Right, just seen yesterday one burned to a crisp in Kiev suburb.
Naturaly it was "Russian"
@@janekduda7548 disabling a tank is all you need
Again, don't fuckin spam my comment, i'm simply stating an interesting fact. Not trying to say the BTR-4 is the second coming of the Tiger Tank.
These are wrecking BMPs by the looks of things. Maybe they need more anti tank missiles attached though.
they already have 4 barrier missiles that can penetrate 800mm behind ERA or around 1000-1100 without ERA also that 30mm canon fire 30x165mm rounds that can penetrate 46mm of RA at 60 degree angle or about 90mm at 0 degree angle for comparison side armor of modern tanks is around 30-80mm of RA
not surprising considering they are decades old equipment, with hardly any modernization
And 30mm autocannons have been proven devastating many times before (as far back as OP Desert Storm).
Watched these BTR4'S Destroy Russian armor in Mariupol, very effective and Ukrainian troops are more motivated than Russian troops.
What armor is a troop carrier capable of destroying?
@@Head_Coach Most Likely BMPs and other BTRs
EDIT: if it has the auto cannon or AT variant
@@Head_Coach there’s clear video of it igniting a t-72
In twitter
@@Head_Coach it has Barrier ATGMs
Да прикол в тому коли БТР веде десант то моторний відсік захищає екіпаж від ворожих снарядів , з переду двоє осіб тому що один займається водінням а другий орієнтує і водія і екіпаж і попереджує, десант висаджується заду так безпечніше у боях і простіше займати позиції вздовж дороги.
У росіян кабіна з повним екіпажем спереду і їх простіше уразити оскільки у них тонка броня , тим більш вихід з боку , і поки вони вилазять їх просто розстріляти. Коротко кажучи руська фанера)
Do your researches better.
Greetings from Ukraine)
what parts of this is wrong or not resarched well enough?
@@Rex1987 btr4 has hatches for personell and paratroopers in roof
there are 6 variants of vehicle (recon БРМ-4К, command БТР-4К, БРЕМ-4К, БСЕМ-4К, БТР-4Е and fire support МВП-4К)
only early versions didn`t include medium gun turret
in frontal projection it can handle up to 14.5 mm
btr4 has night vision scope or optic scope (or thermal scope in parus module)
there are 4 compatible fighting modules (Грім, Шквал, Парус and BAU-23X2)
only Грім and Шквал takes space inside vehicle
Парус module can be remotely controlled
antitank missiles can be Бар'єр or Конкурс (4 missiles or 2 missiles + АГС-17 automatic granades launcher)
other parts of video is accurate and well made
information can be checked uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%A2%D0%A0-4
Well then this is such shitty research it's actually pathetic.
Good to know Blinkov is more and more becoming the armchair general of War-related accuracy of research.
@@elektrotehnik94 other parts were accurate
Aha, that is what was messing up a tank and a BMP the other week. There was talk of it being 30mm. It moved and air-braked like it was on wheels.
Ahh , the strafing video.
It was actually a BRM, not a BMP
The most sexy ass vehicle on the planet yet no game fucking includes it.
into the radius has it
a goddamn roblox roleplay game has it
War thunder should add it
Lol Russia is making a APC called the Boomerang ? need to rename it 'the stick' thats what we Australians call a Boomerang that doesn't come back .
Only certain boomerangs come back😆
8:36 Indonesian Marine BTR-4
Unfortunately due to poor amphibious performance the Indonesians cancelled their order for 55 units after only half a dozen units.
Really promising vehicle regardless! I hope they can continue to be produced.
As for the Indonesians, they used modernized PT-76s (with a stabilized 90mm gun) and a smaller 6x6 APC (Anoa APC)
Same story with T-84 oplot for Thailand and Btrs for Iraq- Kharkov machine building plant had abysmal quality control ever since the fall of the soviet union
Me watching the 30th video about Ukraine on TH-cam today.
If Ukraine win, you should analyse it and create a video about about "how a modern asymmetrical warfare works"
This war is not an asymmetric war
Like stated in the comment above, this war is not asymmetrical and Ukraine has no real chance to win, despite what the media keeps saying.
@@Melanrick no chance to anihiliate the whole russian army sure, but russia is heading to a tactical defeat. It wont matter anyway because putin lovers and russian fanboys will still claim they won everywhere or whatever, this years mai parade should be fun :)
@@lucianioncelescu3302 a Win is a Win tho.
When the second powerful military in the world go against a nation with 1/10 of its airforce, I would call it asymmetrical, because Russia has a clear advantage in both quality and quantity.
I know that the victory is impossible, but we are living impossible times.
*THOOMP THOOMP THOOMP intensifies*
The fact there’s a video of this thing penning a t72b3, it’s pretty impressive.
Unless they hit that with a rocket first, I don’t know, but it shredded the bmp :o
they didn't, that's why they retreated.
@@teamidris No theres another video from Mariupol that showed this thing just absolutely shredding a T72
@@JiggleWiggleBagel T72 sides and fuel tanks barely have any armor, especially around the engine section. If not destroyed you can easily mobility kill it.
@@Kolobochok95 it was definitely a mobility hit to the upper tanks. What’s funny is that those tanks are required to be filled with inert retardant when engaging in urban warfare. The fact it burst into flames really tells me the Russian crews are undertrained or the officers are incompetent or both.
BTR-4 has a 30mm auto cannon and a 30mm grenade launcher.
the interiors of this IFV look SO COMFY! this is complete 180 from Soviet design doctorine- spaceious interior, good visibility, not designed as jack of all trades. the Ukranians realized the best compromise between western quality and eastern affordability.
This
Except that it's everything but affordable. It has American engine and transmission and severe QC issues (faulty welding, gun stabilizator not working, bad steel). Most export customers refused to pay and canceled orders
@@piotrgrzelak2613 considering it is a new development it is understandable that the vehicle may have some issues, if the Ukraininans could do it, without this war, they would be able to fix the issues and maybe it would be a very good option for export to other countries, personally this vehicle looks very nice and very interesting
@@nullanonsonemmenoiocosascr6676 It's not new. They were in production since like 2009
@@piotrgrzelak2613 well maybe with some time the issues might be resolved, we unfortunately don't know tho due to this conflict
Unfortunately, the war isn't hypothetical, this time. But thanks for the video, it was very informative. It would be great to have others like this one about hardware deployed in Ukraine, be it Ukrainian or Russian.
No Marine LAV25? *Sad marine noises*
it was too weighed down with crayons for it to be included in the video.
Already saw video from Mariupl, It smoked T72 firing into the side where carousel should be lmao
We count on a Sesame Street reject to keep us informed about a real war happening in real time.
My wife: "are you getting military Intel from a puppet?"
Me: "Say what you want, Binkov knows his shit."
Yhea it looks like a vehicle u dont want to fuk with and it looks fukin bad ass and quite armord compared to the Russian btrs but that might be result of the paint because Ukrainians are like the only people who can make a good looking vehichle
Good fukin job Ukraine I like this one. Its sexy as shit
@@АндрейБ-е1ь No, its not. The first models and prototypes were former BTR-70's, but the newer ones produced after 2014 were completely produced in ukraine. Stop spreading russian propaganda. I have seen you in various comments here and its obvious that you are a russian troll.
@@fleekrushyt9410 Yeah yeah ive heard this bs already, stop spreading ukrainian propaganda, its not even better then russian.
Дякую!!
@@АндрейБ-е1ь ну у БТР 4 броня набагато товща
@@АндрейБ-е1ь th-cam.com/video/mY3grJS0Od4/w-d-xo.html
На.
The BTR-4 is by far the best protected. The engine placement adds more protection to the squad behind it
@DiversityIsOurStrength Well that's extreme for any BTR, but comparatively to other BTR's the BTR-4 would be slightly better at stopping spalling from smaller arms and fragments from explosives if entering from the front of the vehicle. Israel's Merkava MBT uses the same principle of placing the engine forwards to utilize every part of the tank for added protection without sacrificing space or speed
Due to the location of the engine in front of the BTR-4, it will be easier to turn into an immobilized target
@@oranje-vrystaat3182 that's preferable to death
4:55
Just got a courtesy of arguing over that on Spookston's video about Stryker MGS.
MEXAS on LAV III protects from 14.5*114 only at ranges above 500 meters(and I still don't know which round they used to test it). Stryker is based on LAV III, has similar weight and also uses MEXAS.
There is newer generation applique armor from same manufacturer, but Stryker isn't getting it. LAV 6 does:P
Remember when this guy predicted on how Russia will sorround Ukrainian cities and they will surrender ))
As well they should have. No one expects a military to drive in a straight line.
How will it seem? Where there are troops, they are fighting surrounded. And where there are no troops and the Russian army enters the city, then people go to rallies and expel the Russian army.
Yea if they dont surrender they will be burried where they stand . Ie Mariupol 11,000 ukranian casulties
Did not finish yet dont worry...
@@chrismtb5193 Stregically and diplomatically it is finished already now only thing left is who controls how much Blitzkrieg is finished
"Hypothetical war..."
Ukraine, "nothing hypothetical today, and the only thing we want together is our country."
When BTR-4 was in early stage of Army acceptance, it was plagued by low quality of armor. But, as it turns now, best armor is no armor. Until you can impressively punch enemy with advantageous optics and fire control, it does not matter.
fun fuct after 2014-2022 there was stated that BTR-4 has 200+ improvements
Glass Cannons surely are powerful until they get hit
BTR Bucefal
is this what we saw 2v1 a russian tank and apc the other day?
Yep
the tank and apcs were abandoned so it wasn't really a 2 v 1
@@ryssa2409 there were russian troops behind the apc.. if you look at the bottom, you can see legs moving..
@@kdawg9477 he was talking about another video, the one you mentioned was btr4 1v1ing an LDPR BMP1
@@kdawg9477 The BMP turret also turned from left to right but it did not manage to fire as the gunner presumably was killed
Thanks for a well rounded description without political bias.
I've been extremely impressed by the BTR-4's performance against Russian forces in Ukraine.
Putin's wars have made Ukraine and its defense industries step their games up, and the BTR-4 is no exception.
Stryker getting called American over and over again, when it’s just a license built LAV-III
And the LAV-III is a license build Mowag Piranha. Licenses on licenses homie
To be fair Canadians modified the Piranha.
Stryker isn’t the exact same, there are variants and changes the Americans made
It’s like saying M-50 is just M4 sherman and not Israeli…pretty silly
Wow, the Stryker looks pretty good by comparison..
It doesn't have thermal? But the videos from Mariupol show a thermal imaging for the gun? 🤔
Was it an upgrade?
Thermal cameras are some of the most popular gifts from Ukrainian volunteer organizations to Ukrainian army.
Those, and some light scout drones
@@Poctyk Yes, hand-held thermal imagers, not thermal imagers on a fucking BTR.
It has Thermal in gun turret it is said that driver doesn't have termal only night vision
Thanks
It's not just about watcha got, it's also how ya use it. 😉
Doesn't account for crew efficiency. It's kind of like saying you're bringing a T-34 into modern combat and saying it's all about the crew. No, they will literally get toasted before they can get a shot off.
Exactly Russians outnumbered Ukrainians with everything and still losing
@@klutzspecter3470
How do you think "it's also how ya use it" is _not_ about crew efficiency?
10:43 ow it looks so sad :(
😂😂😂 good catch.. took me a while to notice
Haha!
Can you do a video on the new weapons platforms the Ukrainians have fielded against the Russians. Im not sure what they are called. But they all say New Holland, International Harvester, Ford or John Deere. Completely wiping out Russian armor.
You mean Stugna (Стугна)? anti-tank missile system? Or something else?
@@ВадимСтецюра-й7о It is a top secret platform so they are calling them "tractors", in the time-honored tradition of the Leichttraktor and the Grosstraktor
Thanks for the great analysis.
T
The main thing I learned from this videos is how awesome the striker is.
Take a look the boxer then.
The Stryker is aging and overloaded, but still better than any BTR
Some magnificent Swiss license design
@@cahsahhhhhhhn nah
You could’ve also included the German „Boxer“ armored vehicle.
You might be from Russia, but your Videos seem really honest about West/Ukrainien and Russian Combat vehicles and I Respect your Phrase at the End of newest Videos! NO War
*KUDOS* 👍
Edit: OK you are from croatia, sry mea culpa!
I think they are from Croatia
I'm pretty sure he is Croatian, not Russian
He's not from Russia. He's Croatian
@@langcheng4480 OK thanks!
These things tore up Burger Town
BTR-82s actually
James Ramirez ?
@@The_Corporal Corporal Dunn?
@@liam7664 Adrian
they didnt stand a chance to Ramirez tho
The real war showed the high effectiveness of the BTR 4 against the entire spectrum of Russian metal scrap, now the Russians do not laugh.
lol its coming out that most of the shit that the russians have is just junk. and bought alot of stuff from china. and its failing like crazy...
Actually BTR-4's are a nightmare for the Ukrainian armed forces. They don't have the available maintenance since all their factories were bombed, and their fuel is also limited since majority of their fuel depots were destroyed.
Not to mention, Russians captured these vechiles and mechanics have said these vehicles are entirely stupid as each one has a slightly different design, making it nearly impossible to maintain since they aren't standardized.
@@HungaryBased Well, Hungary is being Hungary it seems.
@@anothernumber6679 what do you mean?
@@MRsolidcolor
I was 19 years old and skint but needed four new tyres to get my MK2 Golf through it's MOT.
I got a full set of reconditioned Chinese-made _"Goodrides"_ for forty pounds... Within a month I was back at the workshop ordering four Japanese-made Toyos'.
Russia clearly didn't learn from my frugal purchasing folly... A cautionary tale indeed...