MicroNugget: Private VLANs

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 54

  • @jgl1563
    @jgl1563 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    holy guacamole... i´ve never seen this level of perfection, the clearest sound, concise and concrete video and the best ilustration!

  • @ВладиславГнип-д4т
    @ВладиславГнип-д4т 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The only 1 man on youtube, who actually explained how this mechanism of pvlans works! Ty a lot!!

    • @cbtnuggets
      @cbtnuggets  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for the kind words!

  • @lukeb0030
    @lukeb0030 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    i enjoyed how much you loved talking about private-vlans you almost couldn't contain your joy at the end there ! 10/10

  • @myunusansari5088
    @myunusansari5088 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    no words to thank. i am complete new to topic and at age 55+ i can understand. you made it easy through your nice presentation. be blessed.

  • @theMasch1na
    @theMasch1na 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks a lot for these MicroNuggets. Makes my learning and labbing so much better and easier. Just watch micronugget and lab it out!! Don't have to read 300 pages or watch 30 min video about a topic!! I really encourage you guys to do more of such videos, these are golden. Thanks again.

  • @kennethataro9422
    @kennethataro9422 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You just demystified PVLAN. thanks a bunch

  • @BryanMPhx
    @BryanMPhx 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bryan McGann thinks that this Private VLAN video is excellent. This is great training for the Cisco SWITCH exam.

  • @karimbakhshamiry5958
    @karimbakhshamiry5958 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The nicest explanation I got about private vlans!

  • @ricardoconcepcion
    @ricardoconcepcion 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video. I can say now that I know about how private vlan works. With a simple analogy you explain a hard concept very wel. Thanks.

  • @MedhaviN
    @MedhaviN 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As always, your the best Keith!!

  • @alfonsotrocciola4527
    @alfonsotrocciola4527 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I saw some videos in a ccnp security training but really this explaination is still kicking! Thanks a LOT!!!

  • @ismatatia
    @ismatatia 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is wonderfully described. Just perfect. Thanks you very much Keith. :)

  • @aksel9392
    @aksel9392 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    great explanantion,hat's off mr keith

  • @LalGebi
    @LalGebi 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great Video.. I have some queries
    1) what about communicating between two different Primary VLAN having secondary VLAN?
    2) Does inter VLAN routing will work as it is as before or it will be affected by PVLAN security?
    3)What in case we have access between two devices in terms of interVLAN routing but no access in terms of PVLAN security. What would be effective access?

  • @stephenphyo28
    @stephenphyo28 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very brilliant explanation

  • @lynxlive555
    @lynxlive555 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    just a question when typing the description, [! explanation] is that a way to do hostnames or is it meant just as a description for the video. maybe a note like in programing [//explanation]. was curious

  • @datedatekyal3650
    @datedatekyal3650 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Keith.

  • @ahmedabduljabar6269
    @ahmedabduljabar6269 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Keith, that was amazing .. this was more then a good review before i start reading the Private VLANs at CCIE Level ..thanks a lot :)

    • @Bleachiiigo
      @Bleachiiigo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      اهلا احمد ان شاء الله تكون جهزت و اخذت شهادة ال CCIE ياصديقي

  • @shreyaperla3828
    @shreyaperla3828 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the great video!! Can the same port be part of isolated and community VLANs with different VLAN ids?
    Eg: Gi 0/11 as a part of VLAN200 and VLAN300 where VLAN200 is isolated VLAN and VLAN300 is community VLAN

  • @rumildaolik4905
    @rumildaolik4905 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent explanation

  • @joshharding6925
    @joshharding6925 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Keith, perfectly explained and makes sense. +1 subscription from me

  • @Alestrix76
    @Alestrix76 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are the VLANs 200, 300, 400, 500 visible outside the switch, i.e. past the uplink port, or will the Ethernet frames show up as tagged with ID 100?

  • @TahaEltahawy
    @TahaEltahawy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing Thank you

  • @mrpeterdrake
    @mrpeterdrake 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, great analogy, explanation and full config in under 10 minutes! Are you going to cover VACL's?

    • @keithbarker4353
      @keithbarker4353 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Peter-
      We cover VACL's in the CCNP Security SENSS course at www.CBTNuggets.com
      If you aren't yet a member, there is a 7 day free trial and during that time you could check out the videos on VACLs, as well as the more in depth videos about Private VLANs.
      Thanks for the feedback.
      Keith

  • @naumanrasheed3635
    @naumanrasheed3635 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    but even the creation of vlan access ports also does the same job right?

  • @shihab6573
    @shihab6573 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have done and ensured all this thing.but my vlan type is not changing it is showing type as normal,i have made it to community and isolated but not working

  • @berndeckenfels
    @berndeckenfels 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does the primary vlan have to be the only one for all ports or can. I have two primaries to half the switch

    • @cbtnuggets
      @cbtnuggets  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Bernd, thank you for your question! The primary VLAN will be the native VLAN, this is for the untagged traffic. There isn’t really a purpose to have two native VLANs. You’d have your VLAN 10, 20 for example on let’s say each half of the switch and that would isolate the traffic for the respective ports. There will still be a VLAN 1, which by default is the native VLAN. We hope this is helpful, let us know if you have any other questions. Thank you for learning with us!

  • @chuckbarnett_tx
    @chuckbarnett_tx 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow where did you get that stuff? it must be pretty strong.

  • @rasheedmalik6594
    @rasheedmalik6594 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    OMG its a lot of work for only couple of VLANs....in case it's used for security, then why not implement VACL or Protected Edge Ports concept?

  • @myunusansari5088
    @myunusansari5088 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    commendable job.

  • @Kaburrub
    @Kaburrub 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great

  • @cristobalvallejosv
    @cristobalvallejosv 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Keith....this is new for me....can you add some use of this Private VLANs....realistic schenarios....why to use them instead of using normal access vlans?...regards from Chile!

    • @DavisTasar
      @DavisTasar 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Imagine if you hosted a server farm for clients (like Rackspace or Microsoft Azure, VMWare, etc.). Instead of creating a subnet for each host, you can put them in an isolated VLAN and not worry about who can talk to whom. That's the first one that comes to my mind.

    • @cristobalvallejosv
      @cristobalvallejosv 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      DavisTasar
      Thanks david....I have been reading more about this feature but now I realize this is not supported in whole cisco Switch suit...

    • @lynxlive555
      @lynxlive555 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cristobal Vallejos
      yep need a layer 3 switch I believe. 3560 or later series. if your running a 3550 youd need to go "router-on-a-stick" topology for inter vlan routing. The trunk port would become the "dock".

    • @keithbarker4353
      @keithbarker4353 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Davis on an excellent example!
      Cheers,
      Keith

  • @sbentjies
    @sbentjies 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Started going way too fast on the console commands around the 8 minute mark forward. Slow it down

    • @cbtnuggets
      @cbtnuggets  10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      sbentjies Thanks for the comment. We have passed along your feedback to Keith for him to take into consideration when creating future MicroNuggets.

    • @jessesanchez5294
      @jessesanchez5294 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought the speed is fine...

  • @HKashaf
    @HKashaf 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If I sign up for cbtnuggets again it would be because of Kieth.

  • @amitkhuldar5222
    @amitkhuldar5222 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    show vlan private-vlan command shows non-operational.

  • @Unregisteredization
    @Unregisteredization 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's the need of using Private VLANs ?

    • @Unimath22
      @Unimath22 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      VAN Added security. Isolated ports can only talk to promiscuous ports. So you have a way of isolating hosts which are in the same subnet from each other.
      Another use would be to save address space. If you need to have lots of vlans with just a few hosts in them, you could use the private vlan concept. Normally one vlan would be mapped to one subnet, here you can have the subnet mapped to the primary vlan and you can have the community/isolated vlans in the same subnet.

  • @auzzierocks
    @auzzierocks 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    don't get me started on intervlan routing on trunk ports of a dist switch, what a pain! access switch1 has vlan xxx , access switch2 has vlan yyy connected to dist switch's trunk designated ports. router on a stick set up correctly, and guess what, vlan xxx and yyy won't come online... kill me

    • @cowboyspace1
      @cowboyspace1 ปีที่แล้ว

      facts, this is a pain like no one shows that i believe.

  • @kornelious1
    @kornelious1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    The single one thing that was left off and still leaving me with questions is the "WHY" why do you need isolated ports? the fact that was left off is agitating... No use learning a feature and not knowing why you would use it. What is the significance of isolated ports?...

    • @jeffdoe1210
      @jeffdoe1210 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Isolated ports is nice because you can configure different department within them VLANS. This means that a switch is only going to forward a broadcast to only those in the group.Once you get beyond a few hundred devices in your broadcast domain, your broadcast traffic gets to the point where it's making a serious negative impact on your network.

  • @Noureddinbenoureddin-j9q
    @Noureddinbenoureddin-j9q หลายเดือนก่อน

    👍