hey great video and thanks for your efort but why are configuring the host ports in two ways? is one better or newer then the other or just for demonstration?
Do you mean community and isolated? I used both here for demonstration. You can use one, the other, or both. Neither is better or newer than the other. They serve different purposes, depending on what you need to achieve.
Yes, you're right! I did say two community VLANs. I was thinking of a lab I did where I used an isolated VLAN. One community VLAN for each customer, and the primary VLAN to tie it all together. The Primary ports need to be 'promiscuous' so hosts in the secondary vlans can reach them.
If you have private VLAN support on both switches then which VLAN ID do you allow on trunk links between them? is it only primary VLAN ID or you allow primary, community and isolated VLAN ID as well over trunk links?
Allow all the vlans that you want to trunk. So Primary, and whichever secondaries that you need (you don't have to do them all, it depends on what you're trying to achieve)
Do you mean if you have two switches with a trunk link? If they're both PVLAN speakers, then yes, the same commands. If they're not PVLAN aware, then the other side is configured as normal.
Hey man could you please do a video on Wi-Fi channel and Frequencies, MHz, GHz and stuff like that? Please I really need this these days bro . Much appreciated
Thanks for the suggestion. I'm going to be honest here, WiFi is not my strong point at the moment. Mostly I've been focusing on a weird hybrid of Enterprise, data centre, and the smallest dash of service provider. If I start branching out into WiFi, I will definitely add something here.
This is how even way complex thing can be boiled down and pour into a cup as soup . hats off Sir
great stuff again, making complicated protocols easy. love this channel
Argument by argument you are helping me understanding complex networking (ccna point of view)
Thanks, i love your videos ✌🏻👏🏻👏🏻
GREAT WORK!
Great Explanations!
Keep it up!
Thanks, glad it’s all making sense!
hey great video and thanks for your efort but why are configuring the host ports in two ways? is one better or newer then the other or just for demonstration?
Do you mean community and isolated? I used both here for demonstration. You can use one, the other, or both.
Neither is better or newer than the other. They serve different purposes, depending on what you need to achieve.
Network Direction but you said at 6:22 that you are gone use 1x primary vlan and 2x community vlan. maybe I‘m wrong, my english is not that good..
Yes, you're right! I did say two community VLANs. I was thinking of a lab I did where I used an isolated VLAN.
One community VLAN for each customer, and the primary VLAN to tie it all together. The Primary ports need to be 'promiscuous' so hosts in the secondary vlans can reach them.
Network Direction ouu ok now is everything clear, I was just wondering 😅
thanks man for time and keep up the great work!
Glad to help!
Random comment for a video like this... But I was wondering if you could do any Palo Alto NGFW stuff soon, if you can!?
Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately I don’t have any Palo Alto to use to build up some content
Great explanation and video.
Thanks!
Full article here: networkdirection.net/articles/routingandswitching/private-vlans/
Downloadable lab here: networkdirection.net/labsandquizzes/labs/pvlan-lab-1/
Is this same concept with Q in Q vlan?
Thanks for the video. :)
You're very welcome. Hope you liked it
Do you know if there's a way to expand the pvlan config to a switch that doesn't support pvlan? Does works with both vlan and pvlan traffic?
If you have private VLAN support on both switches then which VLAN ID do you allow on trunk links between them? is it only primary VLAN ID or you allow primary, community and isolated VLAN ID as well over trunk links?
Allow all the vlans that you want to trunk. So Primary, and whichever secondaries that you need (you don't have to do them all, it depends on what you're trying to achieve)
How about the other side - does the port have the same commands?
Do you mean if you have two switches with a trunk link? If they're both PVLAN speakers, then yes, the same commands.
If they're not PVLAN aware, then the other side is configured as normal.
Hey man could you please do a video on Wi-Fi channel and Frequencies, MHz, GHz and stuff like that?
Please I really need this these days bro . Much appreciated
Thanks for the suggestion. I'm going to be honest here, WiFi is not my strong point at the moment. Mostly I've been focusing on a weird hybrid of Enterprise, data centre, and the smallest dash of service provider.
If I start branching out into WiFi, I will definitely add something here.
@@NetworkDirection Ok man , things about servers would be great too.
Keep em coming
Trunking concept is not clear, could you please give a practical example for trunking with configuration?
Maybe this will help:
www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12-2/31sga/configuration/guide/config/pvlans.html#wp1130380