The first thing that comes to mind is stupid people overpaying for an object that is not even that beautiful just to flex. I hope Hermes owns the lawsuit and make the bags even more scares and expensive
Hang on Hermès is not Zara- artisans are making these bags and they’re not just pumping them out. No one is forcing you to buy ‘Birkin bait’ or go on ‘the journey’. For any shop/boutique loyal customers receive priority at some level. This is part of what keeps a business in business! As I’ve asked on other YT posts, what are they trying to achieve here? Telfar drops or reimbursement for silk scarves they’ve purchased? To me this lawsuit is a bit nonsensical and unnecessary.
A lawsuit because you can't get a bag!!!! If you aren't denied the bag based on race, religion, gender, sexual preference, physical or mental ability, do you REALLY have a suit? This brand has a right to secure it's exclusivity. I hope they retire the bag for a few years and tick off the hissy fit throwing cry babies!
The first thing that comes to mind is stupid people overpaying for an object that is not even that beautiful just to flex. I hope Hermes owns the lawsuit and make the bags even more scares and expensive
Hang on Hermès is not Zara- artisans are making these bags and they’re not just pumping them out. No one is forcing you to buy ‘Birkin bait’ or go on ‘the journey’. For any shop/boutique loyal customers receive priority at some level. This is part of what keeps a business in business! As I’ve asked on other YT posts, what are they trying to achieve here? Telfar drops or reimbursement for silk scarves they’ve purchased? To me this lawsuit is a bit nonsensical and unnecessary.
A lawsuit because you can't get a bag!!!! If you aren't denied the bag based on race, religion, gender, sexual preference, physical or mental ability, do you REALLY have a suit? This brand has a right to secure it's exclusivity. I hope they retire the bag for a few years and tick off the hissy fit throwing cry babies!